Which trxn for Support staff to terminate users in a Load Balance system

We have trxn sm04, but it will only provide users that are logged into the system that you have been sent to in a load balance environment.
I was also considering al08, but that does not allow support staff to terminate users.
Is there another trxn?
Please advise, we want to determine a strategy for the support staff before we roll out load balancing to all SAP users
B.Regards,
Maria

>
nirmal konchada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In ST03 ransaction you have something called as transaction list, there you can find your transaction and after double clicking it you can find the list of users working on that transaction.
>
> Once the list is clear you can disconnect the user through SM51.
>
>
> Regards,
> Nirmal.K
Thank you for the advise. However I cannot locate in transaction ST03 the information you indicated. Also, your directions are confusing to me.
Maria

Similar Messages

User restrication on load balance VIP

we need to implement below requirement can any one suggest how to imlement it
1.Sticky command
Once a connection is opened to a physical server, any requests coming from a particular client always go to that server, until either the timeout is reached or the user session is terminated
2.Client-assigned load balancing
All requests coming from a specific client always go to the same physical server. This is done through recognition of the clients IP address.
3.User session restrictions
User name / IP session restriction based on parameter values(ie only 1 user can login at a time).
Please find the below config
service test1
ip address 10.8.1.25
protocol tcp
keepalive type http
keepalive port 80
active
service test2
ip address 10.8.1.26
protocol tcp
keepalive type http
keepalive port 80
active
content DSS-R1
protocol tcp
vip address 10.8.1.1
port 80
advanced-balance sticky-srcip-dstport
add service test1
add service test2
active
please suggest me how to implement all three points whereas point 3 is very crucial & urgent.

1/ is done with the advanced-balance command.
I would suggest to replace the current one with 'advanced-balance sticky-srcip' since the destination port is always 80 [per config].
2/ you can force a client to go to a particular server with an acl and the prefer option.
ie:
acl 1
clause 10 permit tcp x.x.x.x destination content owener/DSS-R1 prefer test1
clause 99 permit any any destination any
apply all
acl enable
3/ we will need more details.
Not much can be done so, because the CSS only counts active connections.
So, you can restrict 1 user at a time with the command 'maxconn 1' but I'm not sure if it will help.
You should test it first and see if it does what you need.
Regards,
Gilles.

Terminate SSL on Cisco Load Balancer

Hi,
We have a rights Management server that will be behind a load balancer. I would like to terminate the SSL on the Load balancer instead of terminating it on the LC server. is there any settings need to be set on the LC server. I will appreciate any help on this topic.

Check the following basic ssl config
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_%28ACE%29_Configuration_Examples_--_SSL_Configuration_Examples
I think you do get a little of ssl resource without a license.
Gilles.

Webdispatcher for Load balancing

Hi All,
We have implemented EP7. The portal is configured to redirect to https.
Now we want to use sapwebdispatcher for load balancing.
We are performing the following steps to configure the sapwebdispatcher
1. uncar the icmadmin.SAR
2. sapwebdisp -bootstrap
The following screen appears:
This bootstrap will perform the following steps:
1. create profile file "sapwebdisp.pfl"for SAP Web Dispatcher (if not already existing)
2. create user for web based administration in file "icmauth.txt"(if not already exisiting)
3. start SAP Web Dispatcher with the created profile
After the bootstrap you can use the web based administration
Generating Profile "sapwebdisp.pfl"
Hostname of Message Server (rdisp/mshost): <hostname>
HTTP Port of Message Server (ms/http_port): 8101
Checking connection to message server...OK
Unique Instance Number for SAP Web Dispatcher (SAPSYSTEM): 38
HTTP port number for SAP Web Dispatcher: 8101
Create configuration for s(mall), m(edium), l(arge) system (default: medium): l
WARNING: Maximum number of sockets supported on this system: 2045
Please check the operating system configuration
Profile "sapwebdisp.pfl" generated
Authentication file "icmauth.txt" generated
Web Administration user is "icmadm" with password "xxxxxxxxx"
Restart sapwebdisp with profile: sapwebdisp.pfl
sapwebdisp started with new pid 14014
Web administration accessible with "http://<hostname>:8101/sap/wdisp/admin/default.html"
SAP Web Dispatcher bootstrap ended (rc=0)
<hostname>47> *** WARNING: Could not start service 8101 for protocol HTTP on host "<hostname>m"(on all adapters)
SAP Web Dispatcher up and operational (pid: 14014) ***
Now, if I use any port other than 8101 for HTTP port number for SAP Web Dispatcher the webdispatcher does not work.
If i use port 8101(which i am using currently) then the webdispatcher does the load balancing however i cannot access the http://<hostname>:8101/sap/wdisp/admin/default.html url
Can anyone help me getting both thigs: load balancing and the webdisp admin page also.
Thanks!!
Regards,
Rohit

Hi Rohit,
this is your Profile File
Generating Profile "sapwebdisp.pfl"
Hostname of Message Server (rdisp/mshost): <hostname>
HTTP Port of Message Server (ms/http_port): 8101
Checking connection to message server...OK
Unique Instance Number for SAP Web Dispatcher (SAPSYSTEM): 38
HTTP port number for SAP Web Dispatcher: 8101
Create configuration for s(mall), m(edium), l(arge) system (default: medium): l
WARNING: Maximum number of sockets supported on this system: 2045
Please check the operating system configuration
Profile "sapwebdisp.pfl" generated
Authentication file "icmauth.txt" generated
Web Administration user is "icmadm" with password "xxxxxxxxx"
Restart sapwebdisp with profile: sapwebdisp.pfl
sapwebdisp started with new pid 14014
Web administration accessible with "http://<hostname>:8101/sap/wdisp/admin/default.html"
You have wrongly configured your HTTP port number for SAP Web Dispatcher make it as 80 by default
Sample Profile File:
Profile generated by sapwebdisp bootstrap
unique instance number
SAPSYSTEM = 1
add default directory settings
DIR_EXECUTABLE = .
DIR_INSTANCE = .
Accessibility of Message Servers
rdisp/mshost = Hostname
ms/http_port = 8101
SAP Web Dispatcher Parameter
wdisp/auto_refresh = 120
wdisp/max_servers = 100
wdisp/shm_attach_mode = 6
configuration for small scenario
icm/max_conn      = 100
icm/max_sockets   = 1024
icm/req_queue_len = 300
icm/min_threads   = 5
icm/max_threads   = 15
mpi/total_size_MB = 20
#maximum number of concurrent connections to one server
wdisp/HTTP/max_pooled_con = 100
wdisp/HTTPS/max_pooled_con = 100
SAP Web Dispatcher Ports
icm/server_port_0 = PROT=HTTP,PORT=80
icm/server_port_1 = PROT=ROUTER,PORT=443
Swapnil

Virtual Hosts for Load Balancing

Hi all,
So I have two identical servers, that have SOA Suite installed pointing to the same database. (RHEL 4) I have configured the mod_oc4j.conf file for round robin, and then I created a virtual host on the httpd.conf file to point to the load balance hardware.
It worked! But with a slight issue. The Load Balance server is orasoaqa.tmpw.net:7777, which opens the main Application Server page. However, when I click on BPEL console, or ESB, it continues using the orasoaqa.tmpw.net:7777 virtual, which of course, breaks even trying to login.
What am I missing here? Here's the entry I added to mod_oc4j.conf:
Oc4jSelectMethod roundrobin:local
Here's the entry I added to the httpd.conf on server 1:
Port 7777
Listen 7777
NameVirtualHost XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:7777
<VirtualHost orasoaqaapp101.ma.tmpw.net:7777>
ServerName orasoaqa.tmpw.net
ServerAlias orasoaqaapp101.ma.tmpw.net
Port 7777
</VirtualHost>
and on server 2:
Port 7777
Listen 7777
NameVirtualHost XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:7777
<VirtualHost orasoaqaapp102.ma.tmpw.net:7777>
ServerName orasoaqa.tmpw.net
ServerAlias orasoaqaapp102.ma.tmpw.net
Port 7777
</VirtualHost>
Yes, the port for Application Server and the port on the Load Balancer are exactly the same, I hope this isn't the issue.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Message was edited by:
CooperHawkes

Seeing that you have an external load balancer available, you really should not be trying software load balancing. Windows NLBS is a software based load balancing and is not really dependent on the physical/virtual hosting of the OS. There are certain gotchas
w.r.t the NLB modes since they depend on network protocols such as arp, propagation of MAC addresses and usage of the MAC in the L2 routing tables of network devices.
You should be taking the help of the cloud service provider as ONLY they would have an understanding of their underlying networking infrastructure such as VLANS. addressing, routing rules and such.
You could also refer to the VMware support forum for KB's such as
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1006580
Most importantly, NLBS is a base OS related service and you're more likely to get a response in the Windows Server Forum. In the specific case of BizTalk, the Windows NLB is only used for hosting the out of process services such as those associated with
HTTP/s Receive, orchestration published as schemas, web services (asmx) and/or WCF endpoints.
Regards.

Network Load Balancing for AFP Sharing

Dear all,
Anyone can kindly teach me how can I configure network load balancing with 2 xserve?
Currently I success to bond 6 ethernet port with a virtual IP in a single machine and I have a link aggregation setup in my switch. It works fine.
How to configure 2 xserve with 6 ethernet port per each to have a single virtual IP?
my switch do not support link aggregation with a virtual IP to do the load balancing so I just can consider to do it in software level.
Anyone know whether OS Leopard/Snow Leopard can do it? Or any suggestion for 3rd party software can perform this?
Thanks expert!
Karl

It sounds like you need a load balancer. There's nothing built-in to Mac OS X Server that's going to support one virtual IP address shared across multiple physical servers.
Your problem, though, is likely to be one of throughput - I don't know any cheap load balancers that will sustain that kind of throughput, so you may be looking at some serious $$$$s.
There are some software-based load balancers that might be able to handle the load balancing side of things but many of them are designed around HTTP so might not work so well for other protocols.
In addition, the software load balancer is going to suffer the same bottleneck as your AFP server, but doubly so - two servers with 6 x 1gbps links each you have a theoretical limit of 12gbps.
To run that through a load balancer, the load balancer will need double that - 12gbps for the client-side, plus 12gbps for the server side. In reality you're probably looking at needing 10gbps interfaces and switches if you're really pulling that much bandwidth.

Recommended configuration for load balanced Portal with load balancer, multiple gateways and multiple servers.

Does anyone have a recommended network, hardware and software configuration guide for a Portal installation running with multiple gateways load balanced (ie one URL) that talk to multiple servers?

David,
We've used Resonate (software) to load balance the gateways. It allows
you to group all the gateways under 1 virtual URL and load balance the
incoming connections over each gateway depending on the rules that you
define in Resonate. Look in the SUN portal whitepapers there is one that
talks about it specifically.
As far as load balancing the calls to the portals, the gateways will
automatically load balance across all the portals that they know about
using a simple round-robin rotation. You may be able to use Resonate in
front of the portals but you may need to activate persistance within
Resonate to ensure that the user always ends up on the portal that he
established his initial connection on (if you want that), check with Sun
on this one.
David Broeren wrote:
Recommended configuration for load balanced Portal with load balancer,
multiple gateways and multiple servers.
Does anyone have a recommended network, hardware and software
configuration guide for a Portal installation running with multiple
gateways load balanced (ie one URL) that talk to multiple servers?
Try our New Web Based Forum at http://softwareforum.sun.com
Includes Access to our Product Knowledge Base!

Is apache reverse proxy server/F5 Load Balancer support to Sharepoint 2010

Hi ,
I have two tool for implement reverse proxy
-Apache reverse proxy
-F5 load balancer
Kindly let me know sharepoint 2010 support this,if support then how to configured.
Hasan Jamal Siddiqui(MCTS,MCPD,ITIL@V3),Sharepoint and EPM Consultant,TCS
|
| Twitter

Thanks Sebastian,
Please let me know,I have only NTLM Authentication,we are not using FBS.
For NTLM authentication what we need to do.
Hasan Jamal Siddiqui(MCTS,MCPD,ITIL@V3),Sharepoint and EPM Consultant,TCS
|
| Twitter

Load balancing for specific services in RAC

Hi,
I have a two node RAC database 11gR2 version.I am planning to create 2 services for the database.For one of the services I dont want to enable server side load balancing and for the other one I want to enable load balancing.Will the following setting work
services:
srv1 -- load balancing not to be enabled
srv2 -- load balancing to be enabled
DB configuration:
For srv1 I will not use SCAN ip and I will connect using the vip of the servers.
For srv2 I will use SCAN ip and i will set the remote_listener(to SCAN:port) parameter and local listener parameter accordingly.
Will this serve my purpose
Thanks
Sekar

If the database is admin-managed, I shall suggest that rather than playing with the remote_listener parameter , set one service as preferred for one instance.For the other service, let it be preferred on both the nodes. The service with just one instance as Preferred won't be able to use loab-balancing as there is just one instance available for its disposal.
HTH
Aman....

Load balancing for SAP R3 through ITS for EP .

Dear All
We are using ITS bease SAP R3 iviews in EP ..The landscape is as follows
EP --> ITS --> SAP R3 .
We need to configure a load balancing from EP to R3. Currently the ITS is set to hit one Application server on SAP r3 . How do i configure load balancing in EP for R3 .
Even if we use the Load Balancing Iview, it does not prompt to enter SAP R3 Application servers in the EP Load balancing iview properties.
all it asks is the ITS server and SAP server for connectors.
Regards
Jayesh

Please do the following steps to accomplish load balancing. It includes both ITS definition and system definition.
ITS Definition:
System definition alone will not help. Because you are using ITS to access SAP R/3. ITS uses global.srvc file to access SAP R/3 system.
When you install ITS you have option to choose connection with SAP R/3. You have two options here.
1) Message server with load balancing
2) Application server.
If you choose option 1, you will have load balancing on SAP R/3 using ITS.

Configuring ACE 4710 for Load Balancing Speech servers

Hello, I'm configuring ACE 4710's for the first time and I want to load balance my Nuance speech servers on port 554. Here's my configuration on ACE01:
hostname ace471001
interface gigabitEthernet 1/1
switchport access vlan 1000
no shutdown
interface gigabitEthernet 1/2
shutdown
interface gigabitEthernet 1/3
shutdown
interface gigabitEthernet 1/4
shutdown
access-list ALL line 8 extended permit ip any any
rserver host nss01
class-map type management match-any remote_access
2 match protocol xml-https any
3 match protocol icmp any
4 match protocol telnet any
5 match protocol ssh any
6 match protocol http any
7 match protocol https any
8 match protocol snmp any
policy-map type management first-match remote_mgmt_allow_policy
class remote_access
permit
interface vlan 1000
ip address 10.20.17.21 255.255.248.0
access-group input ALL
service-policy input remote_mgmt_allow_policy
no shutdown
How would I configure my speech server to isten on 554?
Thanks in advance

Hello Reginald
Currently you have only basic network configuration, there is no loadbalancing config
I'm not sure what exactly you're asking about , but basically you need to have
- real servers configured on ACE (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/rsfarms.html#wp999495)
- serverfarm configured on ACE (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/rsfarms.html#wp1014522)
- L7 policy map (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html#wp1171109 ,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html#wp1027248 )
- L4 policy map , class-map (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html#wp1027819)
And then apply it on necessary interface.
This is a general configuration, in your specific case you may need to configure some additinal features (e.g. I think you will need to have stickiness enabled
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/sticky.html but it depends on your application)
links are for old config guids , but basic is pretty much the same for all versions.
Please check them and try to narrow down your question a bit.

Does Traffic Manager provide database load balancing for MySQL?

I need two VMs to implement MySQL Cluster in Windows Azure. VMs allow configure endpoint load balance set for Mysql, but I did not find tcp protocol in Traffic Manager. Does it provide this service for database
load balancing?

Hi,
Traffic Manager works on the DNS level and routes traffic between public endpoints that sit behind a common DNS name. So you can't use this for your scenario.
However, You can implement
load balancing for VMs in another way.
Edward

RDWA - limit to one monitor full screen for IT support staff

In our shop, we use RDWA to access the Windows 7 virtual desktops, server is Windows Server 2012.
Since IT support staff have two monitors, when they login to user's virtual desktop for testing / support purpose, the display will be spanned across two monitors. We want to keep the user's virtual desktop in one monitor and use the other monitor
to other purpose, e.g. searching internet for problem resolution, email, etc.
Is there a way to restrict the virtual desktop to show up full screen in just one monitor.
I have searched the forum but seems not getting the answer.
Assistance appreciated.

Hi TP,
Thanks for your reply.
In your previous response, you mentioned there are other methods for IT support staff to connect to the user's virtual desktop.
>> "How exactly are they using it to connect to a Windows 7 VM? Are they using the Connect to remote PC tab and entering the name of the VM, or do they have access to the same virtual desktop collection as the user, or are they
logging on to RDWeb using the end user's credentials, or ?"
May I know how the other connection methods can be achieved?
Thanks for your advise.

No User Authentication for support pages

While testing I notice that entering the full URL's in the browser address bar for
Support Tickets ( SupportPage.aspx)
KnowledgeBase (support/default.aspx, SolutionDetail.aspx and Search.aspx)
Takes a user straight to those pages without forcing a login.
Is there a way of forcing a login to access these pages?
The Knowledge Base is perhaps less import but the current environment allows Support Tickets to entered without a UserID which does not make sense.

Jay,
Went in as manager I cleared the Cache (- it still reports 5 items in the cache though ) and cleaned memory
I logged out. and then typed in the URL's
There I was back in support again and this time in the support ticket page the userID and BP ID were showing as manager and internal
Seems something is still being held in memory - but surely this shouldn't happen if I'd properly logged out.
I closed the site and re-opened - this time although I could get back to support using the URLs again without logging in , no UserID and BP Id were displayed on the support ticket page.
I wonder if there is anything in the settings causing this?

My AppStore id is my apple id n password which is good when purchasing. But when I am updating from update option it ask for a password. The user id I see there is not mine, it's different. How do I change that to my apple Id? Please help me resolve .....

My AppStore id is my apple id n password which is good when purchasing. But when I am updating from update option it ask for a password. The user id I see there is not mine, it's different. How do I change that to my apple Id? Please help me resolve this issue. I have tried resetting it but nothing... Either I'm doing something wrong or....

I believe the issue is with the Apple ID that was used to purchase the App. If you download an App that was purchased under a different Appple ID then all updates will also be linked to the original purchaser's Apple ID. Your Apple ID is the the same ID as your iTunes, iCloud, etc. Some folks use different ID for the different Apple sites. No need for that One ID for all Apple Sites, and if someone else buys an App using their ID and they(you) download that App onto your device and that App requires an update it will ask for the purchasers Apple ID. This happens a lot when folks sell their iPad or give it to someone else and leave some purchased(free) Apps on the iOS device. You cannot change the original ID the App was purchased under. A suggestion would be if someone else has an App that you like but do not want to pay for use their ID or in the future have them gift the App to you.

Which trxn for Support staff to terminate users in a Load Balance system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for