Which rfc destination i has to use

hi
i m trying to connect internal network ftp server by using
<b>ftp_connect</b> functional module for that which RFC destination i has to use
thanks in advanced.

your basis person is the right guy to give you the RFC destination

Similar Messages

How to find out, which RFC-Destinations are in use?

Hi community
We have a huge list of RFC-Destinations in our productive system and I want to delete unneeded entries.
Is there a report or a log, which shows, which RFC-Destinations were used, and when?
Thanks in advance.
Regards, Michael

HI
can you see the default trace in tcode SMGW, Be careful about deleting any system rfc.
Read the documentation about default RFC, internal RFC, LDAP_RFC, transport RFC.
I don't know other way to do that you need
Regards
William Neira

Which RFC destination is missing?

On MEREP_SBUILDER, I try to do a "BAPI Wrapper interface checks" for a SyncBO.
I get the error: RFC communication failure: Error when opening an RFC connection".
I look into SM59 and see a lot of RFC (type=3) defined.
So which is missing?
Thanks!

Hi Jennifer,
go to MEREP_PD and open the last tab (SYNCHRONIZER). The table shows you all SyncBOs in the systen and its stae. Well, the RFC is written down there for each SyncBO in column RFC DESTINATION. And this is the one that you need to check. So open SM59 -> ABAP Connectors and you should find the one that was mentioned in MEREP_PD. Open it and do a Connection Test as well as a remote logon.
But: you can ask the BASIS people in your company to suppor tyou there as well - if you tell them the name of the RFC, they are able to find out if it is really a problem there and how to fix it.
Hope that helps!
Regards,
Oliver

Which version of JDeveloper has been used

hi
If one would stumble upon some source files of an ADF application for which there is not much context available (like e.g. in the forum thread "SelectBooleanCheckBox/SelectBooleanRadio and getTransaction().isDirty()") ...
... (q1) How can be determined which exact version of JDeveloper has been used to create (or work on) the ADF application?
many thanks
Jan Vervecken

Thanks for the replies John and Timo.
John Stegeman wrote:
It's not as easy as it would seem.Hence the question.
... but even the metadata in there doesn't necessarily give you an exact answer.To avoid confusion, only an exact answer would seem to make sense.
Timo Hahn wrote:
... check the version properties of the meta data files ... The highest number which is used points to the jdev version used to build the file. ...It seems rather inconvenient to have to check each and every meta-data file to determine the (exact/preferred) version of JDeveloper to work on the ADF application.
I wonder what the Oracle intended/preferred approach is to determined the version of JDeveloper to use, based on the ADF application source files alone, answering (q1).
(Also when extension are taken into account, see for example the somewhat related questions in forum thread "use the same extensions for all developers".)
(This delayed reply was caused by the many "currently experiencing network connectivity errors" responses I got from the OTN forum, especially after login.)
regards
Jan

Which RFC module/s should I use to access DSO tables?

Hello,
I am in a proccess of creating an adaptive RFC model in Web Dynpro.
I am in a stage where I need to select my RFC modules.
My requirement is to access our DSO tbles.
I see many BAPI's and functions under the SAP Business Information Warehous tree. Which one should I use for needs?
Roy

Hi Roy,
You should use BI SDK for Java to connect to BW from Web Dynpro (https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/documents/a1-8-4/how%20to%20use%20the%20bi%20java%20sdk%20in%20a%20web%20dynpro%20application.pdf)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6e/011e681cf74ab4b3acf73f77653405/frameset.htm
https://media.sdn.sap.com/public/html/submitted_docs/BW/BI_SDK_JavaDocs/bi_sdk_doc/docs/documentation.html
/people/moya.watson/blog/2004/04/05/the-bi-java-sdk-whats-in-it-for-you
/people/moya.watson/blog/2004/12/27/three-new-how-to-guides-for-the-bi-java-sdk
Best regards, Maksim Rashchynski.

Which RFC module/s should I use to access BW tables?

Hello,
I am in a proccess of creating an adaptive RFC model in Web Dynpro.
I am in a stage where I need to select my RFC modules.
My requirement is to access our BW tables.
I see many BAPI's and functions under the SAP Business Information Warehous tree. Which one should I use for needs?
Roy

Hi Roy,
You should use BI SDK for Java to connect to BW from Web Dynpro (https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/documents/a1-8-4/how%20to%20use%20the%20bi%20java%20sdk%20in%20a%20web%20dynpro%20application.pdf)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6e/011e681cf74ab4b3acf73f77653405/frameset.htm
https://media.sdn.sap.com/public/html/submitted_docs/BW/BI_SDK_JavaDocs/bi_sdk_doc/docs/documentation.html
/people/moya.watson/blog/2004/04/05/the-bi-java-sdk-whats-in-it-for-you
/people/moya.watson/blog/2004/12/27/three-new-how-to-guides-for-the-bi-java-sdk
Best regards, Maksim Rashchynski.

Logs of used rfc destinations

Hi Guys,
i'm looking for some tables including log-information of used rfc destinations. For now i have table EDIDC for IDoc-Logs. Do you know more tables, e.g. regarding BAPI usage? RFC logs in general (here i found ARFCSSTATE/ARFCRSTATE and some others, but they don't look as they would log all records, do they?
i just want to find out which rfc destinations are used and which not!
Best Regards
Stefan

Hi Stefan,
Generally we will RFC logs from SM58.
(Or) Check tcode SLG1 for application Log.
Thanks,
Krishna.

How to create RFC Destination without using SM59?

Hello all:
We are troubleshooting an issue. An user created a RFC destination. He claims that he did not use SM59. We checked his access and do not have SM59 in his roles.
He configured VIRSA FireFighter. During the configuration, he created RFC destination. Document says use SM59 or contact BASIS Admin. He claims that he used a config table and he don't remember the config table name. RFC screen shows his ID as creator of the RFC.
We are trying to understand how an RFC can be created (outside of SM59) and plug the security hole in the environment.
Any insights would be appreciated.
--Anand

The FireFighter solution changes the RFC destination of the service user "on the fly" without S_TCODE checks for 'SM59'. But if I can remember correctly when looking into this, it does not create the RFC destination (in SM59) "on the fly".
> He claims that he used a config table and he don't remember the config table name.
Theoretically this is possible - a config table to define the name of the destination, and then create it if it does not exist yet (when used).
Otherwise, see SAP note 587410 and restrict (remove) his authority for the test environment (concentrate on S_DEVELOP, not S_TCODE - as you have also experienced).
Cheers,
Julius

Best practice for creating RFC destination entries for 3rd parties(Biztalk)

Hi,
We are on SAP ECC 6 and we have been creating multiple RFC destination entries for the external 3rd party applications such as Biz-talk and others using TCP/IP connection type and sharing the programid.
The RFC connections with IDOC as data flow have been made using Synchronous mode for time critical ones(few) and majority through asynchronous mode for others. The RFC destination entries have been created for many interfaces which have unique RFC destinations with its corresponding ports defined in SAP.
We have both inbound and outbound connectivity.with the large number of RFC destinations being added we wanted to review the same. We wanted to check with others who had encountered similar situation and were keen to learn their experiences.
We also wanted to know if there are any best practices to optimise on number of RFC destinations.
Here were a few suggestions we had in mind to tackle the same.
1. Create unique RFC destinations for every port defined in SAP for external applications as Biztalk for as many connections. ( This would mean one for inbound, one for outbound)
2. Create one single RFC destination entry for the external host/application and the external application receiving the idoc control record to interpret what action to perform at its end.
3. Create RFC destinations based on the modules it links with such as materials management, sales and distribution, warehouse management. This would ensure we can limit the number of RFC to be created and make it simple to understand the flow of data.
I have done checks on SAP best practices website, sap oss notes and help pages but could not get specific information I was after.
I do understand we can have as unlimited number of RFC destinations and maximum connections using appropriate profile parameters for gateway, RFC, client connections, additional app servers.
I would appreciate if you can suggest the best architecture or practice to achieve RFC destinations in an optimized manner.
Thanks in advance
Sam

Not easy to give a perfect answer
1. Create unique RFC destinations for every port defined in SAP for external applications as Biztalk for as many connections. ( This would mean one for inbound, one for outbound)
-> be careful if you have multi cllients ( for example in acceptance) RFC's are client independ but ports are not! you could run in to trouble
2. Create one single RFC destination entry for the external host/application and the external application receiving the idoc control record to interpret what action to perform at its end.
-> could be the best solution... its easier to create partner profiles and the control record will contain the correct partner.
3. Create RFC destinations based on the modules it links with such as materials management, sales and distribution, warehouse management. This would ensure we can limit the number of RFC to be created and make it simple to understand the flow of data.
-> consider this option 2.
We send to you messagebroker with 1 RFC destination , sending multiple idoctypes, different partners , different ports.

RFC destination for your third-party tool

Hello SAP Guru's,
I have recently established external db connect for an iseries database. Now developers wants to use the open hub destination to extract data to non-SAP systems. They are using API: RSB_API_OHS_3RDPARTY_NOTIFY to connect a third-party tool to the BI system and use this third-party tool to distribute data to other non-SAP systems. To do so they need RFC destination for the third party tool. Could you tell me which RFC connection i have to use in SM59 ? I mean is it ABAP connection or TCP/IP connection or HTTP connection to external server?
I would highly appreciate any help on this.
FYI:
I have already gone through below help link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/8de3f4743b22a8e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm

This will be of type TCP/IP.
You will need to create an RFC server application on the thirdparty system, and implement this function there. You will need to define that server application in your RFC destination definitions (host/Program).
You may need to read up RFC server help documentation; you can also browse the SAPGUI subfolders for RFC server sample applications and C code (if you have installed GUI in full, there should be such subfolders on your PC). You can also ask for help on 'application server' or 'abap' forums for this.

Getting problem when creating RFC Destination on XI system

hi,
I m trying to create RFC Destination on XI system using sm59 tcode. In technical setting tab at Target Host field, i gave SAP ECC server IP address. and in Logon Tab I gave Login parameters for SAP ECC server (Client 400, User : 05 & Password for user 05). Current user and Unencrypted Password fields are unchecked. also Logon Scree is also unchecked in Security Option.
Problem is, when i click on Remote logon tab, It shows me Logon screen with client 000, User : 04 (which is XI system's user name) and Password. so it doesn't take given login setting for ECC system and if i tried this thing more than 3 times, ECC server block my pwd.
Please suggest me the required solution
Thanks & Regards
Ritesh

Hi ritesh
First check if the user exists in ths system. Check the password especially. Because the password space (Number of characters)in SM59 screen is more than password character in SU01 screen.Check the password.
Secondly, Check if you have given the proper client in the destination box of SM59.
Check for the unicode test also.
If possible change the user type as service user.
When everything is perfect am sure the rfc connection should be fine...

Help reg RFC Destination

Hi Folks,
I have send send IDoc from XI system to R3 system. For this I am creating RFC Destination in XI system using txn SM59. Also the name of RFC Destination in XI is same as Logical System Name in R3 system for that client.
After creating RFC Destination I did 'Test Connection' , which was successful. But on doing 'Remote Logon' it in neither giving any error nor opening Remote Session.
Can anybody tell me why remote session is not opening?
Thanks in Advance.
Swamy

Hi swamy,
if it does not open the remote session the reason is that the user you are using is a non dialog (correct) user so it cannot logon in dialog mode but is used for communications.
To check if the logon parameters (user/pwd) are correct use from the menu of SM59 test->authorization.
Regards,
Sergio

RFC destinations for CUA - clarification required.

Greetings, Gurus!
I'm in the planning-going-testing phase of CUA implementation for our landscape, and it appears I've run into something of a snag.
According to everything I've read, including various SAPnotes and documentation available in SAP Library, I understand that it is not possible to configure the CUA to use specific RFC destinations. Instead, CUA will attempt to use an RFC destination that has the same name as the logical system it is calling. I.e. central system ADMCLNT070 is making an RFC call in context of CUA to PRDCLNT510, for this purpose, RFC destination named PRDCLNT510 will be used.
Q1: Have I understood this correctly?
Q2: Is there any way to specify an RFC destination I want to use?
Thanks for your time!

would like yiu to go through the below link too,
As the complication of using diffrent name and etc has been mentioned, and fixing has been hit and trial method for me when i did it..
logical system name vs. destination name - CUA -
Thanks,
Prasant K paichha
Edited by: Prasant K Paichha on Mar 5, 2010 12:52 PM

How to send data to RFC Destination(RFC SENDER Adapter)

Hi ,
Scenario: R/3 Backendà RFC Sender Adapterà XIàsome other system.
I have configured the RFC destination (of the type TCP/IP) at R/3 System and have registered the Program ID (specified in the RFC destination) in the XI server and using it in the configuration parameters of the RFC Sender Adapter.
Problem: I do not know how I can send data to the RFC destination. (Should I use a report program/ ABAP Function Module?) Can anybody provide me with a sample code of Report Program/Function module (whichever is required), how to send data to the RFC Destination, so that it may be picked up by my RFC Sender Adapter.
Thanks and Regards,
Siva Maranani

I have one query for you that
I am trying to develop a scenario in SAP XI
SAP R/3 ( RFC function module) sends a synchronous request to the XI and SAP XI will send this request to a third party web application using HTTP receiver adapter.
I am able to send the data/message and it is successfully received at the third party web application.
But I am facing one issue that I am unable to receive any message/data in my RFC module back.i have seen in sxmb_moni that the two messages are displayed in successfuly processed but in SAP R/3 side nothing get happedned
Can you tell me how to use some waiting mechanism in function module to wait for the response from SAP XI.
Regards
Gopesh

Multiple RFC Destinations

Hi
I have 75+ idoc interfaces. some are high priority interfaces and some are low priority interfaces.
We did queue prioritization for those interfaces too....But we have only one RFC destination for
all the interfaces.
We are thinking to go for one more RFC destination(SM59), so that we can route low priority high volume
load through this. This way high priority messages can't be effected.
Is this the right approach of implementing ?
thanks
kumar

>If it is outbound idoc (ECC-xi-third party), then workprocesses of ECC will be consumed right ? and not XI ? Plz correct me if I am wrong.
Both WP will be used on ECC and XI
>If we have only one RFC destination:
>
>1. out of 75+ interfaces, e.g if one high volume-low priority interface triggers 10k idocs and after
>that if high priority interace get triggers, then first high volume-low priority messages will be piled up
>in RFC destination and after they get processed then only high priority messages will ger process.
>If We have 2 RFC destination:
>
>2. we can route high volume-low priority interface into one RFC destination and high priority interface
>into another RFC destination. This way high priority interfaces won't be effected
If both RFC destinations point to the same logon group, WP's to be consumed will be taken from the same "pool" so I see no benefit in separating RFC destinations, it's the same of using a single RFC destination.
If you use different logon group then it's different, because you can assing more resources to a logon group than to another (this means different number of WPs) and at the end different priority.
Regards,
Sergio

Which rfc destination i has to use

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for