When is Solaris 10 update 9 due?

At the beginning of the year there were hints that Solaris 10 update 9 was due in around April/May, as we are now into July 2010.
Is Solaris 10 update 9 due ( or Solaris 11 ) going to arrive before the end of year?

If you are correct and the next release is being delayed until after September (if it October then it will be a year since the last release), will this release be Solaris 11 an actual version upgrade and not Solaris 10 update 9 a back port of technology from OpenSolaris

Similar Messages

  • When firefox checking for updates and updates found but due to proxy restrictions it unable to download the updates then it continue trying to download that and this time it creating problem on running javascript

    When firefox checking for updates and updates found but due to proxy restrictions it unable to download the updates then it continue trying to download that and this time it creating problem on executing javascript and raising errors.

    What are the error messages you are seeing?

  • IPad1 can not install software 4.3.2 update -message due to corrupt backup - but when I go to delete backup there is no backup in device section of itunes - in preferences

    iPad1 can not install software 4.3.2 update - message - due to corrupt backup - but when I go to delete backup there is no backup in the device section of itunes under preferences

    The problem was cured by going to <user>/Library/Application Support/MobileSync/Backup and moving the files from that folder to desktop and the ipad backed up and the software installed

  • When I try to update iTunes to 11.1.0, I can't due to error C2QK82VCDTY3

    My Macbook is updated with the latest version of every software but iTunes. However, when I try to update it, I can't due to error 
    C2QK82VCDTY3. Can anyone help me?
    Thanks,
    Giacomo

    About 70 % of planet Earth is trying to download the same thing at the same time.
    Don’t forget that it is not ONLY Ipad update, .....but also Iphone update too today ....and new Itunes too
    Give it some time.   
    Very heavy traffic on Apple servers right now

  • HT204266 I have some updates due on some Apps I have downloaded but when I try to update I get a message saying that my account is not in the UK store so must switch to Ireland before purchasing. Does anybody know how you change stores?

    I have some updates due on some Apps I have downloaded but when I try to update I get a message saying that my account is not in the UK store so must switch to Ireland before purchasing. Does anybody know how you change stores? I did not do this deliberately!

    Yup! Here:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1311

  • When is the new update due out 5.02

    when is the new update due to 5.2 to sort the battery life out im in the uk  thanks roger

    I'll tell you the day after I download my copy.
    Allan

  • Problem with luactivate procedure in Solaris 10 Update 5

    We are having some issues with Live Upgrade procedures with Solaris 10 Update 5 on SUN Enterprise T5240 servers.
    We have successfully performed those procedures earlier on SUN Fire v240 using Solaris 10 Update 3.
    Here is the problem statement:
    1. Created a Flar image successfully
    2. Installed on a 5240 machine from InstallServer and using jumpstart profile using a sysidcfg and flash_prof
    3. The first installation is successful and system picks up configuration information from sysidcfg file on the install server.
    4. Now we use lucreate to create another BE (Boot Environment) BE_2.
    5. BE_2 is upgraded with luupgrade using the same flar as used in step 2.
    6. Issuing command:
    luactivate -s BE_2
    7. After a init 6, system tries to boot from BE_2. This time instead of copying system files from BE_1 due to -s options specified, it instead runs the sysconfig command that asks for all the configuration options again.
    8. When we were using these steps in Solaris 10 update 3 on Sun Fire v240, everything was working fine. The system config was available in BE_2 without any issue.
    ***************************************************************************************************************************************************

    iMovie10 only works in and exports 16:9 aspect ratio.
    The resolution is set by that of the first video clip put in a project timeline.  To change your project to 1080p do the following:
    Create a new project
    Put any known 1080p video clip in the project (it can be removed later)
    Select the old project and then Edit - Select All then Edit - Copy
    Select the new project and then Edit - Copy
    The new project should now be 1080p.  You can remove the first clip if you want.
    Geoff.

  • Solaris 100 update manager

    After initial installation of solaris 10 and updated system via update manager. I encountered a video card problema nd had to re-install solaris 10, now I am getting an error when I attempt to update solaris 10 update manager
    Error: Patch metadata errors were deleted. Obselesce processing failure. Could not find obselescing update for 127717-01.
    Where have I gone wrong.
    Any assistance will be appreciated.

    I re-installad solaris 10 and during the update I ommitted SMC updates. However, I noticed unique problem after re-installation. I tried to download anotther tool from sun site. It failed due to lack of disk space. I preallocated 32GB drive-space during installation, I later observed that I only had 1.4GIG of disk space remaining. It seems like I should not have preallocated the entire 32gig to solaris 10 during installation, or should I have taken a different approach. A little puzzled right now.
    Thanks a bunch!!

  • New to solaris---is update manager working correctly?

    well as my subject says I am new to solaris having put it on an pc bout a week ago. as I am using the "free" verson (not open solaris) I knew I would not be entitled to certain goodies but seem to have run into an issue getting the updates I (presumably) am entitled to. simply put I open up the solaris application "update manager" which is on my desktop saying "updates available". now upon initially launching the app I specified that I was using the free version (well it let me register without a code so I assume sun knows my status), and then selected the option to put a check mark next to all available updates. well after waiting like a full day with it showing that is was still in the process up updating I eventually aborted the process. I then tried installing a couple of the updates and though it took a while it worked. so I selected 3 of 4 more and again the update manager showed that I was updating but nothing was happening (to my knowledge). after several hours I aborted the app again. so what am I doing wrong. first off I am assuming that what sun presents to me is what is actually available to me using the free unregistered version of solaris. why then would updates fail? btw I know some linux (not an expert) and I figured that behind the scenes update manager was checking for dependencies and installing what I needed from sun repos. but of course I could be way off bass here. so what gives? thanks much in advance.

    first off I am assuming that what sun presents to me is what is actually available to me using the free unregistered version of solaris.No. Update Manager will show you everything but will only allow you to install basically security and a small subset of other patches.
    When you ran through the Solaris registration GUI you had a chance to enter a support contract #. If you chose not to enter one or if you want to use it without registering then you only get access to a few of the patches.
    alan

  • Solaris 10 update 6 keeps generating core file (/core)

    I wonder if somebody has encountered the following issue.
    I did a fresh install of Solaris 10 update 6 on two servers (T5140 and T524) from DVD.
    I noticed that a core file was in the root filesystem (/core).
    So, I deleted it.
    As soon as I delete the core file, another one is generated.
    This is happening on both servers where I installed Solaris 10 update 6 from the DVD.
    This is not a live update install. Solaris was installed from scratch. When prompted to preserve previous data, I replied with 'do not preserve data'
    Does anybody know where the core file is coming from and how to stop it being generated?
    Found out that is coming from vold
    SunOS b1osdtsun02 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5240
    # more /etc/release
                          Solaris 10 10/08 s10s_u6wos_07b SPARC
               Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
                            Use is subject to license terms.
                                Assembled 27 October 2008
    # mdb /core
    Loading modules: [ libsysevent.so.1 libnvpair.so.1 libc.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
    ::statusdebugging core file of vold (32-bit) from b1osdtsun02
    file: /usr/sbin/vold
    initial argv: /usr/sbin/vold -f /etc/vold.conf
    threading model: multi-threaded
    status: process terminated by SIGSEGV (Segmentation Fault)
    ::stacklibc.so.1`strlen+0x18(408450a5, 0, 0, 88b70, 600, 180)
    read_slices+0x114(874a0, b, 889a0, feeafd34, 1, 5)
    read_hsfs_partition+0x88(b, 46c00, 6d0000, 2c, 34400, 1010101)
    read_partition+0x30(874a0, 341a4, 3, 34000, 34400, 9)
    create_top_partition+0x140(7cbe0, 7cc24, 7cbe0, 874a0, ffffffff, b)
    0x265e0(800012, feeaff9c, c, 598e0, 7cbe0, ffffffff)
    create_medium+0x74(800012, feeaff9c, 20, 12, 47800, c)
    0x2232c(5d278, 0, 0, 800012, 20, 33000)
    libc.so.1`_lwp_start(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
    >
    #It seems that vold is failing to mount the DVD on both servers after Solaris was installed.
    Is this a Solaris 10 update 6 bug?
    Edited by: shen on Jan 29, 2009 8:45 PM

    Never mind.
    It is a known bug documented on manual " [Solaris 10 10/08 Release Notes, Chapter 2 Solaris Runtime Issues|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-5245/chapter2-1000?a=view] " as shown below.
    The solution is to apply vold patch [138130-01|http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-138130-01-1].
    Solaris 10 10/08 DVD Media Might Not be Automatically Mounted by vold (6712352)
    The Solaris 10 10/08 DVD does not mount by default during runtime. No error message is displayed.
    Workaround: Perform the following steps:
       1. Become superuser.
       2. Disable vold:
          * On Solaris 10 Systems:
                # svcadm disable -t volfs
          * On Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 systems:
                /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
       3. Mount the media manually by using the # mount -F hsfs path to block device path to mount point command. For example:
          # mount -F hsfs /dev/rdsk/c0t2d0s2 /mnt

  • Unable to regenerate /dev/rmt/0 drivers with cfgadm -c configure on Solaris 10 update 11 (1/13).  How does one do this for SAS HBA StorageTek Autoloader?

    How does one regenerate the /dev/rmt/0 when cfgadm -c configure <device> will not rebuild it?  Have attempted reboot -- -r, with modifing /kernel/drv/st.conf as well as /kernel/drv/sgen.conf.  Running on a SPARC T4-1 Solaris 10 updat3 11, (1/13).

    This has been resolved.  Getting the /etc/driver_aliases set correctly: # update_drv -d -i st; update_drv -d -i sgen; add_drv -m '* 0600 root sys' -i '"scsiclass,01" "scsiclass,08" wa' worked.  Making sure the st and sgen entries are in /etc/name_to_major were needed.  For the Simpana/CommVault WA drivers, in opt/simpana/WA/wa.conf with the name="wa" parent="fp" target=16 lun=0 fc-port-wwn="device's World Wide Number> added for each lun 0 to 7.  Then the touch /reconfigure; reboot worked.  First the c1::rmt/0 tape and c1::scsi/changer/<wwn> med-changer were mapped.  After modifying the minor_perm ('* 0600 root sys') and name_to_major entries, the WA CommValt entries , WA drivers showed up in cfgadm -al as c1::wa0  tape and c1::wa1  med-changer, only recognizable from CommVault.  Also had to update the SAS-2 HBA StoregTek Autoloader driver with patch 145648-05. Solaris 10 update 11 (1/13) comes with 145648-03.  In our particular case, we found cfgadm -al mapped SAS-2 HBA to c1 using the single mini-sas 6gb connector cable, where it mapped to c7 with the four tail connector.

  • Solaris 10 update 9 - live upgrade issues with ZFS

    Hi
    After doing a live upgrade from Solaris 10 update 8 to Solaris 10 update 9 the alternate boot environment I created is no longer bootable.
    I have completed all the pre-upgrade steps like:
    - Installing the latest version of live upgrade from the update 9 ISO.
    - Create and test the new boot environment.
    - Create a sysidcfg file used by the live upgrade that has auto_reg=disable in it.
    There is also no errors while creating the boot environment or even when activating it.
    Here is the error I get:
    SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_14489-06 64-bit
    Copyright (c) 1983, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
    NOTICE: zfs_parse_bootfs: error 22
    Cannot mount root on altroot/37 fstype zfs
    *panic[cpu0]/thread=fffffffffbc28040: vfs mountroot: cannot mount root*
    ffffffffffbc4a8d0 genunix:main+107 ()
    Skipping system dump - no dump device configured
    Does anyone know how I can fix this?
    Edited by: user12099270 on 02-Feb-2011 04:49

    Found the culprit... *142910-17*... breaks it
    System has findroot enabled GRUB
    Updating GRUB menu default setting
    GRUB menu default setting is unaffected
    Saving existing file </boot/grub/menu.lst> in top level dataset for BE <s10x_u8wos_08a> as <mount-point>//boot/grub/menu.lst.prev.
    File </etc/lu/GRUB_backup_menu> propagation successful
    Successfully deleted entry from GRUB menu
    Validating the contents of the media </admin/x86/Patches/10_x86_Recommended/patches>.
    The media contains 204 software patches that can be added.
    Mounting the BE <s10x_u8wos_08a_Jan2011>.
    Adding patches to the BE <s10x_u8wos_08a_Jan2011>.
    Validating patches...
    Loading patches installed on the system...
    Done!
    Loading patches requested to install.
    Done!
    The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
    Package SUNWio-tools from directory SUNWio-tools in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWio-tools will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWzoneu from directory SUNWzoneu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWzoneu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWpsm-ipp from directory SUNWpsm-ipp in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpsm-ipp will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWsshdu from directory SUNWsshdu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsshdu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWsacom from directory SUNWsacom in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsacom will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWmdbr from directory SUNWmdbr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWmdbr will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWopenssl-commands from directory SUNWopenssl-commands in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWopenssl-commands will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWsshdr from directory SUNWsshdr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsshdr will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWsshcu from directory SUNWsshcu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsshcu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWsshu from directory SUNWsshu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsshu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWgrubS from directory SUNWgrubS in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWgrubS will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWzoner from directory SUNWzoner in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWzoner will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWmdb from directory SUNWmdb in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWmdb will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWpool from directory SUNWpool in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpool will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWudfr from directory SUNWudfr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWudfr will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWxcu4 from directory SUNWxcu4 in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWxcu4 will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWarc from directory SUNWarc in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWarc will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWtftp from directory SUNWtftp in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWtftp will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWaccu from directory SUNWaccu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWaccu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWppm from directory SUNWppm in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWppm will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWtoo from directory SUNWtoo in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWtoo will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWcpc from directory SUNWcpc.i in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWcpc will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWftdur from directory SUNWftdur in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWftdur will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWypr from directory SUNWypr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWypr will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWlxr from directory SUNWlxr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWlxr will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWdcar from directory SUNWdcar in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdcar will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWnfssu from directory SUNWnfssu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWnfssu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWpcmem from directory SUNWpcmem in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpcmem will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWlxu from directory SUNWlxu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWlxu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWxcu6 from directory SUNWxcu6 in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWxcu6 will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWpcmci from directory SUNWpcmci in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpcmci will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWarcr from directory SUNWarcr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWarcr will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWscpu from directory SUNWscpu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWscpu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWcpcu from directory SUNWcpcu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWcpcu will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWopenssl-include from directory SUNWopenssl-include in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWopenssl-include will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWdtrp from directory SUNWdtrp in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdtrp will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWhermon from directory SUNWhermon in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWhermon will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWpsm-lpd from directory SUNWpsm-lpd in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpsm-lpd will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWdtrc from directory SUNWdtrc in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdtrc will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWhea from directory SUNWhea in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWhea will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNW1394 from directory SUNW1394 in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNW1394 will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWrds from directory SUNWrds in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWrds will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWnfsskr from directory SUNWnfsskr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWnfsskr will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWudf from directory SUNWudf in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWudf will not be applied to the system.
    Package SUNWixgb from directory SUNWixgb in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWixgb will not be applied to the system.
    Checking patches that you specified for installation.
    Done!
    Approved patches will be installed in this order:
    142910-17
    Checking installed patches...
    Executing prepatch script...
    Installing patch packages...
    Patch 142910-17 has been successfully installed.
    See /a/var/sadm/patch/142910-17/log for details
    Executing postpatch script...
    Creating GRUB menu in /a
    Installing grub on /dev/rdsk/c2t0d0s0
    stage1 written to partition 0 sector 0 (abs 16065)
    stage2 written to partition 0, 273 sectors starting at 50 (abs 16115)
    Patch packages installed:
    BRCMbnx
    SUNWaac
    SUNWahci
    SUNWamd8111s
    SUNWcakr
    SUNWckr
    SUNWcry
    SUNWcryr
    SUNWcsd
    SUNWcsl
    SUNWcslr
    SUNWcsr
    SUNWcsu
    SUNWesu
    SUNWfmd
    SUNWfmdr
    SUNWgrub
    SUNWhxge
    SUNWib
    SUNWigb
    SUNWintgige
    SUNWipoib
    SUNWixgbe
    SUNWmdr
    SUNWmegasas
    SUNWmptsas
    SUNWmrsas
    SUNWmv88sx
    SUNWnfsckr
    SUNWnfscr
    SUNWnfscu
    SUNWnge
    SUNWnisu
    SUNWntxn
    SUNWnv-sata
    SUNWnxge
    SUNWopenssl-libraries
    SUNWos86r
    SUNWpapi
    SUNWpcu
    SUNWpiclu
    SUNWpsdcr
    SUNWpsdir
    SUNWpsu
    SUNWrge
    SUNWrpcib
    SUNWrsgk
    SUNWses
    SUNWsmapi
    SUNWsndmr
    SUNWsndmu
    SUNWtavor
    SUNWudapltu
    SUNWusb
    SUNWxge
    SUNWxvmpv
    SUNWzfskr
    SUNWzfsr
    SUNWzfsu
    PBE GRUB has no capability information.
    PBE GRUB has no versioning information.
    ABE GRUB is newer than PBE GRUB. Updating GRUB.
    GRUB update was successfull.
    Unmounting the BE <s10x_u8wos_08a_Jan2011>.
    The patch add to the BE <s10x_u8wos_08a_Jan2011> completed.
    Still need to know how to resolve it though...

  • Created zone with defaults won't boot completely (Solaris 10, Update 1)

    If I create a zone with defaults, i.e. allowing the zone to inherit the typical package dirs, the resulting zone does not boot completely. When I attach to the zone via zlogin, the zone looks to be in an administrative state. It never boots to a point where one would typically enter in the initial configuration info, e.g. timezone and root password.
    However if I create the zone after first removing the inherited dirs, the zone boots to a state where it subsequently can be confiured and fully booted.
    Looks as if the SMF facilities are not fully initialized when the zone is configured to inherit its packages. This could be a red herring as I'm a newbie who's moved over from Linux and starting to understand SMF specifically and Solaris in general.
    I did not have this problem with Solaris 10. I've just installed Solaris 10 Update 1; the problem seems specific to that installation. I reinstalled and the problem persists.

    I snipped the output because there were some errors, which on retrospect seems to have been a silly decision. I repeated the process and captured the missing output:
    # zoneadm -z foo install
    Preparing to install zone <foo>.
    Creating list of files to copy from the global zone.
    Copying <5913> files to the zone.
    Initializing zone product registry.
    Determining zone package initialization order.
    Preparing to initialize <942> packages on the zone.
    Initialized <942> packages on zone.
    Zone <foo> is initialized.
    Installation of <1> packages was skipped.
    Installation of these packages generated warnings: <SUNWxwfnt
    SUNWxwplt SUNWxwcft SUNWjxmft SUNWxwpls SUNWpmowu
    SUNWxilrl SUNWolrte SUNWi13rf SUNWi15rf SUNWi2rf SUNWi5rf
    SUNWi7rf SUNWi9rf SUNWtxfnt SUNWdoc SUNWi1of SUNWi4rf
    SUNWi8rf SUNW1251f SUNWarrf SUNWxwoft SUNWxwxst
    SUNWkoi8f SUNWasu SUNWxrpcrt SUNWasac SUNWasdb
    SUNWasut>
    The file </zone/foo/root/var/sadm/system/logs/install_log> contains a log of the zone installation.The packages are related to App development and X11. I don't see any that might be related to SMF.
    The logfile is too large to post at over 37K lines. However there seemed to be a pattern to the package failures. Hopefully these greps highlight the important messages:
    # grep "partially failed" /zone/foo/root/var/sadm/system/logs/install_log
    Installation of <SUNWxwfnt> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwplt> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwcft> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWjxmft> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwpls> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWpmowu> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxilrl> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWolrte> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi13rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi15rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi2rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi5rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi7rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi9rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWtxfnt> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWdoc> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi1of> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi4rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi8rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNW1251f> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWarrf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwoft> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwxst> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWkoi8f> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWasu> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxrpcrt> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWasac> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWasdb> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWasut> on zone <foo> partially failed.and# grep "not installed" /zone/foo/root/var/sadm/system/logs/install_log
    *** package <SPROmrdwf> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdwrfb> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROlang> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROlangx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdwrfx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsbld> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsbldx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROrdbkb> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROrdbkx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROcc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROutool> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrcc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrcom> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmr3m> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrtcv> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROm9xs> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsunms> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsmsx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsmpx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrsbe> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsbe> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROpnsn> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROfd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROupdck> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROcpl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROcplx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROcmpl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtlbn7> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtll7> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtl7x> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtll7x> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROscl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsclx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrstd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrcpl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4h> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4a> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4o> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4x> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4y> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROftool> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROl90> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROl90x> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROl90s> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROl90sx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROf90> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrftn> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROgc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROlgc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROgcx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROlgcx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdbx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdbxx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjdbx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjdbxx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrdbx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdemo> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdmake> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrdmk> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtdemo> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmride> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdbxui> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsvc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROxdplg> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROidext> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjnsnb> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjnsrt> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjnsup> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROctags> was not installed:
    *** package <SUNWnbide> was not installed:
    *** package <SUNWnbcpp> was not installed:
    *** package <SUJAnbcpp> was not installed:
    *** package <SUZHnbcpp> was not installed:
    *** package <SUNWexted> was not installed:
    *** package <SUJAexted> was not installed:
    *** package <SUZHexted> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROnbreg> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROfdxd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrxd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROgvim> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROxmbin> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROxmshr> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROxmsrc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrxm> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprfan> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrpan> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprfax> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprflb> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprflx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprfgn> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrpgn> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROhtbas> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROhttl7> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROhtstd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROhtxd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdwrfs> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROrdbks> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROctsrc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROplg> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROpl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROplx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROpls> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROplsx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrpl> was not installed:These messages seem to be inline with the general output captured from the zone install itself.
    > What does "svcadm list -vc" give you when you started the zone ?
    I took that as a typo, instead using "zoneadm?"
    # zoneadm list -vc
      ID NAME             STATUS         PATH
       0 global           running        /
       7 foo              running        /zone/fooThe zone is not on its own slice, however "/zone" is mounted as a loopback from /export/zone. I don't think that's a problem since the zone install seems to work if I don't inherit packages. Unless perhaps its a nesting level of lofs's.
    FWIW,
    # mount |grep zone
    /zone on /export/zone read/write/setuid/devices/dev=1540000 on Fri Feb 24 16:10:55 2006
    /zone/foo/root/dev on /zone/foo/dev read/write/setuid/devices/zonedevfs/dev=4640007 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/lib on /lib read only/setuid/nodevices/nosub/dev=dc0440 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/platform on /platform read only/setuid/nodevices/nosub/dev=dc0440 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/sbin on /sbin read only/setuid/nodevices/nosub/dev=dc0440 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/usr on /usr read only/setuid/nodevices/nosub/dev=dc0440 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/proc on proc read/write/setuid/nodevices/zone=foo/dev=4400007 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:06 2006
    /zone/foo/root/system/contract on ctfs read/write/setuid/nodevices/zone=foo/dev=43c0008 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:06 2006
    /zone/foo/root/etc/svc/volatile on swap read/write/setuid/nodevices/xattr/zone=foo/dev=448000e on Tue Feb 28 13:13:06 2006
    /zone/foo/root/etc/mnttab on mnttab read/write/setuid/nodevices/zone=foo/dev=4440008 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:06 2006

  • Help only displays the frame in Solaris 10, update 6

    I have a help application that has been running fine since Solaris 8. It works in Solaris 10, update 1, but not in update 6. Only an empty help frame is displayed. My JRE is 1.6.0_05-b13, and I am using help 1.1.13. I suspect that replacing the default HelpUI with my own subclass has stopped working. My application has this line of code which is used to replace the default HelpUI:
    UIManager.getDefaults().put("HelpUI", "HelpUIWithClose");
    The users wanted a close button, so HelpUIWithClose is subclassed from BasicHelpUI, and a big close button is added on the toolbar. This has been working for years. Before and after this line of code are two print statements that get the toString value of the UIDefaults HelpUI object. The results are:
    (before)
    javax.help.plaf.basic.BasicHelpUI
    (after)
    HelpUIWithClose
    I am only guessing at the problem because of all of the "Unknown Source" values in the trace below. If I comment out the UIManager line above that replaces HelpUI with HelpUIWithClose, the help functions normally, but of course it is missing the close button added by HelpUIWithClose.
    An alternate question might be how to add a close button to the toolbar of help?
    I get a very long trace when this fails. I will post it at the end of this email. Any ideas on what is wrong?
    Thanks,
    Herb Miller
    UIDefaults.getUI() failed: no ComponentUI class for: javax.help.JHelp[,0,0,0x0,invalid,alignmentX=0.0,alignmentY=0.0,border=,flags=0,maximumSize=,minimumSize=,preferredSize=]
    java.lang.Error
    at javax.swing.UIDefaults.getUIError(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.MultiUIDefaults.getUIError(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.UIDefaults.getUI(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.UIManager.getUI(Unknown Source)
    at javax.help.JHelp.updateUI(JHelp.java:299)
    at javax.help.JHelp.<init>(JHelp.java:121)
    at javax.help.WindowPresentation.createJHelp(WindowPresentation.java:843)
    at javax.help.WindowPresentation.createHelpWindow(WindowPresentation.java:879)
    at javax.help.WindowPresentation.setDisplayed(WindowPresentation.java:346)
    at javax.help.DefaultHelpBroker.setDisplayed(DefaultHelpBroker.java:178)
    at javax.help.CSH.displayHelp(CSH.java:749)
    at javax.help.CSH.access$200(CSH.java:80)
    at javax.help.CSH$DisplayHelpFromSource.actionPerformed(CSH.java:1668)
    at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.AbstractButton.doClick(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicMenuItemUI.doClick(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicMenuItemUI$Handler.mouseReleased(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
    at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)

    Never mind.
    It is a known bug documented on manual " [Solaris 10 10/08 Release Notes, Chapter 2 Solaris Runtime Issues|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-5245/chapter2-1000?a=view] " as shown below.
    The solution is to apply vold patch [138130-01|http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-138130-01-1].
    Solaris 10 10/08 DVD Media Might Not be Automatically Mounted by vold (6712352)
    The Solaris 10 10/08 DVD does not mount by default during runtime. No error message is displayed.
    Workaround: Perform the following steps:
       1. Become superuser.
       2. Disable vold:
          * On Solaris 10 Systems:
                # svcadm disable -t volfs
          * On Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 systems:
                /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
       3. Mount the media manually by using the # mount -F hsfs path to block device path to mount point command. For example:
          # mount -F hsfs /dev/rdsk/c0t2d0s2 /mnt

  • Upgrading from Solaris 10 Update 2 to Update 7 (05/09) on V125

    I am trying to upgrade a V125 from Solaris 10 Update 2 to Solaris 10 Update 7. When the installer runs, it does not give me a choice for upgrading. I have tried also using text mode (boot cdrom - text) with no luck. Anyone else run into this?
    Best!
    Frank

    You should update all the way to 10.5.8 using the combo updater, which you can download from here:
    http://support.apple.com/downloads/MacOS_X_10_5_8_ComboUpdate
    Do I have to buy iLife 09 outright?
    Yes.
    Can I buy just iMovie 09?
    Nope!
    Lastly, you have plenty of RAM. The only way to increase this would be to sell your two ram sticks on eBay and buy two new 2GB sticks.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Link to download Sql Server 2012 "Standard Edition"

    We have purchased Sql Server 2012 "Standard" edition license. Looking for the link to download of installation software for 2012 "Standard" edition. Have tried a lot but could only found - the "enterprise" evaluation copy. Looking for urgent help on

  • Search in Java

    Hi, i want to create a search facility in java. What I want is to have a facility of entering a word to search(it will read a dictionary). and secondly I want the user to be able to click on a letter so that all the corresponding words appear. for ex

  • Loud grating noise and automatic shutting down

    I was writing on a blog and had created a new Wordpress page. I had not written any title nor had put any content in the body either. I chose "Pending" instead of "Draft" and went away for ten minutes. The problem I have had with Wordpress is that it

  • Error in Recordset Bindings operation

    When I try to create a recordset in ASP/VBScript using Dreamweaver CS4, it is creating an empty commandtext string. As a result, when I try to view tables in that recordset, I get the following error: Datasources Error Invalid SQL statement; expected

  • XI R2 Webi Ranking with the SDK

    Hi all, Using the default universe eFashion I get an java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException. The code is very simple (attached to the message). private static void addRankCondition(DocumentInstance iDocInstance, Podium iPodium, int iSize,