Why are podcasts still downloading?

I noticed there was an issue with the last update (11.2.1) where podcasts were unexpectedly downloading. The new update (11.2.2) states that it "fixes a problem where certain podcast episodes may download unexpectedly after upgrading". However since installing the new update it has not seemed to have solved the problem. As soon as Itunes opened up again once the update was complete about 7 podcasts were downloading???

I wasnt intending to anyway looked a bit odd, thank you for the warning

Similar Messages

Why are you still selling iphone 4 when it dont work in your hand tryed a rubber sleeve and still no signal in my hand.

why are you still selling iphone 4 when it dont work in your hand tryed a rubber sleeve and still no signal in my hand.i think they should all be called back or given the iphone 5 free in its place.

http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/kolumnen/artikel/Die-geheimnisvolle-iPhone-Energie -1226682.html?view=zoom;zoom=1
Step 1: take an empty glass, put the iphone into the glass as shown in the picture.
Step 2: stare in disbelief about this BS really helping

I am trying to download the lastest apple ios update to my PC so I can update my ipad 2. Why are there no download buttons on the latest software updates?

I am trying to download the lastest apple ios update to my PC so I can update my ipad 2. Why are there no download buttons on the latest software updates?

Make sure all contents are transferred and device is backed up before you update.
Transfer purchases
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1848
How to backup
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1766

Why are the tv downloads from itunes so slow. what can i do to fix it?, why are the tv downloads from itunes so slow. what can i do to fix it?

Why are the TV downloads so slow? how can this be fixed?

If you start Activity Monitor with All Processes select and the CPU tab clicked
Then click the small arrow to the right of the % to sort the process using the most CPU to the top
If you tell us which processes they are and how much is being use we might be able to help you
Allan

I have uninstalled, downloaded latest and installed but it still doesn't work. Why are there still files leftover even after manually removal whatever I could?

I am a Windows 8.1 user. I have followed instructions found online. But still nothing works.
McAfee is still saying Firefox is untrusted and will not run it.
I have managed to delete some folders containing Firefox but there are some still remaining.
Why?
There was never a problem before today.

Hi, [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/uninstall-firefox-from-your-computer this article] will help you to completely remove Firefox.
You should ''only'' download Firefox from [https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ Mozilla.]
If McAfee is still not allowing it, you may need to look at the settings within McAfee.
Hope that helps.

Why are pre-order downloads delayed?

I pre-ordered Madonna's MDNA to get the single nearly two months ago. The album went on regular sale this morning, but it is still not possible to download the pre-order. Why are pre-order customers forced to wait when regular customers can download straight away? When am I going to be able to download the album? Really unimpressed with this iTunes.

Same problem!!! I have sent them an E-mail...really disapointed!! Grr!!
Good thing I also bought the CD i guess....
Still really cheesed off!!

Why are the songs downloaded from my computer grayed out and won't play?

Why are the songs that I downloaded from my pc not playing on my iphone and grayed out?

Hi sweatt,
Welcome to Apple Support Communities.
You may find these steps helpful for resolving the issue you're encountering:
iTunes Store: Troubleshooting iTunes Match
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts4054
Songs containing DRM (Digital Rights Management) may not appear, or may appear grayed out in iCloud. This can occur if your computer is not authorized for playback of that content. Try authorizing your computer, then manually update iTunes Match.
To determine what Apple ID your computer needs to be authorized for, locate and select the song in your iTunes library.
Choose File > Get Info.
In the Summary tab, locate the Account Name field in the right column and write it down.
Click OK.
Choose Store > Authorize this Computer.
Type in the account name from the Summary field and its password. Click Authorize.
Choose Store > Update iTunes Match.
Best,
Jeremy

Why are powerbooks still on apple's shelves?

why are the powerbook still being sold by Apple? Because they're emptying their shelves?
Or more interesting: Why would people buy a Powerbook?
I am just wondering because i am on the market to buy a laptop.
MBP are very expensive and Powerbook are not that cheap.
MBP or PB?
Any idea?

The Apple online store has not sold powerbooks (other than refurb's) since the various Intel laptops first appeared. And the retail store in Short Pump Va. hasn't had any powerbooks since shortly after the Intel machines hit the shelves.
In what Apple store have you seen new powerbooks for sale?
Macmall and other retailers still seem to have a few - and will have I suppose until thier inventory is gone. But, to my knowledge, Apple itself pulled them as soon as the respective Intel machine was available.

Why are My iTunes Downloads so Slow?

I have a 30 Mbps internet connection. When I run a speed test against my connection I almost always hit 30 Mbps. However, when I download podcasts and other files from iTunes my download speeds max out at just over 7 Mbps. I ran the diagnostics in iTunes and everything checked out fine. Any ideas on why I getting such a slow download speed?

Same experience here with anything being downloaded from Apple! For at least the last 5-6 months we have gone from very fast down loads from Apple Software Update Servers which were humming at around a Megabyte to 1.5 MB a second for the better part of the last DECADE! Which was fantastic and essential for upgrading dozens of computers on the many networks we manage. Now every single network for the last 5-6 months is only getting fractions of theses throughputs. Down to 30-80 KBs (Per Machine) which is a nightmare. It makes no difference geographically in Sydney or which Service provider. We have called the service providers and they have tested the pipe to Apples servers and they get the same results. We were comfortably getting 1GB downloads with in 20-40 minutes per machine with up to 5 or six machines on an ADSL 2+ connection at a time... easily, now its taking 3-4 hours to get a gigabyte per machine with only 2 or 3 computers at a time.
Its a nightmare and yes we use an in-house OSX Servers SUS and down load the big updates and distribute them internally but there are now so many different updates required for different machines its difficult to do this and we just upgraded 2 computers to Lion and they wanted to down load over 2.5GB in updates each with out the system software updates which we had previously downloaded. SUS on each computer was indicating just under 24 hours to down load 2.5 GB from Apple. We were able to down load this with in an hour previously.
Its become a nightmare harking back to the performance we were getting from the internet in the Nineties. It is suspected that since Apple removed their mirrors from around the world we all have to go to the States to get our Software, iOs and iTunes updates and Apples growth is impacting on their ability so serve up the bandwidth with everybody downloading ridiculously large 3.5 GB Lion installers.
Interestingly Microsoft servers are dishing up the same poor bandwidth performance as Apple yet Google is the same its always been at around 800-1MB a second and many other big companies blow the Apple servers out of the water on the same networks.
Something has to be done about this as our clients are beginning to complain seriously about it as its costing significantly more to run an Apple Network.
And no one from Apple wants to talk about it. And this post will most likely self destruct once Apple reads it!

Why are my .m4v downloads not playing correctly on QuickTime 7.0.4?

Can anyone out there help, please? I downloaded the Pixar shorts (.m4v format), which should only play on QuickTime. Except they aren't playing correctly: the picture is fine; the sound is stuttering and off-sync. BACKGROUND: I've got a mother of an Windows XP Pro animation system with DSL. I've tried all the QuickTime Preferences suggested on this website to no avail. Any other suggestions? Thank you.

I have a similar problem. When I try to play TV episodes that were downloaded (in .m4v format) using iTunes, QuickTime (7.0.4) will play video without audio, and when I press "stop", QuickTime locks up!
My system used to play these files PERFECTLY, until I downloaded some shareware video format conversion programs (that didn't work, anyway). I believe one of them installed a shared DLL or CODEC or something that is conflicting with QuickTime. I'VE UNINSTALLED AND REINSTALLED QUICKTIME AND ITUNES COUNTLESS TIMES, trying to follow different people's advice, mostly from posts on this site, but nothing helps!!
The thing we have in common is that it sounds like you also have other video software that could have conflicting CODECs or shared DLLs. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW TO TRACK THIS PROBLEM DOWN??
And why doesn't Apple make a CLEAN uninstaller and a COMPLETE installer? People shouldn't have to do the manual registry editing and file deletions that other people are recommending!!!!!
Intel 915 Mo Bd. 3.2GHz 1G RAM Windows XP

Why are my stills blurry?

Please help wise ones. I have a problem in my timeline, after I render my project (1 hour long), a lot of stills blurred or jumped, I have to find the original still, copy & then do a paste attributes to the ones that are in the timeline. Not all stills are blurred after rendering, please help me b/c I can't always see the flawed file until I watch the output. Has anyone had this problem? I thought it was a QT issue & updated, not it. The problems are random therefor hard to figure it out. Please help with your thoughts.
My project is using FCP6.05, I have a macbook pro, 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, and OSX 10.5.6

In your Stock do you have the explanation why Apple changed the "windows resolution so you could use macbook with an external broadcast"!
No. I don't know why Apple does what they do.
MacBook and external broadcast? Not possible, not with HD anyway. DV? Firewire out from computer to camera or DV bridge, to monitor. HD? Broadcast monitoring? Get a professional computer.
It he posted that he was working in a Macbook, let´s try to help him with other "could be" problems!
That IS the problem. I just addressed WHY it looks pixelated. Because FCP doesn't present the footage full quality in the Canvas...so you can get more RT and less (none hopefully) dropped frames. Want to know what it REALLY looks like? Need the pro gear and the proper monitoring. Can't even use the MXO on the MacBooks, can you? Or is there some adapter to get DVI out? IF so, that is the solution.
Shane

Why are people still using a browser that wants to censor any views with which it does not agree?

Mozilla drives out its CEO because he contributed $1000 to support a particular law in 2008 . Then it claims it values diversity. We all know that censors like Mozilla have NO place on the Internet --so PLEASE BOYCOTT MOZILLA --please fight for what little freedom we still have to hold differing views.

Hi FirstAmendment,
Thank you for contacting Mozilla about this issue and taking the time to share your thoughts.
The decision to step down was made by Brendan. Since the moment Brendan was appointed, free and open discussion has come from a diverse spectrum of viewpoints. Mozilla is an organization that believes in openness and that no one should be persecuted for the beliefs they hold, no matter what those beliefs are. We believe in unconditional freedom and openness. That's why we support rights for everyone.
As this is the Firefox support forum I can only help with questions related to the specific product. If you need more info about Mozilla's CEO you can check the resources below:
Mozilla Blog: https://blog.mozilla.org/ <br>
Brendan Eich's Blog: https://brendaneich.com/
If you have any issues with Firefox, please post a question at [/questions/new] and someone will assist you.

Why are we still getting IEEE 1394a • VIA VT 6308P chipsets????!!!!

Why is it we are still getting redundant IEEE 1394a controllers(400mb/s) on the latest motherboards rather than the newer IEEE 1394b controllers(800mb/s)? This is stupid... the 1394b ports have been around for more than 6 months, there are many supported devices for both a and b yet if you want to do b you still need an apple mac?
Is there some sort of compatability issue with the newer IEEE 1394b controller or are the "IBM Compatible" manufacturers just too lazy/cheap/stupid to start using it??? I want answers .... I wanted to buy the new P6N Diamond (running a K9N Diamond at the moment) motherboard but am hesitant because there is no IEEE 1394b controller and i have 3 "b" devices that may as well be USB2.0 for all the use they are in conjunction with MSI motherboards... I expected more from MSI with the X-fi and everything else that is included to find that a useful and at times essential piece of technology is left out for a cheaper controller for more profit? Am I going to be forced to go to an other manufacturer for my needs or is MSI going to satisfy a loyal customer of more than 8 years? I am also the IT Manager for a medium sized building company and purchase MSI product for our work machines .... I would be saddened if I was forced to find a more suitable manufacturer due to MSI's greed?

You should probably write a letter or send an email to MSI.
This is a user to user forum, MSI does not monitor this forum...
The board I purchased (975x Powerup) is an enthusiast board, generally speaking the users that purchase them are a finicky bunch. So if a motherboard doesn't support the exact graphics or sound that they require, they find one that does. Since yours is the first post that I have seen concerning IEEE 1394b support, it doesn't look to be a high priority for most users. Also, most of the MSI boards are very reasonably priced, and don't always include the latest toys. That is probably what keeps the price for these motherboards, so low.
I may be confused about this? But I thought the P6N Diamond is an AMD Nvidia board? If it is, your may want to post your question in that section.
Anyway, as I mentioned earlier, try writing to MSI about IEEE 1394b support, maybe they can explain why there is no support for it, or let you know when they will implement support.

Why are we still dependant on Camera Raw to get Smart Objects?

I've been a professional user of both Photoshop and Lightroom since they were created and feel that I'm either missing something simple or maybe just asking too much, but can someone from the engineering team please tell me why we still have to rely on Camera Raw plugins to open the file either directly or as a Smart Object into Photoshop?
It would seem to me that Lightroom should be able to handle the round-trip conversion from Lightroom files to Photoshop Smart Objects and any future edits back in Lightroom. The only reason I can honestly see for the reliance on Camera Raw is to keep us upgrading Photoshop - something I'm sure Adobe would like us to do on a regular basis but in the current economic climate is not always possible.
I want to keep updating Lightroom to ensure the best possible conversions for my clients but don't see why I have to keep upgrading Photoshop to keep Camera Raw up to date when CS5 does everything I currently does everything I currently need. Maybe I'll be proven wrong but I'm guessing this is the way we're heading with the release of Camera Raw 7 along with Lightroom 4. Please tell me if I'm wrong!

Jason Replica wrote:
Situation 2 - Current Situation
We have Photoshop and compatible versions of Camera Raw and Lightroom installed.
I can open a raw image from Lightroom into Photoshop using the "Open in Photoshop as Smart Object" option.
This works fine but when I double-click on the Smart Object it opens back in Camera Raw for editing.
I'd always presumed that Lightroom carried out the conversion rather than Camera Raw in this situation before handing off the data to Photoshop to form the Smart Object. Have I been incorrect in my presumption?
That's where your assumption was wrong...as long as LR & ACR is in lockstep, LR hands off the image to ACR. An ACR Smart Object needs to use ACR to allow editing of the SO. That is a function of ACR and Photoshop. Lightroom can't do a SO because, well, SO's are a function of Photoshop, not Lightroom.
Jason Replica wrote:
Situation 3 - Future Situation - Maybe??
We have Photoshop and Lightroom installed.
I can open a raw image from Lightroom into Photoshop using the "Open in Photoshop as Smart Object" option.
This doesn't rely on Camera Raw to hand-off the data to Photoshop and form the Smart Object as Lightroom is capable of the same type of conversion on it's own. Double-clicking on the Smart Object should then re-open the image in Lightroom (as that's where it came from originally) and allow all the editing that we've come to expect in Lightroom.
Ain't gonna happen because Lightroom can't handle the Photoshop Smart Object SDK...and since the actual rendering of ACR/LR is the same (for the same version) it's a moot point.
Jason Replica wrote:
Ignoring the economics of having to update Photoshop as I know Adobe (and probably Jeff as well ) would like us all to be running the latest version of Photoshop and payout for the updates as soon as they come around, I would think this would be a more sensible option for the future as it would allow more people to keep their existing version of Photoshop, which they've tweaked, wrote actions for and is working very nicely at the moment thankyou while exploring the benefits of the new-and-improved Lightroom.
I really don't have a dog in this hunt–obviously, I always upgrade the moment an upgrade is available...but there are technical limitations (see above) that preclude what you think you want. As far as the economics, a $99 LR upgrade and a $199 Photoshop upgrade ever two years doesn't seem to be a huge hurdle. Add up the LR & PS upgrades and you get a cost of about $12.50/month over the 24 months...yes, it's an added cost but if you want the best user experience and usability it makes sense to keep LR & Photoshop/ACR in sync. You aren't FORCED to upgrade Photoshop...LR4 will work as far back as Photoshop CS3 (not sure about CS2). But then you are locked into the LR processed approach because older versions of ACR can't process the newer versions of LR processing controls.

Why are text tones downloaded as ring tones?

I purchased 2 what I thought were text tones for my iphone. However, they were downloaded to my ringtones. I do NOT want ringtones that say "You have a text". That's just dumb. Not sure why they would even put those in the ringtone options. Is there any way to move them on my phone? If not, I just wasted my money. (Spent an hour trying to find help on apple/itune website. Not user friendly!)

There are no customized text tones at the moment.
ONLY ringtones.
You CANNOT customize text tones at all. There are NO text tones other than the standard ones. None. At all.

Why are podcasts still downloading?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for