Which sources of supply allow scales in their conditions?

I want to maintain quantity related scales in contract and scheduling agreement . is this possible ? how ?
i know info record allows scales ?
is there any place where can maintain scale related conditions in purchase order ?

In Contract and Scheling agreement you can also create scales
Go to Condition tab in ME31k, ME31L
You can do scales for a particular condition type through condition record maintainance; go to transaction code MEK1, chose the combination for which you want to maintain condition record and scale.

Similar Messages

Source of Supply in PR

Hi Xperts,
I have a PR created through MRP, but when i display it the source of supply does not come automatically, the source list is existed with fixed vendor indicator checked, MRP indicator 1 is set.
Please help to know is there anything that i missed..
Thanks in advance

Fix Indicator specifies that which source of supply is the preferred /fix within the specified period. if you have multiple source of supply and you want to preferred any one of them then it will work.
it for you information with ticked mrp considered the source.
please check following things.
1. check the material for procurement type, special procurement & quota arrangement in MRP views..
2. also check the info record because in case of subcontracting it will considered
3. validity of source list.

I have had IPhones since their inception. Last phone was the 5. A few months ago, I upgraded to the 6 Plus. Here is my issue. On my 5, my car radio (which has USB port) allowed me to plug in and listen to radio or music from my phone and the bonus

I have had IPhones since their inception. Last phone was the 5. A few months ago, I upgraded to the 6 Plus.
Here is my issue.
On my 5, my car radio (which has USB port) allowed me to plug in and listen to radio or music from my phone and the bonus was it charged the phone as well. All worked great.
Now with the 6 Plus, neither of things work. The message on the radio (Kenwood) says I Pod error. The message on my phone say's "this device is supported".
I have called on this before and was told you are aware and that the issue will be addressed in a future update. There have been several updates on IOS 8 and the issue remains.

I have a Kenwood KDC-X695. When I purchased this stereo and had it installed, I had an ATT iPhone 4.
It worked with the stereo, but had a few issues. I had purchased a few audio books that I would listen to while driving. When I plugged it in it would immediately begin to play the book from the beginning or if I had been listening to music, it would start playing the song that was at the top of the song list.
The stereo came equipped with Firmware version 3.05. I upgraded to the iPhone 5 a year later. I had that phone for approximately 2 years. The song or book issue remained the same.
I just recently upgraded to the iPhone 6 and the Bluetooth function still works, however the USB port on the stereo that the phone plugs into to allow files on the phone to play through the stereo no longer works.
I contacted the service provider (Verizon) and after speaking to several different technical support technicians, they provided me the phone numbers for Kenwood and Apple because they were unable to help me.
I spoke with Kenwood technical support the following day and after a few fumbling miscues from the technical advisor, it was suggested that I upgrade the firmware, even though the Kenwood literature warns against this if the Bluetooth portion is working, because if there is a problem with the upgrade, it can render the Bluetooth useless and non-functional. The advisor did suggest the latest firmware on the second or third attempt, after I pointed out what I was able to glean from my initial search.
Later that day, I went back to the Kenwood site (from their homepage) and by using their selection tools, discovered that this particular model was only ever intended to be used with the iPhone 4S (the technical advisor was not aware of this, even though I mentioned this during my phone call earlier in the day). According to the Firmware selection tool, my iPhone 5 should not have worked with it.
I performed the Firmware upgrade, and it took 13 minutes. This was less than the 15 minutes that was forecast in the Kenwood literature. The Bluetooth still works but the USB cable connection still causes the unsupported device message that I received prior to the upgrade. I am incredibly annoyed and disappointed.
By upgrading to the iPhone 6, I have three choices; (1) only use the Bluetooth for phone calls without the ability to play other files from my iPhone 6 (2) forced obsolescence of my stereo, requires buying a new stereo (3) return my iPhone 6 and go back to my iPhone 5.
I do not believe that I should have to be a software/Firmware/hardware engineer, vetting every single device that I own; prior to upgrading a cell phone.
I am incredibly annoyed with Apple at the moment.
I have a separate Bluetooth headset that worked with both my iPhone 4 and iPhone 5 that the iPhone 6 simply does not recognize. That is another story for another time.
Currently, I am incredibly underwhelmed with Apple.

Extreq Transfer with source of supply assigned

Dear all,
We are on SRM 7.0 PDP scenario.
Purchase Requisitions with Contracts assigned are being transferred to SRM. We expect these purchase requisitions with an assigned source of supply not to be transferred to SRM.
How can be solved?
Thanks
Ezequiel

Hi Eze
What error comes into slg1
so how you are correcting your Purchase request?
As manoj said is that PR is refering inforecord?
Symptom
You have a purchase requisition which is created from MRP. This purchase requisition has an info record and is already transferred to the SRM system. If we change the purchase requisition quantity later on, an error message "procurement profile cannot be changed" is raised and hence the changed PR cannot be transferred to SRM.
However, you would like to allow the purchase requisition change even if an info record is present.
Other terms
BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER 6Q204 6Q 204 Material Requirement Planning
Reason and Prerequisites
This is a special functionality implemented for the customer.
Solution
Implement the attached correction instructions to enable this functionality.
===
Note 1318245 - Changing the purchasing group for unreleased PReqs
Symptom
In ERP, you attempt to change the purchasing group of a purchase requisition in transaction ME52N. To do this, you enter a new value and confirm this by choosing "Enter". Under certain circumstances, this causes the system to issue an error message informing you that you cannot change the eprofile. When you confirm this error message, the purchasing group adopts its previous value again.
Reason and Prerequisites
The following prerequisites for this are known:
1) The purchase requisition is subject to a release strategy and was not released at the time you attempted to change the purchasing group.
2) In accordance with the attributes defined in Customizing (table T160ex), the combination of purchasing group and material group determines the system that is to process the purchase requisition. This error only occurs if changing the purchasing group results in a different processing system.
Solution
To elimnate this error, you have to implement the corrections contained in this note and perform the following manual corrections:
1) Call transaction SE11.
2) Enter the ETRANSSTAT domain and choose "Change".
3) Switch to the "Value range" tab.
4) Add the following fixed value to the existing fixed values:
Fixed value = 3
Short description (in English): Transfer conditions not fulfilled
5) Save and activate these changes.
reagrding inforecord issue:- I am not aware. but contracts assigned automatically to PR aftre running the report . I dont use inforecord.
Br
Muthu

Procedure or function 'sp_MSupd_dboItems' expects parameter '@bitmap', which was not supplied.

Hello,
when i view replication monitor i get the following error:
Procedure or function 'sp_MSupd_dboItems' expects parameter '@bitmap', which was not supplied. (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 201)
also, in what database the stored procedure 'sp_MSupd_dboItems' found
Can someone help with this error please

I know I am very late to the party.. However, I would like to provide a solution to this problem. I have seen this problem lately and I have fixed it.
This problem occurs when you are replicating the data over to the same target database from multiple sources.
Let me explain briefly with an example.
I have a table namely 'vijay.dbo.test_vj' on ServerA and replicating it over to ServerC with the same schema as 'vijay.dbo.test_vj' at the target database.
I have a table namely 'vijay.dbo.test_vj' on ServerB and replicating it over to ServerC with a different schema as 'vijay.srvrB.test_vj' at the target database.
So, here in this case… the target database is same but the target tables are different (i.e., schema is different). The problem here is that the replication stored procedures (sp_MSins*, sp_MSupd* & sp_MSdel*) that were created by default at the target
database are being used for both the replications of 'srvrB' and 'dbo' schema tables.
When you configure this type of replication, you should give custom names to the replication stored procedures (in the article properties) to allow the Replication to create the stored procedures separately for each table at the target database.
You need to reconfigure one of those replications (either the one for ServerA to ServerC or the one for ServerB to ServerC) by giving a separate names to the replication procedures.
This change will fix your problem.
Regards, Vijay Pidikiti

Distributing source of supply assignment

Hi All,
We have a requirement as below:
We have 4 contracts with 4 vendors for a product at the same time. Now, user creates SC to order 1000 units of this product. We want that system automatically creates 4 POs (because there are 4 contracts) with 250 units (1000/4) for each PO. So, 1 contract is assigned to 1 PO. We're working on SRM 7.
Thanks,
Iqbal

Sachin is correct .Good idea.
You can use this function in both a manual process and an automated process as part of sourcing to generate purchase orders (POs). Quota arrangements allow you to define target percentages and distribute them between two or more purchasing contracts. A quota arrangement ensures that a contract is guaranteed both a minimum sales volume and a defined percentage of the total purchasing volume of a product category or product. A quota arrangement has the highest priority in the sourcing process.
During the validity period of a quota arrangement, there are two phases:
Fulfillment of guaranteed minimums
Before the system assigns contracts based on target percentages, the quota arrangement ensures that all guaranteed minimums of contracts participating in that quota arrangement are fulfilled. The sequence in which the guaranteed minimums are fulfilled is determined by the target percentages defined in the quota arrangement. Guaranteed minimums are defined in the contract.
Assignment of contracts based on target percentages
Once all of the guaranteed minimums of contracts participating in a quota arrangement have been fulfilled, the system continues to automatically assign contracts based on the target percentages defined in that quota arrangement. The winning contract is then determined by the relative difference between the actual release value and the target value of the quota arrangement.
Integration
You use this function in the following applications:
Contract Management
When you order a purchase order against a contract that is part of a quota arrangement, the system automatically updates the release values for each contract line item.
Sourcing
The system shows the winning contract for a quota arrangement in the manual sourcing process.
During manual sourcing, you can access quota arrangement details from the sourcing application.
Prerequisites
You can only create a quota arrangement if a product category or a product is saved in the system, and a contract is available so that you can assign target percentages for the quota arrangement.
Features
The system allows the source of supply to be selected automatically, based on the fulfillment of guaranteed minimums and target percentages defined in the quota arrangement.
A quota arrangement uses standard rules to determine the winning contract in the sourcing process. However, the system can redetermine a winning contract with your own logic if you implement a Business Add-In (BAdI) from Customizing. To access this BAdI in Customizing for SAP Supplier Relationship Management, choose SRM Server Business Add-Ins (BAdIs) Sourcing Redetermination of the Contract to be Used (Quota Arrangement) .
Activities
To create a new arrangement, choose Strategic Purchasing Contract Management Create Documents Quota Arrangements .
You can change an existing quota arrangement, for example, by modifying the target percentages or adding further contracts (with or without a quota base quantity)
Caution
The contracts in a quota arrangement must have the same base unit of measure.
End of the caution.
Note
In the Quota Base Quantity column, you can enter a nominal released quantity for contracts joining an ongoing quota arrangement. This allows you to simulate participation of the new contract in the quota arrangement immediately. If you leave this field blank, the system assigns the new contract with all sourcing requirements, until it catches up with the other contracts participating in the quota arrangement.
End of the note.

Automatic Source of supply selection for Dependent orders.

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where we have one FG (F1) with two assembly components S1 and S2 .Assembly components have their own routings.All the master data is exist in APO as well.An order is created for FG and dependent requirements are generated on assembly Components S1 and S2.Please see below to find the clear picture of routings and operations
In ECC
Operations for FG
Op3
Op4
Operations for S1
Op1
Operations for S2
Op2
We have four resources in Line 1 - R1,R2,R3 and R4
Line 2 - R11,R12,R13 and R14.
Operations are dispatched accordingly in routing.
Op1 - R1,Op2 - R2, Op3 - R3 and Op4 - R4
In APO
PDS created for S1,S2 and FG
Each having two different PDS consisting resources of Line 1 In PDS 1 and Line 2 in PDS 2
My requirements is when order is created against a requirement for FG then dependent requirments is generated for S1 and S2.After MRP run orders are created against dependent requirement.Now if i see the relationship for FG order in Ds Board I can see the dependent orders also.Since my op4 is a bottleneck resource, if there is not much capacity available to produce the order qty then I try to swtich the order from Resource R4 to Resource R14.I am just dragging the order from one resource to other resource but the problem is I want my S1 and S2 orders should also automatically move from R1 to R11 and R2 to R12.
For Finished good's order source of supply is changing but for Assembly components orders its is not changing automatically.Please provide some solution how I can achive this scenario in PPDS.

Hi Debasis
No , it can be used also in Discrete Manufacturing , as APO point of view PDS is master data which can be transferred from routing or recipe
This Heuristic can be find in SCM 7.0 EHP2 only according to this link :
https://websmp207.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000002672&_EVENT=DISPLAY&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000122&_HIER_KEY=501100035870000009166&_HIER_KEY=601100035870000257667&_HIER_KEY=601100035870000258400&
what's the your SCM Version ?
Regards
Rami

Create Deep Entity - Error "No valid source context supplied".

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <error xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata">
<code>CX_XSLT_RUNTIME_ERROR/EE1D984A671BED4AAD4D1BD10D509C75</code>
<message xml:lang="en">No valid source context supplied</message>
- <innererror>
<transactionid>7795A2E3D43AF1FCB4BA42F2E933967A</transactionid>
<errordetails />
</innererror>
</error>
   Inner error message : " Deserialization of XML failed via transformation ''
_______________________________________XML FILE _________________________________________________
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<atom:entry
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices"
xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata">
<atom:content type="application/xml">
<m:properties>
<d:ParentQuestGuid>42F2E933967A1EE3A6C5C06CE7D414BA</d:ParentQuestGuid>
<d:ExternalID>CORRECATE_V08</d:ExternalID>
<d:Planstartdate>2014-01-31T00:00:00</d:Planstartdate>
<d:FinalDate>2014-02-28T00:00:00</d:FinalDate>
<d:Actualfinishtime>PT00H00M00S</d:Actualfinishtime>
</m:properties>
</atom:content>
<atom:link
rel="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/related/zpartners"
type="application/atom+xml;type=feed"
title="Z_V02_AUDIT_SRV.zcorrecact_2_partner">
<m:inline>
<atom:feed>
<atom:entry>
<atom:content type="application/xml">
<m:properties>
<d:REF_GUID m:null="true" />
<d:PARENT_GUID m:null="true" />
<d:EXTERNAL_ID m:null="true" />
<d:Role_Sortnr>1</d:Role_Sortnr>
<d:Role>52</d:Role>
<d:Partner_Role>BUP003</d:Partner_Role>
<d:PARTNER_GUID m:null="true" />
<d:Responsible_Name>102</d:Responsible_Name>
<d:SYUNAME m:null="true" />
<d:ROLE_TEXT m:null="true" />
<d:RESPONSIBLE_TEXT m:null="true" />
<d:LANGU_ISO m:null="true" />
</m:properties>
</atom:content>
</atom:entry>
</atom:feed>
</m:inline>
</atom:link>
</atom:entry>
___________ Tried using the following solutions yet unsuccessful ___________
1) Cleared the cache
/IWBEP/CACHE_CLEANUP
/IWFND/CACHE_CLEANUP
2) Checked all the Date fields for "Nullable", both at header and item entitys.
_________ not clear about my xml format _________________
1) please check the xml format. i read other blogs and feel it is correct.
   Regards,
Nitin Koushik
[email protected]

Hi Nitin,
there seems to be an issue with the xml in the request body.
As an approach, you could try to send two separate requests, in order to check if the creation of the parent entity works and then use the specified link and check if the creation of the child entity works with the given xml. This could help to clarify which part of the xml is actually rejected
I've copied below the xml of a deep insert that works for me.
It is the request body of a POST request sent to the BusinessPartnerCollection of the service ZGWSAMPLE_SRV that can be found here:
https://sapes1.sapdevcenter.com/sap/opu/odata/sap/ZGWSAMPLE_SRV?sap-ds-debug=true
Hope it helps a bit.
Regards,
Carlos
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<entry xml:base="http:/.../sap/opu/odata/sap/ZGWSAMPLE_SRV/"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices">
<category term="ZGWSAMPLE_SRV.BusinessPartner"
scheme="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/scheme"/>
<link href="BusinessPartnerCollection('0100000002')/Contacts"
rel="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/related/Contacts"
type="application/atom+xml;type=feed"
title="Contacts">
   <m:inline>
    <feed xml:base="http://.../sap/opu/odata/sap/ZGWSAMPLE_SRV/">
     <entry>
      <category term="ZGWSAMPLE_SRV.Contact"
         scheme="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/scheme"/>
      <content type="application/xml">
       <m:properties>
        <d:BusinessPartnerID>0100000002</d:BusinessPartnerID>
        <d:Title/>
        <d:FirstName>Maria Julia</d:FirstName>
        <d:MiddleName/>
        <d:LastName>Brown</d:LastName>
        <d:Nickname>Mary</d:Nickname>
        <d:Initials/>
        <d:***>F</d:***>
        <d:PhoneNumber>3023352668</d:PhoneNumber>
        <d:FaxNumber/>
        <d:EmailAddress>[email protected]</d:EmailAddress>
        <d:Language>E</d:Language>
        <d:PostalCode>19899</d:PostalCode>
        <d:City>Wilmington, Delaware</d:City>
        <d:Street>1 2345 King Street</d:Street>
        <d:Building>1</d:Building>
        <d:Country>US</d:Country>
        <d:AddressType>02</d:AddressType>
       </m:properties>
      </content>
     </entry>
    </feed>
   </m:inline>
</link>
<content type="application/xml">
   <m:properties>
    <d:AddressType>02</d:AddressType>
    <d:Country>US</d:Country>
    <d:Street>1 2345 King Street</d:Street>
    <d:PostalCode>19899</d:PostalCode>
    <d:City>Wilmington, Delaware</d:City>
    <d:CurrencyCode>USD</d:CurrencyCode>
    <d:LegalForm>Ltd.</d:LegalForm>
    <d:CompanyName>DelBont Industries3</d:CompanyName>
    <d:BusinessPartnerID>0100000002</d:BusinessPartnerID>
    <d:BpRole>01</d:BpRole>
    <d:EmailAddress>[email protected]</d:EmailAddress>
   </m:properties>
</content>
</entry>

Error 'No valid source context supplied' for getEntity / getEntitySet call

Hi All
we have configured our ECC system with IW_BEP and Gateway as standalone system. We have developed the Gateway Services using SEGW in backend ECC system and have registered these services on Gateway system.
However when we are executing getEntity or getEntitySet methods in Browser or Gateway Client, the call is failing with error message 'No valid source context supplied.'
I checked the error log for this issue and it says Deserialization of XML failed via transformation ''. Can you guys suggest what could be the issue with this error? Is this due to in-correct configuration? In our Gateway system, we have created System-Alias for ECC system with both check-boxes for Local GW & For Local App as unticked. The RFC destination underlying this System alias is working fine.
Please help me on this.
Regards,
Deepak Salokhe

Hello Deepak,
OK thanks for sharing the info regarding Key.
Can u try checking why its failing in method /IWBEP/CL_MGW_REMOTE_HANDLER-->REQUEST_PROCESS ?
Only way is to debug Deepak. Since error is not specific we nned to debug in these kind of cases and try to know y its failing. This might help and we may get some info which will help fixing things.
This problem is only happening for this particular service ? or its happening for all the services ?
Check this first. If its happening for rest of the services then problem is something else with the GW/BE components only. If not then its service specific.
Can u try regenerating objects again and check ?
Regards,
Ashwin

Error when creating a source of supply list via me01 and/otr me05

Dear expert,
We use SAP R/3 4.6c release.
I'm trying to create a source of supply that uses a contract.
I get an error message 'Object does not exist'.
When I look at the details of this messsage I see it is
Message OL 826
Diagnosis :
You tried to create an instance of the object type BUS2053 with the key
0000000000001026311990. No instance of this kind exists.
I have checked SW01 and regenerated the object type BUS2053. The generated object looks ok, but when I test it it still comes up with the same error message.
What did I forget?

HI ,
This is a program error .
Implement Note 683767.
According ti this note it will solve the following problem which is similar to your problem
"When you try to maintain a source list using Transaction ME01, the system generates a termination message with number OL826 'You tried to create an instance of the object type BUS2053 with the key. No instance of this kind exists'. "
Hope it helps you .
Regards,
Anupam

ME57-sources of supply

In ME57 t-code ,for a material ,several purchase requisitions r displayed ,on selection ,a pop window appears to select a vondor from many sources of supply options.
my report is to get only PR's which has a single vendor for automatic assignment to PO.
i need to fix GET EBAN event.
Can anyone help me regarding this.
Regards.

HI Surya,
Source of supply is nothing but automatic determination of vendor or list of possible vendors for that particular product ir product category...
Whenever you are doing Shop then you can find one tab "source of supply tab"..here you can find automatic source of suppply if already maintained.
These we will maintain in process vendor list t-code...
Thanks
Ravi

GOA not picked up as source of supply in R/3 when converting PR to PO

Hi
We are currently using SRM 5.0 extended classic scenario. Here we are using Global outline agreements which will get replicated to backend R/3 system and can be used as source of supply while converting a Purchase requisition to Purchase order. The aim is to use Global outline agreements instead of Info records which will be more flexible.
Once MRP run is done, based on requirement Purchase requisitions are created. Using ME57 we convert the PRs to Purchase orders by assigning source of supply. At this point I would expect the GOA to be picked up,whcih is created against this product. But this is not happening as of now.
Please let me know if there is configuration or prerequisites that need to be done for this.
Also when I am trying to assign the GOA manually in PR, it is throwing the error as 'Item category of contract does not match with Item category in PR', even though both has Item category as 'Standard'.
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
Regards
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Nov 15, 2010 3:15 PM

Hi
GOA is not source of supply Indeed.
whatever you have distributed the GOA as a Purchasing contract is a real source of supply.
if the contract is available in ECC , then it is a valid source of supply for your purchase request.
Can you use the same contract for any other manual / PM /PS purchase request?
Are you assigning same material contract to your purchase request ?
the problem is for only MRP PRs or all PRs.
Muthu

Source of supply is not updating in me53n from fiori App order from Requisition

Hi,
I am using Order from Requisition APP, to create a PO from Approved PRs.
while doing this, there is a step assign Supplier, i am assigning the supplier and created the PO Successfully.
But in backend, when i checked in t-code ME53N for Source of supply tab for a particular PR item. that tab is not updated with vendor details.
when i checked in created PO it gets updated there.
Purchase REquisiton
PO CREATed with above PR
Is there any workaround to update the source of supply in backend.
Thanks,
Venu
Tags edited by: Michael Appleby

Hi,
We are using classic scenario in SRM 5.0.
We are using desired vendor in the purchase requisition, whenever the Purchase requisition is moving into the SRM Sourcing cockpit. We are unable to see the source of supply.
Source of supply is missing in sourcing cockpit (SOCO).
desired vendor number which is not updating, instead it is showing empty.
I have found some BADI like BBP_SOS_BADI and BBP_SOS_BADI_ICC, this BADI will trigger when a shopping cart has contract GUID, but we donu2019t have contract for this purchase requisition.
Could you please tell me the BADI or user EXIT name, by using this BADI I can populate the populate the source of supply and vendor in SOCO.

Source of Supply in PR not filled correctly

Hello,
Could somebody explain me why Source of Supply is sometimes not filled with appropriate data ?
Here is my detailed case :
I have maintained a quota between 2 suppliers.
For supplier 1, I have a contract and no PIR.
For the supplier 2, I have only a PIR.
In the source list, I put the contract for supplier 1 and an entry for supplier 2. Both are relevant for MRP.
I am putting some independant requirements on the material (MD61) and running the MRP.
The PR are well splitted between the 2 sources, but in the PR associated to supplier 2, PIR is not indicated in Source of Supply and sometimes even Purchasing Organization is not found.
In the cases Purchasing Organization is found, but not the PIR, when I am converting the PR in PO, the PIR is found at PO creation.
I do not understand what is missing for the system to put all information directly in PR.
Thank you for your help !
Laetitia

first of all. just one source in the source list can be MRP relevant.
if you flag more than one, then the you cannot be sure which source SAP is determining, either the first or the last.
anyhow in case or quota arrangement, SAP first checks the Quota arrangement, and later checks the source list, e.g. to determine if delivery schedules have to be created or if the source is valid at all.
The quota arrangement has no information about purchasing org. hence this info cannot be filled

Assign Source of Supply for Services

Hi,
I understand that Materials has source list and the system can actually suggest possible vendors for the material via t-code ME25.
However, I am now dealing with services with service master defined and service conditions maintained. I can create PR via ME51 and assign source of supply but I can't do this for PO via ME25 as that is catered for materials only (even if I entered item category D, it shows as a material PO).
My question is, is there any default SAP transactions that allow me to create a service PO with the Assign source supply function? If no, what kind of enhancements can I look into to achieve this?
Thanks!

Hi,
In a normal PO there is no auto assignment of sources so I am not sure why you think that there might be for a services PO?
Remember that to create a PO, you have to specify the vendor first, so how can it assign a source automatically if you have to manually enter the source before you can do anything?
If you are creating a PO with reference to a requisition or contract, again there is no auto source allocation because the source is being taken from the requisition.
So you need to try to allocate the source to the requistion and not the PO
Steve B

Which sources of supply allow scales in their conditions?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for