Why does iPhone 4 take long time when finishing syncing?

I have recently started noticing, after upgrading to 7.0.3 that my iphone doesn't work as well, crashes occur in apps and it's a lot slower to process.
Then I went to back-up my iphone, to my Macbook Pro, as I always do and have recently done since upgrading to 7.0.3.
It goes through the first stages of back-up at a regualr speed.
But when it gets to 'Finishing Sync' .... well, it has been finishing now for over 30mins!
I have alot of Apps on my phone, but have never had an issue with using them before upgrading.
Can anyone give me some advice on what I need to do to prevent this or fix the speed of the sync.
Can I do a partial back-up/sync of importnat things like iCal - when im in a hurry?
My phone obviously won't back up properely if I eject it before it's finished? Love some assistance if anyone has any ideas.
Thanks!

Welcome to our community
Unless something has gone catastrophically wrong, you should never have to perform the uninstall/reinstall/reapply the patch hokey pokey. So that's just wasted effort. There is a simple way to perform what I call the "Factory Reset".
I recently described how to do this in the thread linked below:
Click here to view
I might question why this is needed at all. Perhaps you are unaware of some things that help you avoid issues with Captivate.
For example:
How many slides are in your projects? We normally recommend keeping projects somewhere between 50-65 slides as a rule of thumb guideline for the upper limit.
Where exactly are your projects residing when you make edits? Frequently we see folks working with projects on a network drive. This is less than optimal and will often cause issues and slowness and project corruption. Work locally off your C drive and periodically copy the project the network server to be backed up.
Hopefully something here was helpful to you... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
Captivate Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Adobe Certified Captivate Training
SorcerStone Blog
Captivate eBooks

Similar Messages

Why does iPhone rate whole album when it syncs to iTunes rather than just single song sometimes?

I wasn't sure if this should be an iTunes or iPhone discussion, so here goes!
I am very particular about rating my music. Every day at work, as songs play on my iPhone, I give them a star rating. This star rating then transfers to iTunes when I sync my phone. Most times, these ratings go through just fine. Sometimes, however, rather than just rating a single song with three stars on an album... It'll give the whole album in iTunes three stars. (Three stars is just an example.)
What I mean is that if viewing an album list, the album rating will be hard coded per se on the left and give all the songs three stars even if I never listened to / rated them. I can then click to remove the rating on the album on the left, and the unrated / unplayed songs will lose that hard coded rating and return to no rating.
What am I doing wrong? Lol. It drives me crazy! Once a month I view all my albums as a list so I can remove the hard coded ratings. There are usually six or seven albums that'll have it. I do nothing different on the iPhone that I am aware of.
Has anyone else experienced this situation or have a solution? I'm on an iPhone 4S, latest software. This also occurred with my iPhone 3GS
Chris

Still an issue, Apple. iPad with 5.1.1 and I have the same issue. There doesn't appear to be a way to rate a single song.

Why the iPhone vibrates 2 times when the iPhone OS is starting?

Someone know why the iPhone vibrates two times when the iPhone OS is starting (and the apple logo appears)
In my case, this rare event occurs when a problem with an application (3rd party) force to iPhone to restart or when occurs a problem during the sync with iTunes. After this event, my iPhone never load (your OS) and the only way is the restore.
null

Amazing how much trouble when can get into by taking shortcuts before we understand something... isn't it....
Read the API and find out for yourself what events are triggered by a JButton......
Remember thsi advices:
1) Before using shorthand event handling, make absolutely sure that you understand the process back to front...
2) Write your own event, listener and implementer in order to get a clearer picture...
3) Until this is clear to you, always implement the appropriate listener and override the necessary methods....

App list does not appear. Why does it take longer?

App list does not appear. Why does it take longer?

Hi smilekick,
Are you using Windows or Mac? Are you on a managed network. If no Try signing out and signing in of CC desktop. If still the same issue remove CC desktop, run the cleaner tool: http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/cscleanertool.html and try installing again.
Create a new user account and check whether the same issue persists.
Regards,
Romit Sinha

Why does it take longer to download a movie than to watch it

why does it take longer to download a movie than to watch it???

Most likely reason is a slow internet connection.
Test is at speedtest.net on a computer, you need 6 Mbps for instant HD.
AC

Data load to DSO takes long time to finish

Dear All,
We have a data load from data source to std DSO.The data load takes 5 hours to complete 6000 records in single data package which is long time.
Process monitor shows yellow status at one of the step for long time "No message :Transformation End" and after 5 hours approx it completes successfully.
Please find the snapshot of process monitor(Attached File Process monitor.png).
There is an end routine and the transformation is having direct mapping except for a target object exchage rate which is master data look up of DSO (Attached FIle : Transformation rule.png)
The look up DSO /BI0/AFIGL_DS00 in the below code is having DOCNUM as a primary key but not the POSKY. Since one of the field is not a primary key,secondary index is created for the look up DSO.But,still it takes huge time to finish the last step as mentioned in the snapshot.
Setting for parallel process is 1
DTP--> Update tab-->Error handling-->No update,no reporting.But there is a error DTP present which I believe that there is no use when "No update,No reporting" option is chosen.
Can you please suggest the reason for the such long time.Also,Please suggest how to find the exact place where it consumes lot of time.
End routine Logic:
    IF NOT RESULT_PACKAGE IS INITIAL.
      REFRESH IT_FIG.
      SELECT DOCNUM POSKY DEBCRE LOCC
      FROM /BI0/AFIGL_DS00 INTO TABLE IT_FIG
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN RESULT_PACKAGE
      WHERE DOCNUM = RESULT_PACKAGE-BILNO AND
            POSKY = '02'.
    LOOP AT RESULT_PACKAGE ASSIGNING <RESULT_FIELDS>.
        READ TABLE IT_FIG INTO WA_FIG WITH KEY
                   DOCNUM = <RESULT_FIELDS>-BILNO.
        IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
          <RESULT_FIELDS>-DEB = WA_FIG-DEBCRE.
          <RESULT_FIELDS>-LOC_CURRC2 = WA_FIG-LOCC.
        ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Pradeep

Hi,
below code check it and try to load the data.
IF RESULT_PACKAGE IS NOT INITIAL.
      SELECT DOCNUM
                      POSKY
                      DEBCRE
                      LOCC
      FROM /BI0/AFIGL_DS00 INTO TABLE IT_FIG
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN RESULT_PACKAGE
      WHERE DOCNUM = RESULT_PACKAGE-BILNO AND
            POSKY = '02'.
    LOOP AT RESULT_PACKAGE ASSIGNING <RESULT_FIELDS>.
        READ TABLE IT_FIG INTO WA_FIG WITH KEY
                   DOCNUM = <RESULT_FIELDS>-BILNO.
        IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
           <RESULT_FIELDS>-DEB = WA_DOCNUM.
           <RESULT_FIELDS>-DEB = WA_POSKY.
          <RESULT_FIELDS>-DEB = WA_FIG-DEBCRE.
          <RESULT_FIELDS>-LOC_CURRC2 = WA_FIG-LOCC.
        ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
if your are getting any error please let us know
1.decrease the data packet size in DTP like 10,000 or 20,000.
2.increase the parallel process at DTP level.
Thanks,
Phani.

Why update query takes long time ?

Hello everyone;
My update query takes long time. In emp ( self testing) just having 2 records.
when i issue update query , it takes long time;
SQL> select * from emp;
EID ENAME     EQUAL     ESALARY     ECITY    EPERK       ECONTACT_NO
      2   rose              mca                  22000   calacutta                   9999999999
      1   sona             msc                  17280    pune                          9999999999
Elapsed: 00:00:00.05
SQL> update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1';
update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1'
* ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
Elapsed: 00:01:11.72
SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
update emp set esalary=15000
* ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
Elapsed: 00:02:22.27

Hi BCV;
Thanks for your reply but it doesn't provide output, please see   this.
SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
........... Lock already occured.
>> trying to trace >>
SQL> select HOLDING_SESSION from dba_blockers;
HOLDING_SESSION
            144
SQL> select sid , username, event from v$session where username='HR';
SID USERNAME     EVENT
   144   HR    SQL*Net message from client
   151   HR    enq: TX - row lock contention
   159   HR    SQL*Net message from client
>> It does n 't provide clear output about transaction lock >>
SQL> SELECT username, v$lock.SID, TRUNC (id1 / POWER (2, 16)) rbs,
2 BITAND (id1, TO_NUMBER ('ffff', 'xxxx')) + 0 slot, id2 seq, lmode,
3 request
4 FROM v$lock, v$session
5 WHERE v$lock.TYPE = 'TX'
6 AND v$lock.SID = v$session.SID
7 AND v$session.username = USER;
no rows selected
SQL> select MACHINE from v$session where sid = :sid;
SP2-0552: Bind variable "SID" not declared.

MIRO take long time when enter invoice for PO with GR-based invoice

Hi,
In my client system, system take long time for extracting PO data while booking invoice via. MIRO for the purchase order which have GR-based IV is marked. However system take few second for extracting PO data when enter invoice via. MIRO for the PO which don't have GR-based IV. Please note following point while providing the solution:
- this problem is exist only for the purchase order related to one company code. However system working perfectly for other company code in the same client. Hence we assuming that some company code level cofiguration is missing.
- the problem is exist for po with account assignment K.
- we have one to one mapping for purchase organization to company code to plant.
Appreciate for you quick respond. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
sp sahu

Hi,
Please check with FI guy for GL A/c and Cost centers which you are using to create the PO with item category K.
Still problem permits check with your ABAP person.
Regards,
Mohd Ali.

With track locking why does it take longer to --

1.) With track locking, why does it say so much longer to "Save As" and to create bakcup copies of songs?
2.) If after I lock tracks to improve performance can I unlock them for the purpose of faster "Save As" and copies?

I found from my experience that if one deletes the freeze files to save space but does not unlock the tracks GB will not search for the files upon opening but rather will recreate the locked tracks after you click "Play".
I just wanted to clarify that. I didn't want anyone to think GB will open a tune and then begin a search right away. It won't happen until you click play.
Heres my reasoning for leaving the tracks locked and deleting the freeze tracks and not unlocking them before hand.
If I leave the tracks locked and then delete the files I don't have to remember later which tracks I wanted locked and which ones I did not want locked. All I need to do is open the file and click play. Its actually more convenient. If you unlock the tracks first then delete the files you have to go back later and relock the ones you wanted. TO me thats a much easier way to remember things.
I agree with you whole heartily when it comes to "Save As Archive". Its the only way to save.
"Save" And "Save As" only creates a pointer to your files in and from the "Project Data" file. They do not add AIFF files taken from GB browser to the "Media" folder. Only a recorded instrument (vocal or instrument) or a file dropped into time line are saved in the media folder using "Save" or "Save As". Or in other words anything from "Outside" the GB browser.
MIDI instruments recorded into GB are not kept in the Media folder after a "Save" or Save As" or unfortunately "Save As Archive".
"Save as Archive" saves all the files you currently have in the GB timeline (except MIDI data) in the Media Folder. A nice, safe, sure way to know all your intended files will be there when you open your tune or burn it to a disc and return it in the future. This is why I always use it. It does of course make you .band file much larger.
Recently I have tested the .band files for operator usefulness and error to try to alleviate the somewhat unfounded fears placed upon opening the file with the "Show Package Contents" function.
Sure thing can go wrong if your careless when you open the .band file but its not as is clicking any of the audio file will hurt anything.
You can play many of these files saved under "Save as Archive" with the finder.
I have found that if you ACCIDENTLY toss out any AIFF files that were taken from the GB browser and placed into the timeline that this will not hinder your .band file from opening. GB will still open and play your file as it normally would and when you "Save As Archive " again those browser files will be replaced in the media folder. Even if you have looped them, cut them, shortened them.
If you ACCIDENTLY toss out a file added to the timeline or a recorded instrument or vocal then your in trouble because it is gone but the GB file will still open. GB will tell you it can't find the file and ask if you want to search for it.
Now if you Toss out your "Project FIle" then your screwed. The .band file will not open and the game is over.
Why do I even mention all this? Not to annoy anyone or go to battle over the subject but simply to mention that I have tested every scenario and that opening the .band file and clicking around will not harm a thing. Clicking around will not harm anything or damage your file. Just leave the "Project Data" file alone.

Why does Verizon Penalize Long-time Customers?

I started out as a Alltel customer in 2004 and became Verizon during the merger. I had a pretty nice plan at 500mins with unlimited text and data. When Verizon started their More Everything Plans, they started alienating those of us who still had unlimited plans. Not only are the plans more expensive than the Alltel plan I have (by about $10 - $15 for a decent plan), but if you didn't sign up for it, you could no longer upgrade at the promotional price and had to pay full price for your phone.
The compromise to this was Verizon Max. This gave customers a way to keep a fairly large amount of data (6GB) and still keep their plan price low. However, even this plan penalizes customers:
     - You can't share the data
     - You can't use your device as a hotspot, even though you have plenty of data to use
This works just fine, until you decide to add devices to your plan. So here's my situation:
I'm sitting pretty at about $90 per month (before taxes, add-ons, discount) on the Max plan. All is well until I see that they started selling the Galaxy Gear S. I call Verizon and they tell me I need to upgrade to the More Everything Plan, which is about $120 before taxes for 10GB (they give you 10GB instead of 6GB). Then you pay $5 per month to add the watch to your plan. All this for a total of $125 a month - a permanent difference of $30.
Obviously I don't want to spend that much more money on my plan, so I ask what else they can do. They said the only other thing they can do is add the device as a separate line with its own data plan and phone number. Since the only plan you can buy from Big Red is More Everything, that comes out to about $25 before taxes. That's only a $5 difference between that and More Everything, so I may as well use More Everything so I can keep the same number and just share data.
My point is, either way, I will have to pay at least $25 just to enjoy the benefits of owning a new device. For context, before More Everything, new lines only cost $10 and you just paid for the device and that was that - easy. $10 is something I can handle - $15 is pushing it. But $25 more a month??
It's ridiculous I have to jump through all these hoops just to enjoy new devices and good service. As a customer of 10yrs, there's absolutely nothing Customer Care is even able to do for me (I was on the phone with them for over an hour) and their so-called loyalty plans are just crippled versions of the fully-priced plans. I just want to buy the stupid watch, add it to my plan for a low price, and keep it moving.
There's no benefit to being a long time customer at Verizon, so I'm going to start looking at other companies that take better care of their loyal customers. I'd love to stay with Verizon, but there's obviously no love for me.

Hi Lasina, thank you for reaching out.
I didn’t get a new number, but I was presented with the full paperwork.
I’m not sure how you can restore my trust in Verizon. First of all, they blew me off in the store – told me I needed to contact customer support. My expectation was that speaking to someone in the store was one of the customer service options.
Once the Target employee listened to my needs, he actually got me to upgrade my phone. When I called with questions regarding the $40 I was charged to activate the new phone. After asking to speak to a supervisor, I was put on hold, and the agent came back to me with this stupid option about how they’d refund $20 and then give me $2/month to make up the difference.
At this point, I asked about my cancellation options – since I called immediately when I got the bill. I was told I was 3 days past the opportunity to cancel my contract altogether – unless I want to fork over $350.
I am open to whatever options you have to attempt to restore my faith in Verizon, but my Customer Service experience so far isn’t promising.
What do you propose?

Take long time when IAS startup

Hi,
We have a problem in develope enviornment. IAS takes longer and longer
to finish its startup. We do not know the exact reason but reinstall IAS
will kill this problem. It seems IAS read some info from JNDI or
whatever, which grows over time.
Anybody knows how to solve this problem wothout reinstalling IAS?
Thanks

Hi,
I would like to know the configuration of your system. Next, what is the
version of iAS, next, what is the application that you are running and the
size of your application.
Regards
Raj
default wrote:
Hi,
We have a problem in develope enviornment. IAS takes longer and longer
to finish its startup. We do not know the exact reason but reinstall IAS
will kill this problem. It seems IAS read some info from JNDI or
whatever, which grows over time.
Anybody knows how to solve this problem wothout reinstalling IAS?
Thanks

Why does addressbooksync takes long and using really a lot of ram!?

When I sync the iPhone with iTunes and look at my activity monitor, it shows that it takes more and more ram to do this. After 5 minutes while sysncing the addressbook only, the amount of ram used is already 6.70 gb! Here a screenshot:
Why is this? It completely slows down my system.

It's not a memory leak, see the references to learn more about how RAM is utilized to speed up the Mac.
OS X Mavericks: About Activity Monitor - Apple Support
http://www.switchingtomac.com/tutorials/osx/understanding-memory-pressure-in-os- x-mavericks/
http://macs.about.com/od/macoperatingsystems/fl/Understanding-Compressed-Memory- in-OS-X.htm

Why does it take longer to Save with Layers v. no Layers?

I've noticed that file save times go way up even with just 1 layer (plus Background) compared to saving with no layers. "Flat" PSDs save very fast, whether to my SSD boot drive, or to my spinny work drive.Is this normal? And can anyone tell me why?
My scratch disc is on my SSD boot drive. Windows 7 Ultimate fully updated. I have 30GB of RAM and my average file size (open) is around 400MB. I do have the compatibility turned on (otherwise Lightroom doesn't like it), and compression. I understand those will add more time. But why so much more than a "flat" PSD?

Thanks. I need to rephrase my subject line I guess...
Obviously, additional layers will take longer to save, because, like you said, each layers is like another image (sorta). HOWEVER, the save time seems to increase EXPONENTIALLY just by adding 1 layer.
Here's a specific example...
I'm working on a 7360 x 4912 image which Photoshop says is 206.9M. It takes less than 2 seconds to save the PSD.
I clicked Ctrl+J to copy the Background layer to a new layer. Now there's the Background layer, plus Layer 1, and now Photoshop tells me it's 206.9M/413.7M. Now it takes 34 seconds to save the PSD!
So it's not just double, it takes 17x longer!!! Why so much longer?

Why does it take long for adobe to process my payment?

I just want to know why its taking so long for adobe to process my payment for the student plan 300$ per year for the creative cloud. Ive been waiting for 2 hours.

Jose,
I just checked the status of the order as it was showing Unauthorized. You might try placing the order again. Did you submit your Educational information to qualify for the student pricing?
Order Details
Order Number: AD003062948EDU
Store: OLS-EDU
Order Date: Apr. 27, 2014 2:47:48 PM PDT
Order Date Local Time: Apr. 27, 2014 17:47:48 PM US/Eastern
Order Status: Unauthorized
Thanks
Scott

Why does Firefox no longer launch when I double-click the icon?

I found an article on the support site that suggested creating a new profile, but the run command did not launch profile manager. I tried uninstall/reinstall, but it does not change behavior. When I click the icon, I get the hourglass for a moment, and then nothing. I'm on WinXP. On 10-14-11, I thought I saw a pop-up menu saying Firefox was updating (I did not initiate it, nor was I presented with a confirm pop-up), but it was very brief, so I'm not sure. After that day, Firefox would no longer launch. I've not made any system changes, or installed any programs.

See:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode
A possible cause is security software (firewall) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
Remove all rules for Firefox from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
See:
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Server+not+found
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Firewalls

Why does iPhone 4 take long time when finishing syncing?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for