What if my processing speed is too low?

My product requirement is 2 GHz of speed, but this laptop only has 1.4. Will it still work or do i need to upgrade?

It depends on which processor it is and how many cores you have.
But, generally, I always recommend having at least twice the recommended minimums for any hardware. The 2 ghz Adobe recommends for Premiere Elements is based on a single-core Pentium. If you've got a quad-core processor, you're probably okay. A dual-core 1.4 ghz is a bit anemic for video editing -- although it also depends on which model of camcorder your video is coming from and if you're editing two-minute videos for YouTube or 1 hour videos for BluRay discs.
What model of processor do you have?
Have you downloaded the free demo and given it a test drive?

Similar Messages

My internet speed is too low. How to increase the internet speed?

I am using the broadband internet connection. I check my internet speed.
My internet speed is too low. How to increase the internet speed?
Message was edited

Hi
:D you cannot increase internet speed!!!
It depends on your internet service provider and only the ISP can increase it!
If you have some issues with the data transfer speed then I recommend contacting your internet service provider!
Bye

Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load

Hello,
I have 64 bit centOS Server and have oracle 10g installed on it.
We have 8GB RAM and 64 bit Server but we were able to install oracle on 2GB SGA only.
From few days I am facing following error:
Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load
shared servers=114, want 8 more but starting only 1 more
Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load
shared servers=114, want 8 more but starting only 1 more
Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load
shared servers=115, want 8 more but starting only 0 more
I have executed following commands:
ALTER SYSTEM SET max_shared_servers=200 SCOPE=MEMORY;
ALTER SYSTEM SET circuits=300 SCOPE=MEMORY;
But I am still getting the same error,and server average load goes too high and needs a oracle restart.
Please let me know in case any one has solution for this problem. Its urgent.
Thanks in Advance.

Sir ,
please see the output of the below query .
this error had found today early morning when rman backup get start .
SQL> show parameter process
NAME TYPE VALUE
aq_tm_processes integer 0
db_writer_processes integer 1
gcs_server_processes integer 0
job_queue_processes integer 10
log_archive_max_processes integer 2
processes integer 500
SQL> select count(*) from v$process;
COUNT(*)
93
SQL> select count(*) from v$session;
COUNT(*)
94
the error msg in the alert log file is
Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load
shared servers=1, want 1172 more but starting only 405 more
Edited by: user9353210 on Jan 4, 2011 9:30 PM

Processor Speed Slightly too low

Hello,
Whenever I watch videos they are choppy (Youtube.com, Weather.com, even listening to Pandora.com and doing other things Pandora can be choppy). After doing some troubleshooting I came across the page with System Requirements.
It says that I need a minimum "2.33GHz or faster x86-compatible processor, or Intel® Atom™ 1.6GHz or faster processor for netbooks".
I have an "AMD Sempron (tm) Processor LE-1300 2.30 GHz". I think this is probably the problem.
Is it possible for me to download a previous version which would run with this processor, or do you have any other suggestions other than replacing the processor?
Thank you for your time.

What you're describing is CPU contention. The machine isn't fast enough. We will use hardware acceleration for graphics and audio if it's available, but it sounds like we're not doing that on your system. Either the videos aren't encoded in a way that we can take advantage of hardware, or your drivers aren't supported.
There's some information here on checking that hardware acceleration is enabled and on updating your drivers:
Video playback issues
If you've done all of that and you're still stuck, there's probably not a lot you can do. Also, it's probably actually less about the speed and more about the number of cores (which allow things to be processed concurrently). Clock speeds haven't really increased, but you'll see 2.7-3.0 Ghz quad-core chips now at the high-end, instead of single-core chips. If cost is an issue, there are some really nice Chromebooks in the $2-300 range that would be more than adequate.

Read this when your memory speed seems too low

You noticed that your memory is not running at the speed that you expected and you are wondering
why that is. Here is the most likely answer to that.
Many monitoring programs don't show you the double data rate (DDR) of your memory. So, first, multiply your memory frequency by 2 to get the double data rate. For example, when using PC4300 ram, you get a memory frequency of 267MHz, in stead of 533MHz. 266 is only half the speed of 533, so your monitoring program shows single data rate, not double. With PC3200 it goes 200/400MHz, etc.
The second thing you should consider is the following. The combination of certain memory frequencies and CPU-speeds make it impossible for the memory/cpu to run at full data rate specified by the memory manufacturer. I'll take my own system as an example to show what I mean.
- 2 Opterons 2212, running at 2000MHz.
- PC4300 memory installed. Maximum speed is 267 (single data rate) or 533 (double data rate) MHz.
Now, the following happens: To get the right memory clock speed, the cpu speed is divided by a number. In this case, it would be:
2000/266=7.5 .
This outcome is not possible for the CPU. It needs a round (solid) number. In this case the choice is between 7 and 8. However, when using 7, chances are that the system will not run stable, because the outcome is higher than the memory can handle (guarenteed):
2000/7=286MHz (572MHz DDR).
So, the higher numer (8) is chosen, giving this result:
2000/8=250MHz (500MHz DDR).
In my case, CPU-Z reports a data rate of about 250MHz. Note the first remark I made: you need to
multiply by 2, to get the doube data rate (DDR) speed: 500MHz.
If you oc the cpu speed slightly, memory speed will increase a bit as well. Example: when overclocking the cpu to about 2125MHz, the memory will start running at the speed it can handle:
2125/8=266MHz (533MHz DDR).

Does the number of memory chips affect this behavior? I have two 1GB PC3200 chips for my MSI KT8 Neo FISR. When I run each one separately, it registers as 200MHz (DDR400) in memtest86. When run together, they register as 100MHz (DDR200). This alarms me to no end, but it sounds like this is expected, yes? If so, why do they "appear" to run at full speed singly, but half-speed running together? And will the actual speed of the two running together match the speed of one by itself (otherwise, I'll see a performance hit when upgrading from 1GB to 2BG)?
Sorry for the newbie-sounding question, but memory's been over my head since my 72-pin's went out of style
Thank you
= Eric

Speed 700mhz too low for iPhoto 8?

I would like to upgrade to iPhoto 8 from my present iPhoto 4, but notice the minimum speed is 733mhz. As I only have 700mhz, does this mean iPhoto 8 would not work at all? Would I be better to go to something between 4 and 8? Would appreciate comments. Thank you.

I would like to upgrade to iPhoto 8 from my present iPhoto 4, but notice the minimum speed is 733mhz.
That requirement is for iDVD and doesn't apply to iPhoto, iWeb, or GarageBand.
(37815)

Running rman with virtual tape speed too low(500KB/s approx)

Hey guys, I run rman with mhvtl. but the backup speed is too low(500kB/s).
the mhvtl debugging prints indicate that the block size is 64kB and the scsi command is running synchronous.
does any one know how to speed up this backup operation?<smiley image='anim_crazy.gif'/>
Thanks.
<b>my system:</b>
linux kernel 2.6.18
mhvtl 0.18.17
oracle10
obtool 10.2
<b>rman configure:</b>
RMAN> show all;
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
RMAN configuration parameters are:
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO REDUNDANCY 1; # default
CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION OFF; # default
CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO 'SBT_TAPE';
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP OFF; # default
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO '/backup1/ctl_%F';
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE SBT_TAPE TO '%F'; # default
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK PARALLELISM 2 BACKUP TYPE TO BACKUPSET;
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE 'SBT_TAPE' BACKUP TYPE TO BACKUPSET PARALLELISM 1;
CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE SBT_TAPE TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE SBT_TAPE TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE CHANNEL 1 DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT '/backup1/backup_%U';
CONFIGURE CHANNEL 2 DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT '/backup2/backup_%U';
CONFIGURE CHANNEL DEVICE TYPE 'SBT_TAPE' MAXOPENFILES 1 PARMS '';
CONFIGURE MAXSETSIZE TO UNLIMITED; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION FOR DATABASE OFF; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM 'AES128'; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO NONE; # default
CONFIGURE SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE NAME TO '/home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/dbs/snapcf_orcl.f'; # default

skoczo wrote:What services could i disable?
anything you don't need at startup.
If you disable systemd service from startup, you will lose some kind of functionality, and you should try to figure out yourself whether you need that functionality of not.
If you use pulseaudio (I assume you do, since it looks like you're using gnome), you can safely disable alsa-restore.service and alsa-store.service, as pulseaudio will restore audio levels by itself.
I've masked systemd-vconsole-setup.service myself (disabling isn't enought), since I rarely use virtual console on ttys. I don't have correct keymap on ttys but that's not a big deal for me.
I don't think you need all those @backlight services either. I've personally masked all but one on my system.
e4rat will most likely reduce your start up time greatly, although it's a bit of a hassle to set up.
systemd-readahead might also help, but you should test it for yourself.
I'm also thinking you could probably optimize your initramfs a bit, as 11s is quite long for loading kernel. At least make sure you have 'autodetect' hook enabled in mkinitcpio.conf.
Also you can use lz4hc for compressing initramfs (COMPRESSION="lz4" and COMPRESSION_OPTIONS="-9" in mkinitcpio.conf), which should be faster on decompression than other algorithms.
There are some more tips in arch wiki, if you didn't check it out already

After ios7 update my iphone is like android os dead slow processing , too fast battery drain,calling process is too low where is apple brand going my friends 11 members using iphone all are got this problem one thing fans like me y they spoil his name ??

after ios7 update my iphone 4 is like android os dead slow processing , too fast battery drain,calling process is too low where is apple brand going my friends 11 members using iphone all are got this problem one thing apple have unique and unique fans like me why they spoil their name like this update iam too disappointed iam not say for oppose apple iam say for feedback to grow apple in world because i love apple more please solve it
by real customers
iPhone 4, iOS 7, iam apple suporter

please help me after ios7 update my phone is tooo slowww i want my old iphone

Hard Drive low on disk space - What is the process of moving B1 Server App?

The partition the SAP B1 Server App is installed on is running low on disk space. I would like to move the APP from the D:\ to a new, faster, hard disk we have installed.
What is the process for uninstalling and reinstalling the server app to a new partition.
Is there any documentation that outlines this process?
What are concerns I should have for doing this?
Any and all info is appreciated.
John Sefton

Fine. Then Backup the Client Database from SQL Server Management Studio.
Backup the B1_SHR folder from the SAP Server.
Now uninstall SAP B1 from the Server.
Restart the Server and do a Fresh Installation of SAP B1.
Apply for New License Key. Install the License Key after you get from SAP portal.
Upgrade to the Patch similar to that of the Backuped Client DB Patch.
Now create a new company in SAP B1.
Restore the DB which was backed up.
NOTE: I suggest these operations to be done by experienced guys. If you are a SBO Customer, then I recommend you to ask your Implementation Partner to do this exercise.

Broad band speeds abysmal what's the process in ge...

How long before broad band speeds start to increase on a new connection had three days and speeds are abysmal what’s the process in getting things improved without being hit with isp usually bs speeds at present Download Speed 0.46 Mbps 0 Mbps 21 Mbps Max Achievable Speed Download speedachieved during the test was - 0.46 Mbps For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 4 Mbps-21 Mbps. IP Profile for your line is - 11.88 Mbps 2. Upstream Test: -provides background information. Upload Speed 0.98 Mbps 0 Mbps 0.83 Mbps Max Achievable Speed

Speed seams better this eve is there a settling in period ?
btspeedtester results
. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
Download Speed
11.56 Mbps
0 Mbps 21 Mbps
Max Achievable Speed
Download speedachieved during the test was - 11.56 Mbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 4 Mbps-21 Mbps.
IP Profile for your line is - 11.88 Mbps
2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
Upload Speed
0.88 Mbps
0 Mbps 0.83 Mbps
Max Achievable Speed
Upload speed achieved during the test was - 0.88Mbps
Additional Information:
Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 0.83 Mbps
hub last connected to internet and they will show your connection speed and noise margin
A/ 13:32:07, 15 Sep. ( 3866.130000) DSL is up
13:32:05, 15 Sep. ( 3864.680000) DSL noise margin: 6.00 dB upstream, 6.10 dB downstream
13:32:04, 15 Sep. ( 3863.750000) DSL line rate: 1151 Kbps upstream, 13528 Kbps downstream
Was btspeedtester done using a wired or wireless connection?
A/wired connection
are you connected directly via a filter to the NTE5 master or test socket or to somewhere else?
A/ connected directly to BT FTTC (VDSL2) Faceplate (RJ11 socket) to to BT Home Hub 4 Router
Is the master the only phone socket in your home?
A/ yes master only socket
Have you tried the quiet line test? - dial 17070 option 2 - should hear nothing - best done with a corded phone. if cordless phone you may hear a 'dull hum' which is normal
A/ Yes quiet line test fine no noise

The sample rate in my code is too low. Is there a way to make it run faster?

Dear Sir,
    I am a LabVIEW customer, and just have a question about LabVIEW.
    We are running a code of "Wirebonder Project", but find the sample rate is too low. I'm wondering if there is a way to make it run faster. (I have
attached the code here.)
   Thank you very much!
Yours Sincerely,
Xian Zhang
Attachments:
Wirebonder_Project_Code.zip ‏169 KB

Hi Xian,
What system are you running this code on and are you using the LabVIEW Real-Time Module? There is a presentation online on Optimizing and Benchmarking Real-Time code with useful related links as well as other articles in the DevZone on things like Benchmarking an Application Using LabVIW Real-Time and DAQmx.
As you can see, this is not a simple question, so take a look at the information in these links and see if you can narrow down what in your code is running slowly and how much you might be able to improve the speed.
Regards,Stephen S.
National Instruments
Applications Engineering

Price too low (below tolerance limit of 10%)

Hello,
I am facing the below error while processing of MIRO. The error detail is as below:
Price too low (below tolerance limit of 10.00 %)
Message no. M8085
Diagnosis
The invoice price (value invoiced divided by the quantity invoiced) varies too greatly from the net order price.
Note:
The category of this message can be changed in Customizing for Invoice Verification. This means that you can receive a message as an error message even though it is defined as a warning message in the standard system.
The following documentation deals with the case applicable to the standard system only.
System Response
The system has established that the value invoiced is below the expected price (quantity invoiced * net order price) by more than the tolerance for price variances (10.00 %) set in the Customizing system.
Procedure
Check what you have entered and make any necessary corrections.
Please suggest.
JK

Dear,
The tolerance keys that you have mentioned are to do with Invoice verificationion tolerances. In most cases the comparison is with the PO, which brings the line items in the invoice verification screen in MIRO.
Check the transaction code OMR6...
Ex:
On percentage lower limit
Check limit : Checked
PercLowerAccLim : %
On percentage upper limit
Check limit : Checked
PercUpperAccLim : %

Please help! Is my IP profile too low and thus red...

Hi all,
My broadband connection seems particularly slow.
Is my IP profile too low and thus reducing my broadband speed?
Greatly appreciate any help here!
If it is the IP profile, how do I get it improved? Contact a moderator?
Here is the result from speedtester.net
Download speedachieved during the test was - 661 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 200-1000 Kbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :0 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 0 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 750 Kbps
However here is what my router says:
ADSL line status
Connection information
Line state
Connected
Connection time
1 day, 1:29:10
Downstream
6,848 Kbps
Upstream
448 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
ITU-T G.992.1
Latency type
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)
8.1 dB / 26.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
27.0 dB / 12.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
19.8 dBm / 12.4 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local)
0
Loss of Signal (Local)
0
Loss of Power (Local)
0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
435241 / 0
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
479 / 2147480000
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
nil / 0
Error Seconds (Local)
135
Solved!
Go to Solution.

just leave your router connected 24/7 for 3/5 days and the profile will come back to normal on it's own
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Audio is fine in Final Cut Pro but too low in Soundtrack Pro.

ok here goes! I'm using STP to clean up audio, road noise, fan noise, little buzz, and so on. I have a problem; the play back audio is low, so it makes it hard to hear to clean it. Has anyone else had this problem? I'm using a G4 17 power book, with final cut studio. I have done all of the upgraded as far as I know. Anyone have any ideas. The volume is very loud on the time line. The problem is when I send the clip toSTP from FCP. I right click and the window opens and go to send to STP audio project it ask me save or rename the clip. The clip opens in STP, I hit the play button and the volume was fine in FCP is now too low to hear in STP. It seems to play well if I send it to STP mulititrack file project. However when I try to send the track to audio file project. the audio is so low that it unusable. Help
Power book G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Hi Lorenzo,
I haven't encountered this problem, however it sounds to me as though the waveform editor is sensing that the incoming signal is too hot & is automatically pulling down the gain to compensate and overcompensating to the point where the audio is barely intelligible.
What I would suggest you try is:
Select All Command (Apple) A then
Shift Command L. This gives you a window that allows you to boost the level. As the signal is so low, try 100%. If the signal is still too low do the same again. The Adjust Amplitude Filters will appear in the Actions List to the left of the Waveform. This is a nondestructive process & each Adjust Amplitude can be toggled on/off by unchecking it so that you can do a before & after comparison.
All the best
Dave

HomeFusion 4G/LTE data caps way too low!!! Please raise them!!

I've had HomeFusion 4G/LTE since January 5th and I absolutely love the speed and low latency over satellite. There's just one big problem that I'm really disturbed about and that's the extremely low data cap it has. I'm paying $135 a month for the 30GB package and I've already hit 25GB in just over 2 weeks. I've watched no movies other than what videos I watch on YouTube. I've downloaded no movies or software in ISO format. I have played WOW a few hours over the past couple of weeks but that uses very little data.
This HomeFusion is being used by a family household and I can tell you that unless I just tell everyone to just not use the internet, there's no way 30GB is going to be enough data. Supposedly for the first 2 months I'm on some kind of promotional period that actually gives me 45GB, but then it's suppose to drop down to the 30GB thereafter.
If VZW doesn't raise the caps to real world usage expectations, then I'm going to be spending $300 a month on this connection just to get the extra 15GB that's being offered during the promotional period. That's $10 per 1GB over your limit, which 15GB is $150, then added to the $135 already which will be $285 plus taxes.. That's outrageous for a fixed 4G/LTE connection to my house.
I'm out in the sticks and probably 1 of only a few that are using the tower for the 4G/LTE it offers. I seriously doubt I'm causing any congestion with how I use my connection.
Hopefully there are other HomeFusion customers that see the need for VZW to amp up the data caps to something more realistic at around 100GB.
Recently an article came out showing that the ISPs were using data caps to solely monetize data usage and it had nothing to do with congestion.
http://www.techspot.com/news/51392-former-fcc-chair-isp-data-caps-are-about-monetization-not-network-congestion.html
Isn't $135 for a 4G/LTE connection at home already too much?? Come on VZW, please raise the data caps or better yet, eliminate them and just charge for the connection.

TexasRebel wrote:
Man..spare me the `there's only so much bandwidth to go around' speech. I live out in a podunk town that is serviced by AT&T, Verizon and Sprint, along with all the other smaller carriers. There's maybe like a dozen people in my area that might even have HomeFusion and that's because they are crazy enough to shell out $60-$120 a month for a better internet experience than satellite.
Just because YOUR area has few people doesn't mean that what Verizon should base pricing on. Verizon has standardize pricing. So they have to price for ALL areas.
I just want more data than the 30GB,, because number 1, HomeFusion is marketed as a home residential service. It's not like there are thousands of smart phones like in a mid-sized city accessing it. It's a broadband product that is marketed for family use. 30GB is a joke to give a family, when whoever it is that runs the HomeFusion department knows that a family can easily eat up 100GB if everyone were to stream movies and play games. 100GB would be more than enough for the HomeFusion subscriber that has to pay $150 just for internet. LTE is delivering 40+Mbps where I'm located.. I would settle for 10Mbps for my needs.
LTE is not a replacement for REAL internet. That's just factual. So if yo want REAL internet you'll have to move where it is. Maybe that's not fair but that's the reality. Maybe in a couple of years you can get more than 30 GB.
If Verizon is so concerned about bandwidth consumption, then use QoS metrics to balance out the bandwidth to everyone connected to a specific tower if congestion is detected.. You act like if someone uses 100GB of data over a wireless connection it's eating up all the available bandwidth a tower might have.. Not really. Suppose that 100GB is being scheduled to download at late night when the network is generally idle??
Ok then everyone will get 500 kbps. How does that sound?
I've had both Exede and Hughesnet Gen4. Fast they are, but they pull the same crap that the wireless carriers are pulling.. Claiming that people who use too much data are congesting their networks.. That's a load of crap. What's congesting the network is having low bandwidth and having too many people eating up that bandwidth to download content.. If you have 50Mbps wireless that download takes a fraction of the time it would take someone with 3-5Mbps. They get what they want fast and the available bandwidth becomes free again for whoever else may need it.
Just like mobile they are bandwidth constrained. You can belive what you want. Not believing the truth doesn't make it not true. 2+2=4 no matter how much you want it to equal 5.
It's basically called control. The carriers want control of what you can do on their networks. It used to be subscribers just paid for the connection fee and they did what they wanted. But ever since carriers thought they could monetize data usage and there's no law for them to not do it, they do whatever they want, squeezing the customer for more and more money...
Even if what you said was 100% true there is nothing you can do about it. Coming here to complain certainly won't do anything. Your choice is to either pay or not to pay.
VZW has 115 million subscribers.. do the math. They make billions each month. They make more than enough money to put back into their network to increase capacity. So does AT&T. If either carrier doesn't want their wireless networks to become too congested, then start upgrading their wireline services to fiber/cable instead of claiming they are dumping wireline services and pushing people to wireless..
Actually they do invest in their networks. They spend billions each year. Verizon has 20 MHz total for LTE right now. 10 for uplink 10 for downlink. That has to be share with Homefusion and mobile data customers both residential and business. Spectrum is a finite resource. It will take time to acquire and deploy it. Try doing some research on how mobile technology works before question the validity of what I'm saying. I did the research you should too. My posts are based on FACTS not wishes or conspiracy theories..

What if my processing speed is too low?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for