What's the maximum number of bookmarks the Library can hold?

I want to bring all my bookmarks together into one place, preferably the Firefox Library function. Will it hold 3,000? 5,000? With those quantities, will it still retrieve them quickly? Any problems with this many bookmarks? Thanks to all.

I find that with many bookmarks, the bookmarks folder slows, especially when I (a) enter a new bookmark and then (b) move it to the appropriate location. At that stage, the bookmarks folder tends to freeze, I have to close it and re-open for the next 'bookmarking'

Similar Messages

What's the maximum number of Apple TVs that can be displayed in the AirPlay list?

We have 50 conference rooms all on the same network and are considering equiping each one with an Apple TV for AirPlay Mirroring our iPad 2s to the rooms projector, or TV. What is the maximum number of Apple TVs that can be displayed in the AirPlay menu to select the correct Apple TV for the conference room being used?

From what you're saying it sounds as though you wouldn't want to Airplay to all AppleTVs at once, just identify them when that specific room in use?
This is one of those uncharted territories wheer most domestic users will not require such a set up - Apple provide no official info about this, but they'd be your best source to ask.
AC

The maximum number of data files that can be accessed on the ORACLE DB is r

Hello Gurus,
We are facing problem in our BW production server
The maximum number of data files that can be accessed on the ORACLE DB is reached
Error Message :
ORA-00059: maximum number of DB_FILES exceeded
We have search a SAP Note regarding this error but this is for oracle - 8i, we want to solve this problem in Oracle - 10g
Thanks & Regards
Shishir
Vital Information
Database - ORACLE - 10.2.0.2.0
O/S - AIX - 5.3
SAP - BIW ( 700 )

Hi,
check Data transfer from one BW system to another
regards,
kaushal

What is the maximum number of physical link we can bind to a ether-channel and port-channel

Hi,
I was studying about port-channel & ether-channel and found that, it can be bind up-to 8 ports. So maximum number, we can have of 8 ports or more ?
For binding we should have minimum of 2 ports or 1 ports will work ? For load-balancing purpose, is the port no. would be in a bundle of 2,4 and 8 ?
Thanks

Hi Kathik,
I have gone through one document. It's saying the below mentioned things :
Jun 7, 2012 9:36 PM (in response to Sarabjit)
Re: What is the maximum number of etherchannels we can have?
The maximum number of Etherchannels varies from platform to platform. The maximum number of ports in an etherchannel is either 8 ro 16 depending on the platform. The minimum number of ports in an etherchannel bundle is 1.
Jun 8, 2012 1:27 AM (in response to Sarabjit)
Re: What is the maximum number of etherchannels we can have?
Etherchannels is a Cisco term. Other vendors call them 802.3ad trunks. It's common to see something like this in datasheets:
48 ports 10/100/1000 Mbit/s
802.3ad:
Maximum of 32 groups
Maximum of 8 ports per group
The document url is https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/43680
The another document says the below mentioned things :
Matrix of Load Balancing Methods
This matrix consolidates the load balancing methods that this document describes:
Platform
Address Used in XOR
Source-Based?
Destination-Based?
Source-Destination-Based?
Load Balancing Method—Configurable/Fixed?
6500/6000
Layer 2, Layer 3 addresses, Layer 4 information, or MPLS information2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Configurable
5500/5000
Layer 2 address only
Yes
Cannot change the method
4500/4000
Layer 2, Layer 3 addresses, or Layer 4 information
Yes
Yes
Yes
Configurable
2900XL/3500XL
Layer 2 address only
Yes
Yes
Configurable
3750/3560
Layer 2 or Layer 3 address only
Yes
Yes
Yes
Configurable
2950/2955/3550
Layer 2 address only1
Yes
Yes
—1
Configurable
1900/2820
These platforms use a special method of load balancing. See theCatalyst 1900/2820 section for details.
8500
Layer 3 address only
Yes
Cannot change the method
1 For the 3550 series switch, when source-MAC address forwarding is used, load distribution based on the source and destination IP address is also enabled for routed IP traffic. All routed IP traffic chooses a port based on the source and destination IP address.
2 For the 6500 series switches that run Cisco IOS, MPLS layer 2 information can also be used for load balancing MPLS packets.
The document url is http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/etherchannel/12023-4.html
Another document says the below mentioned things for load-balancing :
inally, here is full list of valid load-distribution methods:
•dst-ip—Load distribution on the destination IP address
•dst-mac—Load distribution on the destination MAC address
•dst-port—Load distribution on the destination TCP/UDP port
•src-dst-ip—Load distribution on the source XOR destination IP address
•src-dst-mac—Load distribution on the source XOR destination MAC address
•src-dst-port—Load distribution on the source XOR destination TCP/UDP port
•src-ip—Load distribution on the source IP address
•src-mac—Load distribution on the source MAC address
•src-port—Load distribution on the source port
The document url is https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/63064
Please suggest.

What is the maximum number of line items we can enter in an order...

Hi,
Can anyone explain what is the max number of line items that v can enter in an order....
or if i want to increase the number of line items than the max where it is controlled.
Because my mm counter part is facing this in the PO he could make only 9999,the problem is when posting...the accounting document is not getting generated bcas of exceeding the limit.
venugopal

hi,
this is my personal experiance that we can enter at the most 499 line items in SALES ORDER.
This is because for every line item there will be 2 financial entries, debit and credit. and 1 FI document can have at the most 999 line items (which we can not increase without KEY fromSAP)
If we divide 999 by 2 then it comes to 499.50 so you can enter at the most 499 line items in Sales order.
Regards
Vishal

What is the maximum number of matching entires that can be included in a filter ?

I have created a message filter for "junk".
I seem to have added one too many entries and now it does not filter any new "junk" entries.
I have deleted some of the new entries and added them again, only to find they are not filtered.

You may be right about CLI vs GUI differences...
Call me a geek - but I wanted to see what would happen when my system hit the limit. So I saved all open documents, used a loop to create 40 passwordless accounts, then set up a login item so that on login, FUS would be invoked to log in to the next sequential uid.
When I came back (some time later), the system was logged in to the 40th user, and with a few exceptions, things seemed to be working ok...
The most obvious problem was that SystemUIServer was crashed in most of the users. I'm not sure when that started, but at some point after so many logins, it wasn't possible to launch the SystemUIServer, meaning no FUS menu (among other things). Other programmes launched and worked ok, though a bit sluggish (I had 7 swap files at that point, where it is rare for me to have more than two). But "Terminal.app" worked fine, and FUS was possible via command line so that wasn't a big problem, and the few other accounts I switched over to check were in a similar state.
The "Accounts" pref pane seems to be limited to showing 42 accounts (I had several accounts prior to creating the 40 test accounts), but the FUS menu (viewed from an account where SystemUIServer hadn't crashed) showed them all. I forgot to check the "Login Window".
Of course, there may be other things that don't work under these conditions that I didn't stumble across, but depending on whether or not SystemUIServer is required, and probably load and RAM availability, it looks like it is possible to squeeze at least 40 logins at once on a system.
And again, this obviously isn't "official" in any way.

What is the maximum number of user accounts that can be logged in at once?

How many users can be logged in at once, using Fast User Switching (FUS)?
Ideally, I'd like an "official" answer from Apple, or if someone can refer me to "official" Apple documentation that answers this question, that would be fine.
I think the answer is 10 but need to know for sure.
Thanks in advance!
Mac OS X (10.4.9)

You may be right about CLI vs GUI differences...
Call me a geek - but I wanted to see what would happen when my system hit the limit. So I saved all open documents, used a loop to create 40 passwordless accounts, then set up a login item so that on login, FUS would be invoked to log in to the next sequential uid.
When I came back (some time later), the system was logged in to the 40th user, and with a few exceptions, things seemed to be working ok...
The most obvious problem was that SystemUIServer was crashed in most of the users. I'm not sure when that started, but at some point after so many logins, it wasn't possible to launch the SystemUIServer, meaning no FUS menu (among other things). Other programmes launched and worked ok, though a bit sluggish (I had 7 swap files at that point, where it is rare for me to have more than two). But "Terminal.app" worked fine, and FUS was possible via command line so that wasn't a big problem, and the few other accounts I switched over to check were in a similar state.
The "Accounts" pref pane seems to be limited to showing 42 accounts (I had several accounts prior to creating the 40 test accounts), but the FUS menu (viewed from an account where SystemUIServer hadn't crashed) showed them all. I forgot to check the "Login Window".
Of course, there may be other things that don't work under these conditions that I didn't stumble across, but depending on whether or not SystemUIServer is required, and probably load and RAM availability, it looks like it is possible to squeeze at least 40 logins at once on a system.
And again, this obviously isn't "official" in any way.

What is the maximum number of files that Finder can display in a directory?

When displaying systems in an Active Directory domain, Finder only displays some of the systems.
I presume that Finder is treating the list of SMB/CIFS systems as if they were entries in a file directory. The number of systems that should appear in the list is around 10,000 but only about half of these are displayed in Finder.
Is there a way to increase the number of systems displayed in Finder?

Yes, I am working with a Windows Active Directory domain.
When using Finder>Network> to display systems in an Active Directory domain, it fails to display all of the systems. Is there a Finder limitation that causes this?
When the system was originally brought online, only the local systems that were members of the Active Directory domain were displayed. Over time, the number of systems that have been "discovered" has increased. The entries are maintained in ascending alphabetical order. Currently, only systems with names beginnig with A through M are listed.
This creates a bit of a problem for our Technical Publications group as all of the systems in our facility start with the letter T.
Does Finder have a limit on how many entries that it can display for a given directory?
Is the list of Active Directory systems being maintained in memory and, hence, limited by memory resources?
Is there a way to filter the list?

The maximum number of PDF documents that can be simultaneous openned in the browser has been exceede

I'm currently build a WinForms application that uses the built-in webbrowser to view PDF files. However, I just started getting this message. I saw someone's post but in was in the archive section and looks like it was never resolved. So I'm asking for Adobe's help if they're on here to put up a FAQ somewhere describing this error.
I'm currently on Reader 8.1.2.
Jeff

First, no one is addressing Adobe here. This is a User 2 User forum. I'm
not sure this is really a Reader issue as opposed to a Microsoft issue.
Microsoft applications have a habbit of holding onto documents until the
application is closed. Since you are most likely using MSIE, it is
probably still holding onto the document via the reader plug-in until it
quits.
However, if you wish to log it as a Reader bug, here is the appropriate
link:
Mike

What is the maximum number of devices that can be connected with FaceTime?

I have tried to find in theh Apple web pages the maximum number of devices that one can connect to with FaceTime. Specifically, how many iPad2 or iPad (new) devices can connect to each other with FaceTime? What about an older iMac running Mountain Lion with iPads? Or, iPhone4s and iPads? Thanks for any information you can provide.

I don't know of any limit, as long as each device has its own individual identification ( e-mail address, or phone number for iphones)

What is the maximum number of text characters

Probably has been asked before, but what is the maximum number of text characters that can be used in a song title and still be burned to a disk. TIA

Are the files tucked away in some deeply nested folder. I've not used Toast (being a PC) but my experience of other burning software suggests that it is usually designed to truncate the filenames to meet the specification of the format it is using. Also I believe "Red Book" is the audio standard so the output will simply be a number of audio tracks with the accompanying index. Filenames on the output end should be irrelevant, unless you've enabled CD Text which is not Red Book standard, and again Toast should enforce any field limits. Perhaps Toast is having trouble reading the files rather than a problem writing them. I assume the files are on an internal drive and you are not trying to burn DRM'd files.
Use a rewritable disc and clone a small audio file multiple times, giving them filenames of 40,45,50,55 etc. characters then try to burn them in a list of increasing length of filename - see which one Toast hangs on.
tt2

What happens when you reach the maximum number of failed attempts on the lock screen password of iPod Touch?

Do you get the screen that says, "iPod is disabled. Connect to iTunes", or do you get that screen when you reach the maximum number attempts on the restrictions password?

Thank you. I am out of town traveling and my daughter sent me a picture saying the got the before mentioned message. She told me she forgot her lock screen password, and that just boggled my mind considering she locks and unlocks that thing 1000 times daily. I automatically assumed she was trying to guess the password I put on the restrictions page.

How can we increase the maximum number of records which we export from UME

Hi All,
Is there any way to increase the maximum number of records which we can export from the UME.
Please give your valuable suggestions as soon as possible.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Ramalakshmi.S

I didn’t find any configuration you can set to increase the number. I think it is related UI. The number is designed programmatically.
Lisa Zheng
TechNet Community Support

Maximum number of documents knowledge directory can handle

Hi,
I am wondering, what could be the maximum number of documents knowledge directory can handle in terms of indexing and search in WCI 10.0.3 release.
I tried to google and also browsed oracle documentation but didn’t get any clue about the number of taxonomy documents it can handle.
We have to develop a portlet which can perform a customized search (based on custom properties) on a taxonomy folder which would contain almost 2, 00, 000 documents.
Would it be possible in term of performance to manage this number of documents in WCI?
Regards,

Based on the wording of your post, I assume some degree of familiarity with WCI. Now, there are quite a few variables besides the raw number of documents when it comes to acceptable indexing and search performance. Your best options are: try it, or (if you have a support contract) go through support to get a good answer based on your intended production environment.

Maximum Number Of Records Import Manager can handle.

Hi Guys,
I want to know the maximum number of records Import Manager can import / handle at a time.
Thanks in advance .
Best Regards,
Ramchandra Kalkar.

Amol,
The reference guide lists the limit at 50,000 records.
My experience is that this is not necessarily the case. To me it seems as though the maximum import depends somewhat on the number of fields you are trying to import. Meaning you can probably import 50,000 records if the file only contains two columns/fields, but if the file contains many columns/fields you probably will encounter difficulty trying to import 50,000 records at a time.

What's the maximum number of bookmarks the Library can hold?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for