What is the maximum number of line items we can enter in an order...

Hi,
Can anyone explain what is the max number of line items that v can enter in an order....
or if i want to increase the number of line items than the max where it is controlled.
Because my mm counter part is facing this in the PO he could make only 9999,the problem is when posting...the accounting document is not getting generated bcas of exceeding the limit.
venugopal

hi,
this is my personal experiance that we can enter at the most 499 line items in SALES ORDER.
This is because for every line item there will be 2 financial entries, debit and credit. and 1 FI document can have at the most 999 line items (which we can not increase without KEY fromSAP)
If we divide 999 by 2 then it comes to 499.50 so you can enter at the most 499 line items in Sales order.
Regards
Vishal

Similar Messages

What's the maximum number of Apple TVs that can be displayed in the AirPlay list?

We have 50 conference rooms all on the same network and are considering equiping each one with an Apple TV for AirPlay Mirroring our iPad 2s to the rooms projector, or TV. What is the maximum number of Apple TVs that can be displayed in the AirPlay menu to select the correct Apple TV for the conference room being used?

From what you're saying it sounds as though you wouldn't want to Airplay to all AppleTVs at once, just identify them when that specific room in use?
This is one of those uncharted territories wheer most domestic users will not require such a set up - Apple provide no official info about this, but they'd be your best source to ask.
AC

What is the maximum number of physical link we can bind to a ether-channel and port-channel

Hi,
I was studying about port-channel & ether-channel and found that, it can be bind up-to 8 ports. So maximum number, we can have of 8 ports or more ?
For binding we should have minimum of 2 ports or 1 ports will work ? For load-balancing purpose, is the port no. would be in a bundle of 2,4 and 8 ?
Thanks

Hi Kathik,
I have gone through one document. It's saying the below mentioned things :
Jun 7, 2012 9:36 PM (in response to Sarabjit)
Re: What is the maximum number of etherchannels we can have?
The maximum number of Etherchannels varies from platform to platform. The maximum number of ports in an etherchannel is either 8 ro 16 depending on the platform. The minimum number of ports in an etherchannel bundle is 1.
Jun 8, 2012 1:27 AM (in response to Sarabjit)
Re: What is the maximum number of etherchannels we can have?
Etherchannels is a Cisco term. Other vendors call them 802.3ad trunks. It's common to see something like this in datasheets:
48 ports 10/100/1000 Mbit/s
802.3ad:
Maximum of 32 groups
Maximum of 8 ports per group
The document url is https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/43680
The another document says the below mentioned things :
Matrix of Load Balancing Methods
This matrix consolidates the load balancing methods that this document describes:
Platform
Address Used in XOR
Source-Based?
Destination-Based?
Source-Destination-Based?
Load Balancing Method—Configurable/Fixed?
6500/6000
Layer 2, Layer 3 addresses, Layer 4 information, or MPLS information2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Configurable
5500/5000
Layer 2 address only
Yes
Cannot change the method
4500/4000
Layer 2, Layer 3 addresses, or Layer 4 information
Yes
Yes
Yes
Configurable
2900XL/3500XL
Layer 2 address only
Yes
Yes
Configurable
3750/3560
Layer 2 or Layer 3 address only
Yes
Yes
Yes
Configurable
2950/2955/3550
Layer 2 address only1
Yes
Yes
—1
Configurable
1900/2820
These platforms use a special method of load balancing. See theCatalyst 1900/2820 section for details.
8500
Layer 3 address only
Yes
Cannot change the method
1 For the 3550 series switch, when source-MAC address forwarding is used, load distribution based on the source and destination IP address is also enabled for routed IP traffic. All routed IP traffic chooses a port based on the source and destination IP address.
2 For the 6500 series switches that run Cisco IOS, MPLS layer 2 information can also be used for load balancing MPLS packets.
The document url is http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/etherchannel/12023-4.html
Another document says the below mentioned things for load-balancing :
inally, here is full list of valid load-distribution methods:
•dst-ip—Load distribution on the destination IP address
•dst-mac—Load distribution on the destination MAC address
•dst-port—Load distribution on the destination TCP/UDP port
•src-dst-ip—Load distribution on the source XOR destination IP address
•src-dst-mac—Load distribution on the source XOR destination MAC address
•src-dst-port—Load distribution on the source XOR destination TCP/UDP port
•src-ip—Load distribution on the source IP address
•src-mac—Load distribution on the source MAC address
•src-port—Load distribution on the source port
The document url is https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/63064
Please suggest.

What is the maximum number of lines per PO?

Are their line limitations per PO? I'm trying to find out if there is a max number of lines you can have on a given PO.
I assume performance starts to get effected at some point, but at what point might that be? 100 lines, 1000, 5000? We are looking at creating some standard PO's with 500+ lines on them, so we can create ASN against them via iSupplier.
If you know or have any experience dealing with large PO's please fill me in.
Thanks,
Jeremy

Hello,
We used to have an interface who imported standard PO, with a contract number as PO number, then the number of lines was increasing. We had a first problem from 200 lines, we had to apply a patch, then the limit was about 900 lines. I made a few searches but this occurs 2 years ago and I'm not even able to find the SR or a patch number ...
But from a business point of view, it's obviously a bad idea to always have the same PO with a high number of lines (hard to match invoices, PO is never closed, etc.) , from this problem we choose to import PO with PO number generated from the BL number + an suffix (to avoid duplicates PO numbers)
Hope it helps a little,
Kind regards,
Xavier

What is the maximum number of matching entires that can be included in a filter ?

I have created a message filter for "junk".
I seem to have added one too many entries and now it does not filter any new "junk" entries.
I have deleted some of the new entries and added them again, only to find they are not filtered.

You may be right about CLI vs GUI differences...
Call me a geek - but I wanted to see what would happen when my system hit the limit. So I saved all open documents, used a loop to create 40 passwordless accounts, then set up a login item so that on login, FUS would be invoked to log in to the next sequential uid.
When I came back (some time later), the system was logged in to the 40th user, and with a few exceptions, things seemed to be working ok...
The most obvious problem was that SystemUIServer was crashed in most of the users. I'm not sure when that started, but at some point after so many logins, it wasn't possible to launch the SystemUIServer, meaning no FUS menu (among other things). Other programmes launched and worked ok, though a bit sluggish (I had 7 swap files at that point, where it is rare for me to have more than two). But "Terminal.app" worked fine, and FUS was possible via command line so that wasn't a big problem, and the few other accounts I switched over to check were in a similar state.
The "Accounts" pref pane seems to be limited to showing 42 accounts (I had several accounts prior to creating the 40 test accounts), but the FUS menu (viewed from an account where SystemUIServer hadn't crashed) showed them all. I forgot to check the "Login Window".
Of course, there may be other things that don't work under these conditions that I didn't stumble across, but depending on whether or not SystemUIServer is required, and probably load and RAM availability, it looks like it is possible to squeeze at least 40 logins at once on a system.
And again, this obviously isn't "official" in any way.

What is the maximum number of user accounts that can be logged in at once?

How many users can be logged in at once, using Fast User Switching (FUS)?
Ideally, I'd like an "official" answer from Apple, or if someone can refer me to "official" Apple documentation that answers this question, that would be fine.
I think the answer is 10 but need to know for sure.
Thanks in advance!
Mac OS X (10.4.9)

You may be right about CLI vs GUI differences...
Call me a geek - but I wanted to see what would happen when my system hit the limit. So I saved all open documents, used a loop to create 40 passwordless accounts, then set up a login item so that on login, FUS would be invoked to log in to the next sequential uid.
When I came back (some time later), the system was logged in to the 40th user, and with a few exceptions, things seemed to be working ok...
The most obvious problem was that SystemUIServer was crashed in most of the users. I'm not sure when that started, but at some point after so many logins, it wasn't possible to launch the SystemUIServer, meaning no FUS menu (among other things). Other programmes launched and worked ok, though a bit sluggish (I had 7 swap files at that point, where it is rare for me to have more than two). But "Terminal.app" worked fine, and FUS was possible via command line so that wasn't a big problem, and the few other accounts I switched over to check were in a similar state.
The "Accounts" pref pane seems to be limited to showing 42 accounts (I had several accounts prior to creating the 40 test accounts), but the FUS menu (viewed from an account where SystemUIServer hadn't crashed) showed them all. I forgot to check the "Login Window".
Of course, there may be other things that don't work under these conditions that I didn't stumble across, but depending on whether or not SystemUIServer is required, and probably load and RAM availability, it looks like it is possible to squeeze at least 40 logins at once on a system.
And again, this obviously isn't "official" in any way.

What is the maximum number of files that Finder can display in a directory?

When displaying systems in an Active Directory domain, Finder only displays some of the systems.
I presume that Finder is treating the list of SMB/CIFS systems as if they were entries in a file directory. The number of systems that should appear in the list is around 10,000 but only about half of these are displayed in Finder.
Is there a way to increase the number of systems displayed in Finder?

Yes, I am working with a Windows Active Directory domain.
When using Finder>Network> to display systems in an Active Directory domain, it fails to display all of the systems. Is there a Finder limitation that causes this?
When the system was originally brought online, only the local systems that were members of the Active Directory domain were displayed. Over time, the number of systems that have been "discovered" has increased. The entries are maintained in ascending alphabetical order. Currently, only systems with names beginnig with A through M are listed.
This creates a bit of a problem for our Technical Publications group as all of the systems in our facility start with the letter T.
Does Finder have a limit on how many entries that it can display for a given directory?
Is the list of Active Directory systems being maintained in memory and, hence, limited by memory resources?
Is there a way to filter the list?

Maximum number of line items

Dear All,
I am facing an issue in the maximum number of line items EBP purchase order.
We are in SRM 4.0 using extended classic scenario.
In EBP PO, if the number of line items is more than 50 then we are getting the dump error "Field symbol has not yet been assigned" when we try to display the PO in Process purchase order transaction.
In process purchase order, if we click on the start after enting the PO number then it is giving the dump error. But we could able to display the PO by clicking on the details icon of the PO after searching with time frame.
Dump error is occuring only when we try open the PO header node to see the list of items of the PO. Until the PO is having 50 line items we dont have a problem. If the PO is having 51st item then we are getting the dump error.
Have anyone faced this issue? Please help me to resolve this.
Thanks.

Pradeep,
Dump error details:
What happened?
    Error in ABAP application program.
    The current ABAP program "SAPLBBP_PDH_SEARCH" had to be terminated because one
     of the
    statements could not be executed.
    This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
Error analysis
    You attempted to access an unassigned field symbol
    (data segment 32774).
    This error may occur for any of the following reasons:
    - You address a typed field symbol before it is set using ASSIGN
    - You address a field symbol that points to a line in an internal table
      that has been deleted
    - You address a field symbol that had previously been reset using
      UNASSIGN, or that pointed to a local field that no longer exists
    - You address a global function interface parameter, even
      though the relevant function module is not active,
      that is it is not in the list of active calls. You can get the list
      of active calls from the this short dump.
Information on where terminated
    The termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLBBP_PDH_SEARCH" in
     "SUB_LIST_GET".
    The main program was "SAPLBBP_PO_UI_ITS ".
    The termination occurred in line 191 of the source code of the (Include)
     program "LBBP_PDH_SEARCHF10"
    of the source code of program "LBBP_PDH_SEARCHF10" (when calling the editor
     1910).
Thanks.

Maximum number of line items in sales order

hi,
Is there a limit on the maximum number of line items that are permitted in a sales order?
Thanks,
Shailaja

Hi
I think the correct reply would be 999,999 because data type of item number POSNR is NUM 6, which means that it can hold upto value 999,999.
However, at the same time keep the following into consideration:
1. FI document has a restriction of 999 line items per document. So, depending on the account settings, there will be a lower limit. E.g. if each Sales order line item results in 2 line items in the accounting document, then the max. no. of SO line items is limited to 499.
2. If FI summarization is active, then the system summarizes the account postings, thus reducing the no. of FI line items. Hence, a SO can accomodate more than 999 line items. However, this means that certain line item level details will not be available to the Finance guys (which they may not like).
3. As the number of line items in a Sales order increases, the system performance suffers greatly. There are performance fixes available, but in general, it is painful to load a SO with large no. of line times through BDC's. 10 Sales orders with 100 lines each consume less system resources than 1 Sales order with 1000 lines.

What is the maximum number of text characters

Probably has been asked before, but what is the maximum number of text characters that can be used in a song title and still be burned to a disk. TIA

Are the files tucked away in some deeply nested folder. I've not used Toast (being a PC) but my experience of other burning software suggests that it is usually designed to truncate the filenames to meet the specification of the format it is using. Also I believe "Red Book" is the audio standard so the output will simply be a number of audio tracks with the accompanying index. Filenames on the output end should be irrelevant, unless you've enabled CD Text which is not Red Book standard, and again Toast should enforce any field limits. Perhaps Toast is having trouble reading the files rather than a problem writing them. I assume the files are on an internal drive and you are not trying to burn DRM'd files.
Use a rewritable disc and clone a small audio file multiple times, giving them filenames of 40,45,50,55 etc. characters then try to burn them in a list of increasing length of filename - see which one Toast hangs on.
tt2

Maximum number of line items in PO/SA....

Hi,
1.
What is the limitation on maximum number of line items in a PO/schedulling agreement/Contract.
2.
Also what is the maximum permissible number of lines in a single accounting document possible.As far as I know there is a limitation of counter 999 meaning if an aaccounting document is generated after GR then it will only allow max 999 lines.
Is there any other way to avoid this.Because in my case I have for several line items in PO and several pricing conditions with separate GL account.Now when I do GR and if a PO has many line items with about 4 to 5 conditions then for each line item there would be minimum 6-7 entries.
How can this best be handled in SAP.
I was being adviced to split the GR but is there any better way or is there any option like summerised acounting document ?
Please suggest as this is most critical for me.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
manOO

Hi,
There is no limitation in PO. But if you want, you can use following user exit;
<b>EXIT_SAPMM06E_012</b>
With regard to Maximum Number of items: There is a limit of (999) line items which can be posted per FI document. This is because the line item number (BSEG-BUZEI) field length is defined as (3) numeric positions, i.e., (999) line items.
The most commonly used workarounds are as follows:
(1) Implement FI summarization (per note 36353).
(2) Cancel the original billing document and split it into smaller documents using different payment terms but actually with the same terms, in case of invoice verification.
This will avoid the (999) line item limit for FI postings. Please also have a look at the note 117708 and 77161.
Bye,
Muralidhara

Maximum number of line items in delivery

HI experts,
For open sales orders deliveries are created through VL10c in background job
what are maximum number of line items a delivery can have and How do I ristrict the Line items?
Thanks in Advance.

In standart there is not limit of quantity items in Delivery.
But you can make limit - see Note 103334.
SAP recomended 300 pos.

What is the maximum number of builds in Keynote version 6.2?

What is the maximum number of builds in Keynote version 6.2? If there are any...
I'm up to 800 builds and seems to be working great. I'd like to keep adding builds and want to know if anyone has stumbled across a limit and started to have issues.
Thanks!

Hi Wayne - you have been very helpful; thank you.
I work at a film / tv post production facility. We use Outlook365 and the Sharepoint feature to share Word Docs and Excel Spreadsheets virtually. I use the Excel functionality in Sharepoint so that we can track media we copy to our StorNext SAN volumes as well as the multiple LTFS and Tar Per Shot LTO5s we write for both our clients and as internal data backups. Managing the media is beyond critical as TV and Feature studios require the utmost care of their OCF (original camera footage) and dailies / editorial media.
Of the many toolsets we use to edit and color shows and feature films is the AutoDesk platform (think Flame, Inferno, Smoke). The application toolset writes over 20TBs of data to our SAN volumes and the way it writes the data is unique to the application. If you tried to look at via a Mac Finder or Windows Explorer, the hex values in the filenames would not make sense. We cannot associate those hex names with actual human readable project names.
One of my engineers used the AutoDesk app to spit out a 1 million line plus text file with human readable names of every project, file type and file path.
What I am trying to do is suck all of that data into a spreadsheet that I can upload to Sharepoint (or paste directly into Sharepoint). When I try to copy/paste on my Mac Mini directly into a Sharepoint page, both Safari and Firefox go into a spinning beach ball of death. Time stops; photons of light are bent towards the event horizon; you get the picture.
Since Numbers won't accept more than 65,000 lines, I need a way to get that data into a spreadsheet.
I have downloaded LibreOffice and will give that a try.
Knowing what you do now, might you have any other suggestions?
Thank you again.
Scott

What is the maximum number of characters in an Oracle 10G Instance Name

All,
Can I know what is the maximum number of characters in an oracle 10g instance name under AIX? Is it 7 characters or 8 characters?
regards
Santhosh

One should really make the difference between db_name and instance_name: if instance_name default value is db_name it can be different
(even on a non RAC database).
For example with Oracle 10.2.0.4 you can create a database named DB78 with instance_name=DB12345678:
$ uname -a
Linux lx01.localdomain 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Fri May 23 22:17:30 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
$ ps -fu oracle | grep smon
oracle    6353     1 0 20:30 ?        00:00:01 ora_smon_DB12345678
oracle    6412 5596 0 20:37 pts/1    00:00:00 grep smon
$ export ORACLE_SID=DB12345678
$ sqlplus / as sysdba
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 8 20:34:26 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> show parameter name
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_name_convert                 string
db_name                              string      DB78
db_unique_name                       string      DB78
global_names                         boolean     FALSE
instance_name                        string      DB12345678
lock_name_space                      string
log_file_name_convert                string
service_names                        string      DB78I would not recommend this practice: but it's interesting to know to avoid confusing between db_name and instance_name.

What is the maximum number of columns that can be displayed by sqlplus?

Hello,
Questions:
Is there a limit on what sqlplus can display?
What is the maximum number of columns that can be displayed by sqlplus?
I cannot find anything on this in my search. I checked the limits page:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14357/apa.htm#sthref3658
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16604/apa.htm#i635278
It does not specify any column limits; however, I'm thinking it is tied to LINESIZE which is system dependent.
Please confirm if true.
Thanks!

Received answer directly from SQL*Plus Development:
"sqlplus does not have a limit on the number of columns it displays."
They created a table with more than 256 columns with data and had no problem retrieving the data.

What is the maximum number of line items we can enter in an order...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for