What is less file size?

For animations is it better to make objects mc's or groups?
Which has less file size or are they the same?

it shouldn't make any significant difference.

Similar Messages

What is theoptimal file size for stills, and dpi?

what is theoptimal file size for stills, and dpi?

In video dpi is not relevent. What counts in video is pixels. In FCP most recommendations I have seen is to size your stills so they have no more than 3 times the pixels in your project aspect ratio. For example if your project is 1280x720 then stills should be no more than 3 times the 1280x720. This allows you to crop the stills and still have good resolution. If no cropping is anticipated then they could be the same size as your project.

What is the file size that ODI can handle

Hi all,
What is the file size that ODI can handle ?????????
can it handle 1GB files without any issues?????????
Thanks
Phani

Hi Phani,
It also depends on the type of file you are transfering. If have used the XML file around 1GB and the performance is very low. But we used the Database schema to load the XML data and the performance had increased very well.
I never tried the large flat files load around 1GB.
Thanks,
Yellanki

Whats the maximimum File size

Hi
Whats the Maximum file size transfer is supported by XI..
I have file size of 2GB that has to transfer..Do i have to write the Adapter Module or XI will process 2GB file
SV

Hi,
XI cannt process 2 GB file in single shot.
Using chunking concept it can be done.
This concept can be implemented in two ways. On the sender side the application should chunk the data and XI should pull and process the data.
Or
On the adapter level chunking logic
Check the below links for Adapter level chunking.
SAP Network Blog: SAP XI acting as a (huge) file mover
[/people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2007/02/21/sap-xi-acting-as-a-huge-file-mover]
SAP Network Blog: Night Mare-Processing huge files in SAP XI
[/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/11/29/night-mare-processing-huge-files-in-sap-xi]
Thanks
Gujjeti

What is the file size of an episode on itunes?

I've just moved to Australia from the UK and am having to get used to download limits for the internet! I usually download my favourite shows from itunes but now I have to restrict what I download, What's the file size for an average 43ish minute show? I'm sure it says somewhere but I'm having a blind day! Thanks for any help in advance

Now that you bring it up, the one I looked at earlier was not downloaded from the iTunes store. I looked again and looked specifically for store downloads. One show is 40 min, 3 sec and 440.4 MB. Another is 50 min, 36 sec and 560.5 MB. A third is 44 min, 29 sec and 502.8 MB. All of these are 128 kbps sized at 640X480.

What is the file size of the OS X Mavericks 10.9.4 update?

What is the file size of the OS X Mavericks 10.9.4 update? I have a limited 4G connection, so this information would be useful BEFORE downloading, as it could put me over my limit and incur additional cost.

The Delta version is 283 MB: OS X Mavericks 10.9.4 Update
The Combo is 958 MB: OS X Mavericks 10.9.4 Update (Combo)

What is the file size of photoshop cs6 set up

what is the file size of photoshop cs6 set up

Whatever you define it to be.
By the way, you probably mean the file dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high), not "file size".

What influences the file size of Lightroom catalogue?

Just a general question really...
I often read in various forums of LR users who have tens of thousands of images in their catalogue, and yet the catalogue file itself is relatively small (e.g. "I've got 100,000+ images in my catalogue, and it's 350MB). I personally have around 11,700 images in my catalogue at present, and the catalogue file is fast approaching the 8GB size (currently at around 7.69GB). To be clear, I'm talking specifically about the lrcat file here, not any associated previews. I have a resonable number of virtual copies (say around 100), and have added quite a bit of metadata (hundreds, if not thousands of keywords, GPS coordinates, captions, star ratings, flags and so on). I also carry out quite a few local adjustments to many - although by no means close to all - of my photos in the develop module and have some pretty large editing histories as a result. I also have a modest number of publishing services running, and multiple collections including a number of smart collections.
This is not a problem for me, and I have plenty of space for lrcat file to grow into so I'm certainly not losing sleep. I'm just intrigued as to why my catalogue file is (possibly) larger than it should be.
M

If you want to post (or send me) a link to the lrcat file, I'd take a look at it for you, and give you a break-down what's consuming all the bytes. But it might be fun to learn how to do that yourself (e.g. using SQL). I use SQLiteSpy, but other people have their favorites.. (or you can use a command-line client if you prefer..). One way: just run "drop table "{table-name}" on each table then look at filesize (do this to a copy, not the real thing).
Anyway, it's hard to imagine keywords and captions etc. taking much of the space, since even if you had 1000 10-character words of text metadata per photo average that still only adds up to 117MB, which isn't a substantial portion of that 8G you're seeing occupied.
Anyway, if you've painted the heck out of most of them and not cleared dev history, that'll do it - that's where I'd put my money too...
One thing to consider to keep file-size down:
===================================
* After reaching a milestone in your editing, take a snapshot then clear edit history, or the top part of it anyway (e.g. leave the import step), using a preset like:
Clear Edit History.lrtemplate
s = {
    id = "E36E8CB3-B52B-41AC-8FA9-1989FAFD5223",
    internalName = "No Edit",
    title = "Clear Edit History",
    type = "Develop",
    value = {
        settings = {
            NoEdit = true,
        uuid = "34402820-B470-4D5B-9369-0502F2176B7F",
    version = 0,
(that's my most frequently used preset, by far ;-})
PS - I've written a plugin called DevHistoryEditor, which can auto-consolidate steps and reduce catalog size - it's a bit cumbersome to use a.t.m. but in case you're interested...
Rob

What is the file size limitation in cFolders

Dear All,
Can anybody tell me the maximum file size that we can store in cFolders? I have a FAQ sheet with me, which is saying like in one folder it can accomodate 200MB. Any views on it ....
regards,
rajesh.

Check the document in the below link about Sizing in cFolders
http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700004605882003E.pdf
Path: SAP NetWeaver -> SAP NetWeaver in Detail -> Solution Life-Cycle Management -> Hardware Sizing ->Media Library ->
-> Literature -> Sizing cFolders
Regards
Sreenivas

Does anyone know what the max file size is?

I'm just curious, because I want a portable music player that can play audio files in excess of 150mb (wav files) and am wondering if the 5G ipods can handle such files without skipping.

There is no maximum file size.
The 5th Gen iPods can play full length movies, in excess of 500mb. It won't have any trouble playing a large WAV file.
Skipping won't be an issue... but you can be sure that your battery life will suffer a bit. If the file size is larger than the iPods buffer (which I believe is 64mb on the 5th Gen), then the hard disk will spin constantly throughout the playback of the track. This will put a strain on the battery.

What is the file size requirements for a graphical identity plate in 5.5?

Seems to have gotten smaller? My old plate is cut off

See my post in this thread: Lightroom 5.4 identity plate space

What is the maximum File Size we can send

Hi Experts,
I have done simple scenario file to file without IR.
I have one doubt here, what is maximum file size (Text and XML)we can transfer from source to target ftps.
text file = file size?
xml file = file size?
Thanks for inputs.
Bhaskar

There is no limit to the message size (file size) that can be transfered.....the only thing required is that your server should have the necessary configuration (hardware) to handle a file of a particlar size.
this question is actually asked a couple of times and in there people have even mentioned the transfer of files in 1GB ... so it all depends on your Hardware.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Problem with CS2 edit file size

When I create a new version of a 3-4mb original, make a few simple modifications in CS2 and save back to Aperture the resulting version is almost 70mb. If I export this version from Ap back to my desktop and check file size it is back to near the original size. Yet, when I check the file size stored in my Ap library, it is 70mb. This will fill my hard drive in a hurry! Can someone help explain this ??

I did a little more experimenting by making external edits in PS on a 3.9mb JPG file in both Aperture and Lightroom to see what the resulting file sizes were. In both cases I left the master outside the library so that I could see file additions in both the application library and in the folder containing the originals and revisions. I looked into the file directories to determine real file sizes rather than relying on info from the applications. The increase in library file size was small in both apps. However, there was a significant difference in the revised file size between Aperture & Lightroom in the folders containing the originals. The best I could do in Aperture produced a 24.6mb psd revised file, which showed as a version in the App., in addition to the master. Lightroom gives the option to revise the master or revise a copy of the master when exporting. When revising a copy of the master, the result was a new jpg file approximately the same size as the master - 3.9mb - which appeared as a version. This is what I would like to be able to do in Aperture.
I have been using PS for several years for all my photo enhancements and have developed a pretty comfortable and effective routine. Having used Aperture for a couple of months now, I can see that most minor edits can be done more easily in Aperture, but the same is true of Lightwell. Although I would probably only use PS on less than 25% of my keeper photos, this increased storage requirement seems more trouble than the advantages of Aperture vs Lightroom are worth. Maybe Apple will make a change in the next revision that will effect this situation and make Aperture more desirable for JPG shooters.
Thanks Again,
Bob

Max File size in UFS and ZFS

Hi,
Any one can share what is max file size can be created in Solaris 10 UFS and ZFS ?
What will be max size file compression using tar,gz ?
Regards
Siva

from 'man ufs':
A sparse file can have a logical size of one terabyte.
However, the actual amount of data that can be stored
in a file is approximately one percent less than one
terabyte because of file system overhead.
As for ZFS, well, its a 128bit filesystem, and the maximum size of a file or directory is 2 ^64^ bytes, which i think is somewhere around 8 exabyte (i.e 8192 petabyte), even though my calculator gave up on calculating it.
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/ds/zfs.jsp
.7/M.
Edited by: abrante on Feb 28, 2011 7:31 AM
fixed layout and 2 ^64^

Photoshop Meta Data File Sizes

I am using meta data "description" menu to add meta data to web images.
The basics:
title
description
keywords
copyright
Thats is about it for my application....so far and like I say it is just for web images at this point.
At any rate to me surprise I did not realize how much the meta data added to file size.
I had assummed it was minimal but in fact that is not the case. Meta data ends up adding a lot.
Question:
So is there a way in Photoshop to see what the final file size will be with the meta data included as I have found, so far, is the image itself file size when I view the
"Saving for Web & Devices" menu screen.
Also tried the "Info" menu and neither indicate the meta data additons ito an images file size.
One of the reasons is, of course, that I would like to get as many keywords in there as possible, as an example lets say this was the logo or site's header and they have a lot of different products.
The more keywords the better the SEO results will be. I am sure this statement in itself is disputable but as of now 5/2013 it appears that way as far as SE's are concerned.
Tested this extensively and the result were remakable, but that is another story.
Any help or links to other infomration will be
greatly appreciated
thank you
Jonny

Mylenium wrote:
The more keywords the better the SEO results will be.
I new that was a big mistake saying it that way.
I was focused on the file size issue.
Trying to use more efficient effective keywords for an image that represents several products.
As a simple example let's say the site focused on pencils, pens, and paper clips.
So just using one of those keywords or even just two of them would be misleading to the site visitor.
So in my opinion using all three would be most effective.
I don't intend to use red pens, black pens, purple pens, metal paper clips, plastic paper clips, colored paper clips, etc.
But that is not my point anyway. What a pain in the *** it will be to try this, save it, try that, save it, blah, blah, blah,etc.
Thank you very muich for taking the time to respond and KNOW that I greatly appreciate your advise.
You confimred my suspicions.
I did find a PS CS5 Plug-in that would supposedly make this task easier but i am very suspicous, won't waste my time.
Took a copy of the default "raw data" from the "File Info" menus and pasted that into BBEdit (XML or whatever) and the file size increased by about 3.5k with just the default "raw data", whoa.
So with experimetation, as you suggest I may get and idea of size more or less.
I was hoping I was making it harder than it was but Adobe has not responded either.

What is less file size?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for