Which IDOC segments need to be filled for message type CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M

Hi ,
I am working on data migration to CRM7.0 system.I am using LSMW for creating ISU Contracts using CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M message type and CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M01 IDOC kindly help me in what all segments needs to be filled for creating ISU contract in CRM system.
Kindly share if there are any documents related to data migration into CRM system for IS - Utilities.I need to migrate  u201CBusiness Partnersu201D, u201DISU Contract Accountsu201D, u201DConnection Objectsu201D, u201DPODu201D & u201CContractsu201D  to CRM 7.0 .
Also I need to migrate Customer Interaction Records, Business Activities, Service requests and other information such as u201CProspectsu201D, u201CMarketing Attributesu201D to CRM 7.0.
Kindly help me in this as I am not able to find any thing from web.
Regards,
Suresh.

Hello,
I'm not sure you're taking the best approch.
Usually when you need to migrate ISU contracts into an ISU-CRM integrated system, you first migrate everything you need in ISU through the VERY powerful migration workbench available (transaction code EMIGALL), and then you replicate your data to CRM via INITIAL download.
That's definitely the strategy that will give you the best performance, and less work.
Kind regards,
Nicolas Busson.

Similar Messages

  • Create a partner profile for message type - 'CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M'

    Hi
    I am trying to create IDOC generateion through LSMW.
    i AM GETTING THE MESSAGEcreate a partner profile for message type - 'CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M'
    How do I create this profile??????

    Hi,
    Execute transaction BD64.
    Identify you distribution Model,
    Select the leaf node, and from menu select
    Environment->Generate Partner Profile
    Here in you specify 'Output mode' and 'Processing Mode'.
    Click on Execute.
    Check if any error occurs (Marked with Red color).
    Try creating the IDOCs
    Best Regards,
    Pratik Patel
    Reward with points if it is of any help to you!

  • In ALE/IDOC Change Pointer using Maintenance order for message Type

    Hi All Expert,
    I am using Maintenace order to send via ALE/IDOC(Change ponters), i need standard message Name for Maintenance Order,

    Hello,
    I'm not sure you're taking the best approch.
    Usually when you need to migrate ISU contracts into an ISU-CRM integrated system, you first migrate everything you need in ISU through the VERY powerful migration workbench available (transaction code EMIGALL), and then you replicate your data to CRM via INITIAL download.
    That's definitely the strategy that will give you the best performance, and less work.
    Kind regards,
    Nicolas Busson.

  • Custom segment does not exist for message type Debmas_cfs

    Hi,
    I have created a custom segment YEXTRA for basic type DEBMAS06.
    I have done the configuration in We82 and We20.
    I have implemented the segment in User Exit "EXIT_SAPLVV01_001". Now when I am executing the TCODE BD12  then it is creating the Idoc with custom segment. But when I apply the filter on sales org in BD64 then it starts giving me error that " Segment Y**** does not exist for message type DEBMAS_CFS.
    Kindly suggest if I need to do some other configuration also.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    SAurabh

    Hi Gearge,
    To add custom segments, you should create an extension.
    the TCODE is we30.
    Refer this link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/dc/6b7d6243d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Which ports need to be open for messages and facetime to work properly?

    I noticed that Messages no longer works since upgrading to Yosemite on my work network. But it did when i was in Mavericks. Did they change something in Messages in the upgrade that would cause it to no longer work? ports?
    I'm behind my work firewall, which ports need to be open for messages to work properly?

    Just make sure your 9001 port is open.
    Hope this works..
    Hamid

  • 1 request Idocs created for message type MATMAS

    Hi Experts
    I have done necessary config.
    I have attempted BD10 and BD11.
    I have got message that "1 request Idocs created for message type MATMAS"
    But iam unable to find the material in target system.
    Please suggest what need to be done.
    regards
    ramSiva

    Marias,
    And in PI, after having changed the password (why not), have you unlock this user account ? in SU01 of PI, you have a lock button.
    if you did it, and changed also the password, as explained, you have perhaps another (or several) program like a RFC destination which uses another password, and so after some exchanges... with a bad/old password, you have your message "too many...", and then the user is again locked...
    If you change the password in PI, you should change it in all application which uses this user. I hope you have not the same user from ECC to PI, than from a third-party to PI...
    that's why: the use of such technical users have to be referenced in a doc. By this way, if password has to modifiy, we know where we have to update it (mainly in different RFC destination).
    Mickael
    Edited by: Mickael Huchet on Dec 5, 2011 5:33 PM

  • LSMW: ALE/IDOC, getting the Create a partner profile for message type

    Hi Gurus,
    In my current project, i need to upload the employee data using the ALE/IDOC method with the LSMW
    when i'm generating the idoc in the 13th step, its posing the information message stating that:
    Create a partner profile for message type 'ZEMP_MSG'
    In partner profile i already assigned the message type .
    How to solve this issue, <inappropriate urgency removed by moderator>
    Thnks&regards,
    sree
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on May 13, 2011 9:55 AM

    This forum's aim is not only to search for information and ask the members questions, but also to share knowledge. When you have asked a question and found a solution, do share with the rest.

  • Enhanced Fields in IDoc Message Type CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M

    Dear Experts,
    I have enhanced the Business Transaction with EEWB and is used in Complaint Handling scneario. Now, I need to send the IDoc for the complaints. So, I have used the Message Type CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M for this. But this message type does not have the Custom Fields which were enhanced. When  I searched on the internet, I found the solutions to Re-generate the IDoc after adding fields in CRMXIF_CUSTOMER_H Segment. But when I try  to do that it is asking  for Access Key. I think there must be another way.
    Please guide me.
    Regards,
    Sreenivas Raju.

    Hey Sreenivas,
    Standard provided Idoc will not have segments for Z fields that you add using AET/EEWB. How did you try to regenerate Idoc? You need to use transaction BDFG to generate a custom Idoc.
    Follow the steps below.
    1. Create a Z function group.
    2. Run BDFG. Enter 'CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE' in parameter for function Module and press enter. It will list the available message types including 'CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M'
    3. Press Create button in application toolbar. A popup will come. Give a name for new message type. Another popup will come, give names for inbound/outbound functions using the Z FG you created, suitable development class and press enter.
    4. Now view your message type. Go to the idoc type and release it.
    5. Finally selecting your new Z message type, go to menu Edit->Idoc Type and Segment Type->Release. Release your objects. There may be a few popups, respond accordingly.
    6. Maintain partner profile settings. Process code will be APLI or APLM as per your need.
    Voila!! You have your new message type having segments for Z fields.
    Let me know the outcome.

  • Message no. B1003""Could not determine recipients for message type ACPJMM""

    Hi  All,
    While posting GR in MIGO, an error is showing. I am attaching the error description.
    ""Could not determine recipients for message type ACPJMM""
    Message no. B1003
    Diagnosis
    An IDoc of message type ACPJMM was passed to the ALE layer, but the three receiver fields in the header record were not filled. In this case the ALE layer tries to determine the receivers from the entries in the distribution model. There are no entries available in the distribution model for the above message type.
    Procedure
    Define the receivers in your distribution model for this message type or deactivate distribution for these message types.
    Yesterday it was not coming and GR was getting posted.. I was doing configurations for CIN and day before yesterday everything was done,all the registers were getting updated. For that I did many customisation in SPRO. I did settings in tax ion goods monement. and in Material master to assign screen sequence for foreign trade data screen. Is any customozation triggerring IDoc? Earlier also this came, that time we got client copy, but the problem is recurring. Its very urgent as we are going to transport SPRO settings to production.
    Solutions will be rewarded.
    regards
    B Shar
    Edited by: Ian Wong on Jul 4, 2008 4:48 PM

    Hi
    If you are not working with ALE & this message comes, then somone has mistakenly activated ALE linkages for IDoc Output in Accounting.
    if you want to keep this active & go forward, you need to complete the Distribution model customizng in BD64.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Inbound problem for message type WPUUMS

    Dear all,
    I want to receive the IDOC data for message type WPUUMS from a java server. Currently i am working on sample values for segments
    E1WPU01
    E1WPU02
    E1WPU03
    E1WPU04
    E1WPU05
    E1WXX01
    I am facing problems in passing the correct values .
    Its throwing a error message status 51.(Application document not posted) IDoc not fully processed.
    can you help me with some dummy data for all the fields in the above segments.
    reply ASAP
    regards
    arun

    You have to analyze where exactly the problem is.
    There are several reasons why the Idoc did not post:
    1) The Data you are sending to post document may be wrong. You may have to validate against valid data in Database.
    2) Thre may be some mandatory data which you are not passing through IDoc (Idoc data may be missing).
    It is not possible to answer a generic question like this with perfect answer.
    Best way is to debug and find out why exactly the problem is, if you know the error message (you may see it in Status record of this IDoc).

  • Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model

    Hi all ,
    please help me to solve this issue .
    i done with ale settings .
    orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
    when i create po it is giving error in output  "Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model"
    how can i rectify this error.
    Thanks

    > orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
    do both of them carter diffrent needs or is it the same idoc which is being sent to diffrent systems?
    if yes, then use a single model view with noth receiver systems defined in it.
    if not, i would suggest, copying the standard idoc and create a zidoc and then use different ones for diffrent receivers....
    or u can use diff versions of the orders message type...
    say orders05 for one.... receiver and orders02 for another one....
    hope this helps!!
    Cheers!!
    Sidharth

  • Too many recipients found for message type in the ALE model

    Hello Friends,
                            Please help me in solving this error. I have a Outbound sales order confirmation ORDRSP  .
    In the distribution model i have defined the sender receiver and message type clearly...
    But  in va01  after creating sales order  extras ->Output->Hearder --->Edit
    Output type-- BA00
    medium --ALE
    Dispatch time : Send Immediately
    I am getting a error -
    Too many recipients found for message type ORDRSP in the ALE model
    Message no. B1130
    Diagnosis
    In the ALE distribution customer model several recipient systems for IDOCs with message type ORDRSP and filter object type 'KUNNR' with value '100' have been modeled from this system, but only one recipient system is allowed.
    Procedure
    Please change the ALE distribution customer model so that it allows only one recipient system for the message from this system.
    Please help me in solving this error.
    Regards,
    jeevan

    Hi Jeevan,
    In BD64, the said problem occurs, since the message type ORDRSP will be configured to different Logical System.
    Since you are creating sales orders & Output type, system doesnt knows, to which Logical system, it has to be sent since the Message type exists more than once.
    select Your respective Logical System where the Outbound Sales Order Confirmation ORDRSP has been created.
    Under the node ORDRSP, add the filter group for Customer.
    Double click the Filter group and add the respective Customer No.s to whom the Order confirmation needs to be sent.
    Then create Sales Order Confirmation & Output type. Data will be passed(IDoc) to the respective Customer(where the customer no.) exist in the filter.
    Hope it solves your Issues.
    Regards,
    Anbalagan.

  • ALE for message type BATMAS

    Hello
    I am trying to generate IDocs for a copy of the message type BATMAS and have added some custom fields to this new custom message type..
    1. I have created BD52 entries for this new custom message . But starngely the IDoc created is for message type BATMAS instead of the new custom message type in WE02. I am executing BD21 for the new custom message type . I have checked BD64 and partner profile settings for the new custom msg type. I have activated change pointers for this new message type in BD50 and BD61.
    2. I added a new field MCHA LVORM to the fields in BD52 . But the IDoc is not genearted whenever we change deletion indicator(IDoc).. Its creating the IDocs for changing all the other already existing fields.
    I'd appreciate any suggestions/help.
    Thanks
    V

    Hi Ravi;
    Just so I understand you, an IDOC was successfully created in ECC and sent to an outbound system.  Your outbound system, in this case is PI, which is acting as middleware for your ALE.  Now you have an error in PI and you can't get it sent to EREC.
    I know people don't like getting questions answered with other questions, but why are you using PI in this scenario?  Every ALE scenario I've utilized uses HRMD_ABA directly from ECC to the target system (not with a middleware piece included).  In WE20, what would be the harm in changing your receiver port to your actual EREC system?  Do you have some kind of business logic being executed in PI converting IDOC field values?
    If you think you must use PI, then in sxmb_moni, it would be interesting to know the error message for the IDOC there.  However, I think it's entirely likely you don't need to use PI at all and could just use a direct RFC between ECC and EREC.
    Good luck,
    Chris

  • USER EXIT for Message Type PCROLL

    Hello Gurus ,
    My requirement is that i need to convert few fields for Message Type PCROLL (Basic type GLDCMT01)  before sending it to other system by ALE . Can somebody help me out which user exit should be used .
    Many thanks for your help in advance .
    Regards,
    NK

    For future reference in case anyone is trying to do this, we were not able to find a suitable user exit to enhance BENEFIT3 IDoc, so we put in an OSS note and received the following response:
    "...currently there is no user exit/Badi in SAP Benefits Administration
    to enhance IDoc BENEFIT3. Such functionality is indeed missing in the
    system, which means that you will need to submit a development
    request to enhance the system in this respect in a future release."
    Anke

  • Error in ALE service 29 Could not determine recipients for message type MAT

    Hi Experts,
    While transferring the material using ALE am getting  error 29 ie   'Error in ALE service'  and message is 'Could not determine recipients for message type MATFET'.
    Also i ve recieved the materials with the proper status al the end am getting the above error.
    Kindly help me out.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi ,
    Status 29 means " partner profile not found " . Please check if the recieving partner is configured properly  in WE20 in sender system.
    Also make sure that the Port and RFC definations are also completed. If the IDoc is manually triggered then please make sure that control record parameters of the idoc are properly filled - if we miss the details ( like wrong port given , wrong basic type for message type - or extended message type ) then also the idoc will fail in status 29 even though the partner profile is properly configured .
    Since your idoc is getting generated i think no issues with BD64 since already interested recipeints were populated in control record of idoc.
    Regards
    Vikas Chaudhary

Maybe you are looking for

  • What is error message "required codec is not installed"

    I installed my Adobe Primier Software on my new computer and when I try to open projects from my old computer I get an error message "This file not supported or the required codec is not loaded"

  • Web application with RAD tool inside for dynamic JSP building

    I would realize a J2EE Web application based on JSP,Struts and eventually Spring for transaction management and iBatis for data access in my opinion very complex. The application presents search, list and detail pages, and the information visibility

  • Cursor and black screen on XFree86 server with DirectFb backend

    Hi all. I need to bring up lightweight XFree86 server with DirectFB as video backend on CE Linux (Intel Set Top Box). For now I've done following: 1.    Compiled and tested DirectFB with multi application support (fusion library). 2.    Compiled XFre

  • Boot camp, MAC pro and windows XP

    Hi, I am leading a programmers team, what we want is the faster machines to improve performance. Currently investigating an HP machine with windows XP 64 on it. But that doesn't work for us as most of hour programming tools do not work under XP 64. W

  • BDC and Performance Issue

    When performing a Call Transaction, is it better to use a synchronous or asynchronous update mode for a large number of records?  Right now, we have a BDC that is running on synchronous update but is taking forever to update. Sometimes it even causes