Why did I need to install Google Crome

Because I wanted a modern browser on Windows Server 2008. Microsoft will only allow IE 9 and that browser will not display modern web sites.
I just don't understand why ... what is the thinking process at Microsoft.
Let me say it again. I HAD to install Crome.

See if anything here helps,
Tweaks for Internet explorer
Post a link t the site where you had issues,
I can't say If ever had an issue with any websites ?
Cheers.

Similar Messages

Why do we need to install java during sap installation

why do we install Java during SAP installation?

Hello Satish,
Sapinst tool requires JRE for the running and as JRE cannot be integrated to sapinst due to licensing issues we need to install seprately java before sap installation.
Hope this clarifies your query.
Thansk and Regards,
-Bijesh.

Why do callers need to install "whistle"?

I cannot reproduce this myself. But I have an online number from Skype, and I've verified that it works at least from my land line: when I run Skype on my Android phone, and dial my online number from my land line, I hear a ringing sound from the land line (just as if I'd called any other number), and my Android phone vibrates and displays a Skype screen that tells me that there's an incoming call. This is all exactly what I'd expect.
However, the one other person who has ever tried to call my Skype number says that he doesn't hear a ringing sound, but instead gets a recorded voice telling him that he needs to install something called "Whistle" on his computer. This makes no sense to me, as his phone isn't connected to his computer in any way that I know of.
Can anyone explain this?

Which version of Java do you already have installed?
Java 1.6.0_12 or higher?

Why did the new Ffox install in \Apps\Data\ instead of \Program Files\? what a mess.

Using XP, I had reservations about upgrading, but Ffox Help refused to allow questions about upgrading, until I did :-(
Instead of replacing the existing installation, it added a second, messing up my start menu, which still runs the older version.
But the new version has disabled without explanation or advice, about half of my extensions/add-ons/plug-ins, including AVG, my security program.
In addition, the Add-ons Mgr >> More links just take me stupidly to the AVG website with no clue what the problem is, nor how to describe my compatibility need to vendor. (Mozilla probably knows the problem with each estranged vendor, but did not choose to pass that on in the error message.)
In addition, the Ffox page that brought me (Add-ons disabled by upgrade) to 'ask a question', indicated (by offering to install 3.6), that all of this hassle was known before I was forced into it, and I should have known by telepathy that 7.01 was all an avoidable mistake if Mozilla had allowed my question without requiring me to install 7 first ;-( {I know you are sorry. Please open the upgrade problems page if you value your reputation for intelligence.}

Thank you for your prompt reply.
I am a little confused. I thought it was not supposed to install without Admin priv., which should have required Admin. or not installed at all. (sigh)
The whole Add-on, Extension, Plug-in thing seems a bit complex, but I now gather that Add-ons are adverts for additional software, & there is an Add-on Manager that also handles Extensions & plug-ins (difference?). Half of my dozen extensions are disabled, and won't update. A third of my 2 dozen plug-ins are up-to-date, 2 thirds requiring messy research to even determine if they are supported any more (?).
Would it help for me to uninstall either 7 or 3.6 or both under Admin user login?
And since I have doubts of the usefulness of many of these add-ons, will I have to do all the Mozilla research before I uninstall 7, to avoid getting locked out of the forum again? (or is there a way around that website problem? or perhaps leave 7 installed, but for AVG safety reasons just use the 3.6 for now?)
Is there a comparison list of 3.6 & 7 features I have not been able to find?
(Perhaps I can just uninstall 7 and forget it for now.)

Why did my macbook start installing while I was shutting down?

I was trying to shut my macbook down and it began to do so, but suddenly you could see a transparent window show up that had an install bar initiate. My macbook then installed an unknown update that I did not initiate. I was not in update software at all before I shut down. I closed my Microsoft Word application and then I shut it down. I checked the Console and there was activity during this time that I don't understand, but can post info on if someone knows how to decipher it.
I am concerned that my macbook installed some type of malicious software by itself.
I am always cautious to what emails I open etc, so I don't know why it did that.

Hold the power button and the system will eventually shutdown (uncleanly). My MacBook freezes from time to time while watching Netflix (4 times in 2 years). I wouldn't worry about unless it's happening all the time.

Why is Flash player installation installing Google Chrome and a Google add on?

Perhaps I didn't see that some other items were checked before I clicked the install button for new Flash player plugin, but I'm very annoyed that it started installing Chrome and another Google add-on without asking me. I as able to quickly cancel the installation before they were installed. What's up with this? If I wanted Google products installed, I'll go to to Google's website and install them. I don't need Adobe sneaking extra stuff in.

Use the FULL installers:
Flash Player for ActiveX (Internet Explorer)
Flash Player Plug-in (All other browsers)
Nothing is ever bundled with those.

Why do i need three? - Google Talk Plugin, Google talk plugin video renderer and Google talk plugin video accelerator?

When I check my plugins, the following three, very closely related (in my mind) plugins are listed, and the "Renderer" still shows "Research" when checking to see if it is Up-To-Date. It seems to me I don't need all three. I tried removing the Renderer (yes, I know how to do that safely), but Google seems to continue to reinstall it (with one or both of the other two...?)...I'll ask this on a Google Forum too, since it's their product, but wondered if anyone has any insight. I obsess about plugins that need "Research" - Thanks!
Google Talk Plugin Video Accelerator version:0.1.44.24
Google Talk Plugin Version 3.15.2.12038
Google Talk Plugin Video Renderer Version 3.15.2.12038

Went to Google Talk Help and found advice to remove the "googletalkplugin_port file on [my] computer."
http://support.google.com/chat/bin/static.py?hl=en&page=known_issues.cs ... and click "Voice and video plug-in unrecognized" under "Currently Known Issues"....
Now, the only Google Talk plugin I have in Firefox is
Google Talk Plugin Video Renderer
Version 3.15.2.12038
...but it does indeed remain "Unrecognized" by Mozilla/Firefox...

Why do I need to install RSAT on Windows 8.1 for accessing Hyper-V Server 2012 R2?

Since Windows 8.1 has Hyper-V Platform and Hyper-V Manager built in to it, if I just enable the Hyper-V Manager on my Windows 8.1 client machine I should be able to access the standalone Hyper-V Server 2012 R2 (which I'm planning to install on my 2nd machine)
right?
Then why every article I found on this suggests to install RSAT on my client machine?

Hi Nero,
RSAT is used for these server/client can not enable hyper-v role to manage the corresponding hyper-v server .
Please refer to following supported OS list of
client hyper-v :
Windows 8 Pro 64-bit Edition
Windows 8 Enterprise 64-bit Edition
Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit Edition
Windows 8.1 Enterprise 64-bit Edition
Best Regards
Elton JI
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Why did photoshop cc 2014 install separately so i lost all my plugins installations ?

hallo,
i have installed photoshop cc on desktop and laptop and when cc 2014 came, instead of replacing previous one, it made a separate app.
so i needed to reinstall lot of plugins (topazlabs, niksoftware, ononesoftware, alienskinsoftware,...
br
marc

It works as it is designed and as it always has in the past - major new versions always installed separately for a million reasons.
Mylenium

Why do I need to install Office a second time?

I have a Mac 27' and its great! I love it lol but I have a little problem. I've installed Microsoft office 365 on my computer and my brother made another account for the house to keep separate from his account. When I go to the house account I have to "re-install' Office even though i have already installed it the first time.. I'm just wondering why i have to installed it again after i have already installed it the first time.

Ask Microsoft. Their requirement, not Apple's.
Microsoft Support

Why do I need to install Lion again?

This is an odd one.. I have tried to search the support communities to see if anyone else is having the same problem but cant find it so this could be an isolated case... Anyway....
I have just updated my Lion OSX to the latest version 10.7.3 through the Mac app store - while it was downloading and to kill a bit of time while it was downloading I clicked onto the 'Purchased' tab to have a browse at my previous purchases and noticed that it was asking me to download the full version of Lion again!!.. The 4GB version... Has anyone else noticed this in their purchase tab? - I have checked the other Macs I have in case it was just the machine I was working on but all of them are saying the something. Appreciate your comments back before I download it again... Maybe its just a glitch in the app store but wanted to check if anyone else has had the same message. Thanks.

UPDATE... Gone onto the mac store today and now in the purchase tab Lion has been removed so looks like I have not even purchased it... I did a search for it in the store and instead of saying "Installed" - its giving me the selling price... Just like it does when you first purchase the software!!
What's going on?... HELP!!!

Why did firefox attempt to install some kind of computer improvement software

received message that there was a new browser version and the download was NOT an update to Firefox. It was some kind of computer cleaner/speeder upper and I caught and cancelled the INSTALL not UPDATE

Deceptive messages about downloads being Firefox updates can be generated by websites or by add-ons. If this was a one-time thing, it may have been an ad on a site you were visiting. If it occurs repeatedly, you probably need to check for a bad extension or malware.
Bad extensions often are installed externally to Firefox. I suggest starting here:
Open the Windows '''Control Panel''', Uninstall a Program. Click the "Installed on" column heading to group the infections, I mean, additions, by date. This can help in smoking out undisclosed bundle items that snuck in with some software you agreed to install. Take out as much trash as possible here.
Then, in Firefox, open the '''Add-ons page''' using either:
* Ctrl+Shift+a
* "3-bar" menu button (or Tools menu) > Add-ons
In the left column, click Extensions. Then, if in doubt, disable (or Remove, if possible) unrecognized and unwanted extensions.
Often a link will appear above at least one disabled extension to restart Firefox. You can complete your work on the tab and click one of the links as the last step.
Finally, you can "mop up" remaining issues with the scanning/cleaning tools listed in our support article: [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]].
Hopefully you can flush it.

Why did the lettering on the google page suddenly become magnified?

I was working on my computer and suddenly the firefox/google page became very large. How do I reduce the image on my computer? I have a macbook pro.

You're welcome.
Please click the '''Solved It''' button next to the answer that solved your Firefox support issue, '''''it appears when you are logged in''''', so this thread gets marked as '''Solved''' to help other users who may have this same problem.

Why did I can not install Photoshop CS6?

Configuration error
   Please uninstall and reinstall the product.
   If this problem still occurs, please contact Adobe technical support for help, and mention the error code shown at the bottom of this screen.
   Error: 16
   http://www.adobe.com/support/

Error 16 : Creative Suite Help / Configuration error 16 | CC, CS : http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/configuration-error-cs5.html

Tilting screen gives better colour matching with print why did I need spyder pro?

OK, that was not a serious comment but there is truth here, and it should not be?
Equipment:
Imac 10.4.11
Photoshop CS3
Canon printer
monitor callibrated with Spyder 3 Pro
Colour management policy accurate in theory,
Working space same as camera space same as embedded profiles from Raw.Adobe RGB1998,
working in 16 bit, minor adjustments in raw, and CS3.
paper used - Photo Paper Plus Glossy (PP101)
Printer profile set to SP2 (same as semi gloss unfortunatley)
Detailed setting used in apple print dialogue to highest which is 2 unfortunately, not 1.
Screen is set to Soft proof before print for above paper.
PROBLEM:
1. Blues and Greens always less saturated than screen
2. Prints generally slightly darker, This is problem with grays and shadows being darker than screen.
3. Oranges less saturated
4. Colours often, in general, are bland and lack the impact that I see even in the soft proof.
QUESTION:
What could be going wrong? I have used the channel mixer to compensate for colours, but this I was doing before i bought the spyder3 Pro. I should not have to do this. Does the printer convert on the fly a 16 bit data image to 8 bit, because I never convert before sending to the printer? In windows my printer shows the option to print using Adobe RGB 1998. But in my Mac I do not see this option, could it be that the printer is using s'RGB regardless of what CS3 sends to it?
I have been struggling with these issues for a few weeks now and can find no solution. EXCEPT, that when i tilt my LCD monitor upwards I get better colour accuracy, the darker parts of images are more in line with the photo. YET, i have profiled the monitor at least 15 times over the past 2 weeks.
I am Lost. Can anywhere help please?
thankyou, Chris.

Chris wrote:
>But as with marketing campaigns and advertising policies, maybe it is time for the "Teachers and lecturers" in this industry to make this point more clearly.
Yes, they certainly should emphasize how quality and the means to achieve it are also tied to better equipment. It's also necessary that the users become more competent, of course, but the quality of the materials and equipment is just as crucial in order to achieve quality results.
>It is only something that I am beginning to realise. for me a monitor was a monitor. The way that colour management hardware manufacturers talk is therefore un-balanced.
They do their bit, which also includes the necessary evils of hype and marketing. It's *our* job not to fall for the inflated claims and the manufactured enthusiasm -- to ask around, read the reviews and understand how to interpret the specs. NEVER buy ANYTHING just based on the say-so of the manufacturer!
>The way that Pantone and makers of colour cards rant on about colour is also un-balanced. What they should be adding is ....with a proper monitor designed for photos these products will work??
The matching of spot colors on a monitor display is a tricky business in itself. Of the 1100 or so colors in the Pantone Coated palette, about 140 are more than 3 DeltaE 2000 outside of the gamut of sRGB (using Relative Colorimetric) and about 185 are more than 2 DeltaE 2000 off. The peak color difference is at 13 DeltaE.
But many of the monitors out there don't even cover sRGB, which is a relatively small color space. My Apple Studio Display has a gamut 15% *smaller* than sRGB, for example: more than 200 of the Pantone coated colors are 3 DeltaE 2000 or more outside its gamut (with a peak at 11.4 DeltaE), and 265 are off by 2 DeltaE or more.
On the other hand, the newer higher-end displays from Eizo and NEC-Mitsubishi (and others too from Samsung and HP) cover gamuts that are far wider, enough to cover AdobeRGB or larger.
Only 35 Pantone coated colors are outside AdobeRGB by 3 DeltaE 2000 or more, and 65 by 2 DeltaE 2000 or more (the highest color difference is a much more moderate 6.2 DeltaE).
Not perfect, but a much better situation -- all due to using a better monitor (which, yes, is also more expensive).

Why did I need to install Google Crome

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for