What's the best Mac for running Final Cut Pro X?

Title says it all. What's the best Mac for running Final Cut Pro X? I'm not looking to make a feature length hollywood film. But I'd like to be able to edit video without lag.

Yes. Begin with the fastest processor / graphics card / and as much RAM as you can afford. (As all three will become obsolete over time.)
I started from scratch. I have a 27-inch iMac with a 3.4 G Intel Core i7. (currently the fastest processor for an iMac) I also ordered the best graphics card--AMD Ratheon HD. I ordered 16G of RAM, but recently added more RAM to equal 24G. (OWC makes good after-market RAM for iMACs.)
Last, I ordered a flash drive / SATA hard drive combo.  (250G on flash / ITB on SATA). The OS and all of my applications run off the flash drive. (for fast start up!)
I put all of my media and FCP projects onto the SATA hard drive.
Now, I had the option to order a 2TB SATA. But, I realized I can always buy more external storage as I edit more and more projects. ALSO! FCPX is GREAT when it comes to editing projects on external drives! I can segregate an entire project and its media files onto a removeable drive. I simply launch FCPX, plug in the drive and--poof!--I'm ready to edit. It sees the project and the media right away. When I'm done editing, I can then send this drive to another editor (also using FCPX) or attach it to my MacBook if I want to edit the same project in the field.
This has worked for me. I wish you luck.

Similar Messages

  • What si the best way to export Final Cut Pro X movies to YouTube?

    Hi
    The Share > YouTube tool is proving to be very unrelaible. Often the Share Loader comes back with the "Your password has been rejected" message when I know that the password is correct. It seems to work fine for 50% of the time but it's really frustrating.
    My videos are quite large (given that they are all under two minutes they have been shot in HD and are often over 1Gb - too big for YouTube).
    What is the best way of getting my movies down in size and then uploaded to YouTube?
    Thanks
    Stephen

    Thanks for the advice guys. I'm just rather reluctant to spend more money when FCP is meant to be good at this kind of thing. It's frsutrating thet the YouTube option doesn't work, but it clearly doesn't.
    I think I just need to stop being a scrooge and to buy compressor!
    Cheers
    Stephen

  • What are the best options for running windows on a Mac Pro

    what are the best options for running windows on a Mac Pro

    For gaming and other CPU intensive stuff: Boot Camp – https://www.apple.com/support/bootcamp/
    For the rest: any virtualization software (Parallels/Vmware Fusion/VirtualBox)

  • What's the best Mac to run Logic Pro 9 and above with no issues

    What's the best Mac to run Logic Pro 9 and above with no issues?

    Any Mac that can happily run OS X Snow Leopard 10.6.8 and Logic Pro 9.1.5.....
    Note: Newer Macs cannot run Snow Leopard because SL doesn't provide hardware support for the newer hardware found in these newer Macs....
    Next best combo for newer Macs is Mavericks 10.9.5 and Logic Pro 9.1.8... but it is nowhere near as efficient a combo as the previous one mentioned...

  • What is the best Mac for gaming?

    Ok so as the title says, I was wondering what is the best Mac for gaming, I would like to play at least some old games which I have laying around the house when I'm at the airport or whatever. I read that macs are not that good at gaming but they do work at some degree :P
    Also I was wondering, me and my friend were arguing why is a Mac not considered a PC. I my arguments where that a PC means it has all that nasty, heavy, big hardware, with all the cards and stuff and that a mac just has the slick monitor with some stuff in it :P and a keyboard/mouse. His arguments were that even if macs only have the stuff mentioned above, it should still be considered a PC since it is afterall a Personal Computer.
    Thanks a lot and hopefully you'll settle my argument and aswear my question.

    Best computer for gaming is always the one with the highest specs. But generally speaking, a base macbook does ok. The major piece you need to increase FPS on a mac is a video card though, so generally the Pros or iMacs will be a better choice.
    Your friend is right, PC = Personal Computer. Mac's run the exact same hardware as a PC, just run different OS's. But its a term that got misplaced with windows in the flame wars of every forum post. P.S. Mac pros are a tower with no screen, just like the traditional windows ones.

  • What is the best mac for me? (budget: 1299$)

    What is the best mac for me? I will use it for:
    - Game programming and development
    - School research
    - Word proccessing
    - Presentations
    - Programming in Java
    - Programming in C++
    - Programming Iphone games and Objective-C
    - Gaming
    So can you tell me as fast as you can, my budget is 1299$

    FYI:  Macs are not gaming machines. 
    PERSONAL OPINION:  Nothing beats Microsoft (PCs) and/or Sony when it comes to gaming.  Macs can play games.  However, if you are a gamer, get a PC.

  • I loss the serial number for my Final Cut Pro. I just traid instaling before that upgrade my Mac G5 2004 Computer. Could anybody help me?.

    I loss the serial number for my Final Cut Pro. I just traid instaling before that upgrade my Mac G5 2004 Computer. Could anybody help me?.

    These are user forums. You are not speaking to Apple here. You may contact them:
    Apple Store Customer Service at 1-800-676-2775 or visit online Help for more information.
    To contact product and tech support visit online support site.

  • What is the best solution for running windows based programs

    I have one program that I need windows for.  What is the best solution for doing this without painfully slowing down my mac.

    Depends on your needs.
    BootCamp requires reboot and uses all physical resources of the system.  Only OSX *or* Windows can run.  Better for gaming or memory intensive tasks.  BootCampAssistant must set up the boot sector to make it work.  Also BCA required to remove it.
    VM (virtual machine) like Parallels which "hosts" Windows while still running OSX.  You split RAM between the two environments.  VM is just another program so no special boot sector changes needed, but not good for graphics or RAM intensive programs.
    Other recommended alternates to Parallels (paid) are VM Fusion (paid) and VirtualBox (free download from Oracle.com).

  • What is the best site for selling a MacBook Pro

    What's the best site to sell a MacBook Pro?

    eden79,
    how would you define “best” in this context?

  • What's the best Mac for Photoshop?

    I daily work on layered photoshop files, up to 10 (ten) GB. I currently have a G5 with 8 gb of ram. I finally can afford to upgrade to a faster computer and need to figure out if the 8core 2.93GHZ at $5,899 is the best buy for me. The 8 core 2.26GHZ is $3299. For an additional $2500 I would need to know that I will get at least 15% increase in speed. I remember back in the day when I picked out the fastest g5, when I later compared it to a slower G5, the difference in speed was barely noticeable, and when I upgraded to 8GB of RAM I discovered that photoshop could only take advantage of 2 GB.
    Does photoshop benefit from 8core vs 4 core?
    Will an 8 core 2.26ghz be faster than a 4 core 2.93GHZ when working in photoshop?
    Is there something new coming out, so I would benefit from waiting with my purchase?

    I work on big files, tho not that big.
    For many of the time-critical things I do in Photoshop seem to be single-processor, so even tho I have an 8-core machine, often only one is being used. This includes things like flatening and saving. So I am not sure that (unless you have other programs running) you would ever see an advantage to more than 4 cores.
    What I do notice when I work with big files, is that I keep a copy of Activity Monitor open, and whenever the green sector in memory goes to zero, my computer becomes unusably slow, and I usually reboot. I don't understand memory managment on the Mac, but whatever "inactive" means, it really means "swap yourself to death". So I have 14GB of RAM on my computer, and I usually don't run out even when dealing with big files. But I know that 8GB would not have been enough. Photoshop may not use more than 2GB, but it and the OS can cache materials and when those caches get too big, my computer comes to a halt. With your files, you may find 32GB to be useful.
    What I have done is to burn a CD or DVD with one big psd/psb file and walk down to my local Apple Store. The machines there don't have much RAM, but you can get some feeling for 4 cores vs. 8 cores. Reboot them before you do anything.
    One thing I would strongly recommend you do not try is what I did with my old G5--install a RAID. It only increased opportunities for losing files, and while it certainly sped up many file operations, I don't think any Photoshop operations were affected at all.
    A

  • What is the best practice for running a long report/query against an active database?

    We are using SQL Server 2012 EE but currently do not have the option to run queries on a R/O mirror though that is my long term goal. I am concerned I may still run into the below issue in that scenario as well since the mirror would also be updating data I
    am querying.
    I have a view that joins across several tables from two databases and is used by an invoicing program on existing data. Three of these tables are also actively updated by ongoing transactions. Running a report that used this view did not use to be a problem
    but now our database is getting larger and we have run into some timeout problems for the live transactions coming in.
    First the report query was timing out so I set command timeout to 0 and reran the query which pegged all 4 CPUs 100% for 90 minutes and so I finally killed it. Strangely there were no problems with active transactions during that time so I'm wondering if the
    query was really running doing anything useful or somehow spinning and waiting. I reviewed the view and found a field I was joining on that was not indexed so created an index on that field, reran the report, which then finished in three minutes and all the
    CPUs were busy but not at all pegged out. Same data queried both times. I figured problem solved. Of course later, my boss ran a similar invoice report, with the same amount of data, and our live transactions started timing out 100% while his query was running.
    I did not get a chance to see the CPU usage during that time.
    I looked at the execution plan of the underlying view and added the suggested index but that did not help. When I run the just the view at SQL Server it does not seem to cause any problems and finished in a couple seconds. Perhaps something else going on in
    the reporting tool using the view.
    My main question is - Given I have to use the live and active database, what is the proper way to run a long R/O query/report so that active transactions can still continue to update
    tables that I am querying? sp_who2 did show transactions being blocked so I guess a long query accessing the tables blocks live transactions accessing those same tables, but certainly I'm not the only one doing this. I
    am considering adding "with (nolock)" but am hoping there is a better standard practice as that clause can return dirty data and I understand why. Thx, Dave
    Thanks, Dave
    Dave

    Hello
    You can change the DB isolation level to Read uncommitted
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms378149(v=sql.110).aspx
    or use WITH (NOLOCK)
    I do use NOLOCK option for the dirty reads to avoid locks on the tables
    Javier Villegas |
    @javier_vill | http://sql-javier-villegas.blogspot.com/
    Please click "Propose As Answer" if a post solves your problem or "Vote As Helpful" if a post has been useful to you

  • What's the best Mac for editing HD video

    I have a 2009 2.66 quad core Power Mac with the RAM maxed out at 16Gb, 1066MHZ DDR3.  The OS is 10.6.8.  I edit using FC 7 pro.   I am editing HD footage from a Canon Vixia HF G10, which uses AVCHD on the camera and imports files to the computer as Apple ProRes 422 1440 x1080.  What I am finding is that final export times of rendered projects take very long.  As an example, a hour and a half edited and rendered timeline takes  8+ hours to export as a QuickTime file using the "current" settings option.  To export directly from FC to a DVD with the same circumstances takes 15+ hours.  I understand that HD has much more data but what can I do to speed this process up?
    Thanks

    Sorry, shabak.  I deleted my previous post because I had addressed it to BDAqua in error.
    Here we go again:
    You are posting in the Power Mac forum, your post says Power Mac and so does your signature; buy you do NOT have a "Power Mac" nor a "G5".  Clearly you have a Mac Intel machine (Mac Pro) or you couldn't run Snow Leopard 10.6.x on your machine.
    The aluminum case of the Mac Pro looks a bit like the G5, except the Mac Pro has two optical drive trays in front, while the G5 has only one.
    All Power Macs, including the G5, have Power Mac PPC CPUs, not Intel chips.  The last Power Mac ever was built almost seven years ago, in August of 2006,
    In short, if it's a G5 it cannot run 64-bit applications nor can it run Lion or Mountain Lion OS systems.
    Don't worry, this mistake is made often by some.  No big deal.
    You definitely want to wait for the announced Mac Pro, just hope it does materialize some day.

  • What's the best Mac for  just photoshop ?

    I need to upgrade my last edition PPC tower mac - photoshop is what I use most - and with a view to future-proofing what would be the best of the current crop of mac to get?
    Assuming that Photoshop becomes able to use more cores/threads in vCS6 or vCS7

    It is still MHz and RAM, and after that some good hard drives.
    So if you look around you'll see the 3.33GHz/6-core as most popular.
    Then 3 x 8GB if you can.
    Worry about CS5 and 64-bit drivers and funky graphic drivers, immature OpenCL and issues in OpenGL for now.
    http://macperformanceguide.com/OptimizingPhotoshop-Configuration.html
    http://macperformanceguide.com/blog/2010/20100630_PhotoshopOpenGL--photoshop.htm l

  • What is the best UI for running reports?

    Based on my experience,  am I correct in assuming the Silverlight UI is still the only one supported for running reports?
    Running reports in the html5 UI is not a comparable experience at all.... yet .
    Which UI do you use for your implementation?

    I agree 100%... HTML5 UI for Reports is very clunky, slower and not intuitive when Silverlight's is much better.
    We actually use the Excel Add-In a lot now, we just build the report's shell in C4C quickly and then do our View/Selection customization in Excel. We find it quite fast and everyone knows how to play with Excel reports quickly.
    Since 1402 I believe, the user-experience in the iPad app SAP Customer Insight is also much better with the introduction of dashboards in HTML5 though.
    JB.

  • 4K footage to DVD: what are the best settings for exporting in Premiere Pro CC v7.2.2?

    Hello everyone!
    I am editing a big bunch of short 4K clips (XAVC in MP4) which will then go onto DVDs. The idea is to get as many of those clips on a DVD as possible. Using Premiere Pro 7.2.2 on Windows 8.
    What I would like to know is whether I'm actually using the best possible settings for this case, because the video exported to MPEG2-DVD doesn't look that good. Or maybe it needs to be exported to a different format and rather converted to DVD format after?
    The sequence setting are the following:
    RED Cinema
    Frame rate: 29,97 fps
    3840x2160 (16:9)
    Square pixels
    The export settings I've been using:
    MPEG2-DVD
    Aspect  ratio: 16:9
    TV Format: PAL
    Field order: progressive
    Frame rate: 25
    Video quality: 100
    Bitrate: VBR
    1, I've tried different bitrates, also setting minimum at 9, but this blows up the file size too much (as i mentioned, the idea is to get at many clips as possible on a DVD)
    GOP: M - 3, N - 15 (haven't touched those)
    Multiplexer: none (should i put DVD?)
    I'm using maximum render quality
    Have I given all the information?
    Any help will be appreciated!@

    As Ann has advised do not expect too much, you are going down a lot in quality.
    Why are you also going from NTSC to a PAL output?
    Premiere will drop frames to get from 29.97 to  25.
    PAL DVD players read NTSC discs fine as long as they are region 0
    Why are you trying to produce a DVD anyway?
    A Bluray would be far better quality.
    Also a minimum 9 is way wrong, c9.6 is the max in the spec and hence avoided as your system is trying to push the spec limits to close.
    I used to use 6 - 7.5 - 8.8 in my VBR and they looked fine, now I am all HD.

Maybe you are looking for