Where is the linux patch ?

I've searched OTN for the patches for Linux, but the only ones I can find are to do with security, where is this 8.1.5.0.2 patch that everybody keeps referring to ?
null

In the Oracle technet website, choose
Technologies, then linux, then O8i,
then o8i for linux, there will be a
link for patches as well as the readme
file.

Similar Messages

Where is the Linux x86_64 version of acroread?

I downloaded "the" Linux version and I got 9.5.1 (?) but it was for 486 hardware. No sign of the 64-bit version anywhere I looked.
This is 2012 and most of the Linux world has moved to modern hardware CPU's. 486 is not in that set.
Please, add-to or replace, your Linux version(s) to include the 64-bit version of the acroread binary.

Adobe aren't developing the *nix Readers any further. I hear. Version 9 will be it.

Where are the Linux kernel parameters?

I have successfully installed ORACLE on red hat linux 5.0
even though I didn't set the kernel parameters.
On Solaris these parameters can be set in the /etc/system file.
Where do you set SHMMAX and the kernel parameters in linux?
I could not find a similar file.
Please enlighten me.
Thank You
Be careful with environment variables!
run the root.sh script after installation!
null

Frank Westheider (guest) wrote:
: Mark Lee (guest) wrote:
: : I have successfully installed ORACLE on red hat linux 5.0
: : even though I didn't set the kernel parameters.
: : On Solaris these parameters can be set in the /etc/system
file.
: : Where do you set SHMMAX and the kernel parameters in linux?
: : I could not find a similar file.
: : Please enlighten me.
: : Thank You
: : Be careful with environment variables!
: : run the root.sh script after installation!
: Hi Mark.
: You have to install the Kernel-Sources and Include-Files.
: Just look in
: /usr/include/asm/*shm*.h
: and change the parameters. After this re-create the kernel with
: cd /usr/src/linux
: make clean && make dep && make && make modules && make
: modules_install
: and install the kernel-file (lilo/bootlin....).
: Ciao
: Frank Westheider
You might want to follow this thread (it's on the previous page
of threads):
Kernel Parameters?
From: Bolen Coogler (guest)
Email: [email protected]
Date: Mon Oct 26 16:00 CST 1998
The Oracle install instructions mention setting various kernel
parameters, such as:
SHMMAX 4294967296 (0x100000000)
SHMMIN 1
SHMMNI 100
SHMSEG 10
SEMMNS 200
SEMMNI 70
SEMMSL
While setting these parameters is VERY important in HP/UX or
Solaris, I haven't the slightest idea if this is really applies
to Linux. Does anyone know if tweaking these and other kernel
parameters matters in Linux? If so, where do you make these kind
of changes? (/usr/src/linux/include/linux/<something>.h ?)
My initial impression is the Oracle on Linux documentation is
converted Solaris boilerplate (i.e. %s/Solaris/Linux/g).
null

Oracle XE, where are the security patches? ( Pete Finnigan)

http://www.petefinnigan.com/weblog/archives/00000973.htm
Good that somebody worry about Oracle XE users security. I must agree with Pete that "its not a good idea to expose it to the internet even via a web based application". What do you think about Oracle XE security?

Is there a legitimate concern here or is this an "Open ended write me an essay" question?
~Jer

When will Creative recognize the linux opportuni

Just bought a Zen Touch. Pretty nice device, but where
is the linux commitment?
Why am I forced to use an OS(M$), that has nothing to
do with the MP3-Player to operate it's
Although I'm already use kzenexplorer, libnjb I definetly
would like to see firmware/bugfix and development support
from Creative for non M$ OSes.
Cheers,
origin_de

Thanks PeeBee and penguinking3,
I actually use libnjb and kzenexplorer on SuSE 9.3.
The point I wanted to make is
a) that libnjb is reverse engineered without the help
of Creative.
b) that firmware updates take into account that there are
other OSes and therefore should provide bug fixing and
feature enhancements without being forced to use M$.
c) that the linux opportunity is there for Creative
to also differeciate themselves.
HP recognized it with their printers as lots of others did, too.
It just needs to open up the protocol for Creative to
leverage this market for almost no additional cost, as the
linux community is going to develop it's own management software.
The argument of cost over M$ doesn't get any better the
more often it is being used.
I strongly hope that some Creative representati'ves read this
here, too and take hopefully take action.
origin_de

HT1620 where are the patches that are being discussed all over in the media??? i have an iphone and ipad and had no APPLE updates for a long time.

where are the patches that are being discussed all over in the media??? i have an iphone and ipad and have had no APPLE updates for a long time.

Thank you... one would think that if Apple needed to push out something so important they would make it more obvious!!!

Any chance to see the linux-vserver patch included in kernel26 ?

Hi,
Is there any chance to see the vserver patch is included in the kernel26 or kernel26ck some day ?
I often use it (am I the only one ?) and I'd love to be able to use it out of the archlinux box.
Thx and congrats for the work.
Last edited by arno (2007-06-21 11:22:04)

Sorry, I can get into more details :
Lazily quoting the http://linux-vserver.org web site :
"Linux-VServer provides virtualization for GNU/Linux systems. This is accomplished by kernel level isolation".
The main advantage over Qemu, Virtualbox or Vmware, is that there is only a very little performance loss for the virtual hosts. Virtual hosts, which all are linux hosts are isolated from eachother, no hardware emulation is done. You can see it like a kind of "super chroot/jail".
Basically, this is composed of two parts : a kernel patch, ans some userland utilities. The kernel patch (http://ftp.linux-vserver.org/pub/kernel … 0-rc3.diff) applies easily against a vanila kernel. The linux-vserver guys follow very well the kernel updates and I've been applying the patches for several versions now, without problem.
Userland apps have already been ported for Archlinux (http://oldwiki.linux-vserver.org/ArchVserver), even if they look a little outdated and can't be found on the archlinux.org package search engine.
The only hitch is the need to build a home-maid kernel.
I thought this patch inclusion could be of someone else's interest.
What is Archlinux kernel patch admittance process ?
Do you provide only vanila kernels ?

Where is the oracle linux 6.4 installation screenshots documentation ?.

Hello
Some questions.
1. Where is the oracle linux 6.4 installation screenshots documentation ?.
2. Is the disk layout documentation/swap sizing information listed in documentation ?.
I have 8GB memory installed on a 64 bit machine
I want to install the swap partition at the end of the disk.
I want to install oracle 11gr2 database software as well.
--Cheers Glenn
oracle otn
(11.2.0.1.0)
Edited by: Avi Miller on Apr 17, 2013 3:30 PM to remove download links.

The installation guide available at https://linux.oracle.com/documentation/ may require some updating. Last time I checked, chapter 16.16.5. Recommended Partitioning Scheme, did not include the swap space required for hibernation mode.
It is mentioned here:
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html
Swap space size recommendations issued for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 differed from the current recommendations, which were first issued with the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3 in June 2012 and did not account for hibernation space.

Where is the information about "Patch Level" of a particular version

Hi all,
Where I can see what is the latest "Patch level" of a particular version of tuxedo. For example, what is the latest patch level of tuxedo 9.1, where I can find it out?. This information is public ? We need a oracle contacts?
thanks in advanced

MBriz,
The number at the start of last line in $TUXDIR/udataobj/patchlev is the Tuxedo patch level. (If there is no $TUXDIR/udataobj/patchlev file, then you are running the General Availability version of Tuxedo.)
This information is also available by executing "tmadmin -v".
A third way to get the information is to look at the first line printed by the BBL in the userlog on a particular day, which will be something like "09-30-2010: Tuxedo Version 10.3.0.0, 32-bit, Patch Level 041". (Other processes' first ULOG message of the day will indicate the Tuxedo Version, but will not include the patch level.)
Regards,
Ed

Where does the source code of linux reside in arch

Just wonder where is the source code. In freebsd, all the source code is in /usr/src, does arch have that directory? or do I need to install something to get source code?

tomk wrote:Arch does not install the source code for anything. Under /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-ARCH, you will find the kernel headers required for building other apps, but apart from that, if you want the source code for the kernel or any of the apps, you need to get it from the relevant website/ftp server/etc e.g. kernel.org for kernel source.
no, those headers in there are for kernel modules only. the headers for applications are a sanitised copy based on 2.6.12 and exist in /usr/include/linux.
As for the source to Arch packages, we have something similar to fbsd's ports system (ports is on fbsd isnt it or am I wrong), it's called abs:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ABS#The_ABS_tree

Where does the BPEL project goes when deployed to a Linux server?

Hi,
Where does the BPEL project goes (I need the path) when deployed from JDeveloper into a Linux server?
Also I would like to know the file name. We have been searching for a *.jar file but we cannot find it.
Please help.
Amorsolo

And also, one zip file with size 0KB get created under$ORACLE_HOME$ \integration\esb\oraesb\deploy.
This will be named *'bpelservice_+<yourdomainname>+_<processname>'*
Edited by: Arjun_M on Sep 10, 2009 6:13 AM
Edited by: Arjun_M on Sep 10, 2009 6:13 AM
Edited by: Arjun_M on Sep 10, 2009 6:13 AM

Where is the 64-bit Linux 12c agent??

We have a fresh clean install of 12c on a 32-bit Linux platform. I tried pushing out the agent (through 12c) to a host running 64-bit Linux. The remote agent install failed, as it would not take the 32-bit agent from the OMS host on the 64-bit remote host (the error message stated this).
I have tried both edelivery, and OTN, but neither has just the 12c (12.1) 64-bit Linux management agent (I was going to install manually, and then discover the hosts through the 12c OMS).
Where is the clean stand-alone version of the 12.1 management agent??
Thanks

Hi,
You can use (Setup > Extensibility ) Self Update to down load agent software.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24628_01/doc.121/e24473/self_update.htm#BEHBAGDB
Regards,
- Loc

OS 10.4.11 where is the patch for the latest security??

Where is the patch that Apple announced today? OS 10.4.11 I know it's an old Mac, but...

Well, 10.4.11 is not all that much suffering...I loved that system.
But now with the App Store and iCloud I am not sure I could go back
The new iMacs are sure nice...a little plug, if you want to be able to upgrade memory yourself be sure to look carefully at the 27" which lets you do that.

Where are the regular maintenance updates?

Most expensive/professional software I own licences for
receives maintenance updates and bug fix patches on a regular
basis. Even with shareware and freeware, the patches and updates
just keep coming. Flash Professional should certainly be no
different, there's more than enough bugs to warrant some fixing.
But what did we get? Nothing! Some measly updates for the Flash
player, that's all. Clearly Adobe/Macromedia cannot be trusted in
this department, they just move on to the next project and leave
users to wrestle with bugs.
A few examples off the top of my head:
- The new smoothing algorithm introduced in Flash 8 is
kaputt. It blurs bitmaps even when they're shown in 1:1 scale,
anti-aliasing intentionally aliased stuff. Clearly there's some
rounding error or something messing with the scale of things. For
example, I used Flash 7 to make document and application icons in
128x128. They fit exactly to the pixel grid and when I exported
them from Flash 7 they were sharp as can be. When I export the same
icons to PNG from Flash 8 at 128x128, using the same source files,
the edges are suddenly blurred. With some trial and error I
discovered that I had to export them in 129x129 in order to make
them look as they did from Flash 7, then crop the picture in
Fireworks to 128x128.
- "Convert Lines to Fills" is a mess. It generates a
completely warped rendition of the selected lines if they overlap.
You have to walk Flash through the process by selecting a few lines
well away from eachother, move them away from the rest, convert to
fills, then repeat this process until you finally get a WYSIWYG
rendition of the lines you wanted to convert.
- Various UI graphics bugs. For example if you drag-select
across a number of layers and frames in the timeline and insert or
delete, leftovers from the black selection rectangle are still
visible in the timeline. You have to minimize/maximize the window
to make it redraw correctly.
- If I enter W/H/X/Y coordinates for an object, say "10.0",
it's because I want exactly 10.0. I don't want Flash to arbitrarily
change it sometimes to 10.1 or 9.9. Sometimes you have to enter it
twice to make it stick.
- Flash 'forgets' parts of audio files in the library. I
import a lot of WAV files to the library, and sometimes a few saves
down the line I discover there are mysterious silent gaps in the
audio. I have to re-import the files again to fill these gaps.
- FlashPaper (it installed correctly on very few computers,
you had to fix it in a DOS prompt, or FlashPaper would just hang
when you try to print). I've also had complaints that my FlashPaper
rendered PDF:s won't open in Mac OS X.
These are just a handful of examples I can think of at the
moment, I know I've stumbled upon dozens more and I'm sure there's
a collective pool of thousands. What I want to know is why
Adobe/Macromedia feels it's OK to not bother with maintenance
updates and fixes for a product of this price and magnitude? It's a
despicable business practice I would expect from shady vaporware
peddlers.

It's only your perspective that "nobody seems to care" that
couldn't be anymore incorrect - I see it
first hand how dedicated and caring the developers of flash
are.
I wont get into a platform war either - but i clearly
remember the MS promotion MS was using
claiming the new "Innovative" features of IE7 - specifically
showcases their new tabbed browsing
feature and popup stopper - FF had that long before them -
hardly innovative.
Vista looks and acts very much like Mac OS - at least on the
surface. It's so blaringly obvious to
me that they must have been studying OSX when they were
deisigning Vista.
Anyway - i dont really care about OS - and your points are
totally valid - I'm a PC user only
because flash always runs better on PC then MAC.
I just think your claims that nobody cares and complacency
within Adobe are ill-founded - I am very
much closer to the people that you are talking about and see
their dedication first hand for years -
unless you are as close or closer, it's hard for me to agree.
But if you feel this way from a users POV - then perhaps
something is wrong on a marketing level or
some other area. Flash 8 was developed by Macromedia - the
next version of flash will be developed
by Adobe - let's hold of on judging them until they come out
with the next version - until then,
complaints of non caring and complacency simply hold no
weight.
-regards
-c
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PitchBlank wrote:
>>I don't understand the logic of calling Adobe a
"monopoloy".
>
>
> It couldn't get any more logical, IMHO. Adobe and
Macromedia were the two
> biggest actors in the game, and have (had?) quite a few
overlapping products
> (Freehand/Illustrator, Fireworks/ImageReady/Photoshop,
GoLive/Dreamweaver).
> Then the two companies became one. While this doesn't
constitute a bona fide
> monopoly as such, it's pretty damn close. It's like
Microsoft buying Apple -
> right, so there's still Linux, but it's not like Linux
inspires competitors to
> innovate...
>
> > To be honest - I don't want a new set of tools that
do the same thing.
>
> Neither do I, but Adobe still needs competition or
they'll become more
> complacent than they already are.
>
> > MS is famous for duplicating (stealing) ideas from
others before them and
> calling it "innovative" (example; IE7, Vista).
>
> I don't recall MS ever calling IE7 innovative, and I
don't get this whole
> plagiarism thing with Vista. Where's the ripoff?
Gadgets? Apple stole that from
> Konfabulator. Instant Search? Apple implemented
Spotlight only *after*
> Microsoft had showed off their instant search. The
interface? I don't see
> transparent window elements prominently featured in OS
X, and Apple hardly
> invented the 3D look and feel with drop shadows around
windows. The Vista UI
> isn't a ripoff, it reflects the current fashion in UI
design. If bell bottom
> pants come back, both Lee and Levi's will make them,
without one ripping off
> the other. OS X features several Windows ripoffs (Time
Machine, Spotlight,
> automatic OS updates etc - and Microsoft had its Media
Player in place back
> when Mac users were still fiddling with crummy shareware
like SoundJam), but
> nobody wants to hear about those because they think
Steve Jobs is Jesus.
>
> Anyway, I don't want to get into the whole platform war
thing, my point was
> that Flash is buggy as hell and nobody seems to care,
especially not Adobe. I
> was expecting replies more along the lines of "No, it's
not buggy at all, it's
> flawless and you're a moron".
>

[Solved]The linux kernel with build in bootloader?

First of let me apologize if I'm making no sense at all. This isn't really my area of expertise.
I just recently stumbled upon some rather interesting "news" about the linux kernel developers working to implement a an EFI/GTP (I think) bootloader in the kernel it self. I would very much like to know if this is actually true, I'd like to learn more and follow the development, but I haven't been able to find any relevant information, appart from the incomplete mailing list I stumbled upon.
I suspect that I'm simply using the wrong search parameters. Again, it's not like I know too much about what I'm doing.
In any case, if you have even the slightest idea what I'm talking about, please do guide me in the right direction.
Best regards.
Last edited by zacariaz (2012-03-01 20:02:04)

Gusar wrote:
litemotiv wrote:I was mainly thinking about a way to boot straight into Arch from rEFIt without chainloading grub/syslinux first.
Thanks to the info and links the.ridikulus.rat provided, I've now learned a bit more about this stuff (I'm probably still missing a lot ). Basically, rEFIt is a manager that launches bootloaders. With EFI_STUB, the kernel is it's own bootloader, so what you say is indeed possible - start linux from rEFIt without going through grub/syslinux. Well, it would be possible if there wasn't for one huge problem - rEFIt doesn't allow passing options, which is needed in this case. But that's where rEFIt's fork (rEFInd) comes into play.
Further, there are patches on the kernel mailing list that will make it possible for an EFI_STUB kernel to read options from a file. Then not even rEFInd will be needed. Strictly speaking it isn't needed even now, but you need to type the options manually on the efi shell, which isn't very convenient. Fun stuff all this, innit? . It's a whole new crazy world.
Cool, thanks for the pro-active research!

Where is the linux patch ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for