Which is better in term of power consumption for L...

Hello!
I would like to know in terms of power consumption which connection type should I use on my Lumia 1020. 4G LTE or 3G. I'm not a person who watches movies on his smartphone, and I don't browse the Internet intensively using my smartphone. I use it to take pictures, check my e-mails, access Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Flickr.
Thank you.
Cosmin Petrenciuc

3G is in general less power hungry.

Similar Messages

Power Consumption for iMac 20" INTEL DUO CORE

I need to know which is the power consumption for the 20" 2.16 GHz INTEL CORE DUO. I want to buy a UPS for this machine and I could not figure out in any place within the manual where to get that information. It is something that have to be very easy to find but it was not the case for me in this opportunity.
I cannot believe that I have to create a post in order to get this answer!
Kind regards to all and thanks for any clue that any one can give me.
iMAC 2.16 Dual CORE 20" Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Welcome to the discussions!
Another vote for APC. I use the XS900 for my first gen G5 iMac and it works very nicely without their PowerChute software. It even comes with the correct USB cable to hook it into your Mac.

Which is better a bluetooth or usb cable for conne...

i'm using a GPRS for my internet connection. i'd like to ask which is better a bluetooth or usb cable for connectivity? does a bluetooth or usb cable affect the performance of my connection? which one got a better data transfer rate and does not always drop a connection?

USB is better and faster

Code comparission which is better in terms of performance

In my pl/sql procedure the following code exist
SELECT count(*) INTO L_exists
          FROM txt
     WHERE templ_id in (ISecurTempl,ESecurTempl);
Now i want to replace the query with
SELECT count(*) INTO L_exists
          FROM txt
WHERE templ_id in (                                                       SELECT INT_SEC_TMP FROM table(cast(parse_table as sec_template_tbl))
                                                  UNION
SELECT EXT_SEC_TMP FROM table(cast(parse_table as sec_template_tbl))
Can you please tell me which part of code is better in terms of performance
and why?
Thanks in advance

I want to know which is betterThere's not enough information for anyone here to be able to tell you.
Obviously the first one "looks" faster, but without knowing the tables, structure, data, indexes, platform etc. etc. etc. we won't have a clue.

Which is better in terms of performance

Dear All,
which is better..
to use FOR ALL ENTRIES or
to build a range and use WHERE IN RANGE_TABLE .. Does this have data limitation problem.
is there a better method?
Thanks,
Raghavendra
Moderator message - Please search before asking - post locked
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jul 7, 2009 10:53 AM

I want to know which is betterThere's not enough information for anyone here to be able to tell you.
Obviously the first one "looks" faster, but without knowing the tables, structure, data, indexes, platform etc. etc. etc. we won't have a clue.

Power consumption for router and switch

I have a linksys EZSX88W switch which I checked power consumption of 70ma idle. It's supplied by the adapter which has an output of 1000ma. Not sure what the consumption when switch is being used. I also have an WRT54GS but haven't checked consumption yet, but it's powered by the same 1000ma adapter. In an effort to save energy-that -GREEN FEELING- I was thinking of using on power adapter to power bothe the router and switch. Has anyone tried this yet?? Also if I posted this in the wrong area I hope the moderator will move the post.
thanks

So you are thinking of Powering on both the Devices using a single Power Adapter? Well never tried to make both the devices use a single power adapter. As far as i think its not possible. But if you still wish, you can give a try and check if that works for you or not.

Power consumption for latest mac pros?

I read on Apple.com somewhere that the 2008 Mac pro's maximum power consumption is 260+ Watts for a Quad-core. How different is it for the new Mac pros?

I guess English is a lost language now.
For the Mac Pro it is really really simple and based on 7 yrs of PowerMac G5s and then Mac Pro owners: 1500VA - you can get by with slightly smaller 1300VA and some people, because of better build, used SMART UPS 1000VA.
And as I said in another thread, the Mac Pro 'suffers' from inrush current that can knock out smaller UPS, and people that have tried to use 500-900VA units got into a lot of trouble and had to upgrade.
No one can know the total system watts used other than use a KILLAWATT on the power cord.
Look at the case, can an iMac dispel as much heat as easily? no. It is designed for lower power and much fewer components.
Core i7 has HyperTransport and Turbo boost for one thing. Apple had a huge coding problem with audio (incl iTunes and others), flash and Nehalem based systems. High cpu temperature and lost processor cycles and performance.
The 2010 Mac Pro can do more for the same, and DDR3 lowered heat and watts noticeably.
There are sites where you can plug in various components and get an idea of how large a PSU would be needed. Try one of those, too. PSU efficiency, and there is "overhead" needed for the motherboard chips and to run PCI Express for graphics, Firewire, etc. It all adds up.
Apple's example is low-end system configuration, the chart says CPU MAX, not SYSTEM (but then, most everything on hardware requirements lately needs a grain of salt).
Quad-core 2.66GHz configuration:
One 2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" 3500 series processor,
3GB memory (three 1GB 1066MHz DDR3 ECC DIMMs),
640 GB Serial ATA 3 Gb/s 7200-rpm hard drive,
18x double-layer SuperDrive,
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512MB of GDDR3 memory
APC we know, whether PowerMac 2.0DP from 2003 or Quad G5, or Mac Pro, that 1500VA is strongly recommended.

Power consumption for 7100?

Hi:
Does anybody know what is the power consumption of the 7100 series device in the 'idle' mode and 'call' mode?
Can not seem to find this information....
Thank you

Welcome to the discussions!
Another vote for APC. I use the XS900 for my first gen G5 iMac and it works very nicely without their PowerChute software. It even comes with the correct USB cable to hook it into your Mac.

Which is better 7200 RPM HDD or SSD for laptop upgrade to boost rendering times?

This is my current setup
RAM: 8GB
Processor: Intel Core i7-3630QM
GPU: Nvidia Geforce GT 635M - 2GB
OS: Windows 8.1
Storage: 1TB 5400 RPM HDD
I am going to start editing raw footage in premiere pro. I would like to update my laptop to help with rendering times. Tommorow I will be installing 16GB of RAM. Which will be better for storage a 7200rpm HDD or and SDD drive? I am seeing conflicting views on the web. I figured that this will be the best place to ask, since I am upgrading primarily for this program. I appreciate the help.

No clue what would be conflicting between the two. Both the internal operating speed of data handling and the i/o to the system over any sustained period of time are so vastly higher for a modern and large-ish SSD compared to any HDD that it is a total no-brainer. In fact, on the tweaker's page, they point out that for a really monster system, set up RAID's of multiple SSD's. Lacking that, RAID's of four or five linked fast LARGE HDD's which will be noticeably slower than the SSD option but typically better than single HDD's, even using one for each part of the process.
For both the processing of data to present a view on the monitor during editing and during rendering, it's not the "burst" speed numbers that count ... it's the sustained long-term data transfer counts that matter. Which are different from what many think they are ...
neil

Which is better 12 powerbook or 14 ibook for final cut exprees hd?

which is a better for final cut express HD a 12 powerbook or a 14 ibook? which one should I buy (refurbished of course)

In another post i resolved that a 12 powerbook would be a better choice than a 14 ibbok

Which is better having many Window User Accounts for the same person, so to have many Firefoxes or have many Firefoxes under one Windows Account User?

Right now I have around 6 Window User Accounts (just for me on one computer) because I did not know that I could put more then one Firefox per account. I have to leave the tabs up when I close Firefox because if I just bookmark them I wont finish my work I was doing with those sites. Now that I know how to put multiple Firefoxes under one user account. Which would make my computer fast or does it not matter, if I put all my Firefoxes on one Window user account or have 6 Window user accounts, each with their own Firefox?
-Thanks

It is more work to switch to another Windows account then to open another Firefox instance with another profile.
If you only use the other windows accounts for using Firefox that way and not for other purposes then there is nothing against switching to only one Windows account to make it easier to manage things as backing up your personal data or copying your data between the other profiles.
So it is up to you if you want to switch to only one Windows account.
See also:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Opening_a_new_instance_of_Firefox_with_another_profile
*https://developer.mozilla.org/Mozilla/Multiple_Firefox_Profiles

Cisco 2960 Power Consumption

Hi,
I am planning to use above switch for my project.
Please let me know the exact power consideration for this switch.
[ 27W (AC) or 130W (AC) (100V x 1.3A) ] Power Consumption = Volt x Current.
I have below two snaps from your site, hence got confused which value to be considered as power consumption for this switch.
Link:
http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/support/model/tsd_hardware_switch_model_296024tcl.html#0
Case 1:
Case2:
What should I consider as power required for Switch ?
Is it 1.3A @ 110/240 VAC ?
Or
Is it 30W ?
Thanks in advance,
Amit

I'm using EnergyWise. I don't see any relevance as to WHY you would want to use it. I also don't see any information about your PoE requirement, hence, no comment on how you'd like to save money by powering down PoE.
The power requirement for the 4506 would, most likely, be LESS than getting six PoE switches individually.
I mean, if you don't use PoE, the line cards will only draw what is required. So trying to save money from energy consumption of the chassis won't make a lot of sense.

Which is better, a G4-450 Dual or a Mac Mini 1.42?

which is better in terms of Sequencing and plug in performace, the G4-450 Dual or a Mac Mini 1.42?

G4-450GHz Dual with 896MB RAM
Mac Mini 1.42GHz with 1 gig of Ram
G4-450GHz Dual gets more instances with plugs, more tracks and performance then the 1.4GHz 17" Powerbook, 12" powerbook and Mac Mini which all have the same G4 processor.,
Today, i took the same 34 track session,
-all 34 tracks have a Logic Comp, Eq, Gate
-and also 8 Buses with Comp, EQ, Gates, Delays, Flange, Phasors, Pitch Shifters, 2 Reverbs (1 long and 1 plated) as well as some other toys.
-Master with Waves Ren Comp, Logic EQ.
-6 esx24 Instruments with high loads ( Harps, Strings, Cellos, Drums and Perc)
-8 Long (16 Bar) drum tracks ( Bass, HH, Snare, Toms, Overheads, Fills, Percussion dubs)
-4 Vocal takes and Dubs (more then 16 Bars long)
-Bass Track
-2 Acoustic stereo tracks
-4 Guitar tracks, dubbs and fills
-4 Slide Acoustic guitar tracks
-4 dubbed effect vocal tracks
AT first, he G4-450GHz Dual choked with 2 errors, then it buffered into the session well and played everything back fine of the same FW drive.
The mac mini got major problems and only performed 28 tracks with the esx24 tracks frozen, and from time to time after heating up chokes again, i had to wait a few minutes before i bounced the session due to overload errors.
Over all, Both have G4 Processors and about 1GIG ram (450GHz Dual is under 1 GIG), but its a clear fact that double processors win, even the lowest 450GHz Dual is still hotter then any flashy fast Bused mac mini, powerbook or iMac.

Which is better String null or should i initialize to blank ?

Hi
I am persisting one string in coherence which can be null for few cases. so putting null or blank which is better in coherence ?

Assignment "null" for String references is good because Coherence will use less space of storage during serialization. It other terms, this is good for performance during replication and synchronization.
Cheers,
Ricardo Ferreira

Touch or Classic? Which is better (quality)?

Which is better in terms of sound quality?

Classics. The Older 5.5 gens and Older series Ipods. The Newer 5.5 gens and the 6th Gens use a new sound chip. Same as for the Ipod Touches but Im not 100% sure with the Iphones.
Be careful though, The Ipods with that use the old style sound chip, which is far superior in quality of sound, wasn't soldered well and the chip can seperate with The constant temperature change and unobserved pressure applied to the unit when its in your pocket, book bag... ect.
Now Im not going to say that is 100% positive. Its just from experience owning a few new and older Ipods/Iphones.
Besides, How many older Mp3 plays can literally blow out your Earbuds{quality earbuds} if played too loud. I owned Bose Series{IE 2} in ear headphones and klipsch In ear Headphones{S5I Rugged series}.... The Key word is "Owned" lol.
Find an Older model that works great and compare it to the newer models. You will Hear the DIfference... or make you deaf in the process LOL.

Which is better in term of power consumption for L...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for