Where is file size displayed in PSE?

I recently took a Photoshop class (not PSE) and saw that the original file size and the current size (which grows with each edit) is always shown in the lower left corner. I like that. Does PSE do this as well? Thus far I have only seen the image resolution info, but not file size (as measured in MB).
thanks.

No, the file size (document sizes) shows the size of the file once it is
saved. This is megabytes and using a psd for saving the file.
It's just an estimate of the file size.
The number on the left shows the size with all the layers flattened into one.
The number on the right shows the size with all the layers intact.
I guess these numbers are really just for reference, since the actual size once saved
varies with the format used for saving.
I think the max file size for elements in pixels is 30,000 x 30,000.
A normal photo might be 3,000 x 2,000 pixels, so most people would
hardy ever have a file of 30,000 x 30,000 pixels.
MTSTUNER

Similar Messages

HT1338 Why isn't the file size displayed for software updates in the App Store?

Why isn't the file size displayed for software updates in the App Store?
My only internet connection is a tether to my iPhone.
My limited bandwidth forces me to manage my data consumption - I am forced to "google" the file size of the software update so I can decide if I have the headroom in my data plan to take advantage of the update.

If you click on the name of the Application in your Updates Available list,
it will take you to the update Imformation for that App.

ITunes 11 - where is "Track Size" displayed?

iTunes used to have a column that showed the size of each file. Very helpful for my purposes. However I can't find that column in iTunes '11. There was also a column that showed what the file type was (AAC, AIFF, etc.) which was also handy. How do you find this info in the iTunes interface now?

Click on Songs (located next to Albums, Artists, Genres...) while you browse your iTunes music library, the right click on title bar (where column headers are displayed) and chose from the menu that appears the information you want to see (i.e. Size if you wish to see the file size and Kind if you need to see the file type)

Any way to change file size display to NOT use GB or MB notation?

I'd like to see exact byte counts for file sizes from time to time in the windows listing files (without having to Get Info). I've searched for options to change how file sizes are displayed by finder but have come up completely empty. Any chance this choice has not been completely co-opted from me by Apple's omnipotent designers?

Welcome to Discussions.
I believe there are 3rd-party applications that do it, such as [WhatSize|http://www.id-design.com/software/whatsize] and perhaps also [Path Finder|http://www.cocoatech.com].
/p

File size display issue in DM 2?

I'm seeing some flakiness in the file sizes shown in the new Desktop Manager. I have a nominal 8GB card, which DM shows as 7.5GB. It shows 778MB Used, 5.6GB Music and 16384PB free (a petabyte is 10^6 gigabytes, so this is 16,385,000 terabytes).
"[b][URL=http://www.rsoutlet-4u.com/rosetta-stone-portuguese-c-4.html]Rosetta Stone Portuguese[/URL][/b]
[b][URL=http://www.rsoutlet-4u.com/rosetta-stone-russian-c-15.html]Rosetta Stone Russian[/URL][/b]"

Finder often takes it time updating the file size. When the ZIP starts, it creates a small file, because it doesn't know how big the result will be. When it finishes, it closes the file with the correct size, but is neglecting the sending of a notification to the Finder, so the old file size is still displayed. When you do something that forces the finder to look at the file again, it corrects the display of the file size.
(The large size is correct, because MPEG, MP#, JPEG, etc. files are already compressed, so cannot be compressed much more.)

Incorrect files sizes displayed in the finder

My early 2009 iMac with 4GB Ram, 650Gb HD, running OSX Snow Tiger (latest version) is showing incorrect file sizes for many things. For example, a 4.21GB DVD will show on the desktop as being 4.58GB... any thoughts??

Snow Leopard misrepresenting file sizes: Apple Support Communities

File sizes displayed in Bytes?....

Since upgrading to Lion, when I try getting info on a folder/file, the size used on the disk or filesize is displayed in Bytes (with GB's in parantheses afterwards). This seems unintuitive to me and makes it a little less easily apparent what the filesize is. Is there any way to change this? I have looked around with no luck so far....
Thanks!
ex:

hmmm I don't think you are understanding what im saying.
Lets say I have a file that is 10GB. In most situations, I'd say its easier to say its a 10 gigabyte file than say its a 10000000000 byte file. If my friend asked me how big the file was, I would say "oh its 10 gigs" not "its 10000000000 bytes"
That's the point of having different units (bytes, kilobytes, megabytes, gigabytes, etc) it abbreviates it, and makes it a more managable number. Spedometers don't display your speed in inches/hour for a similar reason.
So back to the original question. I'd much rather see GB (or MB or whatever the largest unit is) BEFORE bytes as that is used FAR more often and easier to understand. Im pretty sure almost everyone would agree with that...
yes, I can still see the information I want, its just not as readily apparrent now and I'd rather see it before bytes. Am I the only one who thinks swapping the order of this information was kind of counter intuitive?

Display file size

i'm trying to get the file size displayed in the finder. i can right click on an individual file to 'get info' and find the size, but can the size be displayed routinely in the finder?
i tried to 'view options' but 'size' and 'calculate size' are greyed out and cannot be checked.

Are you talking about the results of Spotlight searches? If yes, see this tip
<http://www.macosxtips.co.uk/index_files/add-columns-to-spotlight-search-results. php>
If no, post a screen shot.

File sizes in iTunes are still in Mebibytes not Megabytes

The file sizes displayed in the "Size" column, and in the "Status Bar" at the bottom if more than one track is selected, are still showing Mebibytes, whereas the Finder displays file sizes in Megabytes ever since Snow Leopard was introduced in August, 2009.
If you insist on display Mebibytes then you should use the correct abbreviation of "MiB" (not MB) after the size figure to save confusion. Or you could follow Donald Knuth's proposal and use the MMB suffix.
It would be more consistent to mimic the changes to Finder and correct this. Otherwise users might get confused when the Finder tells them they have enough space on a Memory Stick or external disk drive to copy some selected track(s) but when they try to do so then the copy doesn't fit. For instance, Finder says the destination has 21.0 MB available, iTunes says the selected track is 20.1 MB, and the copy fails because it is really 20.1 MiB which is actually 21.077 MB.
The best way is to just alter iTunes to display true Megabytes (1,000,000 bytes). If it was a good idea for Finder then it's a good idea for iTunes, even if it is 5 years late.

Pete Stonebridge wrote:
The file sizes displayed in the "Size" column, and in the "Status Bar" at the bottom if more than one track is selected, are still showing Mebibytes, whereas the Finder displays file sizes in Megabytes ever since Snow Leopard was introduced in August, 2009.
If you insist on display Mebibytes then you should use the correct abbreviation of "MiB" (not MB) after the size figure to save confusion. Or you could follow Donald Knuth's proposal and use the MMB suffix.
It would be more consistent to mimic the changes to Finder and correct this. Otherwise users might get confused when the Finder tells them they have enough space on a Memory Stick or external disk drive to copy some selected track(s) but when they try to do so then the copy doesn't fit. For instance, Finder says the destination has 21.0 MB available, iTunes says the selected track is 20.1 MB, and the copy fails because it is really 20.1 MiB which is actually 21.077 MB.
The best way is to just alter iTunes to display true Megabytes (1,000,000 bytes). If it was a good idea for Finder then it's a good idea for iTunes, even if it is 5 years late.
Pete,
As I am sure you know, it is quite common in all kinds of computing to refer to Mebibytes as Megabytes. You are correct that this is not quite correct, but the difference is small and people are used to it. The Finder point is interesting, but around 85% of iTunes installations run on Windows.
However, you can make your suggestion known directly to Apple via the iTunes Feedback page:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html

File size more than 50 MB

Hi
I have a scenario where my file size is 50 MB. I have to split the file and then do the processing . whats the best approach
venkat

Hi
Splitting the file before it enters XI would considerably reduce the load on XI.
please refer the following links
/people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2006/03/05/managing-bulky-flat-messages-with-sap-xi-tunneling-once-again--updated
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/11/29/night-mare-processing-huge-files-in-sap-xi
Also check this valuable thread where size related issue is discussed Re: Reg :The Maximum size of a file that can be processed

File size in predefined searches

Is it not possible to have the file size displayed in predefined searches?
Thanks for any help...rob

Understood. See http://www.pinkmutant.com/articles/Leopard/leospot.html for info on Leopard's Spotlight and my mod to Finder's Find at http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=6725932 for what you can change so you can find stuff.
If you want to report this to Apple, send bug reports and enhancement requests via its Bug Reporter system. To do this, join the Apple Developer Connection (ADC)—it's free and available for all Mac users and gets you a look at some development software. Since you already have an Apple username/ID, use that. Once a member, go to Apple BugReporter and file your bug report/enhancement request. The nice thing with this procedure over submitting feedback is that you get a response and a follow-up number; thus, starting a dialog with engineering.

File size vs. storage size

I'm confused about the size of my jpg. file. when i go to "image size" and open it, it shows up as 9.1 MB. When i go to "get info" it shows up as 2.8 MB . WHICH is it???? The jpg. is flattened, so this is not referring to a layered file. very confusing! thanks for any insight you can provide
patti

Patti:
When opened in Photoshop (PS), file size is shown as the uncompressed file size of the PS image, including layers, layer masks, extra channels, etc. The "get info" file size is the size of the file as stored on disk, using JPG compression, ZIP compression for channels and masks, or even LZW compression for TIF files.
These two sizes will always be different. In general, you should care more about the "get info" size, as that will fill up you hard drive. But the file size displayed in PS will affect PS's performance, so it is relative as well.
J

File Name of Image Displayed in PSE 8 does not match File Path Name in Windows 7

I recently got a new computer .I upgraded on my Windows XP computer from PSE 5.0 to PSE 8.0. I then moved my files to the new computer running Windows 7 following the instructions I received on an earlier post. I copied the catalog folder and the picture folders on the C drive from the old to the new computer (catalog folder to location specified in System Info; images to My Pictures).   Everything appears to have worked beautifully without having to go through a big Reconnect struggle. The organzer appears to have found all of the images and I can bring them up in Editor as well. However, when I look at the properties of a given image the full file name displayed is what it was on XP, i.e., C:\Documents and Settings\<username>\My Documents\My Pictures\<folder name>\<file name> rather than the path as it is in Windows 7, i.e., C:\Users\<user name>\My Pictures\<folder name>\<file name>. I am new to Windows 7 so maybe I am missing something unique to Windows 7 but I would appreciate any information.

You're observing the special folder aliases that Vista and Windows 7 create to preserve backward compatibility (Microsoft keeps changing how and where users' documents are stored).   On Windows 7:
C:\Documents and Settings\<username>\My Documents\My Pictures
is a special kind of alias to the folder:
C:\Users\<user name>\Pictures
(And C:\Users<user name>\My Pictures is yet another kind of Windows 7 special alias, a "library", that includes the folder C:\Users<user name>\Pictures.)
Whenever an application like PSE refers to the old location, C:\Documents and Settings\<username>\My Documents\My Pictures, Windows automatically translates that under the covers to C:\Users\<user name>\Pictures.   But Windows Explorer is configured to prevent you from accessing C:\Documents and Settings\ interactively -- only programs like PSE are able to do that. Microsoft wants users of Windows Explorer to always use the "new" name, C:\Users\<user name>\Pictures.
In your case, your catalog contained the old XP folder paths, and Windows is automatically translating them on the fly to the new paths, unbeknownst to PSE.
Like most such backward-compatibility hacks, this does not work perfectly. PSE thinks that the old path and the new path refer to two completely different folders. I'm not positive, but I think there are opportunities for PSE to get confused by that.   When you import new photos, they will get recorded in the catalog under the new folder paths.
In my previous recommendation for how to move to the new computer, I had assumed that you would most likely be changing user names and photo locations, and thus you would be forced to do a Reconnect, and you wouldn't have encountered this. If I had thought you weren't going to need a Reconnect, I would have recommended not using this method but rather using Backup/Restore (my first recommended method) -- my bad.
It may well be that your current catalog and PSE will work well enough.   But there is at least a small risk that down the road PSE will get confused by the old and new folder names. The easiest way to avoid that risk would be to start over and use the Backup/Restore method for moving your catalog, whch is more effort on your part. But because I don't fully understand the risk, I can't tell you whether you should be worried about it.   Definitely do some testing: editing, importing and editing new photos, use Display > Folder Location view, try renaming and moving old photos to new folders, try the Photo Downloader, etc.

ACE4710 Show crypto files displays file size mismatch

For some reason when I compare backup and active ACE4710 certs size I have a size mismatch on 2 certs. I have done everything I can think of to elimanate this mismatch in size. I start off on the active with crypto import terminal xyz.pem which then a show crypto files displays as say 1800 then through a console session with putty I attach to the backup where i use the export from the master and run the same import command then show crypto file again where there is a significant file size difference. Could this be as a result of the serial connection versus the telnet session otherwise on the master? I know that the master is using the correct file size cert as it is up and tested where unless I do a failover to the backup I do not know the cert will work and as well crypto verify shows both sets match on active and backup? Right now I am in a warm standby state for ft as a result. Thanks.

Hi,
Figured out a fix. What I later came to realize is that I had originally uploaded through FTP the key and cert pem as one file which then the system seperated (with an ultimate file size based on this procedure) did not later match my copy and paste import file size for the two already seperate files. As well I was very carefull about white space and verify was done on both active and backup ACEs and the key pair in question. I was able to fix the problem by exporting from the copy and paste version and then re importing to the other device also through the terminal then use the new ones in the SSL proxy config for the pair in question. Then delete the FTP uploaded cert and key.Thanks for your help.

Where is the image file size???

Where is the image file size in LR3? I can't see it anywhere neither in the Library module, nor in the Develop module.

As far as I know Lightroom does not display the file size. Keep in mind that LR never makes changes to the Original files that you import.
When you export a file with LR edits the file size generated will depend on the edits applied and the size and quality settings you choose in the export dialog.

Where is file size displayed in PSE?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for