When making adjustments with lens correction, the crop isnt contrained to the image

When I first installed CC I was able to rotate, or adjust the image in lens correction and it would automatically crop to the available image dimensions.
But I deselected the contrain to image section in crop mode, and since then it hasnt work, even though contrain to image in crop tool has since been re-selected, many times.
Any idea whats wrong?

Thanks!  All of my shots for this current interior shoot are panoramic.  At a halt until I can resolve this.
Lightroom: 5.7
camera Raw 8.7
Photoshop CC  2014.2.2 Release / 20141204.r.310 x64
Other notes:
- converted arw sony raw (from a6000) into dng and still no results.

Similar Messages

  • "Create new versions when making adjustments" - Lion, Aperture 3.1.3

    I recently upgraded to Lion, and then shortly thereafter to Aperture 3.1.3.
    While I don't seem to share everybody else's issues with Lion nor with Aperture, I do have one of my own.
    In Preferences -> Advanced, I have a box titled "Create new versiont when making adjustment."  It is checked.
    My expectation, (and the way things have always worked under Snow Leopard) is that if I select a master image and begin to make adjustments to it from _any_ feature int he adjustments pallette, that I new version will be created, stacked next to the original, and that the changes I am making will be made to the new version.  This is _not_ what is happening.
    Instead, the changes are applied directly to the master image.  This is annoying, and will probably be fixed in an update...    I thought the work around would be to manually create the version for the time being, until Apple sorts this out.  That didn't work either.
    If I manually create a version, and then proceed to make adjustments to the version, Aperture dows what I would have expected in the first place.  It creates a new version and applies the changes to that.
    For example, I right click on a master image and select "New Version form Master"  A new version, titled "... - Version 2" is created.  When I begin to modify Version 2, a new version is created titled "... - Version 3" and my changes are applied to this version... leaving me with the master and Version 2 which are now duplicates of each other.
    Even more interesting is this:
    Images that were imported into Aperture prior to the Lion upgrade, and the 3.1.3 patch behave as expected, in that a new version is created when adjustments are applied to a master image.
    Images that were imported into Aperture _after_ the upgrade to Lion and the 3.1.3 patch act as describd above, in that no new version is created when adjustments are applied to a master image.
    So...  Here are the questions:
    1. Is anybody else experiencing this?
    2. Does anybody know how to restore the correct behavior?

    Alright,   I have solved the problem.
    Some time ago, I thought it might be neat to import pictures with the Auto Exposure adjustment in place.  What I didn't realize was that if the master image is in the library with adjustments on it, it downs't create a new version when you add additional adjustments.
    As soon as I disabled that, and imported some new imges the probelm went away.
    Also... I went back to the six or seven project that I had imported while use Auto Exposure and removed that adjustment from those images...  
    All is resolved.

  • Support for DNG files with lens corrections?

    Aperture 3.0.1 with the RAW Compatibility Update 3.1 now supports the lens corrections in my Olympus E-P1's native RAW format. yay!
    unfortunately, since Aperture didn't support the camera for six months, I began a switch to Lightroom. consequently, I now have several thousand images that have been converted from the EP-1's native RAW format (ORF) to Adobe's so-called open RAW format (DNG). these DNGs don't load in Aperture (RAW format unsupported errors) because Aperture doesn't support DNGs with lens corrections.
    Apple, can you please advise if lens corrections you support in native RAW files will also be supported in DNG conversions sometime soon? if so, I'll know it's safe to switch back to Aperture and recover the last six months of photos when the next RAW Compatibility Update happens.

    Aperture 3.0.1 with the RAW Compatibility Update 3.1 does not support lens corrections. If you want lens corrections in Aperture you have to use Plugins like PTlens.
    To my knowledge Aperture ignores all lens correction data in the original RAW files, just like it does with all the settings of the camera.

  • Preference to "Create New Versions when making adjustments"

    Isnt the option in Preferences "create new version when making adjustments" seem irrelevant when Ap doesnt touch the original (master) anyway? How is this option intended to be used? Most of the imags for me would be slight tweeks so I wouldnt necessarily want every one of those showing as a 'full new version'.

    yeh, that would seem logical wouldn't it - to create a new version for each session... but that's not what happens.
    i mostly use the HUD and don't close between adjustments but i do sometimes use the side panel which i also don't hide/close between adjustments. i can't remember whether making adjustments via the side panel creates new versions for every adjustment, certainly this behaviour happens when i use the HUD and i'm fairly sure i would have tried the side panel to avoid this annoying behaviour but i can't say for sure and will have to test the side panel behaviour next week if i get time.
    even with the preference for 'create new versions' turned off, there seem to be certain images that always create a new version when i make an adjustment - whether using the HUD or side panel. I haven't figured out an exact pattern to this but it seems to be something to do with those files that have been 'sent to external editor'. subsequent adjustments within aperture always create a new version - haven't a clue why...
    just as an aside, sometimes when i make adjustments (particularly sharpening or noise reduction) i get single pixel wide horizontal lines of noise appearing across my images, which are there when i print or export too, not just screen artifacts due to a badly processed preview...hmmm...anyone else noticed this or has found a post about ways to avoid this?
    all that said, aperture is a godsend for my workflow
    MacBook 2.0 White   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Create new versions when making adjustments?

    Hi,
    What does anyone suggest this setting should be set to? It's on the Advanced Tab in Preferences.
    I think it was un checked when I installed the Trial Version.
    The help file stated the following:-
    +Create new versions when making adjustments” checkbox: Select this checkbox to have Aperture automatically create a new version when you adjust a selected image. The adjustment is applied to the original version and the new one is left untouched.+
    So when I edit an image the the software makes a copy and the original is altered? What happens if it's left un checked?
    Any help on the whole editing thing would be gratefully received.

    This is just a way to automatically create a new version when you make an adjustment. The new version is stacked with an unaltered version, allowing you to quickly see them side by side. What you have to remember is that the *original file is never altered*. This is all virtual. What is called original in this case is in fact an original version, not the actual file. The actual file is called the Master. Very important to understand the distinction.
    I personally leave this off. I never use RAW files without adjustments so there's no point in keeping an unaltered version around, plus it tends to quickly multiply versions and just creates clutter. If I want to see the original file I just hit M (this is the default command key for Show Master). Hit M again and I'm back to my version. If I've created a version and want to do a new different looking one starting from scratch, I can select New Version From Master: presto a new "original"!
    If I've worked on a picture and want to create a BW version, chances are I want to keep the work I've already done as a starting point. In that case I select Duplicate Version and do my BW on the new version. Again, I'm never actually duplicating files and I'm never actually altering pixels, original or otherwise. This is all a set of xml instructions that Aperture applies when it displays the files.
    Helping?
    Message was edited by: Jade Leary

  • When making a phone call on my iphone I can hear the person that i am calling but they can not hear me

    when making a phone call on my iphone,I can hear the person that I am calling but they can not hear my voice

    My first new iphone4 was received and installed complete.
    Nothing to hear when i was calling, only when I used loudspeaker.
    complete reset and reprogrammed Iphone, same result.
    Called Apple support and received a new Iphone4 next day.
    Updated and programmed.
    It works.
    2 weeks ago My son's iphone4, same problem, could only call with loudspeaker??
    Anyone an Idea.

  • ICloud deletes the contacts and calendar entries from Outlook 2010 on my PC, when it syncs. with my iPad. How do I retain the contacts and calendar entries on my PC.

    iCloud deletes the contacts and calendar entries from Outlook 2010 on my PC, when it syncs. with my iPad. How do I retain the contacts and calendar entries on my PC.

    I should mention that i have NOT upgraded to iOS 5 on the 3GS and don't want to.  Therefore, no iCloud on the phone.

  • Please incorporate the Crop & Erase facilities on Bitmap Images in the upcoming version of ai CS7

    Please incorporate the Crop & Erase facilities on Bitmap Images in the upcoming version of Illustrator CS7.

    At first I was for Illustrator to have a page layout capability and made a feature request to that regard then I obtain Quark and came to the forum and thought well I have that capability and then I realized there were other users that needed Illustrator for layouts and so I backed users like Gary Newman who as i recalled were for multiple pages in Illustrator but I was against making Illustrator a page layout application since it was not designed for it but thought it should have a page making tool but thought it should be one that offer multiple size pages or if you wish multiple size documents within a document.
    When they introduce artboards I pointed out that this tooll offered the possibility for a multiple page capability that was more than just pages since you could make pages or if you prefer different size doicuments within one document and then suggest the ability to ba able to name the artboards, like Letterhead, Envelope, Business Card, Mailing Label etc abnd the ability to rearrange them at the moment my most recent suggestion is Master Artboards.
    The reason for artboards instead of just a page layout mechanism is one that already exist in ID and two the user of illustrator are artist that Illustrate or work with Illustration or artwork that is often used with ext and photos but are not necessarily page layout designers andmore than likely would employ the use of text to work with a specific Illustration or group of illustrations where the text and art might be integrated as a work into itself as opposed to an element on a page and that might often be the end design of that page. Such as a childrens book!
    I was never opposed to the feature of being able to output pages from Illustrator I am opposed to amking it a page layout application and now tith the Cloud which will give Adobe the opportunity to build a modular suite of creation tools it will be even less necessary, the Multiple art feature will develop in my opinion and will include supoport for die cutting as well as packaging tools. Those tools will relate to Illustrator and may eventually give way to a new way to cross application tools.
    The Future is coming soon at a Cloud near you, soon is like ten years or so.

  • How do i crop "out" a piece of image=ex: how it will look when its cut for a window. Crop a white space in image?

    How do i crop "out" a piece of image=ex: how it will look when its cut for a window. Crop a white space in image?

    I think this will help if you are using version 11 or 12.
    Make a selection with a selection tool of the area you want to remove.
    Example: rectangular marquee tool - make a rectangle.
    Use Select>Refine Edge:
    Use the View section of this dialog box to see a few views.
    If you need to refine the edge of the selection (smooth, feather, shift, etc.) you can do that in this dialog box.
    You may want to check the box about remembering your settings in case you need to come back to them.
    In the Output section, you can pick New Layer with Layer Mask and click OK.
    You should see the hole in your image.
    Kathy Keith
    @kathleenmadeline on Instagram
    (I teach Photoshop Elements classes)

  • Hello, my name is Todd, I recently dowloaded PS CC 2014. I have used PS for decades. The crop tool will show the progress bar, then at about 25% it will totally stop. What can I do? Thanks

    Hello, my name is Todd, I recently dowloaded PS CC 2014. I have used PS for decades. The crop tool will show the progress bar, then at about 25% it will totally stop, even on VERY small 72dpi images. What can I do? Thanks!

    Double check all the settings in the crop tool, and make sure you aren't telling it to create a HUGE image as a result of your settings.

  • I'm trying to crop individual frames. Can this be done without the crop being applied to the entire clip? Using imovie 11

    I'm trying to crop individual frames. Can this be done without the crop being applied to the entire clip? Using imovie 11

    use the cmd-B(lade) command to split your single clip into individual ones

  • Auto scale/crop with lens correction tool in Camera Raw 8.4

    Does anyone know if this type of functionality exists in Camera Raw 8.4 similar to the Auto scale function in the lens correction filter? I understand the straighten tool offers this effect but I'm looking for in auto crop or autoscale feature when using the lens correction tool. Thanks in advance!

    Good day!
    I notice no difference to prior to 8.4.
    But maybe the ACR Forum may be a better place for questions realted to ACR.
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/cameraraw
    Regards,
    Pfaffenbichler

  • Do the lens corrections consider cropped sensors?

    I tried using the supplied lens corrections for my Canon 70-200 2.8 with pictures from a 1DIIN (1.3X crop factor).  I'm getting far too much corner vignetting correction by default and more distortion correction than necessary.  Are the corrections defined only for full-frame cameras?

    Actually I remove two data sets, which for f/1.4 and f/2.0, both are in same distance.
    Note that, the original profile was created with 2 different distances.
    So, I leave another distance set for correction module for interpolation.
    And the problem found on the photo which around f/2.0.
    But how the profile was generate, it may be my fault,
    since I use too high shutter speed with my room fluorescent, the light source.
    The flicker of the light may lead the optimazer to confusing.
    I also observe that the distance reading from metadata record by the camera, with Lightroom,
    was not corelate with the distance shown in the generated profile.
    I'm not sure what the measurement unit, the profile used, but it should be meter.
    For example:
    I shooting at around 2 meters away from the chart, which close to the number in metadata.
    But the FocusDistance in the profile is 11 meter.

  • Something Strange with Lens Corrections

    I used lens correction on an virtual copy of a DNG image. The image is of a building and I used a slight negative rotation to correct the perspective. After editing the image in LR3, I exported it to PS CS5 with the LR edits. So far so good. After some minor edits in PS I saved the edited PSD file and it shows up in LR. Still good. The problem occurs when I make a virtual copy of the PSD file in LR. Everything looks the same EXCEPT the lens correction seemingly reverts back to the original raw file.The crop that was part of the original lens correction is retained, but not the rotation. What is even stranger, this anomaly becomes apparent as soon as the virtual copy is created in the Library Module, but if I go to the Develop Module with the PSD virtual copy and select the BEFORE & AFTER view, the correct lens angle appears in the BEFORE and the skewed angle for the AFTER. I have tried everything I can think of and cannot figure out if it is me or the program. Any ideas?

    As I try to replicate the problem, it the "unstraightening" seems to occur when I do the export, with LR adjustments. It appears that PS CS5 is retaining some of the settings from LR3, but not all. The crop remains (which is why I thought the image was initially OK back in LR), but the Lens Correction is reset. I just did a search and found that other people have been experiencing similar problems LR3 edits not being retained after working through the external editor. The thread I found (http://forums.adobe.com/message/2891636) did say that manually saving the XMP file is a work around, which I will try when I have time later. Thanks for all your input yesterday! I will report on what I find out.

  • Lens Correction and Cropped Pixels

    I'm starting out as an architectural photographer, and as I don't yet have a perspective correcting lens to adjust images in-camera, I need to use the Lens Correction tools in Photoshop and ACR.  I prefer to use them over the Free Transform tool for the sake of accuracy (and convenience), but I do have an issue with the tools.  When I correct the perspective of an image and then process, whatever extends beyond the boundary of the canvas winds up being automatically deleted, and it seems as if there's no setting to prevent this from happening.  As there is sometimes a piece of a photo that I would like to be able to retain (i.e. extra sky, the top of a building, etc.), I understand that I can scale down the image in the Lens Correction tool and then re-crop after processing.  Of course then this causes the image to still be smaller than I would like it to be (in certain cases where the distortion correction is more extreme, an original 21MP photo might become a 12 or 13MP photo after processing in the Lens Correction due to scale-down).
    Is there any way that the Lens Correction tool will allow for pixels extending beyond the boundaries of the canvas to remain uncropped, thus allowing me to expand the canvas in order to reclaim the extra information?

    Yammer P, yes the list is shorter because it's a jpeg rather than raw, and we have more profiles for raw than for jpeg.
    For the set of lenses supported in CS5's initial release, we created profiles for both raw and jpeg. Since then, we have been concentrating on raw-based lens profiles, for a number of reasons (one of which is that we feel we can consistently deliver the highest quality results this way). This is why you see some lenses supported with raw & jpeg profiles, but many more supported with raw only.
    CS5's Lens Correction plug-in does indeed let you choose raw-based lens profiles even though it is processing a rendered file (e.g., jpeg, tiff). This will work in many (but not all) cases for distortion correction, but will often work poorly for chromatic aberration and vignette correction. I don't recommend this workflow and it is a key reason we don't let users mix/match in ACR & LR.
    Eric

Maybe you are looking for