What is Nokia's own statement of direction regardi...

I've been told Nokia is ditching the brand "OVI", in favor of a brand called "Nokia" or alike.
Does this mean that a new application will replace OVI Suite?
What is Nokia's own stand on OVI suite vs. PC Suite?

Well it is comforting to hear that similar things happened elsewhere. I just called the Nokia Call center and got my imei checked to see if my phone was smuggled or something. They said the same thing.
Well, I will just sit and wait I guess.
I still own a NOKIA 6250 KUDOS others as You Would Like to be KUDOSed! There are only 10 kinds of people in the world, ones who digg binary and ones who dont

Similar Messages

Comment regarding new statement of direction

Hi all,
I've just read the new statement of direction regarding Oracle Workflow (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/workflow/workflow_sod.html). Especially regarding the standalone version it is a great pitty that Oracle will kick such a good and stable product into the garbage can.
I'm not convinced that BPEL can replace Oracle Workflow. Also I'm missing a real migration path. It's not only Workflow that needs to be re-implemented. For example our custom application would have be to re-implemented as well because Workflow is one of the central components.
So if I read "In addition, Oracle are now recommending that customers who have Oracle Workflow workflows in development or production that they plan to continue to enhance in the future should begin re-implementing those in BPEL." or "While there will be some development costs associated with the migration of existing processes from Oracle Workflow to Oracle BPEL Process Manager..." this brings me to some critical thaughts about the future of our custom application.
What are your thaughts and comments?
Best regards
Matthias

They also removed the entry about charting (Charting - Provide for chart rendering without using Flash (to enable display on mobile devices).)... Guess this will be in the next release (4.2) or next MAJOR release (5.0??)..
Thank you,
Tony Miller
Webster, TX
On the road of life...There are 'windshields', and there are 'bugs'
(splat!)
"Squeegees Wanted"
If this question is answered, please mark the thread as closed and assign points where earned..

Oracle Workflow - Statement of Direction and BPEL

Hi,
I am starting to study Oracle BPEL and other people at my company are studying Oracle Workflow.
Recently I found the following article at the OTN, regarding the Statement of Direction of Oracle Workflow:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/workflow/workflow_sod.html
It finishes saying:
"As Oracle BPEL Process Manager provides out-of-the-box features for building human-based workflows, rules-based process automation, and integration style business processes, further development on OW4J will not continue and OW4J will not be released.
Any new or existing customers who wish to build business processes in the middle tier are recommended to use Oracle BPEL Process Manager."
So my question is: Does Oracle BPEL provides (or will provide) all the functionality implemented in Oracle Workflow ? If not what are the main differences ?
I will be waiting for your thoughts
Thanks,
Claudio.

Site mentioned above is an internal site. External site is http://otn.oracle.com/bpel
I think the above highlighted SOD is about Oracle initiative to re-write current pl/sql based Workflow engine in Java so that it can ported to middle-tier. Since the acuisition of Collaxa they seems to be dumped that idea and positioning Oracle BPEL as the middle-tier process orchestration (BPM) solution.
Having said that let me take a shot at comparing Oracle Workflow and BPEL products....
Oracle Workflow
* No way getting dropped as Oracle EBS has huge investments in it
* Oracle Fusion Applications has plans to use the Oracle Workflow BES functionality extensively
* Good for modeling business processes within a single DB/application instances. It's possible to integrate with external apps but not an elegant solution
* Web Services can be a functional activity with in the work flow but again not an elegant solution. Requires DB java, queues and a listener
* Doensn't provide sophisticated modeling artifacts like TaskManager, Faults, sensors etc out of the box. It's possible to build your own library.
* Better performanent if the entire process interaction is within a single instance like Oracle EBS account generators, approval flows etc.
* Based on proprietary technology
Oracle BPEL
* Based on standards like BPEL, WSDL and WSIF
* What ever you can do in workflow can be done in BPEL but not the otherway round
* Has adapters to interact with various transports like JDBC, AQ, JMS, JCA, HTTP. That means integration with existing workflows is very easy
* Interation with Oracle AQs seem to be trivial as there is a native JCA based adapter for it
* You may get performance hit because of the multiple connection points. You may be loosing performance but gaining in flexibility
Overall Oracle BPEL seems to be the way to go if your business process involves multiple applications.
HTH
Rajesh

N95 in-car use - what are Nokia playing at?!

I have for some time been using a Nokia 6680 in my car, using a ck-7w car kit and a cr-27 holder. This works great, I have handsfree calling, I can charge my phone whenever I get in the car by putting it in the cradle & I have tomtom 5 mobile which works great, even muting the radio to give directions etc because it all integrates nicely.
Now Nokia have brought out the N95 and I thought great, satnav and phone in one device. So I have upgraded.
Guess what? Nokia N-series devices are "consumer" devices which don't get a special in-car holder. You what?!
The N95 works fine with the ck-7w using bluetooth, but it doesn't have a pop-port so you can't use the ck7w cable. The only way to use it in the car is with a generic holder and a cigarette lighter charger. There is no custom holder for it. To be honest I would be happy even if all the holder did was charge the phone and hold it - I'm happy with bluetooth connection to the car kit.
This has to be the most brain dead thinking from Nokia I have ever seen. I have been using Nokia phones with car kits since the 2010, 2140, nk702 (6130), 6110, 6210, 6310 & 6680. Like I said, my 6680 has tomtom mobile 5 sat nav installed. But guess what, the N95, a phone with BUILT IN SAT NAV has no in-car charger cradle, so you can't use it neatly in a car?!?!

[quote]Can anyone who has this working explain the process to get a bluetooth connection from the N95 to the CK-7W? I just seem not to be able to pair the two.[/quote]
Hi, I've got this working. I have a holder for the 6680 in place using cable connection as well. Haven't tried to connect them both at the same time, but I guess that's not what you want.
To get this working. In my situation, the carkit when using my 6680 always works. I don't need to have the keys. For the bluetooth connection I do have to have the power on (turn the key until you can play your radio, onboard lights turn on, etc.). After you turn on the power, let your N95 search for a new bluetooth device. In my situation, it found the CK-7W in just a few seconds. Then pair with the device using the 0000 password.Message Edited by jarnodewit on 29-Apr-200702:30 PM
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Designer dead - statement of direction

Just stumbled across the document "Oracle Forms, Oracle Reports, Oracle Designer Statement of Direction."
Didn't particularly like what I read:
"....Oracle Designer will not include new features...."
The way I read it, Oracle will seize further development of the generators (web plsql/forms/reports etc.)
Designer will still be supported, but new features will not be introduced as from now.
I hope I have read this wrong?
Jens
PS: The document can be found here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/forms/pdf/10g/ToolsSOD.pdf
DS.

I actually posted this today september 7.th, not August 20.th as the topics date says. This Forum application reaylly suck big time...
Jens

What is the best solid state drive for 2009 fall MacBook

what is the best solid state drive to upgrade a 2009 fall Macbook. also is 128 Gb enough?

I think 128 GB's is too small (SSD's are still too expensive for me).....I do not know what the best SSD is.....here is what I am about to do for my MacBook 4,1 (early 2008).....
for a hard drive....
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Seagate/ST95005620AS/
and for additional RAM.....
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other World Computing/5300DDR2S6GP/
....to get ready for Lion (10.7)...not exactly what you asked

What is the different between statement and preparedstatement?

hi,
recently i have attended a telephonic interview. they asked me what is the different between statement and preparedstatement? and when u will use them? Hi! can any one say me the original difference??

sorry dear,
i am already shortlisted. and monday is my HR round.
. Every 1 is not like u.
So you have read the examples and explanations that you found when you googled, and you have read the javadoc and you still don't understand? And you are shortlisted? For what? I hope you won't do server programming.
I will give you a few hints.
Escaping of data
Storing of dates
Safer
Faster

What is a good solid state hard drive for a Macbook Pro (2007 model)?

What is a good solid state hard drive for a Macbook Pro (2007 model)? I imagine they're still expensive, but I'm curious which would be good picks if I were to go for it.

I am using the Corsair P256 (256 GB) SSD. It is actually a Samsung drive. It works well, but will only give you part of the speed advantage due to the fact that the MBP from 2007 only has a 1.5 GB/s interface, while newer MBPs have a 3.0 GB/s interface.
Impact on battery run time seems to only be an increase of 15-20%.
Boot time on my MBP is 40 seconds to login prompt. System seems very responsive.

What is %IOWAIT of CPU states in TOP command output

What is "% iowait" in CPU States in Solaris? See below output it shows 11.2 % of CPU was used for IO.
Is CPU used in IO as well? If yes how?
last pid: 15598; load averages: 3.66, 3.39, 3.07 18:33:27
292 processes: 283 sleeping, 1 running, 5 zombie, 3 on cpu
CPU states: 17.9% idle, 54.8% user, 16.1% kernel, 11.2% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 16G real, 8029M free, 5425M swap in use, 19G swap free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND

The value of %iowait is relatively semi-meaningless these days and as a result we removed it from Solaris 10 onwards. The parameter is still displayed in certain commands but it will always be zero.
System Administration Commands                         iostat(1M)
     wt        the I/O wait time is no longer calculated as a
               percentage of CPU time, and this statistic will
               always return zero.Which means top will also show zero, eg:
load averages: 0.08, 0.17, 0.16;               up 0+02:04:38
88 processes: 87 sleeping, 1 on cpu
CPU states: 96.1% idle, 2.4% user, 1.5% kernel, *0.0% iowait*, 0.0% swap
Kernel: 1181 ctxsw, 21 trap, 1056 intr, 2553 syscall, 13 flt
Memory: 3327M phys mem, 932M free mem, 1663M total swap, 1663M free swap

Oracle CRM On Demand Statement of Direction

All, the Oracle CRM On Demand Statement of Direction document is now available in MetaLink. The Doc ID is
734444.1

Can I get a copy of it also? The Doc ID 734444.1 cannot be found on MetaLink
Edited by: user4789162 on Nov 4, 2009 8:11 AM

Cash flow Statement via Direct method using BW

Hi Gurus,
I have an requirement to prepare Cash flow statement via direct method using BW. Can anyone advice or point me to the steps need to be done in order to achieve this
Thank you
BR

Hi,
It depends on your format of cash flow. You have to obtain a cash flow format and work accordingly to include the relevant GL accounts. I have given a sample format.
Operating Profit before Depreciation
Add (Less): Decrease / (Increase) in Working Capital
(Increase) / Decrease in Debtors
(Increase) / Decrease in Inventory
(Increase) / Decrease in Loans & Advances
Increase / (Decrease) in Creditors & Provisions
Less: (Capital Expenditure)
Net Cash generated from operations
Add: Opening Balance of Cash & Cash Equivalents
Less: Closing Balance of Cash & Cash Equivalents
Net Cash Outflow
Thanks
Aravind

Entity Bean Persisting It's Own State

Is there an advantage to codeing a bean to persists it's own state. I don't write many JavaBeans, and have used the Data Access Object Strategy to handle persistance.
Any suggestions on why or why not to have a bean persist it's own state would be appreciated.

I hope I got your question right cause it seems it can be interpreted in two ways.
My argument is that an object isn't responsible for persisting it's own state.
An object can be persisted in many different ways. Supporting all of these ways would cause the class to explode code size ways. You'd probaply be doing a lot of copy pasting and "discovering" that there is a great reuse potential. Too much for one class to handle. Better leave it to an established framework or code a small framework yourself. The DataAcces Object strategy is a commonly used and well established pattern. If your dao is an interface you can potentially plug-in lots of different persistence schemes.

What's a good solid-state drive for my Pro 1.1, c.250-500gb?

What's a good solid-state drive for my Pro 1.1, c.250-500gb?

I only in the last months learned about the XP941 as an option, and for all Mac Pro models.
And that was in the middle of a long thread that led me to look further.
SATA Express meets the '09 MacPro - Bootable NGFF PCIE SSD ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Last Page)
So the adapter is cheap $24-52 versus say Sonnet Tempo Pro SSD ($295) which is not even bootable in 2006/7.
No need for $15 Icy Dock. Does not take up drive bay or any of the 6 SATA II ports.
Yes up until last fall/winter the 840 EVO was fine, I have half a dozen ranging from 128GB up to 500GB and they work fine.
In the past I ended up using the Sonnet card just for data (graphic library for Adobe and iPhoto) and not the system.
Options are always good to have.

Latest Discoverer Statement of Direction on OTN

The latest Discoverer statement of Direction is now available from OTN:
Main Discoverer Page on OTN: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/discoverer/index.html
Direct link to Discoverer Statement of Direction: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/discoverer/pdf/discoverer_sod_2007.pdf

I did not see any release dates on the versions mentioned in the Statement of Direction. Has anyone heard any guesses? 2007, 2008, 2009? Accuracy in the date isn't important, just an approximation would be pleasant.

Statement of direction . . .

Hi,
I've read this Statement of Direction. I saw a couple of interesting remarks.
But one of them confuses me a little bit:
Note that htmldb.oracle.com is not an environment to deploy production applications.
Can someone explain to me Why? (or not), some Arguments to write this ?
Roel

Hi me!
Strange to reply to yourself.
After reading the document two times more I understand that this remark does tell something about the trial site that Oracle deploys as a service to their customers.
So, now I understand that HTML DB must be an environment to deploy production applications.
And I really agree with that!
Sorry I posted the first message
Roel

What is Nokia's own statement of direction regardi...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for