When will flash builder support export to Windows Mobile OS?

I think maybe VB was confused by you calling it "Windows Mobile," as Windows Mobile is MS's obsolete, abandoned Mobile OS for pre-iPhone era with a stylus and all that, I am assuming you probably meant "Windows Phone" / Windows 8 Metro UI / Windows RT, the new iPhone-like MS Mobile OS.
See this thread: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4526684#4526684

Similar Messages

When will Flash Builder 5 be released?

When will Flash Builder 5 be released?

Good idea, i want work on Flash Builder 5
PS: Suggestion for mossed components since 2004 by Macromedia Inc.
Very old components from Flash MX 2004 / Flash 8 we missed there.
Flex SDK sees **** because xml-list for menu and it sometimes get error like menu doesn't load xml.
I knew about good functions by menu components from MX 2004 / 8 like thios
<instance> is menu component:
package
// Convert from old component by Macromedia into AS3
import components.Menu;
import components.MenuItem; // Idea by SourceSkyBoxer
import flash.Display.Sprite;
import flash.events.MouseEvent;
public class MainApp extends Sprite
private var menu:Menu;
private var fileItem:MenuItem;
private var closeItem:MenuItem;
public function MainApp()
menu = new Menu();
menu.addItem(fileItem);
menu.x = menu.y = 10;
this.addChild(menu);
fileItem = new MenuItem();
fileItem.label = "File";
newItem.addItem(closeItem)
closeItem = new MenuItem();
closeItem.label = "Close an application!";
closeItem.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onClickCLose);
private function onClickCLose(mev:MouseEvent):void
// Something function for handler
PS: I really missed Menu Component because MouseEvent.RightCLick / MouseEvent.CONTEXT_MENU are available since Flash Player 9. I am getting crazy because Menu Component from Flash Pro 9, 10, 11 and 12 haven't yet. Now Flex SDK has MouseEvent.CONTEXT_MENU here and i have tested Menu from Flex Component ( Flex SDK 3.6.0a ) = It works fine like i have created example desktop into Flash Player 11
Build by Flex SDK 4.9.11 with MX Version.
But i want go back Flash Pro CS5.5 / Flash Pro CS6. - Did you develop any minimal components for Pure AS3?
And i have tested with Aspiere Component uiMenu and it works fine, too with Away 3D under Flash Builder 4.5
PS: Aspire Components has faked skins like Windows 2k, XP and Vista Skins
There images are Flash Player 12, Aspire Component UI by Ghostwire with Away3D 4.1.6
But Aspire Component sees like Flex Components But they won't work with Away 3D - View3D inside uiWindow was hidden.
For future with Flash Player 13/14 looks like accessed hidden contextmenu like Qooxdoo Frameworks. I want to hide with Flash Player's Contextmenu.
Application's Container should to set to false without contextmenu. = No contextmenu? If they like this.... Thanks for support

When will Flash Player support my 64-bit browser?

I have had my new Windows 7 PC for a couple of weeks now. When I first got it, I kept getting messages telling me I needed to install Adobe Flash Player in order to get the full experience of a website. So I installed the Flash Player. Subsequently at many websites I got a pesky message about the Flash Player. (I forget the precise content of the message, but I'm sure many people using 64-bit browsers are familiar with it.)
I went to Adobe's site and discovered that the Flash Player did not support 64-bit browsers. Adobe's recommended solution for this disturbing news was that I install and run a 32-bit version of Internet Explorer, and Adobe didn't exactly lead me by the hand in explaining how I should do that. I was told to go to Microsoft and get help there. Yeh, right! Suddenly I'm thinking about a couple of hours of hassle. Nevertheless I browsed over to Microsoft and clicked to a few pages. I did not find any easy-to-follow instructions on how to uninstall my 64-bit Internet Explorer 8 and install a 32-bit version.
Is Adobe advising me to take a step backward? Is, or is not, 64-bit browsing better than 32-bit browsing?
I did not, and have not, installed the 32-bit Internet Explorer. Instead I found help at Adobe for uninstalling the Flash Player. Those pesky messages are history.
I really have not noticed any difference in quality between my former 32-bit browsing and my present 64-bit browsing, with and without the Flash Player. My browsing experience has been good, and I think the Flash Player adds nothing significant. Surely it adds nothing critical. Windows Vista has come and gone without Adobe providing support for its 64-bit version. Maybe the same thing will happen for Windows 7. So be it. If a Flash Player comes out that supports 64 bits, then I will use it. If Flash Player never supports 64 bits, then I'll never again use Flash Player.
I saw another post here, a fairly recent one, where a replier said that about 70% of Internet browsers are still using Windows XP. (I guess more than 90% of those use 32-bit browsers.) Okay, I believe that, but what about the other 30%? If only a measly 5% of all Internet browsers use 64 bits, that's a hell-of-a-lot of people. Surely thousands, maybe millions. Are all these people to be fobbed off? Does Adobe really have something more important to work on?
Should Adobe be condemned for its lassitude regarding 64-bit support? I think so, but what about the horde of websites that features the Flash Player? Knowing well that there are thousands, or millions, of people using 64-bit browsers, should not those websites and their organizations also be condemned?

Frankly I think Adobe is treating its customers shabbilly in this regard. There is a much larger 64 bit windows installed base than 64 bit linux, yet adobe have released the 64 bit linux support first, and not even announced the 64 bit windows version in any way for over a year.
Come on Adobe, we understand you and Microsoft are competitors, but don't let your users get caught in the cross fire. There are now close to as many computers running 64 bit windows than there are running any version of linux, or any version of mac os, 32 bit included.
It has been over a year and a half since Adobe even updated its position on this issue on its web site. Search bing for 64 bit flash and you get 32 million hits. 64 bit windows is nearly 3 years old as a released product, and 4+ years in terms of dobe having access to it.
Adobe, surely at the very least, you owe it to your customers to tell them when you plan to address this.

When will Flash CC support vector output?

Using CS6 is awful on a retina monitor, and isn't a valid long-term solution.

Adobe need to address this issue. I used to rely heavily on ai export from Flash which worked fine in earlier versions. Now there seems to be no route to get vector stills from Flash. The SVG output in CC2014 although slow and clunky was OK - but doesn't now work - < I get a JS error..>. now that's left me with a huge problem... I pay good money for CC every month - and I'm a lifelong Adobe fan - but I think their product support (via CC app update) of late has become very shoddy - Adobe: these are professional products for which professional subscriptions are being paid.. you've taken years to build up your reputation - so please - SORT these issues!

When will the JRE support Intel 64EMT/Windows

I have an Intel dual pentium 4 processor that claims to support 64EMT. I was thinking about loading Windows 2003 Server 64 bit edition with JAVA to test our JAVA product we sell. I found out though that for Windows the current JRE only supports the AMD64 processor. Does anyone know when they will have a JRE that support the Intel 64EMT architecture on the Windows platform?
Thanks,
John

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/system-configurations.html says that Sun's JDK-1.5.0_02 (and later) supports Windows Server 2003 x64 Editions on both AMD64 and EMT64T in 64-bit mode, among other hardware and operating system platforms. There isn't a plug-in for the 64-bit browsers.

When will HTML5 be supported on all browsers without Flash

When will HTML5 be supported on all browsers without Flash. Flash is a support nightmare. No matter how much Adobe wants to rescue it, it's antiquated proprietary functionality that poses both security and support issues.

"When will HTML5 be supported on all browsers without Flash?"
This is a really weird question. Why ask it here?
For starters...HTML5 support on all browsers is not something Adobe is responsible for, so why ask that question on this forum? Instead, if you want anyone with a stake in the issue to answer it, ask the browser manufacturers (e.g. Microsoft, Google, Mozilla, Apple) when they will be supporting all features of HTML5. The ball's in their court right now.
Secondly, for e-learning developers HTML5 is currently a bigger support nightmare than Flash ever was. At least with Flash we had a runtime (Flash Player) that all major desktop browsers supported. You could create a course in Flash or Captivate, and as long as the end-user's browser had a current version of Flash Player, you could be reasonably certain it would run, and run smoothly. HTML5 output from most current generation authoring tools runs like a dog with three legs. And e-learning developers forced to build HTML5 or mobiles are encountering a minefield of wildly differing screen sizes and inconsistent implementations reminiscent of the worst years of the 90's "browser wars". HTML5 is no picnic. Give me Flash any day.
Thirdly, Adobe already knows they cannot "rescue" Flash. Why do you think they've already started rolling out HTML5-centric apps such as the Edge Toolset.
Fourthly, the rumours of the death of Flash have been wildly exaggerated. Flash is very much alive and well and happily living inside many of the games and apps that people are currently playing with on their mobile devices.

WHen will be Essbase 9.3 on WIndows 2003 not longer supported?

When will ask Essbase 9.3 on Windows 2003 Note longer supported?

I would say it's already the case ...
Based on the "Oracle Support Lifetime Policy" the Premier and Extended support for Essbase 9.3 are already over, so now it's in "Sustaining Support": it just means it's not going nowhere else (no patch, no updates, nothing). But it will stay in that status forever .... So as long as you have licenses for your system you can continue to run Essbase 9.3 on your Windows 2003 server.
Would probably be good to get in touch with your Oracle contact person to double check that.

When will WebGL be supported on iOS Mobile Safari?

In our enterpirse we have developed a WebGL application using Three.js framework. Now, our customer wants it to run on Apple iPad. The problem is that we have found out that WebGL is only supported on iOS by using iAd. So we are wondering when will WebGL be supported on iOS mobile Safari to decide what to do.
Thanks!

Dunno, it's a bit off topic, but there's no way that an emulated ARM build of flash would even run at all on iOS at the current point, let alone 7 years ago.
It's not that you can't build good flash, it's just that people don't. As you've said, you can use a dumbed down, non-extensible Adobe GUI to spit out javascript, and it'll tank just the same. Adobe Photoshop used to be the most blazingly fast application on the Mac. Adobe are a different story these days. Flash is a resource hog, whereas javascript is outright inefficient at moving graphics around, although it is improving substantially.
Flex, on the other hand, is open source.
Flash was actually created by Adobe. Adobe owned the vector graphics bezier patents, so Macromedia couldn't build a GUI editor for their Shockwave platform, which was sort of C++ territory, for making CD ROMS. Not used a lot because of the manual type of input required.
Macromedia bought flash as a cheapo animation program with some strange usability ideas (such as applying boolean intersects to overlapping objects without asking you), but combining this legally-released and patent-free GUI editor with shockwave export capabilities made shockwave accessible to non-technical users. Who would pile on loads of effects, run it natively as an app to test, and then deploy it in a web plugin which runs far less efficiently. That's not exactly Flash's fault, but the fact that they've just ported it wholesale a whole bunch of times without a proper human rewrite makes for evil performance, a problem you don't have with javascript. You don't have to get what Adobe want to give you as a binary, like it or lump it.
iOS ***** in many ways, the fact that you have to reverse engineer everything and crack if you want to get even the most basic level of customisability and extensibility that you would expect on any decent computer is genuinely frightening. That device could also be up to absolutely anything behind your back, and you'd be none the wiser staring at the GUI. Just trust apple. Or ask somebody who has been prodding around in there with a sharp screwdriver.
Neither Adobe nor Apple have an entirely ideal character for the relationship to have worked. Adobe own a shedload of patents when it comes to the maths behind image processing technology. Adobe Postscript is built into OSX, comes from NeXT. Mr Jobs lost his rag with Adobe when Adobe forced Apple programmers to work on the code related to PostScript in some sort of high security bunker, and wouldn't let them take away anything but binaries. This made the development work a massive hassle. The Apple programmers also suggested that a lot of the code was hidden out of shame rather than out of protectionism. Adobe's real strength is legalised monopolies on basic image processing technology, they've owned it since they turned over Paintbox's patents on alpha blending of pixels.
Been using Apple & Adobe products as my day to day workhorse stuff for over 20 years. Adobe used to be just as bad as the other software firms for generally mean behaviour, but they did write hand-optimised C++, and every year they'd raise the bar with features that you actually need. Each new version would save you weeks in a month.
Post-internet, whole different ballgame. Different setup, $bns at stake now. Land grab for the new ultra-consumerised computer technology. The good thing about consumers is that you can subject them to abuse, they get a yea or nay decision. Do you want what we're giving you?
These sorts of computer industry companies used to be toolmakers for the graphics industry.
Now they're supplying the communications technology for everything. Consumables plugged into every industry in the world. That sort of power is a corrupting influence.

Invalid Segment Alignment - Flash Builder 4.7 on Windows

I received the following message when I attempted to submit my app to apple:
Invalid Segment Alignment - This app does not have proper segment alignment and should be rebuilt with the latest version of Xcode. Please contact Developer Technical Support if you need further assistance.
While this issue is being discussed for Flash CC 2014 on Mac, I am producing the IPA via Flash Builder 4.7 on Windows, and then offloading that to a Mac to upload with Application Loader.
Is there a workaround for Flash Builder 4.7 on Windows? What about Flash Builder 4.7 on Mac? (theoretically I could temporarily transfer my creative cloud license over from one of the two machines that have it, and publish from Flash Builder there... but this is really rather annoying. Will do it if it's the only way though)

David, the other thread is quite long, but the bottom line is: you need to the use latest (15.0.302) AIR SDK Beta to build your IPA file, whether on Windows or Mac.
I'm not a Flash Builder user, but there's a documented process for overlaying the AIR SDK into Flash Builder - I believe this is still applicable.
Cheers,
-Jeff

When will Adobe Reader support interactive PDF elements on iOS?

When will Adobe Reader support interactive PDF elements on iOS? I don't want to hear the line that Apple won't allow Flash. Adobe needs to get a workaround PRONTO! We need detection of simple buttons and support for Mp4 and f4v - as exported inline by inDesign when creating PDFs.

Pat Willener, Thank you for your message. I have done what you suggest. I could have sworn I started this topic in the general Adobe Reader discussion. So I have also placed a copy back where I thought I first had it so it can be found by other Windows users who, like me, are creating PDF files because they are meant to comply with an international cross-platform standard and not simply be the domain of one platform over the other.
*******Enhancement / FMR*********
Brief title for your desired feature: Support for interactive PDFs
How would you like the feature to work? When I add a transparent frame containing a basic Adobe Media encoded mp4 or f4v video, export to interactive PDF from Adobe InDesign, I want the PDF and its interactive videos to work on iPads. See an example file here: ***EXAMPLE PROVIDED*** Click the lefthand top and bottom corners to bring up interactive video elements which should open in floating window, maximized, then have an exit button to close and continue reading the PDF. Of course, this does not function under Adobe Reader for iOS. You also need to attend to audio files embedded in the same way and allow an exit button to close the audio window so the reader can continue reading the PDF on Windows.
Why is this feature important to you? I create eReaders for schools across the whole country and they are taking up iPads at an unprecedented rate. If Adobe do not produce a solution for interactive PDFs on iOS then I will no longer use InDesign, Acrobat, Adobe Media Encoder or Photoshop to create works in the future. You're looking at a massive education market that will leave Adobe behind if this is not acted upon very very soon. For some publishers it's already too late and they have moved to app based creation tools.

When Will flash be available on the iPad ?

When Will flash be available on iPad ? A lot of sites are not working?

itim101 wrote:
Adobe is working on a Flash to HTML5 converter that will convert your Flash applets to HTML5, you can check it out here -http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/wallaby/
Incorrect, Wallaby does not convert Flash applets to html5.
What Wallaby does is allow you to use ONE tool in flash, the timeline, which is used to draw and animate. Nothing else flash does can be exported using wallaby, only timeline animations.
Basically what wallaby does is allows you to make an html5 equivilent of an animated .gif
ZERO code used in flash is exported, meaning zero interactivity can be exported.
Not only does wallaby only export timeline animation in animated gif format for use in html5, but it cant even export filters, like glows, drop shadows etc.
Wallaby simply takes advantage of a new animation element just released on the web called <canvas> it uses canvas to show your animation, exactly like a gif. No interactivity, no code, nothing, simply a stationary animation.
What you do with that animation beyond wallaby is up to you, just like developers have been using animated gif advertisements, wallaby is ment to do the exact same thing, allow advertisers who have simple animation banner ads, publish them to html5 format for use on ios.
Yes that is right... no longer do you have the ability to block ads on ios like you can on all other systems, because your ads very soon will be in a format that you or your computer can not distinguish between actual needed content.
Again, wallaby simply makes html5 versions of animated gifs you build on the timeline, that is all it does, it makes animated gifs.

Where is the "done" button in Flash CS4 when using Flash Builder 4's new flash component or container?

The documentation for Flash Builder 4 beta says that after opening flash from flash builder, I should click a "done" button in flash and flash should close and what I created in flash should be included as a component or container in Flash Builder. Using the Flash Builder 4 beta on Windows, when I click on the "create in flash" button on the properties panel for either the new flash component or container, Flash CS4 opens, I create something in Flash and no "done" button is present. Nor is anything present in the menus resembling a "done" option. Where is it?

Hi Jeffrey:
Still no done button. Now under commands in Flash I can convert symbols to flex components and containers and these show up in the Flash library.
Thanks:
Jim
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:58:10 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Where is the "done" button in Flash CS4 when using Flash Builder 4's new flash component or container?
Hi,
You may need to install FlexComponentKit.mxp to your Flash CS4 beforehand.
Jeffrey
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:04:36 -0600
From: mailto:[email protected]
To: mailto:[email protected]
Subject: Flex Where is the "done" button in Flash CS4 when using Flash Builder 4's new flash component or container?
I apparently didn't get one. I've looked under various workspace configurations. Another thing that seems odd is that when Flash opens I get the opening panel that allows me to select the type of file and version of AS I want to use. I select new file with AS3. Any ideas on why the "done" button wouldn't be present and if the opening panel is what I should expect on opening Flash after clicking the "create in Flash" button?
>
>

HT202157 When will Apple TV support Amazon Prime Instant Video?

When will Apple TV support Amazon prime instant video?

Most of the YouTube video subtitles are inserted by flash. Unfortunately, ios OS products don't support flash. If you do want to play them with subtitle, maybe you can use a video converter to help you convert YouTube videos to Apple TV. The only thing you should make sure before the conversion is that the videos that you download is bearing the subtitle, then the converted files would have the substitles as well. Hope that would help.

NAC and OSX 10.7 Lion - when will the agent support it?

OSX 10.7 aka Lion was release on July 21st. Cisco NAC Agent does not support it. When will it be supported and under what version?

We are using 4.8.0 CAM/CAS and these versions
Current Windows NAC Agent Version:
4.8.2.1
Current Macintosh Clean Access Agent:
4.8.2.590
Current Cisco NAC Web Agent Version:
4.8.1.4
Current Windows Compliance Module Version:
3.4.21.1
I want to believe you about 4.8.2 supportin OSX Lion but I can't find any documentation on Cisco's site stating that. The compatibility matrix only goes upto Snow Leopard 10.6
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/support_guide/agntsprt.html#wp68131 - can you show me where that is documented?

When will Lightroom be supporting UHD/4K Displays (Win.)

Simple question (Windows!)
- When will Lightroom be supporting UHD/4K Displays and support HighDPI modes?
- its a Nightmare to use it on a Dell UP2414Q without Font adjustment
- I only use Lightroom but its seems this problem exists on any Adobe App. (Photoshop .... etc..)
Thanks

Yes I have tested that the different font sizes do actually work. Who told you that they don't?
This is my normal display on a 1920x1200 monitor:
And this is the same display using the 150% font setting:

When will flash builder support export to Windows Mobile OS?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for