Which is better, AMD or Intel?

Hello everybody,
I still a newbie about parts of computer. I heard alot about Amd is better for gaming but not for Intel Pentium 4.
Can any 1 tell mi exactly what is the different between the two of them and also the advantage and benefit of using each of them.
Cause I be getting a new desktop on this sat,but still unsure of which to get.
Thanks everyone.
 :P

It really doesn't matter if you choose and AMD or an Intel CPU because it is the graphics card that does all the heavy duty number crunching and graphics rendering to create the lovely eye candy in games that turn us on.  In the small minority of games that do rely heavily on the processing power of the CPU, again, brand doesn't really matter.  Go for an AMD Anthon 2400+ or faster, or, a Pentium 4 2.4Ghz or faster, and be happy.
For the graphics card, choose one either based on the ATI Radeon 9700 chipset or better, or, an nVidia Ti 4600 based
card or better.  Avoid the nVidia FX 5800 like the plague unless you want perforated ear drums.  If you can stand the wait, the FX 5900 based cards will be appearing late this month/early next, and they are bound to be exceptionally drool worthy.
AMD CPUs had the edge over Intel CPUs in their ability to do floating point operations.  3D perpective games require an immense amount of floating point computation, but these days the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) on the graphics card takes over the burden and does a far far better job.
Intel's latest CPUs have caught up with AMD in floating point processing speed.  Intel CPUs were more affected than AMD CPUs by relatively slow computer memory related technology.   The less time a CPU has to wait to read or write data to or from computer memory the better it will perform.  Since the introduction the intel's 875p (Canterwood) and 865p (Springdale) motherboard chipsets, and with their ability to interleave two banks 400Mhz memory (PC3200 memory) to provide the *effect* of 800MHz memory, I suspect the memory bandwidth bottleneck has altogether disappeared.
AMD CPUs plug into socket A motherboards, and Intel Pentium 4s plug into socket 478 motherboards.
Both manufacturers make really great CPUs. If you get an AMD CPU, buy a motherboard with an nVidia nForce2 chipset for it.  For an Intel CPU I recommend an 865p (Springdale) based moatherboard, or an 875p one if you want the very best of what Intel has to offer and you are no hindered by either lack of money or tight-arseness.
Sir Honky.

Similar Messages

  • Which is better for gaming intel hd graphics 3000 or nvidia geforce

    i want to sue steam and i sonder which is better for gaming :Intel HD Graphics 3000 384 MB graphics or nvidia geforce . If you know a better graphics card please let me know thanx.

    sorry i had lots of typos

  • AMD vs Core I7 - which performs better for Adobe Products?

    I'm currently running an AMD System (Phenom 2 x4 3.2Ghz, 8GB DDR3 PC10666, ATI 3870 512MB, Windows Ultimate 64bit, WD 120GB 10k RPM)
    and I'm wondering if it's worth purchasing and building a new, intel Core i7-920 system. I know the higher end, 970 would be better, but I don't feel like dropping $1k on a processor - so 920 is what I'm looking at.
    I would like to know (from users who have used, or are familiar with both platforms) which system performs better with the Adobe production suite and if it's worth the investment to switch from AMD to Intel. Does Hyper Threading affect the way AE / Premiere render? Will I notice a difference in speed from 8GB to 12/24GB for memory (for AE / Pr)?
    I would also like any suggestions on graphics cards (FireGL vs Quadro or GTX vs Radeon) to boost performance. I'm not much of a gamer and I would like to concentrate more of power on production. Right now I'm using a gaming card (an older one at that) and I would like to know if buying a newer one will boost performance for AE / Pr.
    Any help, tips, or suggestions would be great!
    Thanks,
    Drew

    I would recommend Intel processors over AMD for Adobe products.
    Does Hyper Threading affect the way AE / Premiere render?
    I can't talk for Premiere. For AE, it's perhaps marginal compared to the number of physical cores. And could be in some cases counter-productive if it tricks AE's multiprocessing system into believing there are twice as many cores, because of the way AE assigns RAM to the rendering instances it launches for each core (when "Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously" is enabled in Preferences).
    Will I notice a difference in speed from 8GB to 12/24GB for memory (for AE / Pr)?
    Yes, 8 GB is actually the absolute minimum you want for a quad core system (2 GB per core).
    After that, it depends on the content. For HD sized Comps, large source files and/or 32 bpc processing, having more RAM would lead to better performance and reliability.
    I would also like any suggestions on graphics cards (FireGL vs Quadro
    or GTX vs Radeon) to boost performance. I'm not much of a gamer and I
    would like to concentrate more of power on production.
    In AE, OpenGL previews are meant to provide a smoother/more responsive experience when interacting with the application. It won't help with render times in most cases. A medium to high end consumer level card should be fine. No need to sell the house for one of the pro level models. Keep an eye to the list of officially supported card/driver combinations.

  • Requirements: Which is better ?

    Hi. I'm about to buy a laptop and I am wondering which of these is better.
    Photoshop will be used only for high res high dpi drawing(no photo editting) on an external monitor.
    Will there be any difference in performance between GeForce 540M and 525M, both with 1GB DDR3?
    Will there be any difference in performance between Intel Core i7-2630QM (2.00/2.90GHz 6 MB Cache) and Intel Core i5-2410M (2.3/2.9GHz, 3MB Cache)? Will Photoshop take advantage of the four cores with lower frequency or two cores with higher frequency is better?
    Which is better to invest in - GPU or CPU, considering the fact that the laptop will be used with external monitor for drawing(no photo editting) ?

    If you were going to go with a desktop I would refere you to this article of mine:
    http://robertoblake.com/blog/2011/07/building-a-photoshop-cs5-computer/
    I'm working on a laptop equivalent for this. CS5 can do without the Quad Core processors if you go dual core at 3.0GHz or better. I found an Acer laptop for $449 with 4GB DDR3 AMD Phenom II Dual Core N660 3.0GHz, 320 GB 5400RPM, DVD Super Multi, ATI Raedeon HD 4250 (OpenGL), L2 Cache is 2MB
    and its upgradable to upto 8GB. 
    If you're skeptical I've worked on the go on a rig a little less powerful than this and I've been able to do 27x41 Movie Posters without a problem! You can't beat that price for the power.

  • [SOLVED] So, which is better; VDPAU or VAAPI?

    Hey all,
    I'm trying to get a grasp on what VDPAU and VAAPI actually mean. Before, on my old laptop which had an AMD card I really didn't care much because all I could use was VAAPI anyway. Now that my new laptop (Intel graphics) supports both, I'm wondering which is better? Perhaps "better" is not the right word, but you get what I mean I hope.
    I tried reading some on Google, but I'm not getting much wiser. All I know now is that VDPAU is NVIDIA's equivalent to Intel's VAAPI and that if your program/driver supports VAAPI, it supports a subset of VDPAU?
    I know that in order to use VDPAU, I have to use libvdpau-va-gl which seems to be some sort of wrapper/hackish solution? In that case, wouldn't it be better to just use VAAPI which is natively supported by Intel's driver?
    As you see, I'm not getting much of this and I hope you can enlighten me!
    Last edited by Unia (2013-10-30 17:38:42)

    donniezazen wrote:VAAPI is the native protocol for Intel graphic cards and VDPAU is for Nvidia.
    Incorrect. They are both, as I said, APIs. Any driver can implement either of them. Intel implements VAAPI, but the open source radeon and nouveau drivers implement VDPAU. The proprietary Nvidia driver implements VDPAU too.
    But there's nothing (except developer interest) preventing Intel from implementing VDPAU, or radeon/nouveau from implementing VAAPI. It's a developer choice, nothing more.
    donniezazen wrote:VAAPI requires libva-intel-driver and libva-vdpau-driver for Intel and Nvidia respectively.
    Not quite. libva-intel-driver is indeed for Intel. But libva-vdpau-driver is a wrapper - when VLC used to be VAAPI only, libva-vdpau-driver allowed you to get hardware acceleration in it with the Nvidia proprietary driver. Nowadays VLC supports both VAAPI and VDPAU, so libva-vdpau-driver isn't needed anymore.
    donniezazen wrote:VDPAU requires libvdpau-va-gl/libva-intel-driver and nvidia-utils for Intel and Nvidia respectively.
    Again, not quite. libvdpau-va-gl is a wrapper, required only if you want to use Intel with applications that support VDPAU only, like flash or mplayer. VLC and mpv support VAAPI, so libvdpau-va-gl isn't needed with them.
    donniezazen wrote:I am wondering if I should install all those packages and set VLC to automatic and let it appropriately choose. I have Optimus laptop but 90% time I use Intel card.
    All you need for Intel with VLC is libva-intel-driver, nothing else. You can also install libvdpau-va-gl to use Intel with flash.
    I'd keep the Nvidia card deactivated for video decoding, no sense using extra power when Intel can do it. The only advantage Nvidia has is advanced deinterlacing.

  • Which Is Better For High School, An Air or A Pro?

    Which Is Better?

    SSD drives are superior in many ways and would give the air another +1 of course you can always upgrade.
    if size and budget are of no issue,  MacBook Pro Retina 15" would be invaluable to anyone student or not
    I am using this macbook air:
    1.8GHz Intel Dual-Core Core i5, Turbo Boost up to 2.8GHz
    4GB 1600MHz DDR3L SDRAM
    128GB Flash Storage
    and this macbook pro for my comparison:
    2.5GHz Dual-core Intel Core i5, Turbo Boost up to 3.1GHz
    4GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM — 2x2GB
    500GB Serial ATA Drive @ 5400 rpm
    SuperDrive 8x (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)

  • Which is Better? Mac or PC?

    Which is Better?
    Intel iMac   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    Hello,
    I'm not going to argue that a Mac is better, but I do have a response to:
    looking computers and the software is great however
    they have major compatibility issues. for example
    many websites do not support mac's Ex.
    www.aircanada.com
    I have never had any problem exchanging documents or viewing web pages with the Mac.
    All my document exchanges have worked flawlessly, and work going both to and from Windows PC's.
    But, you need to make sure you are using the right program on the Mac if you want to share files with PC users.
    As for the website compatibility, the site you provided as an example will work just fine. They just don't want you to know it.
    What that website is doing, is running a check to see what web-browser you are using. Beyond that, they are also running a check to see which computer you are using.
    So, what you need to do is make sure that your browser tells their website what it wants to hear.
    So, in Safari, you can use the "Debug" menu to have Safari report itself as the Windows version of Internet Explorer.
    Go to the Debug menu, then pick "User Agent", then choose: "Windows MSIE 6.0".
    If the site still won't load, then go to the site first, and perform the selection again from the Debug menu.
    Basically, what you are doing is changing what Safari identifies itself as.
    Additionally, the website that you listed does list that it is compatible with Mac OS 9.0 or later. So, it should work provided you pass it's checks.
    If for some reason it still won't work, contact them since they say that it is compatible with the Mac.
    The only sites that absolutely will not work with a Mac are sites that use "Active X" to take over control of your computer or communicate directly with the operating system. Fortunately, those sites are getting rarer and rarer.
    The only site I've run across in recent times that uses Active X is Microsoft's Windows Update site (which you wouldn't need with a Mac anyway).
    As for enabling the "Debug" menu in Safari, if it is not already there, you can do that by:
    Closing Safari
    Open "Terminal" which is located at:
    Hard Drive --> Applications --> Utilities --> Terminal
    Then type the following at the command line:
    defaults write com.apple.Safari IncludeDebugMenu 1
    If you would prefer an automated method of enabling the Debug menu, you can always download the free Safari Enhancer program which includes a setting for this feature:
    http://www.lordofthecows.com/softwarelist.php

  • Which is better for gaming and why?

    Hi,
    I was researching budget gaming laptops(around $1000, INR 55000) and came up with two choices.....
    1)HP Pavilion g6z-1d00 Notebook PC
    http://shopping2.hp.com/en_US/home-office/-/products/Laptops/HP-Pavilion/A2B39AV?HP-Pavilion-g6z-1d0...
    2)HP Envy 14-2130nr Notebook PC
    http://shopping2.hp.com/en_US/home-office/-/products/Laptops/HP-ENVY/QE295UA?HP-ENVY-14-2130nr-Noteb...
    Could anybody please tell me which is better for gaming (main purpose and best performance)?
    The HP Envy looks great but I don't know much about AMD Quad Core.....
    Also, is it possible to upgrade the graphics card on the HP Envy ( AMD Radeon 6630 to a better one) via a HP centre?
    It seems to run most games quite well, but I need it to be able to play new games for at least 4 years more (college), while not factoring in the costs for any possible graphics card upgrade....
    Please help!!

    Thanks Huffer _ very useful.
     I wasn't aware that there was a heat problem with the i7 processors, my dv8 runs at around 42 to 52 degrees, mind you I don't really put it under much load. I use it to play Blu-ray ISO files on my projector and for photo editing (Adobe CS4), it's an 820QM.
     I have also changed the thermal compound to ICDiamond and drilled holes in the speaker cover to improve air flow, that made a difference too.
     @ abhishekmaha
     Don't take my comment to seriously, although I think it has some truth to it, it was meant to poke a bit of fun at you. 
     Heat has always been one of the biggest factors when it comes to any computer, designers try to make them thinner, lighter and cheaper and those types don't work for gaming very well. They're OK for the occasional one, but not on a regular basis. I believe that if you game on any machine that was not meant for it, you will not get 4 years out of it _ 2 years.
     I wish I could tell you different, but I am not going to lie to you.
     Heat basically affects 3 things on a laptop, the solder that holds the components on the motherboard, any mechanical moving parts, eg the hard drive, fan _ and the battery. You can remove the battery to prolong its life when gaming.
     Heat breaks down the solder over time and the mother board simply stops working as far as the hard drive, it stops spinning because the tiny bearing(s) in there dry out and seize up.
     If you don't want to use a cooling mat then prop up the back of the laptop, hanging it over the edge of the table will expose the fan intake, but will block off other vents.
     60 degrees is a bit warm too, 50 is better or rather, the cooler the better. What ever machine you get, make a note of what the temps are when you first boot up and when it's hot. The idea is to get an average so you can judge when it is dangerously getting hot.
     P.S. Be sure and give Huffer a kudos too.

  • Which is better graphic for iMac 2007 or MacBook Air 2012

    iMac use ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro 256 MB and MacBook Air use intel graphic 5000m so which is better?

    Without knowing how you intend to use the computer it's impossible to say, also you are comparing apples and oranges.

  • Advice Needed... which is better?

    Hello...  I am not a computer 'genius", but not a complete "computer idiot' either.  I have a question, and then I will give my reasoning, because maybe it matters in the decision.
    Which is better, a PC (Gateway) with 6GB Ram, i5 processor, 1.5TB HD  or an Imac 4GB Ram, i3 processor, 1TB HD??
    Basically, I have had a Dell 2GB Ram desktop for 7 years, which suited me fine. I ran CS3 on it with no problems.  I recently had a virus, and had to swipe my computer, and when I re-installed Adobe, my Premiere Pro will no longer allow me to edit properly (audio plays fine, while video lags and skips around during viewing).  I know it is time to get a new computer either way, and a few friends have told me that I really shouldnt be running Premiere Pro on 2GB of ram, and suggested at least 6GB.
    I found a Gateway for $650 on bestbuy site with the above specs... but then someone I know, told me I would be better with an Imac with the specs above.  Is that possible that a 4GB mac would run better than the 6GB PC?
    also..  will CS3 work on the Windows 7 PC, but if I get Mac system I will be using CS5.
    I use Photoshop, and Premier Pro for simple music video editing (5-6min videos).  I do not do anything major..but want to at least be able to view what I am doing.
    thanks

    While I don't agree that Macs are as inferior as some here claim, for your purposes an i5 iMac is certainly inadequate. The i7 quad core iMac is something else again; it can take up to 16GB of RAM, which is plenty for most applications. The particular i7 CPU in the iMac is also quite capable with a number of performance enhancing technologies on board. The big problem with the iMac, though, is that it comes with only one internal HDD; there is an added SSD option, but in my opinion it's still too expensive. For video you should have at least two internal drives and preferable three or four, as others here have said. External drives are generally slower, even if you use a FireWire 800 port. Sometime this year Apple may add a Thunderbolt port to the iMac, as they have to the MacBook Pro. This will be a game changer for external media, with unheard of flexibility in connectivity and the performance of Fiber Chanel at an affordable price. There are already external RAIDs coming to market with Thunderbolt connections. However, there is no date certain for such an iMac refresh.
    For even semi-serious video you need some heavy iron, whether Mac or PC. There are some great Mac Pros available now with up to 12 cores on two 6 core Intel Westmere processors; however, even though I am a Mac fan, I'm sure you can build or get a BTO Windows PC with comparable specs for less. I suggest a minimum of four modern CPU cores to handle multi-threading and multi-tasking chores. At least two fast internal hard drives, four is preferable. And, of course, the more RAM the better, though this too will raise the price. You may not get the maximum RAM right away; the important thing is that the motherboard be able to support substantial RAM upgrades so that you can grow into it.
    The challenge, even with PCs, is that a number of core technologies are changing right now. SixGb/s hard drives are becoming available but it would take a high-end and relatively new motherboard to support them properly. So, besides the question of which computer to get, you have to consider when to get it. If you need it right now, that narrows your choices somewhat because you cannot wait for these new technologies to come on line.
    The most important thing to consider, though, is not to cheap out. Presumably you will be doing some real work on it, so think of this computer as an investment in your own future. Buy the most computer you can afford and a little bit more. Oh, and there is a new Version of Final Cut Pro coming out soon that will be Intel only and 64 bit capable, so Apple is moving ahead on this front, too. Remember, not all of Adobe's CS apps are 64 bit yet either. It's just one more technology in transition.
    One point I will concede, however, is that Windows has better video drivers than OS X. Even on a Mac, running Windows in Boot Camp delivers better video frame rates than the Mac versions of the same apps running in OS X. So, for reasons of cost and better video support, a Windows PC is probably the way to go. PCs also have it over Macs in the number of options available. If you are not a techie yourself, I agree as well that it is probably a good idea to have someone who is built it custom for you. Of course, with a custom PC you won't get the kind of warrantee that comes from Dell or Apple, but the person who builds it for you will probably be able to service it as well.
    Ultimately, of course, your budget is likely to govern the kind of PC you get more than your preferred specs. But even with Windows PCs you get what you pay for. A cheap PC is just that, a cheap PC. Inexpensive PCs are affordable because they use inferior components. Keep that in mind.

  • Refurb 13inch 2012 OR Refurb 15inch 2011 which is better?Is refurb really worth it?THOUGHTS ON REFURBISHED MBP

    hey folks i am planing to buy a macbook pro after saving cash since the past 6years i want you all to help me with which product i should go for
    i am 17 and need a good laptop which will last me another 5years..... i have been thinking about a refurb macbook pro 2012 13inch 2.9 i7dual core which is for about 1260 and another one refurb macbook pro 2011 15inch 2.2  i7 quad core which is again for 1350.....i would want to know which is a better option as price wise both are very close and if is the 15inch worth it and better as the 2011 does not have the usb3.0 and bluetooth 4.0 and its sandy bridge but again its quad core where as the 13inch 2012 has all the stuff but its dual core.... what is the difference between quad and dual core?....and i would want to know your thoughts on the refurb models as i said its importamt for me to spend my money wisely since i have been saving for the past 6years....does the refurb mbp as good as new?can they have cosmetic damages?is the outter shell and body replaced?and do they come with new parts and accesories? and is it like a second hand laptop which is used for a year or few months and then returnded and sold again as refurb? please let me know which is better and long lasting or else shall i go for a new one...cause if i buy a refurb mbp and the apple protection care plan the total cost is as much as a new mbp so is it better to buy a new mbp and not buy the apple protection  plan? PLEASE HELP ME OUT
    Thanks for your time
    Toodles
    Links of the models:
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/FD318LL/A/refurbished-macbook-pro-22ghz-quad-c ore-intel-i7#overview
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/FD102LL/A/refurbished-macbook-pro-29ghz-dual-c ore-intel-i7
    ps: is a 128gb solid state drive worth replacing the 500gb or 750gb serial ata

    USB 3 vs USB 2 -> the importance of USB 3 depends on how much you use an external drive to read/write large files or large numbers of files. I once did extensive testing with USB 2 vs FireWire 400 & 800 with TimeMachine. It was no surprise that performing a complete backup with FireWire was significantly faster than with USB (or even a large backup such as after installing an OS update). But for those hourly (or even daily) backups the difference wasn't all that significant. Exporting a large number of photos or an iMovie to FireWire was significantly faster. Copying a copy word processor files it was almost impossible to accurate time the difference. For some the USB3 ports are a big deal. For me, not at all because I'm heavily invested in FireWire drives.
    BlueTooth 4? Frankly, I can't say because the only thing I use BT for is my keyboard and mouse which the older standard is fine for. There are potential advantages - just as with USB3 - the question is whether your current/future needs align to the new standards. Again for me they don't.
    As for the CPU difference - I've already indicated that unless you are doing high processor intensive work (such as 3D modelling or big statistical modeling) either processor has plenty of power. According to the benchmarks my new work iMac runs rings around my work 2009 Core 2 Duo 13" MBP. In my real world use of those two computers I never notice the difference. If I played 3D games on them I would.
    I've already said that all but one of my refurbs looked new and from what I've seen of relatives and friends buying refurbs that runs pretty true. You aren't buying a new computer but on the other hand I've never seen a refurb that looked beat up. Most refurbs are computers that buyers returned within Apple's 14 day buyer's remorse period or were dead on arrival, a new one given to the buyer, and repaired.
    I can't tell you how long a refurb MBP will last - no more than I can tell you how long a new MBP will last. But Apple warrants them for a year and lets you buy an extended warranty just as if they were new. That indicates the confidence Apple has in its refurbs.
    Where do you get the idea that you can only put a 128GB SSD in a 13"? It can handle any standard 2.5" drive and there are plenty of SSDs in that form factor at 256GB and above. Yes an SSD is expensive compared to a standard drive but the speed increase is amazing and not just in booting up the computer. Installing an SSD on my 4.5 year old iMac gave it another year of live. Installing one in my work MBP was like getting a new computer. I wouldn't consider buying a new computer without one.

  • Quicktime Pro VS Sorenson Squeeze which is better for uploading to YouTube?

    I'm thinking of buying Quicktime Pro or Sorenson Squeeze - which is better for uploading to YouTube? Which would give my video better quality?
    Also, with regard to Sorenson Squeeze: The website says these are its requirements - could someone explain what each of them means in logical terms?
    Mac OS X system requires:
    Power PC with G5 processor or greater or Intel processor - (I'll be using this program with a MacBook Pro - will this work?)
    Mac OS X 10.4 or later - (Again, will this work with a MacBook Pro?)
    512 MB of RAM
    QuickTime 7.2 or later
    DirectX 9.0b or later (What is this and how will I get it? Is it free?)
    * Mac users must have the Flip4Mac plugin from Telestream (Is this plugin free?) ** Windows only feature * Plugin sold separately
    Please be as specific as possible.
    Thank you so much in advance for answering my questions! It is really helpful!

    First.
    You have no control over the conversion to Flash video (done during the YouTube upload) if you use QuickTime .mov format.
    Second.
    YouTube does allow H.264 Video for its "high quality" display so you would want a QuickTime .mov container.
    Now you are even more confused than when you started.
    Flip4Mac allows export from QuickTime (and apps like iMovie that use it) to Windows Media Player (.wmv) formats. They will also be converted to Flash Video by YouTube so you gain nothing by using it.
    You don't need Squeeze, QuickTime Pro or the Flip4Mac upgrades. Just use iMovie 7 (part of iLife '08).

  • Is nVidia GForce GT620/630 better then embedded Intel HD4600 ?

    Hi,
    I just bought refurbished m83 SFF, that came w/ intel HD4600. I wonder if I should upgrade to Gforce GT730? I foouind low power 25W GT620 (no fan) on NewEgg for ~$50.
    I do intermnet browsing, occasional picture editing, etc. The m83 is a SFF w/ 4Gb or RAM, 500 HDD, and i5 .
    I think I got an "upgrade" bug...
    Thanx
    T540p
    Win 7, i7 4GB x 2, GT 730M
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Intel has been greatly improving the performance of it's built-in graphics. The HD 4600 has a passmark score of 646, which is better than a GT 620 (score of 434), and close to the score of a GT 630 (734.)
    http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/mid_range_gpus.html
    A good rule of thumb, to see a difference (when using graphics demanding applications, ie. gaming, photoshop, etc.) , you need to double the existing score.   Internet browsing, other than watching HD video, is not demanding.  
    It doesn't sound like you'll see much benefit from a graphics upgrade. Instead, depending on how many apps and/or browser tabs you have open at a time, a RAM upgrade to 8GB (must be same size and speed/timing as existing memory to optimize performance) would yield the most benefit with 64-bit Windows.
    http://www.kingston.com/us/memory/search/Default.aspx?DeviceType=2&Mfr=LEN&Line=ThinkCentre&Model=85...

  • Which is better to use: BEx query or Web Application as an iView in portal?

    Hi gurus!
    Are there any experienced opinions, which is better - publish a BEx query in portal or publish a BEx Web Application in portal? Is it easier to alter the layout attributes etc. if I create a BEx Web Application first before publishing?
    What is the way of fixing for example filter item height if I publish BEx query in portal - is there a Web Application that it uses anyhow which I can fix? Or can I use in that case iView -properties in portal?
    Thankful for advice
    Sari

    ok, means i can use jsp:useBean tag for all my
    classes that are not actually bean. so it will be
    instantiated at run time and provide efficiency .No. Jsp:useBean is used for java bean components.
    >
    but when should i use import statement in my jsp and
    it happen at translation time so will it create any
    type of burden for my code if i import multiple
    classes.For non-java beans, you need to import the classes, period.
    It's not a burden, it's a necessity.

  • Which is better for performance Azure SQL Database or SQL Server in Azure VM?

    Hi,
    We are building an ASP.NET app that will be running on Microsoft Cloud which I think is the new name for Windows Azure. We're expecting this app to have many simultaneous users and want to make sure that we provide excellent performance to end users.
    Here are our main concerns/desires:
    Performance is paramount. Fast response times are very very important
    We want to have as little to do with platform maintenance as possible e.g. managing OS or SQL Server updates, etc.
    We are trying to use "out-of-the-box" standard features.
    With that said, which option would give us the best possible database performance: a SQL Server instance running in a VM on Azure or SQL Server Database as a fully managed service?
    Thanks, Sam

    hello,
    SQL Database using shared resources on the Microsft data centre. Microsoft balance the resource usage of SQL Database so that no one application continuously dominates any resource.You can try the 
    Premium Preview
    for Windows Azure SQL Database which offers better performance by guaranteeing a fixed amount of dedicated resources for a database.
    If you using SQL Server instance running in a VM, you control the operating system and database configuration. And the
    performance of the database depends on many factors such as the size of a virtual machine, and the configuration of the data disks.
    Reference:
    Choosing between SQL Server in Windows Azure VM & Windows Azure SQL Database
    Regards,
    Fanny Liu
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click here. 
    Fanny Liu
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • I have registered the wrong email address how do I change it

    I Have registered the wrong email address when setting up my iTunes how do I change it

  • Java Applet not loading

    I am running an FTP server "Rumpus" and generally it works very well. It does FTP and FTP via HTTP. We use it as an internal FTP server within our company. However, there is a drag and drop feature that has stopped working on most clients that are co

  • Oracle Service Bus 10gR3 - sbconsole missing

    Hi, I just installed Oracle Service Bus in an existing BEA home, containing just WebLogic Server 10gR3. When I start Weblogic and go to http://localhost:7001/sbconsole, I get an Error 404--Notfound. Also, in the Start menu there is no shortcut for "S

  • Testing problem

    Hi, i written the below code for Address updation SAP R/3 using BAPI's: Please look over it and tell if any more modifications i have to do. I didn't get the updation when i am testing. Please give me needful updation. DATA: BEGIN OF I_BUT000 OCCURS

  • Ignorning includes which starts with %

    Hi All, I am fetching Program name, and Include from the Table D010INC. but in the resulted output there are some includes that are begining with the symbol   %.  I don't want to display them in the final output. my select query is as follws.   SELEC