Which is better, FCS or CS4?

Im going to start making videos...
so, i would like your opinions on which is better, Final Cut Studio 3 or Creative Suite 4?
it would be better if the apps:
1. have templates
2. are easy to use (for beginners)
btw,
If CS4, I know that I'll get Photoshop.
But, FCS 3, does it has any Photoshop equivalents?
Soundbooth=CS4
Soundtrack Pro=FCS 3
Which is better?

If you are beginning, why don't you start with iMovie? It's already on your Mac and you can get an idea of what video editing is like. Both Final Cut Studio and Adobe CS5 have a high learning curve, and I wouldn't consider putting either one of them on a 13" laptop.
I really encourage you to consider your requirements & what kind of video you anticipate doing (home movies or are you planning to do commercials for Nike?). What level of experience do you currently have?

Similar Messages

  • Which is better to run CS4--high end PowerMac G5 or simple Mac Mini?

    I may soon have the opportunity to pick up a PowerMac G5 Dual Processor 2.5GHz 2GB RAM machine for about the same price as a new Mac Mini Intel Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz 2GB RAM. Should I opt for the Mini with Intel processors and only 64MB VRAM, or should I go for the PowerPC with the more capable video card? Are there any other important considerations for Creative Suite users?
    Thanks in advance for your feedback and suggestions!

    John,
    Neither is an ideal machine. 64MB VRAM (and other video card factors) is not sufficient to run all Photoshop features. But the G5 may also need a video card upgrade (check Adobe's list of appropriate cards), which may or not be practical. And more and more apps are being developed for Intel only, so you are buying dated technology either way.
    I'd be looking into a more capable Intel machine, either second-hand, refurbished, or as a lease (if for business).
    Neil

  • Any need to partition hard drives for FCS or CS4 on my new Mac Pro?

    This is my first post here but have learned a lot recently just by visiting various threads. I'm new to Mac and Final Cut Studio so I have a few questions about setting up the system and hard drives. I've read about partitions on hard drives on various sites but I wonder if that is outdated advice at this point. I will be learning FCS and CS4 by working on various SD DV and HDV/AVCHD projects so I want my system flexible but as high performance as I can muster. I will be working mostly in FCP and AfterEffects for a while and do intend to burn blu-ray discs eventually.
    My system is a current Mac Pro quad core with 8gb RAM with current versions of final cut and adobe suites. I will do a clean install with snow leopard. I have a 640gb main drive and I've purchased three 1tb Western Digital black internal drives. I am wondering if I need to partition my main drive because I may want to also run a windows OS eventually for blu-ray playback. The other 3 drives are intended for project files, media/capture and back-up respectively. I don't have the budget for a RAID at the moment. So my questions for this thread are:
    1. Do I need to partition the main drive now or should I wait until I need to do so with boot camp/windows installation later?
    2. If I should partition main drive now, how much should I dedicate for the second partition on the OS drive for eventual windows 7/blu-ray playback?
    3. Should I partition any of the three additional drives?
    4. If I should partition any of those additional drives, how many partitions should I make and what sizes should the partitions be for each drive?
    5. Is my plan for my four drives a sound one for my purposes? (os, projects, media, backup)
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Hi, and welcome.
    1. Don't partition your system drive until you need to. If you choose to run Windows via Bootcamp, you'll have to, in which case, 150GB will be plenty if all you want to do is playback (may even be overkill). However, you can probably do just as well running Windows under Parallels or VMWare, whch would be my recommendation. Performance is very good, and the ease of moving from OSX to Win makes them very convenient. Parallels (which I know better) automatically resizes the amount of space it needs to meet your usage. You can also run your Parallels virtual machine from somewhere other than your system disk. I imagine VMWare provides similar features. Both are well thought of.
    2. Your disk use plan is OK, with one caveat - if what you're working on is critical to you, you should also have an external backup. With backup on an internal drive, there's a (very small, but definite) risk that, if the Mac Pro hit a disaster, your backup would be lost. I'd suggest an external Firewire 800 or eSATA enclosure and, either another drive, or just use one of the WDs there instead of internally.
    3. Don't partition the other disks either. Just make sure they're formatted MAC OS Journaled (do this via Disk Utility). Another benefit of Parallels/VMWare is they allow Windows to read/write Mac formatted disks.
    Hope that helps

  • PP CS5/5.5 chroma key better than AE CS4?

    Hi everyone.
    I think I read somewhere a while back that the chroma key in PP CS5/5.5 is better than AE CS4's Keylight. In fact, the PP effect may be an improved Keylight , but I can't recall this for certain.
    Can anyone verify this?
    Thx.
    Paul

    I've keyed with the same camera for a couple of years now, and it's got a pretty narrow band in which greens are easily keyed. DVCPRO HD is not well-reputed for its handling of greens, or at least as a result of it's use with an older 1/3" sensor. I've gotten the best results with the exposure on the screen at about 50-60IRE, but that's just in my scenarios. Most of my material is recorded to P2 cards (though I did one long shoot with OnLo and a green screen), but the footage encoding is the same--it's all DVCPRO HD. I've got some stuff that I did recently that keyed like buttah with Ultra--I literally had a solid key in 20 seconds with just picking the background color and tweaking a couple parameters.
    So, since "brightly lit" and "lower lit" are subjective terms, it's hard to give you any specific recommendations other than to try to stick in a particular exposure range. All I know is that when your green screen footage is evenly lit and at mid-range exposure, Ultra does a pretty good job with minimal effort.

  • Which is better for gaming and why?

    Hi,
    I was researching budget gaming laptops(around $1000, INR 55000) and came up with two choices.....
    1)HP Pavilion g6z-1d00 Notebook PC
    http://shopping2.hp.com/en_US/home-office/-/products/Laptops/HP-Pavilion/A2B39AV?HP-Pavilion-g6z-1d0...
    2)HP Envy 14-2130nr Notebook PC
    http://shopping2.hp.com/en_US/home-office/-/products/Laptops/HP-ENVY/QE295UA?HP-ENVY-14-2130nr-Noteb...
    Could anybody please tell me which is better for gaming (main purpose and best performance)?
    The HP Envy looks great but I don't know much about AMD Quad Core.....
    Also, is it possible to upgrade the graphics card on the HP Envy ( AMD Radeon 6630 to a better one) via a HP centre?
    It seems to run most games quite well, but I need it to be able to play new games for at least 4 years more (college), while not factoring in the costs for any possible graphics card upgrade....
    Please help!!

    Thanks Huffer _ very useful.
     I wasn't aware that there was a heat problem with the i7 processors, my dv8 runs at around 42 to 52 degrees, mind you I don't really put it under much load. I use it to play Blu-ray ISO files on my projector and for photo editing (Adobe CS4), it's an 820QM.
     I have also changed the thermal compound to ICDiamond and drilled holes in the speaker cover to improve air flow, that made a difference too.
     @ abhishekmaha
     Don't take my comment to seriously, although I think it has some truth to it, it was meant to poke a bit of fun at you. 
     Heat has always been one of the biggest factors when it comes to any computer, designers try to make them thinner, lighter and cheaper and those types don't work for gaming very well. They're OK for the occasional one, but not on a regular basis. I believe that if you game on any machine that was not meant for it, you will not get 4 years out of it _ 2 years.
     I wish I could tell you different, but I am not going to lie to you.
     Heat basically affects 3 things on a laptop, the solder that holds the components on the motherboard, any mechanical moving parts, eg the hard drive, fan _ and the battery. You can remove the battery to prolong its life when gaming.
     Heat breaks down the solder over time and the mother board simply stops working as far as the hard drive, it stops spinning because the tiny bearing(s) in there dry out and seize up.
     If you don't want to use a cooling mat then prop up the back of the laptop, hanging it over the edge of the table will expose the fan intake, but will block off other vents.
     60 degrees is a bit warm too, 50 is better or rather, the cooler the better. What ever machine you get, make a note of what the temps are when you first boot up and when it's hot. The idea is to get an average so you can judge when it is dangerously getting hot.
     P.S. Be sure and give Huffer a kudos too.

  • Free dvd maker is better than encore cs4

    Hi Forum,
    OS: Win Vista Ultimate 64bit
    Encore CS4
    Windows DVD Maker
    I have shot some footage and have they in dvd pal format.
    I was able to create a motion menu, slide show and advd with encore cs4. i could play the dvd on pcs and normal dvd player on the tv.
    But: Slide Show and all Movies are flickering. Menu also.
    Than i tryed Windows DVD Maker (Free when you have Ultimate Vista).
    I used there absolutely the same videos and photos. Result: Slide show and video quality was perfect and without flickering problems.
    I spent a lot of money and o can not believe that this free tool dvd maker is better than encore cs4.
    so please help me to solve this problem.
    I really don't know what i could try.
    Thank you and see you soon.

    Hi,
    Could somebody tell me which settings i should set on premiere cs4 to export in a good format to import to encore cs4?
    Maybe i could solve my problem on using the right settings on exporting a video from premiere cs4.
    Thank you

  • TLFTextField or TLF, which is better to use in CS5?

    Hi,
    I have been developing content using TLF with CS4 and in Flash Builder. Recently when I switched to CS5, there was this cool TLFTextField. So now I wonder, TLFTextField or TLF, which is better to use in CS5? Almost all of my text will be dynamically generated. Please share your thoughts - possibly with pros and cons.
    ~ Shiyaz

    I assume you've found TLFTextField in Flash Pro (I can't remember if Flash Builder made a TLFTextField class or not). Anyway, if you're considering using Flash Pro, here's some background on the TLFTextField class:
    This class was created primarily for backwards compatibility with Classic Text coding. If you used Flash Pro CS 4 or earlier versions, and you wrote ActionScript for your text objects, you were using TextField objects. So, when you upgraded to CS 5, and you decided to convert all your old Classic text objects to the new TLF objects, all your code would have broken were it not for TLFTextField class. TLFTextField implements the TextField API so that your existing TextField code can be used in the TLF environment.
    So, if you're an ActionScript programmer who is already comfortable programming using the TextField API, it certainly makes sense to continue doing so but using TLFTextField objects. However, if you want to take advantage of the new TLF features, the old API doesn't really give you the ability to do that. So, the TLFTextField provided a new API:
    function get textFlow():TextFlow;
    The TextFlow class is the top level class of the TLF model objects. Using that object, you can then set attributes on your text just as if you were working with TextFlow in Flash Builder. So, in essence, TLFTextField provides backwards compatibility, continued use of the familiar API set, and access to the TextFlow model class.
    Another nuance to be aware of is that if you choose to embed fonts, TLF requires the newer "DF4" (for DefineFont4, based on the SWF Tag name) vs. the older "DF3" fonts that TextField requires. For text on the stage, Flash Pro will do all the tricky work for deciding when to embed DF3 and when to embed DF4 fonts, but just be aware that mixing Classic text and TLF text when using embedded fonts can cause a "double tax" on your SWF size because it may embed the same font both as DF3 and DF4.
    Good Luck!
    Rusty

  • Which is better to use: BEx query or Web Application as an iView in portal?

    Hi gurus!
    Are there any experienced opinions, which is better - publish a BEx query in portal or publish a BEx Web Application in portal? Is it easier to alter the layout attributes etc. if I create a BEx Web Application first before publishing?
    What is the way of fixing for example filter item height if I publish BEx query in portal - is there a Web Application that it uses anyhow which I can fix? Or can I use in that case iView -properties in portal?
    Thankful for advice
    Sari

    ok, means i can use jsp:useBean tag for all my
    classes that are not actually bean. so it will be
    instantiated at run time and provide efficiency .No. Jsp:useBean is used for java bean components.
    >
    but when should i use import statement in my jsp and
    it happen at translation time so will it create any
    type of burden for my code if i import multiple
    classes.For non-java beans, you need to import the classes, period.
    It's not a burden, it's a necessity.

  • Which is better for performance Azure SQL Database or SQL Server in Azure VM?

    Hi,
    We are building an ASP.NET app that will be running on Microsoft Cloud which I think is the new name for Windows Azure. We're expecting this app to have many simultaneous users and want to make sure that we provide excellent performance to end users.
    Here are our main concerns/desires:
    Performance is paramount. Fast response times are very very important
    We want to have as little to do with platform maintenance as possible e.g. managing OS or SQL Server updates, etc.
    We are trying to use "out-of-the-box" standard features.
    With that said, which option would give us the best possible database performance: a SQL Server instance running in a VM on Azure or SQL Server Database as a fully managed service?
    Thanks, Sam

    hello,
    SQL Database using shared resources on the Microsft data centre. Microsoft balance the resource usage of SQL Database so that no one application continuously dominates any resource.You can try the 
    Premium Preview
    for Windows Azure SQL Database which offers better performance by guaranteeing a fixed amount of dedicated resources for a database.
    If you using SQL Server instance running in a VM, you control the operating system and database configuration. And the
    performance of the database depends on many factors such as the size of a virtual machine, and the configuration of the data disks.
    Reference:
    Choosing between SQL Server in Windows Azure VM & Windows Azure SQL Database
    Regards,
    Fanny Liu
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click here. 
    Fanny Liu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Which is better??????

    which is better?Dam really confused which speaker to buy??
    i currently have a creative m2600.but am not getting enough performance or that feel while watching movies like avatar,step up 3 etc......so am planning to buy a 5.1.......not planning but i have decided to buy a 5.1....so..
    which is better? the 6160 or 6060 or 6100.
    which of these will provide me relly great exprience while playing games and most importantly while whatching hd movies and while listening to music.......
    and other than this what i have to ask is...what is this "db" in speakers. i mean while looking at a speaker specs we can see it..like 65db,85db,75db..etc........
    and when i compared specs of the three speakers i mentioned above i saw that the 6160 has low "db"........why is that?

    The specs is just a guide, you won't be able to tell the slight difference in db using just your ears. Besides, it is just a comparison between the level of a music to the level of background noise, it does not necessary mean which speaker sounds better. If possible, please make a trip to your local electronics store and try out the speakers system yourself.

  • Which is better, Photoshop or Corel?

    Which is better, Photoshop or Corel? I am finding the best one to use for my website [link removed]. Let me know your opinion. Tks all.

    Thank you! I am trying to find the best one for the site [Link removed].
    I used to use Corel before, but now, I am trying to use Photoshop.
    Tk you anyway
    [Removed link]
    Message was edited by: sinious

  • Which is better software for brochures and PDF forms ? Photoshop or InDesign ?

    Which is better software for brochures and PDF forms ? Photoshop or InDesign ? and why ?

    If you are going to be making a lot of brochures, with photos, you probably want both. Photoshop to edit the photos, and InDesign to assemble and layout images with text.

  • Which is better an android or apple

    Which is better getting an android smart phone or an Apple I Phone?

    As the poster Horses 547 said its a matter of personal preference. However I own and use both. Printing via air print is smooth and easy on an iphone. Printing on a android phone is iffy and tedious and you will have to find an app to print since there is no native app to do so. I purchased http://www.printhand.com which costs around $12 from the app store. but it is in my opinion the best printing app out there for android. I use it on my android tablet as well and its great. This company is the maker of the print app on iphones.
    The iphone is a little harder to put your own ringtone on the device. However very easy from the Itunes you put on your computer and hook into.
    Another thing an iphone does is if you use their cloud service or pay for a song it is available on all your ios devices. Iphone, ipad, or ipod or up to five computers registered through itunes on those computers.
    Google play music also can sync with all your android devices.
    Iphone don't have external Micro SD card slots, so the storage on the phone is all you have.
    Iphones use imessage which does not count against your text allotment  to another iphone or ipad user. it send regular text to non iphone users.
    Another thing is Face Time but I found a better program called oovoo at http://www.oovoo.com or in the Google Play Store for free.
    Iphones are paper thin but I have an android that has a larger view area and is also paper thin and light. Depending on the android phone it may have a removable battery, whereas iphones are sealed as are some new androids. I have found the sound for music better on my iphone, and videos are crystal clear. Again on some better androids the music and video is comparable .
    There is really not many differences but it up to the user.
    One last good thing is iphones are updated via Apple, no long waits for OS updates like is done with Android devices, and android devices on Verizon.

  • Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS, or others?

    Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS, or
    others?
    I am used to using brush function more conveniently in Flash
    4 than the other versions I ve tried. However, Flash 4 doesn't have
    pen tool.
    Free News Reader
    http://put.hk
    http://put.hk/reader/forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.flash.html

    1Evan2Wing3 wrote:
    > Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS,
    or others?
    >
    > I am used to using brush function more conveniently in
    Flash 4 than the other versions I ve tried. However, Flash 4
    doesn't have pen tool.
    all pretty identical tho I would go with cs, just because I
    like the GUI much
    more than other versions...
    Best Regards
    Urami
    "Never play Leap-Frog with a Unicorn."
    <urami>
    If you want to mail me - DO NOT LAUGH AT MY ADDRESS
    </urami>

  • Which is better for bulk message scenario in sap xi RFC or Proxy

    which is better for bulk message scenario in ( RFC or Proxy ) ?
    Edited by: prabhatxi on Aug 6, 2010 4:44 PM

    Proxy will alwaays be better option in this case, as it is adapter less framework, and communication happens directly with XI central integration engine. So it is always fast communication and gives good performance.
    But still you should consider other factors, you may consider using RFC as well, as sometime we go for RFC/IDOC as this are the standard interfaces already available rather than creating structure...
    May be you can share more info on what type/volume data are you planning to send via XI?
    Hope this cleart your doubt..
    Divyesh

Maybe you are looking for