What is the diffrent to encode in pal or ntsc?

hi
my source is analoge pal STB and i want to encode live streaming to FMS wordwide (us and europe)
what is diffrent between pal and ntsc?
what is best method to config?
thanks

If your source is PAL then use PAL settings, ie resolution that is the same aspect ratio of the PAL signal and also no more than 25fps. When being viewed on a computer it really doesn’t matter as the client isn’t constrained to formats like that.
You will probably get a better quality encode from PAL as the slightly lower frame rate means more bits per frame. Colours are usually more reliable from PAL also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAL#PAL_vs._NTSC
Matthew Quinn
Systems Coordinator
Digital Media Department
t: 0151 293 8720 | m: 07887 735 405
f: 0151 293 8722 | w: http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/
a: Unit 14, The Matchworks, Speke Rd, Liverpool, L19 2RF
Please consider the environment before printing this email

Similar Messages

What is the diffrent bettween in coming trust and outgoing trus?

Hi all,
What is the different between incoming trust and outgoing trust?
Also, What is the diffrent between incoming trust and one way trust? I think in tow, we can just inputing.
Future is mine!

Here's another, yet simple way to look at it:
A trust is a simple, yet secure communication channel. Internal Forest trusts between the parent root domain and child domains, and the parent root domain and domain trees in a forest, and manually created Forest trusts between two forests, are
all two way, transitive trusts.
Any other type of manually created trusts, such as domain to domain NTLM (NT4 style) trusts, and realm trusts, are one way, non-transitive trusts, except a Shortcut trust within a forest, which are manually created one way transitive trusts
Note: The trust direction of the arrow is pointing to the user account's home (domain) that YOU are letting in to YOUR home (domain) to use YOUR resources (such as a refrigerator, bathroom, shared folder, files, etc).
So if DomainA ----> trusts -----> DomainB - means that DomainA is letting user accounts from DomainB access it's resources.
DomainA is the *trusting* domain, and DomainB is the trusted domain.
How about if I toss you the keys to my car? What did I just do? I trusted you. I am the trusting domain (outbound trust because I am extending the trust to trust you), and you are the trusted domain where you are accepting the trust, hence inbound trust
on your part.
Take it a step further .... How about ifI tossed you the keys to my house? Same thing, I am the *trusting* domain (outbound trust), and you are the *trusted* domain (inbound trust).
Oh wait, even if I did that, you still don't have access to the beer in the fridge.
So what I must do now, because the trust is setup where I trust you, the accounts from your domain now show up in the list that I can choose from. Because of the trust, I can see and choose your account to now give you permissions to the folder,
err, I mean the fridge.
If I give you read access, you can only look at the beer. But that isn't any fun though. If I gave you modify or full control, then you can enjoy the beer.
I use this method to teach trusts to my AD class. I hope you've found it helpful.
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCSE 2012, MCITP EA & MCTS Windows 2008/R2, Exchange 2013, 2010 EA & 2007, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Complete List of Technical Blogs: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/technicalblogs.php
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

What's the recommended import encoding for best 'practical' ipod use?

I just really found out that you can change the import encoding for different quality sound and such and I'm wondering what is the best or most practical quality setting for use on my IPOD? Also how about the best, period? It would be nice to have my favorite albums on my ITUNES in the best quality I can have them.
Most of my songs are AAC encoded, 128 kbps, 44.1khz, low-complexity, stereo.
A while ago I was messing around and changed preferences settings and so some music is encoded as MPEG-1 Layer 3, 160kbps, joint stereo, ID3-v2.2.
How would you import?
Thanks!

Meg has a good memory. I do rip in AAC@256 VBR. After experimenting around for about 2 years or so, I have found that this setting yields the best audio quality for my tastes. You have to keep in mind what kind of equipment you are using. If you are using Apple earbuds & internal computer speakers, then it's doubtful that you will be able to tell much difference. I use Shure SE310 earphones & Bose Companion 5 speakers with my computer, so I can most definitely tell lower audio quality files. The last thing to remember is that ripping at a higher bitrate or with a Lossless format will increase the size of your files & thus use more room on your iPod. My AAC@256 files are 2x the size of the same files ripped @128. This doesn't matter to me as I recently purchased a 160GB Classic a few months ago. Hope this helps.

What is the best video encoder?

I used 'Handbrake'... made the playback extremely sluggish. What's the best way to go?

That's the one!! Thanks!
here's a link to that free file:
http://www.squared5.com/

What are the diffrent ways to copy data from one application to another?

Hi,
Can you guys tell me what are the different ways to copy data from one application to another application??
I know we can do it through script logic using DESTINATION_APP.
Is there any other way to copy data from one application to another application?
Please help me
Thanks,
Charly

You can also call a custom DTSX package in SSIS via the datamanager.
there are at least 5 ways of transfering data in BPC between apps.
1. Through the front end (excel etc) via evdre/evsnds
2. Through Script logic using *Dest App
3. Using BPC's standard export dtsx package via DM
4. Using SSIS using BPC's custom SSIS tasks
5. Through Script logic using stored procs.
i am sure people will come up with more.
remember if you use ssis and move data into any table but the wb, you need to process the cube afterwards.

What is the maximum bit rate for a short NTSC standard def DVD?

I have about 30 minutes of content from FCP that I want to put on a DVD.
At first I tried iDVD and had problems with burning (although I did somehow make one DVD). So I built the project on DVD SP and made a DVD. However, the iDVD version looked much better. I checked out the file sizes and saw that there was 2 gigs on iDVD and only 1.6 DVD SP. Then I discovered the encoding options on DVD SP and I was curious what is the recommended average and maximum bit rate should be for the highest quality, yet still works in most DVD players?
Thanks.

DVD Bandwidth
The rate is not based on running time.
Some thoughts on rates
7.2 - 8.0 seems to be the general consensus for discs from computers. I play more conservative for the reasson listed in that link

What is the Best DVD Encoder According to These Posts

I Have read many of the posts here and I was wondering, overall, which DVD ripping program I should use. I used DVD Ripper and that worker fine, except that it saved my DVD into 4 parts rather than one big one. Is there a better free program?
Also,I used iPod Converter (Videora) and that worker well too. Is there a better setting for more accurate proportions? On my iPod the people in my movie are too thin.
Thanks

Dante,
The reason the people in your movie "are too thin" is because when you encoded the file to use on your iPod, you were taking a 16:9 movie (or widescreen if you want to call it that) and converting it into a 4:3 movie (also known as full screen).
If you were using the default Videora settings, you probably had your screen size as 320x240. This is why the figures in the movie have been made to look thin. You took what was once a long rectangle and squeezed it into a much shorter rectangle. I suggest you change your settings (because this is what I did and get images that you were proportioned) in Videora to 320x176. This will give you a "widescreen" image when the file is transcoded. Just make sure that you are only using that for widescreen movies. If you take a fullscreen movie (such as an older television show or 80% of broadcast television today) and try to change it to 320x176, the figures will look short and fat.
Hope that helps. Took me a little while to figure out what settings to use, but I eventually got it to work just fine.

What is the best quality encoding ?

I am buring a DVD on iDVD8. I am trying to set the encoding. There are 3 options: Best Performance, High Quality and Professional Quality. Reading the iDVD quide, it was not clear at all, what would give me the best quality.
Set aside the background encoding, and all other factors, what would give the BEST quality out of the 3 options ?
Why Apple could not say that in simple words in the guide ?

Quoting F Shippey here:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5248366&#5248366
iDVD 6 offers 'Best Performance' (under 60 minutes on a SL disc) and 'Best Quality' encoding (under 120 minutes on a SL disc).
iDVD '08 offers 'Best Performance' (under 60 minutes on a SL disc), 'Best Quality' encoding (under 120 minutes on a SL disc) and 'Professional Quality' encoding (under 120 minutes on a SL disc).
With either version, if your content is under 60 minutes 'Best Performance' will give you the best quality!
If your content is OVER 60 minutes and under 120 minutes 'Professional Quality' in iDVD '08 should give better overall quality than 'Best Quality'
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5611104&#5611104
Message was edited by: SDMacuser

What is the best camera encoding format for use with iMovie09?

I may well get a new camera, so might as well get one that likes iMovie.
Probably not DV ...given the single field processing thing...
I'd like to get good quality results (ie: good image display on DVD) without getting into proffesionnal equipment. Let say a $500US budget.
What characteristics should I look for?
Should I stay away from HD or can I get good HD quality with iMovie09? (I dont have an HD television yet, but no doubt that will come)
Thanks!
By the way: I have Final Cut Express as well, but you know, I much prefer the iMovie09 interface because to me, this is just a hobby and I can not spend too much time dealing with a fairly complex program.
Message was edited by: yvonarchambault

Intel processor in you MB Pro? Need it to capture avchd.
regarding file size and the need for external drive:
"AVCHD output files are about 120Mb per minute of footage. The converted output file will be about four times the size of the input. This is because AVCHD is a highly compressed HD format and we are uncompressing it into a Quicktime-friendly high definition format. Our example 1 minute AVCHD clip becomes about 500Mb in size, after conversion.
The final size of a converted clip has a lot to do with the amount of movement in the clip. A lot of movement will mean a larger file. Action clips can be as high as 7 times the size of the raw clips."

What is the diffrent between a gray/silver/white iphone 6? answer please!!

Today!one of my friends said that the silver iphone6 is diffrent with grey and white iphone 6.i wanna know is it true...?! Does it mean that iphone 6 comes in white,gray,silver,gold...??!

The color is different, that's all.

What is the diffrent when i am using an iphone 6 that may had made in china/mexico/hongkong and when i an using an iphone wich had made in usa??

I Am worried about that my iphone have poor quallity and also bad for my health.because the IMEI says it had maden in china/mexico/HONGKONG(its 7,8th digits are 06)..help please.

Do not worry. It is the same quality as phones made in other locations.

Q: what is the diffrent between AUDIGY 2 ZS to X-

thanks

:smileysurprised: Oo?Audigy produces noise if DSP is used. X-FI does not.X-FI supports EAX5 and X-RAM. Audigy does not.X-FI has better audio quality, more power, better CMSS implementation and more problems ^^?X-FI supports 28 channels and is faster with 64 channels than a Audigy. Audigy supports 64 channels max.Audigy has got useless components added, like Firewire and a gameport. Firewire isnt needed. Gameport is included on mainboards today, so no additional gameport is needed. To add, u can buy a USB game/MIDI- Port adapter.
X-FI doesnt have these useless things, so it wont suck 3 interupts away and wont lead to interupt sharing regardless wich PCI slot u use. MIDI Port can be added to X-FI via breakout box or external box. (Elite pro/ Fatality/ platinum)
Message Edited by fffcmad on 08-03-200703:20 PM

To video editors: What's the best software video encoder?

I'm relatively new to the encoding world, outside of .m2v for DVD. I have a Mac Pro Dual Quad-Core 2.4 Ghz Intel Xeon system with 14 GB of RAM and running OS X 10.7.2. I have the latest version of Final Cut Studio, which includes Final Cut Pro 7 and Compressor. I also have Adobe Media Encoder, but upon testing, I was (ironically) flabbergasted by the fact that Adobe's encoding software doesn't come with support for .avi output. For that reason, it's difficult to trust it. I love what Compressor has to offer, and its encoding quality is more than satisfactory for any and all Mac-based file types, but obviously, the format limitations outside of the Apple realm present a problem in terms of the variety I can offer a client. I would like to have the flexibility of .flv, .wmv, .avi, etc.
Again, I love the QuickTime options of Compressor. I have read that Flip4Mac has add-ons for the formats which I listed above, but I've never used that software for this kind of workflow. I also have some experience with Sorenson Squeeze, but that was mainly on an Avid platform, and there were various frame size/crop issues with encoding which forced me as a user to jump through MANY hoops (none of those hoops are an issue in Compressor, but, again, file types are limited) in order to achieve my encoding goals. However, Sorenson does offer support for every imaginable file type in its $599 Pro edition of the software. I'd rather not spend that much just for an encoder if unnecessary, but I honestly have no real frame of reference in terms of cost-to-"output variety" ratio.
So, to the many who are much more educated and experienced than I am, I ask, in your opinion as professionals...what's the best software encoder? Is it one of the three I have already mentioned, or is it another software with which I am not yet familiar? I am open to any and all suggestions and opinions. At this point, I am mostly dealing with web delivery, whether it be streaming or downloadable file types, and DVD/Blu-Ray encoding for disc burn. However, as I'm sure you understand, you never know what kind of project will come your way, or what kind of file type and/or size a client will require on any given day. I'm really just trying to get an education on encoding in general so I can stay somewhat ahead of the curve, and be able to deliver as many different file types as possible so I never have to tell a client, "No, I can't do that."
Thoughts?

Sorry that you are not getting help.
I would have said that there are some excellent people I see that hang out in the forums for Final Cut etc that would.
I look more at hardware aspect and had you asked I would have recommend against the 2.4GHz in favor of 6-core 3.33 or 2.93 or something. Giving up GHz for more cores or something never works out.
Then I would have stayed with 10.6.8 (maybe keep Lion handy for testing only).
Setup a good storage subsystem, 6 x 4GB (or 3 x 8GB when using single cpu).
A good place to start is over on www.macperformanceguide.com for setup hardware and testing.
http://barefeats.com/macs11_01.html
Handbrake
http://www.barefeats.com/wst10c3.html
http://macperformanceguide.com/Optimizing-Handbrake.html
http://macperformanceguide.com/Reviews-MacProWestmere-Handbrake.html
Why you want more RAM
http://macperformanceguide.com/Reviews-MacProWestmere-AfterEffects.html
http://macperformanceguide.com/Reviews-MacProWestmere-Memory.html

Whats the diffrent between "let x = bind y" and "x: bind y"

Seit gegrüsst
What is the diffrent between "let x = bind y" and "x: bind y"
for example:
theViewPort = Group {
              let width = bind theWidth
              let height = bind theHeight
              content: [
                  theTitle
theViewPort = Group {
             width: bind theWidth
              height: bind theHeight
              content: [
                  theTitle
          }both will compile, but what is the recommended way to do this?
carpe noctem
livevil}
Edited by: livevil on Oct 16, 2008 5:27 AM
Edited by: livevil on Oct 16, 2008 5:29 AM

theViewPort = Group {
let width = bind theWidth
let height = bind theHeight
content: [
theTitle
}"let", which is now "def", defines a variable that is valid within the scope of the object literal. It has no effect on the instance variables of the Group object.
The second piece of code would initialize the width and height instance variables of the Group object, except that they don't exist!

What is the size of capture window for MX440-VTD8X?

I am trying to figure out how best to resize video I have captured with my MX440-VTD8X. For the application I am using (AVISynth) I need to calculate the PAR (Pixel Aspect Ratio), for this I need to know the size of the capture window for my video capture card.
I think that this card uses a Philps SAA-7114H, although I cannot be certain as MSI don't seem to publish this fact anywhere. (I found a few references to the 7114 via Google so that is the best lead I have had so far).
Anyway, even if I knew it used a 7114H that doesn't much help as I can't find any published data that tells me what the capture window (in microseconds) is for this card. The WDM driver might modify the window so how, so I can't just look it up in the datasheet for the 7114H.
I am looking for figures for the capture window for both PAL and NTSC,
could someone please help?
many thanks,
Kevin

To quote from the article I have been using which gives step-by-step instructions on how to calculate to aspect ratio ..
(Pixel Aspect Ratio, Source Aspect Ratio and Target Aspect Ratio)
"To determine your source PAR, you first have to know what the aspect ratio of the capture window of your capture device is. This capture window is fixed, but again it is rarely exactly 4:3. The device always digitizes the same area of your video and resizes it to the size you set in your capture application. The raw captured height is always 480 lines for NTSC and 576 for PAL. The width of the capture window has to be determined. A table with known values (and a more elaborate explanation) can be found in section 5.4. A method for determining this value yourself can be found in chapter 11.
Once you know the capture window width, the Image Aspect Ratio of your device can be calculated as:
PAL IAR = (4 / 3) * ([window width in µs] / 52.0 µs) / (576/576)
NTSC IAR = (4 / 3) * ([window width in µs] / 52.6555 µs) / (480/486) "
The 'window width' is given for some capture cards in the guide, but unfortunately not the MSI one I am using, and the 'window width' does vary from one type of capture card to another.
Without this information I am at a brick wall. There is a method to determine the window by using a PAL DVD player as the source video, playing some test image, the problem is that I only have an NTSC DVD player so I can't use that technique,
this is something that the manufacturer must know, but unfortunately they rarely publish it,
Kevin

What is the diffrent to encode in pal or ntsc?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for