Which Cams Support AVCHD with HD acquisition?

Now that FCS2.01 supports AVCHD, anybody got a good 720/24p AVCHD cam that records to a hard drive or SD card?

No one?

Similar Messages

  • Which cameras are compatible with Photo Booth?

    Sorry if this is posted on the wrong forum but i couldn't find the Photo Booth forum.
    Where can i find a list of compatible cameras that work with Photo Booth?
    Or can someone please recommend some cameras?

    look on apples site for web cams compatible with osx or ichat should get you started.
    also see this thread http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1338439&tstart=50
    Message was edited by: tll123

  • Which cameras are compatible with the capture feature in adobe premiere pro?

    My son is making stop motion videos and wants to be able to use the capture feature on adobe premiere pro where you connect your camera via USB and can capture images on your computer through your camera. I'm looking into buying him a camera and am trying to find a list of digital cameras that are compatible with this feature, he has a small fuji camera now that will not let him do so.

    What the other users have said is correct. Premiere captures through FireWire or through SDI/HDMI via a 3rd party solution.
    For your situation I would say the best bet is to connect you camera to your computer via USB or use a card reader and copy the entire directory to your hard drive and ingest into Premiere via Media Browser.
    If you Google 'how to make stop motion in premiere pro' there are tons of great tutorials.
    Best,
    Peter Garaway
    Adobe
    Premiere Pro

  • Which camera to use with FCP

    Im new to HD cams but very familiar with FCP. Im looking into purchasing either the Sony V1U or the Panasonic HVX 200. Most of my shooting is done overseas on 2 week long shoots. What im trying to figure out is what you guys have found best for hard disk recording when using FCP or if there are any differences?
    This forum has helped me alot in the past. Thanks for all the help guys

    Panasonic is now selling Focus FireStore drives that record the P2 format to disk instead of expensive flash memory. The Focus drives used to be a nightmare in post, but with the P2 metadata and FCP6 doing Log & Transfer the clips no longer come in as FAT32 fragments just a few minutes long (they are stitched together at ingest). Get a FS-100-160 or two and bring a MacBook along with FCP6 to ingest to common FireWire drives each day to free up the FireStores. If you figured on spending a few grand on P2 cards you can get a lot more GB for your dollars with the FireStore drives.

  • What video camera will work with my macbook pro

    I want to buy a video camera but I am not sure which camera is compatible with my MBP, do you know a camera that allows me edit my home movies without converting them first?

    ATI HD 3870 - but I don't know that it will work with the new 2008 Mac Pros.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/Item_XLR8YourMac.cfm?ID=10876&Item=ATI100435928
    http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonhd3800/macpc/index.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper15.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper18.html

  • 60% of the cameras 'supported' in 3.2 that take video use AVCHD

    Of the cameras purported to be newly supported in LR 3.2, 8 shoot video. Of those 8, 5 use the AVCHD codec (and one of the remainders doesnt shoot HD). The 5 that use AVCHD include the LX5 and the Sony Nex cameras, both likely to be popular as compact cameras for those who normally use a DSLR.
    It seems a bit silly and shortsighted that Lightroom doesnt support AVCHD, when it is rapidly becoming the most popular format. Even the newest cameras that Adobe is trying to develop support for, the majority use a format that LR ignores.
    The problem will only get worse, as Nikon is reputed to be using AVCHD in its new DSLRs.
    At the very least perhaps new announcements could specifiy whether or not the full camera is supported, because when you tout video as a key selling feature of LR3 one might assume that a claim of supporting that camera would include more then just still images.

    Thronsen wrote:
    If you dont want video in lightroom, not sure why you are clicking on this thread.
    I want lightroom to work properly, where on earth did you get the idea I did not want video?
    Thronsen wrote:But just as a basic point of education, its alot more then 5 cameras that use AVCHD. Its 5 cameras just out of the 8 that LR recently supported.
    You mentioned 5, I am now more educated, thank you for that apologies to the other manufacturers of those cameras, I have shot video for many many years, but using professional equipment for TV, commercials and documentaries, I am not yet as familiar using with DSLR's to shoot video, compression is always an issue and ACHD does cause ugly artefacts, but it is plenty better than many of the prosumer  codecs.
    If you dont want to use your camera for video, thats up to you. But many people do, in fact apparently the highest growth segment of DSLR purchses are video people.
    I can't wait to get the new Canon 3D with even better video support than the 7D, Cant wait to use video commercially in the shoots I do.
    And Im pretty sure the LR staff, or at least Adobe disagrees with you. Video was one of the most important changes highlighted in virtually every piece of marketing material I saw. On the main LR page it was listed 3rd.
    I"m sure lightroom working properly was the 1st, I was talking about priorities.
    Finally, please dont make the same tired argument about how tough it would be to implement editing.
    so, its easy to write Final Cut Pro 7 for lightroom is it? Barely a tired argument.
    All most want is the ability for LR to import the videos (so we dont need 2 programs to do so), show a thumbnail (so we can see our videos mixed with our photos from the same shoot), and hand off the video to the OS or chosen player. All of which is already done by LR for other formats (and all of which is done for free by Windows 7 natively).
    That was my list of questions I asked you,
    "And anyway, what do you want to be able to do with AVCHD? edit? record? Store? Playback?"
    Is that not a fair question to ask you?
    I simply asked a couple of very pertinent questions, and I can read and write to any post I want to. I did not expect to get some kind of bullish  response.
    Message was edited by: hamish niven - additional commentary on more than 5 cameras supporting AVCHD

  • How to config a new remote on apple tv (first generation). I have lost my remote which came with the apple tv

    How to config a new remote on apple tv (first generation). I have lost my remote which came with the apple tv.

    Do you mean you've replaced your remote and it wont work because your AppleTV is paired to your lost remote?
    If so, http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1555 has you covered.

  • Does this support AVCHD files straight from the camera (Panasonic)??

    Does the new final cut pro X support AVCHD files from the camera?  I record with a Panasonic AG-HMC40.
    Thank you

    FCPX doesn't import AVCHD files from my Panasonic GH-2, even though importing works perfectly into iMovie.  So just because camera X imports natively into iMovie, it isn't certain it will import natively into FCPX.
    iMovie archives will always import because the AVCHD has already been converted to ProRes on import.
    In FCPX the AVCHD files from say a GH-2 can be edited natively if you don't want to re-render into ProRes, but to date I can't import them to test this.
    Chris.

  • Minolta DiMAGE A200 support broke with Camera Raw 2.1

    Hi,
    I am new to this forum, but I hope someone can help.
    Using Aperture since 1.5 with a couple of cameras I started with my Minolta DiMAGE A200. Unfortunately this camera was not supported by Aperture, but the identical A2.
    Of course there was a trick to bring A200 Raw support to Apple by editing Raw.plist . This worked perfectly (since the RAW files are identical for A200 and A2).
    With Camera Raw update 2.2 onwards this trick does not work anymore. The syntax and I also think the OS internal handling of Raw files did change. Worse, Mac OSX 10.5.6 seems to need Camera Raw >2.1 . So staying with the old Camera Raw package does not work.
    Of course I don´t want to blame Apple for breaking a hack, but since the beginning I never understood, why Apple does not support a identical camera model!
    Has anybody similar issues or a hint how to proceed? (without going to .dng)
    Best regards
    Joe

    Hi all,
    I contacted Konica Minolta tech support and they confirmed that the A200 is supported under Tiger (10.4) and should also work with iPhoto. Here's the email I received:
    "The camera will work on OS Tiger but we cannot comment on iPhoto as it is not one we have tested it on however we provide software called DiMAGE Viewer which will work with the camera. We have many customers using the camera with Tiger with no issues."
    I then found the following Mac OS compatibility info on Konica's tech support site:
    http://www.konicaminoltaphotoworld.com/kmsupport.com/Compatibility.3036.0.html?& L=0#).
    To summarise, Konica state that Mac OS 10.1 - 10.3 are fully supported and limited testing has shown that 10.4 works as well. There's no mention of iPhoto compatibility. The document also mentions possible file corruption for transfers over 10 mins and issues with date and time info not being transferred to the Mac. I thought these were a tad worrying so I sent a follow-up email to Konica tech support. Here's the reply I received:
    "It should work fine with Iphoto.The information regarding MAC OS X.
    There can be corruptions with transfers of over 10mins but not necessarily and therefore it is recommend to split transfers and also the data and time may not be transferred correctly and these I am afraid are issues which should be resolved when newer DiMAGE Software is released, however they might not occur at all and is only a precaution."
    So... it's all a bit vague. Seems like it will definitely work with OS 10.4 but you might get some of the problems mentioned above... and then again you might not! Also, in the above reply, Konica mention that these issues should be fixed in a new version of their DiMAGE software. So maybe these issues don't occur if you just use iPhoto? Who knows....
    I'm still trying to decide whether the A200 is the camera for me.
    Cheers,
    Stuart

  • Which camera will work best with the MAC? NIKON or Canon

    Contemplating on buy a camera and a MAC, but need to know which camera will work best with a MAC, Nikon or Canon? Any info is appreciated

    Both will work very well. You might not even need to install the software that comes with them because they'll probably work fine with iPhoto etc. Before you buy a camera, check this list of cameras supported by OS X:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3825
    Just about all Nikon and Canon cameras are on that list. If a camera is so new it is not yet on that list, it will be in the next update, probably.
    That list is for raw format compatibility. If your camera also shoots JPEG, it will work with a Mac even if it's not on that list. If a camera doesn't work by plugging in a cable, take the card out and put it in an ordinary USB card reader and the Mac will read it.
    Nikon has a slight advantage in that it supports a mode that lets the Mac mount a camera like a disk on the desktop. Canons don't mount on the desktop, but it's not really a disadvantage, because Canons still work great with Apple iPhoto, Apple Aperture, Apple Image Capture, and Adobe apps, and all of those are more efficient ways of transferring photos than dragging them out manually.

  • [latest macbook pro 15"] there are about 280 GB "other" on my storage, which came from no where. Any idea or suggestion of any fs manager? I am new with Mac OS X.

    [latest macbook pro 15"] there are about 280 GB "other" on my storage, which came from no where. Any idea or suggestion of any fs manager? I am new with Mac OS X, and usually using finder to organize my files. I really don't know where these 280GB "other" came from. this laptop is used for my study, so I haven't used it for downloading vedios or musics which could be extremely large. (what about steam online like youtube? is there any temp folder that need to be cleaned manually in os x?)

    Hello daz3
    The Other items could be items in the OS X folders such as the System folder and caches, personal information such as documents, contacts, calendar data, App Plugins or extensions, Media files that cannot be classified by Spotlight as a media file because they are located inside of a package, file types not recognized by Spotlight. Check out the article for more information.
    OS X: What is "other" space in About This Mac?
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6047
    Regards,
    -Norm G.

  • Lost genuine windows 8 which came with my Hp laptop but have recovery drive

    i lost my genuine version of windows 8.1 which came with laptop, but still i have recovery drive in my system. But i am not sure on how to use that recovery drive. When checked in google i found that i can restore using hp recovery manager from recovery partition but worst thing is i dont even have recovery manager in my system. Could you please help me in getting genuine version of OS from recovery drive. 

    You should just need to know your existing Apple ID and password.
    Look at this,
    "Using an existing Apple ID with the iTunes Store..."
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2589

  • How to install Windows 8.1 Enterprise on Ultrabook which came with basic Windows 8.1

    Hi,
    I guess I'm not the first one with this question but anyway...
    I've got 2000EUR expensive Ultrabook recently, and what's interesting it came with Windows 8.1. Just standard basic Windows 8.1, not Pro or Enterprise.
    Obviously I needed to upgrade it with larger SSD 1Tb and install Windows 8.1 Enterprise as I need Hyper-V and other Enterprise version functionality on day to day bases.
    I was surprised that I can't do so as SLIC is reverting Windows 8.1 back to basics!!!
    .. so my question is - How can I can Windows 8.1 Enterprise 64Bit on to very expensive Ultrabook which came with Windows 8.1?!?!
    Kind Regards,
    Kon

    Hi,
    Enterprise edition of Windows Client OS, is not available via OEM and not via Retail - it's only available via Volume Licensing agreement.
    you can purchase an upgrade to Pro, via the Microsoft Store:
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-au/windows-8/feature-packs
    Don
    (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

  • I have a G5 which I intend to keep.  Now that I have updated my iphone 4s to iOS 7.0.  I cannot add music to my iphone or upload photos to iphoto.  I have the last itunes 10.6.3. which was supported by apple.  itunes will not interact with my iphone on an

    I have a G5 which I intend to keep.
    Now that I have updated my iphone 4s to iOS 7.0.
    I cannot add music to my iphone or upload photos to iphoto.
    I have the last itunes 10.6.3. which was supported by apple.
    itunes will not interact with my iphone on any level.
    Apple made all the equipment I use.
    Bentley and Ferrari etc do not stop making parts for their cars?
    The least Apple could is.
    A. Update itunes to run on a G5
    Regarding iOS 7.0 you have totally lost the plot.
    We buy apple why?
    Quality.
    Intuitive interface.
    Stable software.
    Design.
    All that Steve Jobs consider sacrosanct.
    Quality is about ongoing support longevity of product.
    Its not about trying to sell to every person on the planet, others are way ahead of you.
    So try respective the customers you have, it wont be long before theirs a better operating system and your lead in hardware is marginal. 
    Regards
    Glyn Evans
    My post on facebook this morning.
    If you have an iPhone or iPad do not update to ISO 7 unless you want an operating system that looks like windows 8. The graphics looks like it was designed by a artistically challenged mongoose and the operating system is not intuitive something apple users expect. Overly complicated ugly and generally change for the sake of apples paranoia since the death of Steve Jobs.

    You need to update iTunes to 11.1 on your PC

  • 1. I have an iPod which has purchases synced with I tunes with an apple ID. I now have an iPad with a new ID for cloud. I have cloud storage capacity of 5gb which came with the iPad. How can I use one ID and store my existing music in cloud?

    1. I have an iPod which has purchases synced with I tunes with an apple ID. I now have an iPad with a new ID for cloud. I have cloud storage capacity of 5gb which came with the iPad. How can I use one ID and store my existing music in cloud?

    HI Frostyfrog
    CHeck out iTunes Match which has an annual fee of £21 or thereabouts. You can store a maximum of 25,000 songs there and they all become available on your other kit, iPhone, iPad and iPod. I know it works as I have over 23000 songs uploaded of which only a few we're bought through iTunes.
    it works by comparing your music to the whole iTunes music dadata base so you access the same tunes that you could get from iTunes. If you have obscure stuff, it uploads your own music to the cloud as a copy.
    I Find it incredible that on my iPhone with its 16gb memory I can view almost 200 gb of music (ie my 23000 songs) and play any of them. Anything I add to iTunes becomes available via the cloud fairly quickly from a few minutes or a little longer if adding a lot.
    The first time you use it it will take quite a while to match your music if you have a lot, but after that it is all automatic. Read the stuff on the apple site. Your PC needs to be at least running Vista. I recommend it and at less than 50p a week it's good value.
    Good luck

Maybe you are looking for