Which has better WLAN reception: E51 or E61i

i was astonished with the great wlan reception auality of the E51 (compared to the weak n80ie w could not detect any wlan while same time e51 detected 3 networks!!!!?????)
and i wonder if the e61i have the same good wlan reception as e51 or better or worse??
i prefer the e61i to buy but i am afraid of its wlan reception quality being a dissapointment as my n80
i would be grateful if somebody help me

Most Nokia Wlan enabled phone uses the same WIFI(rcvr/trxtr) chips, it's the placement of its antenna & facia of the phone that hampers the transmission & reception!
Knowledge not shared is knowledge wasted!
If you find it helpfull, it's not hard to click the STAR..

Similar Messages

  • Which has better export quality. imovie 11' or adobe premiere?

    has anyone used both? which has better quality when you export it? I notice that imovie downgrades the quality when exporting by a LOT. It looks great inside imovie and looks terrible once exported!

    Hi
    I can only guess - (have no Premiere) but
    Depends on what will be the end result. DVD or publish on YouTube etc. or saved on an USB-Memory to be Played on PlayStation 3 and alike.
    If DVD - then most probably Adobe Premiere is better (if it can export interlaced video to iDVD) - iMovie'08 or 09 or 11 can not do this - they discard every second line resulting in a sever loss of quality.
    I use
    • iMovie HD6
    • FinalCut any version
    And they do deliver full quality over to iDVD
    If other end results - then it most probably doesn't matter.
    Yours Bengt W

  • Which has better sound - DVD or highest setting Quicktime?

    Hi (I hope this question did not go through twice) -- I will be engaging in performances where I'll be streaming video and sound from my laptop... my quesiton is - which is better DVD or highest quality Quicktime? - for sound and vid... and by what degree? -- thanks.

    I'll have to say for me it's a tie between my iPhone 3GS and 120 GB (6th gen) iPod Classic. The sound using the Apple in-ear headphones is awesome on those two models. I can't explain why, but that's my observation-there's a marked improvement with those two compared to Nano and older iPod Classic models.

  • Which has better opportunities Oracle DBA or Oracle Applications

    Hello,
    I am a fresh MCA candidate currently working in infosys as a Software Engineer. i would like to switch either to Oracle Apps or Oracle DBA. But I am unable to decide which will have better career opportunities.
    Regards,
    Amjad Khan

    >>
    As a fresher can I apply for ORacle Apps Jobs after completion of my OCP certification.
    >>
    Oracle Apps has new certification and if I am nost wrong, it is still in beta.
    >>
    Is Oracle DBA a higher level then Oracle Applications ?
    >>
    For me, as a CORE DBA, Oracle Apps doesn't excite me much because I can't play with Oracle Apps database as I do with the CORE database.
    There are other areas which should be considered as an Apps DBA.
    Jaffar

  • Which has better sound?

    Hi,
    So I have had the N96 from the very beginning and till now I have nothing to complain except the fact that I am still on FW 12!!! (my code is 0573802).  Some help would not hurt
    Now my real concern about this thread is that I am thinking of changing to an N97 due to the fact that I would like to have a touchscreen and also the qwery keyboard is a cool feature!! But I would like to know the N97 sound quality compared to the N96.  I need to have good sound quality.
    Anyhelp would be appreciated in all cases.
    Thank you.

    grschinon wrote:
    0573802 is the product code of a phone bought from the Carphone Warehouse.
    Contact CPW and ask them for written permission to install generic firmware onto your phone. With that written permission, visit your nearest Nokia Care Point, where they will do the necessary and you'll be able to walk out of there with V30 on your phone. You'll also be able to update sooner when Nokia release new firmware versions.
    What does this have to do with this thread?
    Mark my posts as helpful if anyone finds it! After all you will make us improve.
    Thanks for kudos if you give!

  • Which has better sound quality?  Classic, Nano or Touch?

    Perhaps the answer is "no one knows" but I was wondering if anyone had either any personally perceived differences or (ii) a resource they could reference that actually gave test results.
    Thanks

    I'll have to say for me it's a tie between my iPhone 3GS and 120 GB (6th gen) iPod Classic. The sound using the Apple in-ear headphones is awesome on those two models. I can't explain why, but that's my observation-there's a marked improvement with those two compared to Nano and older iPod Classic models.

  • H.264 vs. MPEG-4 video, which is better quality?

    Which is better quality? H.264 or MPEG-4? Is one more compressed than the other? I'm putting video on my iPod and also may want to output to television from the iPod, so I'd also like to know which is better for that as well in addition to which is better in general.

    H.264 is significantly more compressed than typical MPEG-4. MPEG-4 naturally would be better quality to the discerning eye, and is not as dependent on the speed of your processor and the strength of your GPU as H.264 is. I managed to get a 320 x 240 video of H.264 compressed to be 200 Megabytes for a 2.5 hour video. On a G5 iMac 1.8 Ghz the playback was fine. Trying the same video on a slower Mac there was significant amount of stuttering of the video itself. Experiment with some one minute shorts and measure the file size and see which has better quality on what you are playing it back on. If you can tell the difference, then go with the higher quality format. Certainly keep a higher quality format burnt to DVD in case you need to recreate from the original.

  • Which of these phones has better audio? Nokia 5530...

    The Nokia 5530 or the Samsung Galaxy Spica i5700?
    im aware this is a a Nokia site but im putting this up on the off chance that someone wil know both phones.
    i want whichever phone has better audio for xmas, so i need to deicde soon!
    help please?w

    You know it's foolish to ask such a subjective question.
    If you want to know which one has better audio. Go to a store and try them out.
    640K Should be enough for everybody
    El_Loco Nokia Video Blog

  • Which one has better AF system Canon 550D or Canon 1D mark II N

    Hi,
    I curently using canon 550D for bird photography and often misses the moments due to low FPS on Canon 550D.
    My friend suggested me to trade in Canon 550d for good Canon 1D mark II N which has good AF system and high FPS. Yes I may loose some pixels but is it really a worth to give a shot?
    Please suggest me.
    Thanks,
    Mohan

    Almost any newer camera than your T2i will do everything better including the 1D Mk IIn.  I still use mine on very limited occasions.  If you have EF-S lenses, none of them will work on a Mk IIn.
    Bob from Boston, aka The Snowman, hits on an important point. The Mk IIn is dated and not likely going to be computer friendly for you.  You will not be able to change any of the Personal Custom Settings for instance.  It does not have lithium batteries either.
    Have you considered the 1D Mk III ?  A much better and way more advanced camera and computer friendly.  If you are on the fence about a 1 series, the 1D Mk II (not the 'n' version) can be had in great shape for a couple hundred bucks.  Not a lot of money to see if it is for you or not.  That way you will know if a better and more expensive Mk III or even the fantastic Mk IV is in order.
    EOS 1Ds Mk III, EOS 1D Mk IV, EF 50mm f1.2 L, EF 24-70mm f2.8 L,
    EF 85mm f1.2 L II USM, EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS II,
    Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 EX APO, Photoshop CS6, ACR 9, Lightroom 6

  • Which has given you a better experience running XP. Parallels or VM Fusion?

    Which has given you a better experience running XP as a VM. Parallels or VM Fusion?
    Is one more secure than the other?

    bill66912 wrote:
     ...The Machine that I hvae ordered from Apple is an I7 2.9 GHz 13" MB Pro, wtih 8 Gb RAM (max).  Do you think it will have enough HP to run the Win OS and a VM from within that, using either Boot Camp or Parallels/Fusion? 
    And FM, I agree with you on Win 8; I have seen it, and while it's glitzy, I'm not a fan yet.  The ATM Industry is just migrating to Win 7, so I have no immediate need to support 8 yet, and will keep an eye out for one of those discounted "old fashioned" non touch-screen laptops
    The i7 should do the trick. The issue is not so much that a nested VM could work but that it would have direct access to the hardware CPU and give acceptable speed, and the i7 allows that. VMware has discussions of the process here http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-9150, and here http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-8970. The maximum VM RAM assignment allowed in Fusion 5 is 8 GB and your Mac needs its own RAM to function too, so 8 GB total may be a bit tight (you can hack the .vmx file to allow more RAM to be devoted to the VM if you have it and I give 12GB to Windows 7 and 8 VM's just to be safe). But if  all you're running when you're demoing the Win Server is Fusion, you can probably get by. You might raise your question directly on VMware's Fusion forum http://communities.vmware.com/community/vmtn/desktop/fusion?view=discussions&sta rt=0 and see what the experts say.
    Windows 8 is a surprisingly fast OS without the eye candy of Win 7 once you get past the Metro interface. That can be done easily with Classic Shell http://www.classicshell.net/, which bypasses the Metro start screen at boot, stays in the desktop, and brings back the Start button. And for what M$ is getting for a full Windows install these days, having it come in a PC instead of a box or download can be quite a saving.

  • Hello, i am interested in buying a 2010 Closeout imac 21.5 One model Is Z0JM5LL/a which has a intel i5 processor and the other is MC509LL/A which has a Intel i3 processor i figured the i5 would be better but specs say the i5 only has one processor

    Hi i am interesed in buying out a closeout model of a Imac 21.5 imac The 2 models are Z0JM5LL/A which has a Intel i5 processor and the other is MC509LL/A which has a Intel i3 processor I figured the i5 would be better has better specs but it says the i3 has a dual core Meaning 2 processors and the i5 only has a single Processor meaning i would think then teh i3 is better or is it false specs about the i5 do they both have dual Core Or which one is better Remember these are 2010 Models Not the New Quadcore Which Processor i am looking at is better????

    Both the I3 and I5 are dual core processors.  The I3 should be the 3.2Ghz model, which has an upgraded video circuit over the base model, which is good. The 21.5" I5 would have the same video circuit. It also has turbo boost, that the I3 doesn't have, which can boost it's speed from 3.6Ghz to 3.86Ghz when needed.
    If you need to compare the 2010 and 2011 models (or even 2010 only comparisons), here's some benchmarking: http://www.barefeats.com/imac11b.html , http://www.macworld.com/article/159631/2011/05/201127inimac31ghz.html , http://www.macworld.com/article/159765/2011/05/imac2011.html

  • In terms of performance which is better?

    Hi I have a query ...
    I have table t1 which has 1.5 million records .
    now ,
    which will be a better option ?
    Pls note I need to do it at run time from a procedure.
    create procedure p1
    is
    begin
    execute immediate 'create table tidup nologging parallel as select * from t1';
    end;
    Or having the structure and do inserts in append mode ?
    say ,
    create procedure p1
    is
    begin
    insert /*+append*/ into  tidup select * from t1;
    Commit;
    end;
    I knew that a DDL is far faster than a DML .
    Kindly let me know if I am correct or is inserting in append mode is faster ?
    Regards
    SHUBH

    Hi I have a query ...
    have table t1 which has 1.5 million records .
    now ,
    which will be a better option ?The one that runs the fastest, obviously.
    Pls note I need to do it at run time from a
    procedure.
    create procedure p1
    is
    begin
    execute immediate 'create table tidup
    nologging parallel as select * from t1';
    nd;Creating tables at runtime is a bad idea. If you need temporary tables, use Global Temporary Tables.
    Or having the structure and do inserts in append mode
    say ,
    create procedure p1
    is
    begin
    insert /*+append*/ into  tidup select * from
    t1;
    Commit;This would be better than the first option in terms of sensible coding.
    I knew that a DDL is far faster than a DML .Oh really? Kindly provide proof of this.
    Kindly let me know if I am correct or is inserting in
    append mode is faster ?Logically think about it.
    1 = Create Table and Insert Records
    2 = Insert Records
    Which do you think may take a smidgen longer to perform?

  • Which is better??????

    which is better?Dam really confused which speaker to buy??
    i currently have a creative m2600.but am not getting enough performance or that feel while watching movies like avatar,step up 3 etc......so am planning to buy a 5.1.......not planning but i have decided to buy a 5.1....so..
    which is better? the 6160 or 6060 or 6100.
    which of these will provide me relly great exprience while playing games and most importantly while whatching hd movies and while listening to music.......
    and other than this what i have to ask is...what is this "db" in speakers. i mean while looking at a speaker specs we can see it..like 65db,85db,75db..etc........
    and when i compared specs of the three speakers i mentioned above i saw that the 6160 has low "db"........why is that?

    The specs is just a guide, you won't be able to tell the slight difference in db using just your ears. Besides, it is just a comparison between the level of a music to the level of background noise, it does not necessary mean which speaker sounds better. If possible, please make a trip to your local electronics store and try out the speakers system yourself.

  • Which is better an android or apple

    Which is better getting an android smart phone or an Apple I Phone?

    As the poster Horses 547 said its a matter of personal preference. However I own and use both. Printing via air print is smooth and easy on an iphone. Printing on a android phone is iffy and tedious and you will have to find an app to print since there is no native app to do so. I purchased http://www.printhand.com which costs around $12 from the app store. but it is in my opinion the best printing app out there for android. I use it on my android tablet as well and its great. This company is the maker of the print app on iphones.
    The iphone is a little harder to put your own ringtone on the device. However very easy from the Itunes you put on your computer and hook into.
    Another thing an iphone does is if you use their cloud service or pay for a song it is available on all your ios devices. Iphone, ipad, or ipod or up to five computers registered through itunes on those computers.
    Google play music also can sync with all your android devices.
    Iphone don't have external Micro SD card slots, so the storage on the phone is all you have.
    Iphones use imessage which does not count against your text allotment  to another iphone or ipad user. it send regular text to non iphone users.
    Another thing is Face Time but I found a better program called oovoo at http://www.oovoo.com or in the Google Play Store for free.
    Iphones are paper thin but I have an android that has a larger view area and is also paper thin and light. Depending on the android phone it may have a removable battery, whereas iphones are sealed as are some new androids. I have found the sound for music better on my iphone, and videos are crystal clear. Again on some better androids the music and video is comparable .
    There is really not many differences but it up to the user.
    One last good thing is iphones are updated via Apple, no long waits for OS updates like is done with Android devices, and android devices on Verizon.

  • Which is better - Add a dimension or create more members in an existing

    Which is better - Add a dimension or create more members in an existing dimension?
    We are trying to figure out which can give us better performance in terms of calculations and retrieving reports - to add another dimension (entity/country) or add about 500-800 more members in an existing location/division dimension?
    Thank you!

    If you have BSO cube i would recommend to add in the same dimension where as ASO you can add members in a new dimension. Adding a new dimension is like creating a new cube you have to change each and every single calc scripts,report scripts,FR reports,Webforms and your rule files .... all the dependencies has to be changed manually . I think 500 members in the exsting BSO dimension will not impact the calc or retrieval times that much .

Maybe you are looking for