Which Studio Reference monitors

Sorry that this questions does not have to much to do with final cut though i don't know where i can ask people how know an video edit suite.
I'm looking at buying some Studio reference monitor and have found a pair i think are going to have what i need, untill the question of what happens if i wanted to go from a 2 monitor system and then the need came around for editing 5.1 dolby sound.
The monitors i'm looking at are Roland DS-5 2-way active digital Reference monitors. these have built in amps.
thanks for the help

Asking 'which studio monitors' is liek asking which flavor of ice cream, in some ways. So many choices that range in price, and it's really up to preference and function. What's good is that there are so many models out these days and some excellent inexpensive models, whereas just 6-7 years ago, powered monitors were generally rather pricey and less prolific. Good thing about self-amplified models is that you don't have to take up the extra space with an external amplifier.
I would go into a Guitar Center or Sam Ash and try some out. Depending on how much sound editing/edsign you do, there's a whole plethora of choices that are very affordable. For most video editing purposes, a good pair of 5.25" woofer monitors and 50-75W or so are plenty, unless you have a really large rig/console with a lot of distance between you and the speakers, or yo plan on playing things really loud. You may or may not want to add a subwoofer depending on the sound work you do. The Rolands you mentioned, the M-Audio BX5a, Yamaha HS50M, Samson Resolve 50a, Alesis M1 Active 520, KRK RP5, TapCo S5, and others in the same size/price range will give plenty of volume and accuracy for video work, and even sound design. Choices get more specific and pricier for those who do a lot of recording/mixing and sound work specifically. But a lot of those choices would be overkill for a video editing setup.
It's important that you get the sound to the monitors well, though, and preferably not via a mini-plug to RCA adapter from your computer's rear sound out jack. Look into good USB or Firewire audio interfaces or sound cards. Just about any of the compact powered monitors out these days are much better choices than the subwoofer and computer sattelite speaker packages that you can get at any store selling computer stuff these days.
As for 5.1...I never do any 5.1 surround work. I usually do all my editing and designing in stereo, and when it comes time to the final mix at a facility, we take care of the surround there, because they know how to do it. For most users who try to do 5.1 on whatever software that's available, it usually doesn't come out quite right...either because the mix itself is not good, or they just put things in 5.1 without checking for phasing anomalies, or the process by which the sound is put into 5.1 is just a poor reverse-pro-logic kind of thing. It's just not the same as having the sound professionally mixed and mastered.
I don't know the extent of sound work you do, but in general, I would suggest that you not worry abot 5.1 while editing and finalizing your sound edit/design. It's less to worry about and fight with, and a good stereo edit/mix will sound fine on a system with good pro-logic through a 5.1 speaker system anyway. Plus, speaker and room placement of just a stereo pair is essential enough, with 5.1 it's even more of a pain, if you really want to edit and design accurately. Can you set up all 5 speakers equidistant from your listening position at your editing station without rearranging the entire room? It's much easier with just two speakers, and since they are studio monitors, they are (a little) less dependent on the overall room placement, hence 'nearfield'. 5.1 Surround usually isn't done in editing, it's done in mixing and mastering, where they assign which sounds belong where, and process the whole thing out correctly.
Good luck!

Similar Messages

  • Which Studio Reference Monitors for a video edit suite?

    Sorry that this questions does not have to much to do with Final Cut/Logic Pro though i don't know where i can ask people how know an video edit suite.
    I'm looking at buying some Studio reference monitor and have found a pair i think are going to have what i need, untill the question of what happens if i wanted to go from a 2 monitor system and then the need came around for editing 5.1 dolby sound.
    The monitors i'm looking at are Roland DS-5 2-way active digital Reference monitors. these have built in amps.
    thanks for the help

    my suggestion would be to get something that's an industry standard. that way you can somewhat insure that you're hearing what everyone else is hearing. this is important. i use genelec monitors and i love them. if you have a small room get some 1030 or 8040 monitors.. if you have a larger room, go for a pair of 1031's or 8050's.. then add from there.. also make sure to get a totally passive attenuator: ie.. a-designs atty, or maybe even go into the dangerous line to if you want surrond.. also you have the nautilus stuff and more.. but make sure to take the standard high road and you won't regret it in the end. i have gone from totally crappy monitors to genelecs and everything in between. which means that i have lost money on upgrades when i should have just started with the standard from the beginning..

  • Reference monitor recommendations?

    Any recommendations for good studio reference monitors to use in a modest-budget studio for mixdowns? thanks.

    I have M-Audio with a Fostex Subwoofer... they sparkle!

  • Need Advice on Choosing Reference Monitors / Amp'd Speakers

    I'm a guitarist, have a G5 with Garageband, and an M-Audio USB interface. I don't play in a band, just scew around with Garageband at home in my office. I would like to be able to sell my amp and just use Garageband and my Mac as my "amp". The powered speaker system that I currently have, Altec Lansing with two satellite speakers and a sub in a wooden cabinet, sounds wonderful and is very loud when playing music through iTunes etc... but they just don't have the balls for guitar work. I'd like to replace them with some type of powered studio / reference monitors so that my guitar playing sounds good and I can really crank it up and get LOUD - like if I had say a Line6, or similar amp modeling box running through a small PA system. I don't want to spend alot of money, and I'd like something that will kill both birds (playing my guitar, and just general music listening) with one stone. I don't want to buy a seperate amp to power the monitors either. Does anyone make something like this, does anyone else here do this at home? I'm not up on this stuff, and don't know what the differences are (if any) between studio monitors, reference monitors, and the like. I just want to be able to use Garageband as my guitar amp and get loud.
    One major factor that I notice in sound quality, is that the powered computer speaker systems that have the speakers mounted in wooden cabinets sound considerably better than those with plastic enclosures. Much fuller and warmer... I'd prefer speakers in wooden cabs vs. plastic if possible.
    Thanks for taking the time to read / respond!
    Bill
    iMac G5, Powerbook G4 17in   Mac OS X (10.4.1)   Garageband 3.x, M-Audio USB Midi Interface, Yamaha SG-2000
      Mac OS X (10.4.1)  

    hey there,
    ther are lots of options for studio monitors. how much do you plan to spend? "project-studio" type monitors start around $300.00/pr. & go up to about $1200.00/pr. Pro monitors start around $1600.00/pr. & go to $3,000.00+/pr.
    i have a pr. of Alesis M-one MKii. i wouldn't use monitors w/ less than a 6.5 inch woofer & 60 watt amp to drive it. check out your local pro audio/music store.
    good luck.

  • Which reference monitor would you suggest?

    I need to buy reference monitors for a home studio, which brand should I get?
    Thanks

    In that price range, I'd suggest you check out the following monitors. You might be better off trying to find something used so you can get a little more bang for your buck.
    M-Audio BX5a Deluxe
    Alesis M1 Active MkII
    Alesis M1 Active 520
    Enjoy!

  • Reference Monitor - Capture Card

    I am in the process of finishing our HD editing system Build and had a question about a third monitor setup. The two reqular monitors are the Dell Ultrasharp 2408WFP and the GPU is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295. Even though I am still a fan of for CRT's, the LCD's are getting better. Two of which, the Panasonic BT-LH1760 and the Sony LMD-2050W we have access to. We use PP CS4. For the Reference Monitor and HD-SDI, I assume we need a PCI-e card. I have been reading and have seen some thoughts on the Matrox cards with PP, wonding some thoughts on the following and any suggestions as to how it works with PP CS4:
    Blackmagic DeckLink HD Extreme
    DeckLink Studio
    Blackmagic Intensity Pro

    For Firewire to HDMI, look here:
    http://www.aja.com/html/products_Io.html
    BUT -
    why not just get an HD monitor w/ DVI in? Lot of them have that.
    Going w/ a blackmagic or AJA card will give you more control of whether or not it appears as a 2nd monitor tho.
    Let's face it tho, HD monitoring is the wild wild west. W/out real hi end analysis tools there is no practical difference between having a dedicated 'monitoring' out vs having a shared desktop / 2nd monitor.

  • Only showing frame in reference monitor that I am paused on

    This seems to have just started happening out of no where.
    My reference monitor is no longer playing through the project and showing each frame, it will only show the frames if I scrub through them or pause / start on them.
    All I did was put in a new audio track (which I removed but didn't solve the problem)

    One has never been able to play footage nor have realtime scopes in the reference monitor.
    You can only scrub to make it move.
    Only Source monitor and Program monitor play realtime.

  • Connect MacBook with Studio Display Monitor (2000)

    I am trying to connect my MacBook with an old Studio Display monitor (made in 2000) that has an ADC 30 Male cord. I have a Mini-DVI to DVI 24 Female Adapter that fits into my laptop. I can't seem to find a DVI 24 Male to ADC 30 Female adapter, which is what appears I need. Is there anything I can do to make this work? Thanks!

    http://www.amazon.com/Apple-Dvi-i-Adc-Display-Adapter/dp/B00011KHT2

  • Multi-cam vs. the Reference monitor

    I use multi-cam to cut two views together.
    Each view is in its own sequence, and those two sequences are the two tracks in the "multicam source"
    While viewing the "multicam destination" sequence,  I often use the Application-wide keyboard shortcut to "Toggle Multi-camera View".
    I like to keep the Reference Monitor up with some scopes on it while editing, to keep an eye on the relative color between the two cameras.
    Sometimes, the Reference Monitor pops back to "Composite" view, instead of my scopes.  It happens SOMETIMES when I use the hotkey to
    toggle Multi-camera view.
    Whether it changes the Reference Monitor view depends on which panel has focus when I hit the hot key!
    1) If the Program monitor has focus, and I hit the hot key to toggle Multi-Camera View, no problem, the Ref monitor stays on scopes as I want.
    2) If the Timeline panel has focus, then the silly Reference Monitor pops back to Composite View.
    FYI, I checked, and there is no specific Timeline panel hotkey using the same keystroke (I am using shift-6)
    Any idea if there is something to prevent the Ref Monitor from changing its settings from scopes to Composite like this?
    I doubt this is an intended behavior, probably just an odd edge case.
    I do see that the Program Monitor panel has an available keyboard shortcut called "Multi-Camera", but since I don't have the problem when focus is in the Program Monitor, I don't think this is relevant.  (I have it assigned to no keyboard shortcut right now).
    As a side note, It would be really nice if the program monitor could remember for each sequence whether it should be showing "Multi-Camera View" or not. 
    I often have to switch between looking at the multi-cam destination, and looking at other sequences... and it makes no sense that those other sequences should be viewed in Multi-cam mode, just because some other sequence was being viewed in multi-cam mode.   No?
    Keith
    Premiere Pro CC, Version 7.0.1 (105)
    OS X 10.8.5

    Right,
    So here was the problem, in case any of you people out there are going nuts with what appears to be a broken project.  
    In the timeline above the multicam layer, I was dropping in graphics. I was cutting and pasting them in.
    In order to do so I have to highlight the layer that I want to drop the graphics onto.
    As shown below.
    As soon as a layer gets a highlight other than the Multicam layer, the Program Monitor will no longer show multicam.
    Remove the highlighted layer as seen below.
    Hope this helps someone.
    Cheers..

  • Reference Monitor Stopped Working

    While working on a project I had to use "Interpret footage" to change the frame rate and pixel aspect ratio on a clip. After making the change, my reference monitor stopped working correctly.
    Prior to making the above frame rate change, I was using the reference monitor for a waveform analysis which would play smoothly on both the Program and Reference monitors. Once I made the clip change, I lost the ability for the reference monitor to play smoothly-- it only holds an image of a single frame. In order to see the clip play I have to hold down the right arrow button. The program monitor works fine. And yes, it is set to gang.
    The interpret footage command screwed something up. Any ideas?
    I'm using Premiere CS2 with XP Pro Service Pack 3. NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400 card, AMD Dual Opteron 254 processors on a Tyan Thunder mobo.

    Hey,
    I had this exact same problem!
    I know this is an old thread, but just incase someone comes along here looking for a working solution,
    Liquid80 from http://forums.adobe.com/thread/688529
    posted this answer,
    "Then  for some reason I decided to click on "Window" on the menu bar without  even thinking and then clicked "Program Monitor"!!! PROBLEM SOLVED!!!
    There  are TWO different views. One called "Program Monitor" and the other  called "Reference Monitor" and the annoying thing is they look nearly  identical but function differently!!!
    So all this time you had "Reference Monitor" open instead of "Program Monitor"."
    All the best

  • Reference monitor for digital cinema workflow

    We use the Digital cinema workflow to create 2K title sequences for theatres. We plan to ad a 2K reference monitor into our workflow. The problem is that the video-out path for preview on reference monitors is not color-managed.
    Is there a way to see a correct image on a referrence monitor in adjusting the monitor with LUTs?
    Where can I find the needed LUTs?
    Which monitor do You recommend?
    I use After Effects CS3, Mac OSX 10.5.5, 2x2,8 Ghz Quad-Core Intel Xenon, 6GB RAM, Blackmagic HDExtreme2, Grafic card ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

    I'm trying to find out much the same thing. I would assume that anyone knows the answers can help both of us.
    I'm purchasing a new Mac Pro desktop. I also use final cut but not after effects.
    I actually have 4 monitors to choose from. 2 Dell 19" - One 27" Apple cinema display and a spector High Def 1080i monitor that has a DVI input.
    I would like to use one of the Dell's as my primary home desk top monitors with folders and all the usual dock and stuff. I would like to use the cinema display as my primary final cut work surface.
    I would like to use the HD monitor to show HD footage and use it as a client monitor. Remember it has a DVI input.
    I've talked with the folks at the Local Apple store and they are not sure if I will get a real HD signal on the HD monitor if I add a second radeon 2700 card to the computer and take on of those DVI outputs and attach it to the HD monitor.
    If thats not possible can I use the apple cinema display as my playback monitor?
    Or do I have to go with a conversion box like a mxo, AJA board, or decklink box.
    The goal is to have two monitors for the program and One monitor in HD for the client monitor,
    Thanks everyone in advance.
    Rich

  • Reference monitor defaults as ganged to Program monitor. Looking for fix.

    I'm encountering an issue using PPro CC (7.2.2) where editing a clip into the timeline- either from the source window or from a bin- automatically opens the Reference monitor and has it ganged to the Program monitor.  I keep turning that off, but it happens again.
    Is anyone having this issue?
    Any easy ways to resolve?
    Thanks
    Mike

    you could write a daemon method which would, every so often, search the forums for the keyword.
    Better yet, you can use google's "site: bbs.archlinux.org keyword format to do your search.
    But, be sure not to do it too often. If you keep banging a particular forum website too often, your ip might get banned.

  • FR: Reference Monitor Live Update

    *******Enhancement / FMR*********
    REFERENCE MONITOR LIVE UPDATE
    The Reference Monitor should update with every frame displayed, just as the Source and Program Monitor do.  This applies to playback as well as scrubbing.
    Why is this feature important to you?
    Live scopes AND program at the same time.  (How is it that at version 7, a 'professional' NLE still can't do this?)
    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

    You've got me curious.
    Which ideas do you disagree with?
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369235?tstart=60
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369232?tstart=0
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1371240?tstart=60
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369233?tstart=60
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369239?tstart=60
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369263?tstart=60
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369265?tstart=60
    Are there any you do agree with?

  • MacBook Pro display usable as a reference monitor for a camera shoot?

    I am shooting a video project and wish to try and use my 17" Mac Pro display screen as a reference monitor on a live mini-DV camera shoot for focus and color versus lugging around a heavier CRT and battery back. Will the MacPro display be sufficient to significantly judge color, exposure, and focus? I know it's not ideal, but with improvements in LCD displays over the last few years I would like to hear from other users who may have tried using their display screens in this way and see what their results were.
    Many thanks,
    John

    While the answer in itself is probably no, you could however spend some time to get yourself a known comparitive situation. With some careful calibration and comparison to a final result you should be able to get it to a point where, while not perfect, you know what you're going to get.
    By the way, the matte display will produce far more consistent colour than the glossy display.
    Utlimately though for the best results the suggested CRT solution is the one to go for even though it's somewhat a pain.

  • Reference monitor doesn't play simultaneously in real time? How is it used?

    I thought the point is to have two monitors playing back simultaneously for scopes / composite or to send to a secondary feed for clients, similar to video village on set.

    Not sure why you started a new thread on this ..but anyway.
    The reference monitor is not designed or suitable for a secondary feed to external monitors.
    It is used to have two looks at same frame eg a composite and a scope
    or two looks at  different frames eg unganged .  This maybe for a CC and grading comparison.
    It is not absolutely vital that it plays in real time for either of these instances.

Maybe you are looking for