What is the deal with the crazy zooming when I drag the playhead??

What is the deal with the zooming in with the dragging of the playhead??? I'm sure I can adjust/turn off this feature in the preferences. How could i use this to benefit me? How would it? It seems so spastically erratic!

I use it quite a bit for zooming in and out (by dragging up and down) but you have to be careful you don't move left or right when doing this as it then becomes a bit unpredictable as you say...
If you just want to use the playhead for dragging left and right (and if you can't find a pref to turn it off) you'll just have to be careful to drag only in the horizontal axis and not up or down..
Cheers
Robo

Similar Messages

What could be wrong with my iMac? When switched on the screen displays the apple logo with a busy bar at the bottom of the screen. This displays the progress of the computer trying to do something. To fill the bar takes about 30 mins and then switches off

What could be wrong with my iMac? When switched on the screen displays the apple logo with a busy bar at the bottom of the screen. This displays the progress of the computer trying to do something. To fill the bar takes about 30 mins and then switches off

Which OS X is installed?

I can export many iphoto events to a Data stick. I want to do the same with a DVD. When I do the DVD window is blank. If I drag and drop can only do one. Help

I can "export", using file, many iphoto events to a data disk. When I do the same to a DVD the DVD window is blank and nothing has been exported. When I use drag and drop to a DVD it works but I can only get one event on the disk. How do I export many iphoto events to a DVD. I am using a write only DVD. I am using a Mac Book Pro OS 10. Thanks in advance.
Gord

When I click on the data stick icon on my desk top a window comes up. It lists the various events that I have exported. If i click on an event each picture shows up in a list. I can click on the picture and view a jpeg photo or view a avi video. When I export I select "original" as the file type. When I export to a DVD and klick on the the DVD icon the window shows up but it is blank.

I tried updating to the latest version of Firefox. When I dragged the icon to 'applications', it failed to complete the process. I'm running Mac OS 10.5.8

Details are included in question.

If there are problems with updating or with the permissions then easiest is to download the full version and trash the currently installed version to do a clean install of the new version.
Download a new copy of the Firefox program and save the disk image (dmg) file to the desktop
* Firefox 7.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Trash the current Firefox application to do a clean (re-)install
* Install the new version that you have downloaded
Your profile data is stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder, so you won't lose your bookmarks and other personal data if you uninstall and (re)install Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

I am trying to download the newest version of firefox and when i drag the firefox to the folder it states that i do not have sufficient privelges to do it

After it is downloaded it asks if i want to replace an existing version, i say yes and then drag the firefox icon to the folder and it staes that i do not have sufficient privileges to this.

3.6.18 is the last version of Firefox for Mac OSX 10.4
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/4.0/system-requirements/
Mac
Operating Systems
* Mac OS X 10.5
* Mac OS X 10.6
Recommended Hardware
* Macintosh computer with an Intel x86 processor
* 512 MB of RAM
* 200 MB hard drive space

What is the deal with itunes12.1.1 when the computer states the latest software is 11.4

I cannot sync new iPod nano to my iMac. Manual states to download 12.1.1 but iMac states 11.4 is most uptodate.

Have a look here > How to trouble-shoot iOS 7.1 battery problems

Wow! What is the deal with iTunes?

Ever since I upgraded to Leopard, iTunes has been incredibly flaky. It just stops playing songs! Crazy. Very annoying. Tonight, out of the blue, my airport express will show a low signal and iTunes will say there has been some error connecting to my remote speakers. I guess I can see an error with the wireless connection, although it has never happened before, but the deal with iTunes just stopping a song mid stream is really crazy. Very random. Man I should have stuck with Tiger. All sorts of strangeness happening with Leopard, even though I erased and installed. Any thoughts?

What version of iTunes are you running?
What version of QuickTime are you using?
Have you applied the latest updates to your APE?
MJ

I opened a file on my desktop that I don't remember putting there. It turned out to be a keychain certificate from a client of ours. Does this mean that they were spying on me? What is the deal with that? Any ideas?

I opened a file on my desktop that I don't remember putting there. We use many photos and I thought it was a photo file I was looking for. It turned out to be a keychain certificate from a client of ours. Does this mean that they were spying on me? What is the deal with that? Any ideas?

Interesting tid bit. I created an AAC of the original file, deleted the original MP3 from my library and also deleted the Clean matched track from the icloud.
Result is that it matched with the explicit version of Mrs. Officer this time.
What I am curious about is which songs this is happening for. I've went thru a few batched of about 500 songs at a time and redownloaded in 256k for many tracks. Sadly we don't have people to bring this to our attention and I have so much music that it's impossible to go thru every song to make sure I am getting the right version.

What's the deal with dual processors???

The whole dual processor thing has been bugging me for some time now. If I have a dual 500mhz processor, is it the same as a 1.0ghz processor, worse than one, better than one?! Are there other factors at play? In my limited scope, if you had a dual 500, 533, whatever, it would be the same as a single 1.0ghz - and yet these dual processors are priced much cheaper. I really am at a loss as to how computers do their processing, and how to compare single processor G4's and dual processor G4's when making a purchase.
Insight would be greatly appreciated!

And you shouldn't forget, the future is multiprocessors. There is a limit to miniturization, and the solution seems to be multiplication. So operating systems and applications are increasingly going to be multiprocessor-aware. Maybe a perfect example is the upcoming MacOS release, Snowleopard. Apparently, there will be almost no cosmetic changes. The changes will essentially be 'under-the-hood'. And you can bet, that some of those changes will be increased efficiency with respect to multiple processors.
So what's the deal with airplane peanu...err, dual processors?
The advantage, theoretically is, having more workers to do the work. Your 1ghz processor is like a worker who can lift 100kg, and your 500mhz are like workers who can lift 50kg each.
So where's the advantage? If you have a farm with 40 kg hay bales in the field that you need to pick up, your better off with two workers than one right? Or 8 workers in the case of a 8-core MacPro. So an multiprocessor-aware operating system, doles out the work much more efficiently, spreading the tasks around, or spreading a single task around in pieces (if the app is so written).
You've heard of render farms? The multiple computers used to render the frames of animated movies? Its the same principle. Having computer 1 render the first 1000 frames and computer 2 the next, the project gets done within a lifetime. If they had had only one computer, ToyStory would still not be finished.
Its the future. Just wait till the end of this year for example. Nehalem chips will be sporting even more processors.
Try these;
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1619399&tstart=0
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070605-intel-updates-compilers-for-multic ore-era.html
Nehalem; http://techreport.com/discussions.x/12130

What's the deal with the battery?

I just bought a new video iPod a few days ago. I've loaded all of my songs onto it, and loaded a few videos on it also. I've FULLY charged it, and I watched about 15 minutes of video on it. After that video is done, it says the battery is at about 1/3rd full. 1/3rd battery life after 15 minutes of video, then I play a few songs, and the battery meter goes up to about half full. Then after a few songs I play another video and the battery meter immediately goes to 0% full. What in the world is the deal with this thing? Is it accurate? If it is, can this really be that I can only watch about 20 minutes of video on it until the battery is completely dead? Anyone else having this issue?
Thanks in advance.
Danny
iMac

First you really need to try charging your ipod to full then run it empty then charge it again, do this three or four times and it will sync your meter to your ipod. Please note though that the meter is a guide and just a guide, it does not always acuratly display the correct charge of your battery. I have noticed when I have my video on, my meter is lower then when I am playing songs. But I have found that mine is fairly acurate when I first turn it on before I play songs or do anything. I always check it that way so I have a good idea of where I am at. It takes out all the variables, but I have had my nano in the red and gotten 5 hours out of it... so go figure... my video when it hits red, has maybe 1 hr tops.. depending on what I am doing, if it is video... like 20 mins or less.

What's the deal with the video format?

Hello! What is the deal with the video format? Does it mean I have to code the videos for 640*480 ? It won't accept any other size? What size do I need to select for widescreen format?
With Quicktime pro I've been able to encode videos with a very nice resolution and small size, then try to synch them to the ipod touch and then the error, it can't be played. I use the .mov format, I like it more but if I have to use .mp4 then I'll use it.
Thanks for the help!

According to Apple's Specification, these are your video choices
H.264 video, up to 1.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Low-Complexity version of the H.264 Baseline Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats.
H.264 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Baseline Profile up to Level 3.0 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats.
MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats.
http://support.apple.com/kb/SP496

What's the deal with AmEx?

I'm currently rebuilding after a period of unemployment and lower income during the recession. From the second half of 2012 on, I have had no new chargeoffs/lates on any of my credit reports.
Within the past year, I opened new deposit accounts with Bank of America and Capital One (360), and following that, both banks have issued credit cards to me. The two cards from Cap One are unsecured and have small limits, and the limit on each card was increased after five months. The BoA card is the 99/500, and I expect I'll get the $99 back within a year or so.
With several years of clean history now, I tried applying for a simple AmEx card, and of course was abruptly turned down. I even escalated the application to their executive office, pointing to the clean history, and was rudely turned away.
While Cap One obviously caters to the whole credit spectrum, BoA is a prime lender, and both "big banks" have clearly made efforts to supply products that I need and to invest in me as a long-term customer.
AmEx, on the other hand, is a mystery. I don't need their prepaid products, as I already have deposit accounts, but a charge or credit card with them would be helpful, but they don't want anything to do with me. What's the deal? They're facing enough headwinds between the loss of the Costco account, the lawsuit earlier this year, and the poaching of affluent customers by the other issuers. And I know they're aware of it - just a few days ago I filled out an e-rewards survey that was clearly commissioned by AmEx, as it asked for perceptions of Amex compared to issuers including Chase, and whether I would consider each issuer when applying for a card.

krmurrayjr10 wrote:
I would feel differently if these were still with the original creditors, but when the OCs sold them to the junk debt buyers, their interest in them disappeared, and it's now a matter of how much money, if any, the JDBs should receive when they themselves acquired the accounts for a few pennies.
And I think it's a mistake to look at this with any greater sense of morality than the banks do. Their business is modeled on how much "y" they can get for "x", and when Mr. Jones applies for credit to fix his leaky roof and shelter his family, no one at the bank is thinking about the welfare of his children in deciding whether to give him a home equity loan. I'm just looking at it on the same level as they do: if I send $ to JDB Inc., what will I get in return?
Thus, my original question: what is the relative importance of 3 chargeoffs 4 years ago against a more recent period of clean history, or at what point (call it a score, if you will) are the chargeoffs not predictive?Actually, I have to say I don't really disgree with you on this. When it comes to paying collectors (JDBs), I look at it purely in terms of "whats in my best interest?" Any moral obligation, AFAIC, evaporates when the OC decides to sell my debt for pennies on the dollar - after that its simply a matter of whats best for me. Sooo... again I ask, are ANY of the OCs reporting the charge-offs with an unpaid balance? That makes a difference in how you should proceed, IMO. As for your question, you really do have to look at it from the perspective of the lender. Different lenders *do* have different standards regarding this - some put much more weight on recent history and will forgive past issues (like Capital One), while others put less weight on recent history.. AMEX is one that puts less. Both are business decisions and both are valid and work well for each company.

What's the deal with the CC menubar panel?

What's the deal with the CC menubar panel? The tab to the apps are gone -- looks like it wants me to update the panel itself rather than list my installed apps. I've been on CC for about a month, is this common? Thankfully I can still open all apps normally, but the internet seems to think the "CC Way" is a horror show.
Do you guys have trouble after updating the updater? All this talk of running "the cleaner" (a mafia term?) and reinstalling everything with each version bump is kinda scary. It could be that people only post online when things go wrong, and 95% of people update just fine. But since I'm new I guess I'd want some reassurance before committing to a night of Cleaning and Reinstalling...
I'm one of those people who think app updates very 12 to 18 months was just fine (and stable). Would it be harmful to ignore updates for a few months? Lets see, I have a healing brush, smart objects, a blob tool, pretty good 3D in AE, ID seems to handle type pretty well… there's really no reason to update every month is there?
-- Jim

Has anyone had a normal non-cleaning install of this week's update?

What's the deal with Quicktime?

What's the deal with Quicktime? In the past, there was just plain Quicktime. Then it was separated into two different versions: Standard and Pro. I bought the Pro version for my eMac. Then, when I moved to my 24" iMac, Quicktime was made into just one version again, and the features were rolled into it. Now that I have my 27" iMac running Lion, I find that a bunch of the menu items are greyed out and have the word "Pro" next to them. Also, I'm finding that it can't open many standard files, such as .MOV files that run fine on my older Mac, because "a required codec is not available." What's going on?

There are two versions of QuickTime Player available for Snow Leopard and Lion systems. The QuickTime Player X included with those versions of Mac OS X have some of the features previously only available with a Pro key to unlock QuickTime Player 7.
QuickTime Player 7 is an optional installation on SL and Lion, and apparently you installed it or it carried over across an update. If you wish the Pro features activated, you need to enter in your Pro key just as you did previously (you will need a key for QuickTime 7; an older key will not work). Then the Pro features will be available again, though support for some old codecs is no longer available. For more information, see:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3678
Regards.

What's the deal with the swoosh sound when sending texts? IOS 5.1 needs to have an option to turn it off., What's the deal with the swoosh sound when sending texts? IOS 5.1 needs to have an option to turn it off.

What's the deal with the swoosh sound when sending texts? IOS 5.1 needs to have an option to turn it off., What's the deal with the swoosh sound when sending texts? IOS 5.1 needs to have an option to turn it off.

Trax and kirt are correct. I'm pretty good with technology, being an engineer and all, and I can tell you for a fact that this 'swoosh' sound (triggered by a successfully sent SMS) can NOT be disabled from ANY menu in iOS 5. The ONLY way to disable it is to flip the silent switch on the left hand side of the phone. This is extremely annoying for some people (like trax, kirt, and myself). For what we pay for Apple products and, in particular, this phone, we simply didn't expect to have to deal with such annoyances. That's why we're Mac users. Please fix this bug.
I feel like I shouldn't have to say this but it bears repeating: turning off message sounds from the 'sounds' menu does not fix his problem. It still emits the swoosh noise. Whoever suggested this clearly didn't try it because it obviously doesn't work. Who posts a solution to a problem without knowing for a fact that their solution is correct? I find that response condescending because he writer is assuming we're not smart enough to have tried it. In reality, it's vice versa.

What is the deal with the crazy zooming when I drag the playhead??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for