What happened to the "next" track command?

the new itunes has so many falws that I am seriously looking for alternatives. One of the most frustrating is the next button that enables one to go the to next track when editing individual track data without having to jusp back out to the album level and mannually select the next track. Is there a fix to this????

I just did a little more digging. They are there for TV Shows and Music, but not for movies.

Similar Messages

What happened to the next/previous buttons in Get Info?

I am trying to edit a number of movie files and in the past I was able to quickly scroll through different files in Get Info with the Next and Previous buttons (or by using Command-N and Command-P). Those buttons and their keyboard shortcuts have recently disappeared?
Has anybody else noticed this? Is there a reason? A way to bring them back?

I just did a little more digging. They are there for TV Shows and Music, but not for movies.

My iTunes plays a song for 5 seconds then skips to the next track. what the ****?

i recently moved my itunes library from my imac to im new Macbook pro. now when i play back in itunes (v10.6.1) random artists only play back like 5 seconds of a song before going to the next track. what happen?

now when i play back in itunes (v10.6.1)
Doublechecking ... do you still get that if you update to iTunes 10.6.3.25?
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/

What happens to the original photo after editing? Does it get replaced by the edited photo?

I just bought my first iPhone(5). On Android, when editing a photo, the original stays in your gallery and the edited photo gets placed right next to it. So what I want to know is, When editing a photo in the photo app, what happens to the original since it would be nice to be able to make different edits of it.

That is an excellent question. This is definitely not the programmed behavior of Photoshop Elements. Normally, when you edit a file, a new copy of the file is created (the original is simply left alone). This new copy of the file will have "_edited-1" added to the end of the name. It should definitely not be adding $ to the name at all.
Just as a test, create a new user account on your computer, and try editing another image to see if does the same thing there. However, I suspect there is another application on your computer that is modifying how files are saved, deleted, and renamed.

In case of a DB crash what happens to the status of the Control File

When a DB is crashed will the Control file that exists in the OS also get corrupted, What happens to the Data Files , how to recover the Control files and Data Files , the DB in case there isn't any Backup media or any Dump available on the DB.

The only one way to recover a database is to be in archivelog mode.
And if I said about recover stricto sensu, that's because even in noarchivelog mode we need to use the command recover until cancel before an open with resetlogs option, even if we haven't any redo/archive logs. That fake a recover, this is what we say a mimic recover. Which is not a recover stricto sensu like it can be the case with archivelog mode.
Nicolas.

What happened to the multi-touch gestures in Finder?

I've updated to Lion last week. Overall, I think what Apple did was great to the overall experience. However, my only gripes are in Finder. What happened to the multi-touch gestures? The only thing that I can do is flip through files in cover view using two finger swipes.
What happened to the pinch to zoom in and out? I've seen other posts about this so I'll stop here. Apple please bring this function back. I'm tired of moving my mouse to the drag handle.
Secondly, I was using three finger swipes to navigate to the previous and next folder in Finder. Since two finger is used to flip through cover view, I see why they couldn't extend the back/forward function to two finger swipes as they did in Safari and I know that three finger swipe is used to change desktops. I wish that Apple was more creative to leave this function in somehow.
Is there a way to bring these functions back to Finder? These are the functions that I used all the time.

That doesn't explain why they would remove the pinch to zoom in and out. That is not be used by anything else in finder. If I'm going through pictures, I would like to zoom in on the images for cover view.
As far as the three figure swipes to go back and forth in finder, I understand why that has been removed. However, Apple could have implemented the two finger swipe just like in Safari which is sensitive to the acceleration of the swipes. If you swipe with two fingers somewhat fast, you can go back and forth between previous and next page. If you swipe with two fingers slowly, you can pan left and right on the same page.
They could have done something to retain the functionality versus taking out the functionality all together. As of now, these functionalities do not exist. I'm hoping that something is going to change and we'll have to see what the future brings.

Changing up what happens at the 'select resource - queued' step

Greetings!
So, I'm curious .. we'd like to change how we do things regarding what happens at the select resource - queued step. Our current state is a series of business checks, place the call on hold, play CUCM MOH, take the call off hold, go back to the queue loop and repeat.
To change things up I'd like to play some royalty-free music as a prompt instead of putting the call on hold. I would use boolean flags to keep track of what prompts have played so callers do not hear the same wav file over and over and over. So, I'm thinking of doing something like this ...
At the queued step ..
play a prompt
begin the queue loop
     business check
     agent check
     play royalty-free (RF) music clip 1 (45 sec)
     play informational prompt 1 (15 sec)
     opt-out check
go back to the queue loop
2nd time through ..
     business check
     agent check
     play RF 2 (45 sec)
     play info 2 (15 sec
     opt-out check
3rd time ...
     business check
     agent check
     play RF 3 (45 sec)
     play info 3 (6 sec)
     opt-out check
4th time ...
     business check
     agent check
     play RF 4 (45 sec)
     play info 4 (6 sec)
     opt-out check
And maybe one more time playing these types of prompts before we switch to placing the call on hold and playing CUCM MOH. Generally, most calls are answered before the five minute mark, however, we do have outliers who wait a very long time. Playing CUCM MOH might be the appropriate thing to do for those rare instances?
I'm curious if anyone else has tried this and am hoping for some feedback?
Thanks!
Keith

Hi
There's nothing wrong with doing it that way. I've seen a few customers play music from prompts rather than holding; it's easier to maintain/change that way.
Aaron

What happened to the Artwork tab in my movie file?

What happened to the Artwork tab in the Get Info section of my movie file? Does anyone know how to get it back?

One possibility is that there are no files in the Downloads, or that the Safari list has been cleared. What happens if you download something - does the tab appear?
Also, in the View menu there is a command "Show Downloads" you might try.

What happened to the Jukebox feature in iTunes??

Please Please Please bring back the jukebox functionality!

What happened to the Jukebox feature in iTunes??
It has been replaced by a similar but better capability known as "Up Next."
See this guide:
iTunes 11 for Windows: Ways to play songs

What happened to the illustration window that was on the bottom left part?

What happened to the illustration window that was on the bottom left part of previous versions?
We were also able to choose between the illustration of the selected track and the illustration of the listened track.

Look on the last line where it used to be and hit the arrow icon.

What happened to the new releases alphabetical list?

What happened to the new releases alphabetical list? You used to get a list sorted by date when you click ALL in new releases. Now, they only list "featured" new releases with pictures of the artwork. Is there still a way to see the alphabetical list by release date.

yes - i have the latest version; and the change to their new releases occured over a month ago. A couple weeks ago, the old format returned briefly.
Does anyone from Itunes review the forum? I would buy a lot more tracks if i was able to see all that are available.

Why won't iTunes continue to the next track in an album?

Hello.
After recently updating to iTunes 5.2 on my primary computer (a 1.5 GHz. 15-inch PowerBook G4 running Mac OS X 10.5.8 (Leopard)), iTunes will not continue to the next song in an album once a song is finished. In "Album" view, for instance, if I mouse over an album and click "Play Album," iTunes will play the first track on that album, but then will not proceed to play the next track once the first track is finished playing. What's interesting is that I also cannot click the "Next" button (>>) in the upper left-hand corner of the iTunes window and have iTunes play the next track. If I do press the "Next" button, iTunes will instantly stop all music playback and deselect the highlighted abum (if any).
I have tried rebooting my computer and relaunching iTunes multiple times, but all trials have failed to solve the issue. In addition to restarting my computer, I have also tried reinstalling the iTunes application, but again with no luck.
I've looked through the "Preferences" menu (iTunes - Preferences) and have experimented with some of the vaious settings, but have also failed to find a solution.
In addition to my PowerBook, I have iTunes 10.5.2 running on my MacBook without any issues. The PowerPC archetecture of my PowerBook should not have anything to deal with it, should it?
Any help, suggestions, or comments regarding the issue would be greatly appreaciated.
Thank you very much.

Okay, I figured out what the problem was. I had to "check" the checkboxes along the left-hand-side of of the track names. iTunes now plays through all of the tracks like it should. :-)

Music skips to the next track in the middle of a song.

I just bought an 80gb ipod classic... seems that some of my music tends to skip to the next track without any warning. I thought it was a problem with the ipod so I returned it and got another one and it happens the same way.
Is this a syncing issue. I have updated all my software, run cache cleaners - even restored my ipod and nothing seems to help. Does anyone else have this issue?
Will converting my whole MP3 collection to AAC help this? Also would you recommend doing that?
Thanks.

I have an 8 gb ipod nano that does the same thing. The songs that have this problem skip at the same point in the song every time they play...it's pretty consistent. And it only happens when playing directly from the ipod (not from the computer). It also seems like this problem is affecting entire albums or particular artists in some cases. I've tried comparing the summaries, but healthy songs have the same attributes as the problem ones. In many cases I no longer have the original CD to be able to re-rip the songs.
Any suggestions?

RI - What if Parent is refreshed - What happens to the constraints

Hello
I have a parent-child scenario. What happens if the parent table is completely refreshed? What happens to the child table (that has cascade delete)?
If RI exists, will a complete refresh of parent be possible?
What is the best way to handle this scenario?
Thx!

One of the quickest ways of identifying duplicate records in a table is to enable a unique (or primary key) constraint knowing ahead of time that it will choke on the duplicates, but using the EXCEPTIONS INTO EXCEPTIONS clause which will cause the rowids of the duplicates to be written into an EXCEPTIONS table (created ahead of time with the rdbms\admin\utlexcpt.sql script, for example).
Therefore, imagine a million row table into which a fresh bulk load of another million rows from some external source is to be performed.
You declare the constraint, you disable it, you perform the load, you enable it exceptions into exceptions. You now can clear out the duplicate data quite easily, and then enable the constraint normally. Next load, you disable the constraint all over again and repeat the process.
That's one reason you might want to repeatedly disable/enable a constraint.
Consider another: a unique or primary key constraint, by default, when created, will cause a unique index to be created on the table. Doing any sort of bulk load into a table, even of data you know to be 'clean' of duplicates, will be a lot slower as a result of each insert having to update the index. Therefore, one of the things you commonly do to speed up bulk loads is to disable constraints, therefore removing any associated unique indexes, and therefore saving the time that would normally be spent validating data and updating indexes.
In the old days before they invented deferrable constraints, too, you might well be engaged in a complex data loading process that involves quite a few steps before finishing. If looked at during those steps, you'd say the data violated constraints... but if you just let me get to the end, you'll find that the data all comes good. So you had to be able to disable constraint checking at the start of the process, and re-enable it at the end. A good example of that is Scott's EMP table: it has a manager column and the data in that column refers to the EMPNO column. A manager has to be an employee, after all! So there's a self-referencing foreign key on that MGR column, which means you can't load a record containing a manager number that isn't already an employee. But if you were doing a bulk load of data into that table, starting with it completely empty, that would mean you'd never be able to load any data into it at all: no employees exist to begin with, so there are no managers, so the first employee record that mentions a manager gets rejected. But if only you'd let me do the initial load of data, you'd see that every manager mentioned DOES turn out to be an employee! At the end of the load, it all comes good, and everything is properly related to everything else.
Short of being very careful about the order in which you load such data (presumably, you'd have to start with Mr King, who runs the company, then deal with the first lot of managers, and then you could load the clerks and salesmen), the simplest way of resolving that sort of Catch-22 is to disable the constraint, do the load, and then enable the constraint when all the data is in place and therefore all the relationships between records have come good.
(As I say, since version 8.0 of Oracle, you can also defer the constraint so that it only gets checked at the point you commit all the data, but leaving that subtlety aside, it's still a classic example of where switching constraint checking on and off proves very useful).

My iphone 5s got stolen and the option to erase data after 10 tries was not enabled. What happens after the incorrect password is input after 10 times?

my iphone 5s got stolen and the option to erase data after 10 tries was not enabled. What happens after the incorrect password is input after 10 times?

After the sixth erroneous passcode entry a delay is imposed that increases exponentially and eventually reaches over 40 years before another attempt can be made.
No one yet knows how long the next delay is.

What happened to the "next" track command?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for