Where is the in-built update function?

Iam told that I need to update my Firefox. Where is the automatic update?

Hi mhodge,
You should take a look at the Knowledge Base article [[Updating Firefox]]. This will explain all of the steps involved in upgrading to the latest version.
There have been some changes in the latest builds, so you might want to look at [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/common-questions-after-upgrading-firefox-36 this article] that answers common questions people usually ask after upgrading.
Hope this helps!

Similar Messages

Hi, updated my iphone where in the middle of updated the screen showed i must connect to itunes. after connecting iphone was updated but everything was deleted. was first time on itunes , so have no backup. can i recover my pics and contacts? please help

hi, updated my iphone where in the middle of updated the screen showed i must connect to itunes. after connecting to itunes my iphone was updated but everything was deleted. was first time on itunes , so have no backup. can i recover my pics and contacts? please help

If this has happened more than once the problem is likely on your PC.
See here: http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/assistant/itunes/

Where is the Bookmarks backup/restore function ?

Where is the Bookmark backup/restore function ?

wchapgm: Please ref cor-el's response. Pretty informative.
And, Thank You both for your kind attention and assistance.
Lastly, note that there seems 2-B another issue.
The backup file format used in the older version isn't recognized by the new version !
So, unless I can find a work-around, I'll have to resort to some "manual transfers" of those resources.

TS3212 Where is the support or updates for Windows 8??????????????????????

Where is the support or updates for Windows 8??????????????????????

What "support" or "updates" are you looking for? If you're having problems, perhaps if you post details, someone here can help you sort things out.
Regards.

Go Daddy UCC Certificate: "ExRCA can only validate the certificate chain using the Root Certificate Update functionality from Windows Update"

Hello,
I have this issue regarding certificate chains while performing Outlook Anywhere connectivity test
by Microsoft Remote Connectivity Analyzer:
"ExRCA can only validate the certificate chain using the Root Certificate Update functionality from Windows Update. Your certificate may not be trusted on Windows if the "Update Root Certificates" feature isn't enabled."
Note: even if I got the error, Outlook Anywhere and
ActiveSync services work fine.
Environment:
- Exchange 2007 with SP3
- Go Daddy Multiple Domains UCC certificate (up to 5 Subject Alternative Names)
I already read and followed instructions on this TechNet post
Can I safely ignore this warning about the SSL cert? Using GoDaddy UCC cert but it is a little bit different by this case.
So after an investigation I understand the issue above is related to SSL certificate
Certification Path (see screenshots below).
NO ERRORS on ExRCA checking
Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority is under Intermediate Certification Authorities
repository
Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authority is under Intermediate Certification Authorities
repository
Starfield Technologies (http://www.valicert.com)
is under Trusted Root Certification Authorities repository
ERROR on ExRCA checking
Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority is under Intermediate Certification Authorities
repository
Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authority is under Trusted Root Certification Authorities
repository
Can you add some useful information ?
I'm opening a support ticket at Go Daddy; I hope they could me some positive feedbacks.
Regards,
Luca Fabbri
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees, and confers no rights.

Strange I have a feeling the exrca tool can't validate the godaddy class2 root authority due some older compability and wants to use the older original root authority valicert owned godaddy. Or when the exrca tool is validating the root CA it only has the
goaddy class2 root ca that was issued by valicert and not the standalone cert when doing the comparision. I sent the question to MS and will let you know when I hear back.
You can get rid of it
https://certs.godaddy.com/anonymous/repository.seam
Download the cert
◦gd_cross_intermediate.crt
Then import it into the trusted root cert authority on your CAS boxes. Then you need to delete the other godaddy class2 root authority. Make sure you see the one you imported both will be named goaddy class2 root authority but one will be issued by valicert.
Re-run the test and it will go away, I also saw the error with my domain as well using godaddy and got rid of it by using the new cert authority.
James Chong MCITP | EA | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+ Security+, Project+, ITIL msexchangetips.blogspot.com

Where did the iPhone Calendar list function(s) go with iOS7? The Calendar has gone all 'spread sheet' on me and definitely not user friendly. Please advise.

Where did the iPhone Calendar list function(s) go with iOS7? The Calendar has gone all 'spread sheet' on me. If you select an item (grey dot) from the month display it will open up the 'spread sheet' at the current time of day, not necessarily when the calendar entry takes place. I liked iOS6 where you could turn your iPhone to landscape mode and get that special 'spread sheet' feel if that's what you're into. Has a 'List' presentation been removed from the iPhone Calendar with iOS7?

The List view is displayed by tapping the Search magnifying glass.

HT1420 Where is the "authorize this computer" function?

Where is the "authorize this computer" function in the iTunes store?

There's a couple of ways to get through to the authorisation controls in the 11.0.x versions.
The control is in the Store menu, but first (if you're using iTunes versions 11.0.x) you might need to bring up the menu bar to see the Store menu.
If you're using 11.0.x, click on the wee boxy icon up in the top-left corner of your iTunes to see the "Show Menu Bar" control, as per the following screenshot:
Then you'll find the control in the Store menu:
Altrenatively, if you don't want to bring up the menu bar, it's still possible to get into the authorise controls via nested menus accessible from the wee boxy icon. Here's a screenshot of where to find them:

Where is the bookmark all tabs function?

I recently updated from a very early version of FF to 13.0.1 and the bookmark all tabs in the Bookmarks menu is gone. I always use that function so i desperately need it.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you!

The "Bookmark All Tabs Function" didn't dissapear. It was... NEEDLESSLY REMOVED by some very unwise and unthinking individuals.
There is No RATIONAL Reason to do away with a highly useful function that MILLIONS of Firefox users ALREADY Knew How to Find, and WERE ALREADY USING, without ever having to think about it. !
Anyone New to Firefox will (logically) look under "Bookmarks "on the "Menu Bar " for... Things that Relate to Bookmarks. This ORIGINAL Layout was... Simple, Logical, Obvious, Intuitive, and Easy to Find !
Switching to Control+Shift+D is... NOT Simple, or Logical, or Obvious, or Intuitive. AND, I had to... WASTE CONSIDERABLE TIME trying to Find how to get the functionally that was in Firefox... From The Beginning, and Used By Millions of Users.
I trade stocks online (daily) and I USE a "Screen Capture" app Multiple Times a Day, Which ALSO USES Control+Shift+D to make a Screen Capture. So, when I Need to Save Multiple Tabs, I now have to shut the screen capture app down, do the Control+Shift+D, and then open the screen capture app again.
All of this because the people at Firefox have become Downright COMPULSIVE about FORCING... NEEDLESS, CONFUSING, Un-Thinking, Mindless, and Destructive changes to the Layout and Functionality of the platform that causes MILLIONS of Users to... WASTE MILLIONS of MAN Hours to try to figure out how to use something that... They Already Knew How to Use !
In searching for a solution to this Needless Problem, I ran across a forum where people were Needlessly searching for a solution to this Man Made Problem, the "Moderator" gives the Control+Shift+D "Solution", Offers No Rational for the Needless Change, and then gos on to say that He Will Be GLAD when this functionality is... REMOVED COMPLETELY !
I assume that the management at Firefox would like to have their browser as widely accepted and used by "Enterprise" as possible. If so, this sort of un-thinking Change just for the sake of change, needs to... Stop.
I have run two national companies, and I can assure you that I would Go To Considerable Lengths to AVOID Any Software that my company would have to PAY employees to stop constructive work just to constantly Re-Learn how to use the software, not to mention Endless Updates and Bug Fixes. There can be very large sums of money involved in such Avoidable Wastes of Productivity. These are some of the reasons why companies go so long before "updating" to new Microsoft releases, whose stock has been flat for yhe last 10 years. ( and is now facing some Real Competion.)
The Firefox people are always pushing updates, which are good for security reasons, but the unending changes to the GUI and the Functionality are Not Appreciated. They are despised for very real and rational reasons.
If you will through your own forums, and do a few web searches, you will find that users around the world have gone from looking forward to Firefox updatees (in the early releases), to avoiding them like the plague, or switching to other browsers completely.
Someone once said: "If it ain't Broke, Don't Fix it."
Someone else said: "The only thing worse than Being Wrong, is... Staying Wrong."
I'm saying that if you find that you have shot yourself in the foot...
1. Stop Shooting... IMMEDIATELY !
2. FIX Your Foot
3. Take SERIOUS MEASURES to Make Certain that You DON'T... Shoot Yourself in the Foot Again !
Give the users a Firefox that they are Comefortable With and don't have to Constantly Mess With, and you will be will on your way to wide Acceptance, and Loyalty by everyone, including the "enterprise" world.
Leave the "tweaks" alone. These can be supplied by your Ad-on community, and the users will either accept them or not. The Customer is always right.
NEVER, EVER, EVER, REMOVE a FUNCTIONALITY Unless it is a SECURITY THREAT ! You WILL Make a LOT of People Mad if you do, and you will Destroy what Loyalty that hasn't already been lost.

Where are the regular maintenance updates?

Most expensive/professional software I own licences for
receives maintenance updates and bug fix patches on a regular
basis. Even with shareware and freeware, the patches and updates
just keep coming. Flash Professional should certainly be no
different, there's more than enough bugs to warrant some fixing.
But what did we get? Nothing! Some measly updates for the Flash
player, that's all. Clearly Adobe/Macromedia cannot be trusted in
this department, they just move on to the next project and leave
users to wrestle with bugs.
A few examples off the top of my head:
- The new smoothing algorithm introduced in Flash 8 is
kaputt. It blurs bitmaps even when they're shown in 1:1 scale,
anti-aliasing intentionally aliased stuff. Clearly there's some
rounding error or something messing with the scale of things. For
example, I used Flash 7 to make document and application icons in
128x128. They fit exactly to the pixel grid and when I exported
them from Flash 7 they were sharp as can be. When I export the same
icons to PNG from Flash 8 at 128x128, using the same source files,
the edges are suddenly blurred. With some trial and error I
discovered that I had to export them in 129x129 in order to make
them look as they did from Flash 7, then crop the picture in
Fireworks to 128x128.
- "Convert Lines to Fills" is a mess. It generates a
completely warped rendition of the selected lines if they overlap.
You have to walk Flash through the process by selecting a few lines
well away from eachother, move them away from the rest, convert to
fills, then repeat this process until you finally get a WYSIWYG
rendition of the lines you wanted to convert.
- Various UI graphics bugs. For example if you drag-select
across a number of layers and frames in the timeline and insert or
delete, leftovers from the black selection rectangle are still
visible in the timeline. You have to minimize/maximize the window
to make it redraw correctly.
- If I enter W/H/X/Y coordinates for an object, say "10.0",
it's because I want exactly 10.0. I don't want Flash to arbitrarily
change it sometimes to 10.1 or 9.9. Sometimes you have to enter it
twice to make it stick.
- Flash 'forgets' parts of audio files in the library. I
import a lot of WAV files to the library, and sometimes a few saves
down the line I discover there are mysterious silent gaps in the
audio. I have to re-import the files again to fill these gaps.
- FlashPaper (it installed correctly on very few computers,
you had to fix it in a DOS prompt, or FlashPaper would just hang
when you try to print). I've also had complaints that my FlashPaper
rendered PDF:s won't open in Mac OS X.
These are just a handful of examples I can think of at the
moment, I know I've stumbled upon dozens more and I'm sure there's
a collective pool of thousands. What I want to know is why
Adobe/Macromedia feels it's OK to not bother with maintenance
updates and fixes for a product of this price and magnitude? It's a
despicable business practice I would expect from shady vaporware
peddlers.

It's only your perspective that "nobody seems to care" that
couldn't be anymore incorrect - I see it
first hand how dedicated and caring the developers of flash
are.
I wont get into a platform war either - but i clearly
remember the MS promotion MS was using
claiming the new "Innovative" features of IE7 - specifically
showcases their new tabbed browsing
feature and popup stopper - FF had that long before them -
hardly innovative.
Vista looks and acts very much like Mac OS - at least on the
surface. It's so blaringly obvious to
me that they must have been studying OSX when they were
deisigning Vista.
Anyway - i dont really care about OS - and your points are
totally valid - I'm a PC user only
because flash always runs better on PC then MAC.
I just think your claims that nobody cares and complacency
within Adobe are ill-founded - I am very
much closer to the people that you are talking about and see
their dedication first hand for years -
unless you are as close or closer, it's hard for me to agree.
But if you feel this way from a users POV - then perhaps
something is wrong on a marketing level or
some other area. Flash 8 was developed by Macromedia - the
next version of flash will be developed
by Adobe - let's hold of on judging them until they come out
with the next version - until then,
complaints of non caring and complacency simply hold no
weight.
-regards
-c
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PitchBlank wrote:
>>I don't understand the logic of calling Adobe a
"monopoloy".
>
>
> It couldn't get any more logical, IMHO. Adobe and
Macromedia were the two
> biggest actors in the game, and have (had?) quite a few
overlapping products
> (Freehand/Illustrator, Fireworks/ImageReady/Photoshop,
GoLive/Dreamweaver).
> Then the two companies became one. While this doesn't
constitute a bona fide
> monopoly as such, it's pretty damn close. It's like
Microsoft buying Apple -
> right, so there's still Linux, but it's not like Linux
inspires competitors to
> innovate...
>
> > To be honest - I don't want a new set of tools that
do the same thing.
>
> Neither do I, but Adobe still needs competition or
they'll become more
> complacent than they already are.
>
> > MS is famous for duplicating (stealing) ideas from
others before them and
> calling it "innovative" (example; IE7, Vista).
>
> I don't recall MS ever calling IE7 innovative, and I
don't get this whole
> plagiarism thing with Vista. Where's the ripoff?
Gadgets? Apple stole that from
> Konfabulator. Instant Search? Apple implemented
Spotlight only *after*
> Microsoft had showed off their instant search. The
interface? I don't see
> transparent window elements prominently featured in OS
X, and Apple hardly
> invented the 3D look and feel with drop shadows around
windows. The Vista UI
> isn't a ripoff, it reflects the current fashion in UI
design. If bell bottom
> pants come back, both Lee and Levi's will make them,
without one ripping off
> the other. OS X features several Windows ripoffs (Time
Machine, Spotlight,
> automatic OS updates etc - and Microsoft had its Media
Player in place back
> when Mac users were still fiddling with crummy shareware
like SoundJam), but
> nobody wants to hear about those because they think
Steve Jobs is Jesus.
>
> Anyway, I don't want to get into the whole platform war
thing, my point was
> that Flash is buggy as hell and nobody seems to care,
especially not Adobe. I
> was expecting replies more along the lines of "No, it's
not buggy at all, it's
> flawless and you're a moron".
>

Where is the Picture-In-Picture function?

Hi,
where can I find the Picture-In-Picture function in the new version of iMovie (10.0) ?
In iMovie '11 (9.0) I only had to drag the clip over another one and choose the "Picture in Picture" option. How can I do this in the new version?
I hope you can help me!
Greetings from Germany.
Sören D.

Have a look at this thread:
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5474220
Matt

Checking the contents of update function module log table

Dear experts,
I created several CALL FUNCTION ... IN UPDATE TASK lines and is curious about the contents of the update function module log table. How can I see its contents?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Haris

Hi Hari,
Use transaction SM13. This gives all the details
To view the details in SM13 switch on Update debugging before you call your update function module.
In debugger Settings --> Display / change Debugger settings --> Use the check box "Update Debugging" --> Press save button
So after COMMIT WORK statement, debugging will start with the update function module
During this time check the entries in SM13
Once the update is complete the entries will be removed from SM13 (Unless there is a failure)
I am not sure if there is option to view records in SM13 for which update is complete (No authorization to change settings in SM13). So i cannot check this
Regards
Rajvansh
Edited by: Rajvansh Ravi on Jul 24, 2011 3:52 PM

Hey, Verizon! Where's the 7392 (security) update???

Has anyone else noticed that the phone finds no updates for the 7392 (May) security update?

M-Kohlman wrote:
hopmedic wrote:
ArnettH_VZW wrote:
Hello hopmedic,
May I ask what type of device you have? I'm a little unsure as to what you are asking? May I have you elaborate.
Thank you...
The Verizon Trophy - the only WP7 device you have (This is the Windows Phone forum)
The 7392 update is the security update that Microsoft pushed out at the beginning of the month. This phone doesn't have it.
hopmedic,
Given the quality of Verizon's reply here I thought I'd provide some kind of update:
First the Good News:
Microsoft has a dedicated page that provides regular updates on where the carriers are at with WP7 updates at any given time. The page is located here:
www.microsoft.com/windowsphone/en-us/features/update-schedule-usa.aspx
As of this evening, MS has added the status for Build 7392 (which is the build that updates the certifcate issue)
Now the Bad News:
Verizon is not yet on the list for U.S. carriers. After asking around the understanding that I've been given is that Verizon is not yet "testing" the 7392 Build for the trophy and therefore they are not yet on the list. Supposedly they will be added to the U.S. carrier update page "soon". Until then I would not hold my breath.
For those that are new to the MS Update Policy for WP7, let me try to provide a brief overview:
Microsoft's update policy is something of a middle-ground compromise between how Apple handles their updates (i.e. Apple controls the process and pushes out the updates when they are ready to do so) and Google (which does updates of the O/S and leaves when (or even if) those updates get pushed out by a carrier of manufacturer.
In MS's case, they push out the updates (like Apple), BUT they don't push the update out until the carrier gives the go-ahead to do so. Carriers have the ability to "skip" ONE update, so they are not required to do every update that is released, but they must never be more than 2 revisions behind whatever is the most current version that is compatable with the Phone's hardware.
So, for example, Verizon could choose to "skip" 7392 on the Trophy if they wanted to but if they choose to do so, they will have no choice but to release Mango the Trophy when it is released. Or they could do 7392 here in the near Future and then choose to skip Mango (though that would be unlikely). So far no carrier has excercised this option, but it is in the agreement that MS has with the carriers and manufacturers.
And last, just like all Windows Desktop and Server "service packs", all WP7 updates are cumulative, so 7392 would also include all the updates in 7390 and 7008, even if those two updates where never installed to your Phone.
- Michael
Ah - I had forgotten about the update status website. Thanks.
As far as cumulative updates, it's not quite like that. I have updated two Samsung Foci, and both did the same thing the first time I hooked them up: Installed the Feb update, installed NoDo, then installed 7392. They were three separate updates, not all wrapped in one. I believe by cumulative, they mean that when you install 7392, for instance, 7390 will install prior to 7392, so you will get all the updates.

My firefox beta 12 using Linux platform does not update to firefox RC1 via the "check for update" function. I know windows' beta version had this fixed, when would Linux get similar support ?

Current platform : Linux
Current firefox version : Firefox 4 beta 12
Issue : does not update to RC 1 using the check for update feature.
Background : previously downloaded beta 8 and then it automatically updated to beta 12 using update features but for RC1, it does not.
I know users under Windows platform had same problem but was resolved and they can now update via check for update feature.
Please implement for Linux users too.
Thanks !!

If you can't update then you can download and install the full Firefox 4 RC version.
* http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all-beta.html

Where is the implement of fork() function?

I have great interest in the implement of fork() function, but after downloading the source file, I can't find the exact file. Can anybody tell me which file should I look?

Hello.
No. The first answer was what you are looking for:
scalls.c contains the following lines:
#pragma weak fork = _fork
pid_t
_fork(void)
return (_private_forkx(0));
}The "#pragma weak fork = _fork" means:
If there is no other library defining a "fork" symbol then "fork" is equal to "_fork". This allows other libraries to "overwrite" "fork".
(This "overwriting" can be done when loading the executable and the .so files.)
Martin

Where is the search on site function on the ipad with the new ios 7

ever since the last system update I can not find the search on this site funcion. it used to be next to the url now it is gone. anyone found it yet?
thanks

It doesn't really work. when I tap on the URL and then on the x right next to it and type in something I go straight to google and what I typed in is searched on google.
What I need is to be on a website and search for a word in it like with ctrl+f

Where is the in-built update function?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for