Which headset would you recommend to go with SoundBlaster Z

Hi,
I've bought SoundBlaster Z about a year ago, and i am looking for some nice headset to go with it for the best sound experience. I currently have Fatal1ty, which ceases to suffice.
There are either Tactic3D series, which have very tempting 3D sound feature, but there are also EVO series, which seem to be better for overall sound experience.
I intend to use the headset universally for anything from gaming to music listening, so i do not know which is better compromise.
I also heard Fatal1ty headset I currently own has limited 3D sound emulation, and I indeed hear hints of three dimensional sound when playing games, and it sounds indeed convincing. So I am not sure if EVO headset is capable of this too, or if it's just a placebo...

The Tactic3D shouldn't make much difference as you already have a Sound Blaster Z that can create the 3D effect (turn on SBX Surround, set your game to surround mode, set Windows to 5.1 speakers and set the SBX control panel to headphones). Any high quality headset will suffice.
I do not have experience with headsets (I use one UE900 in-ear), but people like those from Sennheiser. How much are you willing to expend?

Similar Messages

What bluetooth headset would you recommend ?

Hi,
I currently own a Jabra BT8040 but want to change it with one of the following Nokia headset:
BH-902
BH-602
BH-703
BH-803
However I don't really know which one to choose. For the last hours I've been reading a number of reviews on the web as well as some discussion on this Nokia forum.
It is my understanding that the BH-703 is the newest one in the above list.
Although I spend a lot of time on the phone, 8 hours of talk time is more than acceptable for me.
However I need a good sound because sometimes I'm calling from my car, and most of the time I have business calls in the office, where I have other colleagues also on the phone (open office), hence I do not want to be to much limited with a volume limitation on the headset.
I like the BH-902 because we don't need to take the phone to look at who is calling us, this is really great, however I don't know how confortable it is for confcalls running 1 hour.
The BH-602 has the highest autonomy however it seems to be the oldest one. I I don't need 11 hours of talk time.
From your experience, which one would you recommend for business usage ?
Thanks a lot in advance
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi,
I think my pick would the Nokia BH-902 headset. It has a nice set of features including - close-fitting control with the in-the-ear plug and optional ear hook - as stated on the product page.
But still the decision to be made is yours.
Hope this helps
Kind regards

Can I use ipad mini cellular abroad? If so which carrier would you recommend?

I want to buy Ipad mini cellular through the apple web store, but I can only buy locked with a carrier. Can I use it in other country? Which carrier would you recomend to use in China and Chile?

Lisa Ellies-Laye wrote:
Thanks. Hadn't heard of it. ? Is there any concern installing this free program on my Mac. Have you used it? Apart from being free is there any other advantage of Parallels and VMfusion. ?
Virtual Box is safe and well developed, it offers similar or identical features to the paid competition, it may be a little less polished but that's all.
Download and try it out, nothing to lose (except time).

XML = Swing GUI, which framework would you recommend?

Hi,
I'm looking for a framework that translates an XML description to a Swing GUI.
There're a lot available, e.g. gui4J, swixml, Thinlet, XUL, XULUX, Jelly, SwingML
Can you recommend one?
Are there any drawbacks I should be aware of from using such a framework? How about performance?
Many thanks

Hello,
The SwingAppKit is provided with the source :
http://www.swingappkit.com
It focuses on dialogs, preferences, XML application descriptor.
Best wishes,
A.Brillant

Given these criteria, which camcorder would you recommend?

As I research more, the more questions arise. Of the four kinds of camcorders *(High Definition, Standard Definition, Flash Memory, Standard Definition DVD, and Standard Definition mini DVD)*, *which kind is best suited for iMovie '09?* I realize that there is a link which shows which camcorders work with it, but my question is narrower. By this I mean:
I read that CMOS image sensors conflict with the Image Stabilization in iMovie '09. Therefore, I do not want a camcorder with a CMOS IMAGE SENSOR. It has to be the other kind.
A sideshoot question: If the camcorder lacks Image Stabilization, will that be taken care of in the iMovie '09 application? If so, then I don't need to look for IS as a requirement in a camcorder.
I read that there are ways that one can make a standard definition look like high definition on the YouTube video, so I think that High Definition is not that crucial. I saw a YouTube video shot with a camcorder that did not have High Definition, and it/the video, look very very sharp. It looked High Def without the downsides of High Def.
Because I want a small camcorder, I chose the Flash Memory Camcorders. I also love the idea of having separate memory cards for raw footage in each video.
I now have a Sony digital video camera recorder DCR-TRV 11, which uses cassettes, so I do not need to get another one of the same type. I want one that is smaller *that works seamlessly with iMovie '09* with no extra steps involved such as decompressing a compressed video. I read something that jolted me: It said that flash memory compresses the video and that one would have to de-compress that video. *IS THIS TRUE?*
Can anyone give me some thoughts and advice or wise counsel on this?
I am looking at the *Canon FS100,*
*Canon FS200,*
*Sony DCR-HC52*
Studying hard, but finding new questions around each corner.........
-L
Message was edited by: Lorna from Hawaii
Message was edited by: Lorna from Hawaii

/I guess, this will be a record-breaking Lorna-twitters-thread.. /
ok, from top-to-bottom:
• list of Apple-tested devices: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3290?viewlocale=en_US
(this list means 'tested'! usually, devices of same 'family' do work, as XS100/listed, XS110/XS130 not listed but supported too.
• DVD-corders = NoGo .. (please, Lorna, don't ask why .. you don't want it. period. )
• CMOS-probs are demonstrated and explained on my site: http://sites.google.com/site/karstenschluter/imovie09jellodemo
you will hardly get now-adays a non-CMOS consumer camcorder..
one simple (=in means of doesn't work everytime) workaround: set shutter-speed as short as possible.. IF device supports manual shutter speed...
• nothing replaces HiDef. period.
• .. but *HiDef ≠ HiDef* .. there are devices claiming 'FullHD', but using plastic-lenses, offering only digital-zoom, 'chip' is small as a pin-head, no native 1080-pixel res, PLUS low bitrates.
• compressing... bitrates define pic-quality. actual top-of-the-line: ~22Mbit/sec; 15-17 is fine; any under 10 is nonsense with FullHD ..
.. which uses cassettes, so I do not need to get another one of the same type.
so, why is the HC-52 on your list ?
all three devices on your list are SD - any reason for that?
imho, SD + flash-mem devices usually compress too much (=low bitrate)
what is your main delivery media? DVD? web? ... ?
a good source for tech. info is camcorderinfo.com
general 'Lorna advice':
there is no such thing as the perfect device.
make your own list of needs&want-haves; what about mic-in? what about battery charger? what about 'handling'/too big, too small? what about size of wallet? what about tripod, scuba-cases, wireless mics, lights...? ...
NO, Lorna, don't answer too me, answer yourself..

Which iMac would you recommend?

I'm a web developer by profession, and I've decided to add an iMac to my home office.
MY CURRENT RIG:
3.0Ghz i5
12gb ram
500gb HDD + 500gb (external)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB
Windows 7 Home (64-bit)
DELL 27" + DELL 22" Monitors (extended desktop setup)
I run multiple applications simulataneously such as Dreamweaver, Photoshop, Filezilla, and multiple browsers. Usually have music playing at the same time. My setup is great, and I have no complaints about its performance. I'm trying to determine what would be a comparable setup in an iMac. I suppose the easy thing to say would be find one with around 3.0Ghz and 12gb of ram, however I'm not sure if OSX requires as much hardware to offer the same performance? Can I get away with the 2.7Ghz i5 and 8gb of ram? Or would I be disappointed with that setup?
All suggestions greatly appreciated!

I've been asking this same question and can't find a good answer. Have you gotten any responses?
Thanks,
Lisa

Which Setup would you recommend?

Dear strangers,
Once again I must ask for your valuable knowledge! Let me start off by proposing the setups (both are almost equal in price):
- iMac 2012 (3.2 GHz i5 / 8GB RAM / 768GB SSD / GTX 675MX) (1)
- iMac 2012 (3.4 GHz i7 / 8GB RAM / 1TB HDD / GTX 680MX) (2)
I will not use the HDD of (2) as my main boot drive, I will use the LaCie Little Big Disk 1TB SSD instead. So I can eventually use the HDD as a backupdrive (internally, very paradoxal situation). My concerns:
- Will setup (2) cause any complications because I'm using an external drive as main drive (reliability, performance, ...)?
- For the same price, I get much better specs, mainly due the overpriced Apple SSD. But I'll use the PC (personal computer, indeed) for my studies, which means designerprograms like Inventor (engineering), but offcourse also for iTunes, browsing, a lot at the same time. So I wonder if the i7/680MX is really needed.
I hope you guys could help me, I didn't found a particular problem on other fori!
Thanks in advance,
Arno Claes
Belgium

Yes, Thunderbolt indeed. The speed is also quite astounding: 635MB/s read speeds with the LaCie, and probably around 350MB/s with the SSD (because of the fact that the LaCie can be configured in RAID 0 with 2 512GB SSDs). But it's mainly the reliability that troubles me, you see, 'it's not designed that way'.

Which iPad would you recommend for a college student, an iPad mini or full size iPad?

I already have the top of the line Macbook Pro 15 in ret display for school, but I'm also interested in using an iPad for school as well. Would the iPad mini be more convenient because of the small size or more of a problem? And would getting an iPad for school be really worth it? What could I do on there that I couldn't do on my Mac? If I were to get an iPad I would be looking into a 32GB, is that too big or too small? Thanks for the help ahead of time!

OK... here's the latest on my lab environment/server set up. We have a 17" iMac G5. It is connected to a 24 port 10/100 switch with two gigabit ports. The iMac gets a gigabit port; the eleven eMacs get 10/100 ports. There is an internal 160 GB SATA hard drive installed in the iMac, and a 160 GB external firewire drive connected to the iMac for back-up purposes. I haven't got the back-up software running yet, but plans are to back up user information on the external hard drive and create an archive of server OS set up and software on DVD in case of catastrophic failure.
Since our 30+ Windows boxes are served with your basic Dell Optiplex running Windows Server 2003 and an old, cranky Gateway running Linux, I didn't think our little Mac lab would suffer that much under an iMac server. So far it's been smooth sailing, and the whole set-up, iMac, server software, and external hard drive, were under $2000.

Recreate AVCHD archive? Which program would you recommend?

Free is best!

ClipWrap does not recreate AVCHD camera archives for isolated MTS files; it is useless for that purpose. It can however do two useful things. First, it can rewrap the h264 video clip from inside the MTS file into an m4v container that can be imported to FCPX (unlike the MTS file). This rewrapping doesn't alter the h264 stream in any way. Alternatively it can transcode the clip from h264 to ProRes, a step that is essential if the MTS contains 1080p60 material. Recreating an AVCHD folder structure is something it can't do.

Which Case Do you Recommend?

I purchased a Black Nano for my husband for Christmas. I would like to order him a case soon to have for Christmas. I have looked at the Agent 18 Case. Which one would you recommend? I know that there is a certain way that you put on this case. Also, does it take away from the black? Please give me your recommendations for a case. Thanks

Hi,
I'd have to say that I'd recommend the iSkin Duo Nano case without a second thought. I have one for my iRiver H140 as well and its never been out of it since installed. Same with the nano.
They are beautifully made, have 2 layers of protection, come in some cool colours and have screen/click wheel protectors.
Its changed the way I use my nano. Before I was always a little nervous about putting it in a bag or pocket. Now I don't worry.
There a belt clip for jogging and all 'holes' are covered when not in use. The only access is to the hold switch.
The only issue, as with all cases, is that if you have an iPod dock then it will no longer fit.
If silicone is your weapon of choice then look no further.
Hope this is of use.
NIALL 8-)

Would you recommend IOS or VXWorks for AP1200?

Hi All,
I am in the process of updating my AP1200 from ver. 12.01T1. I will be using LEAP and vlans. Would you recommend I stick with VXWorks or should I move to the latests version of IOS?
Thanks,

I am still having problems with per user vlans on the 1220 IOS version of the AP.
All my Vxwork AP's work fine. I loaded the latests IOS that is supposed to fix this problem, however it doesn't seem to do it for me. I am using IAS as the radius server.
I can see the Private-group-ID being sent to the AP, but it never moves the laptop to the correct VLAN. I am not sure if it is related to having to set the policy in IAS to "Virtual" instead of "Wireless" because of the different way the IOS version sends the NAS-Port-Type.
So I am stuck with an IOS version AP that doesn't work like my Vxworks AP's....Luckily it is a spare and not one I had installed anywhere...
It could be I have something configured wrong, but I have configured many Vxworks AP's...without any problems...
Don Hickey

I need to buy a camcorder -- upgrading from a Flip. Which would you recommend as easiest to use with iMovie 11? Which for Final Cut Pro? Thanks!

I need to buy a camcorder -- upgrading from a Flip. Which would you recommend as easiest to use with iMovie 11? Which for Final Cut Pro? Thanks!

You can't run iMovie 11 on a PPC G5 running the old OS 10.3 Panther - which is what you say you have.
iMovie 11 - cameras supported:
http://help.apple.com/imovie/cameras/en/index.html?lang=en_US
iMovie 9 - cameras supported:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3290?viewlocale=en_US
iMovie 8 Camcorders supported:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1014
Digital camera RAW formats supported by OS X Lion:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4757?viewlocale=en_US
Digital camera RAW formats supported by OS X Snow Leopard:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3825?viewlocale=en_US

Which of these solutions would you recommend?

while trying to create a login system using JSP, I ran into several tutorials, and tried creating one by using java beans to keep track of the session.
The bean stores the username by using setUserID(String userID), and also sets a certain variable to true if the user is logged in.
To create different levels or types of users, and add more functionality to this login system, I believe I could add more properties to determine the level and other necessary information (with information taken from a database), and simply use a beanid.getProperty() to check for the information I need for example.
I know that another way and the more common way to create a login system while securing other pages on the website, is to use session tracking and the session variable to set different values, etc... and keep track of the user.
Now my question is, which one of these 2 solutions would you recommend? Which one do you believe to be more secure?
Thanks.

Arent both essentially the same? In the first, you set all properties in a single bean object and bind that object to the session. In the second, you bind each property individually to the session. So there is nothing to choose 'security' wise between the two options. Security, I believe, has nothing to do with how you track the user's session. Usage of SSL for example is a security technique.
Having said that, if we confine your question to which is a better option for session management per se, I would favour the first (a single bean). I am not a great fan of a bloated session object though. You can always query necessary info from the db using this id rather than storing it in the session.
Note you neednt set a variable to indicate that the user has logged in. The presence of the UserBean is sufficient to indicate the logged in status (assuming that you create such a bean only on successful login).
Hope this is useful to you.
ram.

Question: Do I need to run and anti virus program with MAC OSX Lion? Have heard different opinions! If so what would you recommend? Was looking at Sophos. Does anyone have any experience with this? Thanks

Question: Do I need to run and anti virus program with MAC OSX Lion? Have heard different opinions! If so what would you recommend? Was looking at Sophos. Does anyone have any experience with this? Thanks

Do I need to run and anti virus program with MAC OSX Lion? Have heard different opinions!
You will continue to hear different opinions here, where thoughts range everywhere between "anti-virus software is the evil spawn of Satan" to "anyone not running anti-virus software is a fool."
Truth is, this is still a very personal decision on a Mac. Depending on circumstances, it is still very easily possible to stay safe without using anti-virus software, but circumstances and personal preferences vary widely. Besides which, anti-virus software cannot even remotely provide you a guarantee of protection!
To learn how to stay safe (with or without anti-virus software), and how to decide whether to use anti-virus software, see my Mac Malware Guide.

Which email service would you recommend and why? Google's or BC's?

Which email service would you recommend and why? Google's or BC's?

Easy Answer. Google. Hands down Google is better. BC has had issues in the past and while I think the issue is a little bit better I would choose Google. Do remember that Google Apps is $50 (USD) per year per user.
I have used Google Apps since they were still offering 50 free users and has worked great ever since. If there have been downtimes I have not noticed or has been so slight that is hasn't effected me in anyway. This is not the case with BC.
I am not trying to knock BC mail but it isn't the best.

Which headset would you recommend to go with SoundBlaster Z

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for