Where is Ship-to Address getting generated ?

Hi,
I want to know where the ship-to address number is coming from.
If you go to BBP_PD, and Partner 27, there you can see one field ADDR_NR.
I am not able to find in the debug where exaclty this field is getting populated.
Please help.
Thanks,
Vaibhav Goel

sorry i have confused here in PDP scenario
BBP_PARTNER_FUNCTION_TO_TYPE - this FM
Laurent and richardo is correct.
ship to address can be inheritd from organisation structure and it can be created and address number is the key needs to be supplied in organisation structure.
or
ship to address can be entered manually while creating shopping cart - extra one entry added in ADRC table
but every time it creates crmd_partner guid for reference and stored in partner function 27.
           Partner_Fct    Description                    Partner_No
0000000001 00000016       Requester                      4A813CEB04E41A03E10000008E0A0253
0000000001 00000020       Goods Recipient              4A813CEB04E41A03E10000008E0A0253
0000000001 00000027       Ship-To Address               48317AB1464D6CCBE10000008E0A1567
0000000001 00000075       Location                       4831525145E10125E10000008E0A156B
Do you want to know which FM used to determine partner function 16,18,27,39 etc... determination
Partner Processing
Through partner processing, the dynamic structure of the partner functions is formed for the different business transactions in the SRM system. In this way, an internal employee can adopt the partner function Requester or Goods Recipient when creating a shopping cart.
The partner functions Vendor, Vendoru2019s Contact Person, Requester, and Goods Recipient appear in the header or item documents of a purchase order, for example.
A semantic and syntactic check of the entered data is performed automatically in partner processing.
Amongst other things it checks whether the business partner may adopt the assigned partner function.
Muthu

Similar Messages

  • Ship to Address in the Global Outline Agreement PDF

    Hi All,
    We are creating GOAs. When a GOA is Released an email is sent with a PDF attached. In the PDF attached there is the section "Ship-to-address" on the top right part of the sheet but is showed without content (only the description Ship-to-address is displayed but below where should be the content it is empty).
    Does anybody know from where the system take this information?
    Thanks in advanced!!!
    Mar

    Hi
    Please have a look at the following OSS notes, which might help.
    Note 925530 - Smartform BBP_SC - delivery address is blank
    Note 828263 - Default delivery address cannot be changed manually
    Note 1003059 - TTE tax calculation: Error on change of ship to address
    Note 1022048 - BBPSC03: Ship-to address gets cleared off
    Note 953657 - BBP_POC: Ship to address cleared during change of PO item
    Note 956119 - Ship-to address for shopping cart using public template
    Note 752612 - JavaScript error in address management and partner maint.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • "Ship To Address" details missing in the SC and subsequent documents

    Hi All,
    We have a strange situation.
    There is no "Ship To Address" details in the shopping Cart and its subsequent documents.
    This happens only for some shopping carts.
    As per my understanding "Ship To Address" is a mandatory partner information without which the Shopping cart should not be created at all.
    Can anyone please let me know the possible reasons for "Ship to Address" not being present?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mayank

    Hi Mayank,
    Have a look at the following OSS Note:
    Note 738534 - Ship to address disappears when product category is changed
    Note 953657 - BBP_POC: Ship to address cleared during change of PO item
    Note 1022048 - BBPSC03: Ship-to address gets cleared off
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

  • Ship to address in SC

    Hi,
    can any one say if it's possible to enter the ship to address other than maintained in system. we are on SRM 5.0. when any other adreess details are entered in the name field and any other fields in the ship-to details, system message Partner SHIP-TO-ADDRESS not found appears.
    Thanks

    Hi
    As Yann told, Please ensure that the user creating the Shopping cart is consistent and the same for the Org plan (using PPOMA_BBP - Consistency check).
    <b>Few other SAP OSS notes to refer in this case.</b>
    <u>Note 828263 - Default delivery address cannot be changed manually
    Note 1003059 - TTE tax calculation: Error on change of ship to address
    Note 1022048 - BBPSC03: Ship-to address gets cleared off
    Note 953657 - BBP_POC: Ship to address cleared during change of PO item
    Note 956119 - Ship-to address for shopping cart using public template
    Note 752612 - JavaScript error in address management and partner maint.</u>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • MV45AFZZ - Looking for Ship-To Address

    Hello... I trying to put a check to detect where the Ship-To address has being manually change during SO creation. Does anyone knows what tables in MV45AFZZ store the ship-to address? Thanks in advanced.
    Regards,
    Norman

    >
    Sie Thuang Lim wrote:
    > Hi guys,
    >
    > thanks for the suggestions. However, I am looking the a table that contains the full address (e.g. name1, name2, name3, name4, city, postal code, etc...). My user exit is to check and see whether did user change any of the fields, if yes, a pop-up will appear asking them certain questions. Table KUWEV has only name1 which is not enough. Thanks.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Norman
    Did you even bother to look at the defined internal tables in SAPMV45A? I just did and found internal table XVBADR.

  • Ship to Address changed

    Hello SRM Guru's,
      SRM 5.0, Classic Scenario.
    Basis had just implemented support stack 10, and the Ship to address is getting changed when the PO is created in R/3, using plant address to determine the Ship to address. We had setup different delivery addresses in SRM and this appears a shopping cart is created but the information is different in R/3 PO.
    Can anyone tell me why this is happening and how it could be fixed?
    Many Thanks

    Hi,
    Pls see the foll notes:
    <b>Note 767461 - Transfer of ship-to address to back-end system</b>
    Note 887832 - ECS: Split for delivery addresses missing in purchase order
    Note 1022048 - BBPSC03: Ship-to address gets cleared off
    BR,
    Disha.
    <b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

  • SD : Ship to party and bill to party address getting changed in sales order

    Dear All ,
    We are facing a problem in production client regarding Ship to party and bill to party address getting changed at the sales order level. First of all , i would like to discuss the sales business process in which the problem is getting faced.
    Step 1 : The sales order is created for machine with all relevant details and the ship to party and bill to party address is changed as per the business requirement.
    Step 2 : The outbound delivery is created with reference to sales order.
    Step 3 : The commercial invoice, intercompany invoice and excise invoice is created.
    Step 4 : The Credit memo request is created with reference to commercial invoice no.
    Step 5 : The Credit memo is created.
    Step 6 : The FOC value contract is created with reference to credit memo.
    Step 7 : The FOC release order is created with reference to value contract, where ship to party and bill to party address is changed as per requirement.
    Step 8 : Outbound delivery is created for realse order.
    Step 9 : The FOC invoice is created.
    The problem is the moment we change the address in step 1 , the system gets in manual mode. Hence, whenever Bill to party and ship to party address is changed at Step 7, the same gets replicated at the machine invoice level which is incorrect.
    Please comment / reply ASAP.
    Regards.

    During the manual change if you  want to assign a new address number (which
    prevents the changing of the address in the preceding document),
    you can use Note 97832 (modification).

  • Wrong query is getting generated in WHERE NOT EXISTS  with group by clause

    Query is getting generated wrongly in where not exists section when i use group by function.Please prvoide me any clue to over come the problem.
    /* DETECTION_STRATEGY = NOT_EXISTS */
    INSERT /*+ APPEND */ INTO STG_ETL.I$_DCMT_TIMEZONE_LOOKUP
         TZ_OFFSET,
         ADT_CRT_DT,
         ADT_UPDT_DT,
         IND_UPDATE
    SELECT * FROM (
    SELECT      
         to_number(KOFAX.RECEIVED_TZ)     TZ_OFFSET,
         min(sysdate)     ADT_CRT_DT,
         min(sysdate)     ADT_UPDT_DT,
         'I' IND_UPDATE
    FROM     ESTG.FLAT_FIL_DMS_KOFAX KOFAX
    WHERE     (1=1)
    And (KOFAX.LD_DT = ( select MAX(LD_DT) from ESTG.FLAT_FIL_DMS_KOFAX INNER
    where INNER.ENGAGEMENT=KOFAX.ENGAGEMENT
                   and INNER.KOFAX_FILE_NM = KOFAX.KOFAX_FILE_NM
                   AND INNER.IM_CUST_ID = KOFAX.IM_CUST_ID
              and INNER.BATCH_ID=KOFAX.BATCH_ID)
    AND
    (TO_DATE(KOFAX.LD_DT)>=TO_DATE(SUBSTR('#WAREHOUSE.P_EDW_LAST_RUN',1,10),'YYYY-MM-DD'))
    And (substr(KOFAX.RECEIVED_TZ,1,1) <> '+')
    Group By to_number(KOFAX.RECEIVED_TZ)
    ) S
    WHERE NOT EXISTS (
         SELECT     'X'
         FROM     EDW.DCMT_TIMEZONE_LOOKUP T
         WHERE     T.TZ_OFFSET     = S.TZ_OFFSET AND
         )

    Easiest fix for you would be to change the detection_strategy on the IKM from NOT_EXISTS to either :
    MINUS
    -- Try this out, it should work, it will give the same data through the equiverlant steps.
    NONE
    -- This will load all incoming data into your I$ table, there will be more rows to crunch in the following 'Flag Rows for Update' step, it might give incorrect results potentially - you will have to test it.
    So try MINUS first, failing that, see if NONE gives you what you want in your target.
    Are you inserting only new data or updating existing data?

  • How to get the Customer detials in Purchase order Ship To Address

    Hi Friends,
    While doing the back-to-back order, when raising the PO, I want populate the Customer Name, Contatct Person and Address in Ship To address box. Can anyone please suggest a good query which can do that. I looking to create a formatted search based pon that.
    Regards
    Shiva

    Shiva,
    You can start with this:
    SELECT T0.CardName, T1.Name, T0.Address2
    FROM ORDR T0 INNER JOIN OCPR T1 ON T0.CntctCode = T1.CntctCode
    WHERE T0.DocEntry = $[POR1.BaseEntry] AND T0.ObjType = $[POR1.BaseType]
    Please bear in mind, it is a FS based on the rows so will run only on row level.
    Regards,
    Nat

  • Query to get intermediate ship to address in r12

    Hi ALL,
    How to get intermediate ship to address in R12.
    Thnaks

    Hi;
    Please review:
    Question Regarding Creating Intermediate Ship To Address Using Api [ID 1269646.1]
    Intermediate Ship-To Address Functionality [ID 603168.1]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Ship-To Address not getting picked for one particular user

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    I am working on SRM5.0 system with ECC6.0 as backend.
    For one particular SRM user, the Ship-To address number which has been maintained in his attributes through transaction PPOMA_BBP, as default delivery address, is not populated when he creates a SC.
    This default ship-to address is not seen while creating the cart even though the address can be found via the F4 search help in the same SC.
    Can anyone tell me why this is happening for one particular user?
    Please note that this problem is occuring even when the user is shopping for self and creating a new SC (no copying from template). So SAP note 1055203 is not valid in my case.
    I have checked the ADRC table, and this address number exists. Infact, when I assign this address number to some other user's Ship-To attribute, this default delivery address is picked in the SC.
    So, I understand that the problem is not with the address, but with the linking of this address number to this user. I even tried deleting and re-assigning the address number in the attribute to this user. But, it doesnot work still.
    Can anyone help me out?
    Thanks n Regards,
    Ancy

    Ship to address not being picked from attributes for any user it was being picked from Org address data , and I had reset the value
    now , when I am trying to create a SC and I have tried to add delivery address  bby 2 types .
    1. By adding through the portal
    2> i have tried to add the same throgh ppomabbp in user attributes "Delivery address"
    I have also made it default however when I raise the SC it again shows me as blank :
    I am not too sure how do I populate the value that I need . Please see below still the delivery address is blank !!

  • Error while updating Ship to Address on Sales Order form

    hi ,
    A user is trying to update the ship to address on a standard sales orders screen, this is pretty common and never caused any issues. However with one particular order the user gets the following error :
    "You cannot update Ship To Location; the standard value rule set prevents override. "
    This is an Oracle shipped message and not custom code. The message name is OE_SEC_UPDATE_VIOLATION whose text is : You cannot update &ATTRIBUTE; &REASON
    Seems like REASON is the message : OE_SEC_SV_VIOLATION, whose text is
    " the standard value rule set prevents override. "
    This is a message shipped by Oracle Order entry. I am not able to locate this message since the oracle shipped files are not available to us and this is not in any database code(i searched the code)
    Does anyone know when this message is thrown. It seems like some value set error but am not able to figure out where it is being set.
    Any help in this will be appreciated.
    Thanks

    Did you check if any Processing rule is defined for Ship to location update :
    Setup> Rules > Security > Processing constraint ?
    Maybe this order matches condition that prevents this field from being updated.

  • FI Doc not getting generated at the time of Asset GRN

    Hi,
    We have created Asset Purchase Order.
    At the time of GRN, FI Doc is not getting generated.
    What changes need to be required from MM side (in OBYC)
    Regards,

    HI PK,
    whether your PO Item have Single Account Assignment or it is Multiple Account assignment.
    Check Distribution in Accoun Assignment Tab at PO item level.
    If it is Single account Assignment, then Accounting Document will be generated at GR where if it is Distributed then, no Accounting Document will be generated.
    In your case, Probably it would be distributed. and as a result of this your PO Item is marked as 'GR non valuated'.
    Check its Delivery Tab. If it is the case, then need not worry as it is std practise. system will treated it as multiple account assignment and its valuation will only be carried out Invoice Verification level.
    Later on check the Material document also.
    Pls Note:
    If flag 'GR non-valuated' is set in the purchase order, the valuation is only executed through the invoice verification. This flag must be set if the purchase order has multiple account assignment.
    A valuated goods receipt for a purchase order with account assignment generates a posting line for the consumption account 'Account-assigned purchase order' (KBS) and for the GR/IR clearing account WRX.
    hope it address your issue.
    Regards,
    S Anand

  • How to make ship to address fields mandatroy while creating sales order

    Dear forum Members,
    My client oraganizes trade shows and hence ship to address vries everytime when sales order is entered for the same sold to party.So one times ship to customer is used in the sales order and address is entered at sales order level. Please note that at master data level all address fields are suppressed for one time customer.Hence there is no question of going back to one time customer account group and making any field mandatory.
    While changing address for ship to at order level, there are few fields which are mandatory, for example city is mandatory. I also want to make zip code and region as mandatory.where is this controlled?Please note that this is not account which controls this. i have already done lot of r&d on account group and transaction variants which are not controlling these fields at sales order level.

    Hi Kanwal,
    Only incompletion procedure will not suffice for your requirement.
    You need to make the field mandatory wherein, if you dont enter, system will not allow you for enterin further fields. For this you should do the following:
    Goto transaction SHD0, you will get a screen where you need to enter you Tcode "VA01"
    Below you define a transaction variant (starting with Z).
    On the next tab you have Screen Variant. Here you enter screen variant name, program name & screen number.
    Then you click on create.
    Its like as if you are doing some kind of recording. Finally you will reach to the screen where there are options available to make the field mandatory.
    For your reference the program is SAPMV45A screen number is 4001.
    Further screen are self explinatory.
    Hope this should solve your requirement
    Regards,
    Dhananjay

  • Issue in Ship To Address.. URGENT

    Hi All,
    We added Ship to Address Form in Ship To Page in iStore . 115.10.2
    If I click on 'Continue Checkout' button , then it redirects to same page wiht the following errors
    Address Line 1 is required Field and
    Province is Required Field
    Please any one help me in this regards, this is very high priorty issue for me
    Thanks

    To my knowledge iStore is a JSP based Application where most of the coding is in Java or JSP. I dont think the issue is related to OA Framework.
    Coming back to your case, you would need to check the code that gets triggerred on click of the Continue button. From a functional point, you need to enter the required fields mentioned before proceeding. So it doesnt look like an issue at all.
    Regards
    Sumit

Maybe you are looking for

  • Creation of a PCR for calculation of LTA

    Hi Experts, I have an India Payroll requirement where i need to write a PCR with the below conditions: 1)      The Employees would be eligible for the LTA from the very first month of their Service as per below conditions: a)      All active employee

  • Where clause on portal queries

    we'd like to apply a 'where clause' on the 'query' option of a portal form based on a table. Is there a generic procedure we can use in the pl/sql event handler block to do this? I've seen p_session.set_value used in the generated package with parame

  • Po creation with restricted PO value

    Hi, MAybe this is a stupid question but.... We would like to have that "secretary's" could create just po's under the 1000 EUR value. Is there any standard way without userexit conected with this? If we created a new type of PO, can we restrict the m

  • Does the Pocket Projector by Brookstone work with the iphone 5?

    Does the Pocket Projector by Brookstone work with the iphone 5 ?

  • Disk space allocation and FileVault

    I recently had an issue with disk space in my home folder which I would like to share because it might be applicable to quite a few private (non corporate) users. The matter has been resolved, just wanted to let you know that you should be VERY CAREF