Which forum for LenovoEMC / IOmega NAS units?

There seems to be three fora for these NAS devices.
On the index page, this one seems to be only for PX devices but that doesn't show up in the cookie crumbs which say "Lenovo Community > Network Desktop Storage > LenovoEMC Network Desktop Storage"
And some of the messages are clearly about the IX series.
Can we have clear guidlines for which forum to use and some nudging to see that they are followed? Perhaps the fora should be combined.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hello HughR
The forums are separated in the same way as in the support page, with the addition of moving rackmount devices to the enterprise forums.
-LenovoEMC: LenovoEMC Network Desktop Storage
current LenovoEMC px desktop units (lifeline v4.x.x)
-Lenovo: Lenovo Network Storage
Current Lenovo ix and ez media desktop units (lifeline v4.x.x)
-Iomega: Iomega Desktop Network Storage
Legacy ix class devices, pre-LifeLine os Storcenter, or other legacy Iomega network hard drive devices.
Iomega branded px devices technically could go here, however the LenovoEMC forums would be best suited. Same for any Iomega ix or ez media device, the Lenovo section would be better suited. ( more of a catch-all section) (lifeline v2.x-3.x)
The Enterprise product section has the following:
-LenovoEMC Rackmount: Lenovo EMC Rackmount Storage
Current LenovoEMC px rackmount devices (lifeline v4.x.x)
-Iomega Rackmount: Iomega Rackmount Storage
Legacy Iomega ix/px or other pre-LifeLine OS rackmount network storage devices. (lifeline v2.x-3.x)
Bottom line:
If you have a current PX device use the LenovoEMC destop/rackmount sections accordingly.
If you have a current IX or EZ Media device, you should use the Lenovo forum section.
If you have a legacy Iomega device the Iomega desktop/rackmount sections should be used
LenovoEMC Contact Information is region specific. Please select the correct link then access the Contact Us at the top right:
US and Canada: https://lenovo-na-en.custhelp.com/
Latin America and Mexico: https://lenovo-la-es.custhelp.com/
EU: https://lenovo-eu-en.custhelp.com/
India/Asia Pacific: https://lenovo-ap-en.custhelp.com/
http://support.lenovoemc.com/

Similar Messages

Which Forum for Wireless Mu

Hi,
I have a potential problem with my recently purchased Sound Blaster Wireless Music (which is cool but I'm not sure which forum to post the question in.
Please could someone point me in the right direction?
Cheers,
James

JamesHA,
Actually since it is a Soundblaster Wireless Music we have directed most users to the Soundblaster board for it. This is one of our "mixture" products where it could fit in a lot of places so it was wise to ask where to best ask. Soundblaster is the place.
Jeremy

Which forum for BCS?

Hi All,
Which forum is to be used for SEM-BCS discussions?
It's half Financials and half BW nowadays!

Hi,
See Marc's reply here:
SEM Topics like BCS and CPM -> Check SAP Community

Which Forum for "Repair Permissions" problems?

To which Forum do you submit "Repair Permissions" problems?

Thanks, Luke.
My permissions keep coming out as below. Doesn't seem right to me.
Steve
Repairing permissions for “Macintosh HD”
Reading permissions database.
Reading the permissions database can take several minutes.
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/PlugIns/DVD.frappliance/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/PlugIns/FRSettings.frappliance/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/PlugIns/FRSources.frappliance/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/PlugIns/Movies.frappliance/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/PlugIns/Music.frappliance/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/PlugIns/Photos.frappliance/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/PlugIns/Podcasts.frappliance/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app/Contents/PlugIns/TV.frappliance/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/BackRow.framework/Versions/A/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-rw-r-- , they are lrw-rw-r-- .
Permissions differ on "Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/Frameworks/InternetUtilities.bundle/Contents/ CodeResources", should be -rw-rw-r-- , they are lrw-rw-r-- .
Permissions differ on "Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/Resources/iTunesHelper.app/Contents/CodeResou rces", should be -rw-rw-r-- , they are lrw-rw-r-- .
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/Filesystems/AppleShare/afpLoad" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Install.framework/Versions/A/Resources/runner " has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "usr/bin/setregion" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/Printers/IOMs/LPRIOM.plugin/Contents/MacOS/LPRIOMHelper" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Permissions differ on "System/Library/CoreServices/RawCamera.bundle/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iLifeMediaBrowser.framework/Versions/A/CodeRe sources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/CodeResourc es", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/BlackAndWhiteEffect.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/CubeTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/DissolveTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/DropletTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/FadeThroughBlackTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/FlipTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/MosaicFlipTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/MosaicFlipTransitionSmall.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/PageFlipTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/PushTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/RevealTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/SepiaEffect.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/TwirlTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions differ on "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iPhotoAccess.framework/Versions/A/Resources/P lugins/WipeTransition.IAPlugin/Contents/CodeResources", should be -rw-r--r-- , they are lrw-r--r-- .
Permissions repair complete

Which forum for EM 10g Db Control questions?

It seems as if Enterprise Manager 10g is getting more popular. I see more and more threads in Database forums about the web-based OEM... while there is a dedicated EM category and forum (but forum name includes Grid Control).
Where should discussion or questions threads about Database Control be posted? Does Oracle have an idea about this?
Considering that Database Control is a single-database, cut-down version of Grid Control, should we try to focus the Enterprise Manager?
Database - General forum might be the logical place to post. After all, somebody new to Oracle "just" installs Database and problems with "web page"/EM is probably seen as problems with the database.
Both forums lacks a description (as seen on main forum page, Category pages or forum listing).
Could the use of the forums be made any clearer?

Hej Fredrik
I agree that we should have a dedicated section for all the EM questions in the Grid area of this forum in order to separate all the other grid requests.
you got my vote also on that post.

How to enable config torrent service IOMEGA NAS EZ Media & Backup Center LENOVOEMC

Here you are a tutorial how to enable stand alone torrent service on IOMEGA NAS EZ Media & Backup Center
How to enable config torrent service IOMEGA NAS EZ Media & Backup Center LENOVOEMC
any ask do not hesitate to contact to me. Thanks
Roger Biderbost

Great info again, Roger
serene
Community Advocate Program Manager
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

Make forums for moderators only available for moving for forums which Moderators understand

I see currently many questions moved by moderators to forums which are for 100% not related to the question.
Can this be avoided by giving moderators only rights to access forums from which they the topic understand.
It seems now they took the first one for which they have access rights to move, to get it out of their forums.
Success
Cor

Cor,
As far as I know, moderators can move to any forum.
I am not a moderator in a technical forum, so my experience may be different, but I tend to move to the "Where is the question for..." forum if I have no idea where a question belongs, and then let someone else suggest the right forum.
If I have an idea where the question belongs, I will still move to the "where is the forum" forum, and suggest the right forum.
If the OP requests, I will then move to the proper forum.
If someone else who has clear knowledge of the issue comes along and suggests a post be moved to a certain forum, I will do that as well.
I've done that on your suggestion before as well :)
I think that when you see issues of posts being moved to the wrong forum, and you believe it's done just to get the post pout of a forum, rather than to provide help, that you email a link to fissues, with your reasoning - it's the best way I know of
to get the forums owners involved.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book: Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C40686F746D61696C2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

Which forum i select for access the hardware through ports

please guide me in which forum i post the questions about javax.comm
to use the ports to control the hardware
thanks

Pick any one you like. Doesn't matter much anyway, nowadays we even have to answer JBuilder questions here.

Has anyone successfully used a "WD My Book for Mac" via NAS (plugged into USB port on router) as a Time Machine back-up drive?

Has anyone successfully used a "WD My Book for Mac" via NAS (plugged into USB port on router) as a Time Machine back-up drive? Apple support tech tried to tell me it wasn't possible and that the only NAS Time Machine could back up to is the Time Capsule, but I'm not buying it. I know it's doable, but I'm having a hard time figuring out which External HDDs will work and which ones won't. If not My Book for Mac, is there an External HDD that will work? (Running OS X 10.9.1 - Mavericks, btw...)

Given the nature of backups, my recommendation has always been to use a strategy that is unequivocally supported by Apple. As you already determined Apple Support unequivocally informed you that your proposal will not work, unless your router is an Apple AirPort Extreme or Time Capsule.
The exhaustive list of devices supported by Time Machine amounts to the following:
AirPort Time Capsule's built-in hard disk (any model)
External USB hard disk drive connected to a Time Capsule (any model)
External USB hard disk drive connected to an AirPort Extreme (current model only)
A hard disk drive directly connected to your Mac
That is all.
Use whatever backup device you want, but you should be aware that this site is full of reports of misery from hapless individuals who had been using NAS devices for Time Machine backups, only to find that they were incomplete, corrupted, or useless when they were required. Apple won't care if you lose your data while using a Time Machine configuration specifically excluded from their technical support documents.

A summary of this forum for perspective Nokia buye...

I have been on this forum for about 2 weeks (not long I admit) ever since the release of "free" navigation for (your) Nokia phone.
Since then I have observed the following:
Nokia blatantly refuse to acknowledge or comment on issues which make them look bad, to whit;
- Nokia maps not working with BlueTooth
- Nokia Maps failing to update on certain handsets
- A time/date bug causing phones to crash when using Nokia Maps
- Nokia voice files failing to install due to an LUA error
- Nokia's refusal to comment on whether certain phones will be supported
- Nokia's refusal to answer questions directly either on or off the record
- Numerous complaints by customers mislead by Nokia's blatant lie that Nokia Maps are now free for phone.
- Nokia's license servers failing to work when a license is purchased.
- Nokia's license servers rolling licenses forward to version 3, and then being unable to work with version 2 when any of the previously mentioned issues arise.
Nokia have further seen more than 40 users post to say they will never buy another Nokia (myself included) PURELY regarding the dishonesty they have shown with their handling of the maps situation. Nokia have still not commented, nor stated publicly their intentions with regards to these issues.
Nokia have, in short, angered their (once) loyal customer base and driven numerous people away for the opportunity to (falsly) advertise free navigation on their phones.
I feel the above is a fairly apt description of the occurences of this board over the last 2 weeks.
Does anyone else want to point out something I have missed/agree/disagree with me?
Please post your (reasoned and intelligently ONLY!) oppinions here, and lets see if we might be able to get through to Nokia.
Perspective buyers, watch this thread.
EDITED - I messed up the formatting rather badly.
If you read something you liked, or found this post useful, hit the green Kudos button on the left.

Err, if you post here, you really shouldnt expect Nokia to reply to you since this is aUSER-TO-USER FORUM. The Nokia hired moderators here arent even technicians who could answer some of the questions. They're just here to enforce forum rules. Some Nokia employees do come around from time to time, but that's so rare as to us not expect them here at any given time. If you want an official Nokia response to your queries, the only way would be to mail them through the contact us button at the top of the page.
As for shamelessly ignoring questions regarding n95 and n96, lets see. They announced that they were working on the maps to be compatible on other s60v3FP2 phones to be available this year, hopefully within the first half (n96 included). This has been already answered before. Then somebody comes in and posts the same question again. It is answered. A few days later someone else asks it again. Personally, some people here do get tired of answering the same question again and again sometimes at intervals of a few hours of each other. Most of the people here who answer your questions arent Nokia employees and are in no way obligated to answer your questions if they have already answered it like 5 or six times. I've seen here posts regarding the new answer key for the v40 5800 right next to each other asking the same thing, and one of the threads was answered.
If you find my post helpful please click the green star on the left under the avatar. Thanks.

Output type for non assigment Handling Unit

Hi All.
I would like to make a Output type for non assigned Handling Unit
Can anyone tell me about it?
Edited by: John Brown on Feb 9, 2010 10:53 AM

Make a new output type, transaction NACE, application V6 (Handling unit) and assign the output type to your output procedure.
Create a new output requirement, transaction VOFM and assign it to the output type in the output procedure. In the requirement check on KOMKBV6-VPOBJ. The value of KOMKBV6-VPOBJ shows to which object the handling unit is assigned: '00' or empty for not assigned, '01' for outbound delivery. See the domain VPOBJ for all possible values.
Reagards Jack

Question on which forum to use

I have a Jakarta POI (for createing XLS files) question. Anyone know which forum is best for asking this type of question?
Thanks

I figured I would ask before someone jumped down my
throat about posting a question in the wrong forum : )Well done, I sometimes quite unintentionally employ the tactic of hoisting by my own petard; it works well for me. :)
Anyway, my question relates to Jakarta POI, although
I am open to other solutions. I am using this API to
create XLS files. Now, I have been asked to find a
way to password protect the files as I create them.
It does not appear that this API has this
functionality. I'm pretty sure this is the case.
If so, does anyone know of a way to password
protect these files programmatically.I'm afraid that I can't help you there, but there is a dedicated POI forum here:
http://www.nabble.com/Jakarta-POI-f298.html

Forum for HR ABAP

Hi Experts,
I have been searching for a dedicated forum for HR ABAP but could not find any. Can any one help me on this?
If there is no forum, it would be great if a forum can be started for this.
Regards,
Swati

Adding my Vote to this...
Matt pls have your hand which is highly recognized
Regards
sas

Own Forum for Solution Manager

We are implementing the Change Request Manager part of the SAP Solution Manager, and are still navigating on the high seas.
So I had a look at the SDN if I can find some useful tips.
I found contributions in Web AS general, CRM, Netweaver Platform, Other SDN Questions, ...
Business Process Management (BPM) should be the right one, but it seems to be too generic for this complex and by its own nature difficult to isolate product.
So I suggest an own forum for the SAP Solution Manager, easy to be found by everybody, where all problems can be concentrated.
Thanks for your kind attention!

Hi Craig & Hi Mark,
Until the Solution Manager Forum is up and running, I have a small question that I'm hoping you can help me with. I am currently evaluating Solution Manager as more than just a "technical communication channel" between client and SAP.
I would define my work tasks as being functional, and see a wonderful opportunity to use SolMan as the name of the product advertises: a solution manager (integration of the roadmap, IMG, business blueprint, project management, monitoring, help-desk, etc.). Where I work, this would translate into integration of the functional and technical personnel.
I've heard from a previous presentation that the 3.1 version had certain issues. I was wondering if the ramp-up 4.0 of December would have "smoothed" out these issues.
I was reading in the forum all I could find on SolMan, and came across this thread which seems to indicate that SolMan is still primarily a "technical communication channel".
Re: ASAP roadmaps in Solution Manager 3.1
Can I get input for the 4.0 ramp-up?

Software and Firmware for an old AirPort unit

Where may I find Airport Software and Firmware for an old AirPort unit.
I have a 3.06 iMac Intel Core 2 Duo running OS 10.5.7
I am using an AirPort Extreme unit.
I have the old AirPort that is dome shaped unit stored.
iTunes does not show the Airport option in the lower right of the screen
The AirPort unit has an Orange Light and is connected to my audio amp.

John Mckee2 wrote:
Where may I find Airport Software and Firmware for an old AirPort unit.
I have a 3.06 iMac Intel Core 2 Duo running OS 10.5.7
I am using an AirPort Extreme unit.
I have the old AirPort that is dome shaped unit stored.
iTunes does not show the Airport option in the lower right of the screen
The AirPort unit has an Orange Light and is connected to my audio amp.
John, to answer your question I'd need to know if you're seeking firmware for your Express or your Extreme, and which model of each you have.
The correct firmware for an "older" Express is version 6.3. Use Airport Utility to install it.
If your "old AirPort" is a Graphite or Snow model, you need to use AirPort Admin Utility for Graphite and Snow 4.2.5
This KB article may be relevant: Mac OS X 10.5: Can't configure a supported Apple Wireless device using AirPort Admin Utility for Graphite and Snow

Which forum for LenovoEMC / IOmega NAS units?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for