Which version of Galaxy S6 works better with At&t G920I or G920F?

Which version of Galaxy S6 works better with At&t G920I or G920F? I heard that the bands are way different so before purchasing anything I will like to hear if there is anyone having already an unlocked galaxy s6 working properly with At&t?

Thanks GLIMMERMAN76 The reason why I asked its because I order this:  http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1136399-REG/samsung_g920i_32gb_black_galaxy_s6_sm_g920i_32gb.html And I had several issues with the signal where on my previous iPhone 5 I was getting speeds of 35mbps on the G920i I was getting 5 to 7 mbps I called At&t customer support told me that they could not register my devices on their network because the imei was not supported or something like that so I contact the store where I order this and return it since it was not working for me (because of the LTE speeds) Now Im concerned and want to order the right model this time. What are your download speeds? where they able to register your devices in the At&t network? -Thank you.

Similar Messages

  • Which version of Adobe Flash works properly with Mac operating systems?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no0Fn_gIoCo
    On Xat Flash Chatrooms it freezes. I thought Adobe Flash Beta 12 would fix my problem of the chats animations and chat freezing but it only temporarily fixed it because when I rebooted my Mac it still freezes the animation and chat! The latest versions of Adobe Flash non-beta Adobe Flash 11 something freezes too! Which specific Version of ADOBE Flash works properly on Mac OSX? NONE?
    I'm on Safari Browser and Mavericks 10.9 OSX.
    Specs:
    Haswell 3.4ghz
    graphics card: gtx 760
    4 gigs of ddr3 ram
    Macbook 2009: My other mac that does it too
    Intel duo 2 core 2.13ghz
    4gigs ddr2 ram
    I believe my macbook is running Nvidia 9400m 250mb card
    So each Mac that has had this problem is running Nvidia tho I don't know if thats the problem and I doubt it is. I'm sure it's a bug in Adobe Flash and Apple not caring enough to address the problems with Adobe Flash not working properly. If the two companies can't get a long, then why doesn't apple spend a little bit of money making their own compatible Flash for their safari browser?
    My friend who is a girl that I talked to on Xat said that she has a Macbook I think from 2010 or 2011 running Mavericks and her Macbook does not freeze. Is there an explanation to why my Macbook 2009 freezes in Adobe Flash and if there's a solution to it? Is her Macbook running ati card maybe?
    This is becoming very frustrating, so I need a solution. It does this on my Macbook and my Desktop Mac both which have Nvidia gpus.

    The latest Flash 11 works fine for me on Mavericks, on every site that plays videos.
    I have no idea what Xat Flash Chatrooms is (and really have no interest), but it sounds like the issue is with that site, as Flash in general works for literally tens of millions of people on most other sites.

  • Which version of photoshop elements works with yosemite

    which version of photoshop elements works best with Yosemite, PSE 13?

    Actually versions pse 6 through pse 13 work on mac os x 10.10 Yosemite, but pse 12 and pse 13 might work better, since they are 64 bit applications and can use a lot more ram than pse 6 through pse 11, which are 32 bit applications and only use a limited amount of ram somewhere around 3 gbs of ram max.
    You might as well get pse 13, since it's the current version adobe sells.

  • Why does iMessages does not work properly ? Please help me ! Its works better with the previous version if compared with the latest iOS

    Why does iMessages does not work properly ? Please help me ! Its works better with the previous version if compared with the latest iOS

    Many, many thanks for both of you Todd and Rick.
    to Rick:
    I suppose you mean the Color Settings in Project Settings as follows:
    - Working Space: None
    - Match Legacy ... Gamma Adjustments checked ON
    But it does not correct the colors in effects. And checking or unchecking Make Movie/Output Module Settings/Color Management/Profile/Preserve RGB does not make any difference.
    to both of you:
    Those parts of the video image that does not have color effects are just fine. In these parts the color is preserved when reimporting to FCP. However, those parts having color effects (except Levels, as decribed earlier) have altered color results. So, only the parts having effects affecting color are misinterpreted in the image area. The mismatch is of course seen in AE, before making the movie.
    What I ment with "Color Management not working properly" is that (instead of "disabling" it) Color Management does not seem to be able to correct this "misinterpretation" or difference in effect handling between AE 6 and 10.
    So, would you have any solution for this problem?
    Again, many thanks for your fast replies!

  • Will the newest version of Safari Mavericks work properly with Snow Leopard?

    Will the newest version of Safari Mavericks work properly with Snow Leopard?

    Are you asking if you can install Mavericks on a machine running Snow Leopard?
    Upgrade to Mountain Lion/Mavericks.
    Check that your computer is compatible with Mountain Lion/Mavericks.
    To check the model number hold down the option/alt key, go to the Apple menu and select System Information.
    iMac (Mid 2007 or newer) model number 7,1 or higher
    MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer) model number 5,1 or higher
    MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer) model number 3,1 or higher
    MacBook Air (Late 2008 or newer) model number 2,1 or higher
    Mac mini (Early 2009 or newer) model number 3,1 or higher
    Mac Pro (Early 2008 or newer) model number 3,1 or higher
    Xserve (Early 2009) model number 3,1 or higher
    Your Mac needs:
    OS X v10.6.8 or OS X Lion already installed
    2 GB or more of memory (More is better - 4 GB minimum seems to be the consensus)
    8 GB or more of available space
    Check to make sure your applications are compatible. PowerPC applications are no longer supported.      
    Application Compatibility
    You can also check which applications are PowerPC by going to the  menu, select About this Mac, click on More info…, then click System Report and select Software/Applications.
    If you do decide to upgrade, make sure you do a backup before installing.

  • Which versions of Window can perform best with CiscoWorks?

    Hi,
    Please advice that currently we have 3200 logical devices configured on CiscoWorks and CiscoWorks is running very very slow. CiscoWorks installed on server with Windows Server 2003 32-bit and this version of windows it can only support RAM up to 4GB, which is already installed. In order to increase the RAM we have to upgrade the windows version as well.
    Please advise that which versions of Window can perform best with CiscoWorks.  E.g. Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 1 (SP1), Standard Edition 64-bit: or Windows server 2008 etc. Please advise us the full windows release version as we will upgrade windows as per your suggestion.
    We are currently using the LMS 3.2, RME 4.3.0, CM 5.2.1

    Please refer to the Installation Guide for Windows server requirements. Here is the link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_lan_management_solution/3.2/install/guide1/prereq.html#wp1099303
    Given that you want to stay with Windows Server, Server 2008 Standard Edition with service Pack 2 would be your best choice.
    NOTE that your should not (and cannot) use Server 2008 R2. That version in only supported with LMS 4.0.1. LMS 3.2 will not work with Server 2008 R2.
    With a 64-bit OS, you can increase your RAM - which is usually constraining system performance on systems with 32-bit OS. I recommend just putting in 16 MB. Why skimp on $100 RAM with $20,000 software?
    Your other alternative is to divide the server roles across several machines. That is a pretty complex task so I'd do the OS and RAM upgrade first and see how that helps you out.
    Re "Linux" LMS 3.2 (and 4.0/4.0.1) is only supported on Windows and Solaris operating systems. Plus if you're not a Uniux admin, the learning curve can be steep for your first dip in the water.

  • Which versions of eos utility are compatible with dpp4 and 5d mark ii?

    Which versions of eos utility are compatible with dpp4 and 5d mark ii? I selected "remote shooting" in dpp 4.2.1 and "A compatible version of EOS Utility not installed" msg displayed. (I installed eu 2.14.20 & DPP 4 yesterday)

    hdevaney wrote:
    Robert,Thank you for the timely response. Please note the reply received from Canon EOS Digital Support:Subject: Response from Canon - EOS Digital Cameras > EOS 5D Mark II“Normally, when using DPP 4.2.10, you would need to download and install the corresponding EOS Utility 3.2.10 for the remote shooting feature.  However, at this time, the EOS Utility 3.2.10 does not support the EOS 5D Mark II.If you are shooting remotely, you will have to launch the EOS Utility 2.14 and use the controls provided on that application” My other concern is the DPP3 recipe file format “*.vrd” is not compatible with the new DPP4 file format “*.dr4”Decisions Decisions…Thank youhdevaneyYou may be in luck. New versions of DPP 4 and EOSU 3 came out this week. It's probably worth giving them a try.

  • Poll - Which Version Control Software Do You Use With LabVIEW?

    I wish the forums had a poll feature. I created a poll in the developer community - Which Version Control Software Do You Use With LabVIEW?
    http://decibel.ni.com/content/polls/1818
    Edit: I just saw that there already is a poll for that
    http://decibel.ni.com/content/polls/1050
    =====================
    LabVIEW 2012

    julieann wrote:
    You can use a source control provider to share files among multiple users, improve security and quality, and track changes to shared projects. Use LabVIEW with third-party source control providers so you can check out files and track changes from within LabVIEW. See info. here.
    Looks suspiciously like someone trying to increase hits on their blog. A coincidence that it was posted the same day as the blog post?
    Message has been reported to the moderator. Laura can decide whether or not it's appropriate.

  • Which version of Oracle 9i is better to work with 9iAS R2 ?

    Can Anyone tell me which version of Oracle 9i is certified to work with 9i Application Server release 2 ?
    Oracle 9i Release 9.0.1 or Oracle 9i Release 2 ?
    Thanks.

    Currently, Oracle9i Database Release 1 is the only one certified against Oracle9iAS Release 2. But Oracle9i Database Release 2 certification is partially completed (exceptions are Portal and Clickstream). We are working to complete the certification, so that Oracle9i DB Release 2 is fully certified against Oracle9iAS Release 2. I don't have an estimated date of completion.
    HTH,
    Ashesh Parekh
    Oracle9iAS Product Management

  • Which version of iMovie will work with OSX 10.6.3?

    Hi all,
    I am new to the world of Macs and have an older power mac to play with.
    I want to get iMovie, but cannot find a version that will work with OSX 10.6.3 on the app store, can anyone tell me which version will work with OSX 10.6.3, and where I might get it?
    Thanks

    Hej
    iMovie'11
    iMovie History 08, 09 & 11These are NOT AN EVOLUTION FROM Previous versions (iMovie 1 to HD6) but a totally new application.
    iMovie 08 (v7) 7.1.4 (aug 2007)
    • A new way of storing project and an event library as well
    • A totally new product in a pre-release state. Far from a working application.
    • Lacks even basal functions
    • No Speed-up or down or reverse
    • Lot’s of video-formats lacking
    • No cont. TimeLine - Bad logic
    • No good for interlaced SD-video from miniDV tape aimed to a DVD release.
    (Discarding every second line makes quality as VHS in LP or EP mode = BAD)
    • NO - Playback via Camera/FW - and this prevents 100% safety-backups and the use of an extra TV/Monitor as real-time Quality control (as in iM 1 to HD6)
    • Color tools got much BETTER - nearly usable - even sort of a copy function
    • Direct share to .Mac and YouTube
    • More Cameras supported even AVCHD (need of Intel CPU)
    • Do not run on G4 or older - G5 minimum
    • Need of 1.9 GHz G5-Mac,
    (Can run on 1.8GHz G5 iMac if installed on external boot hard disk and speedier Mac - can’t install directly)
    • Mac OS X.4.9 minimum
    • QuickTime 7.2 included
    Aimed at - speed editing small video projects to be presented on the Internet - NOT DVDs
    iMovie 09 (v8) 8.0.6 (jan 2009)
    • Far better than iMovie 08 but still far from good.
    • Pic in pic, green screen but rudimentary
    • Image stabilization - fairly good for amateur use
    • Speed-up/down and reverse
    • Bl/W, Old age etc
    • Still - No Continuos TimeLine
    • NO - Possibilities to enhance by use of third-part Plug-ins (all investments lost)
    • NO - Playback via Camera/FW - and this prevents 100% safety-backups and the use of an extra TV/Monitor as real-time Quality control (as in iM 1 to HD6)
    Aimed at - speed editing small video projects to be presented on the Internet - NOT DVDs
    iMovie 11 (v9) 9.0.x - 9.0.4 (2011 july)
    • Will be - Intel Only
    • Snow Leopard minimum Mac OS X.6.3
    YES
    • Advanced view including a true TimeLine ? Yes but rudimentary (very basic)
    • True Story-board - where You even can write and prepare space for lacking material that needs to be obtained or re-shoot. YES
    • Better wave-form presentation of audio and audio tools - Rubber-band - Yes
    • Trailer creating tool
    • ”Faces” as in iPhoto - NO - but this finds if there are people in some video-clips
    • Better audio tools. Equalizer and a background audio reducer
    • More Camera support e.g. 24fps
    NO
    • not 64-bit only
    • The Playback to Camera via FW - returns ? NO
    • Full Quality to iDVD - NO - still only half - every second line - Questionable - Some indicates it to be able to loss-less Exports - Has to be proven
    • Plug-in facility ? - NO
    • No free text tool
    • Tool to mask an identity e.g.. band over face or un-sharp area. - NO (could be obtained via Plug-ins in iM HD6 and earlier)
    • Animation tool - To point on interesting object/player - NO animations refer to a totally different
    thing connected to Story-board and insert of ”dummy animations” while building a movie
    Yours Bengt W

  • Which version of Adobe Photoshop works with OS X 10.8?

    I just switched from a Windows PC to a new iMac and I need to get another copy of Photoshop CS for Mac.  Does anyone one know which version(s) will work with OS X 10.8?  Thanks for your feedback - I don't want to spend a lot of money on the wrong version.

    Genuine Fractals is now Perfect Resize 7 Pro from onOne Software. 
    http://www.ononesoftware.com/support/3046/
    I hope this helps.
    Regards,
    peter

  • Which version of Adobe Acrobat works with Lion?  I am using Acrobat Standard 7.0

    I just upgraded to Lion and Acrobat Standard 7.0 will not work.  Which version of Acrobat do I need?  Can I upgrade or do I have to buy all over again?
    Thanks.
    Bill

    Did you ever find out?
    How did you upgrade?

  • Which version of photoshop will work with my laptop?

    Hi, I need to quickly brush up on basic skills of photoshop and was wondering which version would be compatable with my laptop?
    Here are my specs:
    Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 2
    System:
    Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
    Model: HP Pavilion dv4 Notebook PC
    Processor: Intel(R) Core (TM)2 Duo CPU T6500 @ 2.10 GHz
    Memory (RAM): 4.00 GB
    System type: 64-bit Operating system
    thanks!

    CS6
    Mylenium

  • Sun's JVM works better with AMD or Intel?

    Hi,
    I would appreciate if someone lets me know about
    what eventually works better or more friendly with Sun's JVM (JIT): the AMD CPUs or the Intel ones.
    It's a complex issue, I understand it, but I'd be glad to read some random opinions as anyway.
    It just seems to me that Sun's Java works (a bit) better with AMD, I tried an app
    on a x64 AMD of 1.8 Ghz and there was practically no difference
    in startup time (and execution) than a Pentium D at 3.4 Ghz (which has 2 cores) -
    I expected to see like a double increase in performance or so (yes - it doesn't only depend on the CPU).
    From the JavaOne 2008 conference (which I watched over the web) I have the impression that AMD is
    (much) more commited to improve the JVM to work fast with its chips than Intel (Intel was generally praising
    how Sun started selling servers with Intel chips).
    A link to an article/webcast/blog/analysis would be just great.
    Thanks in advance.

    xlinuks wrote:
    It just seems to me that Sun's Java works (a bit) better with AMD, I tried an app
    on a x64 AMD of 1.8 Ghz and there was practically no difference
    in startup time (and execution) than a Pentium D at 3.4 Ghz (which has 2 cores) -
    I expected to see like a double increase in performance or so (yes - it doesn't only depend on the CPU).Pentium Ds use Intel's Netburst architecture which is very difficult to get useful performance from for most loads.
    The more apt comparison would be with Woodcrest Xeons and later models. These should be roughly on par with AMD CPUs. There will be significant differences for some concurrent loads, but I doubt there's a consistent pattern where one CPU vendor is faster than the other.

  • Which of these accesories will work 100% with the iPod Nano?

    title about sums it, which will work with the ipod nano:
    Radio Remote
    http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?productLearnMore=MA0 70G/A
    AV Connection Kit
    http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?productLearnMore=MA2 42LL/A
    ALSO is the av kit overkill for the iPod Nano? The av cable looks like it would not work,no video from Ipod so what the point of a video cable? Also I am pretty sure it doesn't have an ir reciever for a wireless remote so what that part of the av kit be useless too?

    The a/v kit won't work with the nano. Specifically the v part. The audio and the rest will work, though.
    The radio remote works 100% with the nano.

Maybe you are looking for