Why did Apple drop support on Windows XP 64-bit, but not on 32-bit?

I have Windows XP 64-bit and do not feel the need to get a new computer or upgrade the operating system. What I wonder is why Apple still makes iTunes for 32-bit XP and not 64-bit XP?

Not sure why you would expect anyone here to know the exact answer to your question considering none of us work for Apple, but it's probably because 1. XP64 is horrible. 2. It's user base is and always has been low. 3. XP64 was no doubt geard toward corporations, while XP32 and iTunes are consumer oriented versions.

Similar Messages

Why did apple stop supporting disc installed video games in their macs

I was wondering why did apple support disc installed games like spore on older macs but they wont install on the newer macs. This is really bothering me because i like disc installed videos games they are safer and you have to purchase them in order to play them unless you have a crack. Now apple is saying that discs are obsolete when really they aren't.

These are user-to-user forums where everyday folk (volunteers) post questions and offer answers (technical support) to each other.None of us users take part in any of Apple's decisions and/or why they do the things that do. Your best bet would be to post your concerns over on the Product Feedback website.

When and Why Did Apple Drop The 160GB Classic Ipod

Hi
I was going to go and finally buy a 160GB Ipod tomrrow.I see they don't even list it anymore on Apples site and Future-shop doesn't even list it on the site.
They only make a 120GB Now
When Did they Drop this and why???
Also Do any stores still have them in Stock???
I won't be spending the money on only a 120GB if thats all they make now
I've had my Ipod Mini 4GB since 2005 and thought it was time for a upgrade.
Please do tell me if Apple still makes the 160GB Ipod
thanks

Apple has discontinued the 160GB. You can buy one online still, but not from Apple. Or buy a used one off Craig's List.
P.S. Actually Apple is still selling refurbished 160GB on it's site, if you want to go that route. I also found some new ones on Amazon. Buy.com may have some too.
Message was edited by: iPodDiva

Why did apple drop NBC?

NBC has so many great shows. Now you can only get NBC shows from Amazon.com, who doesn't support the mac or the ipod. Itunes would be so much better with every TV show. *I want NBC content back!!!*

To add on To Deb, NBC was also reportedly interested in getting a percentage in iPod sales - another thing that Apple would not be happy with.
Anyway, NBC opened HULU after dropping Apple. Not compatible with the iPod and requires internet connection which made me say no.

Why did Apple drop iDVD?

It appears that Apple has dropped iDVD reasoning that "most" people share movies via the web. This is not correct. Anyone with a robust home movie library, developed over the years (such as with children), can tell you there is no way any web service such as YouTube and others can house such a library of this size. The web is fleeting. Home movies (on DVD) are meant to be permanent. This is a terrible decision on the part of Apple.
Is anyone aware of any negative feedback Apple has received or any Apple considerations for brining the product back?
The ability to use "chapter markers" in iMovie for easy forwarding by chapter in iDVD was a really nice feature. The loss of connectivity between iMovie and iDVD results in a loss of this important feature, even if you do determine a way to import a current iMovie file into an older version if iDVD.

It appears that Apple has dropped iDVD reasoning that "most" people share movies via the web. This is not correct.
That is not why Apple is moving away from optical media.   Apple is the largest media company in the world. They sell nothing on disk. It is to their financial advantage to have the physical possession of movies go away. ( but I fail to see how it benefits the consumer. )
Apple wants users to buy the Apple TV stuff and online content. Apple and other media companies, want to get rid of the physical media so they can promote the online streaming business even more. The game and movie industry is huge. Without a physical media, you won't be able to buy used CDs, Movies, or games anymore. The DVD and CD era is not over.
Another factor that is often overlooked is people's innate desire to hold something tangible in their hands; to build a library of films.   There's definitely a psychological component to the accumulation of material goods, and I always get more of a rush from receiving a Blu-ray in the post than I do from streaming or downloading a film.
I have Netflix, and it is great for TV shows but I love owning a library of films on my shelves.
I strongly recommend that you leave feedback for Apple on the link provided above (be nice).   Moreover, iDVD works perfectly with all of Apple's latest hardware and software. iDVD is tested with the latest hardware and software. Continue to use iDVD.

Why did apple stop supporting iPod touch 4, Why did apple stop supporting iPod touch 4

I was really excited for iOS 7 to come out and then I couldn't get I on my iPod touch 4. The iOS 6.1.5 came out for it I thought the might make it for the 4. Does anybody know if they might recontinue it?

As Apple said in June, iOS 7 is not compatible with the 4G iPod.
All the iOS devices compatible (iPhone 4 and later, iPad 2 and later, and 5G iPod touch) with iOS 7 have at least 512 MB of memory (RAM). The 4G iPod only has 256 MB

HT4759 Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?

Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?

chewy cabeza wrote:
Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?
From your point of view and the framing of your question, Apple does indeed support WIndows better than Mac for the limited issue of iCloud.
chewy cabeza wrote:
...YET, Leopard and Snow Leopard are NOT iCloud compatible. How can that be justified? Obviously, Apple can make iCloud available to Snow Leopard, but disdains us...
Historically speaking, Apple has rarely gone backwards in its OS development. Once they have released a new OS with new technology, I can only think of one example of when they backtracked: They released TrueType technology in System 7 and then released System 6.0.8, which included TrueType technology for continuing System 6 users.
So it is part of their culture to move forward and not backwards. Other examples:
• Inclusion of the then novel SONY 3.5" disk drive in its release of the first Macintosh (and not the industry standard 5.25" drive); after its use in the Lisa and adoption for the Apple II series of computers.
• Elimination of the floppy drive completely in the release of the first iMac.
• Use of then novel AAC audio compression as "state of the art" compression for the iPod release in 2001 instead of the outdated mp3 standard.
• Refusal to allow use of FLASH in iPod Touch/iPhone/iPads.
How could they justify these decisions? The marketplace justified them for Apple!
So, yes, they could release 10.6.9 with iCloud support. But why now, if not then?

Why did Apple take MIDI support out of QuickTime 10?

MIDI may not be a prevalent standard, but there's still quite a lot of music written in it. Why would Apple drop it? It seems like a giant departure away from Apple's usual philosophy of "everything just works." If I wanted to use an OS where I had to download an entire application every time I needed a new CODEC, I'd still be using Windows! This was just a bad idea.

Understood, but that seems kludgy and seems to fly in the face of the entire Apple "simplify" philosophy. There's no reason for Apple to drop a standard that encompasses billions of existing files. The whole point of MacOS and iOS is that they just work.

Why did Apple make iTunes 7 look like a Windows XP App.?

Why did Apple make iTunes 7 look like a Windows XP App.? This version of iTunes doesn't even look like it belongs in OSX. It's ugly is about the only way I can put it. I can't figgure out why they removed the EQ icon and didn't even assign a key command for it. Now yoy have to go into the menu to select it. Also I have noticed that it sometimes downloads the wrong artwork for album covers. The old version of iTunes seemed much better and I have reverted back to it untill Apple fixes the problems with version 7 and makes it look like part of the OSX family of applications.

Well I wouldn't say it was ugly but some changes do leave something to be desired.
I certainly aggree about the equaliser button and the visualiser button has gone too but at least they assigned a key command for it. The scrollbars need more colour and I'd prefer the buttons at the bottom to stand out a bit more like the ones at the top.
I see no reason to go back to iT6 though, especially as I would misss Cover Flow. You could have a long wait for a change of interface and in the meantime you miss out on the good parts of iT7. If your track information is correct and identical to that on the Store then it shouldn't get the wrong artwork. Luckily I already had most of my album covers in place from other sources such as Amazon and just used iTunes to get a few more. My only complaint about the Get Album Artwork feature is that it's getting it from the US store when I want it from the UK store.
Anyway these forums are really here to enable users to help each other solve problems and not to discuss Apple's decisions. If there are things you want changing then do what I and others do and send constructive criticisms and requests via the link below, if you haven't already.
http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html

Why did I have to enable Windows File Sharing to share files between two Mavericks iMacs?

File Sharing failed between my Mavericks iMacs. The console logs showed that the target iMac saw the ntlmv2 protocol as unknown to the kdc. I fixed it by enabling Windows File Sharing on the target Mavericks iMac. I had tried disabling SMB on both iMacs and leaving AFP on, but then nothing happened when I tried to connect. Why did I have to enable Windows File Sharing to share files between two Mavericks iMacs?

When you enable file sharing you need to have either SMB (Windows) or AFP (historically Apple-native) file sharing checked. The default in Mavericks is SMB, and not AFP.
If you uncheck both, then the system will turn off file sharing. Apple supports the use of both SMB and AFP connections in Mavericks, so with only AFP enabled you should have been able to establish a connection, but there could be a small bug or configuration-specific snafu that you're encountering.
With AFP enabled only, try pressing Command-K in the Finder to open the Connect To Server dialogue, and in here enter the address to the system using afp:// as the protocol, such as the following (the name can be looked up in the Sharing system preferences):
afp://my_imac.local

Why does apple only support mp4 videos?

It's not really a problem, i usually use my friends computers to convert my videos since mine is so slow.
But why does apple only support MP4 and MOV formats? Why not MPEG or DivX?
I know they cannot use WMV because it is a Microsoft format.
It's just sometimes when i convert videos, the audio becomes out of sync or iTunes complains it's not playable on my iPod.
I would just like to know why?
Thanks for your time.

If Apple chooses to go with H.264 or MP4 or whatever else they want to support, maybe it would be real nice if iTunes could automatically convert to those formats. So if I dropped my universally standard (and supported by most DVD players) DivX video clip in the library, iTunes would convert and format the video to an iPod friendly format.
So, let me see if I understand this correctly. You want Apple to pirate proprietary codecs from DivX and build them into iTunes QT access. Tell me, does this mean that Apple is working as your agent and you will be the one spending time behind bars or paying the fines. Or, are you saying that Apple should act as an agent for DivX and charge you for a version of iTunes with legal codecs installed. How about Windows Media? Want to double the cost? What about Real? Or maybe Apple should have different versions of iTunes -- one for you and one for the guy who lives next door who uses old Indeo files?
I have tried several 3rd party converters and they all suck.
Perhaps you should be more selective in choosing a converter or invest in a commercial product which is supported by the people selling it.

Why did Apple discontinue iPhoto for iOS?

Why did Apple discontinue iPhoto for iOS?
This app offered great features such as the ability to format your pictures and journal and, add comments and context.
It's disappointing to be forced to migrate away especially when this is a paid app ($4.99). Many other companies may stop supporting paid apps, but at least you can still use the apps.

Apple did not say why, so we can only speculate.
But have a look at what has changed in iOS 8. http://www.apple.com/ios/developer/
The basic frameworks, that support image editing apps and any graphics apps have been completely replaced by newer frameworks, for example PhotoKit. Also, the Photos.app and its library are very different, with the Camera Roll being replaced by the "Recent Activity" album.
iPhoto used "Photos" to access all photos on the device and did not them separately. The code would have needed to be completely rewritten. Probably, Apple did not want to develop iPhoto a second time, in addition to the new "Photos", but is relying on the third party developers to supplement Photos with extensions:
PhotoKit
Developers can enable their photo apps to edit photos directly in the Camera Roll without having to import them first.
Photo Editing
Developers can embed their filters and editing tools directly into the Photos app. So you could apply third‑party effects to images without leaving the app where you view your photos.

HT1771 why did apple erase ichat? its so much better than messages and now I cant video chat with my ichat buddies

why did apple erase ichat? its so much better than messages and now I cant video chat with my ichat buddies!!!

HI,
Apple did not erase iChat.
Messages in Mountain Lion is iChat +
The plus bit is the fact you can iMessage iOS devices.
All the other features that were in iChat are still there.
If you upgraded Lion to get to Mountain Lion then in System Preferences > Mail, Contacts and Calendars you probably list all the iChat Accounts (Screen Names and IDs).
You may need to enable them for Messages.
They should also show up in Messages Menu > Preference > Accounts
Once those accounts (AIM and Jabber) are Enabled they can be viewed in a Combined Buddy List
Windows Menu > Buddies (Or using CMD + 1 Keystrokes)
In the General Section of the Preferences you can Unlink these Buddy lists.
The Green icons or highlight a Buddy and then using the Buddies Menu or the icons at the Bottom of the Buddy list can be used the same way to start Video or Audio Only chats.
The iMessage "Account" is only for texting iOS devices or other people using their Apple ID on a Mac in Messages.
It is an account "in addition to" rather than "taking over from" the services that iChat can join.
9:22 PM Thursday; December 6, 2012
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
 iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Mountain Lion 10.8.2)
 G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
 MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
 Mac OS X (10.6.8),
 Couple of iPhones and an iPad
"Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously

Why did Apple exclude Intel Core Duo Macbook from Lion compatibility?

I own Macbook with Intel Core Duo. I just discovered that I cannot install OSX 10.7 (Lion) on this Macbook. Why did Apple exclude this system?

Some MacMini 1.83s had Intel Core 2 Duo's, are you sure about that being a Core Duo?
OVERVIEW
Introduced
August 2007
Discontinued
March 2009
Model Identifier
Macmini2,1
Model Number
A1176
Order Number
MB138LL/A (1.83 GHz), MB139LL/A (2.0 GHz)
Initial Price
$599 (1.83 GHz) $799 (2.0 GHz)
Support Status
Supported
Weight and Dimensions
2.9 lbs., 2" H x 6.5" W x 6.5" D
PROCESSOR
Processor
Intel Core 2 Duo (T5600, T7200) ("Merom")
Processor Speed
1.83 or 2.0 GHz
Architecture
64-bit
Number of Cores
2
Cache
2 MB (1.83 GHz) 4 MB (2.0 GHz) shared
System Bus
667 MHz
STORAGE AND MEDIA
Storage
80 (1.83 GHz only), 120, or 160 GB 5400-rpm
Media
Slot-loading Combo drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW) or Slot-loading SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)

Lanyard headphones: why did apple discontinue them for ipod nano?

i'd love to purchase the new generation of ipod nano (i need more HD space on my 2nd gen ipod nano), but i have a basic need for the lanyard style headphones. i can't bring myself to wear the old style headphones (i have many bad memories of dropping the lanyard-less ipods).
i have never had a problem with the lanyard design in the 4+ years that i've used them. why did apple stop production?
and, more importantly, does apple have any plans to bring back lanyard headphones in the future?
thank you.

Since we are all end users like you, nobody here would have the answers to such questions. Only apple knows. Either way, I suggest you leave feedback to Apple through one of their feedback channels.
Apple -> Product Feedback
B-rock

Why did Apple drop support on Windows XP 64-bit, but not on 32-bit?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for