What is faster Me.Filter or Me.RecordSource

I created a form that Search As You Type. When you type in a combo box, Access displays matching records. I use the On Change event with a private Sub. To find the records you can use the Form Filter or Form RecordSource property with a Sql Where Clause.
Finding the records is compute intensive. In general, what is faster to use:
Me.Filter or Me.RecordSource?
Thanks

See
Good Design Generally - Filter or Change RecordSource?
In short: it doesn't matter much but one or the other may be preferable depending on the circumstances.
Regards, Hans Vogelaar (http://www.eileenslounge.com)

Similar Messages

Memory Question "4x1 Gig or 2x2 Gig?" what is faster?

Memory Question "*4x1 Gig or 2x2 Gig*?" what is faster?
I'm still don't know if witch to choose?
4 times 1 gigabyte Ram Memory is cheaper but if I choose for 2 times 2 GB Ram I can always beef it it later.
And is my memory faster if I'm using 4 slots with 1 gig over 2 slot with 2 gig?
I'm asking this question because I think using 4 times the memory bandwidth will be faster?
http://www.janmaartendewit.com

Hello Jan
Welcome to Apple Discussions
The iMac (Late 2009): Installing or replacing memory article and your User's Guide are pretty clear, they both say that +"You can use 2 GB or 4 GB RAM SO-DIMMs of 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM in each slot."+ and not 1GB modules. > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3918
To upgrade your ram you will want at least 2 more 2 or 4GB modules and add that to the current 2 x 2GB of ram. > http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/iMac/DDR321.527
Dennis

What is faster thunderbolt or usb 3.0 gigabit ethernet

What is faster a thunderbolt to gigabit ethernet adapter or a usb 3.0 gigabit ethernet adapter?
Thanks

Both Thunderbolt and USB 3.0 have bandwidths that exceed gigabit ethernet so based on theoretical numbers they should perform the same. However, different product manufacturers will write different drivers and use different hardware so unless you test specific products the question can't really be answered. Probably have to wait until magazines such as MacWorld or other Mac related websites test and compare devices.

What is faster, an iphone 6 or a samsung galaxy s6?

what is faster,an iphone 6 or a samsung galaxy s6

Hi there
I’d be happy to help with your device question! As far as performance goes, these two devices are considered to be quite evenly matched, however in benchmark tests, the Samsung Galaxy S6 appears to outperform the iPhone 6. In normal day-to-day usage, you’d be hard pressed to be able to tell the two apart when it comes down to performance! I’d recommend visiting one of our AT&T company stores where you can test them out for yourself!
I hope this helps!
Charise

What is faster: DataReader or DataSet or something else?

Hi,
I need to read 250,000 records and show this information.
I am using DataReader and it takes 8 seconds. I need to raise it to 0.8 seconds atleast.
What is faster: DataReader or DataSet or something else?
Thank's
Alexei

Is it an I/O issue? Have you tried looking at
some performance counters to see where the bottleneck might be?
Is it a query issue? How complex is the
query? Do you have proper indexes in place?
Adam Machanic
Pro SQL Server 2005, available now
http://www..apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=457
<[email protected]>
wrote in message news:[email protected]..Hi,
I
am using the sql server on local
machine.
Thank's
Alexei

What's faster???

hello
One way is to transit data from one table MSSQL to another one on ORACLE, like in LKM SQL to ORACLE.
Second way is to unload data to file with BCP at the first and then load it to data base ORACLE with SQL-loader.
What's faster???

If you are dealing with larger volumes of data, it is almost certainly going to be using the BCP/External-Table/SQLLOADER option. If you are dealing with small and frequent movements, the overheads of process invocation with the latter might be unwarranted.
It depends!
Craig

What is Free Characteristics,Filter Area and 1ROWCOUNT keyfigure?

What is Free Characteristics,Filter Area and 1ROWCOUNT keyfigure?

What is Free Characteristics,Filter Area and 1ROWCOUNT keyfigure?
Hi M.V,
Free chars are those chars that you can use to drill down your query as per your requirement at run time, i.e. once you have executed the query you can make your filter or drill down options more flexible by using the free chars.
Filter Area : Filter area is that area where you can specify the Variable's required for input, you can also restrict some charcteristic values directly as well.
For e.g -> for ur query requirement is to take date as input from user, so u will create a variable based on the calday info-object and place it in filter area.
Directly restricting characte.
Restricting country to 'India', now u will get the data onnly where the country is india.
Any restriction that u specify in filter area will globally effect your query. i.e. u will see only that data ouput which meets the specified restrictions
1ROWCOUNT : you get field 1rowcount when u create any DSO. By default system adds this field that contains value 1 for each row.
Thanks
dipika

What kind of FIR filter in Labview SignalExpress Tektronix Edition?

I am using FIR filter in Labview SignalExpress Tektronix Edition to process signal acquired from the TDS3032B.But i dont know what kind of this filter(Window,least-squares,or equiripple...).Does any one know about this?

Check out some of NIs links:
Virtual Instrumentation Empowers Digital Signal Processing Design
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4759
Designing Filters Using the NI LabVIEW Digital Filter Design Toolkit
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3237
lots of information about different FIR can be found by searching on google as well.
National Instruments

What is a security filter?

What is a security filter?

Hi,
security filter restrict you to doing operation on essbase application level
options are
none
read
write
calculate
database manager
Thanks
Dhanjit G.

Whats a faster internet connection joining one or create one.i have one ps3 i imac 2 ipads and one macbook pro?

whats a faster internet connection joining one or create one.i have one ps3 one imac 2 ipads and one macbook pro?

For the AirPort Extreme Base Station to provide Internet access to network clients, it would need to be configured for: 1) Connection Sharing = Share a public IP address, and 2) Wireless Mode = Create a wireless network.
Although the option: Wireless Mode = Join a wireless network, exists for the Extreme, it really serves no purpose and should not be used.

What is "Fast Retry" of CodeType in Return Code

What is "Fast Retry" of CodeType in Return Code.
Thanks.

Hi Torsten
It seems very useful. Some updates will fail, because it is running, and it needs to be closed before update.
Will it repeat until the exit code isn't "Fast Retry" or it has repeat time?
Thanks

Anybody knows what is "FAST VIEW" used for?

Dear all,
A question about data extract settings, 'build fast views'? Can anybody tell what are 'fast views' and what they are used for?
Thanks,
gypsy

Thanks Frank.
Some more follow up questions:
1.) I checked and it seems that the default configuration is that this optimization is disabled. We have lots of code in our application that aren't calling RowSet.reset upon acquiring the view link RowSet and are expecting it to be "fresh." So I think it is false by default. Is this correct?
2.) Our performance problem isn't really caused by the new instances of RowSet that are being created. As the documentation itself says, the overhead introduced by new instances of RowSet aren't that big. Our problem is caused by the Contention being introduced by the ViewDefImpl.isViewLinkAccessorRetained(). And since all of our ViewObject impl classes are extending from one common framework class(which just extends ViewObjectImpl), we can just override the isViewLinkAccessorRetained at that level to just return the default value(false). This should eliminate the calls that are causing contention problems. Would you agree that this is an acceptable course of action?
3.) Just out of curiosity, why is ADF implementing the Property checking this way anyway? Shouldn't the value of this property be loaded only during VO instance construction (or some other reasonably infrequent event) instead?

What is faster?

Hi Gurus,
can you please suggest me what is right way?
1. to join three tables in one SELECT
or
2. to have three SELECT's
In reality first query return ID for second query and this will return also another ID for "real" third query.

All good points - however just to nitpick your IN vs EXISTS example, the optimizer will generally transform both queries into a semijoin using an index, if that will result in a lower cost:
SQL> @ind dept
                                                                                  Distinct
Index                        Unique? Type                  Status          Rows       keys Column name
PK_DEPT                      Y       NORMAL                VALID              4          4 DEPTNO
SQL> @ind emp
                                                                                  Distinct
Index                        Unique? Type                  Status          Rows       keys Column name
PK_EMP                       Y       NORMAL                VALID             14         14 EMPNO
SQL> SELECT dname, deptno
2 FROM   dept d
3 WHERE d.deptno IN (SELECT e.deptno FROM emp e)
4
SQL> @xplan
Plan hash value: 1090737117
| Id | Operation                    | Name    | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |         |     3 |    48 |     6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | MERGE JOIN SEMI             |         |     3 |    48 |     6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPT    |     4 |    52 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    INDEX FULL SCAN           | PK_DEPT |     4 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 |   SORT UNIQUE                |         |    14 |    42 |     4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL         | EMP     |    14 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - access("D"."DEPTNO"="E"."DEPTNO")
       filter("D"."DEPTNO"="E"."DEPTNO")
SQL> SELECT dname, deptno
2 FROM   dept d
3 WHERE EXISTS
4         ( SELECT e.deptno FROM emp e
5           WHERE d.deptno = e.deptno)
6
SQL> @xplan
Plan hash value: 1090737117
| Id | Operation                    | Name    | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |         |     3 |    48 |     6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | MERGE JOIN SEMI             |         |     3 |    48 |     6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPT    |     4 |    52 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    INDEX FULL SCAN           | PK_DEPT |     4 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 |   SORT UNIQUE                |         |    14 |    42 |     4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL         | EMP     |    14 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - access("E"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO")
       filter("E"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO")
SQL> create index emp_deptno_ix on emp(deptno) compute statistics;
Index created.
SQL> SELECT dname, deptno
2 FROM   dept d
3 WHERE d.deptno IN (SELECT e.deptno FROM emp e)
4
SQL> @xplan
Plan hash value: 151962099
| Id | Operation          | Name          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |               |     3 |    48 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | NESTED LOOPS SEMI |               |     3 |    48 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| DEPT          |     4 |    52 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN | EMP_DEPTNO_IX |     9 |    27 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("D"."DEPTNO"="E"."DEPTNO")I just mentioned this because "EXISTS is faster than IN" is often repeated around the forums when it is not necessarily true. Of course, I totally agree with the general point, that an SQL query can be written in many different ways and some are far less efficient than others (and cannot be automatically transformed into efficient ones by the optimizer).

I need to work on my pix faster, what is faster to work off of - internal SSD or external thunderbolt drive?

I have an issue deciding what I need to do.
I have purchase a LACIE 30TB NAS with Thunderbolt 2.0 ... my internal SSD is 1TB in my new Mac Pro (2014)
I dont know how photoshop works... if I open the file to work on PS located in the LACIE drive would it be as faster as opening it and modify it on my internal SSD ?

To know you would need the benchmark the actual devices. http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/

What is faster JDBC or SQLJ ?

hi
i am writing a java stored procedure in db2.
i have to process nearly a million reocrds. For ech record i have to do atleast 15 inserts/updates to the database.
what would be better to use JDBC or SQLJ(static sql) in terns of speed

hi
i am writing a java stored procedure in db2.
i have to process nearly a million reocrds. For ech
record i have to do atleast 15 inserts/updates to the
database.
what would be better to use JDBC or SQLJ(static sql)
in terns of speedLike all good performance questions... it depends. If I were going to process 1 million records and do 15 million insert/updates with the results, I would look first at using the database vendors native utilities. It may be faster to read the million records with Java and write 15 million records into a flat file in the format expected by a native load utility. Then use the native load utility to do the insert/ updates. These load utilities can be 100's of times faster than anything that can be written in Java at this time.
If you are set on using Java, then... it depends. When using JDBC you should use Batch update functionality, this can speed up insert/update activity by 10x+, if you do it correctly (making sure that you select the appropriate batch size). Prepared Statements provide the least external overhead because the database engine only needs to parse the SQL statement a single time. However you are providing less information to the database optimizer and this could result in worse performance for update processing. Insert activity will not be negatively, and should be positively effected by using a prepared statement because there is no query logic. I haven't written a Java DB2 stored procedure, but I am assuming that you have normal JDBC functionalty available to you.
I'm not sure exactly what SQLJ does for you. It sounds like it is similar to a Prepared Statement (static vs. dynamic SQL). Perhaps others who have used SQLJ can add some of their knowledge.
Once again, I would highly recommend looking at alternative utility processing as your first choice, some form of hybrid Java Stored procedure with a load Utility as a second choice and Java stored procedure only, as your last choice. Remember that volumes tend to increase so if this is an on going process you want to allow for 2 or 3 million records for the future.
Joel

What is faster Me.Filter or Me.RecordSource

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for