Which Performance Counter tells the CPU Utilization

Hi,
I am new to Performance testing and wanted to know, Which Performance Counter tells the CPU Utilization of any Application hosted on Win 2K8 server. Request you to explain in details how to achieve this ?
Thanks, Anoop Singh

this will help you understand for sure
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/12984.understanding-processor-processor-time-and-process-processor-time.aspx
Understanding Processor (% Processor Time) and Process (%Processor Time)
Sanket. J Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Similar Messages

Can't get the CPU utilization above 52%

Hi all,
I have an Intel i7 950 CPU based PC with Windows 10 TP on it which, no matter what, I cannot bring to 100% CPU utilization. While taking the attached screenshot, I was running prime95.exe.
I have tested the same scenario on the same computer running Windows 8/8.1 and got the same result. However, when doing the same thing under Windows 7, CPU utilization went up to 100%.
Anybody has any idea why this happens? Is it a different default setting somewhere (probably in registry)?
Since I have this fast machine I would like to be able to use it at its full strength - the way things are now, my old Quad core 2 GHz PC is MUCH faster than this 8 core 3 GHz one (as I measured in several tests consisting of transcoding videos).
Thanks for any pointers!

Hi VikTak-9b,
How did you get the CPU utilization information ?Are you getting the information from the task manager ?
"I have tested the same scenario on the same computer running Windows 8/8.1 and got the same result. However, when doing the same thing under Windows 7, CPU utilization went up to 100%.
Anybody has any idea why this happens? Is it a different default setting somewhere (probably in registry)?"
I am a little confused here .According to my understanding ,the number is smaller the performance of the machine is higher when the other conditions are the same .
Here is a link may be useful for us to understand the CPU Utilization for Performance Analysis
Interpreting CPU Utilization for Performance Analysis
http://blogs.technet.com/b/winserverperformance/archive/2009/08/06/interpreting-cpu-utilization-for-performance-analysis.aspx
Best regards
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Determine the CPU utilization

Guys,
I've been asked to determine the CPU utilization for the execution of my procedure performing a large ETL operation. (in an unix box)
Could someone help me out?..Is there an oracle query with which I can find the detail?
Thanks guys!!!
Regards,
Bhagat

Compare CPU statistics before and after proc execution. They are measured in 10s of milliseconds.
select sn.name, ms.value
from v$sesstat ms, v$statname sn
where ms.statistic# = sn.statistic#
and upper(sn.name) like '%CPU%'
and ms.sid = [proc session SID]Regards,
Dima
Edited by: DimaCit on Sep 5, 2008 11:14 AM

How to find the CPU utilization from the portal front end

HI Guys,
I want to find the CPU utilization from the portal front end browser screen.Can you please let me know how to find this and also the path to find it.
And how to find the CPU utilization from the server.What is the command to find the CPU utilization at unix level.
Regards,
Krishnam.

hi you can create transient field in view object indicate to visibility of row (boolean ) and create view criteria that show only rows that are able to be visible according to transient attribute and at the update process set the attribute to true inside entityImpl class

No performance counter under the health service performance

Hi Everyone,
i have one system where the SCOM 2007 agent installed , but when i go to SCOM console and wants to see the performance of that from it's health service , i dont find any performance counter in Legend section.
I did re-installed the agent several time. manually and by pushing from SCOM. But everytime the result is same. I found some 20k series event log in that sever. That describes the agent is unable to communicate to RMS.
Please suggest the resolution. I need the performance of this server badly as that is a important application server in my infrastructure. And i need to generate report for this server.

Hi,
A couple of articles over the possible issue specifically for SCOM 2007:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc540431.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2007/12/12/agent-discovery-and-push-troubleshooting-in-opsmgr-2007.aspx
If SCOM Agent is not in the same domain as RMS, please, consider to watch out these as well:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/operationsmgr/archive/2009/09/10/step-by-step-for-using-certificates-to-communicate-between-agents-and-the-opsmgr-2007-server.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/operationsmgr/archive/2009/02/17/opsmgr-2007-port-requirements-for-scom-agents-in-a-dmz.aspx
Igor Savchenko, VIAcode Consulting LLC (http://www.viacode.com/)

Finding the CPU Utilization of a client.

I am doing a ptoject in grid computing.
Here one server connects to several clients simultaneously using multithreading concept.
I have to determine the CPU Usage of each of the clients connected to the server. Can anyone suggest the source code for that?

java.lang.management.ThreadMXBean has methods for getting CPU time of a thread. Exists in JDK 1.5 and upwards. May not be supported in all operating systems / JVM's, write a quick test first to see if your system supports it. Google might find examples.

If i upgrade my RAM will that be enough to improve performance even though the CPU stays the same?

I have an iMac (mid-2010) 4gb, Intel dual core i3 processor. OSX Mavericks (newest version)
I have moved almost all data to a 3TB external drive, freeing up much of the space giving me 871gb free storage on the main drive.
I am also running my libraries, back ups, & media from the external drive keeping the main free.
I am upgrading to 4x4gb to increase RAM to 16gb for the iMac.
However the CPU is still the same.
Clearly I am not very versed in understanding the hardware. I've spent the last two days learning a lot!! Everyone has been super helpful in
guiding me, and I feel I am almost there.
Just want to understand how I can get my iMac to function at its best when working in FCPX (newest version). Especially
when it comes to rendering & exporting. My workload is heavy, multiple videos at 1080i HD.
I don't know much about how to read the Activity Monitor and posting a picture. When viewing, and fcpx is running, the CPU will be
upwards of 300%!!
HELP! THANKS
ASHLEY

ashambeck wrote:
Haven't spent any money just yet. Slightly panicking because Im not a computer person, YET, but
I am learning
Im extremely surprised that a 4 year old computer is already outdated??
Yes, it is. It can be said to be almost ancient.
Note that this is not to say that your computer can't serve you. I am writing this on a 4 year old computer myself. It still works great (in fact better than when it was new, because it now has 8GB and an SSD). I can work on FCP X on it, too. I can run Mavericks and will be able to run Yosemite, too.
But I also have the chance to try a 2013 Retina MacBook Pro, and it is night and day :-)

The CPU utilization is 0% for the other remaining processes when multi threading is used

I am new to AE ,so I am trying to render a project enabling multi threading process the additional processes are present but their utilization is 0% .
I want to juice out every single CPU utiliaztion .
ANy help is greatly appriciated,.
My system specs:
AMD 9690 4.7 Ghz 8 core
32 GB DDR3
C:\256 GB Solid Satte Raid 0
GeForce 780 Ti DDR5 3GB

It is very tempting to try and use all of your system resources and multiprocessing for all your projects, but this is not the way After Effects works. Many third-party plug-ins, many codecs, and many operations do not respond well to multiprocessing. All it takes is one process in your entire thread that is not MP aware to foul the whole thing and give you longer render times.
You are also leaving zero processors for the rest of your computer. Not a wise idea.
After effects renders one frame at a time. One HD frame even with multiple layers of pixel processing just isn't that much data. It does take a while to do the calculations, but expecting to have every one of your CPUs jacked up at 100% to render a single frame of video is expecting an awful lot.
I would suggest that you read up on optimizing After Effects for your computer. Do not expect to be able to utilize 100% of your system resources at all times. That's just not the way processing video on a pixel by pixel basis works.
Just a little FYI, for 99% of my projects in After Effects I have render multiple frames simultaneously turned off. It just doesn't work with most of the things I do. Sorry for the disappointment.

Which performance counter is JVM fragmentation derrived from?

In a JRA recording there is a measure of heap fragmentation. How is that value calculated?
Or even tbetter, is there a runtime MBean which can be used to monitor the heap fragmenetation?
Regards,
Allan

I remember there has been different ways of calculating the fragmentation over the years. In JFR, I believe the fragmentation is calculated as:
total heap - free lists - actually used
In other words, memory lost to fragmentation (until we do a compaction). Internally we refer to the unavailable memory as "dark matter". There is no counter for fragmentation/dark matter available through the MBeans today. We are thinking of adding one though. ;)
Kind regards,
Marcus

Performance degrading CPU utilization 100%

Hello,
RHEL 4
Oracle 10.2.0.4
Attached to a DAS (partition is 91% full) RAID 5
Over the past few weeks my production database performance has majorly degraded. I have not made any application, OS, or database changes (I was on vacation!). I have started troubleshooting, but need some more tips as to what else I can check.
My users run a query against the database, and for a table with only 40,000 rows, it will take about 2 minutes before the results return. For a table with 12 million records, it takes about 10 minutes or more for the query to complete. If I run a script that counts/displays a total record count for each table in the database as well as a total count of all records in the database (~15,000,000 records total), the script either takes about 45 minutes to complete or sometimes it just never completes. The Linux partition on my DAS is currently 91% full. I do not have Flashback or auditing enabled.
These are some things I tried/observed:
I shut down all applications/servers/connections to the database and then restarted the database. After starting the database, I monitored the DAS interface, and the CPU utilization spiked to 100% and never goes down, even with no users/application trying to connect to the database. The alert.log file contains these errors:
ORA-00603: ORACLE server session terminated by fatal error
ORA-00600: internal error code arguments: [ttcdrv-recursivecall]
ORA-03135: connection lost contact
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.SYNCRN", line 1
The database still starts, but the performance is bad. From the error above and after checking performance in EM, I see there are a lot of sync index jobs running by each of the schemas and the db sequential file read is high. There is a job to resync the indexes every 5 minutes. I am going to try disabling these jobs tihs afternoon to see what happens with the CPU utilization. If it helps, I will try adjusting the job from running every 5 minutes to something like every 30 minutes. Is there a way to defrag the CONTEXT indexes? REBUILD?
I'm not sure if I am running down the right path or not. Does anyone have any other suggestions as to what I can check? My SGA_TARGET is currently set to 880M and the SGA_MAX_SIZE is 2032M. Would it also help for me to increase the SGA_TARGET to the SGA_MAX_SIZE; thus increasing the amount of space allocated to the buffer cache? I have ASMM enabled and currently this is what is allocated:
Shared Pool = 18.2%
Buffer Cache = 61.8%
Large Pool = 16.4%
Java Pool = 1.8%
Other = 1.8%
I also ran ADDM and these were the results of my Performance Analysis:
34.7% The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than expected (when I clicked on this it said to either implement ASM or stripe using SAME methodology...we are already using RAID5)
31% SQL statements consuming significant database time were found (I cannot make application code changes, and my database consists entirely of INSERT statements...there are never any deletes or updates. I see that the updates that are being made were by the index resyncing job to the various DR$ tables)
18% Individual database segments responsible for significant user I/O wait were found
15.9% Individual SQL statements responsible for significant user I/O wait were found
8.4% PL/SQL execution consumed significant database time
I also recently ran a SHRINK on all possible tablespace as recommended in EM, but that did not seem to help either.
Please let me know if I can provide any other pertinent information to solve the poor I/O problem. I am leaning toward thinking it has to do with the index sync job stepping on itself...the job cannot complete in 5 minutes before it tries to kick off again...but I could be completely wrong! What else can I check to figure out why I have 100% CPU utilization, with no users/applications connected? Thank you!
Mimi
Edited by: Mimi Miami on Jul 25, 2009 10:22 AM

Tables/Indexes last analyzed today.
I figured out that it was the Oracle Text indexes synching to frequently that was causing the problem. I disabled all the jobs that kicked off those indexes and my CPU utilization dropped to almost 0%. I will work on tuning the interval/re-enabling the indexes for my dynamic datasources.
Thank you for everyone's suggestions!
Mimi

High CPU utilization with JDesktopPane.OUTLINE_DRAG_MODE

Hello there,
since I updated from Java SDK 1.4.0 to 1.4.1_01 I recognized a problem with MDI Java applications using a JDesktopPane with JInternalFrames. When the drag mode of the internal frames is set to OUTLINE_DRAG_MODE, which should have a better performance than the LIVE_DRAG_MODE the cpu utilization goes nearly up to 100% an the drag of the frame is quite slow.
Does anybody else experience this problem?
(The problem exists in the application I develop and also in the IDE Netbeans, I use for development)
I am not sure if this is the right place for my problem, so if there is a better one to post it to, please tell me.
Thanks
R�diger

Hi,
I've also noticed this. It happens on Windows 2000 with 1.4.1, but not with version 1.4.0. Have you found a solution yet?
Martin

HELP: WL 8.1 run unexpectedly slow on solaris 9 with low CPU utilization

Hi All
I have setup my app to run on WL8.1 + solaris 9 env + SUN mid-end series server.
JVM was configured to use 3G RAM and there are still abundant RAM on the HW server.
I tried out a use case, it took long time to get response (~ 2 minutes). But the
CPU utilization has been always lower 20%. I have tried out the same test case
on a wintel server with 500 RAM allocated to JVM, the response time is much quicker
(less than 30 sec). I did the same on solaris 8 with 3G RAM and had used alternate
threads library mode (changing LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include /usr/lib/lwp) which
is the default mode adopted by solaris 9. The same use case responded much quicker
and comparable to abovementioned test on wintel. Can anybody advice on how to
tune WL 8.1 on solaris 9 so as to make it perform best ? Is there any special
trick ?
thank u very much for any advice in advance
dso

"Arjan Kramer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi dso,
I'm running the same two configs and run into the same performance issues
as you do. Please let me know if you any response on this!
Regards,
Arjan Kramer
"dso" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All
I have setup my app to run on WL8.1 + solaris 9 env. JVM was configured
to use
3G RAM and there are still abundant RAM on the HW server. I tried out
a use case,
it took long time to get response (~ 2 minutes). But the CPU utilization
has been
always lower 20%. I have tried out the same test case on a wintel server
with
500 RAM allocated to JVM, the response time is much quicker (less than
30 sec).
I did the same on solaris 8 with 3G RAM and had used alternate threads
library
mode (changing LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include /usr/lib/lwp) which is the
default mode
adopted by solaris 9. The same use case responded much quicker and comparable
to abovementioned test on wintel. Can anybody advice on how to tuneWL
8.1 on
solaris 9 so as to make it perform best ? Is there any special trick
thank u very much for any advice in advance
dso
There could be many factors that add to performance degradation, database, OS,
Network, app config etc, so without knowing too much its difficult to tell.
Can you please supply the startup JAVA options used to set the heap etc. Having
larger heao sizes is not always the best approach of building HA applications...the
bigger they are, the bigger they fall. I'd suggest using many but smaller instances.
Provide the heap info from NT also.
BTW, when weblogic starts, can you tell me how much memory is being used in the
console...ie the footprint of weblogic + your application.
Many Thanks

CPU utilization problem with JSF

Hi,
I am using MyFaces 1.1.4 and tomahawk 1.1.3.
I am using EJB 2.0 and weblogic server 9.2
I have a problem with the performance of my application. The response time for 500 concurrent users is arnd 10sec. However, the CPU utilization normally hits *95-97%.*
I have disabled all the logging to reduce the file IO. Also, all the code has been optimised. Still the problem exists. Now, I cannot think of any way to overcome this. My project is getting delayed because of this.
Request you all to pls help.
Regards,
Milan.

What type of server or servers are you using. I am assuming which I hate to do is that your EJB's are for CRUD and you a connection pool. Have tried to optimize the DB connection pool's ?.

EEM applet that triggers on high CPU utilization

Hi Folks,
I am trying to create an eem applet which triggers on high cpu utilization (detected by erm).   The applet should then tftp the output from "show proc cpu sorted" to a tftp server.
I am trying to configure this on a 1841 running 124-24.T3 code
This is my config:
resource policy
policy HighGlobalCPU global
   system
    cpu total
     critical rising 5 falling 2 interval 10
    cpu process
     critical rising 5 falling 2 interval 10
! I'm not sure whether it is correct to monitor 'cpu total' or 'cpu process'.   The rising thresholds are deliberately low to maker testing easier
event manager applet ReportHighCPU
event resource policy "HighGlobalCPU"
action 1.0 cli command "show process cpu sorted 5sec | redirect tftp://192.168.1.1/highCPU$_resource_time_sent.txt"
action 2.0 syslog priority debugging msg "high cpu event detected, output tftp sent"
The problem is that I can't seem to trigger the applet.    I have generated enough traffic to push the cpu utilization to over 30% (according to 'show proc cpu'), but the applet does not appear to trigger (no syslog messages appear, and my syslog server does not receive anything).
If anyone can tell me what I've done wrong here I would be very grateful!
Thanks,
Darragh

I am just replying off the top of my head but I believe you
need to also add to your conf the line
user global HighGlobalCPU

High CPU utilization with SQL Server 2005

Our company recently combined our DBs into one SQL 2005 Server.
Dell Power Edge 1800 with 3.00 GHz Xeon Processor 800 FSB, 1 GB of RAM
Dell Power Edge 1600 with 2.80 GHz Xeon Processor 533 FSB, 1 GB of RAM
Combined into one:
Dell Power Edge 2950 Dual Core 1.6 GHz Xeon Woodcrest Processor, 4 GB of RAM
However, the CPU utilization on this new server is maintaining at about 90% with 3.82 GB of RAM used as well. It's a Windows Server 2003 R2 x64 edition running SQL Server 2005 SP2 x64. I have searched around Microsoft's website for any information that could be of help to me, but I was unable to locate anything. I was hoping that someone could provide some insight as to why this might be occuring. Or if this is a known issue.
Thanks,
Peter

Hello!
Here are some steps to take after upgrading your SQL Server from 2K to 2K5. (This quote is from BOL)
After upgrading the Database Engine to SQL Server 2005, complete the following tasks:
Register your servers - Upgrade removes registry settings for the previous SQL Server instance. After upgrading, you must reregister your servers.
Repopulate full-text catalogs - The upgrade process marks your databases as full-text disabled. Catalogs must be repopulated, but this operation is not run automatically by Setup because it can be time-consuming. As this operation enhances the performance of your SQL Server 2005 installation, administrators should plan to repopulate full-text catalogs at a convenient time.
Update statistics - To help optimize query performance, we recommend that you update statistics on all databases following upgrade. Use the sp_updatestats stored procedure to update statistics in user-defined tables in SQL Server 2005 databases.
Update usage counters - In earlier versions of SQL Server, the values for the table and index row counts and page counts can become incorrect. To correct any invalid row or page counts, we recommend that you run DBCC UPDATEUSAGE on all databases following upgrade.
Configure your new SQL Server installation - To reduce the attackable surface area of a system, SQL Server 2005 selectively installs and activates key services and features. For more information on how to activate SQL Server 2005 features, see SQL Server Surface Area Configuration.
Source:
How to: Upgrade to SQL Server 2005 (Setup)
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144267.aspx

Which Performance Counter tells the CPU Utilization

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for