When I use paint bucket or brushes there is no colour not even black

I have recently installed Elements 9.0. I previously had 8.0 and no problems. If I try to darken skies with a black paintbrush it's all pale and so is my brush icon. I tried picking bright colours but they don't work, and I tried with the paint bucket and that's the same - no colour. Can anyone help?

Thank you - I've just been on and it is already in RGB. I'm quite
bewildered.
In a message dated 29/01/2011 09:31:02 GMT Standard Time, [email protected]
writes:
Your document may be in the grayscale color mode.
Go to Image >Mode and select RGB Color.
MTSTUNER

Similar Messages

I am using iphone model MC603B is factory unlocked and updated os 5.0 when i use any carrier in it there always on screen no service please hlep me out .

I am using iphone model MC603B is factory unlocked and updated os 5.0 when i use any carrier in it there always on screen no service please hlep me out .

SadisticIron wrote:
i just baught my first iphone and it is a jalbroken
Buzz! Thank you for playing!
Discussing jailbroken devices is forbidden here by the Terms of Service.
You can not get help here.

PSE 9 crashes when I use the Spot Healing Brush tool

When I use the Spot Healing Brush tool PSE9 crashs completly. Is it a bug? In the older version 8 I had no problem.
I use WIN XP SP2, Intel Pentium 4, 3 Ghz, GPU: NVIDIA Geforce FX 5700, DirectX 9.0c 4.09.00.0904.
I tried it also on another PC with WIN7 and it caused the same problem.
Thanks for any adivse

I know this post doesn't really help you guys, but I'm also using PSE9 on a Win7 Intel Quad Core Dell computer and the spot healing brush works fine. I only offer this post to indicate that it apparently is not a universal bug in PSE9. Perhaps an Adobe expert can jump in here and help. I can only offer that in Preferences I do have the RAM dialed up to 80%, but I don't think this is related to your problem.

Cannot use paint bucket on 32bit

i am trying to isolate the chrome ball part in my picture. and I have made a selection around my chromeball and ctrl+shift+i to reverse my selection.
and then I tried to fill it in with black color using paint bucket and it poped error message that saying it doesn't support 32bit?
I am following the tutorial on digital tutor and it works according to the tutorial and how come it is not working on my photoshop?

Yes, the paint bucket doesn't work in 32 bit/channel. Underneath it has some assumptions about the range of the image data that will take a while to resolve.
But the Fill command works just fine.

I have a WD 2 tb hard drive that I want to use to back up my Mac Pro quad core. How do I create a back up startup disk? Also, when I used Time macine, it only backed up users and not the system or library folders. Ideas?

I have a WD 2 tb hard drive that I want to use to back up my Mac Pro quad core. How do I create a back up startup disk? Also, when I used Time macine, it only backed up users and not the system or library folders. Ideas?

Welcome to Apple Support Communities
Time Machine should be enough to make a backup of your files. Also, it should back up all folders, so open System Preferences > Time Machine > Options, and make sure that there are no folders included in the excluded items list.
If you want to create a bootable clone of your hard drive, you need to use an app like Carbon Copy Cloner or the Disk Utility's Restore feature > http://pondini.org/OSX/DU7.html

I hit Forget Network and now cannot get back onto my wireless home network. All of my other computers and iphones are fine. How do I get the network back? It shows in my list of networks but when I use the password and try to join it says not connected.

I hit Forget Network and now cannot get back onto my wireless home network. All of my other computers and iphones are fine. How do I get the network back? It shows in my list of networks but when I use the password and try to join it says not connected.

See if the iPad will accept the password after you restart it. It's worth a try.
Restart the iPad by holding down on the sleep button until the red slider appears and then slide to shut off. To power up hold the sleep button until the Apple logo appears and let go of the button.
You could also try a reset as well.
Reset the iPad by holding down on the sleep and home buttons at the same time for about 10-15 seconds until the Apple Logo appears - ignore the red slider - let go of the buttons.

Dear Sirs,when i use the computer updating my iphone to ios 7.1,suddenly black out.The computer has no power and my iphone does not work and keep display the screen that connect to itunes. so when i connect my iphone to iTunes, it says"itunes has detected

Dear Sirs,when i use the computer updating my iphone to ios 7.1,suddenly black out.The computer has no power and my iphone does not work and keep display the screen saying the iphone need to connect to itunes. So when i connect my iphone to iTunes, the computer says"itunes has detected an iphone in recovery mode. you must restore this iphone before it can be used with itunes"
So my question is if I click OK(restore the iphone),will i lose all my data and whatsapp??
Thank you for your help and time.
Regards,
hopeless

If you didn't back up the phone to iCloud or iTunes (on your computer) BEFORE attempting the update, the data will be lost.

I created an apple id online and not on itunes, my email said the apple id was successfully created but when i used it in itunes it said "This apple idhas not been used in itunes please review your account information "

I created an apple id online and not on itunes, my email said the apple id was successfully created but when i used it in itunes it said "This apple idhas not been used in itunes please review your account information "

Hi rixa03!
I have a couple of troubleshooting steps for you to try to resolve this issue. First, you should try closing the app according to the instructions found on this website, which is a troubleshooting assistant for the iPad:
Apple - Support - iPad - iPad Troubleshooting Assistant
http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/assistant/ipad/#section_3
If the issue persists, you may need to try resetting the iPad, the instructions for which can be found here:
Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button together for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
iPhone, iPad, iPod touch: Turning off and on (restarting) and resetting
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1430
Thanks for using the Apple Support Communities. Have a good one!
-Braden

When I use FaceTime on iPhone 5 people I call can not hear me.

When I use FaceTime on iPhone 5 people I call can not hear me. Anyone can help me?

The lower mic is faulty, either due to logic board fault or lower mic itself fault. If lower mic itself, the replacement part is iPhone charging port assembly with flex cable, lower mic, and home button flex connector all a less than $10 single part. Apple handles this problem with replacement iPhone 4S for $199, make Genius reservation to avoid long wait time. The reason the speakphone still works is because it uses the upper mic, which is at the small pin hole at top of iPhone next to headphone jack port.

When we using overflow-x and overflow-y in tbody its not working properly. In the previous version i.e. 3.7.1 its working fine the same coding....Please help me.

''Duplicate post, continue here - [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/828024]''
when we using overflow-x and overflow-y in tbody its not working properly. In the previous version i.e. 3.7.1 its working fine the same coding....Please help me.

See:
*https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_4_for_developers#Miscellaneous_DOM_changes
*http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menu/tablescroll.html
A good place to ask questions and advice about web development is at the mozillaZine Web Development/Standards Evangelism forum.<br />
The helpers at that forum are more knowledgeable about web development issues.<br />
You need to register at the mozillaZine forum site in order to post at that forum.<br />
See http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=25

I have a FP-1600 and a FP-AO-200 module, 0-20 ma. When I use Field Point Explorer 3.0.1, I can not command any of the channel output current. The current remains in the lowest value 0.0035 A. What is the problem ?

I have a FP-1600 and a FP-AO-200 module, 0-20 ma. When I use Field Point Explorer 3.0.1, I can not command any of the channel output current. The current remains in the lowest value 0.0035 A. What is the problem ? The communications with the module are OK, because it shows when the current are open or closed.

Jorg,
I noticed that you claimed to be using the module in 0-20mA mode, yet the reading you are seeing is 3.5mA. This is the minimum value (with overranging) when the module is set to 4-20mA mode. My guess is that your module is defaulting back to 4-20mA mode, but your IAK file still thinks the module is in 0-20mA mode. You can verify this by using the find devices button in FieldPoint Explorer and then trying to write to the channel.
To fix this problem, you should use the snapshot feature to change the default power-up mode for that channel.
Regards,
Michael Shasteen
Applications Engineering
National Instruments
www.ni.com/ask
1-866-ASK-MY-NI

When do we use Pentool, live paint bucket or brush?

For example, I want to draw a bush
I know there are many different ways to create: some use pen tool, some use live paint bucket tool, some use brush and eraser.
No matter what methods we use, it all leads us to the same result. I want to draw as smart and convinient as much as possible. So I dont understand in which case what method we should use. I am recommended to use basic shapes as much as possible when drawing. But when drawing complex objects, it takes too much time to use basic shapes to create
For example, In this case I think we should use brush and eraser
I think that using pentool can make my work goes faster. But why do people use live paint bucket tool and when we need to use basic shapes to create objects?
Is that right when I said that it depends on what style of art we are creating? (such as logo, flat UI design, artwork for children, ect...)
*Question from a newbie to illustrator TT_TT*

This is the kind of question I like most to see in drawing software forums and it's increasingly rare. So first, let me commend you for thinking in terms of seeking usual and customary best practice, rather than just assuming every whiz-bang, instant gratification cheap trick feature should be employed willy-nilly without ever a thought toward the elegance of your drawing's structure. It suggests you are serious about maintaining quality in your vector drawing, rather than just assuming anything that "looks good" on your monitor is "quality."
Unfortunately, one could write a whole book on this. So I'll try to keep the following general and reasonably brief. That may make it sound a bit preachy. If you want to talk more specifics, continue the thread conversation.
Vector drawing is, by its nature, an exacting medium. It strains against itself when it pretends to be "painterly."
There is, of course, a balance between a strictly purist mindset and real-world practicality. The way to find your balance is to approach automated effects (especially new ones) with a healthy dose of skepticism. Try them, sure; but closely examine the results, tear them apart, and try to understand what's really going on.
Regarding specific features you mention (Live Paint, Brush, Eraser), try them, examine the results, and consider whether the results are what you would expect if they'd been deliberately and efficently drawn. I find that Live Paint and Shape Builder (much the same thing) usually do a decent job of maintaining true-ness to the original paths, matching abutting edges which should be exactly identical without creation of many unnecessary anchors.
I find much the opposite to be true of features like Offset Path, Outline Stroke, and even moreso of features like Variable Strokes. Basically anything that involves automated enveloping (not just Envelopes, but also things like ArtBrushes) are suspect. I'm certainly not saying never use them, but be as aware as you can of what's going on. I leverage Artbrushes and Pattern Brushes to high advantage for certain things, but I do so knowingly, not willy-nilly. I rarely ever acutally use the Brush or Pencil or Blob Tools. I create the artwork contained in the Brushes as cleanly as possible and apply the Brush to deliberately-drawn paths.
Much has to do with the intended practical uses of the final artwork. For example, overlapping paths is standard fare for artwork destined for print. It's a functional deal-breaker for artwork that wil also be used to drive a cutter/plotter for signage. (Just one reason why proper logo master files should be as cleanly constructed as possible.)
Automated routines--no matter how seemingly "powerful"--do not have human discernment. The poster-child example of this is autotracing. An autotracing feature doesn't know a round iris from a hex bolt. The autotracing features of mainstream drawing programs don't even have any geometric shape recognition. So with infrequent exceptions, autotracing is overused pointless junk. It just trades one kind of raster-based ugliness (pixelation) for another kind of vector-based ugliness (shapeless jaggedness).
I know...you didn't mention autotracing. But I mention it as an extreme case of a principle that you can apply to the features you did mention: Ask yourself what a purely mathematical algorithm with zero aesthetic discernment is going to yield in terms of what you would consider elegant execution.
Again, I'll cite a well-known extreme: Anyone who has ever had to deal with auto-generated 2D DXF exports from CAD/CAE programs is familiar with the ubiquitous problem of dealing with thousands of tiny disjointed straight segments meant to represent a curve. Those tasked with handling such drudgery deal with it routinely. Some of them even devise additonal automated algorithms to make a bad situation marginally better. Yes, it "gets the job done." Yes, today's computer hardware can process the ridiculous amount of geometrically unnecessary data without choking. Yes, at the scale at which it will be printed in the parts catalog, the faceted shape will not be distractingly noticeable. But no self-respecting technical illustrator would ever actually draw the same subject that way from scratch, and his far more elegantly drawn-from-scratch result would be far more versatile and robust for multiple final uses.
Your bush example is not so complex as to make drawing deliberately and directly with the Pen impractical. In fact, doing so is much less work than the second example using a bunch of ellipses and applying boolean operations. But maybe you stylistically desire each edge of each blade to be a portion of a mathematical ellipse or even strictly circular. In that case, using automated boolean operations may be justified. But (especially in Illustrator) I would be sure to carefully examine the results. Illustrator's automated path generation routines (Pathfinders, Offset Path, Outline Stroke) have been notorious at various times (versions) for generating ugly and sometimes functionally problematic artifacts such as needless coincident anchors (for just one example).
Your second example of the "scratchboard" style illustration is a case-in-point of situations where we make value judgements and (hopefully careful) compromise between semi-automation and path-drawing purism. You're trying to emulate an expressly non-geometric aesthetic style. The particular example is a good one, because it's a "borderline" example. That drawing is simple enough that it could be drawn entirely anchor-by-anchor, and I would likely do it that way if, for example, it was going to be cut from sign vinyl enlarged to the scale of a trade show background or a wall hanging in an airport.
But if it were only to serve as a one-time placement as a spot graphic in a magazine, I might, for example, create an ArtBrush for certain portions of it, like the selected sun rays, and "let it go" for practical considerations. (Although I'd not deliver it as such; I'd consider it a matter of due dilligence to expand such semi-automated "live" onstructs and check the paths for reasonable cleanness.)
Bear in mind, Bezier-based drawing has been the mainstream for three decades now. We're not "fooling anyone" anymore. There now exists a new aesthetic discernment. Even our audiences are well aware that digital emulations of the randomness of so-called "natural media" are just that; contrived digital emulations. Our audiences view our artwork with a certain skepticism.
And when you put something in print, there's (hopefully, although I often wonder) still the matter of professional pride which bears in mind that our artwork will be viewed not by just the "unsuspecting public" but also by our peers; our colleagues. So you want to avoid any "dead giveaways" of execution by "cheap tricks" which "hurt the eyes" of other vector illustrators. At the scale viewed on this computer in this forum, there are details in that drawing which look like (whether they are or not) the kind of unintentional artifacts commonly generated by path operations and such. Such artifacts don't read as "natural randomness" of the emulated medium (again, we're no longer fooling anyone). They break the stylistic consistency of detail of the overall drawing and therefore look like unintentional but disregarded results of some automated feature.
So anytime you employ an automated path-generating feature, consider it normal to perform some cleanup on the result. Again, an extreme-case common situation exemplifies the principle. I put 3D Effect to use, but I would never deliver the raw results of it as final deliverable vector artwork. Automated features can be used as a rough-out tool; a means to an end, not the final end itself.
JET

When to use Paint over Photoshop?

Im newer to Photoshop so its easier for me to throw my images into Paint to resize and crop them.
I was curious if other community members ever use Microsoft Paint for tasks and if so what?
Also, should I be doing this or would it benefit me to use Photoshop for resizing and croping images? I plan on using Photoshop but I rarely have it open since I mostly use the development programs within CS5 and it takes magnitudes longer to open Photoshop than Paint. But even with Fireworks running and the image attended for Fireworks I still through my image into paint because it seems faster. Am I dumb? Should I give up the paint? Some hot keys for this task probably would be better ahhhh... any insight?
Thanks,

I do not think that I have used MS Paint, since about Windows 2.0. I did not even realize that it was still around.
I just use PS for everything, with the exception of JPEG's, with bum header info, that PS will not open. Then, I just use either ThumbsPlus, or IrfanView, to Open, then Save with proper header info.
I do not have any data on the Scaling (Resizing) algorithms in Paint, but would think that those in PS would be better. They do offer you a good range of choices, but maybe Paint has similar? Same when Cropping. What part of those operations do you find easier in Paint?
Though I use PS a lot, and have for a very long time, image editing software is but a tool in a process. Using the right tool, or the one that the artist is most comfortable with, is the trick. I use Painter (now Corel) for a lot of treatments, but almost always finish up in PS. Over the decades, PS has become closer to Painter, than in days past. Still, there are treatments that I want to apply in Painter, and part of those choices will be my personnal comfort level. I might have something very similar in my newer PS, but if I know every step by heart in Painter, my comfort level rises.
Use what you like for different operations, but I would do a visual check with an operation, like Scale/Resize. Do the same exact operation in each program, using the same base Image, and the same exact settings. Compare the results of the two programs critically.
Good luck,
Hunt

How to use paint bucket.

I am trying to change the background color and I USED, to be able to just click on the paint bucket and then click the background with whichever color I wanted.
For some reason when i click nothing happens... Im getting frustrated. blah
Please help.

Something like this:
1. Use the Rectangular Marquee Tool to draw the rectangular selection
2. Select the Paint Bucket Tool
    Add a new blank layer
    (so it's easy to change later)
    Click on the foreground color chip in the toolbox and set your color for the fill
    Click inside the selection with the paint bucket tool
    Select>Deselect
You can use the rulers to see how far an inch is in your document
(View>Rulers)

Using Paint Bucket Fill in Selection puts a 1px line down each side...

I want to fill a selection. I have a simple rectangle path. I make the path a selection and fill it with the paint bucket. I get a line on the left outside the selection:
Then I get a line on the right inside the selection:
There's no line at the top and the bottom of the fill is at the bottom of the image.
This line is only 1px but it's for a web graphic and I am trying to get a pixel-perfect size.
Can anyone tell me why the behaviour and how to avoid it?
Thanks
Martin

Refine Edges box did it for me!
I didn't even know about that. When I had a look it was set to 0% contrast and pushing that up to 100% sorted out the probem for me.
Thank you very much.
Martin
Next on my list is to learn about Shape Layers and Fill Pixels. Does this never end?

When I use paint bucket or brushes there is no colour not even black

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for