When exchange 2010 crash

hello ,
i have to scenario:
1-suppose exchange 2010 crash or hardware faild
what to do to restore server again?
i am searched already in microsoft website i found command /m:recoverserver using to install exhange again using same
name and same ip address before implement the command need to reset computer name.
my question :
how to restore mailbox users and database?and above command is correct or not
2- suppose domain controller faild
what steps needed to recovey server
thanks and regards..

You ahve to reset the computer account in AD.
Join the server with the same name.
From command prompt You will have to run Setup /m:RecoverServer (After navigating to the Exch media folder/drive)
You have to follow this to restore from windows backup
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd876880.aspx
Here is an
article regarding backup and restore and here is a
similar thread
If your DC failed. You will have to seize the roles first if you have additional DC.
Please check these
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc816779%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
http://www.petri.com/seizing_fsmo_roles.htm
Please read this if you are looking for full Server Recovery of a DC
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772519(v=ws.10).aspx
Its highly recommended to have an additional domain controller (ADC) to recover when the FSMO holder fails. Please check this.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc535164.aspx
Change DNS IP in exchange server to the new server and restart exchange server it will connect to the next available DC/GC. You can use this command to connect to a particular DC from EMS.
Set-ADServerSettings -PreferredServer dc2.yourinternaldomain.com
Thanks, MAS
Please mark as helpful if you find my comment helpful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

Similar Messages

Outlook 2010 client ask for credential when Exchange 2010 server restart

Hi,
Each time our Exchange server is restarted (most of time for update installation), all open Outlook clients are prompt for credential.
This is annoying because when the users come back, sometime they don't take care about the credential windows and believe that's they don't receive any mail and start to prompt the support when they notice that's their mail come to their mobile but
not on Outlook...
One solution is to ask everybody to shut their computer down every time an update of the server is planned. But as the users are, by design, very lazy and don't really care about this kind of things. It isn't an acceptable solution.
Does anyone know if there is a way for stopping Outlook to ask about credential when it loose temporarily the connection with Exchange ?
Thanks for reading

Hi,
Just checking in to see if the information from Ed (DareDevil57) was helpful. Please let us know if you would like further assistance.
Regards,
Melon Chen
Forum Support
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here

Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2010 Coexistence Activesync Issue

Hello,
I am currently on the progress of migrating mails from Exchange 2003 SP2 to Exchange 2010 SP3. Before I can do actual migration, I need to make sure that OWA and Activesync works when Exchange 2010 becomes Internet facing.
Right now Exchange 2003 is Internet facing while Exchange 2010 is internal LAN only. OWA login from Exchange 2010 to a mailbox in Exchange 2003 works fine. However, trying to open a mailbox in Exchange 2003 from Exchange 2010 Activesync fails.
Activesync login from Exchange 2010 to a mailbox in Exchange 2010 works fine, as well as logging in from Exchange 2003 to mailbox in Exchange 2003.
Tests using AccessMyLAN ActiveSync Tester using Exchange 2010 as entry point are inconclusive. The test shows the app successfully contacting ActiveSync version 6.5 which is Exchange 2003, but results in "Activesync detected, but not correctly configured."
Tests using Test-ActiveSyncConnectivity from Exchange 2010 reveals Error HTTP 400 when contacting Exchange 2003. The cmdlet also shows it successfully contacting Activesync version 6.5 (Exchange 2003).
I have searched around, installed hotfix KB937031, enabled Integrated Windows Authentication on Exchange 2003 Microsoft-Server-Activesync, disabled Require SSL for Microsoft-Server-Activesync and exchange-oma, yet I still can't connect to a mailbox inside
Exchange 2003 through ActiveSync 2010. Website Multiple Identities for port 80 has been set correctly. Exchange 2003 has Forms-Based Authentication Enabled and is the one thing we haven't tried disabling yet.
We want to make sure everything works first, then make Exchange 2010 Internet facing, and finally do the mail migration. We do not want to migrate everyone in a single sitting. Please if anyone have ideas any help is welcomed!

Exchange 2010 will proxy ActiveSync for Exchange 2003. For OWA, it will redirect, so you need a legacy redirect URL. You can test all of this internally without changing your Internet connection. For ActiveSync you can use a WiFi connection.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Exchange 2010 transfer of the license and uninstall old Exchange

Hello everyone,
I had some problems with my old Exchange 2010 as it was freezing from time to time. I decided to install a new Exchang 2010 server. I transferred mailboxes, MX record stays the same and I routed all e-mails to the new server now. I disconnected other server
from the network to test is everything working fine and so far so good.
My bigger concerns are following now:
a) how to transfer license as I wanna use the same license key which old server uses.
b) How to Uninstall old Exchange 2010 server.
In regards to license transfer I don't want to get to the point where I am going to get message that I used the same license key on another server. Do I have to deactivate license on the old server? How do I do that. Maybe uninstallation of it will send
a signal to Microsoft that license is gone. Has anyone come across this kind of issue? So what do you think should I uninstall old server first before I enter this license?
In regards to my second question which is related to the first one. How do I properly remove old Exchange 2010 server. I found some instructions that I should just go to "programs and features" and uninstall it this way or run a setup from CD.
Other instructions says that I should uninstall database over power shell and uninstall public folders etc. I would like to do it as clean as possible as I don't want my new exchange or any of DCs to look for missing Exchange later. Which option properly uninstalls
Exchange 2010 from my domain and from AD. I wanted to add that my Exchange2010 are on Windows Server 2008 R2.
I just wanted to add that I phoned Microsoft to ask about it but they said that I have to pay for support otherwise they can't help me. What would you do first? license or uinstallation of old Exchange 2010? I still have over 100 days of trial on new build
server.

Hi,
1. Arbitration mailbox is used to store organization-wide data such as administrator audit logs, metadata for eDiscovery searches, and Unified Messaging data. To avoid more issues, we recommend to move the mailboxes. And here is a reference about how to
move arbitration mailboxes:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/3912.exchange-2010-how-to-delete-the-first-database-and-move-the-system-mailboxes.aspx
2. If the public folders won’t be used in the new environment, we don’t need to move them.
3. For the issue whether the license can be used twice, we recommend you to contact with Microsoft Customer Service to confirm.
4. By default, when Exchange 2010 is installed, OAB is created in the default internal Web site in Internet Information Services (IIS).
For more information:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996917(v=exchg.141).aspx
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela Shi

Connector help ( Coexistence Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2010)

Dear all,
we are in a Coexistence state where all the mailboxes are not yet migrated to Exchange Sever 2010.
On Exchange server 2003 we have two connectors 1) Internal 3) External
1) Internal connector is used to have mail flow between postfix mail and Exchange server.
2) External Connector is used for sending/receiving emails from External domains (like gmail,yahoo etc...)
3) when we added first Exchange 2010 that time it created one RGC used for sending/receving emails between Legacy and new server.
What I want to achieve is created new two more connectors on Exchange server which will act as Internal & External connector.
if these works then delete connectors on legacy server and go ahead with for rest migration
is it possible if not then how do it ?
TheAtulA

Hi AtulA,
Thank you for your question.
Internal:
To support coexistence between these two routing topologies, all Exchange 2010 servers are automatically added to a single routing group when Exchange 2010 is installed. The Exchange 2010 routing group is recognized in Exchange System Manager in Exchange
2003 as Exchange Routing Group within Exchange Administrative Group.
During the installation of the first Exchange 2010 Hub Transport server in an existing Exchange organization, we must specify an Exchange 2003 bridgehead server to which to establish the first routing group connector. We recommend that you select a bridgehead
server located in a hub routing group or in a routing group that has many mailboxes. The routing group connector links the routing group where the Exchange 2003 server resides and the Exchange 2010 routing group. The Exchange 2010 routing group includes all
Exchange 2010 servers, regardless of the Active Directory site in which they reside.
Notice: Don't move Exchange 2010 servers out of Exchange Routing Group (DWBGZMFD01QNBJR), and don't rename Exchange Routing Group (DWBGZMFD01QNBJR) by using a low-level directory editor. Neither action is supported. Exchange 2010 must use
this routing group for communication with Exchange 2003.
External:
We could create send connector and receive connector to send/receive email from Internet, we should modify the firewall setting to point to Exchange 2010.
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know.
Best Regard,
Jim

Uninstall/Reinstall Exchange 2010 in coexisting Exchange 2003

Hi,
Can we uninstall Exchange 2010 without any affect to Exchange 2003 in the co-existing environment? I installed Exchange 2010 in existing Exchange 2003 and tried to configure for both Exchange exist in our domain. Somehow the Exchange 2010 crashed
and now it cannot start, only stuck in Initializing process. I want to uninstall and then reinstall but I don't know if doing this will cause any problem to the Existing Exchange 2003. Could someone tell me?
Thanks,
Jim

You don't have to uninstall and reinstall server, just rebuild base server with OS with what it had earlier and recover Exchange 2010 with /m:recoverserver switch.
Recover an Exchange Server
I assume you still have Exchange 2010 database backup or original files for restore if needed and this is just OS crash and can not be repaired scenario
Blog:
http://exchangeshare.wordpress.com/

Queue View keeps crashing - Exchange 2010 sp3

Queue View keeps crashing
Description:
Stopped working
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: CLR20r3
Problem Signature 01: mmc.exe
Problem Signature 02: 6.1.7600.16385
Problem Signature 03: 4a5bc808
Problem Signature 04: MMCEx
Problem Signature 05: 3.0.0.0
Problem Signature 06: 4a5bda23
Problem Signature 07: 203
Problem Signature 08: 2c
Problem Signature 09: PSZQOADHX1U5ZAHBHOHGHLDGIY4QIXHX
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.272.7
Locale ID: 1033

Hi,
Please make sure all services run as well.
Please uninstall KB2686831 if you have installed it. I found an similar thread for your reference:
MMC Crashes when to launch Hyper-V, and other MMC add-ons after applying .NET Patches
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/170a9d15-d9f1-4aff-a74d-365f993669c2/mmc-crashes-when-to-launch-hyperv-and-other-mmc-addons-after-applying-net-patches?forum=winservermanager
Also please run Test-ServiceHealth and Test-SystemHealth cmdlet to check whether there is anything abnormal on Exchange 2010 server. If yes, please paste the detailed error without sensitive information for the further troubleshooting.
Thanks
Mavis
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

Errors when trying to install Service Pack 3 for Exchange 2010

I have 2 Exchange 2010 servers that are running SP2 and I am trying to install SP3 on both.
They are installed in a DAG and so I am running the .\StartDAGserverMaintenance.ps1 script before attempting to install SP3. When attempting to run the SP3 setup I get the following errors:
Setup cannot continue with the upgrade because the 'powershell' (Machine: P-E10-2.company.com) process (ID: 5296) has open files. Close the process and restart Setup.
AND
Install hotfix Microsoft Knowledge Base article 2550886 from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2550886 to improve Windows Failover Cluster transient communication instability when deploying stretched Database Availability Groups across datacenters.
I can download the hotfix and apply it but has anyone had any issues with this particular hotfix? Does anyone have any ideas about the powershell error?
thanks for your help.

Hi,
That hotfix relates to a known issue implementing DAG's across data centres (an issue particularly with Windows failover clustering). As a best practice is should always be installed. Please review the following article, which describes why it should be
installed:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/11/20/recommended-windows-hotfix-for-database-availability-groups-running-windows-server-2008-r2.aspx
In regards to the open files, as the other poster suggested, there will be another user logged onto the server who has a powershell window open. Ensure all other users are logged off the server before performing the upgrade.
Best Regards

Internal outlook client connectivity in exchange 2010 when coexist with exchange 2013

Hi all ,
on my side i would like to clarify few queries.
Say for instance i am coexisting exchange 2010 with exchange 2013 .Unfortunately if all of my exchange 2013 servers goes down .
Q1 .On that time will the internal outlook users having their mailboxes on exchange 2010 can be able to connect mailboxes without any issues ? In case if they face any issues what kind of issues will they be? Because why i am asking is we should have pointed
the autodiscover service to exchange 2013 during coexistence.
When an user closes and reopens the outlook after whole exchange 2013 environment failure ,outlook will first query the autodiscover service for the profile changes to get it updated on users outlook profile.In such case autodiscover service will not be
reachable and i wanted to know will that affects the internal client connectivity for outlook users having their mailboxes on exchange 2010.
Q2. Apart from outlook internal users connectivity ,what kind of exchange services(i.e owa,active sync,pop,external OA and imap) will get affected when whole exchange 2013 environment goes down during coexistence ?
I have read the below mentioned statement on this awesome blog but still i wanted to clarify with you all on my scenario.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/03/12/client-connectivity-in-an-exchange-2013-coexistence-environment.aspx<o:p></o:p>
Internal Outlook Connectivity
For internal Outlook clients using RPC/TCP connectivity whose mailboxes exist on Exchange 2010, they will still connect to the Exchange 2010 RPC Client Access array endpoint.
For internal Outlook clients using RPC/TCP connectivity whose mailboxes exist on Exchange 2007, they will still connect directly to the Exchange 2007 Mailbox server instance hosting the mailbox.
Please share me your suggestions and that would help me a lot .
Regards
S.Nithyanandham

Hi Winnie Liang ,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Scenario 1 : for internal outlook connectivity
We have below settings for exchange 2010 autodiscover.
mail.domain.com - will be the namespace for internal autodiscover URI for all the exchange 2010 cas serves
We are going to have below settings for exchange 2013 autodiscover.
mail.domain.com - will be the namespace for internal autodiscover URI for all the exchange 2013 cas serves
During coexistence mail.domain.com will be pointed to exchange 2013 cas servers . I mean to say if we try to resolve the mail.domain.com it will get resolved in to the exchange 2013 cas servers.
So on such case if anything happened wrong to the new environment or else if entire environment goes down .Do we face any issues while outlook users connect to existing mailboxes in exchange 2010 ?
Because why i am asking is ,on the below mentioned article i have read all the autodiscover request will go via exchange 2013 cas servers during coexistence.That means all the existing mailboxes in exchange 2010 will also have to query exchange 2013 cas
servers for autodiscover request.During the whole exchange 2013 environemnt failure whenever the user tries to close and open outlook .Outlook will first queries the autodiscover service for any changes happened on that particular mailbox and it will try to
get it updated on user profile.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/03/12/client-connectivity-in-an-exchange-2013-coexistence-environment.aspx
Would it be possible to make the exchange 2010 mailbox users to query only the scp points which belongs to the exchange 2010 cas servers for autodiscover request ?
Scenario 2: For exchange services
mail.domain.com - will be the namespace for all the exchange 2010 services (i.e owa,activesync,external outlook anywhere,pop,imap)
mail.domain.com - will be the namespace for all the exchange 2013 services (i.e owa,activesync,external outlook anywhere,pop,imap)
What about the above services will it get affected during whole exchange 2013 environment failure ?
Note : We are not facing this issue , i hope everything goes well in my environment while doing coexistence i am just asking this question on my own interest?
Regards
S.Nithyanandham
Thanks S.Nithyanandham

When I send e-mail messages with file by using a POP3 in Exchange 2010 I received delivered message with file. How I can disable this functions that file do not include to delivery message. I use Exchange 2010 only local users.

When I send e-mail messages with file by using a POP3 in Exchange 2010 I received delivered message with file. How I can disable this functions that file do not include to delivery message. I use Exchange 2010 only local users.

I think there is not native rule for this, but you could try a transport rule which removes all attachments over a very small file size like 1KB.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/05/11/3407435.aspx
CRM Advisor

Exchange 2010 webmail - contact search returns an error when single letter is used

Exchange 2010 SP2 environment. In Webmail when a user creates a new message, pressing on the To: button to add recipients, if they search the GAL, a single letter search (A for example) returns all names starting with A.
If they try to perform the same search for their contacts they get: No results found in IE or the error below in Firefox and Chrome. If I search contacts with two letters "Ab" for example then no error occurs and I get results. So search doesn't work
the same way for contacs vs GAL. Is this normal for webmail 2010?
An unexpected error occurred and your request couldn't be handled.
Request
Url: https://webmail.contoso.com:443/owa/ev.owa?oeh=1&ns=CP&ev=LoadFresh&pfmk=M35:1407960692770;M2:1407960692796;M23:1407960694745
User host address: 10.1.3.9
User: User Name
EX Address: /o=xxxxxxx/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=username
SMTP Address: [email protected]
OWA version: 14.2.247.5
Mailbox server: MBX1.contoso.com
Exception
Exception type: System.NullReferenceException
Exception message: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Call stack
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.VirtualListView2.GetDidLastSearchFail()
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.VirtualListView2.LoadData(Int32 startRange, Int32 rowCount)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.AddressBookVirtualListView.LoadData(Int32 startRange, Int32 rowCount)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.VirtualListViewEventHandler2.InternalLoadFresh(Boolean renderHeaders)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.ContactVirtualListViewEventHandler.LoadFresh()

I doesn't happen on mine, but I'm now on SP3. It might help if you upgrade - even if you don't want to go to SP3 yet, your OWA version appears not to be at rollup 2 level. I only mention this because if it is a problem specific to version 14.2.247.5 (which
could easily be the case, because MS change the OWA scripts with surprising frequency) , it's going to be hard finding people who can reproduce the problem.
But to answer the question in the last sentence, searching the GAL and searching Contacts is, in a technical sense, very different. The GAL search is done with an LDAP query against Active Directory, whereas Contacts are usually going to be mailbox items,
plus a few AD contact items.
OWA For SmartPhone

Exchange 2010, Outlook 2010, some clients receive "server unavailable" when logging into outlook

We have a single exchange 2010 server running hub, cas, and mailbox as a virtual machine in VM 5. Currently on version 14.3 build 123.4 running on Server 2008 R2. Clients connecting to this server are all running Outlook 2010 with a mix of OS between
xp and win 7. Domain controllers are all 2003 sp2. We have a multi-campus environment with most users accessing across a WAN connection (mpls and metro-e). Quota Limits of 1gig imposed on all mailboxes. We do still
have a Exchange 2003 server that we are completing the migration of users off of in our environment. But all mailboxes on exchange 2010 are accessed thru Outlook 2010. Migration from 2003 to 2010 happens only after Office 2010 is installed.
We are a little over 50% migrated - (~750 users, 1100 entities)
I have some 2010 clients complaining that they receive "the server is unavailable" when launching outlook for the first time in the morning. A second time it usually opens. This happens for remote WAN and local LAN users. Also,
during the day as outlook is open, when trying to open an email or navigate between folders in the inbox they will also have outlook stop responding as it tries to contact the server.
Monitoring the server - CPU averages 40-50% thru the day with spikes in the 75-100%. Usually the processes that spike are Store.exe or msftefd.exe.
I have verified that IPV6 is disabled on the exchange server - and it doesn't exist on the 2003 DC's. Searching for answers keeps turning up results for OOF or Outlook 2003 RPC. Neither are the case here.
Would we benefit from adding a 2nd server into our environment? If so - hub? Cas? which would be better to offload off the primary?
or is there a better way to handle this issue?

Hi,
According to your description, the issue happens on every morning. Thus, it’s mostly likely caused by that there are too many sessions bringing the performance issue.
To confirm it, we can use performance monitor to check the following counters when Outlook works slowly:
RPC request, RPC average latency and RPC operation/sec
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335215(v=exchg.141).aspx
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 - Method to send e-mail when the WAN IP is dynamic

Hello,
I am writing due to the fact that I cannot send e-mail from my Exchange 2010 Server to my Yahoo! address for testing. When trying to do so, I get the following error message:
mta1106.mail.gq1.yahoo.com gave this error:
Mail from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx not allowed - 5.7.1 [BL21] Connections not accepted from IP addresses on Spamhaus PBL; see
http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/550-bl21.html [550]
As one can see, because my IP address is residential, I cannot send e-mail to all addresses on the web. I really would like to use this as my primary contact, and thought of using a proxy. Can someone recommend a good proxy, or workaround for this? I am
sorry for posting in Exchange 2013, but I couldn't find the 2010 forum. Thank you to all who reply.
Mike

Thank you for your reply,
I have set up DynDNS, and I am currently using my own domain name. The problem was I needed to configure a smart SMTP host, or relay server on my send connector. I decided to go with SMTP2GO, as they are cheap, and allow you to send 20 e-mails a day for
free. When the money is right, I plan to upgrade.
Thank you for your help.
Mike

Mail subject rewriting when sent to DL- Exchange 2010

Hi folks,
we have an Exchange 2010 and several DL.
We'd like to rewrite the subject of any message sent to a specific DL to ease the filtering of such messages (seen Outlook client is limited in filtering).
Any of the rules as described here don't apply
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638183(v=exchg.141).aspx
I'm pretty familiar with regular expression but last time I used the mail header to catch the condition I ended up in rewriting any message sent through Exchange.
I think this is a pretty basic function and I wonder why it's not among the offered filter options.
Has any one done that before and could he/she recommend the filter/regex to use? I guess it would be "Mail to:.*[email protected]" but as I said last time message other messages were impacted (they were messages on other DL that didn't have such
pattern in the headers as far as I remember)
Thanks in advance,
Alex

Hi Anand,
thanks for your reply but I'm afraid it doesn't apply to my case. The question is to rewrite the Subject when a message is sent to the DL regardless of who sends it (the DL might be opened in the future to external addresses as well)
Let's say that the DL My-favourite-recipies at example.com is the DL and this DL has got users A,B,C,D and E.
My understanding is that what you propose will work even in case the user A will send a private email to user E because both belong to the DL, and on top of it the management by the moderator, that is not set, is not necessary.
That's why I'm looking for the solution in the headers (since I didn't see the option "sent to DL xxxx") "IF destination email address is my-favourite-recipies at example.com" then "prepend the Subject with [My-favourite-recipies]"
I have to say that I'm not aware how Exchange treats messages sent to DLs and I though it was sufficient to set the condition to the field "RCPT TO:" but unfortunately mails to other DLs were affected.
Let me be more specific: we have a DL called waw-200 at example.com (of course I modified the domain)
and when setting the condition for such DL I used the following (W|w)(A|a)(W|w)-200 at example.com but in this way also mails sent to DLs like fps-it at example.com were touched.
Thanks Alex

Exchange 2010 Room Calendar Permissions are too permissive when Default is set to None.

Help! Room Calendar permissions are too permissive when Default is set to None.
We are a brand new Exchange 2010 shop, and have setup several conference rooms. Many of them are restricted to specific groups to book via In-Policy Requests using Resource Booking Attendant. The Room Calendar permissions for most
rooms shows only two options for the Default access: None and Full Details. Default is set to None, yet if someone opens the room calendar in Outlook (& they are not part of the In-Policy restrictions) they are able to see the full meeting details
(even open the meeting for full details). How is this possible when by default they should not have any access as it is set to None? Some rooms would not be a problem for clients to see the details, but some rooms like Executive rooms need to be
locked down so that others cannot see the room details - None.
I also found this, although it did not make a difference. If I create an Outlook profile for the room and login as the room calendar in Outlook, go to File, Options, Calendar, Resource Scheduling, Set Permissions I get different default options:
None, "Free/Busy time", "Free/Busy time, subject, location" and Full Details. Why do I have more options in this view rather than the Room Calendar Permissions? I looked at two rooms and both Default options were set to "Free/Busy
time", so I changed these settings to None. Still the clients can view the full room calendar details. What are we missing to get the room calendar locked down so it is not displaying details to everyone?

Only the default groups and Exchange Admins have Full Access to these items, so that is not the issue.
-MailboxFolderPermission 1RP07AWest:\Calendar cmdlet and it shows the same access I see when I open the calendar in Outlook and view the Permissions as shown below - Default is set to None.
As I stated in my last reply the only thing that finally forced it to be blocked is changing the Resource Scheduling permissions under Options > Calendar for that room mailbox. If I have to do that for each room calendar, it's going to
take considerable time to change each one. Is there a cmdlet to allow me to access and change that setting as well?
RunspaceId   : ea4ebc26-1d22-4a7d-b115-1b609099bae3
FolderName   : Calendar
User         : Default
AccessRights : {None}
Identity     : Default
IsValid      : True
ObjectState : New
RunspaceId   : ea4ebc26-1d22-4a7d-b115-1b609099bae3
FolderName   : Calendar
User         : Anonymous
AccessRights : {None}
Identity     : Anonymous
IsValid      : True
ObjectState : New

When exchange 2010 crash

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for