What is better for AEFX CS3 to run unbelievably?

I'm looking at buying a new PC to run After Effects CS3 better and I was wondering what is the best route to go. Should I get a machine with more processors or should I get more Ram. Would a graphics card make a huge difference and which is a better one to use? Keeping in mind that I'm going to be running Avid Liquid on the same machine and it works best on gaming cards. I have tried a fancy workstation graphics card before but Avid didn't run nicely with the motherboard that it needed.

WAZ SA wrote:
Keeping in mind that I'm going to be running Avid Liquid.
Well, does it run on Vista 64bit? If not, then it's gonna suck and you will be stuck with XP or Vista 32bit, making any considerations regarding a "perfect" system kinda pointless. In that case you could simply buy any recent dual core/quad core/ AMD Phenom system, but never even max them out due to being stuck with 4GB RAM at most, of which AE then could use 3GB. Certainly still kinda usable for lighter stuff, but you can forget about multiprocessing and every time you realyl push the limits, you will find yourself hating your life when once more you run ouzt of memory to render some elaborate effect. Assuming you can go 64bit - Core7i + Vista 64bit + full RAM outfit (12GB/24GB). Best bang for the buck in a single processor workstation. For other processors, simply follow the guidelines laid out in the Memory and Multiprocessing help files, assuming you even want to use this feature. Similar considerations would apply, if you ever paln on using Dynamic Link. If your sole concern is interactive feedback while working, dual cores may be preferable to quad cores, as their per-core efficiency is better. Quads only really show their muscles for intense work and lots of final rendering. As one last thing: If you get a new machine and want to use MP rendring, consider upgrading to CS4. Thoise features have been considerably refined there.
Mylenium

Similar Messages

I don't know what i need. I'am a mac user but i need to run quick books premier. This is the only software i need in windows 7. Could i have some advise in what is better for me, Bootcamp or parallels

I don't know what i need. I'am a mac user but i need to run quick books premier. This is the only software i need in windows . Could i have some advise in what is better for me, Bootcamp or Parallels

The Intuit rep said they don't "support" QuickbooksPremier on a "virtual machine." Do you know what I risk by using it, anyway? thanks for the advice about Boot Camp vs Parallels, BTW!
I use QuickBooks Pro for Mac, so I haven't had need to try any of the Windows versions in a VM. But I can't think why it wouldn't work. From within the VM, QuickBooks Premier would believe it is operating on PC hardware within Windows.
I would guess they mean that the multiple user support wouldn't work from within the VM. But I would think that would also work. Windows can see the Internet from within the VM, which means it can see your network. So if Windows can see the network, then QB Premier should be able to, too.
I know you can get Parallels as a demo, and maybe you could get QB Premier as trial software. So if you already have a retail copy of Windows to load into a VM, it would only cost you time to test what's possible.

Hi. im ipad and ipohe user. now i want to buy my first macbook. i need to know what is better for me: macbook pro 13´´ or macbook air 13´´?? or another??

hi. im ipad and ipohe user. now i want to buy my first macbook. i need to know what is better for me: macbook pro 13´´ or macbook air 13´´?? or another??
i will not move it frecuently from home because i always have with me the iphone and sometimes the ipad.
im looking apple store online because im trying to buy it refubrished (im from argentina and travel to NYC next month)...
please i hear you...!

Light weight basic needs, power miser - MacBook Air (glossy screens)
Semi-light weight basic needs, more storage, DVD drive, hot machine (no 3D gaming) - 13" MacBook Pro (glossy screens)
Bit heavier, pro needs, 3D gaming, cool machine, power hungry, - 15" MacBook Pro (anti-glare screen option, recommended)
Same as above, larger screen for HD video, cool machine, power hungry, 17" MacBook Pro (anti-glare screen option, recommended)

What is better for flowmeter totalization

What is better for flowmeter totalization, a pulsetrain or current loop? I have the option of using a pulsetrain or a 4-20mA loop. Would I have to integrate if the current loop is chosen?

If you use flowmeters with switch-type sensing (flips over when a given fluid chamber is full), your input signal is digital: a pulse.
It is most obvious to use a counter (available on many DAQ-cards) to totalise the amount of pulses.
Integration of analog signals (like 4-20mA) may give trouble due to drift (non-zero inputs).
Patrick de Boevere

What is better for iphone 3gs ios 5 or ios4

i am just wondering what is better for this model

Ios 5 has more features and is the latest software.

What is better for a MBP, shut down or sleep?? when you go to bed.

hi everyone, my question is, what is better for a MBP, to shut it down o sleep, i undestand to pun it into sleep when you go out for a time, or you need to move, but what shoul i do when i go to bed and the mac won´t be use for about 8 hours.
thanks regards

If you don't have any documents or programs open that need to stay open for the night then give your Mac a rest and Shut it down.
If you're updating or have stuff loaded that you want to start back on right in the morning, you could just put it to sleep so you're all set for the morning(make sure you plug it in though). It's personal preference really.

What´s better for work CS6 video production, Nvidia 680GTX Classified or Nvidia Quadro K5000?

What´s better for work CS6 video production, Nvidia 680GTX Classified $550 or Nvidia Quadro K5000 $1900? both whit 1536Cudacores and 4GBs VRam
I kow the diferences between cooling and power consuming but, there are other diference? What´s better for hardwork renders? with a K5000 i dont worry about cooling, but with that money i can buy 2 680GTX Classified of 4GBs each, and i want to know if Tesla work with the 680GTX.
I have a Windows 8 PC with i73770k,
Asus Z77
16GBs Ram
2T HD
and ´ll buy my SSD SATAIII, update to 32GBs Ram at 2200 and a videocard for work dynamicLink and rendering at the same time that i continue editing.
The software that i use is Cinema4D R13, 3DsMax 2013 Vray iRay and Realflow 5 and Adobe CS6 Video Production, i hope you guys can help me to decide what´s better for my work, i use all of this for Motion Design, video editing, 3D animation and Audio Production. Thank´s for reading...

Nvidia Maximus? its supost to be a Quadro+ Testla cards? or am missing something?
This is what i get in dicember of 2012 but i still need the GPU but now i edit RAW.
http://instagram.com/p/VdRsT1tenv/
http://instagram.com/p/VcNryLNend/
http://instagram.com/p/bApXlBteoI/
http://instagram.com/p/bFWlqCNegp/
http://instagram.com/p/a9TXQyNes_/
http://instagram.com/p/abXh_JNegn/
http://instagram.com/p/YMKAJ4tevK/
http://instagram.com/p/V4OBjQteuu/

What is better for RIA - FLEX or Silverlight?

What is better for RIA - FLEX or Silverlight? Any experience
here...
" Microsoft Silverlight 1.0 beta availability. Optimized for
the Web, Microsoft Silverlight enables developers and designers to
easily use existing skills and Visual Studio and Expression Studio
tools to deliver media experiences and rich interactive
applications. Silverlight works with any back-end Web platform or
technology, seamlessly integrating with existing infrastructure and
applications, including Apache and PHP, as well as JavaScript and
XHTML on the client. Beta 1.0 includes a go-live license, which
means customers can deploy their Silverlight applications in
production. Final availability of Microsoft Silverlight 1.0 is
scheduled for summer 2007."
Best Regards
Attila

I imagine that the Microsoft folks are really proud of
Silverlight -- I mean, they have been fighting the shift that the
Internet has caused from the beginning--pure client/server dies
hard. From the MS-only folks, Silverlight is a breath of fresh AIR.
I am glad that Microsoft has finally seen the RIA wisdom and joined
in with the rest of the world. I mean, how long was Java on the
scene before C# magically appeared; I am glad that they finally saw
the writing on the wall.
Personally, I don't care if you use Flex or Silverlight; just
that you use whatever for the right reasons. Flex has ample
documentation for me and the example apps far outshine anything
that I have seen in Silverlight. I found Flex to be pretty simple
to learn too. As Silverlight was only announced in April 2007, I
seriously doubt that "shakro" has actually gotten around to doing
any real work -- Flex at least has been around since 2004. I know a
lot of people that are building production-grade Flex/AIR
applications. I don't know anyone that is seriously considering
using Silverlight.
But then, that is my circle --- take my experience with a
grain of salt. Just also make sure to take the Microsoft fanboys
with a grain of salt too.

What is better for a fast MBP sleep or shutdown

Hi
is it okay to shutdown the computer instead of sleep like 4 time in 24 hours?
I would like to know what's best for the MBP. because I shut it down like once every three days or so. But when I leave it sleeping a lot of times I come and find it dead and needs to be plugged. So I'm thinking of shutting it down more often to save the battery.
what do you think?
P.S. running Lion OS X 10.7.2

If the computer will not be used for more than 8 hours then it would be better to shut it down and save power. Otherwise, use sleep. However, if you will leave the computer near an AC outlet then connect the AC adaptor. Use the battery when you cannot connect to an AC outlet.
About Batteries in Modern Apple Laptops
Apple - Batteries - Notebooks
Extending the Life of Your Laptop Battery
Apple - Batteries
Determining Battery Cycle Count
Calibrating your computer's battery for best performance
MacBook and MacBook Pro- Mac reduces processor speed when battery is removed while operating from an A-C adaptor
Battery University

What is better for security? WPA2 or Access control

I have a Airport express and 2 computers; a Mac and a PC.
When it come to securing your wi-fi connection so you don't get unauthorized clients on your network.
What is better
A- Just using encryption like WPA2 or some other password based system or
B- Just entering the "Airport ID" (MAC) of the computers I want to authorize in my network on the Access control panel.
Seems to me like the later is easier on the clients since they don't need a password or anything, It's completely transparent for the client. And I believe encryption slows down the connection a bit and create overhead for the computer. But maybe I don't have the full picture of the situation.
Is there anybody who can illuminated this subject for me?
thanks
PowerBookG4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

WPA2 is virtually uncrackable only really vulnerable if you use a real word as a password.
When using access control, MAC addresses are sent unecrypted can be read and spoofed and therefore do not add any security.
Unfortunately "Closed" networks, MAC access control lists, and reduction in transmission power are all more "feel good" security rather than real security. All these various approaches are dated and mistakenly lead to overconfidence.
WPA is your friend if you value wireless security.

I'd like to buy iPhone 5 GSM 900 1800 32 GB.What is better for using in Uzbekistan for price 750$?

Id like to buy iPhone 5 GSM 900 1800 32 GB for price 750$. Which is better for using in Uzbekistan?

Just be aware if you come to the US and purchase the iPhone you will have to return to the US for warranty service.
You only listed one phone so what is the other option?

What is better in a processor to run logic: more cores, or faster core speed?

I'm looking into buying a new desktop Mac computer. I use logic/finale for work everyday. What would be better to run logic. A processor with more cores or one with a higher speed? I don't know if logic is multithreaded or not so i'm not sure which will be a better solution. Anyone have any useful advice?

WAZ SA wrote:
Keeping in mind that I'm going to be running Avid Liquid.
Well, does it run on Vista 64bit? If not, then it's gonna suck and you will be stuck with XP or Vista 32bit, making any considerations regarding a "perfect" system kinda pointless. In that case you could simply buy any recent dual core/quad core/ AMD Phenom system, but never even max them out due to being stuck with 4GB RAM at most, of which AE then could use 3GB. Certainly still kinda usable for lighter stuff, but you can forget about multiprocessing and every time you realyl push the limits, you will find yourself hating your life when once more you run ouzt of memory to render some elaborate effect. Assuming you can go 64bit - Core7i + Vista 64bit + full RAM outfit (12GB/24GB). Best bang for the buck in a single processor workstation. For other processors, simply follow the guidelines laid out in the Memory and Multiprocessing help files, assuming you even want to use this feature. Similar considerations would apply, if you ever paln on using Dynamic Link. If your sole concern is interactive feedback while working, dual cores may be preferable to quad cores, as their per-core efficiency is better. Quads only really show their muscles for intense work and lots of final rendering. As one last thing: If you get a new machine and want to use MP rendring, consider upgrading to CS4. Thoise features have been considerably refined there.
Mylenium

What is better for home movie editing, ipad or mac book?

i have a panasonic hdc-sd90 camcorder and my current laptop is woefully underpowered to run any of the hd editing software so i have been thinking of an upgrade and this seems to be a good reason to do so. I also am self employed and require software that i can do basic invoicing on a spreadsheet. I like the idea of portablilty so the ipad is appealing but i don't know if it is powerful enough to enable me to edit my home movies adequately, plus the exporting issues that seem to come with the ipad (although i have heard there are apps you can get that help with this and printing documents as well from the ipad would be an advantage) If the new ipad is not able to edit the home movies then what mac book would be best for my needs?
i am relatively new to apples products and growing gradually more frustrated with windows based pc's as time goes on, hence the temptation to switch to apple.

Light weight basic needs, power miser - MacBook Air (glossy screens)
Semi-light weight basic needs, more storage, DVD drive, hot machine (no 3D gaming) - 13" MacBook Pro (glossy screens)
Bit heavier, pro needs, 3D gaming, cool machine, power hungry, - 15" MacBook Pro (anti-glare screen option, recommended)
Same as above, larger screen for HD video, cool machine, power hungry, 17" MacBook Pro (anti-glare screen option, recommended)

What is better for college? An iPad air or an iPad mini with retina display?

I'm currently a junior in high school and I'll be graduating in the summer of 2015. My parents, well mostly dad, are planning on buying me the iPad air with 128 GB of memory. I got curious and went to look at the price and compare models and I saw that the iPad mini with retina display was the same as the iPad air, the only difference is the size. Since I saw that it was cheaper I was thinking on telling my parents to buy me that instead of the iPad air because it is more costy and my family isn't really the rich kind of people. I will be only using the iPad for school and nothing else since I have my iPod to play games on and stuff so it will only be used for purely educational purposes. Plus I've been hearing around that the iPad air is not that great and stuff because it has a bigger screen and such. Personally for me, I do not care about the screen size I just care about the price for my parents' sake because I don't like it when they have to spend a lot of money. So can you please help me decide on which to get and why it would be better than the other? Please and thank you.

iPad Air vs. Retina iPad Mini: Which tablet is right for you?
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-31747_7-57610252-243/ipad-air-vs-retina-ipad-mini-w hich-tablet-is-right-for-you/
Should I Get the MacBook Air or the iPad Air
http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/should-i-get-the-macbook-air-or-the-new-ipad-air -good-tech-questions-196728
Unless you are going to store many thousands of high resolution photos and LOTs of movies or videos, you don't need a 128GB storage. Save some $ and get a smaller capacity.
16GB vs 32GB vs 64GB: Which new iPad storage capacity should you get?
http://www.imore.com/2012/03/08/16gb-32gb-64gb-ipad-capacity/
How much content will fit on my iPod or iPhone?
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1867
How Much iPad Memory Do You Need?
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad-Tutorials/a/How-Much-iPad-Memory-Do-You-Need.htm
You might consider getting a refurbished iPad for less than the regular retail price.
Buy a Refurbished iPad? The What, When, Why and How
http://www.maciverse.com/refurbished-ipad.html
Has new screen, back and battery, and 1-year warranty.
Refurbished iPads from Apple
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/ipad
 Cheers, Tom

What is better for my macbook pro on os x lion, 32-bit or 64-bit?

i'm wanting to get windows 7 home premium for my macbook pro which is on os x lion version 10.7.4 and i'm wondering what version of windows is better to get, the 32 bit version or the 64 version?
thank you for your help

Boot Camp- Macs that work with 64-bit editions of Windows 7/Vista
32-bit will be faster and more compatible. 64-bit is more powerful if you use applications that perform best in 64-bit versions. 32-bit uses less memory than 64-bit.

What is better for AEFX CS3 to run unbelievably?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for