When will wccp be vrf aware on 6500

wccp is vrf aware for many plataforms, when will wccp vrf aware on 6500 plataform? Someone knows the roadmap for this feature?

Zach Seils wrote:VRF-aware WCCP will not be supported on the 6500 platform until the next-generation Supervisor (SUP-2T).
Hi Zach, is this a limitation of the Sup 720 (as in, the hardware can't support it), or will a future IOS release be able to support VRF aware WCCP on the Sup 720?

Similar Messages

Is wccp v2 VRF aware?

Is there a version of IOS code available that has VRF support for WCCP.
Thanks

Eddie,
yes, it is on our todo list.
I would suggest you to contact you sales team to inform them you need this feature.
They have the power to make things move faster sometimes :-)
Gilles.

VRF Aware WCCP !!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!

I am looking for a forcast of when WCCP will have VRF support. Head-End scalability is pretty tough to achieve with out it. ywa I can stack WAE's ( up to 32) in a WCCP service group but if the Edge WAE's are in A VRF, it breaks.
Any Ideas?

The VRF awareness for 12.4(T) is still probably 8-12 months out. VRF aware WCCP features are definitely in the pipeline, but nothing has been publically published on availability timelines.
It's now publically available on the forum... but , I've only found it on the 3750 and 3550 documentation.
at the 3750 you will need to place the redirect statement on each of the VLANs, ip wccp 61 redirect in
Kindly find here GRE Tunnel with VRF Configuration Example:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk428/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801e1294.shtml
I have gotten as far as the WAE registering the router:
"WCCP configuration for TCP Promiscuous service 61 and 62 succeeded.
WCCP configuration for TCP Promiscuous succeeded.Please remember to
configure WCCP service 61 and 62 on the corresponding router."
wae01#sh wccp router
Router Information for Service: TCP Promiscuous 61
Routers Configured and Seeing this Wide Area Engine(1)
Router Id Sent To Recv ID
0.0.0.0 209.1.1.1 0000022F
The router registers the WAE as a WCCP client:
router04#
"*Feb 4 18:56:09.892: %WCCP-5-SERVICEFOUND: Service 61 acquired on WCCP
client 209.1.1.2"
"*Feb 4 18:56:09.892: %WCCP-5-SERVICEFOUND: Service 62 acquired on WCCP
client 209.1.1.2"
The router however cannot figure out what its ID is and does not see
itself as a WCCP group router.
router04#sh ip wccp
Global WCCP information:
Router information:
Router Identifier: -not yet determined-
Protocol Version: 2.0
Service Identifier: 61
Number of Service Group Clients: 1
Number of Service Group Routers: 0
Total Packets s/w Redirected: 0
Process: 0
Fast: 0
CEF: 0
Redirect access-list: ACCELERATED-TRAFFIC
Total Packets Denied Redirect: 0
Total Packets Unassigned: 25957
Group access-list: -none-
Total Messages Denied to Group: 0
Total Authentication failures: 0
Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0
This is a short summary of important commands for working with VRF's.
View the VRF instances and the associated interfaces.
ml-mr-c6-gs#show ip vrf
Name Default RD Interfaces
blurvrf 100:2 Vlan215
Vlan326
tgvrf 100:1 Vlan132
Vlan325
TenGigabitEthernet1/1
ml-mr-c6-gs#
Show the routing table for a specific VRF.
ml-mr-c6-gs#show ip route vrf tgvrf
Routing Table: tgvrf
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external,
---More--
Gateway of last resort is 128.117.243.57 to network 0.0.0.0
O E2 192.52.106.0/24 [110/1] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
O E2 192.168.150.0/24 [110/160] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
172.17.0.0/29 is subnetted, 3 subnets
O E2 172.17.1.16 [110/0] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
O E2 172.17.1.8 [110/1] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
O E2 172.17.1.0 [110/1] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
--More--
Debugging should otherwise be similar to a regular switch or router.
Final Teragrid VRF Design and Diagrams
http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/nets/devices/routers/cisco/vrf/final.shtml
Teragrid Testbed Design
http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/nets/devices/routers/cisco/vrf/testbed.shtml
Cisco 4500 Series Switch Cisco IOS s/w config guide 12.1(20)EW
Configuring VRF-Lite
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.1/20ew/configuration/guide/vrf.html
sachin garg

VRF-Aware WCCP

I want to put one Cache-Engine at PE router to provide caching services for different VPNs.
Customer will have Separate VPN to access Internet, Cache-engine is put at common VRF & accesible from Customer sites in different VPNs
Can't find any related document, & don't have Lab to test. Anyone experience this, please confirm for me.
Thanks a lot
Long

The VRF awareness for 12.4(T) is still probably 8-12 months out. VRF aware WCCP features are definitely in the pipeline, but nothing has been publically published on availability timelines.
It's now publically available on the forum... but , I've only found it on the 3750 and 3550 documentation.
at the 3750 you will need to place the redirect statement on each of the VLANs, ip wccp 61 redirect in
Kindly find here GRE Tunnel with VRF Configuration Example:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk428/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801e1294.shtml
I have gotten as far as the WAE registering the router:
"WCCP configuration for TCP Promiscuous service 61 and 62 succeeded.
WCCP configuration for TCP Promiscuous succeeded.Please remember to
configure WCCP service 61 and 62 on the corresponding router."
wae01#sh wccp router
Router Information for Service: TCP Promiscuous 61
Routers Configured and Seeing this Wide Area Engine(1)
Router Id Sent To Recv ID
0.0.0.0 209.1.1.1 0000022F
The router registers the WAE as a WCCP client:
router04#
"*Feb 4 18:56:09.892: %WCCP-5-SERVICEFOUND: Service 61 acquired on WCCP
client 209.1.1.2"
"*Feb 4 18:56:09.892: %WCCP-5-SERVICEFOUND: Service 62 acquired on WCCP
client 209.1.1.2"
The router however cannot figure out what its ID is and does not see
itself as a WCCP group router.
router04#sh ip wccp
Global WCCP information:
Router information:
Router Identifier: -not yet determined-
Protocol Version: 2.0
Service Identifier: 61
Number of Service Group Clients: 1
Number of Service Group Routers: 0
Total Packets s/w Redirected: 0
Process: 0
Fast: 0
CEF: 0
Redirect access-list: ACCELERATED-TRAFFIC
Total Packets Denied Redirect: 0
Total Packets Unassigned: 25957
Group access-list: -none-
Total Messages Denied to Group: 0
Total Authentication failures: 0
Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0
This is a short summary of important commands for working with VRF's.
View the VRF instances and the associated interfaces.
ml-mr-c6-gs#show ip vrf
Name Default RD Interfaces
blurvrf 100:2 Vlan215
Vlan326
tgvrf 100:1 Vlan132
Vlan325
TenGigabitEthernet1/1
ml-mr-c6-gs#
Show the routing table for a specific VRF.
ml-mr-c6-gs#show ip route vrf tgvrf
Routing Table: tgvrf
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external,
---More--
Gateway of last resort is 128.117.243.57 to network 0.0.0.0
O E2 192.52.106.0/24 [110/1] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
O E2 192.168.150.0/24 [110/160] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
172.17.0.0/29 is subnetted, 3 subnets
O E2 172.17.1.16 [110/0] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
O E2 172.17.1.8 [110/1] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
O E2 172.17.1.0 [110/1] via 128.117.243.57, 1d19h, Vlan325
--More--
Debugging should otherwise be similar to a regular switch or router.
Final Teragrid VRF Design and Diagrams
http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/nets/devices/routers/cisco/vrf/final.shtml
Teragrid Testbed Design
http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/nets/devices/routers/cisco/vrf/testbed.shtml
Cisco 4500 Series Switch Cisco IOS s/w config guide 12.1(20)EW
Configuring VRF-Lite
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.1/20ew/configuration/guide/vrf.html
sachin garg

6500 VRF aware NAT

Hi
In an Enterprise Network we are using CAT6500 SUP720/MSFC3B with VRF Lite.
According to the Software Advisor VRF aware NAT is not supported on the 6k. But I think with the MPLS image it should be supported.
My question: Is it supported and if yes whats the recommended image if i just want to have vrf-lite with vrf aware NAT - no MPLS
cheers
patrick

IF you have a FWSM then you should be good to go for the VRF-Aware NAT. I am not aware of NAT being performed natively on the SUP.
HTH-Cheers,
Swaroop

Extending VRF-lite to 6500??

Hello,
I have a simple scenario, where there is a 6500 connected to a router (ISP end), which we have planned to implement vrf-lite on.... there are basically 2 VLANs on the LAN, one production and one guest... we need to isolate the routing table instances between the production and guest.. we have planned to configure trunk between the 6500 and PE router at the ISP end. 6500 acts as a CE here.
Now, I want to extend the VRF information from the PE to the 6500 CE, since the layer 3 VLANs terminate on the 6500. i will define the same VRF information on the 6500 and isolate VRF routing tables for the guest/production vlan on the LAN also.. I know we will require to configure VRF, RD, BGP etc on the PE router and do a "ip vrf forwarding" on the subinterface of the router. What is the configuration required on the 6500 to extend the VRF-lite information to the end vlans ????? does anyone have any sample configs or links to which i can refer ?
Raj

Well,
first a sample config (not from a 6500, but you should be able to get the idea):
ip vrf Cust1
rd 65000:1
ip vrf Cust2
rd 65000:2
interface FastEthernet0/0.100
encapsulation dot1Q 100
ip vrf forwarding Cust1
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
interface FastEthernet0/0.200
encapsulation dot1Q 200
ip vrf forwarding Cust1
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.252
interface FastEthernet0/0.300
encapsulation dot1Q 300
ip vrf forwarding Cust2
ip address 10.20.1.1 255.255.255.252
interface FastEthernet0/0.333
encapsulation dot1Q 333
ip vrf forwarding Cust2
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
!On a 6500 you could also have:
interface vlan 400
ip vrf forwarding Cust2
ip address 10.1.123.1 255.255.255.252
router rip
address-family ipv4 vrf Cust1
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
no auto-summary
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf Cust2
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
no auto-summary
exit-address-family
The separation in the control plane (routing etc.) is achieved through the normal VRF configuration. Overlapping IPs and such are supported by having separate IP routing tables per VRF and VRF aware routing protocols like RIP, OSPF, etc.
In the data plane traffic is sorted by layer2 encapsulation. In the example above, the dot1Q VLAN tag will deliver the same functionality as the MPLS VPN labels. If f.e. an IP packet with destination 10.1.1.1 arrives, the VLAN tag 100 or 333 will allow the VRF-lite CE to determine, whether it belongs to Cust1 or Cust2. The same differentation will take place for traffic from the CE to the PE. So the PE config is practically the same, BUT in addition MP-BGP and route-targets and MPLS towards the core is used.
So no MPLS is needed on the VRF-lite CE router, no labels will be used, hence VRF-lite.
The PE will not be the PHP LSR in the MPLS sense, because it is the LAST router in the MPLS network.
Instead of the FastEthernet also VLAN interfaces can be used. The number of interfaces per VRF or the number of VRFs are limited by memory.
Hope this helps! Please use the rating system.
Regards, Martin

VRF aware syslog

Hello ,
Im trying to configure syslog on a CPE which has VRF_A configured on it. Our requirement is to have this CPE send syslogs to two servers , one in customers own network which is part of global routing table and second is providers syslog server which is part of VRF_A.
As per my knowledhe I cannot specify any source interface for syslog through vrf and the source IP is picked up automatically by IOS from the interface which is part of the VRF. However when I have multiple interfacec in the same VRF which IP is picked up by IOS ?
Is there any way to acheive this ? Im attaching a diagram depicting the scenario .
I have put in below config on the device.
logging source-interface Loopback100
logging 3.3.3.3
logging host 69.26.45.139 vrf A
logging 2.2.2.2

Saurabh,
the box will pick up the best interface according to the 'sh ip ro vrf A' output and send the syslogs off this interface. We currently hasve these two DDTS'es to address that:
CSCsu22476 Bug Details
Set source interface for VRF-aware syslog messages
Symptom:
customer can not set the source interface for VRF-Aware Syslog messages.
Conditions:
Normal config mode.
Workaround:
Feature is not implemented.
and
CSCtn11379
Allow vrf syslogging from a specific source interface on routers
Symptom: VRF syslogging doesn't allow specifying the source interface. Conditions: VRF syslogging must be enabled. Syslogging to global routing table allows specification of the source interface.Workaround: None.
check them out on CCO for the list of fixed versions, should be working in 15th somewhere.
HTH,
Ivan.

When will the maps bug in IOS6 be fixed?

When will the maps bug in IOS6 be fixed?

richard0801 wrote:
Thats not where they are thats where Apple think they are, try coming out of Victoria walking straight across the road and you are in ????? god knows where on apple but its not where you acually are, I have tried it and its total crap. By the way there are 2 Hammersmith underground stations. Your map just shows 1 pin
You explicity claimed that "all 400 stations are missing" in Apple Maps. I only needed to locate one to prove you wrong. Instead, I proved you doubly wrong. I didn't realize I needed to prove you triply-wrong. Oh well...
Naming subway stops is not Apple's responsibility and obviously not London's strenths. The pin shows the general location of "hammersmith".
Okay I am in Holloway road, where is the nearest station to me?, if I don't know the name I cant find the station. I know there are 6 but Apple does not show any of them
When I enter "holloway road london", I get a bunch of pins and the first one that automatically gets selected is the subway station. Since that is one of "any of them", you have been proved wrong 4 times over.
Etre have you ever been out and used walking maps? I think you need specsavers
Do you actually own an iPhone? Are you aware it has GPS? Have you really ever actually tried it? Because when I manually nagivate to one end of Holloway road and search for "underground", I get this:
Strangely, if I go to the other end of the street and do the same thing, I get an entirely different station:
I wonder what would happen if I did a similar search for "underground" while zoomed in on the "hammersmith" pin?
Well what do you know? But how would I ever get there? Hmmm, you mentioned "walking maps". Maybe I should try walking directions from "hammersmith" to one of the underground stations.
By my count, I have proved your anti-Apple Maps misinformation to be wrong 6 times over. Wanna try for a lucky seven?

Firefox mac osx version does not support mac-Lion os full screen window mode. When will you bring this?

In macbook pro with lion os apple gives a full-screen-mode icon in the top right corner of the window, which will be used to open that view in different window. But firefox does not support this. Even chrome supports it.
When will you bring this feature to firefox?. Currently I am in firefox 8.0.1

No answers, but Mozilla is aware of the new release of Lion, and hopefully are working on solving some of the known issues. There are some rather formal technical discussions and reports, as mentioned in this contributors thread: [/forums/contributors/707160]

RADIUS config for VRF-aware VPDN multihop tunnel

Hi,
Can't find the LNS config directives those will lead to get complete(!) vpdn profile from radius.
The configuration is:
LAC-LNS/PE-LNS/CE
LNS/PE - provider edge lns that we want to configure using radius profile for vrf-aware multihop vpdn so that incoming tunnel is switched out to LNS/CE in one of the vrfs configured on LNS/PE.
The "vpdn tunnel authorization " command lets me get the profile for ingress session coming from LAC, but in order to switch the tunnel further to LNS/CE i have to config vpdn-group on LNS/PE. Is it possible to make a RADIUS profile that LNS/PE will use for both ingress and egress tunnels?

Hello Alex,
I would like to point you to this forun into another section. There is currently a "Ask The Expert" about MPLS VPNs at http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dda563c
Maybe it will be more suitable to address your questions there.
Hope this Helps!
Regards, Martin

My ipad revel app does not load after latest upgrade. When will this be fixed? Do we get a credit on our subscription?

My Ipad app doesn't start after the latest upgrade. When will this be fixed? Do I get a credit on my subcription?

Hi,
This is Ian from the revel team. We are working actively with Apple to fix this issue. We are definitely aware of it and trying to fix as soon as possible. I am so sorry for the inconvenience.
Best,
Ian

When will they update iMovie to allow it to upload videos longer than 15 minutes?

When will they update iMovie to allow video uploads longer than 15 minutes to youtube or is there a setting that can be changed that I am not aware of?

indeed, although you're entitled for uploads beyond 15min (as I do ), iM sets some unwanted benchmark. me no programmer, unfortunately diggin' thru various -plists of the app didn't show me any 'hidden flag' we can set to change that.
don't complain, make Apple directly an Enhancement request:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/imovie.html

What is up with the I pad pre loaded Calender? Am told it is faulty, which is why I can't see the month of March. When will this be sorted. It is a nuisance

What is up with the preloaded Calendar on my I pad? I can't see the month of March! Am told that there is a fault, but when will it be fixed?

I have to assume that Apple is aware of it and its working on it. Hopefully, it will be fixed in a new update. But nobody here knows when that will be.
A workaround is to remove any all day events from April 1st or change them to a few hours - but remove all day events.

VRF AWARE NAT

hi, i want to implement vrf aware nat and i want to create a single pool for all vrfs. when the traffic returns is there a way the ios identify which vrf the IP belongs to so i dont have to specify the pool for each vpn whit static routes? Thanks ahead- asanes

Hi,
As I understand you want to integrate NAT with MPLS based VPNs.
Follwing Cisco link should help:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t13/ftnatvpn.htm#wp1035671
Cheers,
Sultan.

2800s, AIM-VPN-SSL2, vrf aware IPSEC, high CPU low throughput

We have a couple of new 2821s deployed across a fibre link and they were originally running 12.4 (non T) versions using software encryption. We would get around 8Mb/s throughput. Upgrading to T to use the installed AIM cards we now see the AIM cards in use (show cry isakmp sa det shows then engine as aim vpn), but we still get the same throughput and high CPU. allowing CEF on the interface doubles throughput but with the same high CPU. The only process I can see going high is IP Input. Is this because of vrf aware ipsec - or any other suggestions?

Hi Nick,
I am having the same issue. We have a 2851 as a IPSEC VPN headend with an AIM VPN module but we are seeing high CPU usage(80%) with just 4-5mbps worth of traffic. I have an idea that I might have a NAT issue.
We are currently running, NAT, ZFW, and IPSEC site 2 site VPN on the router.
When I look at my ZONE firewall policy-map output it is showing all of my VPN traffic as process switched.
Inspect
Packet inspection statistics [process switch:fast switch]
tcp packets: [14809800:0]
udp packets: [145107:0]
icmp packets: [20937:12]
I have disabled the ZFW and still see high cpu although it is a little lower.
Packets are not fragmented, CEF and fast switching looks to be enabled. I am using a route-map for my nonats. That is the only thing I can think of now.
I have tried IOS 12.4(20)T3,4 and 12.4(15)T9. Same results.
Anyone have some ideas?

When will wccp be vrf aware on 6500

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for