Which do you like better....Printer Pro or Print n Share Pro?

Which do you like better for your iPad...."Printer Pro" or "Print n Share Pro"?  I'm sort of agonizing over this.  They both look good, but maybe one has better support?  I will appreciate any opinions I can get.

from personal experience print n share pro is my choice
also depends what you want from the app? i use it on my ipad to email stuff and print it, as well as print from google chrome which i have installed and also some of my photos i print, as i like to make collages from them or use them for reference etc
its brilliant for email as i find the standard Mail so frustrating to use
from what i recall the developers are eurosmartz - i think they have a website so check them out, not sure can post links here
hope that this helps for a better informed choice

Similar Messages

  • Which framework you finds better?

    Hello,
    which framework you finds better?
    Struts Chale
    WebWork
    Spring
    JSF

    Spring is dandy and currently get Kudos on being the hype of the month.
    JSF apps can be designed almost entirely through visual development tools. Now THAT's handy. Plus I feel it will remain long after many of these others drift away. The best parts of Spring that JSF doesn't already utilize will probably get consumed into it eventually, much like Struts.
    Like angrycat mentioned, none of these are "easy" to learn. They will require an investment of time.

  • I have an iPhone 3GS and have updated to IOS 6.1.  Before with emails there was a user bar at the bottom which allowed you to move emails to folders, print etc, but it now seems to be removed. Can you help ?

    I have an iPhone 3GS and have updated to IOS 6.1.  Before with emails there was a user bar at the bottom which allowed you to move emails to folders, print etc, but it now seems to be removed. Can you help ?

    Close out of the mail app, double click the home button and completely close out of the mail app.
    Then do a reset, hold down the home/sleep button together until you see the apple logo and then release then wait for the phone to boot back up.
    then check your mail again.

  • A simple poll - Which features you like in CS4

    Iâm conducting a simple one question poll about illustrator CS4
    features. Would you mind visit the poll url.
    http://twtpoll.com/rp6k10
    Thank you...
    Jean-Claude

    Nice to see the poll and the results though I love multiple artboards I love the new appearance panel functions. excellent poll.

  • Licensing GUI components, which do you like?

    Can anyone recommend a library of components that're 100% jfc/swing and of high quality?
    Looking for dockable windows, sliding tabs, custom LNF etc
    preferable falling under the lgpl :) but fairly inexpensive licensing costs should be ok (300-500USD)
    ive been looking at JIDE, and Component Suite by Javio...they seem to be ok..any others? or a resource that has good reviews on components?
    or is componentsource.com the definitive one?
    Thanks

    http://www.swingall.com/
    JDock is a pure java swing framework for managing, moving and resizing inner windows or components using a layout manager like a BorderLayout or a GridBagLayout.
    Features :
    - Compatible with standard java layouts (BorderLayout, GridBagLayout...)
    - Resize, move inner windows or components
    - Maximize any inner windows
    - Use actions toolbar by inner window
    - Default actions for maximizing or extracting an inner window
    - Dynamic add/remove of actions
    - Shadow when moving / resizing an inner window
    - Save and restore the state of your environnement
    - Several samples for GridBagLayout and BorderLayout
    - UIManager for customizing the default colors
    - Hide / show any inner windows (depending on your layout for the result)
    - UI delegate for customizing inner components
    - Avoid the usage of splitpanes
    Best regards,
    A.Brillant

  • Which encoder do you like to use?

    Hi,
    I need to do some high quality encoding and would like to hear some opinions about which encoder you like to use.
    Compressor seems pretty good, but there must be some reason the competition is able to charge more for their offerings.
    BitVice?
    MegaPEG.X?
    Hueris MPEG Pro?
    What other options are there (besides dedicated hardware encoders) ?
    Many thanks.

    Hi Phillip - don't get me wrong, Compressor is just fine for a lot of encoding work, but when I go back to thinking about v1 it just wasn't reliable for encoding going to replication - there were far too many glitches and anomalies in the data it produced, notably fairly large bitrate spikes which caused the playback to falter. When you are needing to encode reliably and get things out of the door fast, this kind of issue is way too serious...
    On top of that the standard output of compressor was milky - fairly washed out look which needed you to tweak the gamma setting. Whilst easy enough to do, it was another set of mouse clicks.
    Finally, Compressor was not very good at CBR encoding - it varied too much from the bitrate for my liking.
    Some of these issues can be seen in BitVice - I occasionally do still get spikes in the encode, but it is very rare. The output from the default settings is very good, and with the digital noise reduction tool I can get a super smooth looking encode from most material. The reliability of this makes BitVice a very good option.
    Procoder is PC based, which introduces a new dimension. In most tests, the CPU on my PC will crunch numbers happily all day, and fast. The Mac is far better at a lot of things, but in raw grunt my PC is quicker (I need a new Mac, obviously!) This means I can use FCP to be creative, and pass the footage to the PC for encoding, leaving the Mac free to continue what I was doing. Procoder is also an excellent encoder and the output from it is rock steady and reliable, time after time. I happen to like the look of the finished MPEG, too - very clear and crisp and very seldom any glitches. If I set it to CBR encode, that's what I get. It seldom varies from the min and max I give it for VBR too, and there are plenty of post production filters to iron out glitches I miss at editing. It also does a pretty good standards conversion when I need it, certainly far superior to QT based tools I have thus far used (not including the Nattress filters). In short, it knocks spots off Compressor for the way I work.
    So, speed, convenience, reliability and quality of output - each of these are important and relying on Compressor only doesn't give me the options I like to have. Compressor 2 is a good enough encoder, but have a look on the compressor forum to see what the issues are! Then head over to Innobits.com and check out the BitVice forums... I have to say that Compressor 2 is a very different beast to v1, and much, much better than it's predecessor, IMO (although not without it's problems).
    The thing is, if you are happy with what you are seeing from your encoder and like the way it works then there's no need to change. If you want to have alternative options, or your work flow is a bit different, then perhaps Compressor alone isn't enough.
    Quite apart from the technical differences I did create a disc with encodes from different softwares and play it to some colleagues who don't do video work. I asked them to compare the image with the original footage and say which is closest, then to say which image was 'better' to look at. Every time Procoder came top, BitVice second and Compressor last. I guess I ought to repeat this very unscientific and largely unreliable method and include MegaPEG.X in it now, too. I was only hoping for a bit of a straw poll on what an 'average' consumer might think was a good picture, I wasn't looking at in-depth comparisons. It was, however, good to get a range of opinions from a pretty unbiased group and confirmed my own thoughts about the output from the encoders.

  • Podcast-which one do you like the best?

    Hello, i want to sometime downlaod a podcast...but i will like to know which one you like.
    -i like comedies, but no swearing, and unappropiate stuff for people under 8, i will like to let my couasins see it.
    -how much space does it take?
    -Will it cause problems?
    -is it ok if i downlaod it at my grandmas place, then at home i wont have a copy of the podcast?
    Thx
    Chris.

    -how much space does it take?
    depends on how long they are.
    -Will it cause problems?
    no, y would they make them if they cause probs?
    -is it ok if i downlaod it at my grandmas place, then
    at home i wont have a copy of the podcast?
    as long as its not on auto sync you should be fine.
    Nano 4GB black,Moto RAZR V3 black, PSP, all kinds of cases for nano,radio/remote   Windows XP   <img src="http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e13/superman5656/s.gif"align="right"</span>

  • I have some audio files on my previous phone which I would like to export to my new iPhone 5. I am told that you can only import files from iTunes. Is that true? If not, how do I import files from my phone - or my Macbook pro laptop-to my phone?  Thanks!

    I have some audio files on my previous phone which I would like to export to my new iPhone 5. I am told that you can only import files from iTunes. Is that true? If not, how do I import files from my phone - or my Macbook pro laptop-to my phone?  Thanks!

    iTunes will only import music from your phone that was purchased from the iTunes store.  To transfer music from other sources you have to use 3rd party software, such as PhoneView.

  • Can you print from the ADF with Officejet Pro 8600 (not plus) & how to print checks in correct order

    Client has Officejet Pro 8600 I(not plus) They want to print payroll checks out of QuickBooks but when they put the checks in tray 1, it pulls the check that is on the top, which happens to be the last check # in the stack.  Is there a way to print where the printer pulls from the bottom of the check stack as opposed to the top. I've looked and can't seem to find the answer. QuickBooks says we should check with HP and change something in the print drivers?
    So I thought it would fix it if they printed the checks from the ADF where I thought I could control if it pulls from the front or back of the stack. When we tried to print from the ADF, it pulled from Tray 1 and we weren't given the option to print from the ADF.   (only Tray 1 & 2...which they don't have the 2nd tray anyway) So does this model, not being the PLUS model, not allow you to print from the ADF. (only scan, copy and fax from the adf?)
    If we can't use the ADF for check printing, then how can we get the checks to print in the correct order.  Meaning, the 1st check # to print should be on the check that is on the bottom of that check stack in Tray 1.  Otherwise they have to count out the exact number of checks & place them in the tray.  Or reverse all of them which is not an efficient either! I hope this makes sense.

    Hi @kceacct ,
    I see that you would like to know how to print out the checks in order. I will do my best to help you.
    The ADF can be used for copying, scanning and faxing.
    From the print driver you can only select the tray that you want to print from.
    Changing Print Settings in Windows 8.
    You would have to load the checks in order from top to bottom in the paper tray, since the printer just pulls the paper in from the top of the stack of paper.
    Have a nice day!
    Thank You.
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    Gemini02
    I work on behalf of HP

  • I would like to use my HP officejet pro 8600 and HP officejet pro 8100 for printing envelopes

    I would like to use my HP officejet pro 8600 and HP officejet pro 8100 for printing envelopes.

    Hi there cv4928,
    Could you provide the community with a little more information to help narrow troubleshooting? What operating system are we using and what application will we be printing from?
    You can say thanks by clicking the Kudos Star in my post. If my post resolves your problem, please mark it as Accepted Solution so others can benefit too.

  • I have a USA DVD which I would like to play on my macbook pro. How can I do this without having to use up options to convert between regions which are limited

    I have a USA DVD which I would like to play on my macbook pro without using up the options to switch regions. Is there a way to do this?
    Also can it be done through a DVD player attachment to an Ipad?

    program called MDRP to rip it......  then use Wondershare to convert it, also Iskysoft video converter is an option.
    You dont have to put it ON the Ipad, once on the Mac, you can Stream it wifi to the Ipad using the $2 program called VLC STREAMER (not VLC, but streamer made by VLC),.... best APP for your Ipad to stream videos from your MAC to your Ipad.
    A direct DVD to MP4 converter : http://www.xilisoft.com/dvd-to-mp4-converter-mac.html

  • Hi, I'd like to put a black and white effect on my colour footage which will look really sharp but which also looks bright so the whites look bright and the blacks look very dark . Any tips of which best effects to use to achieve this look in Prem Pro. Th

    Hi, I'd like to put a black and white effect on my colour footage which will look really sharp but which also looks bright so the whites look bright and the blacks look very dark . Any tips of which best effects to use to achieve this look in Prem Pro. Thanks

    Under the Effects-Lumetri Looks-Desaturation choose a B and W effect. Then add the luma corrector from the Video effects-colour correction section. Adjust the brightness and contrast to get the effect you want.

  • Which is better for music production: macbook air or pro?

    Which is better for music production: macbook air or pro?

    The MacBook Pro has higher specifications, depending
    on the model, and then CTO additional upgrades.
    The Air does not have a Retina display, but has lesser
    specs, so that may make a difference. They still offer a
    low-end MB/Pro w/ optical drive, w/o Retina; specs vary;
    it may work in your instance. You'd have 14 days to take
    a new Apple computer back, so keep that in mind.
    Good luck!

  • Which Font Management Software Do You Like?

    Hi,
    I currently use Suitcase and am a little frustrated with it, mostly because I find it difficult to manage client fonts and your own font library and make sure that the correct font is activated. I dont' like the concept of the font vault.
    So, I'm shoppping around for other font management software. I'm curious to hear which ones you all think are best? I've heard great things about FontAgent Pro and Font Xplorer. Which do you recommend for a graphic designer needing to manage client's fonts and a very large font libarary (20,000+ fonts)?

    Look into the "Sets" feature of FontAgent Pro.  You can create Sets for each of your different (arbitrary) classifications.
    Command+click on the thumbnail to open full-size image in a separate window.

  • Tilting screen gives better colour matching with print why did I need spyder pro?

    OK, that was not a serious comment but there is truth here, and it should not be?
    Equipment:
    Imac 10.4.11
    Photoshop CS3
    Canon printer
    monitor callibrated with Spyder 3 Pro
    Colour management policy accurate in theory,
    Working space same as camera space same as embedded profiles from Raw.Adobe RGB1998,
    working in 16 bit, minor adjustments in raw, and CS3.
    paper used - Photo Paper Plus Glossy (PP101)
    Printer profile set to SP2 (same as semi gloss unfortunatley)
    Detailed setting used in apple print dialogue to highest which is 2 unfortunately, not 1.
    Screen is set to Soft proof before print for above paper.
    PROBLEM:
    1. Blues and Greens always less saturated than screen
    2. Prints generally slightly darker, This is problem with grays and shadows being darker than screen.
    3. Oranges less saturated
    4. Colours often, in general, are bland and lack the impact that I see even in the soft proof.
    QUESTION:
    What could be going wrong? I have used the channel mixer to compensate for colours, but this I was doing before i bought the spyder3 Pro. I should not have to do this. Does the printer convert on the fly a 16 bit data image to 8 bit, because I never convert before sending to the printer? In windows my printer shows the option to print using Adobe RGB 1998. But in my Mac I do not see this option, could it be that the printer is using s'RGB regardless of what CS3 sends to it?
    I have been struggling with these issues for a few weeks now and can find no solution. EXCEPT, that when i tilt my LCD monitor upwards I get better colour accuracy, the darker parts of images are more in line with the photo. YET, i have profiled the monitor at least 15 times over the past 2 weeks.
    I am Lost. Can anywhere help please?
    thankyou, Chris.

    Chris wrote:
    >But as with marketing campaigns and advertising policies, maybe it is time for the "Teachers and lecturers" in this industry to make this point more clearly.
    Yes, they certainly should emphasize how quality and the means to achieve it are also tied to better equipment. It's also necessary that the users become more competent, of course, but the quality of the materials and equipment is just as crucial in order to achieve quality results.
    >It is only something that I am beginning to realise. for me a monitor was a monitor. The way that colour management hardware manufacturers talk is therefore un-balanced.
    They do their bit, which also includes the necessary evils of hype and marketing. It's *our* job not to fall for the inflated claims and the manufactured enthusiasm -- to ask around, read the reviews and understand how to interpret the specs. NEVER buy ANYTHING just based on the say-so of the manufacturer!
    >The way that Pantone and makers of colour cards rant on about colour is also un-balanced. What they should be adding is ....with a proper monitor designed for photos these products will work??
    The matching of spot colors on a monitor display is a tricky business in itself. Of the 1100 or so colors in the Pantone Coated palette, about 140 are more than 3 DeltaE 2000 outside of the gamut of sRGB (using Relative Colorimetric) and about 185 are more than 2 DeltaE 2000 off. The peak color difference is at 13 DeltaE.
    But many of the monitors out there don't even cover sRGB, which is a relatively small color space. My Apple Studio Display has a gamut 15% *smaller* than sRGB, for example: more than 200 of the Pantone coated colors are 3 DeltaE 2000 or more outside its gamut (with a peak at 11.4 DeltaE), and 265 are off by 2 DeltaE or more.
    On the other hand, the newer higher-end displays from Eizo and NEC-Mitsubishi (and others too from Samsung and HP) cover gamuts that are far wider, enough to cover AdobeRGB or larger.
    Only 35 Pantone coated colors are outside AdobeRGB by 3 DeltaE 2000 or more, and 65 by 2 DeltaE 2000 or more (the highest color difference is a much more moderate 6.2 DeltaE).
    Not perfect, but a much better situation -- all due to using a better monitor (which, yes, is also more expensive).

Maybe you are looking for