Why do FONTS, drawRECT & drawCIRCLE Classes look so bad in iOS?

Hello, these look great on PC and MAC deployments. But they are from Adobe standard of rich graphcs that I am used to? It must be what i am doing wrong.
Here are some screen shots off iPAD. The triangles are blown up. but you get the iodea. look at my circles on bottom image. So not clean. Do I need to do more to draw classes? I will post code shortly.
Do I need to move to a framework then in FLEX to get better graphics? Or maybe I need to use starling I hear alot about that. And, can I use typekit with actionscript?
Sorry I am not the coder just the deigner. My code team can not fix. They don't know the problem.
Thanks

Hi and again thanks for your input! Attached is the actionscript code that is making wobbly circles. So, without implenmenting bitmaps how do I make the circles round using actionscript code.
And again, thank you.
Ivan

Similar Messages

Why do fonts and vector images look broken in Acrobat Pro (on retina display)

I often get scared of doing something horribly wrong every time I export to PDF from Indesign CC. I know I didn't mess up but my scariness is the effect of the terrible graphic support in Acrobat when viewing the pdf's. Fonts and Vector images look broken and the look of fonts only gets better after zooming in at an incredible 6400% ! Are my preference settings in Acrobat wrong or is it because Acrobat doesn't support Retina yet?

Moving this discussion to the Acrobat Installation & Update Issues forum.

Why does my exported mp4 file look so bad when it is viewed in adobe acrobat pdf file?

I have embedded an mp4 (exported from premier pro cs6) video file into adobe acrobat and its not sharp viewing of my video anymore. It was a sharp video when viewed in both premier and the exported mp4 files, but once embedded in acrobat it looses sharpness, anyone know what the problem might be? Could my settings in adobe acrobat be wrong? I would think the problem is in adobe acrobat since the exported mp4 video views crisp and clear before its embedded, any ideas to assure sharpness with my video after its embedded into the adobe acrobat pdf?
Hoping someone has an answer to this, I think my problem might lie within the adobe acrobat settings????
or maybe there is no way around and I need to expect this video not to look as crisp and clear after I embed it into acrobat.... as it is when viewing in premier pro, mp4, etc.????
Any helpful information would be greatly appreciated.
Someone Im sure is taking theri exported premier files and embedding them to create pdf files? Would love to hear if anyone has encountered this issue.
Thanks so much in advance for any help offered.

Hi Dave,
I just completed a test and comparison between the two PDF's,
compared the file as you suggested with the floating option and changing setting to actual size of the original premier pro / mp4 file size and
the old pdf that did not utilize the floating and file size option.
I do notice a slight difference. The PDF with the floating window with the match of the media clips original dimensions appears to be crisper.
I will be having the final pdf document set utilizing this method for the embeded mp4 movie and hope that the department doing this (next stage of this job) will agree that this is better to use your steps to embed all the video files into a pdf.
Thanks so much for your time.
Hope you had a happy holiday, and hope you have a very happy and healthy new year.
Thanks, Amy

Why do my slow motion clips look so bad in iDVD6?

I'm not sure if this is an iMOVIE or iDVD issue but when I burn DVDs the slow motion sections look really jittery; much worse than they were in my movies that were made from the programs I installed in 2004. Any suggestions?

Hi Chris:
Pretty much an iMovie problem..read this discussion and pay special attention to anything Matti Haveri says..
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1160542&#1160542
Sue

Why does pictures saved as desktop looks so bad?

I stretch and looks distorted. Center and picture is npt cenyered-missing tp, bottom, and sides?

Adrian
Basically it's been built at 2268x1268, and I've resized it to 1024x768 (for PAL 16:9).
First problem is your file size. Check this info from DVDSP User manual
PAL 16:9 is 720x576 rectangular pixels. You must make your design in a 1024x576 canvas and resize it to 720x576 prior importing in DVDSP. Don't let DVDSP resize your graphics,it makes a very bad job.
Try this and come back !
By the way, I cannot see/download the image.
Hope that helps !
Alberto

Why is U51 blocking individual class files not in jars but U45 accepted them?

Let me answer the "why do you need individual class files?" question first. We have a rather large applet based application with a current client-side minimum jar download size of 1.8 MB. If we put ALL of our class files into jars, that size will probably double. Most users only use a small portion of the class files for their particular tasks. Which of the class files they use depends upon the tasks they perform. Having ALL users download ALL the classes, albeit compressed in jars, is extremely time consuming and a major problem after application updates due to the large number of users and the network load it would cause.
Jar file manifest:
Permissions: all-permissions
Codebase: *
Application-Name: MyApplication
Application-Library-Allowable-Codebase: *
Caller-Allowable-Codebase: *
Trusted-Library: true
We have 11 directories with one containing the applet and main client application code. The other 10 directories contain class files relating to the various sub-applications in the system. The system has a third-party runtime jar file, too.
We have a private network and servers for our business so the exposure is small. This is a screen-scraping, reformattring application that does no real data processing so doesn't need the same security as a true data processing application. Since we are not open to the Internet and of limited security risk, we chose to keep a more simplified structure.
This all worked under 1.7.0_45. I read the security guide and it was my understanding that these attributes in the manifest would also work for U51. Apparently not. Looking at the guides, now, it appears they have been changed sometime last year regarding mixed-code to mean jars with certificates and jars without certificates. The support for individual class files appears to have been removed. If this is true, then there should have been a beta of the U51 code because the rules seem to have been changed since the last release or there is a new bug.

This is exactly my same problem. My app (and applet) is about 5 MB if I consider all the classes and libraries used by the app. (I mean 5MB is the size of the jar file). I can't ask customers to download 5 MB every time they want to access the program.
We need java ask code signing for the principal applet but then we must have the possibility to run single class files as needed.
Help us all please.
Thanks Paolo

Why is font pulldown menu not working?

I'm using FCP 5.0.3 - and the font pulldown menu isn't working. It was working before and now just stopped. All that's available is the Lucida Grande default font. Does anyone know why this would be.
I threw out my preferences and restarted my computer to no avail. Any clues?
Thanks.

Have you installed any program recently that came with it's own fonts?
High probability that something bad has happened to your system and/or user fonts folder.
Open up the Application 'Font Book' and take a look. sometime if you have multiple instances of fonts, they can collide and cause problems.
Follow the Font Book Help (A bullet appears in my fonts list) to check for duplicates and then disable them.
It can be other things as well.
x
Do your part in supporting your fellow users. If a response has been Helpful to you or Solved your question, please mark it as such as an aid to other lost souls on the forum.
Also, don't forget to mark the thread Answered when you get enough information to close the thread.

Why java file name and class name are equal

could u explain why java file name and class name are equal in java

The relevant section of the JLS (?7.6):
When packages are stored in a file system (?7.2.1), the host system may choose to enforce the restriction that it is a compile-time error if a type is not found in a file under a name composed of the type name plus an extension (such as .java or .jav) if either of the following is true:
* The type is referred to by code in other compilation units of the package in which the type is declared.
* The type is declared public (and therefore is potentially accessible from code in other packages).
This restriction implies that there must be at most one such type per compilation unit. This restriction makes it easy for a compiler for the Java programming language or an implementation of the Java virtual machine to find a named class within a package; for example, the source code for a public type wet.sprocket.Toad would be found in a file Toad.java in the directory wet/sprocket, and the corresponding object code would be found in the file Toad.class in the same directory.
When packages are stored in a database (?7.2.2), the host system must not impose such restrictions. In practice, many programmers choose to put each class or interface type in its own compilation unit, whether or not it is public or is referred to by code in other compilation units.

Why do videos look so bad in QuickTime X and look good in everything else?

Why do videos look so bad in QuickTime X and look good in everything else?
Any way around this or is this something apple needs to fix?

OK, videos!
What kind of videos?
Have you tried using Quicktime Player 7?
Mac OS X 10.6 includes QuickTime versions 10.0 and 7.6.3. The QuickTime 7 player will only be present if a QuickTime Pro key was present at the time of installation, or if specified as part of a custom install, or individually downloaded.
http://support.apple.com/kb/dl923
Snow Leopard update 10.6.4 included an update to 7.6.6 (if installed). You can install it from the above link even though it says for 10.6.3. It's the same version of QuickTime Player 7.6.6.
Only QuickTime Player 7.6.3 or 7.6.6 can be updated to "Pro".

Why does my exported PDF not look like the original?

When I export a PDF to excel, the excel document doesn't look like the original. Any idea why or how to make it an exact duplicate?

No discussion mi adob france
Acrobat Pro, PDF Pack, Export PDF & More | A...
Acrobat
Adobe Document Solutions make it simple to help you get more done every day, and lets you easily create, edit, send, an...
Envoyé depuis Molto pour iPad
Message transféré:
De: Allamelle
Envoyé: jeudi, février 12, 2015 10:53 AM
À: [email protected]
Objet: Re: Why does my exported PDF not look like the original?
Stop Mdr
Envoyé depuis Molto pour iPad
De: Test Screen Name
Envoyé: jeudi, février 12, 2015 10:31 AM
À: René Allamelle
Objet: Why does my exported PDF not look like the original?
Why does my exported PDF not look like the original?
created by Test Screen Name in Adobe Acrobat.com Services - View the full discussion
"Vaguely like" is the best we can hope for and a minor miracle in itself. PDF was never meant to be converted.
If the reply above answers your question, please take a moment to mark this answer as correct by visiting: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7187391#7187391 and clicking ‘Correct’ below the answer
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:
Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed an image in your message please visit the thread in the forum and click the camera icon: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7187391#7187391
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at , click "Following" at the top right, & "Stop Following"
Start a new discussion in Adobe Acrobat.com Services by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1516624.

Why do we import a class

Why do we import the class TestFile and not call the class instead like in the code given below
package test;
import testing.TestFile;
import java.util.StringTokenizer;

"import" basically just defines aliases for class names. It lets you specify just the class name, without the full path. It makes the code easier to read.
You don't really call classes at all in Java. You call methods. You can do that later in the code.

Why is the ``A`` starting to look like the Masonic Temple logo?

Why
is
the
``A``
starting
to
look
like
the
Masonic
Temple
logo?

Why are you posting in the Classic forum, when no Classic operating system runs on iPhones or can sync with them? Is this a problem on your iPhone?
Or are you talking on a computer? Is this a phone that you have added some strange App on?
To post in the proper forum, read this tip:
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-2463
And please don't use one word a line. It makes your post really hard to read.

Why do the photos in my first InDesign project look really bad?

Why do the photos in my first InDesign project look really bad? Noticed as I "placed" them, some PDFs or JPEGs (not photos, but PDFs converted to JPEG) looked pretty distorted. Went ahead with the 60+ page project, converted to PDF, sent to client. He converted to a flipbook to proof and really didn't like the photos. Here's the irony. Upgraded to InDesign for this client. Was using Publisher as a standby until I could afford InDesign. Signed up with the Creative Cloud because job was overwhelming Publisher.
I started the job without a whole lot of knowledge (or patience for the tutorials) and figured I just wing it (and get InDesign for Dummies). Am thinking somethingw as screwed up in the initial setting up of the job. So how do I figure out if this is the issue and can I fix it without redoing all 60+ pages. If anybody has an answer, please let me know.

helpmemama wrote:
Why do the photos in my first InDesign project look really bad? Noticed as I "placed" them, some PDFs or JPEGs (not photos, but PDFs converted to JPEG) looked pretty distorted. Went ahead with the 60+ page project, converted to PDF, sent to client. He converted to a flipbook to proof and really didn't like the photos. Here's the irony. Upgraded to InDesign for this client. Was using Publisher as a standby until I could afford InDesign. Signed up with the Creative Cloud because job was overwhelming Publisher.
I started the job without a whole lot of knowledge (or patience for the tutorials) and figured I just wing it (and get InDesign for Dummies). Am thinking somethingw as screwed up in the initial setting up of the job. So how do I figure out if this is the issue and can I fix it without redoing all 60+ pages. If anybody has an answer, please let me know.
Ok, first image on your indesign page or any other program for that matter are still images, they are no longer pdf's, jpg's, psd's, etc. Once they load into a program, the file format is no longer relevant until you save again. Onl;y on your drive is the format relavent.
Second, if you can help it, never use jpg's until you are completely done and will be sharing a jpg. Jpg's are a lossy format are are not the best for preserving quality on your drive. Each time you open a jpg, and save a jpg more data is lost, as that is how that format compresses the data, by throwing it way for ever.
Third, the problem may not even be with you, it could happen when that person created a flipbook. That is an unknown varible, one which could make you look bad when it had nothing to do with you.
Fourth, Pay attention to the pixel dimentions of your images, the higher those values are the better the quality. Scaling can and probably will reduce that quality. If you can, it is better to hide parts of the image by cropping with a frame than it is to scale the image. you can scale, but pay attention to it.
I will stop there for now, as some of what I wrote is based on assumtions. That normally does not work out too well.

Firefox is not showing fonts and evertyhing else looks blurry

Started to use hdmi port and a 32" sony lcd. Chrome, explorer and safari works perfectly but firefox is not showing fonts and evertyhing else looks blurry
resolution: 1360 x 768
video card: nvidia gforce gtx 650

You can try to disable OMTC and leave hardware acceleration in Firefox enabled.
*about:config page: layers.offmainthreadcomposition.enabled = false
You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar.
You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/about:config
You can try to disable hardware acceleration in Firefox.
*Tools > Options > Advanced > General > Browsing: "Use hardware acceleration when available"
You need to close and restart Firefox after toggling this setting.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/upgrade-graphics-drivers-use-hardware-acceleration

Why do fonts display as blue, despite being red in live preview and in all the CSS rules?

I've been trying for hours to figure out WHY the fonts for certain lines will not obey every command I have given them in Dreamweaver.
http://www.johnnez.com/jonzmainbooks.html
The titles to these books are supposed to be red in color. They show red in every single place I can find them in Dreamweaver. They preview in red in live view. But they display in blue in the browser.
WHY is this? Is this a case of some CSS being over-ruled by a lower rule?
The tiles in blue that ought to be red are The 12 Days of Christmas in Washington, The Dancing Clock and Cromwell Dixon's Sky-Cycle, etc.
Thanks for any clues...
jn

CSS files are 404 not found on server.
Path is pointing here:
../../Jonz2012site/CSS/JonzheaderindexCSS.css
You might want to try this:
CSS/JonzheaderindexCSS.css
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb
http://alt-web.blogspot.com/

Why do FONTS, drawRECT & drawCIRCLE Classes look so bad in iOS?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for