Which is better verizon or att for cellular?

which is better verizon or att for cellular?

The 3/4G iPads are Verizon or ATT. You choose which one you want when you buy the iPad. It can't be changed.
 Cheers, Tom

Similar Messages

Which is better MAMP or XAMMP for OS X Mavericks?

Which is better MAMP or XAMMP for OS X Mavericks? Hope I will get the information with Pros and Cons of both application...

Which is better MAMP or XAMMP for OS X Mavericks? Hope I will get the information with Pros and Cons of both application...

Differences between verizon and att for facetime?

any restrictions? wifi required for both?

yeah att wont let all its customers use facetime on 3g but verizon does. att is blocking all its customers that are not on a family share data plan so they cant use facetime on 3g !!!!!! do unfair att !!!!!!!!

Which 3G iPad 2 is better, Verizon or ATT?

I am going to buy a 3G iPad 2 and I would like some advice on whether ATT or Verizon has better service. I have iphones on both ATT and Verizon and one is not really any better than the other.

tom4jax wrote:
...I have iphones on both ATT and Verizon and one is not really any better than the other.
Then, you won't see an appreciable difference between the iPads. If you ever plan to travel overseas and want local 3G (as opposed to roaming 3G), the AT&T version has a Sim card which you can replace with a local Sim card.

Which is better: extractValue or existsNode for Performance

Hi,
We have XMLDB Table with only 1 Column (XMLType) created using below:
create table TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML( AGREEMENT_XML XMLType )
     XMLTYPE COLUMN AGREEMENT_XML XMLSCHEMA "ABQuote_V1.xsd" ELEMENT "Quote"
          VARRAY AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."SHIPPING_PARTIES"
               STORE AS TABLE SHIPPING_PARTIES_NT
               ((PRIMARY KEY (NESTED_TABLE_ID, ARRAY_INDEX) ENABLE))
          VARRAY AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."SALES_OFFICE_CODES"."STRING_WRAPPERS"
               STORE AS TABLE SALES_OFFICE_CODES_NT
          ((PRIMARY KEY (NESTED_TABLE_ID, ARRAY_INDEX) ENABLE))
     TABLESPACE RGM_ME_DATA;
alter table TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML
add constraint TNM_AGREEMENT_XML_PK primary key (AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."AGREEMENT_ID",
                              AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."AGREEMENT_VERSION")
using index tablespace RGM_ME_INDX;
We populated around 500K rows and have been seeing some Performance Issues
in accessing data from above Table, at times.
What is difference between extractValue and existsNode in terms of performance?
Here are sample queries:
SELECT extract(AGREEMENT_XML, '/') "Quote" FROM TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML WHERE extractValue(AGREEMENT_XML, '/Quote/Identifier') = ‘00003554’
SELECT extract(AGREEMENT_XML, '/') "Quote" FROM TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML WHERE existsNode(AGREEMENT_XML, '/Quote[Identifier = "00003554"]') = 1
Which of the above would be better to use existsNode or extractValue.
In above case, both the queries are expected to return Single Row (searched
using Quote Identifier, which is defined as PK of Table) and query explain plan does
show usage of PK for above queries.
Thanks
user641521

In theory existsNode can be slightly better, however in you cases the two queries are not identical.
Also there are a number of other issues with your query..
1. extract(AGREEMENT_XML, '/') is not required. You should just have the AGREEMENT_XML column. Extract is only need when extracting a fragment from the XML. Since you are returning the entire document the use of extract(column,'/') is redundant, but can cause performance issues..
THis query should be written as
SELECT AGREEMENT_XML "Quote"
FROM TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML
WHERE extractValue(AGREEMENT_XML, '/Quote/Identifier') = ‘00003554’
and can be written using existsNode as
SELECT AGREEMENT_XML "Quote"
FROM TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML
WHERE existsNode(AGREEMENT_XML, '/Quote[Identifier="00003554"]') = 1
Assuming Identifier can only occur once inside Quote. If Identifier can occur multiple times inside Quote then the existsNode version would still work while the extractValue version would return errors

Which is better or 'standard' option for a Delta DTP request

Hi folks,
I am creating a delta DTP for loading HR Payroll data. While creating the DTP I see two options
a) Only Get Delta once
b) Get all new data request by request
which is a better option if I have a lot of records to upload for every delta upload.
Points waiting to be given to you...
Thanks
Sunil

U should go with Get all new data request by request
i. With Only Get Delta Once, define if the source requests should be transferred only once.
Setting this flag ensures that the content of the InfoProvider is an exact representation of the source data.
A scenario of this type may be required if you always want an InfoProvider to contain the most recent data for a query, but technical reasons prevent the DataSource on which it is based from delivering a delta (new, changed or deleted data records). For this type of DataSource, the current data set for the required selection can only be transferred using a full update.
In this case, a DataStore object cannot normally be used to determine the missing delta information (overwrite and create delta). If this is not logically possible because, for example, data is deleted in the source without delivering reverse records, you can set this flag and perform a snapshot scenario. Only the most recent request for this DataSource is retained in the InfoProvider. Earlier requests for the DataSource are deleted from the (target) InfoProvider before a new one is requested (this is done by a process in a process chain, for example). They are not transferred again by the DTP delta process. When the system determines the delta when a new DTP request is generated, these earlier (source) requests are considered to have been retrieved
ii. Define if you want to Get All New Data in Source Request by Request.
Since a DTP bundles all transfer-relevant requests from the source, it sometimes generates large requests. If you do not want to use a single DTP request to transfer the dataset from the source because the dataset is too large, you can set the Get All New Data in Source Request by Request flag. This specifies that you want the DTP to read only one request from the source at a time. Once processing is completed, the DTP request checks for further new requests in the source. If it finds any, it automatically creates an additional DTP request.
u201COnly get Delta Onceu201D
/people/community.user/blog/2007/06/21/sap-netweaver-70-bi-data-transfer-process-with-147only-get-delta-once148
u201CGet Data by Requestu201D
/people/community.user/blog/2007/06/21/sap-netweaver-70-bi-data-transfer-process-with-147get-data-by-request148

Which is better group by or for all entries in

We have more than 11 Lac Records in AUFM table.
I am working on a Report to find SO to Production Order to AUFM (for raw material).
It's ALV OOP.
Which code will give better result - For AUFM fetch with key AUFNR.
GROUP BY matnr
OR
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_previous
Moderator message: too vague to give decent advice, please try yourself first and compare runtimes, re-post including all relevant information if required, please use international units only when posting again.
Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum
locked by: Thomas Zloch on Sep 8, 2010 10:13 AM

that oracle wont work if we have group by on a column which is character data type instead of number data typeEither he has been taught wrongly OR he has come across one specific case where it seems that there was an issue but he doesn't know enough about that case and is making a generalisation.
Hemant K Chitale

Which is better??? for loop or bulk collect

declare
cursor test is
select * from employees;
begin
open test;
loop
exit when test%notfound;
fetch test into myvar_a(i); CASE A
i:=i+1;
end loop;
close test;
open test;
fetch test bulk collect into myvar_b; CASE B
close test;
end;
Which case is better?? A or B?
Edited by: Kakashi on May 31, 2009 12:54 AM

Depends on the meaning of better.
Generally case B should be faster although a bit more elaborate code is required.
But there may be exceptions. I think I read somewhere (I'm home now and I cannot find it at the moment) that in 10g (or 11g - not sure) 100 rows at a time are pre-fetched behind scenes even when you use case A. So using case B with a low limit could well be slower.
If I can express an additional opinion case F(irst) is nearly always the best i.e. plain SQL (no loops at all). I'm aware that sometimes it cannot be used, but should be the first approach to be tried.
Regards
Etbin
FOUND: http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:213366500346264333
CONTAINS
Hey Tom, love the site. I noticed in your first fetch, which was in the first for loop that did an unconditional exit:
2 for x in ( select rownum r, t1.* from big_table.big_table t1 )
3 loop
4 exit;
5 end loop;
In looking at the TKPROF output for that query, it shows the number of rows being fetched as 100. Does that prove / demonstrate the bulk collecting optimization that Oracle added in 10g, where it implicitly and automatically does a bulk collect of limit 100 behind the scenes?
This came up at a discussion at my site very recently, and I think I can just point them to your example here as a demo rather than creating my own. I assume that if you ran the same thing in 9iR2, then that first fetch of rows in TKPROF would only show 1?
Followup April 18, 2007 - 1pm US/Eastern:
yes, that demonstrates the implicit array fetch of 100 rows...
in 9i, it would show 1 row fetched.
Edited by: Etbin on 31.5.2009 10:38

Which is better to run Quicken for Windows - Parallels or CrossOver?

I have the latest version of Parallels Desktop 8 for Macintosh. I use Windows Vista Home Edition with it. The only Windows program I need to run is Quicken 2013 Deluxe for Windows which runs a little slow on Parallels. Does anyone know if the latest version of CrossOver would allow the Quicken program to run quicker? The CrossOver site says it runs Windows programs natively on the Mac. Does natively mean quicker? I'd rather not clog up my computer with Windows if I don't need it.

I'm designing a form that will act as a full screen menu to control access to a large number of forms & reports. Since call_form & run_report_object search for forms & reports on Windows using the forms_path & reports_path I was considering using URLs and the web.show_document built-in to run each form & report from the menu form that was why I was asking if there are any advantages of one method over another.

Which is better: XDCAM or ProRes for editing and upload?

I am trying to determine if I'm better of staying with my native XDCAM files or instead converting them to one of the Pro Res codecs? One of my main issues is that the files that I upload to YouTube never look as good as I feel they ought to, nor as good as other HD files that I've seen online.

Well, neither would be good to upload. YouTube wants H.264.
Both look good. ProRes is easier on the system, smoother to edit, but has larger file sizes. XDCAM native isn't bad to work with, it just can take longer to do final rendering...depending on the system you are using to edit.
Both will convert to H.264 and look good.
Shane

Which is better: Pages or Word for Mac?

Hi everyone! I'm thinking about buying Pages but I never seen it in action. So to all of you who use Pages, please tell me how you like it.
Domonique

To be honest, I was suspicious too about the question if Pages could compete with my daily work load in Word. After using it now for everything, from invoicing to a complex Information Architecture concept, I have to admit that Pages has superseded Word. Here is why:
- It is much more intuitive and has a high grade of usability. The user experience is advanced over Word
- It finally offers intuitive handling of styles. This is the first time I can actually *define and apply styles without them getting into the way with every step I do, a big improvement over Word
- I don't have to dig through a thousand windows and tabs to make one typographic function work with another one
- In my testing, I achieved up to 75% quicker results in the same timeframe, mostly through improved usability. I could concentrate on thinking and didn't have to look for things buried in a preference pane
I am not John Grisham and I am not an accountant. I don't intend to use Pages to write a legal document with a thousand annotations.
For everything else, I fail to see what exactly it is that would make Word more advanced than Pages, other than us users being too comfortable to improve our work flow, stubbornly sticking with our worn out shoes.
After an initial setup time to get used working with it, I haven't found a single thing I couldn't do with Pages.

Which is better iPad or Mac for high school students?

I just took SHSAT and my mother promise me that I will get one that I wish if I get in. I did not want to waste that wish and use it on others wastable stuff. So I was thinking that Apple device would make great studying for me in High School. I have iMac but Macbook air is portable and ipad is portable. Both of them are really good. I don't know what to choose. If you can't decide as well, please suggest what should I get. And Please do not tell me I won't go in to spealized high school because I already have a lot of stress.

MacBook Air is the best of both worlds.
The instant on and fast response of an iPad, but has the full size keyboard, full OS X and expandablity of a Mac computer.
The MacBook Air is almost as light as an iPad, but is much more flexible.

Which is better in terms of performance

Dear All,
which is better..
to use FOR ALL ENTRIES or
to build a range and use WHERE IN RANGE_TABLE .. Does this have data limitation problem.
is there a better method?
Thanks,
Raghavendra
Moderator message - Please search before asking - post locked
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jul 7, 2009 10:53 AM

I want to know which is betterThere's not enough information for anyone here to be able to tell you.
Obviously the first one "looks" faster, but without knowing the tables, structure, data, indexes, platform etc. etc. etc. we won't have a clue.

Which is better in custom self service function SIT or EIT??

Hi Guru,
I have requirements of loan request to be through self service,the end of the approval cycle i will use user hook to create loan element entry for the employee.
I want to know which is better to be used for this function SIT or EIT ?? which is better in validations on submit page level.
Regards

Hello,
Below thread may provide more informations on difference between SIT and EIT.
Basis of choosing EIT, SIT and Addition Information DFF
Regards,
Saurabh

Which ios6 Beta outside US for iPad 3rd generation? ATT or Verizon?

which ios6 Beta outside US for iPad 3rd generation? ATT or Verizon?

I'm wondering the same, since the developer forums have been down since the release.

Which is better verizon or att for cellular?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for