What is the most reliable way to run one Windows accounting program in Osx 10.5.8?

I have a simple Windows application where I basically do my accounts. I do not want to tie up my Imacs resources with running a full Windows Os "emulation" like Paralells or VMware Fusion just to run a simple accounting program.
I have heard about apps that can run one windows application at the time through a kind of Osx Application which emulates windows some how. Is is true that this is a better way of running my accounting program? Is it reliable? What I do is to punch in invoices and print out reports basically. How much resources does this "consume" to run it in "one simple application mode" in comparison with for example Paralells?
And what is the term for running windows in "one simple application mode"?

I guess you could try the free trial of CrossOver. http://www.codeweavers.com/products/crossover/ You did not say what app you want to run so it is difficult for us to recommend crossover as being able to run the app.
But your question is that you are looking for the "most reliable" way to run a Windows program. In my opinion you need Parallels or Fusion. These run the real Windows OS so my thinking is it is the "most reliable" method of running a Windows app on an Apple computer, other than Boot Camp.
But you said you don't want Parallels. This is probably why you have not received any responses. You eliminated the most reliable and easiest method, in my opinion, when you initially posted. Parallels does not consume any resources until you start it up to use your app. You can close it after you are done with your app. Of course hard drive space is required for storing the OS, your app, and data. But you still need to store your app and data regardless of method you choose.
One more thing, Parallels and Fusion create a virtual machine for running Windows.
So my recommendation, use Parallels or Fusion.

Similar Messages

  • What is the most efficient way to run internet explorer on a mac?

    I have to use I.E. for school along with Outlook.  I run windows for mac and am looking for the cheapest and least invasive way to do so.

    CSS731 wrote:
    Specifically I cannot attach files such as students grades or send requests to our photocopy center.  I works great on a pc but won't work on a mac.  Most at my institution thumb their noses at macs and I have been told directly they will not support mac or OSX.  I have tried using firefox but have been told by my colleagues that IE is the only browser that works.
    What you are running into is unfortunately rather common in business, education, and government. What happened is that your school computerized their operations in the late 1990s to early 2000s, when Internet Explorer on Windows XP was the most common web browser. Websites were coded to take advantage of technologies that are unique to IE. Once all these institutions and businesses finished their work, they thought they were done and they moved on.
    But in the time since then, the world changed around them. The Web moved towards "standards compliance," which means writing web sites for the CSS3 and HTML5 standards. Not for old Microsoft-only Internet Explorer features. If a web site is standards compliant, it will work on any browser that is also standards compliant. That would include every popular browser today: Apple Safari, Mozilla Firefox, and Google Chrome. (As well as the latest Internet Explorer for Windows, which is much better than it used to be.)
    Standards compliance was a wonderful revolution, because it meant we could use any browser. It also paved the way for the iOS and Android mobile device boom, since they need to use mobile web browsers and those are not Internet Explorer.
    The big problem is that your institution, like many others in education, business, and government, either doesn't want to upgrade their systems or doesn't have the budget. The system they built in 1996 or 2002 is being maintained, but it isn't being modernized. Therefore, it is not standards compliant. That's why it doesn't work with Firefox or Safari.
    I am sure that both you and they have noticed that they have fallen behind, because it's very easy to show this. If you go to any modern web site...Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, Yahoo, Dropbox, every photo sharing site, every web forum, etc. it is extremely easy to upload attachments no matter what web browser you use.
    Of course, they'll get very defensive if you try to tell them that their systems are totally out of date and any browser should be able to upload attachments. Even if that's true, they may not be able to overhaul their systems any time soon. Maybe they would like to, but they can't get the funding. The problem for them is that more and more devices are being used on their network which don't have Internet Explorer, like Macs, phones, and tablets, and it's revealing the limitations of their system.
    That's the situation. It won't be easy to fix because it requires that the school's systems be modernized. But they really need to be modernized, because as we saw, attachments are no problem on multiple browsers on all the other web sites we use every day.
    If they could update their systems, the benefits would be significant. If their web site became standards compliant, it would automatically support smartphones, tablets, and Mac web browsers with probably very little extra work.

  • What is the most effective way to get my imac 2 ghz intel core duo 2 10.4.11 to be able to run 10.5 and sync with my iphone 4s?

    What is the most effective way to get my imac 2 ghz intel core duo 2 10.4.11 to be able to run 10.5 and sync with my iphone 4s?

    As your Mac should run Snow Leopard provided it has at least 1GB memory, that would be a good deal easier and very much cheaper than trying to find a 10.5 install disc.
    Snow Leopard costs $30 approx from the online Apple store (£26 if you're in UK)
    You'll need to update Tiger to 10.4.11 with the combo installer first (unless you're just erasing the disc and starting fresh) You can then update SL from 10.6.3 to 10.6.8 with its combo installer.
    For comparison, 10.5 Leopard is currently running about $130 from Apple (if still available) and more on Amazon etc.
    This info for Leopard courtesy of TexasMacMan;
    Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard installation system requirements
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TA24950
    Leopard is no longer available at the Apple Store but may be available by calling Apple Phone Sales @ 1-800-MY-APPLE (1-800-692-7753).
    If you can't obtain a retail install DVD from Apple, look on eBay or Google the installer part numbers to possibly find at an on-line store. Here's what to look for:
    MB427Z/A  Leopard 10.5.1 install DVD
    MB576Z/A  Leopard 10.5.4 install DVD
    MB021Z/A  Leopard 10.5.6 install DVD (single user)
    MB022Z/A  Leopard 10.5.6 install DVD (5-user family pack)
    Installing Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1544
    Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Installation and Setup Guide
    http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/leopard_install-setup.pdf
    After you install the base 10.5, download & install the 10.5.8 combo update at http://support.apple.com/downloads/Mac_OS_X_10_5_8_Combo_Update

  • What is the most efficient way to have full access to the front panel on RT Labview?

    I have a RT machine that needs to do its job and also port the front panel to an external machine over the network. What is the most efficient way to do it? Using as little of the RT time as possible but providing full functionality to the RT front panel.
    So far I have been using it directly from Labview - running the VI on a remote (RT) and have the front panel on local Labview (WINDOWS). I know I can do it with also through WWW (not very happy with that though).
    LV2009 SP1.
    Thanks

    Running a compiled executable on the RT target, rather than running it within the development environment, is probably slightly more efficient but limits you to the web interface.  If you're running within the LabVIEW environment, I doubt there's a noticeable difference in efficiency from the RT perspective between the web server and the LabVIEW front panel, although that's mostly a guess (I would expect the RT system to send identical data in each case, once the front panel is loaded).  Those are your only options in modern LabVIEW versions.  In LabVIEW 7.1 you could build an executable that acted as the front panel for an RT system, but that feature does not exist in recent versions.  However, a quick search turned up this document with code to approximately duplicate that behavior, perhaps it will work for you?

  • I have an ipod classic with 4gb, it is full. What is the most economical way to upgrade to at least 16gb

    I have an ipod classic with 4gb, it is full. What is the most economical way to upgrade to at least 16gb?
    (I don't want to delete anything)

    To recover the photos from an iPod Classic you'll need to use third-party software and the photos gained will be quite low resolution.
    See https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3991 for possibilities.

  • What is the most effective way to write Statement to catch and reverse errors during query excution?

    Hello my friends:
    I am wondering what is the most effective way to deal with errors, specifically in a
    Stored Procedure.
    I wrote something like this:
    BEGIN TRY
    BEGIN TRANSACTION
    /*My statements goes in here*/
    IF ERROR_NUMBER() = 0 -- Do I need this line?
    COMMIT TRANSACTION;
    END TRY
    BEGIN CATCH
    IF ERROR_NUMBER() > 0 --Do I need this line?
    ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
    END CATCH;
    It would make sense using the if Statement when attempting to log errors.
    Just too many variations.
    Thanks

    Also read this great article
    http://sqlblog.com/blogs/alexander_kuznetsov/archive/2009/05/13/your-try-block-may-fail-and-your-catch-block-may-be-bypassed.aspx
    Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
    http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
    MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
    MS SQL Consulting:
    Large scale of database and data cleansing
    Remote DBA Services:
    Improves MS SQL Database Performance
    SQL Server Integration Services:
    Business Intelligence

  • What is the most efficent way to create both a standard and HD DVD

    Hi,
    I'm just getting into HD video editing, and I have relatives who will be several years behind me. I will be making HD DVD's for myself to use, but I will also need to make standard DVD's to send to my relatives.I am assuming that the HD DVD's I create will not play in a standard DVD player. I may be wrong. However, If this is correct, is there a particular point in the process of working with Encore where I can make that choice, create the DVD, and then go back and alter it in order to create the other type without destroying and having to redo everything that was done up to that point?

    Thank you Hunt. Being ahead of most of the rest of the world and getting the best technology out there can be a pain sometimes. Reading through Jon Geddes' article left me scratching my head several times, and some of it went way over my head, but I'll keep at it, until it sinks in. Some language, terms, and shorthand, I'm sure are simple to understand to a lot of people, but I'm not in that catagory. I'll just keep working at it. 
    Terry Lee Martin
    Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:39:08 -0600
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: what is the most efficent way to create both a standard and HD DVD
    I would edit the Project in HD in PrPro. The BD authoring part will be straight workflow.
    For the SD DVD-Video, you have a few choices. You can Export to DV-AVI Type II for Import into a new Encore Project for the DVD. Some feel that PrPro does not do a good job at down-rezing from HD to SD. For a workflow that will likely yield better quality, see this http://www.precomposed.com/blog/2009/07/hd-to-sd-dvd-best-methods/. If you have PrPro/Encore CS4, then Jeff Bellune's /thread/487134?tstart=0 might be useful to you. Just follow the links to the tutorial.
    Good luck,
    Hunt
    >

  • What's the most efficient way to transfer to personal domain?

    I've been using the cumbersome .Mac address and have spent a lot of time optimizing the site, having also purchased a domain name (which I'll switch to), which is currently masked and forwarded. So what's the most smooth way of using the personal domain without losing all the strides I've made to get bumped up in the rankings? Thanks in advance for your suggestions. www.RedCottageInc.com (that's my future personal domain!)

    I'm saying that you give Google the .Mac URL to get to your sitemap but use the registered domain name for normal access.
    You are promoting your site with www.RedCottageInc.com but, because it is masked, Google needs your web.mac address to access the verification file and the sitemap so that it can spider your site.
    You normally upload your sitemap as "sitemap.xml". You can test its accessibility by entering
    http://web.mac.com/username/WebSiteName/Sitemap.xml in your browser.
    Google needs this URL to get to the sitemap - visitors will use www.RedCottageInc.com.
    Google wants to get to the verification file and the sitemap but your website visitors don't.
    I guess all this is confusing if you haven't done it before and I don't know that I am explaining it very well. The best way to get it is to go through all the steps of creating the verification file and sitemap, uploading them to your site folder and adding and verifying in your Google control panel.
    Here are the relevant Google pages...
    Guidelines...
    http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
    Add URL to Google...
    http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl
    Verification file....
    http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35658&query=html+f ile&topic=&type=
    Sitemap...
    http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34657&ctx=sibling

  • What's the most efficient way to serve a file from a servlet?

    I have a servlet that does various different things depending on the needs. Sometimes it dynamically generates content, and sometimes all it does is send a file out, with no alteration.
    What is the most efficient way to just send a file?
    One option:
    OutputStream os = response.getOutputStream();
    InputStream is = new FileInputStream(...)
    (send all the bytes from is to os, the regular way using a buffer)Another option is to say:
    RequestDispatcher rd = response.getRequestDispatcher(fileName);
    rd.forward();Any other options? What's the prefered way of doing this?
    I know the rule of "don't optimize too early" but this is a situation where we need to get the maximum amount of files served with the hardware we have, and it's going to be a lot of static files, so efficiency is important.
    Thanks

    Ok, that's what I thought. It would be nice if there were a "response.sendStream(InputStream input)" method in the ServletResponse class. Even nicer would be a sendFile or sendChannel or something. This is probably a common usage and it's a place where the container has many opportunities for optimization. For example, it could call the operating systems send_file kernel call so the entire transfer would be done directly from the disk controller to the ether card (on systems that support that).
    For now I'll just do my own buffered copy.

  • I am giving my old MacBook Air to my granddaughter.  What is the most efficient way to erase all the data on it?

    I am giving my old MacBook Air to my granddaughter.  What is the most efficient way to erase the data?

    You have two options.....
    One is to do a clean reinstall of your OS - if you still have the USB installer that came with your Macbook Air...
    The second option is to create a new user (your granddaugher's name).....Deauthorize your Macbook Air from your Itunes and Appstore.....
    Restart your Macbook after you've created your granddaughter's user name, login under your granddaughter's username and delete your username.
    Search your Macbook for your old files and delete them.....
    Good luck...

  • What is the most efficient way to convert a static site to a responsive site using Dreamweaver?

    I need to convert an old site made in Dreamweaver to be responsive to any monitor size. What is the most efficient way to do this?

    Depending on what you have to work with and how it was coded, it might be doable and then again not.  Suffice it to say, there are no magic buttons that will do this for you. Also consider that mobile & tablet users interact differently with their web devices. So your navigation & forms must be finger friendly.  Also images & content must make mobile users happy without killing their dataplans.  There's a lot of planning that goes into making a good Responsive Web site.
    Nancy O.

  • What is the most efficient way to turn an array of 16 bit unsigned integers into an ASCII string such that...?

    What is the most efficient way to turn a one dimensional array of 16 bit unsigned integers into an ASCII string such that the low byte of the integer is first, then the high byte, then two bytes of hex "00" (that is to say, two null characters in a row)?
    My method seems somewhat ad hoc. I take the number, split it, then interleave it with 2 arrays of 4095 bytes. Easy enough, but it depends on all of these files being exactly 16380 bytes, which theoretically they should be.
    The size of the array is known. However, if it were not, what would be the best method?
    (And yes, I am trying to read in a file format from another program)

    My method:
    Attachments:
    word_array_to_weird_string.vi ‏18 KB

  • What is the most efficient way to post several stories to multiple html pages

    What is the most efficient way to post five stories to multiple html pages?
    Currently they are all html files saved in DW with some divs sharing content and other divs are unique.
    I've experimented with saving stories as library items and dropping into other html but wondered if there is a more efficient or dynamic process.

    Server-Side Includes.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/2112460#2112460
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists
    http://alt-web.com/
    http://twitter.com/altweb

  • Moving content from iMovie to iMovie - what's the most efficient way?

    If I edit and create movies in iMovie08 on one iMac and I want to transfer the content to iMovie08 another iMac 200 miles away , what's the most efficient way? I prefer not to burn DVDs, because I want to do further work on the movies on the second iMac's iMovie (so I can share them with iTunes and sync them with Apple TV).

    >PDPageAddCosContents(destPage, PDPageGetCosContents(srcPage));
    Does this method (PDPageGetCosContent) exist? It would be easy enough
    to create, but I don't see it in the document.
    More seriously, I have a vague memory that it is a Really Bad Thing to
    share the same Contents objects between multiple pages. Maybe
    something to do with page deletion, can't remember.
    >PDPageAddCosResource(destPage, PDPageGetCosResources(srcPage));
    These two methods are not symmetric, and PDPageAddCosResource doesn't
    work that way, sadly...
    Aandi Inston

  • What is the most sensible way to extend a wifi signal. I am in a cinderblock house and I have to buy something that will give me a single network but added range from my airport extreme base station.

    What is the most sensible way to extend a wifi signal. I am in a cinderblock house and I have to buy something that will give me a single network but added range from my airport extreme base station.

    Use an Airport Express. Configure the AEBS to allow it's wireless network to be extended. This is a dropdown menu option under the Wireless tab. Configure the Airport Express to Extend an Existing Network also under it's Wireless tab. You will need to provide the name of your network used in the AEBS as well as the network's access password.

Maybe you are looking for