What is the best web browser

What is the fastest, safest and free web browser?

Safari works best for me, but there are others:
Browsers for Macs compared:
http://www.pure-mac.com/webb.html

Similar Messages

What is the best web browser for iPad 2

What is the best web browser for iPad 2?

I have Mercury, Atomic, Dolphin and iCab. They all offer features that Safari does not have. If you liked the former mini windows view that Safari had in iOS 4, I think iCab would be a great choice. It offers something similar to that as well as tabbed browsing, DropBox support, it can identify as other browsers (I can't remember what that feature is called) and IMO - it blows Safari out of the water.
All of these browsers have more to offer than Safari, but I like iCab the best.

What is the best web host?

Hi,
I have finished producing two websites. One of the websites is a personal website which holds all the films that I have helped produce. It is basically a CV for people to look at on the internet. It will be a large sized website, not sure how large it will be, but basically need a lot of space for it, I would imagine. I have also finished producing a website for a dentist practice which has over 500 pages. Its current size is 150MB but I have a feeling that I will be adding four images per page to the site, which will increase the size. Anyways, these have both been created with iWeb and I was wondering what is the best web host to publish these with? Now that MobileMe has gone and iCloud won't publish websites anymore, is there a certain web host that all of the iWeb users have rushed to to publish their sites? I have looked at a lot of the hosts and they all seem confusing and their own business websites look confusing, which puts me off buying from them. I am looking for the cheapest host, that would allow me to host two website, so the dentist website and my own personal website, with no bandwidth limit or disk space limit. I have read the small print on two of the 'best' web hosts that say that they have 'unlimited' bandwidth and disk space and they say that it is not unlimited and they will either charge me more for exceeding the limit or they will shut the website down. The problem is that they don't state what their limit is so I am guessing that it is a scam. They are also only charging around £2 per month, which is fine but you have to buy like 2 years with them for that price. I don't want to do that. Would prefer it if there was a host that has a free trail, even if it is as little as 24 hours trial. Would also like to not be tied in for longer than 1 year. I would also like a host that has the domain names included in the price.
Overall, this is all getting too confusing for me and there is so much to take in. I just want to know, what is everyone doing now that MobileMe has shut down and iCloud does not allow Web Publishing?
A list of people's prefered web hosts would be amazing please. Also a breif description as to why you think it is better than all of the rest.
Thank you for your time and effort.
All the best,
George.

The most important consideration with website hosting is reliability and good tech support - not price!
Host Excellence offer a 30 day money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. Also read aout the "Anytime Money Back Guarantee".
Be suspicious of cheap offers. For example, Yahoo offers a registration for 10 bucks but wants 35 after that. Try getting tech support from them!
"I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link."

Is Safari The Best Web Browser?

I Have been dissapointed lately with safari, its always seem to be slow & i have cable. the pages sometimes take forever or get errors, plus alot of video dont play. i was wondering if anyone has tried and can say that there are other browsers that are better. i was thinkin along the lines of firefox or netscape...
What is the best, fastest web browser available for mac osx?
thanks!

Shiira is really fast, but it crashes from time to time.
Currently I use Camino, but after installing Beta 2 yesterday I've had some strange hangups... so I might switch back to Opera pretty soon.

What is the best alternate browser for the classic?

I would like to try an alternate browser and I see several available at the app store.
What is the best one?

Hello,
"Best" is a terribly subjective term...best for one person could be horrible for another. I might suggest you provide more details of exactly the features and functions you are needing, and then perhaps someone could provide you with alternatives to try out.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

What is the best web page to watch tv when I'm abroad

What is the best website to watch tv when I'm abroad

I prefer to use apps personally, search the app store

What is the best web compression ?

Hi all web compression experts,
I have been trying to find out what is the optimum settings for files to be downloaded on the facebook. The limit I set is 100MB.
But when i rendered my 6.5 mins video in FCE, the filesize for the .mov file is a whopping 1.8GB. After much trial & error, I follow Diana's instruction in her Apple Pro Training book. Below is the summary of the steps she taught me in her book:
Video:
Compression: MPEG-4 Video
Frame Rate: 15 fps
Keyframe: 5
Data Field Rate: 700 kbits/s
Quality: Best
Size:
Dimension: Custom; I typed in 480 x 270
Sound:
Format: AAC
Channel: Stereo
Rate: 32 kHz
DESELECT prepare for Internet Streaming.
With the above settings, my file size has been reduced to 35MB. So I can still afford to add another 65MB before it reach 100MB. I tried to change the compression to H.264 but whenever this option is chosen, the file reach 400MB and took ages to render.
I have also change to the frame rate to 25 fps but there is no difference in the filesize & picture quality.
Can someone be kind enough to gimme some tips on what the numbers in the setting "Keyframe: 5" & "Data Field Rate: 700 kbits/s" do to the video ?
Is keyframe 5 better than keyframe 10 ?
Any suggestion?
Thnaks

skalicki` wrote:
Hi again Ryan,
I just got very good results exporting as suggested by Vimeo in this link:
http://vimeo.com/help/compression
Format: Quicktime Movie
Codec for video: H.264
Frame-rate: Current
Keyframes: Every 30 frames
Data rate: 5000 kbits/s
Size: 1280x720
De-interlace: Yes
Sound codec: AAC
Sound Sample Rate: 44.1kHz
Audio Quality: 128kbps
I didn't see much reduction in quality, and it reduced a 457MB file to 19MB. Judging by my calculations, if a 457MB file was reduced to 19MB, a 1.8GB file should be reduced to 72MB. Something to try perhaps?
Thanks skalicki`& dpapa,
I tried the above settings but it took ages to render. When it reached 45 mins, I gave up. By & large, whenever I use H.264 it takes very long to render !

What's the best internet browser that os 9.1 can run?

does anyone know what the best free internet browser is for os 9.1?
thanks,
ken

Hello kjp2007 & Welcome to Discussions,
Well, it pretty much depends on who you ask as to what the best browser is for OS 9.1
There are a few and you have to decide which one best suits your needs.
I think I can speak for everyone when I say that Internet Explorer is a no no because, one, it's a memory hog and two Microsoft no longer provides support for it's Mac version.
Nestscape:
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macos/14861&mode=feedback
iCab:
http://www.icab.de/
There are a few other browsers you could look at, but again you are the best judge.
Mic

What are the Best Web File Export settings?

I am running Premiere Pro CS3 on Win XP SP3, 4 GB RAM. I have tried several settings exporting a 2 1/2 minutes movie trailer to Windows Media Player, .flv, Quicktime, and Real Video files, so that I can add it to a web site for downloading. Of course, all of these are compressed files. I've tried very many settings but am having trouble getting a relatively good quality resolution file that is small enough to load fairly quickly. The best file is a Quicktime file. However, even though the movie plays in a small window, it is 41 MB (a big file).
Please share any settings that have produced a good quality file under 10 MB.
Thanks,
Linda

> You just need to use a larger file or settle for less quality
This is not always exactly true. There are many things that can affect the perceived quality. In Premiere's case:
1.) Deinterlacing: If your sources are interlaced, Premiere (by default) will deinterlace them before scaling down for web export. Premiere's deinterlacer is as bad as it gets. If you are doing a ratio >= 2:1 (such as 480i -> 240p) it is probably better to untick the "deinterlace" checkbox, as the line-pairs will be blended on output anyway because of the large scaling ratio.
2.) Soft scaling: Premiere's Bicubic resampling is not really ideal for large ratio reductions. Unfortunately, there is not much way around this without using other tools.
3.) Noise: Video noise can greatly reduce the efficiency of encoding -- and therefore, when using a set data rate, it makes lowers quality output. Premiere does have a noise reduction filter option in AME, but it is quite slow and not the most sophisticated solution. You may want to experiment with it anyway: It can potentially make low bandwidth encodes look much better.
4.) Frame rate: It seems like a basic concept, but many people forget that you can greatly increase your spatial quality by reducing the frame rate. If you can live without the motion smoothness of 30 fps, you can get much higher quality with 15 fps at the same data rate.
5.) Two-pass Encoding: Unfortunately, Premiere does not have 2-pass for FLV VP6 which, IMO, is probably the "best looking" web output. You should look at other tools like Sorenson Squeeze or On2 Flix. In these cases you'll need to export a lossless intermediary AVI file to maximize quality.

What's the best Web content filter for managing client's on our network

We have a somewhat mini scale network. We have anywhere from 40 to 60 ranging from WLan and Lan devices. Right now we have been using opendns for content filtering but we would like to limit certain sites to just certain groups and if someone goes onto a site they shouldn't then what we would like to know is the IP of the user and there mac address If we could somehow find a captive portal software or hardware that would be perfect because it takes a lot of guess work out of things. We use Apple Wireless router's and run 2 server's one running Mac OSX Server 10.6.7 and a 2nd server running the same which act's as our OD replica
So my question is what do you guys use?
Were looking for the more user friendly the better and by that i mean I don't want to be using ww-rt on some router or something
Thank you for your time.

Johnny.Danger wrote:
We have a somewhat mini scale network. We have anywhere from 40 to 60 ranging from WLan and Lan devices. Right now we have been using opendns for content filtering but we would like to limit certain sites to just certain groups and if someone goes onto a site they shouldn't then what we would like to know is the IP of the user and there mac address If we could somehow find a captive portal software or hardware that would be perfect because it takes a lot of guess work out of things. We use Apple Wireless router's and run 2 server's one running Mac OSX Server 10.6.7 and a 2nd server running the same which act's as our OD replica
So my question is what do you guys use?
Were looking for the more user friendly the better and by that i mean I don't want to be using ww-rt on some router or something
Thank you for your time.
Have a look at Vicomsoft and their Intergate Inspect package. This runs on a Mac server and lets you link to Open Directory for authenticating users and lets you set filtering for users or for groups of users. Sounds exactly what you want.
See http://www.vicomsoft.com/products/filter/index.html

What is the best web publishing software?

I know this probably isnt the place to post this, but i figured a lot of other business owners my have mbp's. I will probably have my new 15" c2d by the end of this week, or the start of next. I want to start using it immediately to build a good website for my business. I have no idea where to start when it comes to mac software, so any info would be helpful. Oh yeah, iweb isn't an option for me, since i dont want a .mac account. Thanks!

I've found the following:
- Dreamweaver is for hard-core web development, can do everything but is not necessarily "newbie" friendly, there is a learning curve, and it helps if you've had some web experience. It is the program you will eventually get if you get in to website development in any serious way.
- iWeb is the other end of the spectrum, need no experience, it's all drag and drop and like using a word processor. You are limited to a set number of things you can do with the webpages you create, but the program does those few things gracefully as only Apple can. You may get frustrated with its limitations over time. As far as I know, you need a .Mac account to make use of it, I think you "could" save the web pages it creates and upload elsewhere, but I don't think it's easy at the moment.
- In between the above two is Rapidweaver. It is nowhere near as powerful as Dreamweaver but lets you do a lot more editing and "messing around" with your webpages than iWeb does. You can also upload Rapidweaver creations to either .Mac or your own web host. The thing I like most about Rapidweaver is the stunningly beautiful templates it comes with.
OK, that's my experience, hope it is helpful.

What Is The Best All-round Canvas Size For A Web Browser

What is the best all-round canvas size when authoring a swi
for a web browser? by this I mean best for authoring without
scrollbars. I know a chap whose screen res is 800x600 and who has
every single toolbar displayed in IE, leaving around 400pixels in
height free. For crying out loud.
I once sat with a bloke who uses Courier New set at 36pt as
his default browser font. Ouch. I sat there transfixed, not
believing what I was looking at; to this day I have no recollection
of our conversation, so stunned was I.
I've used 780x410, 800x600, 770x540 and I'm going nutsoid
trying to find the best compromise; whatever size I use, distortion
creeps in if accompanied with an "exactfit" value, especially if
the height and Width values are set at 100%.
Beats me.
What are you guys using?

Hrududu wrote:
> What is the best all-round canvas size when authoring a
swi for a web browser?
> by this I mean best for authoring without scrollbars. I
know a chap whose
> screen res is 800x600 and who has every single toolbar
displayed in IE, leaving
> around 400pixels in height free. For crying out loud.
>
> I once sat with a bloke who uses Courier New set at 36pt
as his default
> browser font. Ouch. I sat there transfixed, not
believing what I was looking
> at; to this day I have no recollection of our
conversation, so stunned was I.
>
> I've used 780x410, 800x600, 770x540 and I'm going
nutsoid trying to find the
> best compromise; whatever size I use, distortion creeps
in if accompanied with
> an "exactfit" value, especially if the height and Width
values are set at 100%.
personally avoid scaling, especially filling up user window.
more and more really high resolution monitors out there,
the larger the screen the more CPU it sucks...
Don't follow the exact screen size like 800x600 as it is
never the
browser ratio, must consider the browser chromes.
I will design something within that size or slightly larger
and use the
around margin to incorporate graphics as part of the design.
Sometimes even smaller than that and centralized. Depends on
amount
of content.

What is the best practice for full browser video to achieve the highest quality?

I'd like to get your thoughts on the best way to deliver full-browser (scale to the size of the browser window) video. I'm skilled in the creation of the content but learning to make the most out of Flash CS5 and would love to hear what you would suggest.
Most of the tutorials I can find on full browser/scalable video are for earlier versions of Flash; what is the best practice today? Best resolution/format for the video?
If there is an Adobe guide to this I'm happy to eat humble pie if someone can redirect me to it; I'm using CS5 Production Premium.
I like the full screen video effect they have on the "Sounds of pertussis" web-site; this is exactly what I'm trying to create but I'm not sure what is the best way to approach it - any hints/tips you can offer would be great?
Thanks in advance!

Use the little squares over your video to mask the quality. Sounds of Pertussis is not full screen video, but rather full stage. Which is easier to work with since all the controls and other assets stay on screen. You set up your html file to allow full screen. Then bring in your video (netstream or flvPlayback component) and scale that to the full size of your stage (since in this case it's basically the background) . I made a quickie demo here. (The video is from a cheapo SD consumer camera, so pretty poor quality to start.)
In AS3 is would look something like
import flash.display.Loader;
import flash.net.URLRequest;
import flash.display.Bitmap;
import flash.display.BitmapData;
import flash.ui.Mouse;
import flash.events.Event;
import flash.events.MouseEvent;
import flash.display.StageDisplayState;
stage.align = StageAlign.TOP_LEFT;
stage.scaleMode = StageScaleMode.NO_SCALE;
// determine current stage size
var sw:int = int(stage.stageWidth);
var sh:int = int(stage.stageHeight);
// load video
var nc:NetConnection = new NetConnection();
nc.connect(null);
var ns:NetStream = new NetStream(nc);
var vid:Video = new Video(656, 480); // size off video
this.addChildAt(vid, 0);
vid.attachNetStream(ns);
//path to your video_file
ns.play("content/GS.f4v");
var netClient:Object = new Object();
ns.client = netClient;
// add listener for resizing of the stage so we can scale our assets
stage.addEventListener(Event.RESIZE, resizeHandler);
stage.dispatchEvent(new Event(Event.RESIZE));
function resizeHandler(e:Event = null):void
// determine current stage size
    var sw:int = stage.stageWidth;
    var sh:int = stage.stageHeight;
// scale video size depending on stage size
    vid.width = sw;
    vid.height = sh;
// Don't scale video smaller than certain size
    if (vid.height < 480)
    vid.height = 480;
    if (vid.width < 656)
    vid.width = 656;
// choose the smaller scale property (x or y) and match the other to it so the size is proportional;
    (vid.scaleX > vid.scaleY) ? vid.scaleY = vid.scaleX : vid.scaleX = vid.scaleY;
// add event listener for full screen button
fullScreenStage_mc.buttonMode = true;
fullScreenStage_mc.mouseChildren = false;
fullScreenStage_mc.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, goFullStage, false, 0, true);
function goFullStage(event:MouseEvent):void
    //vid.fullScreenTakeOver = false; // keeps flvPlayer component from becoming full screen if you use it instead
    if (stage.displayState == StageDisplayState.NORMAL)
        stage.displayState=StageDisplayState.FULL_SCREEN;
    else
        stage.displayState=StageDisplayState.NORMAL;

What's the best way for a web app to handle logins and sessions?

I'm deploying in JBoss, using JSF. As is often the case, I keep User information in an entity bean. My question is, what's the best way to handle this bean?
My inclination is to create a login page with a LoginBackingBean atached to it. When the user attempts to log in, it will see if there is a User entity bean that corresponds to the given name and password. If there is no User bean that matches, obviously we show an informative error screen.
But what happens if there is a valid user?
In the plain old Servlet world (without EJB / J2EE) I would just put the User object (it's an object, not an EJB) into the HttpSession, and I would create a Filter that would check for the presence of that User object, and I would map the filter to something like /members/*, and that would be it. I would use Hibernate to persist the User object, and there would also be a filter that creates a Hibernate session and stores it in the Request so that the User object would work and persist.
How do I do this within the J2EE / EJB world?
My first thought would be to just do the same thing. Install the User bean into the HttpSession, and create a filter and do all the same stuff. Is that the right way to do it? It would work pretty well with JSF because I could just access things in the normal JSF way: #{user.firstName} would find the "user" object in the HttpSession scope. So that's good.
One question that comes up from that is if the user makes some change to the User object that is in the Session scope, will the EJB automatically do the right thing and make those changes persistent? Is there anything else I need to do?
I'm new to the EJB world, but from what I can see so far, it seems like it's the best way to think about a web application.
Thanks

hi ,
i think the best way is to create java beans ,in that bean call your EJB ,
and check the validation over there.
and make that bean scope to session.
in each and everypage try to check the session ,if it is not valid then forward to your login page...
otherwise continue to give access to him like guest
Regards,
AfTaB

What is the best way of reading a browser cookie and writing to sessionbean

Hi,
So far I have happily written a cookie in the visting browser and happily can display with a browser using a servlet println etc
But what is the best way to take that value and put it into say getSessionBean1().setCookieValue("Cookievalue");
I was thinking on the lines of calling a forward from the servlet "nexpage?cookievalue=stringetc".... or is there some nicer way?
Thanks
James

In the page I simply referenced the facescontext directly... no need for a custom servlet.
public void createcookie() {
FacesContext fc = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
HttpServletResponse resp = (HttpServletResponse)fc.getExternalContext().getResponse();
Cookie userCookie = new Cookie("cookiename", "cookievalue");
userCookie.setMaxAge(-1);
userCookie.setMaxAge(3600);
resp.addCookie(userCookie);
return null;
public String readcookie() {
FacesContext fc = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
ExternalContext ec = fc.getExternalContext();
Map cookiemap = ec.getRequestCookieMap();
if (cookiemap != null) {
Cookie cookie = (Cookie) cookiemap.get("cookievalue");
return cookievalue;
For reference I could not get getCookies() method of HttpServletRequest to work.. it would only return JSESSIONID.

What is the best web browser

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for