When will you make adobe compatible with Dreamweaver

I'm a UI Designer. I know light html and CSS. I don't want to have to figure out all the latest browser compatibilities, and I want to be able to avoid learning javascript/jquery but be able have cool effects in my website or client websites like parallax scrolling, lightbox, etc.
If you went about this in an intelligent manner, you would make this compatible with Dreamweaver for designers to update, for UI/UX designers to use as high fidelity prototypes that can be handed off to developers later, and for designers to import into Dreamweaver to finesse styles and change elements. If this doesn't happen, I can easily see this becoming a dinosaur like Web Objects Fusion and clients will be left with obsolete products.
PLEASE make this a useful product that plays well with Dreamweaver!

You have it backwards. Google (and other 3rd-party vendors) must make their products compatible with the browser.
'''Some Background Information''' 
Included with every Firefox extension is a file named install.rdf. In that file is a parameter "em:maxVersion" which indicates the maximum Firefox version with which the extension '''has been tested and approved by the developer''' (Google, in this case). Only the developer (Google) is responsible for changing that parameter. Firefox enforces that parameter.
That said. Google and all other developers know where to find the Firefox release schedule for new versions and where to find the test versions (beta) to use to test their product. The location of the release schedule and the beta versions '''is no secret'''. Firefox 5, and all other versions, underwent several weeks of beta testing, during which third-party developers (Google) had an opportunity to do their testing and make necessary changes to make their product(s) compatible. In addition to the 4 weeks of beta testing for Firefox 5, Google has had an additional 19 days since the release of Firefox 5, to make their product compatible. '''Ask Google what is keeping a compatible release from being introduced.'''
'''Google MAY be ceasing support for their toolbar in Firefox.''' See the list of supported browsers in the following:
*http://www.google.com/support/toolbar/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1111588#toolbar_info
'''An add-on that may help''' 
Many users have found that installing the following add-on will restore some (maybe all) functionality for Google's toolbar.
*'''''Add-on Compatibility Reporter''''': https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/

Similar Messages

When will you make Firefix compatible with Google tool bar?

Clicked your update in error. Now can't use Google toolbar.
When will you fix your browser

You have it backwards. Google (and other 3rd-party vendors) must make their products compatible with the browser.
'''Some Background Information''' 
Included with every Firefox extension is a file named install.rdf. In that file is a parameter "em:maxVersion" which indicates the maximum Firefox version with which the extension '''has been tested and approved by the developer''' (Google, in this case). Only the developer (Google) is responsible for changing that parameter. Firefox enforces that parameter.
That said. Google and all other developers know where to find the Firefox release schedule for new versions and where to find the test versions (beta) to use to test their product. The location of the release schedule and the beta versions '''is no secret'''. Firefox 5, and all other versions, underwent several weeks of beta testing, during which third-party developers (Google) had an opportunity to do their testing and make necessary changes to make their product(s) compatible. In addition to the 4 weeks of beta testing for Firefox 5, Google has had an additional 19 days since the release of Firefox 5, to make their product compatible. '''Ask Google what is keeping a compatible release from being introduced.'''
'''Google MAY be ceasing support for their toolbar in Firefox.''' See the list of supported browsers in the following:
*http://www.google.com/support/toolbar/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1111588#toolbar_info
'''An add-on that may help''' 
Many users have found that installing the following add-on will restore some (maybe all) functionality for Google's toolbar.
*'''''Add-on Compatibility Reporter''''': https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/

When will iPhone 5 be compatible with Brazilian internet 4G

I live in Brazil and would like to have an iPhone 5. But (what I thought unthinkable) I got to know it's not compatible with Brazilian internet 4G. When will iPhone 5 be compatible with our 4G? Is Apple doing anything about this? I see no point in buying an expensive an state of the art phone and not to be able to use it with 4G. And about other devices like iPad and iPod?
Thank you.

We don't know. However, what Apple knows and is willing to share regarding 4G/LTE compatibility is found here: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1937 (updated recently).

When will you make an IPad YouTube app. There is one for iPhone and when you use it for the iPad the quality is bad since you have to zoom in. Please fix

When will you make an IPad YouTube app. There is one for iPhone and when you use it for the iPad the quality is bad since you have to zoom in. Please fix

If you lost sounds for keyboard clicks, games or other apps, email notifications and other notifications, system sounds may have been muted.
System sounds can be muted and controlled two different ways. The screen lock rotation can be controlled in the same manner as well.
Settings>General>Use Side Switch to: Mute System sounds. If this option is selected, the switch on the side of the iPad above the volume rocker will mute system sounds.
If you choose Lock Screen Rotation, then the switch locks the screen. If the screen is locked, you will see a lock icon in the upper right corner next to the battery indicator gauge.
If you have the side switch set to lock screen rotation then the system sound control is in the control center if you are running iOS 7. Swipe up from the bottom of the screen to get to control center . Tap on the bell icon and system sounds will return.
If you are running iOS 5 or iOS 6, the system sound control is in the task bar at the bottom. Double tap the home button and swipe all the way to the right in the task bar to get to the speaker icon on the left side. Tap on that and the sounds will return.
If you have the side switch set to mute system sounds, then the screen lock can be accessed in the same manner as described above.
This support article from Apple explains how the side switch works.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4085

Re. update to v.8.0.1, I will update to it when you make it compatible with Copernic Desktop

I have communicated this before and got no answer. I use Copernic Desktop all the time and so do lots of people. It is a top-reviewed 3rd party application. You shouldn't develop a new Firefox version (saying that it should be installed urgently) if it conflicts with such widely used software as Copernic. Telling us that Copernic will be disabled until THEY provide a compatible version is more than a little bit arrogant, and also inconvenient for us your customers.

Why is it Copernic "that has to make it compatible"? Why can't Firefox develop new versions with an eye on compatibility with major 3rd party applications? Was Copernic (and others) advised that Firefox was developing a new version that would be incompatible with them? If so, how far in advance were they advised?
Why is Copernic the one that has to make it compatible? Is it the "big bully in the schoolyard" explanation? (along the lines of the joke "Q: Where does King Kong sit? A: Anywhere he wants.") I'd be careful with that one. Microsoft got in a lot of trouble for bringing out new versions of Windows and IE that were incompatible with their actual or potential competitors. As for timing - however long Firefox has been out their first announcement of it had the "install Firefox 8.0 but we will disable Copernic Desktop when you do" warning with it.

When will CS3 be fully compatible with Leopard?

I haven't read any definitive answers to this question.
Adobe says when Acrobat 8.1.2 Pro is released in late Jan08: Leopard FAQ
But the 8.1.2 update this month didn't say anything about Leopard...
Does anyone know? We've been waiting to migrate to 10.5 for a couple of months now and CS3 is the last hold-up.

I understand CS3 came out before Leopard. But Leopard is a whole new operating system, they give core developers like Adobe months and months to make their software workable for the new OS. Third party developers always take alphas and betas from the OS builds, do they not? Is it the requirement that Apple make each and every software piece compatible with it's OS? So, they in essence have to do the third party's developer's work?
Further, if it's not compatible, then what grounds does Adobe have telling customers that it is. That would be a lie, then, wouldn't it? I'm just sayin. And I don't have Leopard OR CS3 yet, but I sure don't like the fact that Adobe is being pretty quiet about these issues--it takes someone some digging to figure this out, then they find engineers who are basically claiming it's not compatible, and to wait for likely 18 months until 10.6, and if I were Adobe's legal dept. I'd probably delete this post.
As far as *everyone* having issues, it doesn't seem to be the case--I am reading several threads where many have figured it out. Maybe I'll be lucky.
I can certainly see if Apple changed the specs (I'm not sure what this means, do they not provide seeds to you?), Adobe having a LOT to complain about. But I have not seen evidence of this other than an Adobe engineer calling the OS Buggy. Proof?
I think Apple being quiet about it is that they don't allow their staff to blame others in blanket statements on forums in direct contradiction to what they warrant in writing the software to be compatible with. Usually things like these come from press releases or a kb. Or Steve Jobs <g>
Buko, your blanket statement about CS3 being perfect in Tiger doesn't seem to wash. A quick look through the Apple forums and the forums here pretty much show that not to be the case. What seems to be clear is that Adobe's registration and auto update program are the problem. I won't go so far as to say they are poorly written and executed, but the scores of people who have had and continue to have numerous issues IN TIGER certainly point in that direction.
I suppose we could blame Apple for that, too?

When will creative labs become compatible with AAC fil

I've been using itunes to upload music and I wanted to know when creativelabs will be compatible with the itune friendly AAC files.

Time to rip this post apart.
<<I'll hand it to you for persistence, although I don't know why you CONTINUALLY try to disrupt a tech forum for Creative with pro-Apple BS.>>
Pro-Apple BS? How was pointing out that AAC is an open format pro-Apple? It's not. Don't make up things. All I did was point out that AAC is open and that it can be played on any OS, or any MPEG-4 compatible software or hardware.
<<AAC is a proprietary format. It is, as you should know, based on the audio specification for MPG4, which came out over 6 years ago. Dolby Labs controls the licensing of this format, the codec and the chips to decode and encode it. The fees are substantially higher than those for WMA, and of course, than MP3.>>
Stop getting your information from that post on Napster that I debunked MONTHS ago. I proved that wrong and you know very well that it's wrong. Anyway, Dolby does control the licensing for MPEG-4 AAC, yes. However, licensing fees are not anything like you or that Napster post said. I provided information back then, so you can go back and look for yourself, if you're still choosing to throw your money away on Napster. If licensing fees are so bad, then why are there so many freeware players that play AAC files? MPEG-4 AAC files! Why? Why can I download a FREE operating system (Linux), and use completely free software to rip and play AAC files? Exactly. iTunes is freeware you know. Why can I download it for free and rip and play AAC files? Surely Apple isn't going to front the bill for millions of people to use iTunes to just rip, organize, and play their music.
<<AAC is not the logical successor to MP3. If only WMA or AAC are considered, then WMA is the clear winner in that race. >>
How is WMA the clear winner? Besides the fact that WMA sounds noticably inferior at any bitrate.... Even HE-AAC mops the floor with WMA9 Pro at low bitrates. Anyway, how is WMA the clear winner? AAC compatible digital audio players control *90%* of the hard dri've market, 43% of the flash market, and a combined total of over *70%* of the entire market. Let's not forget that the number one online music store, which controls over 70% of the market, uses AAC as it's format of choice, and the next biggest online store behind very distant number 2 Napster is using AAC as well. Soon Napster will be launching a "music to go" rental service that targets ALL platforms. Can you guess the file format of choice? AAC
<<In fact, WMA9 Pro is under consideration for the next generation "CD" compression. This, along with DVD-A and SACD. Note there is nothing from Dolby under consideration at all. >>
hahahaha says who? Actually, since MPEG-4 is part of the HD-DVD and Blu-Ray specs, AAC is already part of the deal And, right now, SACD has the same market penetration that CD at the same point in it's lifetime. So SACD is well on it's way to becoming the "next CD". As it looks right now, SACD will become the CD format of "tomorrow", while the iTunes Music Store is handling the current "CD quality" music business just fine. As it stands though, honestly, it will be a combination of two things. SACDs for audiophiles, and iTunes-like downloads for everyone else.
Also, Dolby only handles the licensing portion of AAC. AAC was developed by a number of companies, including Sony. Sony has a stake in SACD, blu-ray, and any optical disc technology that comes out. So I can guarantee you that they will not let AAC die, even if it kills their precious atrac3/atrac3plus format.
And another thing to consider is that the recording industry wants a standard across all platforms for digtial music downloads. And considering 70% of the market is AAC compatible, and by the end of this year, a certain online music store will have passed over $b in total revenue, you can imagine which format will win.
<<Even assuming the original poster meant he wants to load non-DRM ("Fairplay") tracks on his Creative player, it will not likely happen so long as Apple is intent on blocking 3rd parties from using purchased iTunes songs on any other player.>>
What does iTunes purchased songs have to do with AAC files ripped from anyother source? Exactly. Using Apple is an excuse for companies to not support AAC. It's their loss though. If Creative would support AAC, they would have opened themselves up to the market of millions of people who do use iTunes and Real Player 0+ to rip their CDs.
<<It is unlikely Creative will spend the license money for a purpose so limited as self-ripped AAC files when there are other free alternati'ves to somebody ripping their own CD's.>>
How are AAC files limited? AAC files can be played and ripped on any platform. If you want to talk about limited, you have to look at WMA. It only works under one OS and only certain players can play it. And what free alternati'ves are there? MP3 licensing isn't free. WMA licensing isn't free. If you're selling a player for profit, you HAVE to pay for WMA and MP3 decoding capabilities.
<<AAC is a good-sounding compressed format, but for mass acceptance it will always remain a niche unless Apple opens things up and Dolby lightens up on their expesi've licensing.>>
Mass acceptance? AAC has already been accepted by the masses. Over 350 million songs sold in AAC, and 70% of the digital audio player market is AAC compatible. I think players that DON'T support AAC are currently in the niche market
<<Something good like Oog Voorbis has a better chance of becoming the successor to MP3, I think, and even that remains a niche at this point. >>
Ogg Vorbis will never replace MP3s. First off, the sound quality isn't as good as AAC. Secondly, Ogg Vorbis requires a processor with a FPU. FPU require more battery power, so battery life is affected significantly. And most importantly, there are no CONVENIENT Ogg Vorbis encoders. Not to mention Ogg Vorbis still has a lot of bugs that need worked out. They only recently worked out a bug that was causing significant high end distortion that greatly affected the sound quality of the files. Plus Ogg Vorbis has no DRM container.
Also, transcoding a file degrades the sound quality significantly.

When will you give adobe flash player in apple store?

hi friends how to play flash videos in iphone?

It's highly unlikely that Apple will ever support Adobe Flash. Apple supports another standard for video and refuses to, even temporarily, compromise. That' s one of the downsides to going with the iPhone or iPad over other devices.

When will Firefox 6. be compatible with Blackboard?

Your newest version of Firefox will not allow me to login to Blackboard. I am an instructor using Blackboard to teach online. The previous version worked well with Blackboard.

1. Firefox 4.0 includes the Sync feature, not need for the Firefox Sync extension.
2. Check with Nokia for an update for whatever Ovi Suite uses to interface with Firefox, like an extension or plugin. Addon developers are responsible for keeping their stuff compatible with Firefox updates.

When will firefox 4 be compatible with adobe acrobat x pro?

I am missing the convert icon from Adobe Acrobat X Pro when I upgrade to Firefox 4, so I had to go back to the earlier version of Firefox.

You will need to ask Adobe about this, they will need to update their add-on to make it work.

When will you make iOS app ADOBE VOICE and ADOBE SLATE for iPad usefull for iPhone too ?

I want to use Voice and Slate on my iPhone : will it be possible soon ?

I've also noticed that crashes increase with hand-animations, especially with embedded sounds. I think the reason behind this is that Macromedia in its latter year or so started a trend that Adobe has continued: to emphasize the performance of objects created and managed through code over ones created and managed on the timeline.
I find that version control is a great way to handle this. Even if you aren't set up to use a central repository and don't want to be, both Git and Subversion support local repositories that will give you revision points to go back to without copies all over the place. If that's too much overhead, Dropbox also keeps a revision history and I have heard/read that you can go back to previous versions you have stored there. However, I don't know the specific details of how it works.

When will you fix adobe flash?

Flash keeps crashing my browser and causing huge lag times. I must use Blackboard collaborate and I noticed that my instructors computer was exhibiting the same symptoms. Get your act together. start addressing your crash reports. Don't release crap and then fix it at my expense. Be professional.

A lot of the time you are getting the settings because that is the way the author set it up. In general, you get what the author sets or the defaults in the program. You have some choice of selections in the preferences and that is it. You sure are complaining a lot for having spent no money on a product. Actually there is Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat. There has not been an Adobe Acrobat Reader for almost 10 years.
In contrast, there are all sorts of problems with WORD also. Forms in WORD often have problems related to changing page size and such unless you are using the defaults in WORD 2007 (basically turning off printer metrics) and as far as I know you can not submit a WORD form. So there are pros and cons to all software. In terms of the handtool, it is usually on by default. That is why one individual ask what you right clicked on the document for and then selected the handtool. We all have issues with part of Acrobat (what this forum is about), but it meets a lot of needs better than other products.
If you want to request changes, then you need to be sure you are using the product correctly and then address the problems to Adobe, not to users of a different product. We (or better the Reader forum) would be glad to try to help you use the product correctly or solve problems. That is why these forums exist.
Have a good week.

When will Bridge CS6 be compatible with 5DMKIII files?

Lightroom is right. Why not Bridge? Tired of DNG conversion.

Lightroom is right. Why not Bridge? Tired of DNG conversion.
To my knowledge this is already the case.
Be sure to have the latest ACR (7.1) installed. Open PS and under the menu Photoshop check about Plug in and see if you have ACR 7.1 installed. If not update and you should be OK
By the way, LR and Bridge/PS use the same ACR engine and I don't understand your objection to DNG. I convert all my files to DNG to great satisfaction, using Adobe Photodownloader for this including rename, back up and metadata template in one go.

When will you make a GOOD new version of Firefox?

I chose Firefox over other available browsers because it had features others lacked. I chose it because it was ''different''. Now, I've tried the "latest and greatest" updates since...and I hate them. I hate everything about them. I hate the way they look. I hate the features that have been removed. I hate a lot of the features that have been ''added''. I hate that they're imitating Opera and Chrome. ''If I wanted Opera or Chrome, I would '''use''' Opera or Chrome!'' I am sick to death of popups trying to pester me into "upgrading" to a browser that I see as a huge step down in '''every way'''. All I want is a browser that's like the one I chose to begin with, with some improvements. Not massively overhauled, and ''certainly not'' with functions I am accustomed to using removed.
''Edited by a moderator due to language. See the [http://support.mozilla.com/kb/Forum+and+chat+rules+and+guidelines Rules & Guidelines] .''

Words cannot express the amount of bodily harm I would like to inflict upon you for that moronic statement.

I tried to install seo spyglass errror message said not compatible with mozilla firefox. When will mozilla make spyglass cpmpatible?

tried to install seo spyglass error message said not compatible with mozilla firefox. When will mozilla make spyglass compatible?
I need this plugin for my affiliate business and enjoy using firefox.
Seo spyglass may work with IE but I'd rather use firefox

tried to install seo spyglass error message said not compatible with mozilla firefox. When will mozilla make spyglass compatible?
I need this plugin for my affiliate business and enjoy using firefox.
Seo spyglass may work with IE but I'd rather use firefox

When will you make adobe compatible with Dreamweaver

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for