Which RAM is better?

I got two sets of RAM:
CMX512-3200XL-and-CMX512-3200C2.....Which one would be good for overclocking?

Try reposting here if you haven't already:
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?boardid=27&sid=

Similar Messages

Which Ram is better to go with?

Hi,
I was just wondering which Ram was better for my 2.2ghz intel core 2 duo 13 inch macbook which currently has 1 gb of ram.
http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=435044 8&csid=ITD&body=MAIN
OR
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/53C4DDR2P4GB/
I am from Canada so the top sit is also Canadian!
THANKS!

HI,
Try Crucial
See MacBook memory specs here.
Carolyn

Which configuration is better: higher GHz and lower RAM or lower GHz and higher RAM?

I want to buy a new iMac. If all other factors are the same, including price, which configuration is better?
21.5" iMac (late 2012) $1699
3.1GHz Intel Core i7 Quad-Core
8GB of 1600Hz DDR3 RAM
--vs--
21.5" iMac (late 2012) $1699
2.9GHz Intel Core i5 Quad-Core
16GB of 1600Hz DDR3 RAM

A faster CPU gets the work done faster.
More RAM deals better with large chunks of work (= large files) and multitasking (more apps open simultaneously).
Fusion Drive is a an acceptable compromise to get the speed of SSDs and the affordable space of HDDs for as long as SSDs in the total target size are so astronomically expensive.

Which is a better performer, the macbook air or the mac mini?

Which one performs better, the late 2013 macbook air (standard configuration: 4GB RAM, dual core i5 1,3 Ghz CPU) or the mac mini core quad core i7, 4GB RAM with a regular hard disc?

LowLuster
No Air model can be as fast as a Mini with a quad core i7 CPU. Can't happen.
I didnt solicit your opinion, and it IS a fact, .....skilled users here on this board will and DO TELL other users OFTEN that:
"outside of processor core use (video/ photo etc.) you will NOT NOTICE ANY DIFFERENCE on X computer vs. slower Y computer"
I have a 8 month old QUAD core Mac Mini and it is , as I said above "noticeably not ONE BIT" faster than my current 2013 macbook Air with 8gig.
My quad core came with 4gig of RAM as I recall, I immediately tossed in 16gig.
Notice the word "noticeably"
Your subjective hyperbole aside, you are wrong......., those above yourself and myself (point wise,...as Ogel has stated, Clinton has stated, and others) state this fact very often regarding ---"outside of processor core use (video/ photo etc.) you will NOT NOTICE ANY DIFFERENCE on X computer vs. slower Y computer"
Its not my opinion, its a fact, namely additionally that I stated "noticeably" - "my quad core mac mini on MOST EVERYTHING (which is most things since 'most things' are NOT photo and video editing) is not "noticeably" ONE BIT faster than my Macbook Air.
"most things" people do (most people) on their computer does NOT involve photo and video editing (photoshop pro, final cut pro etc etc)
This is a fact, that AS SUCH most people WILL NOT notice any difference in general computer use between a quad core mac mini (for example) and a entry level macbook Air. (SSD vs. HD speeds aside). Nobody is going to notice faster youtube, or Word use, or websurfing, Acrobat Pro, Quicktime play, general APPS that havent changed much in 7 years.
Dont curse on these family boards please, its uncouth.
Peace

Which Laptop is better? HP DV7-4177NR OR DV7-6B55DX?

Okay I need to buy a new laptop ASAP! Can you guys help me and tell me which one is better?
Both laptops are refurbished.
DV7 4177NR :http://www.ebay.com/itm/HP-PAVILION-DV7-4177NR-AMD-PHENOM-II-DUAL-CORE-N640-2-9GHZ-/170872977978?pt=...
DV7-6B55DX :http://www.cowboom.com/product/1033798
Okay well both laptops seem good to me but which one is better?
The 4177NR features a AMD Phenom II Dual Core N640 @2.9GHZ
6GB DDR3 RAM
640GB HD
BluRay
17.3 INCH Screen
Graphic :ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Sound :Beats Audio and HP Triple Bass Reflex Subwoofer
The 6B55DX offers
2nd gen intel core i5 -2430 M processor 2.40GHZ with turbo boost to 3 GHZ
8GB Ram
Intel HD graphics 3000
Beats Audio
etc.
So which one is better for games? Which one has less problems and wont cause me to spend lots of money to fix in the future?
I can get the 4177nr for 475 with 10 bucks cash back
and i can get the other one for around 520.

The Intel laptops is probably a better choice. That Radeon HD 5470 is not much powerful and the integrated Intel chip will be better as it uses the advantage of the Sandy Bridge Core i5 processor. However, there are better machines for games than these ones..
Dv6-7000 /Full HD/Core i5-3360M/GF 650M/Corsair 8GB/Intel 7260AC/Samsung Pro 256GB
Testing - HP 15-p000
HP Touchpad provided by HP
Currently on Debian Wheeze
*Please, help other users with the same issue by marking your solved topics as "Accept as Solution"*

I am going to buy a macbook pro for grade 12, and I need to know wheather I should get a macbook pro or a macbook pro retina. If someone could tell me (in a very simple way) which one is,better for me and why, I would be ever so apprreciative.

I am going to buy a macbook pro for grade 12, and I need to know wheather I should get a macbook pro or a macbook pro retina. If someone could tell me (in a very simple way) which one is,better for me and why, I would be ever so apprreciative.

Why do you need a expensive MacBook Pro?
Your attending high school and unless everyone else is rich also your likely going to be a target by the more poorer students for theft or damage to the machine.
You could keep it home, but if you need it for class then your exposed again.
Also at that age your not very careful yet, a MacBook Pro is a expensive and easily damaged machine.
Unless your made of money and so are others at your school, I would recommned a low profile, just does the job cheap Windows PC.
If it dies, gets lost, stolen or damaged because of your inexperince handling senstivie electronics then it's no big deal.
You can buy a Mac later on when your sure you have a need for it, currently there isn't much advantage of owning a Mac compared to a PC, they do just about the same things now, one just looks prettier than the other.
Since 95% of the world uses Windows PC's your going to have to install Windows on the Mac in order to keep your skills up there or be unemployed, so it's a extra headache and expense.
good luck

Which browser is better to use as an option to Safari and how do you download it?

Which browser is better to use as an option to Safari and how do you safely download it? Thanks

I use Firefox when a site doesn't work well with Safari. Some people like Google's Chrome, but I find it too instrusive and do not trust Google's security. You can download Firefox from firefox.com.
Regards.

I am looking for macbookpro mid 2010 HDD exact specs so that i can upgrade it to 1TB. PLEASE HELP ME about OEM apple brand or which one is better.Thanks

I am looking for macbookpro mid 2010 HDD exact specs so that i can upgrade it to 1TB. PLEASE HELP ME about OEM apple brand or which one is better?.Thanks

clintonfrombirmingham Your information is not correct.
http://kb.sandisk.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/8142/~/difference-between-sata-i,- sata-ii-and-sata-iii
I have a sata II samsung 5400 rpm and i am only able to transfer at 85 read right speed.
On my main drive sata III ocz agility 3 ssd i get 120 mb read and 180 write.
Neither of these come close to the 300 mb promised. So it wont matter if he got sata II or III
The speed came from Blackmagic Disk Speed Test

Which solution for better perfomance?

I'm writing java application based on XML. This application have to store very large XML file into DB (XML file is about 1000MB large). My solution is to divide it into smaller (100MB) parts (because of memory resources) and store it in DB. I have one XMLType table based on object-relational storage (so at the end there will be 10 rows each of 100MB size).
XML file looks like:
<students>
<student id="1">
...// 5 nested elements or collections of elements
</student>
<student id="2">
</student>
<student id="3">
</student>
</students>
</students>
Now I need to get java object Student which correponds to <student>element. My solution is to select whole <student> element and use JAXB to convert it to Java object. While solving a problem with selecting <student> element (just in case you know a solution for my another problem: How to select specific element from a XML document using JDBC? another question raised in my mind.
Which solution has better performance when I don't need to select relational data but I'm interested in xml fragment?
1) Use object-relational storage
2) Use CLOB storage
As I figured out object-relational storage is better for selecting data like student name. But is it also better when I need whole xml fragment?
Isn't my solution completely wrong? I'm quite a newbie in XML DB so it's possible that I missed better solution.
Thanks for any advice

I don't know which version you have regarding 11g, but probably in this case I would go for a table with a XMLType Binary XML column. To make xpath and other statements perform use Structured or Unstructured XMLIndexes to support your queries. The following has worked for far smaller XML documents but the millions we used were good for a total of >> 1 TB total storage size...
CREATE TABLE XMLTEST_DATA
(    "ID" NUMBER(15,0),
      "DOC" "SYS"."XMLTYPE"
) SEGMENT CREATION IMMEDIATE
NOCOMPRESS NOLOGGING
TABLESPACE "XML_DATA"
XMLTYPE COLUMN "DOC" STORE AS SECUREFILE BINARY XML
(TABLESPACE "XML_DATA"
NOCOMPRESS KEEP_DUPLICATES)
-- XMLSCHEMA "http://www.XMLTEST.com/Schema1.0.xsd"
-- ELEMENT "RECORD"
DISALLOW NONSCHEMA
PARTITION BY RANGE(id)
(PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_01 VALUES LESS THAN (100000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_02 VALUES LESS THAN (200000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_03 VALUES LESS THAN (300000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_04 VALUES LESS THAN (400000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_05 VALUES LESS THAN (500000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_06 VALUES LESS THAN (600000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_07 VALUES LESS THAN (700000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_08 VALUES LESS THAN (800000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_09 VALUES LESS THAN (900000000) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
,PARTITION XMLTEST_DATA_PART_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE) TABLESPACE "XML_DATA" NOCOMPRESS
CREATE INDEX test_xmlindex on XMLTEST_data (doc) indextype is xdb.xmlindex
LOCAL
parameters ('GROUP PARENTINFO_GROUP
             XMLTable test_cnt_tab_ParentInfo
            ''/RECORD/ParentInfo''
            COLUMNS
             GroupingID01 VARCHAR2(4000) PATH ''Parent/GroupingID'',
             GroupingID02 VARCHAR2(4000) PATH ''Parent/Parent/GroupingID''
          ');

I would like to buy am Ipad for my nephew. Which one is better to play games, ipad or ipad mini

I would like to buy an ipad for my nephew. Which one is better, ipad or ipad mini? He wants to play games, and put lots of app.

Probably the full iPad, because it has a better graphics card. The larger screen helps too.

Which is a better bacikup software?

I'm puzzled as to which is a better backup software:
Carbon Copy Cloner or
Super Duper which says it preserves data that would be lost during something called a roll back.
I don't what that means;
I am backing up to a firewire external drive, is that a good choice?
Need advice
Thanks

I read in SuperDuper that it completely erases your drive and makes a duplicate of the HD. There are documents that I remove from my HD but would like to keep on the backup disc just in case. I may need them in the future. According to SuperDuper they would be erased because they no longer reside on the main HD. I'm looking to update new and changed items but not delete items that no longer reside on the main HD, am I making myself clear?
Yes, the free version of SuperDuper! will always erase the target drive and clone the entire source disk again. The paid version will do what you want. What I have in quotes below is directly from the registered version's menus.
1) Smart Update. "Smart Update will copy and erase what's needed to make the target drive identical to your selections from the source. The result will mimic "Erase, then copy", but will typically take a fraction of the time."
2) Copy newer files. "Any selected files already on the target drive that are older than the equivalent file on the source will be replaced. New files will also be copied; no files will be removed."
3) Copy different files. "Any selected files already on the target drive that are different (in date, size or attributes), than the same file on the source will be replaced. New files will also be copied; no files will be removed."

c:redirect VS RequestDispatcher -WHICH ONE IS BETTER TO USE?

WHENVER WE WANT TO ACCESS FILES FROM OHTER APPLICATIONS,WHICH ONE IS BETTER TO USE,<c:redirect> OR
RequestDispatcher

Please stop shouting. It is considered rude.

, c:redirect OR RequestDispatcher -which one is better to use

WHENVER WE WANT TO ACCESS FILES FROM OHTER APPLICATIONS,WHICH ONE IS BETTER TO USE,<c:redirect> OR
RequestDispatcher

<c:redirect> is the JSTL equivalent of the sendRedirect() method of javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse.
Please see here:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=45&threadID=405398 or search the forums for "RequestDispatcher redirect"

Which cover is better whether smart cover or smart case

which cover is better whether smart cover or smart case

It is really a choice to personal preference.
The Smart Cover provides some protection for the front of the device but no side/back protected. However, the Smart Cover is much more easier to use in my opinion and makes the device feel better.
The Smart Case provides all around protection for your iPad and is worth getting. It is not as tough as some of the crazy cases out their that like protect from 100ft drops lol.
So, just go to the Apple store and talk to a representative and he/she will help you out!
- Sean

Which one is better static inner classes or inheritance ?

Hi,
Consider following scenario,
Class A does some database related work and Class B,C,D has more specific tasks for specific databases. For now B,C,D has more static information like driver name etc.
1. I can either make class B,C,D as static inner classes OR
2. classes B,C,D can extend class A.
Case 1. makes it more flexible, if in future, B,C,D needs more than static methods.
Case 2. can avoid complexity and cost of instantiating differnt objects based on differnt scenarios.
Which approache is better in both ?
Thanks

Yes, I have seen abstract factory pattern , rather I have implemeted it at one place and in case 1. using abstract factory pattern is the way to initialize all classes.But my question is if I make all subclasses as a static inner classes, will it be better or efficient approach as compare to abstract factory pattern.Because Abstract factory patter adds more complications in code in turn it provides more flexibility.

Which RAM is better?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for