What is a time based scenario in TDMS?

We need only to transfer the data from the last 90 days.
We know we should use time based scenario. However we cannot find instruction how to implement this scenario.
Could you help? Thanks!

Hi
Describing how to do time based reduction using TDMS will not be possible over this medium. It is recommended that you refer to the TDMS guides (specifically the Solution operation guide). Refer to the following thread for the same -
Links, Documents, Support Pack Schedule
However i will brief you some steps - Once you are on the TDMS overview screen do the following steps -
1) create project
2) create sub-project
3) create package (use the option "initial package for time based reduction from the popup")
4) once the package screen appears execute various activities of the package in correct order. Detailed documentation for each activity is available on the package screen.
I hope this helps
Pankaj

Similar Messages

Sales orders in TDMS company/time based reduction are outside the scope

Guys,
I have had some issues with TDMS wheras it didn't handle company codes without plants very well. That was fixed by SAP. But I have another problem now. If I do a company code and time based reduction, It doesn't seem to affect my sales orders in VBAK/VBUK as I would have expected. I was hoping it would only copy sales orders across that have a plant which is assigned to a company code that was specified in the company code based reduction scenario. That doesn't seem to be the case.
VBAK is now about one third of the size of the original table (number of records). But I see no logic behind the reduction. I can clearly see plenty of sales documents that have a time stamp way back from what I specified in my copy procedure and I can see others that have plant entries that should have been excluded from the copy as they do belong to different company codes than the ones I specified.
I was under the impression that TDMS would sort out the correct sales orders for me but somehow that doesn't seem to be happening. I have to investigate further as to what exactly it did bring across but just by looking at what's in the target system I can see plenty of "wrong" entries in there either with a date outside the scope or with a plant outside the scope.
I can also see that at least the first 10'000 entries in VBAK in the target system have a valid from and to date of 00.00.0000 which could explain why the time based reduction didn't work?
Did you have similar experiences with your copies? Do I have to do a more detailed reduction such as specifying tables/fields and values?
Thanks for any suggestions
Stefan
Edited by: Stefan Sinzig on Oct 3, 2011 4:57 AM

The reduction itself is not based on the date when the order was created but the logic enhances it to invoices and offers, basically the complete update process.
If you see data that definitely shouldn't be there I'd open an OSS call and let the support check what's wrong.
Markus

TDMS copy based on Company Code and time based reduction.

I'm struggling to understand the process of this scenario.
I created a new client in the target system (using local client copy with SAP_UCSV).
I configured a time based and company code based reduction.
After the TDMS copy is complete, I check the target system and still find plenty of data that isn't related to the company codes I selected. It appears that it still copies part of the excluded data. For example: I can still find work orders and sales orders for company codes that I specifically didn't select for the copy process.
Any idea why this is? It appears that the copy doesn't bring across ALL of the excluded data. Just some.
I double checked and triple checked my TDMS selection for company code based reduction and I can't find any error in there.
To be more specific: I selected company code A01 A02 A03 and left B01 B02 B03 out. After the copy there are still orders visible in the target system with company code B01 B02 B03.
This is after I created an empty target client first so it's not copying into an already existing client.
Thanks for any guidance guys.

Hm, not sure what's going on. There is no clear link between those existing orders and the company codes I initially selected. Then again it only seems to have a "high level" record of the data. As soon as one starts to drill down, the data is missing as expected. Same goes for other areas as well.
Looks like we can live with that for now so I won't lose any sleep over it anymore.

TDMS - time based reduction - receiver system deletion

Experts,
I'm doing a time based reduction. I'm on the step "Start Deletion of Data in Receiver System". It's been running for over 18hours.
But I don't see any jobs running in SM66 on the Central/Control or Sender or Reciever systems.
When I click on the "Task" button, I see it has completed 8,444 of 12,246 sub activites. There are 3,802 not yet started.
We're on all the latest levels of DMIS and ECC.
Any ideas?
Thanks
NICK

Ashley and Niraj,
Hey, I'm all for tips/tricks so don't worry about messing up my thread.
I completely shut down the central/control system via stopsap and restarted. Still it was in "running" status but no jobs were running on sender/rec or central/control.
So I tried the trouble-shooting but it was un-clear to me what to do.
I ended up highlighting the phase I reference earlier, then doing "execute" again. The status changes from the "truck" to a green flag and I started to see jobs run again on the receiver system. Again they have stopped, but I see another job scheduled to run in a few minutes....It's just weird, I didn't run into this on my last time-based copy.
I'll post a few things I've learned to increase performance:
RDISP/MAX_WP_RUNTIME = 0
At LEAST 25 WP and 25 BCK procs
rec/client = OFF
RDISP/BTCTIME = 60
RUN STATS regularly
TAKE OUT OF ARCHIVELOG MODE
Read/Impl these notes:
Read theseu2026Update these parameters
o TD05X_FILL_VBUK_1 Note 1058864
o TD05X_FILL_VBUK_2 Note 1054584
o TD05X_FILL_BKPF Note 1044518
o TD05X_FILL_EBAN Note 1054583
o TD05X_FILL_EQUI Note 1037712
Set these oracle index on rec system:
Table: QMIH
fields: MANDT, BEQUI
Table: PRPR
fields: MANDT, EQUNR
Table: VBFA
fields: MANDT, VBELN, VBELV, POSNV
set parameter u2018P_CLUu2019 to u2018Yu2019 in the following
activities before you start the activities for filling internal header tables:
TD05X_FILL_BKPF
TD05X_FILL_CE
TD05X_FILL_EKKO
TD05X_FILL_VBUK
TD05X_FILL_VBUK_1
TD05X_FILL_VBUK_2
TD05X_FILL_VSRESB
TD05X_FILL_WBRK_1
run TCODE CNVMBTACTPAR, specify the project number to do this
IMPORTANT TCODEs
CNV_MBT_TDMS_MY  Main TDMS starting point
CNVMBTMON  Process Monitor (must know your project number)
DTLMON  MWB transfer monitor
CNVMBTACTPAR  activity parameters
CNVMBTACTDEF  MBT PCL activity maint
CNVMBTTWB  TDMS workbench to develop scrambling rules
CNV_TDMS_HCM_SCRAM  run in SENDER system for scrambling functionality
Reports
CNV_MBT_PACKAGE_REORG  to reorganize TDMS projects..aka delete
CNV_MBT_DTL_FUGR_DELETE  deletes function groups associated with old projects
Tables
CNVMBTUSEDMTIDS  lists obsolete MTIDs
IMPORTANT NOTES
Note 894307 - TDMS: Tips, tricks, general problems, error tracing
Note 1405597 - All relevant notes for TDMS Service Pack 12 and above
Note 1402704 - TDMS Composite Note : Support Package Independent
Note 890797 - SAP TDMS - required and recommended system settings
Note 894904 - TDMS: Problems during deletion of data in receiver system
Note 916763 - TDMS performance "composite SAP note"
Note 1003051 - TDMS 3.0 corrections - Composite SAP Note
Note 1159279 - Objects that are transferred with TDMS
Note 939823 - TDMS: General questionnaire for problem specification
Note 897100 - TDMS: Generating profiles for TDMS user roles
Note 1068059 - To obtain the optimal deletion method for tables (receiver)
Note 970531 - Installation and delta upgrade of DMIS 2006_1
Note 970532 - Installation of DMIS Content 2006_1
Note 1231203 - TDMS release strategy (Add-on: DMIS, DMIS_CNT, DMIS_EXT...)
Note 1244346 - Support Packages for TDMS (add-on DMIS, DMIS_CNT, ...)
I'm doing this for an ECC system running ecc 6.0 EHP6 by the way.
Still any help with my issue on the delete would be helpful. but post tips I don't kwnow about
NICK

TDMS time based reduction method has no end date

Hello TDMS experts,
I am in the process of configuring the 'Time based reduction' method of TDMS. In the package, I am in phase "System Analysis"->"Analyze and specify'from date'".
Here it gives me the option to specify the start/from date only. If I want to transfer data for only a month in the past lets say april of 2007, then how can I specify the from and to dates.
Please advise.
Thank you,
kind regards,
Zaheer Shaikh

Hi Pankaj,
Thanks for the reply.
In the phase "maintain Table Reduction" I have chosen SAP standard reduction, that means the table reduction is handled by SAP itself. Since my sender system database is 4 Terabytes, my question is if I select the 'from date' as 10th April 2009 (present date is 20 April 2009), will the TDMS still copy the whole tables for which I have not manually defined any reduction?
Please advice.
Thank you,
Kind regards,
Zaheer Shaikh

Please explain steps for Time based reduction scenario

Hi,
I am done with the RFC connections.
The scenario I am going to work with is 'Time Based Reduction'.
Can somebody please explain the process step-by-step from here on.
Thanks,
Mohammed Tauseef Ahmed

hi,
thanks for the replies.
the step "Start Programs for Generation and Receiver Settingsu201D is taking very very long time for execution(the log shows that the process started on May20,and it is still going on).
Now till the execution of this step is completed,we cannot execute furthet steps.Is there a way that we can execute the other steps or do we have to wait for this step to be completed?
Secondly, on the suggestion to change the process settings, I was not able to make the changes in process settings. Can the somebody kindly explain step-by-step on how to change the process settings.
Thanks.
Mohammed Tauseef Ahmed

Calculation of SLA times based on Service Organization

Is it possible to calculate the SLA times based only on Service org?
a) Using Service contracts i.e create SC with only org and assign the Service & Response profiles.
Else as mentioned below.
Please give your more thoughts.
I maintain the Service & response profiles at "Maintain Availability and Response Times" .
Can I access these values directly in the BADI ?
My scenario is
a) An agent belongs to a service org.
b) I define these Profiles seperately for each Org (Org1 Org2 etc) at the above tcode.This manual entry.I know we dont have org to profiles mapping in the above tcode.I just painly maintain.
c) In the BADI i check the org entered in the complaint.
d) for Ex if the Org1 is entered I want to access the profiles for Org1.If else ladder.
e) then use these profiles to calculate the SLA times.
f) then save the document.
g) Also trigger an e-mail saying the above time lines.
Is the above flow possible??
Let me know if you want me to post this onto another thread.
Thanks
amol

Shalini,
I will be just maintaining the service and response profiles in the "Maintain Availa..." tcode.
There wont be exact mapping stored in any table.
My logic would be ,i dunno whether this right or wrong..
1) Once i get the Org ,I would compare like ths
if( orgdata = org1)
then service profile 1 etc.
2) then apply the profiles to the cal of SLA times.
I think we can achieve what you said using CRM_ORDERADM_I_BADI
Or we need to use the BADI's specifically mentioned for serv contract det and calculation of SLA.
As you know in SAP for SLA times we need to have the service contract for a) customer b) org and many other parameters.then to this SC we need to associate the service and response profiles.When the SC is determined in a complaint ,the serv and resp profiles will be used to get the SLA times.
But my requirement is to have determine the SLA times based on the service organisations.Not based on the customer and any other parameters.
For ex : If my serv org is in India the times would be diff ..if my serv org is in US the times would be diff.
So let me know what approach would be best ?
Use BADI's as above or does this approach of having define different Service contracts (without having Partner functions customer etc) for diff orgs?
Thanks
Amol

In general what is the time period of the XI projects ?

Hi All
    Can any one help me what is the time period of the XI Projects (In general)?
    In realtime how the time is managed/Utilized on resources ?
    How the work estimations will be done ? Based on What ?
Adv...thanks and points
regards
--- Rakesh

Hi
      This is based on the projects but in general (In addition to above)
      As follows
     In general there are 3 kinds of interfaces
1)     Easy --- 2 days (Which will include dev+ document)
     2) Medium -
5 days
3)     Complex -
10 to 12 days (complex BPMs + Mappings+ document)
      Project full time will purely depends on the Business (Requirement)
     + No.systems+ No.scenarios
      But in general 4months to 6 months for normal projects
>> About work already answer given
I hope this will solve your question
regards
-- prasad

Installing Java based Scenarios will effect old 3.0B reports in NW2004s ?

Hi,
Can anybody tell me whether Installing Java based Scenarios will effect old reports running in 3.0B.? or we will be just able to use the new features available after installing Java based scenarios and old queries/ web reports will remain same?
Here I should mention that we are upgrading our BW environment from 3.0B to NW2004s.
Please help me.
regards,
Jeet

Hi Prakash,
Thank you very much for your fast reply.I read the blog and it is a lot of very useful information. I have a couple of questions though:
1. <u>Option 3 - Publishing Strategy within SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI</u> - is definately what we need:
"End User Accesses
&#56256;&#56452; Users will be assigned to Groups which have Roles in them
&#56256;&#56452; Therefore, all users will see a tab in the portal navigation for their reports
&#56256;&#56452; KM Navigation iView will be used to link KM Folder with Portal Role per Application Area
&#56256;&#56452; Users will only have 1 access point: Portal Roles"
So If I understood you correctly 1)I need to create Roles in Portal.
2)Assign users to the Roles.
3)Users will have only those roles assigned to them(for ex: sales manager role, AE role and so on)
4)Publish my web quires to PCD and then role.
So this part is clear.
What I still don't understand is how to make the tree menu display in the Role that I will create? And with in the Role to have different folders (in a tree display view) that would have names (links) to differnet web reports (iviews that i will store and publish)? Is there an example with step by step for this?
Is there an example of how to implement the Option 3?
2. <b>Bookmarks</b> - as I understood by "I recommend using the shared BEx Portfolio KM Bookmarks instead of traditional bookmarks" you reffering to 'Save As' button on the run time of the report that lets you save to favorites, Myportfolio... I have no problem of using it but is there a way:
1) bypass the selection screen when executing the saved KMbookmark? I tried saving it under the my favorites and when executing it brings me to the selection screen first (I could use variants for selection screen, so what is the use??!!)
2)how can i send this saved bookmark by e-mail to a collegue? Is there a way? If not may be there are a new concept that we don't understand?
Thank you very much again.

Time based mode runs 4 hours before time set

time based modes are running 4 hours early...
The mode was set for 6:00 pm, ran at 2:00 pm.
changed it to 8:00 pm it then ran at 4:00 pm
when creating the mode it said that EST after the begin time, so it knows the correct time zone that I am in
Bill T

Paul,
Can you elaborate on where you applied the configuration. I have a scenario where Rightfax sends the call to CUCM via an H323 trunk, then CUCM sends the call to the PSTN Gateway and then out to the PSTN. I am experiencing the same issue where the call disconnects before the destination fax answers if it is set to ring 3 or 4 times before answering.
I'm not sure that I understand what you mean by splitting the incoming and outgoing dialpeer. I have the following dialpeer to match and route my outbound number to the PSTN.
dial-peer voice 92 pots
translation-profile incoming PREFIX-9
translation-profile outgoing CALLERID
destination-pattern 91[2-9]..[2-9]......
progress_ind setup enable 3
progress_ind progress enable 8
port 0/0/0:23
forward-digits 11
I appreciate any help you can provide.

Time Based Workflow - how to make it work?

Hello,
Has anyone successfully built a Time Based Workflow? Could you share your examples?
For me it does not work properly.
I have tried to set up 2 workflows: on Opportunity Close Date and Account Contract Expiration Date.
- Account Contract Expiration Date: I want an Account Owner to get an email notification exactly 6 months before the contract with his client expires. However - the email is triggered each time the record is modified - so I have seen in the workflow monitor that users on the date of contract expiration - 180 days will receive as many emails as many times they modified the record! Is there a way to avoid this situation?
- Opportunity Close Date - I want to send an email to Opportunity Owner's Manager - 10 days after the opportunity was closed. However - there will be the same issue as above + the wait action is not working with a PRE function.
Please let me know what you think and if you have already built a Time Based Workflow that works correctly.
Edited by: MagdaR on May 18, 2010 1:57 AM

Let's start with the workflow for Opty Close Date.
There are a lot of ways to do this, so you'll need to evaluate which way is best for your case, but the basics are to check to ensure that the opty is closed for the first time, then set the flag. In order to accomodate for the opty being closed when it is created, you will have to consider a post default for the flag in addition to the workflow.
In this case, you could create a workflow on Opty using the before modified record saved trigger event. In the Rule Condition, have the workflow check for a closed opty and if the status changed to closed during this modification. There are a number of options to validate this, including sales stage = Closed/Won or Lost, Closed Date is populated for the first time, Status is closed. In any case, just validate that the opty was closed for the first time using the PRE Function (i.e., PRE(Closed Date) is null and PRE(Closed Date)<>Closed Date). When your condition is met, set a flag that will trigger the event. You could also add a date that the wf conditions were met the first time, to ensure that you track when the rule was originally triggered.
The next step is to have a workflow that unsets the flag if the conditions are not met. Set the order on this one to follow the rule above.
The last rule is the wait/email rule and it uses the when modified record saved event. This rule triggers on the flag being checked, then waits to send the email.
Test this and validate that it will work for your purposes. Based on this workflow, you should be able to create the other one, and I can help if you have any issues.
Good Luck,
Thom

What is one time vendor??

Hi,
i have one query like this.
Vendor name is taken from lfa1-name1.so,If vendor is OTA(one time vendor) then override that lfa1-name1 with BSEC-NAME1.
However vendor is one time vendor based on account group LFA1-KTOKK = 'OTBD' .
What is one time vendor means that?
any one can help me.
thanq.

Hi,
CPD :
Conto pro Diverse
Turnovers that could not be assigned to an account are posted to this account by customers and vendors.
Cause:
it's to costly to create a master data for "one time" customers/vendors
A.
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

Exclude a table from time-based reduction

Hi,
Iu2019d like to exclude a table from time-based reduction. How can I do this ? Is there any manual how to do customizing in TDMS ?
Regards
p121848

Thank you Markus for your annotation.
AUFK is technically declared as an Master Data Table, but stores orders. Standard
TDMS provides a reduction of this file and in the client copies we did via TDMS a lot of records disappeared when we selected time-reduction.
Now we fond out that some Transactions as OKB9 or KA03 refer to old internal orders. So we would like to maintain the customizing, to exclude AUFK from reduction. But this is not possible in activity TD02P_TABLEINFO, because no changes can be done to the tables, which have got the transfer_status 1 = Reduce.
You can manipulate the Transfer-Status in file CNVTDMS_02_STEMP before getting to activity TD02P_TABLEINFO, but I wonder whether this is the way one should do.
Any idea ?
Regards p121848

Time Based publishing on taxonomy

Hi there,
we have built a news application where everyone can post it's own news items. Location of the user is a personal folder created by using a userhome filter. The folder has time based publishing activated, the lifetime can be entered in the edit form or directly on the news item through 'details'.
To display all items for all users, a taxonomy is used. However, the lifetime is ignored and all items are visible to all users.
I have activated the tbp service on the /taxonomies repository, as well as enabled 'lifetime' on my 'news' subfolder (everyone has read permissions on this one). Unfortunately, still all items are visible to all users.
Is TBP possible on a taxonomy?
Thanks,
Kevin

Hi Kevin,
we have kind of the same scenario here.
We have a KM Folder where editors are editing news. This folder has a taxonomy to display different views on this news folder. TBP is activated in the folder.
It works like that:
Endusers only see valid news in the taxonomy folders. BUT editors are seeing even the expired ones, nevertheless that they only have Read permissions in the Taxonomy and /taxdata repository. So it seems to us that the "Full control" permission from the Source KM Folder is kind of overwriting the Read only permission in the Taxonomy. (Maybe you have the same problem)
Our solution might be that we are programming a "KM Resource List Filter" to filter out the unwanted expired news out of the taxonomy folder for the editors as well.
Cheers
Christoph

Time Based Publishing - Not Working

Hello SAP KM Gurus-
I had configured Time Based Publishing to work on our clustered portal. Everything worked fine until we went to a central instance / dialog set-up. Now Time Based Publishing no longer works and I can't seem to get it to work no matter what I do. I have so far: scheduled the job on only one instance (as per the clustering guidelines in SAP Library), turned it on with properties with the repository (and for the folder I wish to use) and have checked to make sure the service is okay in KM Configuration. However, it seems like the job never comes by to hide the documents b/c they just show up for Read users no matter what I change. As I stated before, this was working fine until we went to the new configuation.
I've checked SAP Notes with no luck. Anyone have any idea why this is not working? I'm fresh out.
Any help greatly appreciated...
Jim

Hello Anjali-
Thanks for your post. Yes, I have checked that. Here are my settings - I have Check Valid From assigned to one instance running on the Central Instance and Check Valid To assigned to the other instance (we have two instances on each server) as per the help docs. In component monitor, tbp is coming up green and the properties it is State-Ok. On the repositories, I have both tbp and properties assigned and when I enable tbp I can get the lifecycle tab for the documents. It appears as if everything is set up right. However, the read users can see the documents just fine when they shouldn't. It seems as if the Check Valid From and Check Valid To jobs just never run.
Is there anyway I can see if the jobs have run and what the schedule was? The tbp report also showing nothing... Does it look like I'm doing anything wrong above. I'm on EP 14/KM 14 by the way...
Thanks for your help-
Jim

What is a time based scenario in TDMS?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for