When SUN issues solaris 10 update 4?

I'am waiting for...

Don't hold you breath since the rumors are 7/07 and it then most likely will be released to month after when it leaves the testbed in one piece.

Similar Messages

When i was trying to update my iPhone 5s to the latest version of ios 8.1 , it required more space so i had to delete data manually, meanwhile i was doing so the phone got stuck and went off & when it came on again i found it on the recovery mode ??

hello there everyone
I lost everything cause I wanted to update my phone
here is what happened with me exactly :-
I plugged in my phone into the charger & connected my phone to a wireless connection to start the operation of updating it, I immediately noticed that I dont have the required space to proceed the download so i had to delete data manually, & meanwhile i was doing so my phone became slow and it got stuck then it went off after that it came on again but it was on the recovery mode ??
did I lose everything ??? what did I do wrong ??? what can i do to recover this ??

Hi, Milanista5
Thank you for visiting Apple Support Communities.
When experiencing issues restoring or updating an iPhone, here are the best articles to go through. If you received a specific error number when restoring, see the section labeled Get more help in the second article below.
iOS: Unable to update or restore
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1808
iOS: Troubleshooting update and restore issues
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1275
Cheers,
Jason H.

When is the next ios update and will it fix/address the issue with photos not being shown in chronilogical order?

when is the next ios update and will it fix/address the issue with photos not being shown in chronological order?

All of us here are users just like you. We have no inside info of when Apple products or operating system updates/upgrades will be released. The next iOS may not even change the issue you have.
 Cheers, Tom

Solaris 10 update 9 - live upgrade issues with ZFS

Hi
After doing a live upgrade from Solaris 10 update 8 to Solaris 10 update 9 the alternate boot environment I created is no longer bootable.
I have completed all the pre-upgrade steps like:
- Installing the latest version of live upgrade from the update 9 ISO.
- Create and test the new boot environment.
- Create a sysidcfg file used by the live upgrade that has auto_reg=disable in it.
There is also no errors while creating the boot environment or even when activating it.
Here is the error I get:
SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_14489-06 64-bit
Copyright (c) 1983, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
NOTICE: zfs_parse_bootfs: error 22
Cannot mount root on altroot/37 fstype zfs
*panic[cpu0]/thread=fffffffffbc28040: vfs mountroot: cannot mount root*
ffffffffffbc4a8d0 genunix:main+107 ()
Skipping system dump - no dump device configured
Does anyone know how I can fix this?
Edited by: user12099270 on 02-Feb-2011 04:49

Found the culprit... *142910-17*... breaks it
System has findroot enabled GRUB
Updating GRUB menu default setting
GRUB menu default setting is unaffected
Saving existing file </boot/grub/menu.lst> in top level dataset for BE <s10x_u8wos_08a> as <mount-point>//boot/grub/menu.lst.prev.
File </etc/lu/GRUB_backup_menu> propagation successful
Successfully deleted entry from GRUB menu
Validating the contents of the media </admin/x86/Patches/10_x86_Recommended/patches>.
The media contains 204 software patches that can be added.
Mounting the BE <s10x_u8wos_08a_Jan2011>.
Adding patches to the BE <s10x_u8wos_08a_Jan2011>.
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Done!
The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
Package SUNWio-tools from directory SUNWio-tools in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWio-tools will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWzoneu from directory SUNWzoneu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWzoneu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWpsm-ipp from directory SUNWpsm-ipp in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpsm-ipp will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWsshdu from directory SUNWsshdu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsshdu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWsacom from directory SUNWsacom in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsacom will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWmdbr from directory SUNWmdbr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWmdbr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWopenssl-commands from directory SUNWopenssl-commands in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWopenssl-commands will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWsshdr from directory SUNWsshdr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsshdr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWsshcu from directory SUNWsshcu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsshcu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWsshu from directory SUNWsshu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsshu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWgrubS from directory SUNWgrubS in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWgrubS will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWzoner from directory SUNWzoner in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWzoner will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWmdb from directory SUNWmdb in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWmdb will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWpool from directory SUNWpool in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpool will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWudfr from directory SUNWudfr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWudfr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWxcu4 from directory SUNWxcu4 in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWxcu4 will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWarc from directory SUNWarc in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWarc will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWtftp from directory SUNWtftp in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWtftp will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWaccu from directory SUNWaccu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWaccu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWppm from directory SUNWppm in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWppm will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWtoo from directory SUNWtoo in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWtoo will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWcpc from directory SUNWcpc.i in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWcpc will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWftdur from directory SUNWftdur in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWftdur will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWypr from directory SUNWypr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWypr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWlxr from directory SUNWlxr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWlxr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdcar from directory SUNWdcar in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdcar will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWnfssu from directory SUNWnfssu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWnfssu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWpcmem from directory SUNWpcmem in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpcmem will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWlxu from directory SUNWlxu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWlxu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWxcu6 from directory SUNWxcu6 in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWxcu6 will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWpcmci from directory SUNWpcmci in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpcmci will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWarcr from directory SUNWarcr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWarcr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWscpu from directory SUNWscpu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWscpu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWcpcu from directory SUNWcpcu in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWcpcu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWopenssl-include from directory SUNWopenssl-include in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWopenssl-include will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdtrp from directory SUNWdtrp in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdtrp will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWhermon from directory SUNWhermon in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWhermon will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWpsm-lpd from directory SUNWpsm-lpd in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpsm-lpd will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdtrc from directory SUNWdtrc in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdtrc will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWhea from directory SUNWhea in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWhea will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNW1394 from directory SUNW1394 in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNW1394 will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWrds from directory SUNWrds in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWrds will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWnfsskr from directory SUNWnfsskr in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWnfsskr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWudf from directory SUNWudf in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWudf will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWixgb from directory SUNWixgb in patch 142910-17 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWixgb will not be applied to the system.
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
Approved patches will be installed in this order:
142910-17
Checking installed patches...
Executing prepatch script...
Installing patch packages...
Patch 142910-17 has been successfully installed.
See /a/var/sadm/patch/142910-17/log for details
Executing postpatch script...
Creating GRUB menu in /a
Installing grub on /dev/rdsk/c2t0d0s0
stage1 written to partition 0 sector 0 (abs 16065)
stage2 written to partition 0, 273 sectors starting at 50 (abs 16115)
Patch packages installed:
BRCMbnx
SUNWaac
SUNWahci
SUNWamd8111s
SUNWcakr
SUNWckr
SUNWcry
SUNWcryr
SUNWcsd
SUNWcsl
SUNWcslr
SUNWcsr
SUNWcsu
SUNWesu
SUNWfmd
SUNWfmdr
SUNWgrub
SUNWhxge
SUNWib
SUNWigb
SUNWintgige
SUNWipoib
SUNWixgbe
SUNWmdr
SUNWmegasas
SUNWmptsas
SUNWmrsas
SUNWmv88sx
SUNWnfsckr
SUNWnfscr
SUNWnfscu
SUNWnge
SUNWnisu
SUNWntxn
SUNWnv-sata
SUNWnxge
SUNWopenssl-libraries
SUNWos86r
SUNWpapi
SUNWpcu
SUNWpiclu
SUNWpsdcr
SUNWpsdir
SUNWpsu
SUNWrge
SUNWrpcib
SUNWrsgk
SUNWses
SUNWsmapi
SUNWsndmr
SUNWsndmu
SUNWtavor
SUNWudapltu
SUNWusb
SUNWxge
SUNWxvmpv
SUNWzfskr
SUNWzfsr
SUNWzfsu
PBE GRUB has no capability information.
PBE GRUB has no versioning information.
ABE GRUB is newer than PBE GRUB. Updating GRUB.
GRUB update was successfull.
Unmounting the BE <s10x_u8wos_08a_Jan2011>.
The patch add to the BE <s10x_u8wos_08a_Jan2011> completed.
Still need to know how to resolve it though...

My iphone 5 has not prompted me for a software update since ios7.04. When i search for an update it tell me "unable to check for update" anyone have this issue?

my iphone 5 has not prompted me for a software update since ios7.04. When i search for an update it tell me "unable to check for update" anyone have this issue?

my ipod is not the newest update possible as i said i tried to update but it wouldnt let me as it wont let me on wifi sources such as safari facebook and other apps which use wifi.all the apps are fully updated

Sun Cluster 3.0 update 1 on Solaris 8 - panics!

I am building a test system in our lab on admittedly unsupported hardware configurations but the failure wasn't expected to be so dramatic. Setup as follows:
2x E250 (single processor, 512 MB RAM)
dual connected to D1000 fully populated 18 Gb HDD
Solaris 8 6/00 with all latest recommended patches
Sun Cluster 3.0 update 1 installed with latest patches.
On first reboot (on either node), the kernel panics with the following:
panic[cpu0]/thread=3000132c320: segkp_fault: accessing redzone
This happens straight after the system sets up the network and happens like that everytime and is easily reproduceable. My question is, has anyone successfully used SC3.0 update 1 on Solaris 8 6/00? Any information would be most appreciated.
-chris.

We have the same problem with 2 SUN E420 and a D1000 storage array.
The problem is releted to the settings on the file :
/etc/system
added by the cluster installation :
set rpcmod:svc_default_stksize=0x4000
set ge:ge_intr_mode=0x833
the second one line try to set a Gigabit Ethernet Interface that does not exist.
We comment out the two line and every things work fine.
I'm interesting to know what you think about Sun Cluster 3.0. and your experience.
email : [email protected]
Stefano

When is Solaris 10 update 9 due?

At the beginning of the year there were hints that Solaris 10 update 9 was due in around April/May, as we are now into July 2010.
Is Solaris 10 update 9 due ( or Solaris 11 ) going to arrive before the end of year?

If you are correct and the next release is being delayed until after September (if it October then it will be a year since the last release), will this release be Solaris 11 an actual version upgrade and not Solaris 10 update 9 a back port of technology from OpenSolaris

New to solaris---is update manager working correctly?

well as my subject says I am new to solaris having put it on an pc bout a week ago. as I am using the "free" verson (not open solaris) I knew I would not be entitled to certain goodies but seem to have run into an issue getting the updates I (presumably) am entitled to. simply put I open up the solaris application "update manager" which is on my desktop saying "updates available". now upon initially launching the app I specified that I was using the free version (well it let me register without a code so I assume sun knows my status), and then selected the option to put a check mark next to all available updates. well after waiting like a full day with it showing that is was still in the process up updating I eventually aborted the process. I then tried installing a couple of the updates and though it took a while it worked. so I selected 3 of 4 more and again the update manager showed that I was updating but nothing was happening (to my knowledge). after several hours I aborted the app again. so what am I doing wrong. first off I am assuming that what sun presents to me is what is actually available to me using the free unregistered version of solaris. why then would updates fail? btw I know some linux (not an expert) and I figured that behind the scenes update manager was checking for dependencies and installing what I needed from sun repos. but of course I could be way off bass here. so what gives? thanks much in advance.

first off I am assuming that what sun presents to me is what is actually available to me using the free unregistered version of solaris.No. Update Manager will show you everything but will only allow you to install basically security and a small subset of other patches.
When you ran through the Solaris registration GUI you had a chance to enter a support contract #. If you chose not to enter one or if you want to use it without registering then you only get access to a few of the patches.
alan

Problem with luactivate procedure in Solaris 10 Update 5

We are having some issues with Live Upgrade procedures with Solaris 10 Update 5 on SUN Enterprise T5240 servers.
We have successfully performed those procedures earlier on SUN Fire v240 using Solaris 10 Update 3.
Here is the problem statement:
1. Created a Flar image successfully
2. Installed on a 5240 machine from InstallServer and using jumpstart profile using a sysidcfg and flash_prof
3. The first installation is successful and system picks up configuration information from sysidcfg file on the install server.
4. Now we use lucreate to create another BE (Boot Environment) BE_2.
5. BE_2 is upgraded with luupgrade using the same flar as used in step 2.
6. Issuing command:
luactivate -s BE_2
7. After a init 6, system tries to boot from BE_2. This time instead of copying system files from BE_1 due to -s options specified, it instead runs the sysconfig command that asks for all the configuration options again.
8. When we were using these steps in Solaris 10 update 3 on Sun Fire v240, everything was working fine. The system config was available in BE_2 without any issue.
***************************************************************************************************************************************************

iMovie10 only works in and exports 16:9 aspect ratio.
The resolution is set by that of the first video clip put in a project timeline. To change your project to 1080p do the following:
Create a new project
Put any known 1080p video clip in the project (it can be removed later)
Select the old project and then Edit - Select All then Edit - Copy
Select the new project and then Edit - Copy
The new project should now be 1080p. You can remove the first clip if you want.
Geoff.

Solaris 10 update 6 keeps generating core file (/core)

I wonder if somebody has encountered the following issue.
I did a fresh install of Solaris 10 update 6 on two servers (T5140 and T524) from DVD.
I noticed that a core file was in the root filesystem (/core).
So, I deleted it.
As soon as I delete the core file, another one is generated.
This is happening on both servers where I installed Solaris 10 update 6 from the DVD.
This is not a live update install. Solaris was installed from scratch. When prompted to preserve previous data, I replied with 'do not preserve data'
Does anybody know where the core file is coming from and how to stop it being generated?
Found out that is coming from vold
SunOS b1osdtsun02 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5240
# more /etc/release
                      Solaris 10 10/08 s10s_u6wos_07b SPARC
           Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
                        Use is subject to license terms.
                            Assembled 27 October 2008
# mdb /core
Loading modules: [ libsysevent.so.1 libnvpair.so.1 libc.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
::statusdebugging core file of vold (32-bit) from b1osdtsun02
file: /usr/sbin/vold
initial argv: /usr/sbin/vold -f /etc/vold.conf
threading model: multi-threaded
status: process terminated by SIGSEGV (Segmentation Fault)
::stacklibc.so.1`strlen+0x18(408450a5, 0, 0, 88b70, 600, 180)
read_slices+0x114(874a0, b, 889a0, feeafd34, 1, 5)
read_hsfs_partition+0x88(b, 46c00, 6d0000, 2c, 34400, 1010101)
read_partition+0x30(874a0, 341a4, 3, 34000, 34400, 9)
create_top_partition+0x140(7cbe0, 7cc24, 7cbe0, 874a0, ffffffff, b)
0x265e0(800012, feeaff9c, c, 598e0, 7cbe0, ffffffff)
create_medium+0x74(800012, feeaff9c, 20, 12, 47800, c)
0x2232c(5d278, 0, 0, 800012, 20, 33000)
libc.so.1`_lwp_start(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>
#It seems that vold is failing to mount the DVD on both servers after Solaris was installed.
Is this a Solaris 10 update 6 bug?
Edited by: shen on Jan 29, 2009 8:45 PM

Never mind.
It is a known bug documented on manual " [Solaris 10 10/08 Release Notes, Chapter 2 Solaris Runtime Issues|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-5245/chapter2-1000?a=view] " as shown below.
The solution is to apply vold patch [138130-01|http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-138130-01-1].
Solaris 10 10/08 DVD Media Might Not be Automatically Mounted by vold (6712352)
The Solaris 10 10/08 DVD does not mount by default during runtime. No error message is displayed.
Workaround: Perform the following steps:
   1. Become superuser.
   2. Disable vold:
      * On Solaris 10 Systems:
            # svcadm disable -t volfs
      * On Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 systems:
            /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
   3. Mount the media manually by using the # mount -F hsfs path to block device path to mount point command. For example:
      # mount -F hsfs /dev/rdsk/c0t2d0s2 /mnt

Help only displays the frame in Solaris 10, update 6

I have a help application that has been running fine since Solaris 8. It works in Solaris 10, update 1, but not in update 6. Only an empty help frame is displayed. My JRE is 1.6.0_05-b13, and I am using help 1.1.13. I suspect that replacing the default HelpUI with my own subclass has stopped working. My application has this line of code which is used to replace the default HelpUI:
UIManager.getDefaults().put("HelpUI", "HelpUIWithClose");
The users wanted a close button, so HelpUIWithClose is subclassed from BasicHelpUI, and a big close button is added on the toolbar. This has been working for years. Before and after this line of code are two print statements that get the toString value of the UIDefaults HelpUI object. The results are:
(before)
javax.help.plaf.basic.BasicHelpUI
(after)
HelpUIWithClose
I am only guessing at the problem because of all of the "Unknown Source" values in the trace below. If I comment out the UIManager line above that replaces HelpUI with HelpUIWithClose, the help functions normally, but of course it is missing the close button added by HelpUIWithClose.
An alternate question might be how to add a close button to the toolbar of help?
I get a very long trace when this fails. I will post it at the end of this email. Any ideas on what is wrong?
Thanks,
Herb Miller
UIDefaults.getUI() failed: no ComponentUI class for: javax.help.JHelp[,0,0,0x0,invalid,alignmentX=0.0,alignmentY=0.0,border=,flags=0,maximumSize=,minimumSize=,preferredSize=]
java.lang.Error
at javax.swing.UIDefaults.getUIError(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.MultiUIDefaults.getUIError(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.UIDefaults.getUI(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.UIManager.getUI(Unknown Source)
at javax.help.JHelp.updateUI(JHelp.java:299)
at javax.help.JHelp.<init>(JHelp.java:121)
at javax.help.WindowPresentation.createJHelp(WindowPresentation.java:843)
at javax.help.WindowPresentation.createHelpWindow(WindowPresentation.java:879)
at javax.help.WindowPresentation.setDisplayed(WindowPresentation.java:346)
at javax.help.DefaultHelpBroker.setDisplayed(DefaultHelpBroker.java:178)
at javax.help.CSH.displayHelp(CSH.java:749)
at javax.help.CSH.access$200(CSH.java:80)
at javax.help.CSH$DisplayHelpFromSource.actionPerformed(CSH.java:1668)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.doClick(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicMenuItemUI.doClick(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicMenuItemUI$Handler.mouseReleased(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)

Never mind.
It is a known bug documented on manual " [Solaris 10 10/08 Release Notes, Chapter 2 Solaris Runtime Issues|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-5245/chapter2-1000?a=view] " as shown below.
The solution is to apply vold patch [138130-01|http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-138130-01-1].
Solaris 10 10/08 DVD Media Might Not be Automatically Mounted by vold (6712352)
The Solaris 10 10/08 DVD does not mount by default during runtime. No error message is displayed.
Workaround: Perform the following steps:
   1. Become superuser.
   2. Disable vold:
      * On Solaris 10 Systems:
            # svcadm disable -t volfs
      * On Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 systems:
            /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
   3. Mount the media manually by using the # mount -F hsfs path to block device path to mount point command. For example:
      # mount -F hsfs /dev/rdsk/c0t2d0s2 /mnt

So, noone at all is running SJS Web Server on Solaris 10 Update 6??

Trying to get some feedback on running SJS Web Server under Solaris 10 Update 6.
problems?
"Boy, That was a Mistake"
"Works Great"
"No Problems"
What?? Anything at all...
Thanks

Never mind.
It is a known bug documented on manual " [Solaris 10 10/08 Release Notes, Chapter 2 Solaris Runtime Issues|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-5245/chapter2-1000?a=view] " as shown below.
The solution is to apply vold patch [138130-01|http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-138130-01-1].
Solaris 10 10/08 DVD Media Might Not be Automatically Mounted by vold (6712352)
The Solaris 10 10/08 DVD does not mount by default during runtime. No error message is displayed.
Workaround: Perform the following steps:
   1. Become superuser.
   2. Disable vold:
      * On Solaris 10 Systems:
            # svcadm disable -t volfs
      * On Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 systems:
            /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
   3. Mount the media manually by using the # mount -F hsfs path to block device path to mount point command. For example:
      # mount -F hsfs /dev/rdsk/c0t2d0s2 /mnt

Solaris 100 update manager

After initial installation of solaris 10 and updated system via update manager. I encountered a video card problema nd had to re-install solaris 10, now I am getting an error when I attempt to update solaris 10 update manager
Error: Patch metadata errors were deleted. Obselesce processing failure. Could not find obselescing update for 127717-01.
Where have I gone wrong.
Any assistance will be appreciated.

I re-installad solaris 10 and during the update I ommitted SMC updates. However, I noticed unique problem after re-installation. I tried to download anotther tool from sun site. It failed due to lack of disk space. I preallocated 32GB drive-space during installation, I later observed that I only had 1.4GIG of disk space remaining. It seems like I should not have preallocated the entire 32gig to solaris 10 during installation, or should I have taken a different approach. A little puzzled right now.
Thanks a bunch!!

Postgresql service 8.2 on Solaris 10 Update 4

Hi
I have solaris 10 update 4 installed. PostgreSQL with SMF is shipped with Solaris 10 update 4.
I could see two services installed on the OS.
svcs postgresql
disabled 14:58:36 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_81
maintenance 15:40:42 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
I followed the steps to start postgres service given on Sun website...
PostgreSQL 8.2:
1. As root, su to postgres:
# su - postgres
2. Create PostgreSQL DB cluster:
$ /usr/postgres/8.2/bin/initdb -D /var/postgres/8.2/data
3. As root, use the SMF's svcadm command to start PostgreSQL:
# /usr/sbin/svcadm enable postgresql:version_82
now I could see one serive enabled.
svcs postgresql
disabled 14:58:36 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_81
online 15:40:42 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
But, when I disabled the service & restarted it using...
svcadm disable svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
svcadm enable svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
I see the serivce in the maintenance mode.
disabled 14:58:36 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_81
maintenance 15:40:42 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
Server.log shows following error:-
FATAL: syntax error in file "/var/postgres/8.2/data/postgresql.conf" line 104, near token "MB"
Can anyone help me know the reason?
Thanx in advance
Niraj

Hi
I have solaris 10 update 4 installed. PostgreSQL with SMF is shipped with Solaris 10 update 4.
I could see two services installed on the OS.
svcs postgresql
disabled 14:58:36 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_81
maintenance 15:40:42 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
I followed the steps to start postgres service given on Sun website...
PostgreSQL 8.2:
1. As root, su to postgres:
# su - postgres
2. Create PostgreSQL DB cluster:
$ /usr/postgres/8.2/bin/initdb -D /var/postgres/8.2/data
3. As root, use the SMF's svcadm command to start PostgreSQL:
# /usr/sbin/svcadm enable postgresql:version_82
now I could see one serive enabled.
svcs postgresql
disabled 14:58:36 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_81
online 15:40:42 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
But, when I disabled the service & restarted it using...
svcadm disable svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
svcadm enable svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
I see the serivce in the maintenance mode.
disabled 14:58:36 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_81
maintenance 15:40:42 svc:/application/database/postgresql:version_82
Server.log shows following error:-
FATAL: syntax error in file "/var/postgres/8.2/data/postgresql.conf" line 104, near token "MB"
Can anyone help me know the reason?
Thanx in advance
Niraj

Virtual MAC-Address on Solaris 10 update 9

Hi,
i'm installing Solaris 10 update 9 on UCS B-Series (B230 M2 or B440 M2) with M72KR-Q Adapter. We create the Service Profile with vNIC associated to vNIC Template. The vNIC Template use the MAC Pool Address configurated.
When we run ifconfig -a on Solaris we can view only the original MAC-Address instead of Virtual MAC-Addres. Is this correct?
Thanks in advance

When you say the "original" MAC are you referring to the Hardware Default?
Ensure your MAC pool has available addresses also. You can also test unbinding the vNIC template from the Solaris service profile, and manually assigning a MAC address (watch for overlap) to the vNIC and see if that pushes to the solaris host.
If that works, then you have a pool/template issue. If not, we'll need to investigate further.
Regards,
Robert

When SUN issues solaris 10 update 4?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for