What to do with Aperture and iPhoto now?

Now that I have Photos on my computer (OS X 10.10.3), can I uninstall/delete iPhoto and Aperture?
I have no need for their functionality, since I will just use Photos (to replace iPhoto functions) and Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop for more advanced functions (including what I could do with Aperture).
To clarify, I should say, is it safe to delete the two apps (iPhoto and Aperture) without affecting my photo library?

I mean the apps. They don't take up 'minimal storage', instead aperture and iphoto apps take up around 2.5gb of space. I have a large SSD, but I would still like this space back.
Make a bootable clone or another full backup of your SSD. You may not be able to ever reinstall iPhoto or Aperture otherwise, since they have been pulled from the App Store.
If you should discover later, that the migration of your libraries has been faulty and you need to repeat it after repairing your libraries, you will be out of luck.
Remember, it is is just one day after the first release of Photos as version 1.0.  There are very likely some bugs and I would not burn all bridges before the library has been thoroughly tested and you are very confident, that this release is working well on your Mac.
My concern is that there is a shared library, and by deleting the two other apps, the ones the new one relies on, that the there might be some data loss. I wanted clarification. If an app is intended to replace two other apps, then why doesn't it replace it?
The links between the library are hard links. As long as one of the libraries is still referencing one of the linked image files, that file will not be deleted from the disk.   Six Colors: The (hard) link between Photos and iPhoto

Similar Messages

  • Getting organized with Aperture and iPhoto

    Hmm, meanwhile it is a bit of a mess....
    Imported my iPhoto library some times back into Aperture 1.1 (thus copied not referenced). So everything is in the rolls projects and referenced in folders/albums (the way Aperture imports an iPhoto library). New stuff is imported into Aperture projects, subdivided with libraries inside. So now I have the the same stuff e.g. "castles" as Aperture project and library (with actual pictures in the iPhoto rolls projects). Started to move the pictures out of the iPhoto rolls projects but that's a lot of work. I'm thinking of deleting the whole iPhoto library in Aperture and reimport it now as referenced pictures to get rid of the duplicates but I will loose any editing I did inside Aperture.
    Before I start with this tedious task, I like to know, how you deal with the coexistence of Aperture and iPhoto on your system?
    Then there is the other way round, using Aperture pictures in iLife. This can now easily be done with the Aperture preview pics, but the bad thing in this concept is, that you have to decide on the resolution of the previews before you actually know for which task you need them in iLife. For a slideshow you only need monitor resolution, for an iMovie 480p project even less, but for a calendar or book in iPhoto probably the full resolution of the master. So be on the save side and do full resolution previews of all pics wasting a lot of hard-disk space? Or do 1600x1200 previews for slideshows and movies and for books manually import full res versions into iPhoto? Or simply not doing previews at all and transferring all pictures with the resolution needed for the task prior to iPhoto? It would be great, if the iApps would treat the Aperture pics like smart objects in Photoshop, thus generating a preview in the resolution they need, but that is wishful thinking.
    Again how do you deal with that?
    Thanks for you comments.
    Peter
    Quad G5   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   GT 7800

    The only way to use pictures in both is to use referenced files, and point both libraries at it. This will be a completely manual process -- both will point to the same RAW files, and you need to import them into both. iPhoto will create a JPEG version it works with, and Aperture will store its info.
    There's work there. It's most typical to just stop using iPhoto when you have Aperture. As for previews, the full-resolution ones do take more space, but give you more flexibility. Still, the JPEG generated on quality 8 from a 10 MB RAW file may be 1-1.5 MB. You may worry about the extra space -- but be aware that iPhoto is creating JPEG versions of EVERY file as well. If you stop using iPhoto your net space if you do full res previews will be some sort of savings overall.

  • .Mac Galleries with Aperture and iPhoto

    I recently upgraded from iPhoto to Aperture.
    I have a number of .Mac Web Galleries that I posted from iPhoto. After starting to use Aperture I have begun to post my .Mac Web Galleries from Aperture instead. It has been smooth except for one problem. All my galleries from iPhoto appear on the page in chronological order of posting from earliest to latest. The Aperture posted gallery however appeared at the beginning (earliest) and thus out of order.
    Anyone know how to change the order of galleries if some are in iPhoto and some in Aperture? Any way to make sure the Aperture posted galleries appear "after" the iPhoto ones?

    This problem is extremely irritating. For all the 'good looks' of .mac/mobleme's web gallery, you can change the desired order of albums on the MobileMe gallery page until the cows come home, but it doesn't stick. Something that a 10 year old could do with hard coded HTML seems beyond the ability of Apple's web 2.0. This is just one of the really limiting shortcomings of .mac web galleries: No ability to display captions (version names only). No ability to display photo locations via geotagging (esp. now the iphone, and Aperture, can do such). Frequent problems when trying to update an already published gallery (trying to add in a new photo from Aperture is hit or miss for me). So far, galleries remain a great concept with poor execution. Is anyone at Apple listening?

  • Two cameras with Aperture and iPhoto

    Hello, Is there a way to have Aperture open when I connect my DSLR and have iPhoto open when I connect my Point&Shoot?

    Unfortunately no. A camera is a camera, so if you have the system set to open an app on camera connect, it will be used for all cameras.
    Probably best to set it to "do nothing" and manually start the app you want first. If have Aperture running and plug in a camera, the import window will fire up automatically. Not sure about iPhoto... I don't use it as Aperture pretty makes it unnecessary.

  • My optical drive will not read any music cds now or recognize a blank cd in the drive. it might read some data discs. what is wrong with it and how do i fix it?

    My optical drive will not read any music cds or recognize a blank cd. it might read some data cds. what is wrong with it and how can i fix it?

    The optics might be dirty. Try running a cleaning CD through it and see if that makes a difference.
    If not, it will have to be replace.
    Allan

  • Aperture and iPhoto...a marriage?

    Do you mean it would be great if Aperture behaved like Adobe Bridge? Meaning you can open Bridge, point it to the iPhoto library execute changes within Bridge or PS (version whatever) and have it reflect the changes in iPhoto. That would be very cool, very cool indeed. As it stands I don't think it can, I hope I can be proven wrong. Because both programs are designed to run independent I don't think you will ever have the two programs work off of one "Library" and reflect changes respectively in either program. A work around I have tried using is set Aperture as your main import/edit manager. Work on your images and when finished drag them over to iPhoto. As you can guess the problem here is now you have two copies of the same image, even more given the extensiveness of your edits. If anyone can solve this problem (looking in your direction Apple) I would think there would be a great deal of happy people and more would be inclined to give Aperture a go. The End....I'm off to try and point iPhoto to the Aperture Library and see what happens.

    QUOTE: "I don't like all this reference and non destructive editing stuff. Have one copy, back it up somewhere and work on the original. The way Aperture is set up you end up with too many edits and "stacks" there for bloating your work flow and perhaps HD space. I'm not sure how this applications functions in "real world" use by photographers but I would be interested in hearing about it."
    Where to begin??
    For one thing, Aperture's soon-to-be main competitor, LightRoom, works on the same principle, so there seems TO BE merit in this type of software (some say it's the wave of the future). It's a marriage of DAM (digital asset management) with meta editing. You are working with a different paradigm, pixel editing individual files, not meta editing. The master file in Aperture is the "root" file for all derivatives. You only need to have that one (pixel-based) file stored on HD, all other versions are merely instructions (meta data) that tell the software how to display the master with global changes applied. This data requires much less disk space. What you are doing is making a copy of an original and pixel editing it, resulting in another huge file being saved.
    QUOTE: "As I wrote before I would love to be able to use any image editor working off of one central folder of images having any changes reflect in the central folder reflected in any image organizer (Aperture, iPhoto). "
    Again, you are looking for the editor to make permanent changes to a file that any other editor/organizer can read. If that's what you want, then Aperture (and Lightroom, Lightzone, and other new photo-based editors) is not what you want. If you accept the concept of non-destructive editing, then a database is essential, and once you have that built into an app, then you need other apps to be familiar with that database in order to read the edits. Since we're at the beginnings of this new paradigm, your other apps will not have the capability of reading Aperture libraries, and may never. (Adobe is now updating Photoshop and Bridge to be compatible with Lightroom - they've been in the same boat.) As it is, Aperture can send a tiff file off to Photoshop for tweaking. That file then becomes a new master in Aperture. The original master is still there in Aperture, allowing you to make more versions.
    Using your system, if you had many tens of thousands of images, you'd soon get lost in a sea of backed up originals, and derivatives. With no database component (DAM) available, you'd be left to your own devices - with folder and file naming conventions your only way to find your way around.
    - Pierre

  • Should I Uninstall Aperture and iPhoto? warning-long and complicated!

       Due to trying to combine 2 libraries from 2 different computers, and trying to relocate masters, I've created a bit of a cluster, shall we say. I first ended up with 7,000 images on my desktop that i didn't allow aperture to locate originals. of course i didn't realize this was happening until after the fact. then i couldn't empty my trash after putting a couple old backups in it. then my finder stopping responding and i couldn't empty the trash, couldn't remove any of the files from the desktop, and on and on. tried to get into the finder window/destop via the mail app-it was the only way the finder window would open and delete the files that way. no luck. finally just went to the genius bar, and they were kind enough to take a little extra time and hooked up to their network and deleted all the crap off the desktop.
    The problem now, is that Aperture keeps crashing, and iPhoto keeps wanting to update thumbnails. Can't really move about or do anything in Aperture AT all now.
    I have repaired permissions, repaired the library, and am now trying a rebuild. If this doesn't work, i think my only option is to start over. i do have a good backup of Aperture/iPhoto will all files intact on an EHD.
    Phew....hope this makes sense, and looking for guidance if possible. If I do need to start over, would I just uninstall Aperture, and iPhoto, then re-download them, or just drag and drop the backup from the EHD and that will work?
    thanks so much to any "helpers"!

    1macprincess! wrote:
    thanks corky! since i'm such a novice, a little of that was over my head, but i love to learn new things!
    Sorry if I gave too much detail. In a nutshell, the user library folder (which is hidden by default in Lion and Mountain Lion) simply holds settings for any given program including settings the user can change in the program. All of the files in that folder are recreated either automatically by the program when launched again, or by the user making setting changes in the program again. Leaving them in place for a re-install is fine as long as none are corrupted.
    Well, i kinda jumped ahead, and hope i didn't make it worse. I already put the corrupt AP library in my trash and it's emptying right now. i didn't see the need to keep it, plus with as many files as it contained (over 300,000 as i said), I felt like i needed to get it off my hd. kind of like smelly old food! (bad analogy, i know!)
    Not a problem since you have a known good backup library on the EHD.
    So, that said, if i understand correctly, i will open Ap after, import a few images-from where? I won't have a library any more. Then if i works correctly, I would drag the good backup from my EHD, to the PIctures folder in the Finder window, and then import to Aperture from there? Just do "import", and then that's it, or is it more complicated than that?
    Once you launch Aperture for the first time after re-install, import any pictures you have to test with. Take a couple pictures on your camera and then import those. Make sure you can import successfully and that you can add adjustments. Then export them to anywhere you want (Desktop, Pictures folder, or any other folder) to make sure the export function works correctly. If all is fine, quit Aperture and then delete that library (which should be quite small and quick to delete).
    Connect the EHD and then drag your known good backup library to the Pictures folder and then double-click it to load it. You should then be back to square one before everything went sideways (assuming the backup is a managed library with the Master (Originals) in the library).
    Note - if you were running a Referenced library (where the Masters (Originals) were located outside the library package in Finder folders) - then you will need to make sure the Masters (Originals) are located in their correct locations before launching the good library so the library will locate them automatically. I mention this because you said in your opening post that you were combining libraries and relocating Masters so I am not sure what type of library the known good backup library is.
    FWIW, the default library type for Aperture is a Managed library where the imported images are stored inside the library package.

  • Unify aperture and iphoto libraries: the book (tricky) issue

    I had been in the process of migrating from iPhoto to Aperture for a while now.
    I imported iPhoto library in Aperture few monthes ago and am now using only Aperture.
    Everything is fine for two things:
    - I could not import the books (format is not compatible), so i had to keep the iPhoto library
    - I didn't want to duplicate the orignals , so they are still in iPhoto library
    With Aperture 3.3, the library could be unified with iPhoto
    I would like to move all originals to Aperture library and still be able to open from iPhoto (so far, easy) but also keep the iPhoto books (which as far as i know are still incompatible with aperture books formats)
    In other words, i want one aperture library, including masters, and I want to be able to open it from iPhoto, and still keep the old books (that were built from the initial iPhoto library) in iPhoto
    Any clue ?

    Hi Leonie,
    You're really full of resources (not sure if this french expression translates well in english, but you get the idea) !
    I finally found a way, not the most elegant one, but it's working:
    0. Open each book in iPhoto. Delete in the book non-used photos of the book (in project list, choose book, then choose photos in the toolbar in the bottom, display non placed photos, delete). Now books projects only contain photos actually used in the book. (this step may not be necessary, but it speeds the process)     
    0. bis: Backup your Aperture library. don't forget to stop also any automatic backup process (like time machine)
    1. Open the iPhoto library with Aperture (remember i had already migrated to Aperture 3,3 & iPhoto 9, which makes the libraries compatibles)
    2. Export each of your books as a phototheque (right click on the book in the inspector navigator/ choose export impression project as a phototheque). Give specific name, for example "project x"
    3. Open first created book phototheque in aperture
    4. Tag photos of the phototheque with a specific keyword, for example "book x"
    5. Close phototheque for "book x" and resume on step 3 for other phototheques
    6. Open default aperture Library
    7. Import first phototheque, merge with Aperture Library
    8. Normally you get duplicates, especially if you have added metadata or edited the photos in aperture since you created the books in iPhoto. At least that's what happened to me
    9. You can now grab the recent metadata on the one that was already in Aperture and apply it to the imported one. To do that, create a smart album with the keyword "project x"; then move all new imported events from iPhoto to the event where they belong in aperture. Then in the smart album, for a specific picture when you choose "display in the project" (i have defined a shortcut) you are in the event where the duplicate photo also sits. Choose cmd shift C on the photo with metadata, cmd shift V on the photo with the tag  "project x" to transfer the metadata. You can delete the first one, except if you had edited the original differently in the book and in aperture and want to keep both. You still have to re-enter the faces on the imported one
    10. You can erase the tag "project x"
    11. Go back to step 7 for other books
    12. Check you can see your books in iphoto when opening aperture library with iphoto. You can now consolidate the aperture library and migrate all referenced iPhoto pics inside the aperture library
    13. you can erase iPhoto Library and other books phototheques created in step 2
    You now have one unified library, that you can use in aperture and iPhoto, with your old iPhoto books in it.
    (you also have lost a few hours...)

  • How to get Aperture and iPhoto to use Pentax *ist DL RAW images natively

    Using some techniques that I found in various places in these forums, I am going to give step-by-step instructions to get Aperture and iPhoto to recognize Pentax *ist DL RAW images natively.
    Note: This worked for me using 10.4.6 with the latest iPhoto 06 and Aperture updates. I do NOT know if this will work on older versions of OS X, iPhoto, or Aperture.
    Note: If you also use a Pentax *ist DS camera, these instructions will probably disable support for that particular device due to the modifications made to a system file. Only complete these instructions if you want to use a *ist DL camera.
    ** These instructions involve modifying system level files using a HEX editor. If you are not comfortable with this, do NOT attempt to do this or you could kill your system. Remember, BACKUP BACKUP BACKUP. These steps worked great for me but follow at your own risk!! **
    Ok, lets begin...
    1) Download this great patch by macintosh_tech
    http://idisk.mac.com/macintosh_tech-Public
    This patch contains an updated raw.plist file which includes the RAW information for the *ist DL. This patch also contains an updated libRaw.dylib file and an updated Raw Presets file for Aperture.
    ** Do NOT copy the libRaw.dylib file from this patch to the folder listed in the patch Read_Me. This file did not work on my Intel-based Mac and crashed my system!!
    I was able to modify my original libRaw.dylib file using a HEX editor to get it to work on my system. Instructions for this modification will follow.
    2) Open the .dmg of the patch in a Finder window
    3) Open a new finder window and browse to /System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Frameworks/ImageIO.fra mework/Resources
    *4) Backup the libRaw.dylib and Raw.plist files. Copy them to a safe location. For extra safety, you can just copy the whole Resources folder to a safe location (Make sure that you COPY it and dont MOVE it)*
    5) Right-click the libRaw.dylib file and select "Get Info". Look at the bottom of the info window and expand the "Ownership & Permissions" tab. In this section, expand the "Details" tab. If the lock icon is in the locked position, click it to unlock it. Change "Owner" to your user name. If requested, enter your system password at this point. Close the info window. This step lets you modify the libRaw.dylib file.
    6) Complete step 5 for the Raw.plist file.
    7) Copy the Raw.plist file from the "Place In System Folder" folder from the patch to the Resources folder. It will ask you if you wnt to overwrite the existing file. Click "Replace".
    8) Open a new finder window and browse to the /Users/YOURUSERNAME/Library/Application Support/Aperture/ folder.
    * 9) Backup the "Raw Decode Presets.plist" file *
    10) Copy the "Raw Decode Presets.plist" file from the "Place In Home Directory" folder from the patch to the /Users/YOURUSERNAME/Library/Application Support/Aperture/ folder. Click "replace" if it asks you.
    11) Here's the tricky part. Download a HEX editor if you don't have one. I used 0xED. It is free and can be downloaded from
    http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/29521
    12) Open the libRaw.dylib file from the Resources folder in your HEX editor.
    Note: This is your original libRaw.dylib file from your /System/Library/...../Resources/ folder, NOT the file from the patch.
    Use the Find function and search for the string "Pentax *ist DS". Make sure you are using "Search Type: Text" (or equivilent in your editor) and that you use proper case. When you find this string, change the "S" in the "DS" to an "L". The string should now look like "Pentax *ist DL". Use the "Find Next" function to find the next instance of "Pentax *ist DS". Again, change the "S" to an "L". There should be two total instances that you need to change. Save the file and exit the editor.
    13) Open Disk Utility and repair permissions. This will set the raw.plist and libRaw.dylib files back to their original permissions.
    14) Reboot the system.
    15) You should now be able to view .PEF files natively in Aperture and iPhoto. I appologize in advance for any typos. Let me know how this works, as this is my first tutorial of this nature.
    Macbook 2.0   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    It would appear that my last post was a moot point as the 10.4.7 update adds support for the *ist DL. It's nice to have it biult into the operating system now.

  • Aperture and iPhoto should use the same library

    Hi all,
    It seems that there is a lot of conversation about moving photos between Aperture and iPhoto. For example, some like iPhotos slideshow better but still require Apertures adjustment options. Still others have tried, to no avail, to use Aperture as iPhoto's external editor.
    Personally, I have a large iPhoto library with most photos tagged with keywords. I have just started using Aperture and am yet to decide if its extra features are useful for a novice photographer like myself. Other than the price, I see no reason not to use Aperture instead of iPhoto but I would want to import my entire iPhoto library into Aperture.
    My question, however, is why we need to 'import' from one app to the other. Without understanding how the aperture / iphoto databases work, I would assume there is no fundamental reason why Aperture could not simply open an existing iPhoto library and visa versa. They both support RAW, keywords, books etc. And while I am sure there are some deviations in the databases, surely each app could simply ignore the features it does not understand.
    Is this something that anyone else has considered or think would be good. I would imagine that the easier it is for customers to upgrade from iPhoto to Aperture the better. Does Apple plan on supporting this in the future or is the import option 'good enough'.
    Cheers

    Can I and if so how do I best set up Aperture as main app. (master) with iPhoto as sub app that accesses the same library to sort through, look at, order books, etc.
    Simply set the Preferences to 'Share Previews with iLife Applications' in Aperture. Then go to iPhoto -> File -> Show Aperture Library. A media browser will open and you can drag the pics from the Browser to the iPhoto Window. Note: You're getting the Aperture Previews not Masters. Note too that if you set iPhoto to Referenced mode (iPhoto -> Preferences -> Advanced) then you won't use double the disk space.
    +Remember though, you are not accessing the Aperture Library. If you make changes in the Aperture Library (Re-edit the shots) after bringing pics to iPhoto, those changes are not reflected in iPhoto.+
    This is what William means when he says the iPhoto does not access the Aperture Library.
    Regards
    TD

  • Run Aperture and iPhoto on an external drive and edit from laptop?

    Can I run iphoto and Aperture on an external hard drive, like a file server?  Can I store pics on the external hard drive and edit using iphoto or aperture on the external hard drive from a laptop ?  How do I make this work?
    HELP!  I'm maxed out!

    Hello Laura,
    what is it, that you want to achieve?
    Move the Aperture Library to an external drive to free space on your laptop?
    or do you want to share your Aperture Libray between your machines and access it in parallel on a network volume?
    The option "1" is easy to achieve, the option "2" is not supported by Aperture; Aperture (and iPhoto) are single User programs, see this:
         Aperture: Use locally mounted Mac OS X Extended volumes for your Aperture library:http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3252
    To move your library (or parts of your library) to an external drive you have two options:
    move the complete libary using the finder to a local, external, MacOSX formatted drive,
    or turn your library into a "referenced" library: relocate the master image files to the external drive, but keep  the Library itself (much smaller now) on your laptop. This way you can browse your images and rate them, use them as screensaver, even if the external drive is not connected.
    Regards
    Léonie
    P.S. the same (*** grano salis) holds for iPhoto; you can move the library, or your libraries, to an external drive using the Finder; you can make the iPhoto Library referenced, but referenced libraries are much better supported in Aperture, for Aperture has been designed in espacially to support huge, distributed libraries - in iPhoto I found it it safer to have several smaller libraries than to have one huge, referenced library - that was one of  the reasons I moved from iPhoto to Aperture.

  • Sharing Photo's between Aperture and iPhoto and syncing to iPads, etc

    Here is my problem.
    I have 5 Macs (1 iMac, 4 laptops.) There are 4 people in my family and we have the family pack of iLife. The iMac is where everything sits with a time capsule and Drobo hanging off of it - about 6 TB's of data. Each Mac sync's with a variety of iPods, iTouchs and iPads. All linked to a user. So for example, all my oldest son's devices sync with only his laptop.
    Well, I finally fixed my media (songs, movies, TV shows, etc) problem by leveraging home share in iTunes and authorizing all my Macs. But not so lucky yet for Photo's.
    Here is the my photo dilemma.
    I like Aperture for the editing and ability to handle large libraries better. So I have Aperture installed on the iMac where everything sits. iPhoto is also installed on the iMac and iPhoto is on all 4 other laptops. Prior to moving to Aperture, sharing photo's between computers was relatively easy using sharing in iPhoto - although it appears sharing in iPhoto is different than home share in iTunes. I converted my iPhoto library on the iMac to Aperture - now sharing is a pain in the neck.
    Ideally, a Home Share like feature would be built into Aperture and iPhoto with another feature that would allow you to "check for new photos" on the laptops and pull them into Aperture - but wishful thinking right now.
    So my while my 2 new iPads are awesome - they are basically useless for Photo's as they are synced to 2 laptops that use iPhoto, but all my Photos are in Aperture on the iMac.
    Thoughts anyone????
    Thanks

    What was the question?
    Regards
    TD

  • Aperture and iPhoto

    I have been following some of the discussion on Aperture and iPhoto. I have not yet purchased Aperture but am seriously considering it. I am attracted to the extensive edits that can be done in Aperture yet I still like the slide show function in iPhoto. It seems that only iPhoto has the one function I would like to use on occasion, the Ken Burns Effect. My questions:
    1. If I shoot RAW images (Nikon NEF) can I place edited images from Aperture into the iPhoto slideshow (which I like because of the Ken Burns Effect)? Will I have to convert them to jpeg?
    2. If I shoot jpeg images will I have any limits in editing in Aperture, such as highlight and shadow adjustments, dodge and burn adjustments, and white balance adjustments?
    3. Is my understanding correct that "camera settings" can only be modified in RAW files and that RAW files can not be used in slide shows?
    I would appreciate any assistance to aid my understanding of the interaction iPhoto and Aperture, mainly the slide show features.
    WM

    1. If I shoot RAW images (Nikon NEF) can I place edited images from Aperture into the iPhoto slideshow (which I like because of the Ken Burns Effect)? Will I have to convert them to jpeg
    In the Aperture Preferences there's an option to Share the Previews with iLife and iWork applications. In iPhoto you can go File -> Show Aperture Library and a media browser will open. You can drag the images from the Media Browser to the iPhoto Window and they will be imported. Then you can make your Slideshow.
    2. If I shoot jpeg images will I have any limits in editing in Aperture, such as highlight and shadow adjustments, dodge and burn adjustments, and white balance adjustments?
    Yes, but not because of Aperture. A jpeg is a compressed file, data has been thrown away to make it. Therefore there's less data to manipulate so the range of effect possible is less. Think of it this way: Draft a paper of 50 pages. Rewrite it down to 10 pages. Now try and have the same range of editing on the 10 page doc as you had on the 50 page doc. Nothing to do with your word processor, just less words to process...
    3. Is my understanding correct that "camera settings" can only be modified in RAW files and that RAW files can not be used in slide shows?
    I don't know about Camera Settings but the Aperture manual says (pg510) that to make a high quality slideshow be sure to use high resolution previews - which rather suggests that it's the Previews and not the RAWs that are used in the show.
    Regards
    TD
    Message was edited by: Terence Devlin

  • Aperture and iPhoto library deleted

    I upgraded my Aperture w/no problem. About one month later, all images in Aperture and iPhoto dissapeared. "Genius Bar" checked, said no problem and didn't have a clue. Bought a Time-Machine backup at store, had a consultant there show me how to set up, but he had a problem as the Airport Utility was gone. He said that was rare and downloaded it. He suggested there could be a connection to all this. I'm afraid to use the iMac. Help? Doing search for images or libraries no good, will show libraries, but with zero files. Tnx.  Leif

    How did you import your old iPhoto photos? And with what Aperture version?
    Before the unified Aperture - iPhoto library has been introduced, it was possible to import an iPhoto library as referenced. This left all originals in the iPhoto library, so iPhoto continued to work, but Aperture could use the master files. Is that the way you imported your iPhoto library, with the master files in there original location?
    When trying to e.g. export a file Aperture says 'The selected original image is either offline or not found. Please reconnect it and try again.'.
    That is the typical error message, when Aperture cannot access the original files. And Aperture wil not be able to do anything with your images, unless you restore the missing originals.
    Just moved my Aperture-library to my new iMac.
    Where did you move your Aperture library from ? From an older mac?  From a backup?
    Did Aperture work on that old Mac and could access the originals?
    Do you still have that old mac, and is there any chance that recovery software could retrieve the missing original files on that mac?
    Sometimes Aperture reports originals as missing, even if they are managed inside the Aperture library.
    You can find out, where Aperture is looking for the original files, if you select some image files in the browser and use Aperture's command "File > Locate Referenced Files".
    In the panel that opens, you can see the path to missing files in the upper right corner below the thumbnail.
    What do you see, when you use that command?

  • Using both aperture and iphoto

    is there a way to use both aperture and iphoto without duplicating all the pictures? can I just point aperture to the iphoto folder with my pictures? i would like to use both, but don't want to have to duplicate all of my pictures, my hard drive can't handle my heavy shutter finger twice over.

    Fundamentally our need/pain drives our determination of the best solution.
    iPhoto is great as you say for integration cross iLife, basic photo management and basic edits.
    Once you start to use Aperture with any volume of photos, it rapidly dawns on you how basic iPhoto is. I have tried both, and used iPhoto from iLife 04 onwards. iPhoto becomes unwieldly when you start throwing 100, 200, 500 or a 1,000 images at it. Compares and selects, sorting on different metadata, all slicker than iPhoto. But when it comes to image adjustments, there really is no comparison. Highlights/Shadows, Levels with quarter points, spot/patch controls ... smoothing, etc. To say nothing of seeing your original and modified(s) side by side. Or how about non-destructive crops so you can create the best possible presentation of the object with the overall image? Organization and navigational structure? Built in backup (Vaults) so that it is easy to back up. Yes, I'm sold on Aperture and that's why I now export just my finished (keepers) results back to iPhoto and not the other way around.
    As your volumes grow, and your experience with Aperture grows, I'm sure you will start to reconsider.
    Have fun.
    G.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Setting up Intuos4 tablet with Photoshop CC 2014

    I'm a digital artist who is moving from using PS Elements 12 to CC, and I can't seem to setup my small Wacom Intuos4 tablet correctly. I can write and use the pen tablet, but all brush dynamics aren't working, even though  I have them set to work wit

  • Issue with Portal

    We have created new report in Omniportal. It is working fine in Test instance, but in Production, it is failing inconsistently. The log shows the following 13/03/26 16:06:13 webClipping: ERROR: Exception occured in lookup in PortletDefinition in Clip

  • Unable to close backend connection

    Hello Experts, We are currently running certain Visual Composer applications in our portal 7.0. It has been observed that even after navigating away from the VC application or logging of the portal, the connection to the ABAP system does not end rath

  • HEader Line Issue

    Hi All, Previously i have declared a data as DATA: BEGIN OF t_temp OCCURS 10,       vbeln TYPE char10,       END OF t_temp. <code continues> LOOP AT t_data INTO fs_data.     IF NOT fs_data-del_no IS INITIAL.       CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA

  • Selection text and text elements contents not displayed

    I have a language related problem I have 2 servers . In first server I logged in english language and the selection text and text elements are displayed in English. The requirement is I dont want to translate these texts it should be displayed in Eng