What is a Guest LAN?

My company is currently in the process of creating a guest wireless ssid for vendors. I have already created the VLAN on our network and configured it with an ACL so that it can only get to the internet and no where else.
I am now going through creating an interface on my lwapp controllers and there is a check box that says "Guest LAN". Now the guide that I am using to configure my controllers is for an older version of WCS (I can't find one for 5.1). And they do not check the Guest LAN.
I am just curious as to what this setting actually does.
Thanks

It has been a few months since I looked in to this and I never got around to implementing it, but I'll see if I can help any.
This "Guest LAN" allows you to use your Wireless Controllers as an anchor point for Wired Users.
When I was looking in to this, I was going to anchor a Layer 2 VLAN to an internal controller and have that controller anchor those clients to my DMZ Controller just like I do with my "wireless guest" access.
In theory it allows the Wireless Controller to pick up your Wired clients and treat them like your Wireless clients.
So, trunk an unrouted VLAN into that controller and let the controller do the dirty work....
I'm going to create a post on this in the general forum about an idea I once had with this....

Similar Messages

  • Guest LAN and WLAN on Controller

    Hi,
    While creating new ssid, i can see the option guest lan and wlan, whats the difference? which one is preffered?
    Thanks in advance..

    Hi,
    I remember answering this few days and also George joined the thread.. or max week back..
    Guest LAN WLAN =
    1> The clients connecting to the WLAN will have a time limit on the connectivity, for example you can configure the Guest WLAN for 24 hours or something which you want..
    2> I guess George pointed this in the previous thread.. Can be used for Wired Guest Users configuration as well , here is the link..
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008070ba8f.shtml
    WLAN =
    Just nothing but a SSID with security which doesnt have any time limit.
    which one is preffered? =
    Its your network and what ever meets your requirements you can use that.. however both of them does its job with different features involved.
    lemme know if this answered your question..
    Regards
    Surendra
    ====
    Please dont forget to rate the posts which answered your question and mark it as answered or was helpfull

  • Guest LAN and DHCP Options not passing through

    Managed to get the Guest LAN up and running for wired clients and all's working well.  Users are sat behind a proxy and if I force the use of a appropriate wpad file I can get the WLC auth to happen and then push off to the proxy.
    I'm trying to use option 252 in DHCP to present the WPAD url.  Only issue that happens is that while the DHCP server on the egress interface is handing out addresses to clients on the ingress interface correctly, the WLC doesn't appear to be handing through the option 252 I have set in DHCP.  I've used network monitor to see what the dhcp request process is dishing out in terms of options, and all look good if I'm not behind the WLC.
    Anyone know if theres a limitation on the WLC that prevents DHCP options being passed through to the guest LAN?
    TIA

    When configured as a DHCP server, some of the firewalls do not support DHCP requests from a relay agent. The WLC is a relay agent for the client. The firewall configured as a DHCP server ignores these requests. Clients must be directly connected to the firewall and cannot send requests through another relay agent or router. The firewall can work as a simple DHCP server for internal hosts that are directly connected to it. This allows the firewall to maintain its table based on the MAC addresses that are directly connected and that it can see. This is why an attempt to assign addresses from a DHCP relay are not available and the packets are discarded. PIX Firewall has this limitation.
    For more information please refer to the link-http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008070ba8f.shtml

  • What is the guest four in ipod touch

    how to get rid of it????

    What is "this guest four"
    You need to clarify your question/problem.

  • Routed network using VRF and WLC Webaccess for Guest LAN

    I have a guest lan that uses a seperate VRF on my network. That guest LAN needs to get services and access the internet via the WLC.
    I cannot assign an IP address on the ingress port of the WLC which doesn't allow me to setup an IP-Helper or a next hop for traffic via the WLC. Since the ingress and egress are on different vlan's somehow i need to route the traffic to the egress.
    Using the VRF doesn't allow me to create a route like "ip route VRF Guest 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 gig 1/5" or "ip route VRF Guest 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 vlan 5"
    Any ideas?                    

    Does the L3 interface on your router or L3 switch look anything like this?
    interface Vlan119
    description GUEST VLAN
    ip vrf forwarding GUEST
    ip address 172.16.254.2 255.255.252.0
    ip helper-address 172.16.255.1
    no ip redirects
    no ip proxy-arp
    glbp 119 ip 172.16.254.1
    glbp 119 timers 2 7
    glbp 119 priority 150
    glbp 119 preempt delay minimum 600
    glbp 119 authentication md5 key-string 7 1326431F1B1917232203
    glbp 119 forwarder preempt delay minimum 3600
    load-interval 30
    end
    This is an edited version of an L3 interface in a 6509 hosting a WiSM.  The WiSM guest interface is in this subnet.  The helper points to NAC.  Clients in this subnet are NAT'd to public IPs when heading out to the Internet.

  • WLC 2100 series Guest LAN not found

    Hi there
    I am unable to configure Guest LAN as in this link
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a00808ed026.shtml
    because my Cisco WLC 2112 version 7.0.240.0 does not have the option for Guest LAN. Is Guest LAN supported for WLC 2100 series? Any workarounds or suggestions?
    Thanks for your help
    DIego

    Diego,
    Wired guest access is not supported on WLC2106.
    Reference:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a00808ed026.shtml#configs
    consider using a WISM, WLC4400, 3750 integrated WLC or a WLC5500

  • Cisco 4402 Guest lan and product lan DHCP assignment

    I'm currently setting up a wirless lan with a Cisco 4402 Wireless Lan Controller and 1 cisco 1242AG Access points.
    All the devices include:
    Cisco catalyst 6505
    Cisco 4402
    D-Link broadband router
    Connection between them:
    6505 trunking with 4402 (dot1q and trunk vlan 1 and vlan 3, but i found that all vlan on the 6506 will trunk together), wlan 1 is production lan while vlan 3 is Guest lan)
    6505 vlan 3 is connecting to D-Link broadband router as a guest lan
    both vlan 1 and vlan 3 have DHCP server for production PC and guest notebook respectively.
    On 4402, i have two interfaces and 2 WLAN. one interface for production lan pointing DHCP server to product DHCP address and the other interface for guest lan, which pointing to guest lan DHCP server.
    when a notebook connec to guest lan, it will assign an address from guest DHCP server, while connecting to production lan, a production IP will be assigned last week. But the things change w/o changing the structure, when i connect to guest lan SSID, the ip suppose assign by the Guest lan DHCP, but it failed, the notebook got ip address from production lan.
    Is it trunking makes those all Vlan "mixed", and get ip from the DHCP server with faster respone time?
    How can i make sure when i connect to guest lan, the ip will be assigned from Guest Lan DHCP server and vice versa?
    Many thanks!

    Here is the URL for the Cisco Guest Access Using the Cisco Wireless LAN Controller which will help you :
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/technology/guest_access/technical/reference/4.0/GAccess.html

  • How to set up a guest LAN? (small business, simple environment)

    First before getting into my actual post, please allow me to briefly express my sincere aggravation at this Cisco website for it's lack of proper IE 11 support.  When I try to create a forum post, well, there is no way to do it.  The old Create a Discussion link is gone (actually when I log into my profile, the entire Actions pane is gone).  The Ask a Question thing you first see is terrible, it doesn't support IE 11 apparently because the message body field is just gone.  I can put a Title, and tags, but there is no field.  there's also no compatibility mode button anywhere in the IE 11 interface one this site.  I was lucky in that the Actions pane shows up when you click on another person's post.  I don't think Cisco realizes how absolutely annoying that kind of thing is. 
    I have a single 192.168.0.0/24 LAN with a single Cisco SG300 series switch to aggregate all the network connections, a single gateway firewall/router to the Internet, and a few wireless access points on the same LAN.  These are the AP541N's.  My goal is to set up guest Wi-Fi, but have it that guests cannot see or access the internal network. 
    Haven't not actually done this before, I have no idea where to proceed.  I know I can create guest virtual AP's in the AP541N but that doesn't do anything to prevent a guest device from having full access to all of 192.168.0.0/24 computers. 
    What can I do?  Do I have to put in completely new hardware?  Should I be contacting the Cisco Small Business tech support group if the specifics are unique to the SG300 and AP541N models? 
    Any help is appreciated, both general advice but ideally a full solution reply can be possible :)

    Hi Valley ITPC,
    Here are some suggestions regarding the IE11 issue from the support team:
    How to off compatibility mode on IE 11 by following the instructions given on the link below:
    Assuming its IE11 on Win 7. http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/internet-explorer/use-compatibility-view#ie=ie-11-win-7
    if not use this link http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/internet-explorer/use-compatibility-view#ie=ie-11
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Cindy
    Cisco Small Business Community Manager
    www.cisco.com/go/smallbizsupport
    twitter: CiscoSBsupport

  • What's the maximum LAN speed with the Thunderbolt to Gigabit Ethernet Adapter on my MacBook Pro?

    While I was at Yodobashi Camera yesterday, I got a Thunderbolt to Gigabit ethernet adapter for my MacBook Pro. I figure, since I'm paying for the high speed fiber optic (Sony Nuro), why limit my self to wi-fi speeds at home?
    Before connecting the adapter, via wi-fi it the speed was 143.8 Mbps down and 181.5 Mbps up.
    After connecting the adapter and making a direct LAN connection to the router, the speed is 783.2 Mbps down and 940.1 Mbps up.
    I'm certainly happy with the speed, but since Sony Nuro is supposed to be 2 Gbps down and 1 Gbps up I was wondering what the maximum possible is with this computer and adapter. Before asking the provider I was curious what the maximum specs where.
    The ether cable is a 3 m category 6.
    Thanks,
    doug

    It's not really your computer that is getting the 2Gbps download - it is the router/ modem.
    If you hooked better/ different hardware up you could probably push those speeds around your network too. The trouble is that most residential hardware is gigabit ethernet not fibre. Fibre cards & cable are expensive in comparison.
    The existing hardware may allow you to 'bond or aggregate' multiple ethernet connections into one link to get more speed over ethernet. Obviously this requires more complex routers, switches & a network admin to set it up
    Those speeds sound nice, this bottleneck will mean that other devices on you network can't choke up the whole connection & make other users sad.

  • What is in 'Guest' folders?

    I am trying to clean out clutter from my computer and came upon the 'Users' folder in the hard drive. Within the Users folder there are three folders: Guest then me (my name and icon of a house) then Shared. I clicked on Guest folder and there are several folders with seemingly generic names. (See screenshot). I tried opening them and it says I do not have permission to open them. What's up with that? I'm the only one who uses this computer. What is in them and why can't I access them and can I delete them? Thank you.

    They are there to allow someone temporary access to your computer but limits that access to the Shared folder. It's there for a purpose, and it is not intended to be deleted, so please leave it alone.

  • DHCP issues for Wired Guest LAN

    Hi Everyone,
    I've a 1751 acting as a DHCP server for client PCs on a guest network A.B.8.x (using an Anchor controller) on the DMZ of my firewall. The 1751 reports the following
    Nov 30 15:35:45: DHCPD: DHCPDISCOVER received from client 0100.1708.37a3.55 through relay A.B.7.y.
    Nov 30 15:42:41: DHCPD: there is no address pool for A.B.7.y.
    I'd tied my guest vlan and corresponding DHCP scope on the router to A.B.8.x, but as A.B.7.x is the DHCP relay for the Anchor controller I don't understand why the DHCP server on the router is not doing what I expected it to.
    As ever any help will be appreciated.
    Many Thanks
    Scott

    Hi Cristian,
    After much pulling of hair and gnashing of teeth I have got it working - what was not clear to me, and it looks as though you've fallen into the same trap, is that the egress interface on the anchor controller (ie the management port) defines the addresses given to the clients. The dhcp scope on your server has to be from the same network as the address of the management interface (so my guest clients get a A.B.7.x address). In fact the ingress interface addresses have no bearing (as I'm sure I read somewhere afterwards!) on how the guest access operates and can (should?) be dummy addresses.
    I tried creating another vlan (with A.B.8.x) on the anchor controller and assigning that to the egress of the guest WLAN on the anchor and I could get A.B.8.x addresses from my DHCP server as I had planned, but, and this is a big but, web authentication just will not instigate. So it would seem that guest access is reliant on using the management interface as the egress on the anchor of the guest WLAN.
    I hope this is helpful,
    Regards
    Scott

  • What are the guests on Visual Admin- security provider- user logon sessions

    I see many guests on there.
    What are they corresponding to?
    Thanks!

    I'm not sure but check who is associated with guest security role.
    Also check this link: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/77/b7013f9ea7d861e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Cheers,
    Mustafa

  • What is the "Guest" on Visual Admin's- security provider- login sessions ?

    If I get into the Visual Administrator -> security provider->login sessions, I see many users called "Guest" there.
    Could you help map those users to actual services.
    Also there could be many users called "Administrator" , how to map them to actual services?
    Thanks a lot!

    This might be helpful to understand the role of Guest user.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/9f/d770424edcc553e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    -Pinkle

  • Wired guest lan authentication through NGS

    Hello Guys,
    We have 5508 controller running ver 7.2.110.0.We have configured wireless guest and wired guest WLAN profiles and assosicated necessary dynamic interfaces to it. The authentication for both wireless and wired guest is through Cisco NGS[NAC]. I have configured Webauth and added the server in the security tab for authentication. I have guest user accounts created in NGS, if I use wirless guest the auth works perfect. But the same credentials is not working with wired guest. Any advice on this issue would be really helpful
    Regards
    Krishna

    Hey Scott,
    Yes NGS is working as Radius. However I haven't checked on WLC neither NGS log to see if there is any but let me look into that. No other names also doesn't work. I did run a debug on WLC while the user was authenticating below is the output
    Output of debug for wireless user where I am getting Accept message for auth at the end
    User IP ADDR - 172.22.207.157
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00:23:14:ec:3d:38 Successful transmission of Authentication Packet (id 190) to 194.156.169.111:1812, proxy state 00:23:14:ec:3d:38-00:01
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000000: 01 be 00 a2 cd 8f 91 44  a2 4f 85 f1 04 f7 14 9a  .......D.O......
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000010: d0 3e 42 94 01 1b 6d 61  68 65 62 6f 6f 62 2e 6b  .>B...maheboob.k
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000020: 68 61 6e 40 61 6d 61 64  65 75 73 2e 63 6f 6d 02  [email protected].
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000030: 12 34 fc 96 01 47 ed 5e  d3 8d 08 4e 72 ce 1d b5  .4...G.^...Nr...
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000040: da 06 06 00 00 00 01 04  06 ac 16 cf 83 05 06 00  ................
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000050: 00 00 0d 20 0b 42 4c 52  57 4c 43 4f 30 31 3d 06  .....BLRWLCO01=.
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000060: 00 00 00 13 1a 0c 00 00  37 63 01 06 00 00 00 01  ........7c......
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000070: 1f 10 31 37 32 2e 32 32  2e 32 30 37 2e 31 35 37  ..172.22.207.157
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000080: 1e 10 31 37 32 2e 32 32  2e 32 30 37 2e 31 33 31  ..172.22.207.131
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 00000090: 50 12 ef 00 53 8b 39 31  14 93 b3 82 1c f5 b5 51  P...S.91.......Q
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:44:29.940: 000000a0: 82 45                                             .E
    *radiusTransportThread: Aug 20 09:44:30.516: 00000000: 02 be 00 1a 0c 8e d4 54  91 55 d6 ae b2 91 05 6e  .......T.U.....n
    *radiusTransportThread: Aug 20 09:44:30.516: 00000010: 93 f9 4b 7e 1b 06 00 21  70 70                    ..K~...!pp
    *radiusTransportThread: Aug 20 09:44:30.517: ****Enter processIncomingMessages: response code=2
    *radiusTransportThread: Aug 20 09:44:30.517: ****Enter processRadiusResponse: response code=2
    *radiusTransportThread: Aug 20 09:44:30.517: 00:23:14:ec:3d:38 Access-Accept received from RADIUS server 194.156.169.111 for mobile 00:23:14:ec:3d:38 receiveId = 0
    But for wired user below is the output
    User IP ADDR - 172.22.207.151
    5.338: 00:26:b9:e0:36:a6 Successful transmission of Authentication Packet (id 188) to 194.156.169.111:1812, proxy state 00:26:b9:e0:36:a6-00:01
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000000: 01 bc 00 a2 2c fe c1 97  a7 d1 25 a0 59 34 89 38  ....,.....%.Y4.8
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000010: c1 be 59 f3 01 1b 6d 61  68 65 62 6f 6f 62 2e 6b  ..Y...maheboob.k
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000020: 68 61 6e 40 61 6d 61 64  65 75 73 2e 63 6f 6d 02  [email protected].
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000030: 12 37 c7 5c 52 27 41 5b  0d 60 98 70 76 3b b3 ba  .7.\R'A[.`.pv;..
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000040: f5 06 06 00 00 00 01 04  06 ac 16 cd 74 05 06 00  ............t...
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000050: 00 00 0d 20 0b 42 4c 52  57 4c 43 4f 30 31 3d 06  .....BLRWLCO01=.
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000060: 00 00 00 0f 1a 0c 00 00  37 63 01 06 00 00 02 02  ........7c......
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000070: 1f 10 31 37 32 2e 32 32  2e 32 30 37 2e 31 35 31  ..172.22.207.151
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000080: 1e 10 31 37 32 2e 32 32  2e 32 30 35 2e 31 31 36  ..172.22.205.116
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 00000090: 50 12 36 60 54 47 0b 84  02 5c 0b da 19 a1 05 eb  P.6`TG...\......
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:15.338: 000000a0: af 2b                                             .+
    *aaaQueueReader: Aug 20 09:35:17.053: AuthenticationRequest: 0x2ab12b50

  • WLC - Layer 3 Wired guest lan ?

    Hello
    Has anyone been able to do this with a WLC, configuration guidlines say :"
    "Wired guest access ports must be in the same Layer 2 network as the foreign controller."
    Anyone know if Cisco is working on making this solution work on L3 aswell ?
    Regards,
    Gk

    Hi gudmundurk,
    I'm not sure if they would consider it worth developing as you would have to create a tunnel between the guest vlan's gateway and the subnet that the controller is on to keep your network secure anyway. Unless someone out there knows..........
    Regards
    Scott

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to solve Error DW030 during CS6 installation (Mavericks)?

    This computer (running Mac OS 10.10.1) needs a way to install Acrobat from the CS6 DVD. The CS6 installation went well except for Acrobat, where it gave error DW030. Unfortunately, following the instructions to reboot in Safe Mode deleted the detaile

  • IPhoto corrupt in all drive disks.

    I installed iLife 9 and have been using iPhoto 8.1.1 successfully, in conjunction with iPhoto Library Manager, in several volumes. Quite suddenly I have found the application corrupted in all of them: when I try to open any with any library it will o

  • Report Painter:  Rearranging of Characteristics

    Hello Everyone, Could anyone help me out in rearranging characteristic in Report Painter. As per clients requirement the report should split values of Cost Center into Activity Type and then Cost Components. However, I am getting report in Reverse wa

  • Changing socket server config at runtime

    Is it possible to modify properties of a socket server at runtime without needing to change the xml? For example, if I wanted to change something like connection-idle-timeout-minutes from 120 to 60, could I do it without modifying the following xml b

  • Pass variables to child via C# script task ?

    I don't want to use package configurations to pass variables from Parent to child package. I'd prefer to pass the variables to child, from a  C# script task in the parent package. Can this be done ? Here is the pseudocode for what I hope to do -  //c